Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 May 11;19(5):e1011388. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011388

α-Hemolysin promotes uropathogenic E. coli persistence in bladder epithelial cells via abrogating bacteria-harboring lysosome acidification

Manisha Naskar 1,#, Viraj P Parekh 2,#, Mathew A Abraham 3, Zehra Alibasic 1, Min Jung Kim 1, Gyeongseo Suk 1, Joo Hwan Noh 1, Kwan Young Ko 4, Joonha Lee 1, Chungho Kim 1, Hana Yoon 5, Soman N Abraham 3,6,7, Hae Woong Choi 1,‡,*
Editor: Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose8
PMCID: PMC10204954  PMID: 37167325

Abstract

There is a growing consensus that a significant proportion of recurrent urinary tract infections are linked to the persistence of uropathogens within the urinary tract and their re-emergence upon the conclusion of antibiotic treatment. Studies in mice and human have revealed that uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) can persist in bladder epithelial cells (BECs) even after the apparent resolution of the infection. Here, we found that, following the entry of UPEC into RAB27b+ fusiform vesicles in BECs, some bacteria escaped into the cytoplasmic compartment via a mechanism involving hemolysin A (HlyA). However, these UPEC were immediately recaptured within LC3A/B+ autophagosomes that matured into LAMP1+ autolysosomes. Thereafter, HlyA+ UPEC-containing lysosomes failed to acidify, which is an essential step for bacterial elimination. This lack of acidification was related to the inability of bacteria-harboring compartments to recruit V-ATPase proton pumps, which was attributed to the defragmentation of cytosolic microtubules by HlyA. The persistence of UPEC within LAMP1+ compartments in BECs appears to be directly linked to HlyA. Thus, through intravesicular instillation of microtubule stabilizer, this host defense response can be co-opted to reduce intracellular bacterial burden following UTIs in the bladder potentially preventing recurrence.

Author summary

Many strains of uropathogenic E.coli are capable of secreting the soluble toxin α-hemolysin (HlyA). Intracellular UPEC persistence within bladder epithelial cells is highly correlated with their ability to express HlyA. HlyA disrupted cytosolic microtubules, which are required for the recruitment of V-ATPase proton pumps to LAMP1+ vesicles. Therefore, the majority of LAMP1+ vesicles carrying UPEC in host cells were unable to be acidified, which is a critical step for killing bacteria. Since HlyA-mediated microtubule fragmentation is essential for UPEC persistence in the bladder, treatment with paclitaxel (a microtubule stabilizer) in the bladders of UPEC-infected mice significantly reduced the bladder bacterial burden even in the absence of antibiotic treatment.

Introduction

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the second most common bacterial infection in humans, accounting for approximately 8.1 million clinical visits each year [1]. Women (aged 16–35 years) are approximately 35 times more likely to be UTI patients than men because of anatomical differences, such as a shorter urethra and its proximity to the rectal opening [2]. UTIs are notorious for their capacity for recurrence, even after the administration of an appropriate antibiotic therapy [3,4]. Indeed, recurrent infections typically occur within 6 months after the cessation of antibiotic treatment. It is estimated that up to 25% of UTI patients visiting a clinic have already experienced a previous UTI [5]. The same bacterial strains that initiate the initial infection are responsible for UTI recurrence in patients and can last for up to three years in the urinary tract [3,4].

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) accounts for over 80% of UTIs in patients with no underlying pre-existing conditions [5]. UPEC typically initiates infection by attaching to the bladder epithelium, thereby resisting early elimination during voiding. These adherent UPEC rapidly multiply in the urine, exceeding 1 × 103 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL in this medium [6]. To sustain UTI, a fraction of the urine-borne UPEC gains entry into the normally impervious bladder superficial epithelium by co-opting intracellular RAB27b+ fusiform vesicles, which are distinct membrane-storing vesicles present in these cells to regulate bladder volume [7,8]. These intracellular UPEC can sustain the infection between bouts of bladder voiding, and also promote recurrence of the infection following antibiotic treatment, as in their intracellular location they are protected from antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and gentamicin that are widely prescribed in clinics [9,10]. The intracellular emplacement of UPEC being protected from antibiotics poses challenges in eradicating UPEC from infected bladders.

Bladder epithelial cells (BECs) possess several distinct mechanisms to reduce the intracellular UPEC load. Almost immediately upon sensing intracellular UPEC within RAB27b+ fusiform vesicles, BECs trigger the expulsion of these intracellular UPEC [7,11]. This involves mobilizing the cellular trafficking machinery employed for hormone secretion to mediate the cAMP-dependent exocytosis of UPEC contained within RAB27b+ fusiform vesicles [8,12]. However, not all the intracellular UPEC are expelled as a recent report has proposed that this is because UPEC escape RAB27b+ compartments via unknown mechanisms to enter the cytosol [12]. This report has suggested that UPEC found free in the cytosol of BECs is promptly recognized by autophagy components, engulfed in autophagosomes, and thereafter expelled in a transient receptor potential cation channel 3 (TRPML3)-dependent manner from lysosomes, once the autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes [12]. UPEC that is not expelled from lysosomes are presumably killed by the bactericidal actions of lysosomes [13,14]. Nevertheless, despite the repertoire of powerful bacteria-clearing actions of BECs, UTIs and their frequent recurrence remain a significant clinical challenge [9,15]. The findings that UPEC form quiescent intracellular reservoirs (QIRs) within lysosomal vesicles of superficial epithelial cells and the underlying intermediate epithelium of recurrent UTI patients [9] could suggest defects in lysosomal killing within infected BECs.

Many UPEC isolates have been found to secrete soluble toxins, particularly α-hemolysin (HlyA) [16,17] and there appears to be a strong correlation between HlyA expression by UPEC and UTI severity [18,19]. Several clinical studies report that 40 to 58 percent of UPEC isolates exhibit the capacity to secrete hemolysin and that this toxin is directly associated with the onset of UTI [2022]. Mechanically, HlyA produced by UPEC has been reported to promote cellular toxicity and urothelial damage [16,23]. During UTIs in particular, HlyA was found to promote exfoliation of superficial epithelial cells by triggering caspase-1/caspase-4-dependent inflammatory cell death [24,25]. Interestingly, a clinical study has reported that whereas 37.6% of UPEC isolated from first-time UTI patients express the hlyA gene, this number jumped to 48.2% in patients experiencing recurring UTI, suggesting that HlyA might contribute to bacterial persistence in the bladder and recurrent UTIs [26].

Here, we sought to investigate the contribution of HlyA to UPEC persistence in the urinary bladder. We found that HlyA-expressing UPEC promotes intracellular persistence by initially promoting bacterial escape from RAB27b+ vesicles into the cytosol and subsequently preventing the acidification of UPEC-containing lysosomes. HlyA-mediated de-acidification of lysosomes involves the disruption of microtubules involved in trafficking V-ATPase toward lysosomes. Finally, treating mouse bladders with a pharmacological disruptor of microtubules was found to be effective in reducing the intracellular bacterial burden following UTIs.

Results

Persistence of UPEC within BECs in vivo and in vitro

Before investigating the mechanisms employed by UPEC to survive and persist within BECs, we investigated bacterial persistence in the mouse bladder following transurethral UPEC infection. C57BL/6J female mice were trans-urethrally infected with 1 × 108 CFU of strain CI5, a clinical UPEC isolate, and then the bacterial load in their bladders was assessed at various time-points. On day 1, 2.5 × 103 CFU of the bacteria were detected in the bladders, but by day 9, the levels had decreased to approximately 5 × 102 CFU (Fig 1A), and after which these residual levels of bacteria remained stable for over 8 weeks (S1 Fig). To localize the bacteria within the bladder, we examined cross-sections of the bladder using specific probes for bacteria (red) and the superficial bladder epithelium (green). On day 9, bladder-associated UPEC were found exclusively within the superficial epithelium and co-localized with the lysosomal vesicle marker, LAMP1 (Fig 1B, arrowheads). To see if bacterial persistence was attributable to a limited neutrophil response in the bladder, we assessed neutrophil recruitment at various time points following UPEC infection employing flow cytometry, where we probed for Ly6G+ CD11b+ CD45+ cells. As shown in Fig 1C (Gating on neutrophils is shown in S2 Fig), there appeared to be an early and vigorous neutrophil response within a few hours of infection. However, this neutrophil recruitment began to subside by day 1 and had reached baseline levels by day 6 in spite of the persistence of residual bacteria (Fig 1C).

Fig 1. UPEC persist in bladder epithelial cells.

Fig 1

A. Prolonged bacterial burden in the infected mouse bladders. C57BL/6 female mice were infected by intravesical instillation of the UPEC CI5 strain; bacterial CFUs in the infected bladders were measured at the indicated time-points. Single dot indicates an individual mouse, and the panel represents one representative result from three independent experiments. B. Presence of UPEC in infected mouse bladders. Confocal microscopy images of mouse bladders infected with the CI5 UPEC strain for 9 d. UPEC (E. coli, red), lysosomal vesicles (LAMP1, blue), and superficial epithelial cells (wheat-germ agglutinin, green). The regions highlighted by squares with dashes in the upper panels are enlarged in the corresponding lower panels. “L”: lumen of the bladder. (Bar graph) The percentage of co-localization between UPEC and LAMP1+ vesicles in an 80 μm × 80 μm microscopic region. C. Neutrophil response peaked at 6 h p.i. and then diminished. Recruitment of neutrophils was measured by analyzing the flow cytometry in the infected mouse bladders. C57BL6/J mice were infected with UPEC CI5 strain, and then harvested bladders at each time point were analyzed for flow cytometry analysis. Ly6G+ CD11b+ CD45+ cells in the infected mouse bladders were counted by flow cytometry. The population percentage was determined using CD45+ cells. Each dot represents an individual mouse and the panel shows the combined results from two independent experiments. D. Bladder biopsies were obtained from recurrent UTI patients and immunostained for UPEC (E. coli, green), urothelium (E-cadherin, blue), and lysosomal vesicles (LAMP1, red). “L”: lumen of the bladder. E. UPEC C15 strain persisted in the infected human 5637 bladder epithelial cells (BECs) for over 120 h p.i. Data information: Quantitative data from two to three independent experiments were analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test or ordinary one-way ANOVA, *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Interestingly, when we subjected biopsied human bladder tissue obtained from recurrent UTI patients to immunofluorescence microscopy, we observed UPEC similarly localized in lysosomal vesicles within bladder epithelial cells (Fig 1D, arrowheads; bladder tissue images from additional patients are provided in S3 Fig). These observations confirm these findings in mice showing UPEC intracellular localization within bladder epithelial cells of mice is comparable to that in humans.

Having observed that UPEC can persist in vivo for prolonged periods within superficial BECs, we sought to elucidate the underlying basis for this phenomenon, by investigating bacterial persistence in vitro in the widely employed human 5637 bladder epithelium cell line, which was established from a transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder [27,28]. We found that following exposure of the 5637 BECs to the CI5 strain [2 × 107 CFU; multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100] and subsequent exposure to gentamicin (40 μg/mL), to kill extracellular bacteria, close to 5 × 103 CFU of bacteria entered the BECs. Thereafter, the numbers of intracellular bacteria steadily declined, as observed in vivo, for the next 24 h (Fig 1E). However, the numbers of intracellular bacteria within BECs steadied at approximately 1 × 103 CFU until at least day 5 post infection (p.i.), at which point we concluded these studies (Fig 1E). Thus, the ability of UPEC CI5 to persist within the human BEC line in vitro appeared to mimic their ability to persist within primary superficial bladder epithelium in mice and in primary bladder epithelial cells in humans.

Trafficking of intracellular UPEC from RAB27b vesicles into LC3A/B+ compartments is preceded by a brief cytosolic phase

Previous studies have revealed that infected BECs employ distinct components of the cellular export machinery, including RAB27b+ fusiform vesicles and lysosomal vesicles, to lower the intracellular bacterial burden [8,12,29]. We sought to confirm previous findings that UPEC harbored in RAB27b compartments eventually became encapsulated within LC3A/B+ compartments (autophagosomes). We probed UPEC-infected BECs with antibodies against RAB27b and LC3A/B+ compartments, at different time-points following infection. Fig 2A is a microscopic image taken at 4 h p.i. showing a BEC harboring UPEC closely associated with a RAB27b+ vesicle. We found that whereas a majority (70%) of UPEC were housed in RAB27b+ compartments at 2.5 h p.i., their numbers dropped to 30% by 12 h and remained at that level even at 24 h p.i. (Fig 2B). Conversely, by 5 h p.i., only a small proportion (<30%) of the intracellular UPEC were housed in LC3A/B+ compartments, but by 12 and 24 h, the proportion had increased to 70% (Figs 2C and S4). Shown in S4A Fig is a BEC housing UPEC within an LC3A/B+ compartment at 8 h p.i. Moreover, we observed that the UPECs in LC3 autophagosomes at 8 h p.i. did not co-localize with RAB27b molecules, which were present in the vesicles at 4 h p.i. (S4B and S4C Fig). These findings are consistent with the notion that UPEC are initially encased in RAB27b+ compartments but, at later time points, become ensnared in LC3A/B+ compartments. To support these microscopic studies, we undertook an independent experimental approach where we sought to isolate intracellular UPEC from infected BECs at various time points p.i. and identify the specific intracellular vesicle they were associated with. To facilitate the isolation of intracellular UPEC, we first crosslinked these bacteria with magnetic microbeads and then exposed them to BECs. Although this cross-linking technique had previously been shown not to significantly impact bacteria’s ability to bind and invade BECs [12], we confirmed this by showing that magnetic bead-bound UPEC readily bound BECs as unlabeled UPEC and were internalized to the same degree (S5 and S6 Figs). To isolate vesicle-associated intracellular UPEC, we selectively disrupted the plasma membrane of infected BECs at various time intervals and then employed a magnet to separate the bacteria from the rest of the cellular lysate as described previously [12]. By using this technique followed by subjecting the bacterial isolates to western blot, we confirmed that most of the UPEC were associated with RAB27b+ vesicles at 4 h p.i. However, by 8 and 24 h p.i., the association of intracellular UPEC with RAB27b became markedly decreased (Fig 2D). In contrast, low levels of intracellular UPEC were associated with LC3A/B vesicles at early time points, but at later time points the association level markedly increased (Fig 2D).

Fig 2. Autophagosome formation after the escape of UPEC from RAB27b+ vesicles.

Fig 2

A. UPEC present in RAB27b+ vesicles at 4 h p.i. Human 5637 BECs were infected with the UPEC CI5 strain for 4 h and were stained with anti-RAB27b (red), anti-UPEC (green), or anti-LAMP1 (blue) antibodies. Representative images are from randomly selected regions. B and C. Reciprocal trend of UPEC presence in RAB27b+ vesicles and LC3A/B+ vesicles of human 5637 BECs. To quantify the co-localization of UPEC with (B) RAB27b+ or (C) LC3A/B+, the optical fields (100 μm × 100 μm) were randomly selected in the confocal microscopy images and quantified at the indicated time-points. D. Prevalence of UPEC in different vesicles during infection. The human 5637 BECs were infected with magnetic bead-labeled UPEC, and the UPEC-housing vesicles were extracted at the indicated time-points. Anti-RAB27b or anti-LC3A/B antibodies were used for western blotting. Loading control of UPEC-containing vesicles was detected with anti-GAPDH antibody. E. Time course survival of isolated UPEC from gentamicin treatment. Human 5637 BECs were infected with magnetic bead-labeled UPEC. After the indicated time points, magnetic bead-labeled UPEC were isolated from infected host cells and exposed to gentamicin. No gentamicin treatment on isolated UPEC was used to calculate intracellular UPEC inside or outside of vesicles. F. Presence of UPEC in vesicles expressing LC3A/B. The human 5637 BECs were transfected with non-specific (NS) siRNA or ATG5 siRNA. Then, the UPEC CI5 strain infected human BECs (8 h) were stained with anti-E. coli (green) and anti-LC3A/B (red) antibodies. G. UPEC in autophagosomes were protected from gentamicin exposure. The human 5637 BECs were pre-treated with NS siRNA or ATG5 siRNA, followed by infection with the magnetic bead-labeled UPEC CI5 strain. After 4 h of infection, the isolated UPEC containing vesicles were treated with gentamicin and bacterial survival was examined. Gentamicin incubation was performed with or without 0.1% Triton X100. Data was normalized by dividing the “CFU of UPEC in each condition” with the “CFU of isolated magnetic bead-UPEC without gentamicin treatment”. H. Autophagosome-mediated UPEC trafficking requires BECLIN and ATG5. Human 5637 BECs were transfected with BECLIN siRNA (square), ATG5 siRNA (triangle), or NS siRNA (circle). Transfected cells were infected with UPEC CI5 strains at the indicated time-points, and the intracellular bacterial burdens were compared. Then, the percentage of each condition’s CFU relative to the CFU of WT BECs infected with UPEC was calculated. Data information: Quantitative data from two to three independent experiments were analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by ordinary one-way ANOVA (B, C, E) or two-way ANOVA (G, H), *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ****P<0.0001; n.s, not significant. Scale bar: 10 μm.

It has previously been proposed that prior to encapsulation of UPEC in LC3A/B+ autophagosomes, the bacteria are likely found free in the cytosol [12]. To demonstrate the existence of cytosolic UPEC in infected BECs, we infected BECs with magnetic beads labeled UPEC. Thereafter, at various time intervals, we selectively lysed the plasma membrane of infected BECs and isolated intracellular UPEC using a magnet and then exposed them to gentamicin. If isolated UPEC were truly cytosolic and not encased in a vesicle, they would display sensitivity to gentamicin (S7 Fig). We found that whereas the majority of UPEC isolated at 2 h (67%) and 8 h p.i. (77%) were insensitive to gentamicin, only 48% of UPEC at 4 h p.i. were protected from gentamicin (Figs 2E and S8). Interestingly, 4 h p.i. corresponds to the timepoint at which UPEC found in RAB27b transition into LC3A/B vesicles. To further support the notion that a cytosolic phase exists between the two proposed vesicular phases, we sought to knock down autophagy-related 5 (ATG 5) which works closely with LC3A/B in forming the autophagosome in BECs [30,31]. We reasoned that if we knocked down a critical component of the autophagosome such as ATG5 (S9 Fig), we would prevent uptake of cytosolic UPEC by LC3A/B vesicles in infected BECs (Fig 2F). As a consequence, many more intracellular UPEC would be susceptible to gentamicin treatment in ATG5 siRNA transfected BECs compared to infected non-specific (NS) siRNA transfected BECs. Indeed only 10% of UPEC from ATG5-knocked down BECs was protected from gentamicin, whereas over 60% of UPEC isolated from control BECs was protected from gentamicin (Figs 2G and S10) at 8 h p.i. This was further confirmed because when isolated UPEC from NS or ATG5-knocked down BECs were treated with Triton X-100, which disrupts host membranes [12], both groups of UPEC were susceptible to gentamicin.

Finally, we examined whether the cytosolic existence of UPEC is advantageous to bacteria by quantifying intracellular UPEC numbers in WT BECs and in BECs where particular autophagy components were knocked down. We compared intracellular UPEC numbers obtained at different times p.i. in BECs that had earlier been transfected with NS siRNA (control), ATG5 siRNA, or BECLIN siRNA (ortholog of yeast Atg6, another component of the autophagosome) [31]. Fig 2H reveals that, compared to control transfected BECs, BECs knocked down in either ATG5 or BECLIN harbored significantly more intracellular bacteria than control transfected BECs. Further, this number seemed to increase significantly with increased incubation time suggesting that when not restricted in a vesicle UPEC have the capacity to grow rapidly in the cytosol of BECs (Figs 2H and S11). Therefore, our findings suggest that intracellular UPEC numbers are kept controlled as long as bacteria are encased in various vesicles, but if the bacteria are able to escape into the cytosol, the BECs do not have the capacity to control their numbers.

HlyA facilitates the escape of UPEC from RAB27b+ vesicles

HlyA is a virulence determinant found in isolates that are frequently reported in UTIs and known to cause hemolysis of red blood cells through the disruption of cell membranes. In view of its membrane disrupting properties, we hypothesized that the contribution of HlyA to UPEC virulence in the bladder promotes bacterial escape from the RAB27b compartments. The strain CFT073 is a commonly used HlyA-expressing UPEC, while ΔhlyD is a HlyA-isogenic mutant strain [32,33]. We compared the hemolytic capacity of strain CI5 or strain J96 with that of the CFT073 and ΔhlyD strains. E. coli K-12, which is deficient in HlyA or other hemolytic factors, was also included in this assay. UPEC strain CI5, J96, and CFT073 caused significant hemolysis, with CFT073 causing twice as much hemolysis as CI5, as compared to that caused by the K-12 strain, whereas strain ΔhlyD exhibited limited hemolysis (Fig 3A). In view of these findings, we proceeded to employ strains CFT073 and ΔhlyD to study the contribution of HlyA in bacterial escape from the RAB27b+ compartment into the cytosol. The exposure of BECs to the wild-type (WT) CFT073 strain (MOI: 200) resulted in significant cytotoxicity (Fig 3B). Therefore, we examined lower MOIs to identify MOIs with limited cellular cytotoxicity. At MOIs of 50 and below, BECs retained their viability for at least 16 h (Fig 3C), and we used a sublytic MOI of 50 or below for the CFT073 strain for the remainder of our study.

Fig 3. HlyA-mediated evasion of UPEC from RAB27b+ fusiform vesicles.

Fig 3

A. The ability of UPEC strains to mediate red blood cell (RBC) lysis varies. The levels of RBC membrane lysis by various UPEC strains (K12, J96, CI5, WT CFT073, or ΔhlyD CFT073) were compared. B. HlyA is responsible for BEC cytotoxicity. The human 5637 BECs were infected with the WT or ΔhlyD CFT073 strains (MOI: 250). After 16 h, the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release were assessed to examine cytotoxicity. C. Determination of sub-lethal MOI for the UPEC CFT073 strain. The human BECs were infected with the WT CFT073 strain, in an MOI-dependent manner. After 16 h, the levels of cytotoxicity were assessed by measuring the levels of LDH release. D. Equal initial burden of UPEC strains. The human 5637 BECs were infected with the WT or ΔhlyD CFT073 strain (MOI: 20), and the intracellular CFU were measured at the 2 h p.i. E. HlyA-mediated escape of UPEC from RAB27b+ vesicles. The human 5637 BECs were infected with magnetic beads labeled with WT or ΔhlyD CFT073 UPEC strain (MOI: 20). At 2 or 5 h p.i., the UPEC-housing vesicles were extracted and immunoblotted using an anti-RAB27b antibody. Loading control of UPEC-containing vesicles was detected with anti-GAPDH antibody. F and G. Enhanced intracellular bacterial burden with less extracellular expulsion was mediated by HlyA. The human 5637 BECs were infected with a 1:1 mixture of WT and ΔhlyD CFT073 strains, following which the (F) intracellular or (G) extracellular CFU were measured, at 4 h p.i. H. Escape of UPEC from RAB27b+ vesicles was mediated by HlyA. The human 5637 BECs were infected with magnetic bead-labeled UPEC WT or ΔhlyD CFT073 strain. After 5 h of infection, the isolated UPEC containing vesicles were treated with gentamicin and bacterial survival was examined. Gentamicin incubation was performed with or without 0.1% Triton X100. Data was normalized by dividing the “CFU of UPEC in each condition” with the “CFU of isolated magnetic bead-UPEC without gentamicin treatment”. Data information: Quantitative data from two to three independent experiments were analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by ordinary one-way ANOVA (A, C), two-way ANOVA (H), or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (B, D, F, G). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ****P<0.0001; n.s, not significant.

At this MOI, a comparable numbers of strains CFT073 and ΔhlyD gained entry into BECs by 2 h p.i. (Fig 3D). To localize the compartments in which they were harbored, WT CFT073 and ΔhlyD mutant strains were first covalently linked to magnetic beads and treated to BECs at a MOI of 20 for 2 h. Thereafter, the plasma membrane of BECs was selectively lysed, and intracellular bacteria were harvested using a magnet. These bacteria and associated host membranes were subjected to western blotting using a RAB27b-specific antibody as a probe. We found that both CFT073 and ΔhlyD strains were associated with comparable amounts of RAB27b membranes, indicating that at this time-point, both bacteria were still harbored in the RAB27b compartments (Fig 3E, top panel). However, at 5 h p.i., although the ΔhlyD strain was still associated with RAB27b, relatively small amounts of RAB27b were still associated with the CFT073 strain (Fig 3E, bottom panel). Complementation with a plasmid encoding phlyD decreased the association of the ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain with RAB27b (S12 Fig). These results indicate that WT CFT073 UPEC could escape these vesicles and enter the cytosol. To determine if escape from the RAB27b compartment was beneficial to UPEC, we compared intracellular bacterial numbers in BECs, at 4 h p.i. and found that intracellular numbers of the CFT073 strain were significantly higher than those of the ΔhlyD strain (Figs 3F and S13). When we investigated the count of extracellular bacteria in BECs infected with the CFT073 and ΔhlyD strains and found that the numbers of extracellular ΔhlyD strain were significantly higher than those of the CFT073 strain (Figs 3G and S14). To confirm that the CFT073 strain is indeed cytosolic, we isolated magnetic bead-coated CFT073 and ΔhlyD strains at 4 h p.i., after they had been exposed to BECs, and performed a gentamicin-protection assay, as described above. The CFT073 strain was susceptible to gentamicin, whereas the ΔhlyD strain was mostly resistant (Figs 3H and S15). The resistance of the ΔhlyD strain to gentamicin is attributable to its membrane-bound status. When both bacteria were exposed to gentamicin after exposure to Triton X-100 treatment, they were highly susceptible to gentamicin (Figs 3H and S15). Taken together, our findings imply that HlyA contributes to the virulence of the CFT073 strain by promoting the escape of bacteria from RAB27b+ vesicles into the cytosol, prior to being expelled from the cell by the autonomous defenses of BECs.

Prolonged persistence of UPEC in BECs is aided by HlyA

Although HlyA promotes the early escape of UPEC from RAB27b+ vesicles, this phenomenon is short-lived, as most cytosolic bacteria are recognized by the cell’s autonomous defense system and recaptured in LC3A/B autophagosomes (Fig 2F). Additionally, these bacteria are once again encapsulated and subsequently shuttled into LAMP1+ lysosomes [12,34]. Thus, to investigate where intracellular UPEC were housed in BECs 24 h p.i., we probed UPEC-infected BECs with antibodies against LAMP1, at different time-points following infection. Over 80% of UPEC were in the LAMP1+ compartment (Fig 4A and 4B), which was supported by the fact that when the magnetically labeled-UPEC were isolated from BECs at 4 and 24 h p.i. and subjected to western blotting, only a few LAMP1+ membranes with intracellular UPEC were observed at 4 h, but these levels significantly increased after 24 h (Fig 4C). Interestingly, when the incubation time was increased to 72 h p.i., little change was observed in the amount of LAMP1+ associated with intracellular UPEC (Fig 4D). This result indicated that intracellular bacterial populations had stabilized and that bacteria had developed a long-term survival capacity within LAMP1+ lysosomes, which are normally bactericidal and degradative intracellular compartments.

Fig 4. UPEC persists in LAMP1+ vesicles by preventing the acidification of LAMP1+ vesicles.

Fig 4

A. UPEC lingers in LAMP1+ vesicles during a prolonged BEC infection. After 24 h of UPEC CI5 infection, the human 5637 BECs were stained with anti-RAB27b (red), anti-UPEC (green), or anti-LAMP1 (blue) antibodies. Representative images are from randomly selected regions. B. UPEC prevalence in LAMP1+ vesicles gradually increased. To quantify the co-localization of UPEC with LAMP1+, the optical fields (100 μm × 100 μm) were randomly selected in the confocal microscopy images and quantified at the indicated time-points. C and D. UPEC can persist in LAMP1+ vesicles for extended periods of time. The human 5637 BECs were infected with magnetic bead-labeled UPEC, and then isolated UPEC-containing vesicles were immunoblotted using anti-LAMP1 antibody. Loading control of UPEC-containing vesicles was detected with anti-GAPDH antibody. E. HlyA blocked the acidification of UPEC-containing vesicles. After infecting human 5637 BECs with WT CFT073 or ΔhlyD strains for 24 h, LysoTracker Red DND-99 dye was applied and then stained with anti-LAMP1 (blue) or anti-UPEC (green) antibodies for confocal microscopy imaging. F. The number of UPEC co-localized with LysoTracke Red dye was quantified in randomly chosen fields of Fig 4E. G. HlyA prevented the recruitment of V-ATPase onto the LAMP1+ vesicles. The human 5637 BECs were infected with magnetic bead-labeled WT or ΔhlyD CFT073 strain for 24 h. The isolated UPEC-containing vesicles were immunoblotted using antibodies targeting LAMP1, Cathepsin D, V-ATPase, or GAPDH. H. Acidification of UPEC-containing LAMP1+ vesicles by V-ATPase. The human 5637 BECs transfected with NS siRNA or V-ATPase siRNA were infected with ΔhlyD strain, and then dyed with LysoTracker after 24 h (red). Anti-UPEC (green) and anti-LAMP1 (blue) antibodies were used to stain the fixed cells. I. V-ATPase is critical for UPEC persistence. The human 5637 BECs were transfected with NS siRNA or V-ATPase siRNA, infected with the UPEC ΔhlyD CFT073 strain for 24 h followed by assessment of bacterial burden. Data information: Quantitative data from two to three independent experiments were analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by ordinary one-way ANOVA (B), or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (F, I). **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Due to the fact that lysosomes are enriched in proteases and lipases, which are highly bactericidal under acidic conditions (pH 4.5–5.5), we examined the pH of lysosomal compartments containing CFT073 UPEC by applying an acidotropic dye to infected BECs harboring the WT UPEC CFT073 strain, at 24 h p.i. We found that very few of the intracellular WT UPEC housed in LAMP1+ compartments stained positive with the dye (Fig 4E and 4F), implying that the survival of WT UPEC within lysosomes was due to their ability to prevent acidification of these compartments. Interestingly, when we examined whether the LAMP1+ compartment harboring the relatively small population of ΔhlyD, harbored in this compartment, became acidic following infection with BECs, the majority of vesicles took up the acidotropic dye (Fig 4E, white arrowheads, and 4F). However, complementation with a plasmid encoding phlyD led to suppression of acidification of LAMP1+ compartments of the ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain (S16 Fig). Therefore, HlyA assists the bacteria in abrogating lysosomal acidification. Additionally, the number of LAMP1+ vesicles harboring the ΔhlyD mutant that co-localized with the acidotropic dye was significantly higher than the number of WT UPEC that co-localized with the acidotropic dye-labeled LAMP1+ vesicles (Fig 4F). These findings suggested that the WT CFT073 strain avoids acidification of the LAMP1+ compartments via HlyA expression.

Inhibition of V-ATPase recruitment by HlyA

LAMP1+ lysosomes become acidic when V-ATPase associates with vesicle membranes to pump protons into the vesicle lumen in an ATP-dependent manner [35,36]. Therefore, we performed western blotting to determine the presence of V-ATPase in WT and ΔhlyD UPEC-harboring lysosomes. The ΔhlyD mutant was associated with high amounts of V-ATPase, whereas only minimal amounts of this enzyme were linked to WT UPEC-associated lysosomes, which could explain the lack of acidification in the compartments (Fig 4G). We also analyzed the content of the lysosomal content marker Cathepsin D in each compartment, to show that there was limited loss of lysosomal integrity, in UPEC-harboring lysosomes. The amount of Cathepsin D in WT UPEC-harboring lysosomes showed limited difference from that of the ΔhlyD mutant-harboring lysosomes (Fig 4G). To further assess whether the loss of V-ATPase in host BECs leads to the loss of LAMP1+ acidification, we examined the acidification of lysosomal compartments containing ΔhlyD mutant within BECs transfected with NS siRNA or V-ATPase siRNA. Confocal microscopy images showed that V-ATPase siRNA-transfected BECs failed to contain the ΔhlyD UPEC in acidic LAMP1+ vesicles (Fig 4H, yellow arrowhead, and S17). Pharmacological inhibition of V-ATPase with Bafilomycin A1 also led to a loss of acidification in UPEC-containing LAMP1+ vesicles (S18 Fig). Since the loss of acidification of bacteria-containing LAMP1+ vesicles is advantageous for bacterial survival (Fig 4I), HlyA potentially plays a critical role in promoting intracellular UPEC persistence in LAMP1+ lysosomes of BECs by preventing the V-ATPase-dependent acidification of lysosomes.

Destabilization of the cytoskeletal structure in bacteria-infected BECs reduces intracellular bacterial killing

Next, we investigated how a toxin that permeabilizes the lipid bilayer can prevent lysosomal acidification. The cytoskeletal structure of cells compartmentalizes intracellular membrane-bound vesicles, such as lysosomes and autophagosomes, with microtubules playing a critical role in controlling vesicle movement, which can result in autophagosome maturation [37]. Autophagosomes formed in the cell periphery move centripetally along microtubule tracks via dynein to fuse with the V-ATPase-bearing lysosome in the juxtanuclear region of the cell, thereby facilitating autophagosome-lysosome fusion [38,39]. We hypothesized that the lack of acidification in LAMP1+ WT UPEC-containing vesicles could be related to defects in cytoskeleton-mediated trafficking of V-ATPase-containing lysosomal vesicles. When we examined the cytoskeletal structure of saline-treated control BECs and bacteria-exposed BECs, we observed that the microtubules were rearranged and less organized in the bacteria-exposed BECs than in the treated control BECs (Fig 5A). However, significant differences were not observed in the total number of cellular microtubules formed between saline-treated and ΔhlyD mutant-infected BECs (Fig 5B), whereas the number was greatly reduced in WT UPEC-infected BECs (Fig 5A, yellow arrowheads). Quantification of the microtubules in UPEC-infected BECs demonstrated that WT UPEC-infected BECs retained significantly lower amounts of microtubules than ΔhlyD mutant-infected BECs (Fig 5B). In view of the reduced number of microtubules found in BECs infected with HlyA-expressing UPEC, we wondered if this was the underlying reason for the lack of association of V-ATPase with bacteria-encapsulating vesicles and their subsequent lack of acidification. To address this, we examined the relationship between cellular microtubule formation, acidification of UPEC-containing vesicles, and intracellular bacterial survival in BECs. We used infected BECs treated with known agents that either disrupt microtubule formation or stabilize it, such as colchicine (10 μM) and paclitaxel (10 μM), respectively. We also employed the ΔhlyD mutant as the infecting bacterial strain because it does not disrupt microtubule formation in infected cells. To monitor the acidification of bacteria-harboring vesicles, we applied an acidotropic dye. Initially, we performed microscopy to examine the effects of colchicine and paclitaxel on ΔhlyD mutant-infected BECs. We discovered that vehicle-treated BECs contained a considerable amount of intact microtubules and that all intracellular bacteria detected in BECs co-localized with the acidotropic dye (Fig 5C, white arrowheads); a similar observation was made in BECs infected with the ΔhlyD mutant following paclitaxel treatment, where robust amounts of highly stabilized microtubules were evident (Fig 5C, white arrowheads). In contrast, the number of microtubules in colchicine-treated and infected BECs was markedly reduced and disrupted (Fig 5C). Furthermore, very few intracellular bacteria co-localized with the acidotropic dye in these cells (Fig 5C). Next, we sought to quantify the level of co-association between internal bacteria and the dye in all three groups. In comparison to untreated BECs, where the percentage of intracellular ΔhlyD mutant co-associated with acidotropic dye was as high as 80%, the number of bacteria co-associated with the acidotropic dye was minimal (less than 10%) in infected BECs treated with colchicine, indicating that microtubule formation is critical for acidification of bacteria-harboring lysosomes (Fig 5D). Given that we observed a limited but significant reduction in the percentage of intracellular bacteria co-associated with an acidotropic dye in BECs subjected to a microtubule stabilizer, it is conceivable that artificially stabilizing the microtubules in infected BECs may also interfere with bacterial acidification within the lysosomes (Fig 5D). However, paclitaxel showed no additional effects.

Fig 5. HlyA-mediated microtubule disruption causes UPEC persistence.

Fig 5

A. HlyA disrupts the microtubule cytoskeletal structure. Human 5637 BECs were infected with WT or ΔhlyD UPEC CFT073 strain for 8 h and then stained with anti-tubulin (red), anti-UPEC (green) antibodies, and phalloidin (blue). Dotted squares have been magnified and depicted in the right-side panels; Yellow arrowheads indicate dismantled fragments of microtubules. B. The optical fields were randomly selected in the microscopic images and were quantified. The mean fluorescence intensity of microtubule staining is shown in Fig 5A. C. The microtubule regulates the acidification of UPEC-containing vesicles. The ΔhlyD mutant strain-infected human 5637 BECs were treated with colchicine (10 μM) or paclitaxel (10 μM). After 24 h, the infected BECs were treated with the LysoTracke Red dye and stained with anti-tubulin (blue) and anti-UPEC (green) antibodies. D. The optical fields were randomly selected in the microscopic images and were quantified. The quantification of UPEC co-localization with Lysotrackers in BECs in Fig 5C. E. The destabilization of microtubules enhanced the bacterial burden on BECs. The human 5637 BECs were infected with the UPEC ΔhlyD strain. After removing the extracellular bacteria by gentamicin treatment, the cells were treated with colchicine (10 μM) or paclitaxel (10 μM) for 16 h and their bacterial burdens were compared. F. Paclitaxel treatment of UPEC-infected BECs reduced the bacterial load. The WT CFT073 strain infected-human 5637 BECs were treated with colchicine (10 μM) or paclitaxel (10 μM) for 16 h, and their bacterial burdens were compared. Data information: Quantitative data from two to three independent experiments were analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by ordinary one-way ANOVA (B, D, E, F). **P<0.01; ****P<0.0001; n.s, not significant. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Next, we investigated whether the destabilization of microtubules and the resulting lack of acidification affected the intracellular survival of ΔhlyD mutants in BECs. Compared to vehicle- or paclitaxel-treated infected BECs, colchicine-treated infected BECs had significantly reduced intracellular bacterial killing (Figs 5E and S19). Given that the disruption of microtubules resulted in reduced intracellular bacterial killing in lysosomes, we hypothesized that stabilizing microtubules in BECs infected with WT HlyA-expressing UPEC using drugs such as paclitaxel would increase intracellular bacterial killing. Indeed, when we tested this notion, we found that treating CFT073-infected BECs with paclitaxel resulted in a marked reduction in the intracellular bacterial numbers, whereas treating infected BECs with colchicine had no significant effect on the intracellular bacterial count (Figs 5F and S20). These findings suggested that disruption of microtubule formation within infected BECs, as is the case with HlyA-expressing UPEC, promotes intracellular bacterial survival, by impeding acidification of bacteria-harboring lysosomes. However, the application of a stabilizer of microtubules, such as paclitaxel, has the potential to reverse the effects of HlyA.

Essential role of HlyA in promoting in vivo UPEC persistence in the mouse bladder

Having observed the role of HlyA in the escape of UPEC from RAB27b compartments into the cytosol and subsequently promoting intracellular persistence after the bacteria were recaptured and trafficked into lysosomes in in vitro assays, we sought to investigate the in vivo relevance of these virulence traits. Prior to conducting in vivo studies, we confirmed the critical role of HlyA in promoting UPEC persistence inside BECs by comparing the persistence capacities of the WT CFT073 strain and the ΔhlyD mutant in BECs using a competitive infection assay. To determine whether the expression of HlyA provided a competitive edge to UPEC, we infected the same BECs with equal numbers of the WT CFT073 and ΔhlyD mutant strains, and then compared their relative capacities to survive within the same BECs. We differentiated the bacterial strains during culture by the distinct antibiotic markers that they carried. WT CFT073 strain exhibited intracellular persistence in BECs similar to that seen previously for strain CI5 (Fig 1D), whereas the ΔhlyD mutant exhibited a limited capacity to persist within BECs (Fig 6A, left panel). Although up to 1 × 103 CFU of WT CFT073 survived within BECs by 18 h p.i., only approximately 50 CFU ΔhlyD mutant were detectable at the same time-point (Fig 6A, left panel). When the same data were presented as the percentage of total bacteria, we found that at 18 h p.i., the WT CFT073 strain made up over 95% of the total intracellular bacteria, while the ΔhlyD mutant made up less than 5% (Fig 6A, right panel). Subsequently, we performed an in vivo assay in which we infected mouse bladders with an equal number (1 × 108 CFU) of the WT CFT073 and ΔhlyD mutant strains. We found that up to 1 × 103 CFU of CFT073 were still detectable in the bladders on day 9 p.i., whereas the ΔhlyD mutant had been cleared (Fig 6B, left panel). When we presented the same data as the percentage of total bacteria surviving in the bladder, it was observed that at 9 d p.i., close to 100% of the UPEC surviving in the bladder were WT CFT073, and very few (or none) ΔhlyD mutant survived (Fig 6B, right panel). Complementation with a plasmid encoding phlyD increased survival in BECs and mouse bladders in comparison to the ΔhlyD mutant strain (S21 Fig). These data suggested that HlyA expression by UPEC is a major contributor to their survival in the bladder. Given that HlyA contributes to intracellular bacterial survival by preventing acidification of bacteria-harboring lysosomes via disruption of cellular microtubules, we examined whether intravesicular administration of the microtubule stabilizer, paclitaxel, would impede intracellular survival. Paclitaxel treatment significantly reduced the burden of HlyA-expressing CFT073 UPEC in infected bladders (Fig 6C). These results suggest that the virulence attributes of HlyA can be abrogated in vivo by promoting the acidification of LAMP1+ vesicles that house intracellular UPEC.

Fig 6. HlyA is responsible for UPEC persistence in the bladder.

Fig 6

A. HlyA enhanced the survival of UPEC in BECs. Intracellular bacterial burden was compared after co-infecting human 5637 BECs with a 1:1 mixture of the WT CFT073 strain and ΔhlyD strain. (Left) Intracellular UPEC numbers. (Right) Percentage of total intracellular UPEC. B. HlyA enhanced the UPEC burden in the mouse bladders. The bacterial burden was compared over a time-course, after co-infecting mouse bladders (C57BL/6J) with a 1:1 mixture of the WT CFT073 strain and ΔhlyD mutant. (Left) Bacterial burden in the infected bladder. (Right) Percentage of total UPEC over 9 days p.i. C. The decreased bacterial burden after paclitaxel treatment in UPEC-infected bladders. WT mice were infected with the WT UPEC CFT073 strain. After 12 h, the bladders were treated with paclitaxel (100 μg), following which two additional treatments were given, one day apart. The bacterial burden was measured one day after the last treatment. Data information: Quantitative data from two to three independent experiments were analyzed. Fig 6A and 6B (right panels) are shown as mean ± SD and rest of the results are shown as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (A, B), or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (C). *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001; n.s, not significant.

Discussion

Previous UTI models in mice have revealed the capacity of UPEC to persist in bladders following acute infection for periods exceeding three weeks and long after bladder inflammation has subsided [40,41]. The persistence capacity of UPEC in the bladder has gained attention, as it could be the insidious basis for UTI recurrence in patients. Moreover, UPEC persistence in the bladder is a unique phenomenon, as it is not observed in the kidneys, even after repeated bouts of UTI [41]. Hence, our interest in investigating the basis for UPEC persistence in the mouse bladder following UTI and within cultures of human BECs in vitro.

Our results have revealed that UPEC persistence within human BECs is closely associated with their encapsulation within LAMP1+ lysosomal compartments that failed to acidify even after prolonged incubation. This capacity of UPEC to prevent acidification of LAMP1+ lysosomes was linked to the specific expression of HlyA, as LAMP1+ compartments harboring the ΔhlyD mutant but not WT UPEC were found to become acidic and were associated with the loss of bacterial viability. Importantly, the abrogation of acidification in lysosomal compartments harboring WT UPEC correlated with the limited recruitment of V-ATPase, a proton pump that serves to acidify lysosomes. Acidification of phagosomes is achieved by the trafficking of V-ATPase proton pump-containing vesicles toward them. The lysosomal proteinases found in lysosomes and V-ATPase are typically found in distinct compartments, but when bacteria bearing vesicles become acidified, they acquire V-ATPase through the fusion of V-ATPase vesicles [42,43]. Since these V-ATPase proton pumps are typically trafficked between vesicles along microtubules [4446], disruption of microtubules in infected BECs by HlyA could explain why the compartments harboring WT UPECs fail to acidify, resulting in bacterial survival within the compartments harboring the ΔhlyD mutant. Moreover, while the BECs harboring the ΔhlyD mutant displayed minimal disruption of their tubular architecture, there was marked disruption of this architecture in BECs harboring WT UPEC. The treatment of the BECs harboring the mutant with paclitaxel, a microtubule stabilizer, promoted acidification of the bacteria-harboring vesicles, leading to loss of bacterial viability; this further validates that the loss of microtubule organization is a critical determinant of bacterial persistence within BECs. Conversely, when the ΔhlyD mutant-harboring BECs were treated with colchicine, a disruptor of microtubules, reduced acidification of the vesicles and enhancement of intracellular bacterial viability was observed. It is noteworthy that paclitaxel is a well-known anti-cancer drug and therefore could potentially be employed as a therapy against UTIs. We found that transurethral administration into UPEC infected mouse bladders significantly reduced the UPEC load in the bladder. Although paclitaxel has been reported to evoke side effects such as rash, hives, itching, swelling, etc. [47] in cancer patients, it is unlikely that this drug will cause similar side effects in UTI patients if it is administered transurethrally.

Production of HlyA by UPEC has been previously reported to contribute to significant cytotoxicity observed in the superficial epithelium lining the bladder during the early and acute phases of infection [16,2325]. In addition to the extracellular secretion of HlyA by UPEC, the contribution of intracellularly secreted HlyA and their regulation are crucial to our understanding of HlyA-mediated pathogenesis [48,49]. In this study, we observed that HlyA is also essential for establishing a persistent or chronic UPEC infection. The critical role of HlyA in promoting bacterial persistence was validated by the results obtained from our mouse UTI model, which showed that after co-infection of the bladder with comparable numbers of WT and ΔhlyD mutant bacteria, by day 9 p.i., all surviving bacteria detected in the bladder were WT UPEC. Presumably, the ΔhlyD mutant cannot persist without the capacity to neutralize LAMP1+ vesicles within BECs. Microtubule stabilization within BECs is essential for eliminating the UPEC from the mouse bladder, which is proved by the fact that intravesical instillation of paclitaxel could significantly reduce bacterial persistence in the bladder. Although we have not shown how HlyA disrupts cellular microtubules or enters the cytoplasm of the host to dismantle the cytoskeleton, HlyA is known to indirectly disrupt the cytoskeletal structure by inducing the degradation of paxillin, which reorganizes the actin cytoskeleton and is essential for cell adhesion, spreading, and migration [25,50,51]. It has also been suggested that paxillin degradation is an early initiating event in the HlyA mediated cytotoxicity of the superficial epithelium mentioned earlier [25]. HlyA expressing UPEC possess the remarkable ability to cause significant cytotoxicity and inflammation, including robust neutrophil recruitment early in the course of infection and subsequent promotion of intracellular persistence within BECs when bladder inflammation has subsided. This could suggest an innate capacity of UPEC to tightly regulate HlyA expression. Indeed, the HlyA gene in UPEC is under the regulatory control of the CpxRA stress response system [24]. Presumably, CpxRA is responsible for up-regulating HlyA expression to achieve successful infection of the bladder, in spite of the robust innate immune response of the host, and later, when the inflammation has subsided, adjusting HlyA expression to promote intracellular bacterial persistence and possibly reemergence of the infection. Since our in vitro studies suggest that much of the trafficking of UPEC between RAB27b+ and LAMP1+ vesicles occurs in the first 8 h of UPEC infection, we suspect these events occur before the proposed QIR phase [9] and the formation of intracellular bacterial communities [15] which are other intracellular phases of UPEC existence in BECs.

Our studies have confirmed earlier studies suggesting that UPEC entry into BECs involves coopting the endocytic properties of RAB27b+ fusiform vesicles [8]. These fusiform vesicles serve an important physiologic function by fusing to the apical surface of the superficial epithelium of the bladder with the help of VAMP8/endobrevin to facilitate bladder expansion [52]. Following entry into BECs, RAB27b encased UPEC follow a circuitous path dictated in part by the virulent traits of the bacteria and the corresponding counter measures instituted by the host cell. Our results reveal that the early cytosolic escape of UPEC from RAB27b+ vesicles is critically mediated by HlyA. We found that at 5 h p.i., while most intracellular ΔhlyD UPEC were still associated with RAB27b+ vesicles, very few of the WT UPEC remained associated with the fusiform vesicles. This HlyA-mediated escape into the cytosol appeared to be beneficial to UPEC, as the intracellular counts of WT UPEC in BECs were significantly higher than the corresponding numbers of ΔhlyD UPEC. It is not known why HlyA-producing E. coli escape RAB27b+ compartments and enter the cytosol, whereas the same does not occur when the same bacteria are harbored in LAMP1+ lysosomes. We suspect that the heterogeneous Ca2+ concentrations in the vesicles are directly associated with HlyA activity. Biochemical analysis of HlyA showed that the RTX domain of HlyA possesses six Ca2+-binding sites essential for folding, which are responsible for its biological activity [53]. The secreted HlyA in the early endosome, which retains a similar level of Ca2+ concentration as the cytoplasm, may have membrane lytic activity [54]. Therefore, the Ca2+-bound active form of HlyA enables UPEC to escape from the RAB27b+ vesicles into the cytoplasm. However, Ca2+ levels rapidly deplete during endosomal vesicle trafficking, which may hinder the formation of a fully active complex, owing to a deficiency of Ca2+ in HlyA [54]. Therefore, it is conceivable that HlyA activity within RAB27b+ and lysosomal vesicles may be regulated by the heterogeneous integrity of their Ca2+ concentrations. The release of HlyA producing UPEC from RAB27b vesicles into the cytosol without impacting cell viability raises the question of why vesicular membranes appear more susceptible to HlyA than the plasma membrane. Conceivably, the plasma membrane is more resistant to HlyA than the vesicular membrane because of differences in their cholesterol composition or in membrane-embedded proteins [55,56]. It must be emphasized that many of the findings described here have involved the use of a human bladder epithelial cell line, which lacks some of the attributes of primary epithelial cells such as the formation of plaques on the apical surface of urothelial cells [12,57,58]. Thus, there is a need to validate our current findings in physiologically more relevant primary bladder epithelial cells or human urothelial organoid [59].

Finally, our study reveals a distinct virulence activity mediated by HlyA produced by UPEC strains that appears to promote bacterial persistence in the bladder. This finding is in agreement with the finding that the expression of HlyA among UPEC isolates from recurrent UTI patients is markedly higher than isolates from first- or second-time UTI patients [26]. The strategy employed by UPEC to prevent the acidification of lysosomes is not unlike the tactics utilized by well-known intracellular pathogens such as Salmonella spp. and Mycobacteria spp. which prevent the fusion of bacteria-harboring vesicles with lysosomes containing degradative enzymes [6062]. In view of the capacity of UPEC to promote bacterial persistence in the bladder through the production of HlyA, this virulence factor could be a vaccine candidate, as vaccines are being contemplated to combat recurrent UTIs. Evoking HlyA targeting antibodies and cytotoxic T cells could potentially be highly effective in abrogating the cytotoxic actions of UPEC during the early phases of infection and in preventing the long-term persistence of UPEC in BECs. Currently, patients experiencing recurrent UTIs are often subjected to prolonged antibiotic treatment, which has side effects such as toxicity to major organs and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Our finding that stabilization of cellular microtubules within the bladder is sufficient to promote clearance of persistent bacteria in the bladder highlights a promising new strategy for the treatment of UTIs. Conceivably, combining antibiotic treatment with transurethral administration of paclitaxel may have a synergistic effect in achieving clearance of HlyA+ UPEC from the infected bladder.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The animal-associated experimental procedures were performed with the approval of the Korea University Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee. Bladder biopsies were taken from recurrent UTI patients who had cystoscopy-confirmed IC/BPS. The human bladder sample study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital. All human subjects provided informed written consent prior to participating in this study. Urine was cultured from these patients to establish the presence of uropathogens.

Bacterial strains

UPEC CI5 [6365], J96, and CFT073 wild-type [16] were used for infection as HlyA+ UPEC strain. CFT073 ΔhlyD mutant strain [16] was used as HlyA- UPEC strain. CFT073 wild-type and CFT073 ΔhlyD mutant strains were a generous gift from Dr. Mobley at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. E. coli K12 strain MG1655 sub-strain was employed as nonpathogenic bacteria control. All the strains were statically grown in Luria–Bertani broth for 16–18 h at 37°C. Bacterial colonies were counted by plating on MacConkey agar plates with an overnight incubation at 37°C.

Bladder cell line and mice

Human 5637 bladder epithelial cells (ATCC, HTB-9) were grown in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) with 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10% FBS (Sigma) and 0.225% glucose in a 5% CO2, 37°C incubator. Eight- to ten-week-old female C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories.

In vivo mouse infection, CFU count assay, and paclitaxel administration

Anesthetized mice were inoculated transurethrally with 1 × 108 UPEC, using the indicated UPEC strains. The infected mice were sacrificed at the desired times post-infection. While examining the therapeutic effect of paclitaxel (Sigma), 5 mg/kg of paclitaxel dissolved in 50% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400 solution (made in 0.9% saline solution) was administered intravesically three times with a one-day interval between administrations. The bladders were dissected and suspended in PBS, followed by homogenization using a bead-beating homogenizer. The UPEC CFU counts in the homogenized bladders were obtained by plating diluted homogenate on MacConkey agar plates for overnight incubation at 37°C. To further demonstrate the bacterial burden in the bladder, the in vivo results were expressed in CFU/mL unit as shown in S22 Fig. The detection limit of CFU in mouse bladders was 100 CFU per bladder.

Human tissue biopsy and immunostaining

Human bladder biopsies were processed following formaldehyde fixation. Tissues-embedded in paraffin were sliced at a thickness of 5 μm and deparaffinized. To eliminate antigen masking caused by formalin, heat-mediated antigen retrieval in sodium citrate buffer was conducted. After blocking the tissue slices with a solution comprising 10% donkey serum, 0.35% Triton X-100, and 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS, the samples were treated with anti-LAMP1 (Abcam, H4A3), anti-E-cadherin (BD Biosciences, 610181), or anti-E. coli (Bio-Rad, OBT0986) antibodies. Secondary antibodies linked to a fluorochrome (Jackson ImmunoResearch) was utilized to visualize the target.

Antibodies and chemical reagents

Antibodies: anti-LC3A/B (Cell Signaling, 4108), anti-ATG5 (Cell Signaling, 2630), anti-BECLIN1 (Novus Biologicals, NB500-249), anti-LAMP1, anti-RAB27b (IBL–America, 18973), anti-Fim H (CUSABIO, CSB-PA362349ZA01ENV), anti-Gapdh (GeneTex, GTX627408), anti-β-actin antibodies (Abcam, 8224), Anti-Endobrevin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Sc-166820), anti-Ly6G (BD Biosciences, clone 1A8), anti-CD11b (BD Biosciences, clone M1/70), or anti-CD45 (BD Biosciences, clone 30-F11) antibodies. Densitometry graphs showing relative changes in protein expression normalized to control were added in S23 Fig. Reagents: Gentamicin (Gibco, 15750–078), Paclitaxel (Sigma-Aldrich, T7191), Colchicine (Sigma-Aldrich, C9754), Bafilomycin A1 (LC Laboratories, B-1080), or nucleus staining (DAPI containing Prolong Diamond Antifade mounting solution, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Human 5637 BECs were seeded on glass coverslips at approximately 1 × 105 cells/well in tissue culture-treated 24 well plates for a period of 16 h. Seeded cells were infected with different UPEC strains at MOIs ranging from 20–400 for a period of 1 h. After infecting the cells, gentamicin (200 μg/ml) and methyl D-mannose (0.5%) were added to the media and incubated for 30 min to remove the extracellular UPECs. D-mannose to media prevents UPEC from reattaching and entering the BECs. Prolonged incubation was performed in the media containing gentamicin (50 μg/ml) and methyl D-mannose (0.5%). The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at relevant time points in the experiment for 20 min at RT. The fixed cells were permeabilized and blocked with 0.1% saponin in 1% BSA for 1 h. The blocked cells were treated with a primary antibody and followed by appropriate fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies. The examination of slides was performed using a Zeiss LSM800 confocal microscope or Lecia Thunder imager. The processing of images or quantification was determined using the image processing software Image J (National Institutes of Health).

Intracellular CFU count assay

2 × 105 human 5637 BECs were seeded in a well of 24-well plates for 16–20 h. UPEC was added to each well at the intended MOI, followed by centrifugation for 4 min at 1200 rpm. After 1 h of infection, the medium was replaced with fresh media containing gentamicin (200 μg/ml) for 30 min. The gentamicin concentration in the media was reduced to 50 μg/ml for the remainder of the experiment. At relevant time points, the cells were washed thrice with PBS. To lyse the cells, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS was used, and treated cells were scraped, diluted, and plated onto MacConkey agar plates. Counted colonies represented the quantity of invaded UPEC.

Extracellular CFU count assay

Approximately 2 × 105 human 5637 BECs were seeded per well in a 24 well plate for 16–20 h. UPEC was added to each well at the appropriate MOI, followed by a 4 min spin at 1200 rpm. After an hour of infection, the medium was replaced with 200 μg/ml gentamicin in RPMI medium for 30 min at 37°C. Post gentamicin treatment, a bacteriostatic medium consisting of 0.5% mannose and 62.5 μg/ml sulphamethoxazole (SMZ) in RPMI medium was used and replaced every hour during the experiment. The replaced media at the end of each hour was pooled and spun at 3000 rpm for 10 min to pellet the bacteria and suspended them in PBS. The suspension was plated on MacConkey agar for extracellular colony counts at each time point in the experiment.

Magnetic labeling of live bacteria

Live bacteria were labeled using BioMag carboxyl magnetite particles (Bangs Laboratories, BM570). The stock suspension of particles was initially spun down at 1000 g for 1 min and 900 μL of the supernatant was used for the experiment. The BioMag particles were then washed twice with pH 5.2, 0.1 M MES buffer (2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulphonic acid) using a magnetic rack (BD IMagnet, BD Biosciences, 552311), followed by the addition of 4 mg EDAC (1-ethyl-3- (3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide). The BioMag suspension was rotated (12 rpm) in an RT incubator for 15 min to chemically activate the particles. The suspension was washed twice with PBS on the magnetic rack. The particles were then empirically mixed with live bacteria (0.5 × 109 CFU) in a total volume of 1 ml PBS. The particle-bacteria suspension was further incubated on a rotator (12 rpm) for 30 min at 37°C. Blocking with 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min in a rotator at RT followed. Centrifugation at 200 g for 1min allowed for the removal of the larger aggregates.

Intracellular vesicle isolation using magnetically labeled bacteria

Human 5637 BECs were seeded in T-150 plates and incubated at 37°C till 100% confluency was achieved. UPECs were magnetically labeled with the protocol previously mentioned. Human 5637 BECs were then infected with the magnetically labeled bacteria at the appropriate MOI for 2 h at 37°C, followed by a 200 μg/ml gentamicin treatment for 1 h. A lower concentration of 50 μg/ml of gentamicin was applied for the remainder of the experiment. At relevant time points, the cells were trypsinized with a 0.5% trypsin solution. The pelleted cells were suspended in ice-cold homogenization buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.25 M sucrose, 0.1% gelatin, and mammalian & bacterial protease inhibitors. Passing the cells through 25 G and 30 G needles 7–10 times each, on ice, lysed the BEC membrane. The lysate tubes were loaded onto a magnetic separation rack for 2–4 h at 4°C till a brown smear was noticed on the side of the tubes facing the magnetic separation rack. The Brown smear was suspended in fresh chilled homogenization buffer and loaded onto the magnetic rack for 30 min. This step was repeated thrice, followed by the suspension of the isolated vesicles in PBS for further analysis.

Transient knockdown or overexpression of genes in human 5637 BECs

100 pmols of siRNA targeting the desired host molecules or non-specific siRNA duplexes (Ambion) with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen) were used to transfect 0.5 × 105 BECs. After 24–36 h, transfected cells were used for assays of interest. The knockdown was confirmed via Western blot analysis using antibodies against the target molecule. In this study the following siRNA sequences were used: siATG5 Sense: 5’CAAUCCCAUCCAGAGUUGCUUGUGA 3’, antisense: 5’UCACAAGCAACUCUGGAU G GGAUUG 3’); siATP6V1A (V-ATPase siRNA) Sense: 5’ GAGCUUGAAUUUGAAGGUGUAdT dT -3’, antisense: (5’ UACACCUUCAAAUUCAAGCUCdTdT 3’). pEGFP-LC3 plasmid (Addgene, Plasmid #24920) was used to overexpress LC3B by using ScreenFect transfection reagent (Fujifilm Wako Chemicals).

Gentamicin protection assay

UPEC was magnetically labeled using the methods described above. UPEC- housing vesicles from infected human BECs were isolated at desired times post-infection using the previously mentioned protocol. The isolated vesicles were suspended in 200 μg/ml gentamicin containing PBS for 30 min at 37°C. The solution was spun at 3000 g to pellet the UPEC, followed by suspension of the pellet in PBS and plating on MacConkey media plates. The positive control consisted of treating the isolated vesicles with 200 μg/ml gentamicin and 0.1% Triton X100 in PBS solution for 30 min at 37°C.

Hemolysis assay

Red blood cells (RBCs) were isolated from blood donations. RBCs were suspended in an ACD (acid-citrate-dextrose) buffer containing 39 mM citric acid, 75 mM sodium citrate, and 135 mM dextrose at pH 7.4. In a 1:1 ratio, the RBC suspension was combined with the supernatant of UPEC strains grown overnight in LB broth. The combined suspension was incubated at 37°C for 120 min while shaking (250 rpm). This was followed by a 10min, 1000 g spin at 4°C. The optical density (OD) at 540 nm was determined for the supernatants using a spectrophotometer. Treatment with 0.1% Triton X100 was used as the complete hemolysis for the calculation of the percentage.

Cytotoxicity assay

To analyze the cytotoxicity of UPEC strains on human 5737 BECs, the CytoTox 96 non-radioactive cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega) was used. Human 5637 BECs were seeded in 96-well cell culture plates. The following day, UPEC strains were spun at 300 g to treat them. After one hour of incubation, gentamicin-containing medium (1 μg/ml) was used for additional culture. The release of lactate dehydrogenase from the culture supernatant was measured after 16 h of incubation. Lysed BECs were used to determine the percentage of total lactate dehydrogenase released into the supernatant [66].

Complementation of hlyD gene

Full-length hlyD was amplified from CFT073 strain and cloned into pWSK29 plasmid. The hlyD cloning primer sequences: forward 5’ GCCGGATCCATGAAAACATGGTTAATGGGG 3’, rear 5’ CGGCCTCGAGTTAACGCTCATGTAAACTTTC’. Then, ΔhlyD CFT073 strain was transformed by electroporation with 100 μg/ml carbenicillin for selection to generate ΔhlyD(phlyD) UPEC strain.

Quantification and statistical analysis

The data was analyzed, and graphics were created using Prism (GraphPad Software). P values less than 0.05 were considered significant statistically. Each graph (in vitro experiments) has dots that represent samples from two to three independent experiments. To determine statistical significance, we utilized the unpaired Student’s t-test, the one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, or Kruskal-Wallis test. The dots on each graph (mouse experiments) indicate the number of mice used to obtain bladders. The two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare the bar graphs as described in the figure legends.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Bacterial burden in the infected mouse bladders at 8 weeks of post infection.

C57BL/6 female mice were infected by intravesical instillation of the UPEC CI5 strain and bacterial CFUs in the infected bladders were measured at 8 weeks post-infection.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. A gating strategy to define the neutrophil population in Fig 1C.

Ly6G+ CD11b+ CD45+ cells in the mouse bladders were counted by flow cytometry.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Presence of persistent UPEC in human bladder tissue.

Bladder biopsies were obtained from recurrent UTI patients or patients with no history of UTI in past two year. These tissues were immunostained for UPEC (E. coli, green), urothelium (E-cadherin, blue), lysosomal vesicle (LAMP1, red), and nucleus (DAPI, gray). Yellow arrowheads indicate UPEC. “L”: lumen of the bladder. Scale bars: 10 μm.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. UPEC localization in LC3 autophagosome without the presence of RAB27b.

(A) Human 5637 BECs were infected with UPEC CI5 strain for 8 h and were stained with anti-LC3A/B (red) and anti-UPEC (green) antibodies. (B, C) Human 5637 BECs were transfected with pEGFP-LC3 (green) to specifically trace LC3 autophagy component. Next day, the cells were infected with UPEC CI5 strain. After 4 or 8 h p.i., cells were stained with anti-E. coli (red) and anti-RAB27b (blue) antibodies. Representative images are from randomly selected regions. Scale bars: 10 μm.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. No significant difference in the intracellular bacterial numbers of labeled and nonlabelled bacteria.

Human 5637 BECs were treated with magnetic bead-labeled UPEC CI5 strain or UPEC CI5 strain (no labeled beads). After 2 h of incubation with gentamicin to remove extracellular UPEC, intracellular CFU were examined. ns: not significant.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Isolated magnetic bead-labeled UPEC still express FimH and are associated with Rab27+.

Human 5637 BECs were incubated with magnetic beads alone or with magnetic bead-labeled UPEC. After two hours of incubation, isolated beads or cell lysates from each condition were analyzed for the expression of RAB27b, Endobrevin/VAMP8, and FimH. Gapdh was used for loading control of UPEC-containing vesicle.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Intracellular vesicle isolation using magnetically labeled bacteria.

Human 5637 BECs were seeded and infected with magnetically labeled UPECs. After lysing cells by passing the cells through needles, UPEC-containing vesicles were isolated with magnet. Isolated vesicles containing UPECs were treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 or saline, then incubated with gentamicin before plating on McConkey agar plates.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. CFU count in absolute numbers for Fig 2E.

Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Decreased expression of ATG5 upon the siRNA transfection.

The 5637 BECs transfected with NS siRNA or ATG5 siRNA and immunoblotted using an anti-ATG5 antibody to examine the expression of ATG5. Anti-β-actin antibody was used for a loading control.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. CFU count in absolute numbers for Fig 2G.

Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

(TIF)

S11 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 2H.

Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

(TIF)

S12 Fig. Escape of ΔhlyD UPECs from RAB27b vesicles after complementation.

ΔhlyD UPEC strain was transformed with phlyD plasmid to generate ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain. Human 5637 BECs were infected with magnetic beads labeled ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain or ΔhlyD with empty plasmid. After 5 h of infection, isolated UPEC-containing vesicles were analyzed for the expression of RAB27b. Gapdh was used for loading control of UPEC-containing vesicles.

(TIF)

S13 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 3F.

Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

(TIF)

S14 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 3G.

Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

(TIF)

S15 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 3H.

Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

(TIF)

S16 Fig. Deacidification of ΔhlyD UPECs after complementation of hlyD gene.

ΔhlyD UPEC strain was transformed with phlyD plasmid to generate ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain. Human 5637 BECs were infected with ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain or ΔhlyD with empty plasmid. After 24 h of infection, BECs were dyed with LysoTracker (red) to trace the acidification of UPEC-containing vesicles. Anti-UPEC (green) and anti-LAMP1 (blue) antibodies were used to stain the fixed cells. Quantitative data from two independent experiments were analyzed. Data are shown as mean ±SD. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. ****P<0.0001. Scale bar: 10 μm.

(TIF)

S17 Fig. Decreased expression of V-ATPase upon the siRNA transfection.

The 5637 BECs transfected with NS siRNA or V-ATPase siRNA (25, 50, or 100 pmol) and immunoblotted using an anti-V-ATPase antibody to examine the expression of V-ATPase. Anti-β-actin antibody was used for a loading control.

(TIF)

S18 Fig. Pharmacological inhibition of V-ATPase.

Human 5637 BECs were infected with UPEC ΔhlyD strain, and extracellular UPEC was removed by gentamycin treatment. Then, infected BECs were incubated in media containing Bafilomycin A1, a known pharmacological inhibitor of V-ATPase (vacuolar H+-ATPase), at 100 nM concentration. After 24 h post-treatment, LysoTracker Red dye was applied and then stained with anti-LAMP1 (blue) or anti-UPEC (green) antibodies for confocal microscopy imaging. The number of UPEC co-localized with LysoTracker Red dye was quantified in randomly chosen fields. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. ****P<0.0001. Scale bar: 10 μm.

(TIF)

S19 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 5E.

Data were analyzed by an ordinary one-way ANOVA (B, D, E, F). **P<0.01; n.s, not significant.

(TIF)

S20 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 5F.

Data were analyzed by an ordinary one-way ANOVA. **P<0.01; n.s, not significant.

(TIF)

S21 Fig. Recovery of UPEC persistency after complementation on ΔhlyD UPEC strain.

ΔhlyD UPEC strain was transformed with phlyD plasmid to generate ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain. (A) Human 5637 BECs were co-infected with equal numbers of the ΔhlyD and ΔhlyD(phlyD) strains, and intracellular UPEC numbers were examined at indicated time points. (B) After infection with these UPEC strains on human BECs, the cells were stained with anti-tubulin (red), anti-UPEC (green), and anti-LAMP1 (blue) antibodies for confocal microscopic imaging. (C) C57BL/6J was co-infected with equal numbers of the ΔhlyD and ΔhlyD(phlyD) strains and bacterial burden in mouse bladders were examined. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (A, C). *P<0.05; **P<0.01, Scale bar: 10 μm.

(TIF)

S22 Fig. The mouse bacterial burden in the bladder was presented as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).

The detection limit of CFU in mouse bladders was 100 CFU per bladder.

(TIF)

S23 Fig. Densitometry of western blot data.

Representative results from two to three independent western blots were selected and presented.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank H. Mobley for providing the UPEC strains. V. Friedrich provided critical manuscript review.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the following grants; the National Research Foundation of Korea grant (NRF-2020R1C1C1003257) to HWC, the US National Institutes of Health grant (K12DK100024) to HWC, the internal grant of Korea University to HWC, and the US National Institutes of Health grants (R01DK121032 and R01DK121969) to SNA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Patton JP, Nash DB, Abrutyn E. Urinary tract infection: economic considerations. Med Clin North Am. 1991;75(2):495–513. Epub 1991/03/01. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30466-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dielubanza EJ, Schaeffer AJ. Urinary tract infections in women. Med Clin North Am. 2011;95(1):27–41. Epub 2010/11/26. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2010.08.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hunstad DA, Justice SS. Intracellular lifestyles and immune evasion strategies of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010;64:203–21. Epub 2010/09/10. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134258 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brauner A, Jacobson SH, Kuhn I. Urinary Escherichia coli causing recurrent infections—a prospective follow-up of biochemical phenotypes. Clin Nephrol. 1992;38(6):318–23. Epub 1992/12/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Foxman B, Brown P. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: transmission and risk factors, incidence, and costs. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2003;17(2):227–41. Epub 2003/07/10. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(03)00005-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anger J, Lee U, Ackerman AL, Chou R, Chughtai B, Clemens JQ, et al. Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: AUA/CUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):282–9. Epub 2019/05/02. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000296 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Song J, Bishop BL, Li G, Grady R, Stapleton A, Abraham SN. TLR4-mediated expulsion of bacteria from infected bladder epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(35):14966–71. Epub 2009/08/27. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900527106 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2736405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bishop BL, Duncan MJ, Song J, Li G, Zaas D, Abraham SN. Cyclic AMP-regulated exocytosis of Escherichia coli from infected bladder epithelial cells. Nat Med. 2007;13(5):625–30. Epub 2007/04/10. doi: 10.1038/nm1572 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mysorekar IU, Hultgren SJ. Mechanisms of uropathogenic Escherichia coli persistence and eradication from the urinary tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(38):14170–5. Epub 2006/09/14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602136103 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1564066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kerrn MB, Struve C, Blom J, Frimodt-Moller N, Krogfelt KA. Intracellular persistence of Escherichia coli in urinary bladders from mecillinam-treated mice. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2005;55(3):383–6. Epub 2005/02/01. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen Y, Guo X, Deng FM, Liang FX, Sun W, Ren M, et al. Rab27b is associated with fusiform vesicles and may be involved in targeting uroplakins to urothelial apical membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):14012–7. Epub 2003/11/20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2436350100 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC283537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miao Y, Li G, Zhang X, Xu H, Abraham SN. A TRP Channel Senses Lysosome Neutralization by Pathogens to Trigger Their Expulsion. Cell. 2015;161(6):1306–19. Epub 2015/06/02. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.009 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4458218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nathan C, Shiloh MU. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in the relationship between mammalian hosts and microbial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(16):8841–8. Epub 2000/08/02. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8841 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC34021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carrasco-Marin E, Madrazo-Toca F, de los Toyos JR, Cacho-Alonso E, Tobes R, Pareja E, et al. The innate immunity role of cathepsin-D is linked to Trp-491 and Trp-492 residues of listeriolysin O. Mol Microbiol. 2009;72(3):668–82. Epub 2009/04/25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06673.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eto DS, Sundsbak JL, Mulvey MA. Actin-gated intracellular growth and resurgence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8(4):704–17. Epub 2006/03/22. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00691.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mobley HL, Green DM, Trifillis AL, Johnson DE, Chippendale GR, Lockatell CV, et al. Pyelonephritogenic Escherichia coli and killing of cultured human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells: role of hemolysin in some strains. Infection and immunity. 1990;58(5):1281–9. Epub 1990/05/01. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.5.1281-1289.1990 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC258621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rippere-Lampe KE, O’Brien AD, Conran R, Lockman HA. Mutation of the gene encoding cytotoxic necrotizing factor type 1 (cnf(1)) attenuates the virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infection and immunity. 2001;69(6):3954–64. Epub 2001/05/12. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.6.3954-3964.2001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC98434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.O’Hanley P, Lalonde G, Ji G. Alpha-hemolysin contributes to the pathogenicity of piliated digalactoside-binding Escherichia coli in the kidney: efficacy of an alpha-hemolysin vaccine in preventing renal injury in the BALB/c mouse model of pyelonephritis. Infection and immunity. 1991;59(3):1153–61. Epub 1991/03/01. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.3.1153-1161.1991 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC258381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nagy G, Altenhoefer A, Knapp O, Maier E, Dobrindt U, Blum-Oehler G, et al. Both alpha-haemolysin determinants contribute to full virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strain 536. Microbes Infect. 2006;8(8):2006–12. Epub 2006/06/22. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.02.029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sandberg T, Kaijser B, Lidin-Janson G, Lincoln K, Orskov F, Orskov I, et al. Virulence of Escherichia coli in relation to host factors in women with symptomatic urinary tract infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(8):1471–6. Epub 1988/08/01. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1471-1476.1988 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC266644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Orskov I, Svanborg Eden C, Orskov F. Aerobactin production of serotyped Escherichia coli from urinary tract infections. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1988;177(1):9–14. Epub 1988/01/01. doi: 10.1007/BF00190306 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O’Hanley P, Low D, Romero I, Lark D, Vosti K, Falkow S, et al. Gal-Gal binding and hemolysin phenotypes and genotypes associated with uropathogenic Escherichia coli. N Engl J Med. 1985;313(7):414–20. Epub 1985/08/15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198508153130704 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Smith YC, Rasmussen SB, Grande KK, Conran RM, O’Brien AD. Hemolysin of uropathogenic Escherichia coli evokes extensive shedding of the uroepithelium and hemorrhage in bladder tissue within the first 24 hours after intraurethral inoculation of mice. Infection and immunity. 2008;76(7):2978–90. Epub 2008/04/30. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00075-08 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2446707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nagamatsu K, Hannan TJ, Guest RL, Kostakioti M, Hadjifrangiskou M, Binkley J, et al. Dysregulation of Escherichia coli alpha-hemolysin expression alters the course of acute and persistent urinary tract infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(8):E871–80. Epub 2015/02/13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500374112 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4345586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dhakal BK, Mulvey MA. The UPEC pore-forming toxin alpha-hemolysin triggers proteolysis of host proteins to disrupt cell adhesion, inflammatory, and survival pathways. Cell host & microbe. 2012;11(1):58–69. Epub 2012/01/24. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.12.003 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3266558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marrs CF, Zhang L, Tallman P, Manning SD, Somsel P, Raz P, et al. Variations in 10 putative uropathogen virulence genes among urinary, faecal and peri-urethral Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51(2):138–42. Epub 2002/02/28. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-2-138 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Martinez JJ, Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Pinkner JS, Hultgren SJ. Type 1 pilus-mediated bacterial invasion of bladder epithelial cells. EMBO J. 2000;19(12):2803–12. Epub 2000/06/17. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.12.2803 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC203355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Choi HW, Bowen SE, Miao Y, Chan CY, Miao EA, Abrink M, et al. Loss of Bladder Epithelium Induced by Cytolytic Mast Cell Granules. Immunity. 2016;45(6):1258–69. Epub 2016/12/13. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.11.003 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5177478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhao S, Torii S, Yokota-Hashimoto H, Takeuchi T, Izumi T. Involvement of Rab27b in the regulated secretion of pituitary hormones. Endocrinology. 2002;143(5):1817–24. Epub 2002/04/17. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.5.8823 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ichimura Y, Kirisako T, Takao T, Satomi Y, Shimonishi Y, Ishihara N, et al. A ubiquitin-like system mediates protein lipidation. Nature. 2000;408(6811):488–92. Epub 2000/12/02. doi: 10.1038/35044114 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nishida Y, Arakawa S, Fujitani K, Yamaguchi H, Mizuta T, Kanaseki T, et al. Discovery of Atg5/Atg7-independent alternative macroautophagy. Nature. 2009;461(7264):654–8. Epub 2009/10/02. doi: 10.1038/nature08455 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Welch RA, Dellinger EP, Minshew B, Falkow S. Haemolysin contributes to virulence of extra-intestinal E. coli infections. Nature. 1981;294(5842):665–7. Epub 1981/12/17. doi: 10.1038/294665a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Felmlee T, Pellett S, Lee EY, Welch RA. Escherichia coli hemolysin is released extracellularly without cleavage of a signal peptide. J Bacteriol. 1985;163(1):88–93. Epub 1985/07/01. doi: 10.1128/jb.163.1.88-93.1985 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC219084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mizushima N. Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev. 2007;21(22):2861–73. Epub 2007/11/17. doi: 10.1101/gad.1599207 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stevens TH, Forgac M. Structure, function and regulation of the vacuolar (H+)-ATPase. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 1997;13:779–808. Epub 1997/01/01. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.779 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mindell JA. Lysosomal acidification mechanisms. Annual review of physiology. 2012;74:69–86. Epub 2012/02/18. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142317 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mohan N, Sorokina EM, Verdeny IV, Alvarez AS, Lakadamyali M. Detyrosinated microtubules spatially constrain lysosomes facilitating lysosome-autophagosome fusion. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(2):632–43. Epub 2018/12/21. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201807124 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6363446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Korolchuk VI, Rubinsztein DC. Regulation of autophagy by lysosomal positioning. Autophagy. 2011;7(8):927–8. Epub 2011/04/28. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.8.15862 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3149695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dynein-dependent movement of autophagosomes mediates efficient encounters with lysosomes. Cell Struct Funct. 2008;33(1):109–22. Epub 2008/04/05. doi: 10.1247/csf.08005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Hultgren SJ. Establishment of a persistent Escherichia coli reservoir during the acute phase of a bladder infection. Infection and immunity. 2001;69(7):4572–9. Epub 2001/06/13. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4572-4579.2001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC98534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chan CY, St John AL, Abraham SN. Mast cell interleukin-10 drives localized tolerance in chronic bladder infection. Immunity. 2013;38(2):349–59. Epub 2013/02/19. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.019 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3647685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tsang AW, Oestergaard K, Myers JT, Swanson JA. Altered membrane trafficking in activated bone marrow-derived macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2000;68(4):487–94. Epub 2000/10/19. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yates RM, Hermetter A, Russell DG. The kinetics of phagosome maturation as a function of phagosome/lysosome fusion and acquisition of hydrolytic activity. Traffic. 2005;6(5):413–20. Epub 2005/04/09. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00284.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xu T, Forgac M. Microtubules are involved in glucose-dependent dissociation of the yeast vacuolar [H+]-ATPase in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(27):24855–61. Epub 2001/05/02. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100637200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Harrison RE, Bucci C, Vieira OV, Schroer TA, Grinstein S. Phagosomes fuse with late endosomes and/or lysosomes by extension of membrane protrusions along microtubules: role of Rab7 and RILP. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(18):6494–506. Epub 2003/08/29. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.18.6494-6506.2003 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC193691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sun-Wada GH, Tabata H, Kawamura N, Aoyama M, Wada Y. Direct recruitment of H+-ATPase from lysosomes for phagosomal acidification. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 14):2504–13. Epub 2009/06/25. doi: 10.1242/jcs.050443 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kloover JS, den Bakker MA, Gelderblom H, van Meerbeeck JP. Fatal outcome of a hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel: a critical review of premedication regimens. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(2):304–5. Epub 2004/02/21. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601303 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2409560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chen S, Yang D, Wen Y, Jiang Z, Zhang L, Jiang J, et al. Dysregulated hemolysin liberates bacterial outer membrane vesicles for cytosolic lipopolysaccharide sensing. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(8):e1007240. Epub 2018/08/24. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007240 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6124777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nicaud JM, Mackman N, Gray L, Holland IB. Regulation of haemolysin synthesis in E. coli determined by HLY genes of human origin. Mol Gen Genet. 1985;199(1):111–6. Epub 1985/01/01. doi: 10.1007/BF00327519 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Deakin NO, Turner CE. Paxillin comes of age. J Cell Sci. 2008;121(Pt 15):2435–44. Epub 2008/07/25. doi: 10.1242/jcs.018044 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2522309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Brown MC, Perrotta JA, Turner CE. Identification of LIM3 as the principal determinant of paxillin focal adhesion localization and characterization of a novel motif on paxillin directing vinculin and focal adhesion kinase binding. J Cell Biol. 1996;135(4):1109–23. Epub 1996/11/01. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.4.1109 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2133378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wankel B, Ouyang J, Guo X, Hadjiolova K, Miller J, Liao Y, et al. Sequential and compartmentalized action of Rabs, SNAREs, and MAL in the apical delivery of fusiform vesicles in urothelial umbrella cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27(10):1621–34. Epub 2016/03/25. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-04-0230 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4865319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bumba L, Masin J, Macek P, Wald T, Motlova L, Bibova I, et al. Calcium-Driven Folding of RTX Domain beta-Rolls Ratchets Translocation of RTX Proteins through Type I Secretion Ducts. Mol Cell. 2016;62(1):47–62. Epub 2016/04/09. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gerasimenko JV, Tepikin AV, Petersen OH, Gerasimenko OV. Calcium uptake via endocytosis with rapid release from acidifying endosomes. Curr Biol. 1998;8(24):1335–8. Epub 1998/12/09. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00565-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bonifacino JS, Glick BS. The mechanisms of vesicle budding and fusion. Cell. 2004;116(2):153–66. Epub 2004/01/28. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01079-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.van Meer G, Voelker DR, Feigenson GW. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(2):112–24. Epub 2008/01/25. doi: 10.1038/nrm2330 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2642958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang C, Bauckman KA, Ross ASB, Symington JW, Ligon MM, Scholtes G, et al. A non-canonical autophagy-dependent role of the ATG16L1(T300A) variant in urothelial vesicular trafficking and uropathogenic Escherichia coli persistence. Autophagy. 2019;15(3):527–42. Epub 2018/10/20. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1535290 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6351132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Thumbikat P, Berry RE, Zhou G, Billips BK, Yaggie RE, Zaichuk T, et al. Bacteria-induced uroplakin signaling mediates bladder response to infection. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(5):e1000415. Epub 2009/05/05. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000415 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2669708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Horsley H, Dharmasena D, Malone-Lee J, Rohn JL. A urine-dependent human urothelial organoid offers a potential alternative to rodent models of infection. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1238. Epub 2018/01/21. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19690-7 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5775255 researchers at University College London interested in finding novel drug delivery systems for UTI. H.H., D.D. and J.M.L. declare no competing financial interests. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fratti RA, Backer JM, Gruenberg J, Corvera S, Deretic V. Role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Rab5 effectors in phagosomal biogenesis and mycobacterial phagosome maturation arrest. J Cell Biol. 2001;154(3):631–44. Epub 2001/08/08. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200106049 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2196432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.D’Costa VM, Braun V, Landekic M, Shi R, Proteau A, McDonald L, et al. Salmonella Disrupts Host Endocytic Trafficking by SopD2-Mediated Inhibition of Rab7. Cell Rep. 2015;12(9):1508–18. Epub 2015/08/25. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.063 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Spano S, Gao X, Hannemann S, Lara-Tejero M, Galan JE. A Bacterial Pathogen Targets a Host Rab-Family GTPase Defense Pathway with a GAP. Cell host & microbe. 2016;19(2):216–26. Epub 2016/02/13. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.01.004 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4854434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Thankavel K, Madison B, Ikeda T, Malaviya R, Shah AH, Arumugam PM, et al. Localization of a domain in the FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae capable of receptor recognition and use of a domain-specific antibody to confer protection against experimental urinary tract infection. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(5):1123–36. Epub 1997/09/01. doi: 10.1172/JCI119623 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC508287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mehershahi KS, Abraham SN, Chen SL. Complete Genome Sequence of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Strain CI5. Genome Announc. 2015;3(3). Epub 2015/05/30. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00558-15 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4447917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Abraham SN, Babu JP, Giampapa CS, Hasty DL, Simpson WA, Beachey EH. Protection against Escherichia coli-induced urinary tract infections with hybridoma antibodies directed against type 1 fimbriae or complementary D-mannose receptors. Infection and immunity. 1985;48(3):625–8. Epub 1985/06/01. doi: 10.1128/iai.48.3.625-628.1985 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC261209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Decker T, Lohmann-Matthes ML. A quick and simple method for the quantitation of lactate dehydrogenase release in measurements of cellular cytotoxicity and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) activity. J Immunol Methods. 1988;115(1):61–9. Epub 1988/11/25. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(88)90310-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Brian K Coombes, Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose

25 Jul 2022

Dear Professor Choi,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "α-Hemolysin Promotes Uropathogenic E. coli Persistence in Bladder Epithelial Cells Via Abrogating Bacteria-Harboring Lysosome Acidification" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the manuscript as it currently stands. These issues must be addressed before we would be willing to consider a revised version of your study. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Brian Coombes

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: This manuscript from the Abraham lab describes life cycle of UPEC inside bladder epithelial cell in the context of UPEC persistence. More specifically, UPEC escape Rab27b+ vesicles to become cytoplasmic using hemolysin activity; cytoplasmic UPEC are repactured by LC3A/B+ autophagosomes; and HlyA activity prevents acidification of autophagosomes into lysosomes. The authors show that hlyAKO mutant fails to leave Rab27b+ vesicles and is expelled from the cell. These results suggest the role for hemolysin activity in persistence of UPEC inside BECs.

Reviewer #2: In this work the authors probe the intracellular dynamics of UPEC within 5637 bladder epithelial cells and the role of the UPEC HylA toxin in preventing autolysosome acidification. The authors further postulate that HylA functions to reduce V-ATPase recruitment to the autolysosome by destabilizing microtubules. The authors go on to test the effects of intravesical instillation of a microtubule stabilizer to reduce bladder bacterial burden. While this work is interesting, I do have some concerns.

1. The introduction and discussion need extensive revision for clarity, grammar, and inclusiveness of the existing literature. There are several existing papers about UPEC hemolysin A that, for example, have not been referenced or adequately discussed. These include two papers https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.150037411 and

https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00075-08 that report that loss of HylA does not affect bladder colonization in a mouse model. The first reference specifically shows that loss of HylA did not affect intracellular populations of UPEC or IBC formation in a mouse UTI model. Also, although doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.12.003 is referenced by single sentence in the discussion, since this work was the first to report microtubule disruption by UPEC HylA (via paxillin degradation) a more thorough discussion is warranted. The authors are encouraged to more thoroughly contextualize their findings within the existing literature.

2. I would encourage the authors to report absolute numbers of bacteria instead of just as percentages. These data can be included in the supplement. With only the percentage of UPEC in each compartment reported, for example it is impossible to know if the absolute numbers of bacteria in different compartments actually changes as the infection progresses (for example, the same number of bacteria could be in Rab27 vesicles at later time points but appear less as percentage if there are more total intracellular UPEC at later time points). In general, all data should be reported as absolute numbers so changes in populations can be more accurately assessed by the reader.

Reviewer #3: This manuscript builds on prior work investigating UPEC persistence within bladders. Persistent/chronic UTI has been investigated by several groups, including a possible role for HlyA hemolysin. However, this is the first to state a role for the HlyA hemolysin in lysosome acidification. The premise is interesting, but some substantial concerns need to be addressed.

A major strength is the variety of assays that were conducted, including tracking of magnetically labeled bacteria in cultured cells and treatments with reagents to reduce bacterial burden in both cultured cells and a mouse bladder model, although this is tempered by the uneven application of these assays across different experimental conditions.

There are major concerns about the lack of description for several methods, lack of some important controls, and overstated conclusions.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: Page 4 last paragraph: As many as 37.6% of UPEC isolated from first-time UTI patients are reported to express the hlyA gene [20] but the expression rate significantly increased to 48.2% in patients experiencing recurring UTIs, implying a role of HlyA in the recurrence of UTIs [20].— Provide sample size for the cohorts with first-time UTI and recurrent UTI. Discuss why UPEC isolated from only 31% of subjects with second UTI were hlyA+.

Please add scale bars to all microscopic images.

Circles, squares, and rectangles are used to indicate different treatments throughout the manuscript. This is confusing and must be made consistent.

Figure legends must be rewritten to include relevant information

Fig 1A and C. The legend states that the data are from two-three biological replicates. How many mice were examined in each of the biological replicates? The CFU data (Fig 1A) should be presented with median as central tendency and analyzed for statistical significance using Mann Whitney U test. Also, SEM is not the correct measure of uncertainty.

Fig 1B. >50% UPEC (red) appear to be NOT associated with LAMP1+ vesicles (blue) at 9 day pi. It will be informative if the authors quantify these data are present them.

The authors mention on page 5, “However, it is noteworthy that by day 9, no neutrophils were detected in the urine of the infected mice.” How did the authors reach this conclusion?

Fig 1C. Define the positive control for MPO assay. Also, present raw MPO data either as ΔOD/min/g of tissue OR by extrapolating it to a known MPO standard. The current presentation shows % relative MPO activity with 700% MPO activity at 6 hpi. This does not make sense. How many biological replicates do these data represent? Why is the sample size at 6 hpi so low?

Figure 2 legend states that the data are from two-three biological replicates. How many technical replicates in each biological replicate? Also, SEM is not the correct measure of uncertainty. Replace it with SD. Please do this for all relevant results presented in Fig 2 (panels B, C, G, H) and other figures.

Provide details for confocal microscopy quantification data in Fig 2B, C, how many total infected cells did you count to reach the % of UPEC associated with Rab27b+ vesicles? Is it correct to say that in the presented image (Fig 2A) only one out of three cells is infected?

Fig 2H shows that siRNA treatment results in 200% of infected cells to contain UPEC. What does this mean? Also, are these UPEC associated with a specific vesicle?

The authors should explicitly state that Fig 2 shows in vitro experiments using 5637 cell line.

There is a drop in UPEC associated with Rab27b+ vesicles from 70% at 5h to 30% at 12h as shown in 2B. However, this is not supported by the data shown in Fig 2E. Please discuss this. Also, why only one early timepoint for Fig 2D and why not have similar time points for 2D and 2E?

In Fig 2G, how can you calculate %UPEC/total infected BEC for TritonX100 treated wells? Won’t Triton treatment break open ALL cells, and total infected BEC will be 0? This is a minor concern that will be resolved by clearly explaining how the calculations are done in this and other figures such as Fig 3H.

Include complemented hlyA KO CFT073 containing plasmid-borne hlyD to confirm that hlyD KO does not have polar effects. The complemented strain should be included in BEC and in vivo experiments.

Label x-axis in Fig 3C. Please define it in the figure legend as well. Not clear how you reached MOI of 50 from Fig 3C.

Show limit of detection with a dotted line in Fig 6.

Did you detect any CFUs in kidneys?

Fig 6C, right panel. What is the meaning of y-axis label here?

Reviewer #2: 1. While the use of magnetic bead labeled UPEC is a new an interesting approach, there are experiments lacking which are necessary to validate this system. I don’t see data in this manuscript demonstrating that labeling UPEC with magnetic beads does not alter how UPEC attaches to and invades BECs. Are recovered CFUs similar to what is observed with unlabeled UPEC? Do the magnetic bead UPEC express type 1 fimbriae and other virulence factors (like HylA) similarly to unlabeled UPEC? Also, for all of the magnetic pull down experiments, a “vehicle” control where magnetic beads are added to BECs (without UPEC) needs to be performed. This is important as a non-specific binding control to determine if the beads are taken up into vesicles by themselves (independent of UPEC) and if they alone can pulldown RAB27b fusiform vesicles for example. Also, when performing these types of experiments, it is usually good practice to perform blots for markers of other cellular compartments you do not expect the bacteria to be housed in to ensure specificity.

2. Maybe I am missing something, but I don’t understand why it is assumed there is a cytosolic intermediate for UPEC in BECs. The authors interpret the data in figure 2 to mean that UPEC escapes from RAB27b vesicles into the cytosol where it is recaptured into LC3A/B compartments. Couldn’t an alternate hypothesis be that the UPEC-containing RAB27b vesicles are trafficked and develop into LC3A/B compartments as part of the endocytic pathway? Even with evidence for a cytosolic stage (which I believe is in Figure 2G but it’s hard to tell because this figure is not called out where this is discussed in the results), how could one be certain that the bacteria individually transition from RAB27b to cytosol to LC3A/B compartments without a time-lapse experiment that tracks individual bacteria over time?

3. For lanes to be qualitatively compared in a Western blot they must be on the same blot (upper and lower panels of 3E cannot be compared with each other for example as the exposure time or amount loaded seems to be different). These blots need to be redone in this configuration if comparisons are to be made. Also, the authors overstate the observed differences in band intensities in figures 3E and 4G.

4. I am concerned about the observed CFU in the mouse bladder infection experiments in Figures 1 and 6. These are too low for and do not reflect is normally observed with UPEC infection of C57BL6 mice, especially for CFT073 (Figure 6). Given these abnormally low bladder bacteria titers, it is difficult to interpret the results of the mouse experiments. Perhaps the bladders are not being properly inoculated or there is a difference in the how the bacteria are being prepared for inoculation?

5. A critical control is missing for Figure 1D. Without the inclusion of a non-specific control (secondary antibody only), it is impossible to determine if the observed fluorescence is bacteria or autofluorescence which is common in bladder tissue. By just looking at the size, it seems as if these structures are quite a bit larger than the bacteria observed in the BECs in Figure 2A for example. Also, unless this was the only case and only field in which signal was detected the authors should provide additional representative images from other fields and other patient biopsies in the supplement to further support these findings.

Reviewer #3: Different methods were applied to very narrow time points, and the findings would be more convincing if all salient markers (Rab27b, LC3A/B) were measured at each timepoint to show how they are changing together—you could use a ratio of each marker normalized to a control. How many times were these pulldowns/blots conducted? Densitometry from several blots can be shown alongside a single blot. If bacteria are supposed to be in the cytosol vs vesicles at specific timepoints, show gentamicin sensitivity changing over time instead of providing a single snapshot. Data should be provided for 1) total CFU, 2) intracellular CFU, and 3) cytosolic vs vesicle-associated CFU so it is clear whether bacteria are invading and surviving normally.

Additional (or better) controls would also strengthen the conclusions. For example, uninfected or mock-infected cells are an important control that needs to be added for most of the experiments (see especially Fig 4). Throughout the manuscript, GAPDH is used as a control for western blots (as stated in the Fig 2 legend, although this antibody was not mentioned in the list of antibodies in the methods), but this antibody typically reacts with both mammalian and bacterial GAPDH. (note, the control should be stated clearly for the blot in Fig 3E.) Thus, it is not clear what is being assayed when, for example, magnetically labeled bacteria are used to pull down host cell components. Separate controls should be used to show both host cell protein levels and bacterial enrichment. The anti-E. coli antibody that seems to have been used for immunofluorescence microscopy might be a suitable alternative.

There needs to be more work to place this study into the body of knowledge for UPEC-bladder urothelium interactions. For example, quiescent intracellular reservoirs (QIRs) have been described in chronic/recurrent UTI mouse models. Similarly, the cell line used here is derived from a carcinoma and is known to have altered autophagic response. These cells also lack the fusiform vesicle physiology of umbrella cells, and they do not assemble urothelial plaques. It is not clear if the mechanism translates to intact, polarized, uroplakin crystal-coated bladder cells. Likewise, use of pan-inhibitors will be tremendously disruptive of normal cellular physiology, including the pathways and markers in this current study. Thus, claims that specific pathways are being targeted by bacteria are overstated. This does not negate the experiments conducted, but it needs to be acknowledged.

HlyA is not produced by the majority of UPECs (e.g., 31-48% PMID: 26299820, 20% PMID: 28330863) and, if anything, seems to be more correlated with pyelonephritis. Indeed, the prevalence of hlyA and its role in recurrence is overstated in the introduction: ref 19 is a lung study; ref 20 is PCR positivity, not expression, and does not demonstrate a significant increase in hlyA in patients with recurrent UTI. Thus, this proposed mechanism, if true, is restricted to a narrow subset of UPECs. It would be useful to show mouse bladder persistence for a panel of wild-type UPEC isolates as well as the 8-week persistence data that is mentioned in the first paragraph of the results but not shown. Do hlyA-negative UPEC isolates display similar persistence in the mouse model used here? This should be factored into the vaccine discussion as well; how likely is a secreted hemolysin that seems to exert its most potent action intracellularly to be an effective vaccine antigen? Finally, it is not clear how a pore-forming toxin is interfering with recruitment of V-ATPase to lysosomes. It would be helpful to propose a model that could be tested.

Please add size bars to all micrographs. In addition, bacteria are nearby the host cell vesicular membrane markers, but not colocalizing (this would mean the markers are superimposed, not adjacent). The figure legends state that confocal microscopy was used; z-stacks should therefore be collected to show that bacteria are inside vesicles. How many fields were examined for each set of experiments?

Please add discussion about possible toxic effects of microtubule stabilization on the bladder, particularly since this is being proposed as safer than antibiotic treatment. In addition, the current work must be better placed into the context of HlyA and bladder persistence work done by others in the UTI field (PMID 25675528). It would be helpful to discuss how Rab27b+ positivity, which is used for apical targeting of fusiform vesicles (e.g., PMID 27009205), is tied to bacterial internalization.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1. On page 6, please replace capacity with ability in the following sentence: “Thus, the capacity of UPEC CI5 to persist within human BECs in vitro appeared to mimic their capacity to persist within the superficial bladder epithelium in mice.”

2. Please rewrite the following sentence, it is very difficult to understand.

Page 6- “These findings suggest that evading vesicles that encase UPEC can benefit the bacteria, as they assist in avoiding elimination by BECs.”

3. Page 7: “Bacterial growth was minimal in siRNA-transfected BECs, but was significantly higher in BECs where autophagosomes were deficient and many more cytosolic bacteria were present (Fig 2H).” This sentence is difficult to understand. Minimal in reference to what? Which siRNA transfected BECs show minimal bacterial growth? Also “many more” is vague, please replace it with by “X-fold higher or lower”.

4. “then at a time when we expect UPEC to be cytosolic, solubilize BECs to release intracellular BECs and then isolate them using a magnet.” Correct this sentence.

5. Rephrase the following sentence. It is difficult to understand: “To prove that these isolated UPEC are not encased in any vesicle and are truly cytosolic, we exposed them to gentamicin, and expected them to be susceptible to gentamicin because they are not membrane-bound.”

6. Page 8: “we labeled the WT CFT073 and ΔhlyD mutant strains with magnetic beads and exposed them to BECs at an MOI of 20, for 2 h.” Exposing bacteria to BECs sounds counterintuitive. Rephrase this.

Reviewer #2: 1. Scale bars are missing from all micrographs.

2. Please provide a reference for the selective disruption of autophagosome membranes by Triton X-100

3. Line numbers should be added

4. Please explain more clearly what ATG5 is and why exactly knocking it down would reduce the number of autophagosomes – saying it is an essential component is not sufficient.

5. For the experiment in Figure 4H I think it would be more appropriate to pharmacologically inhibit the V-ATPase after infection has been initiated then to perform siRNA knockdown before the infection is started.

Reviewer #3: Fig 1B/C: bacteria that persist in the bladder could also be resistant to neutrophils, perhaps due to biofilm formation, fast growth, or toxins that directly affect neutrophils. Indeed, HlyA has been previously hypothesized to suppress inflammatory responses (PMID 22264513, which was cited in the discussion but not addressed in this context).

Fig 1E: LC3A/B should appear as a doublet, but only one band is shown in the very closely cropped image (the lower band might be barely visible). The ratio between these is useful to distinguish autophagocytic response. It would be helpful to show the full blot as a supplemental figure. Also, Fig 1E describes experiments out to 5 days p.i.; is it surprising that bacterial numbers in this cell culture model remained steady after 24h? Were intracellular bacterial communities ever observed?

The y-axis for several figures (e.g., Fig2B and C, Fig 3F and H) is confusing. It seems that the denominator is “total UPEC” but the axes show “/Total infected BECs.” If it is indeed total UPEC, how is that being quantified? Please clarify.

Figs 3A, B, C: please describe how hemolysis and cytotoxicity were assayed. Both techniques are absent from the methods section.

Fig 4D: Please comment on the apparent increase in LAMP1 at 48h.

Fig 4G: what is this time point? This is especially important since Fig 3 suggests there are different levels of wt vs mutant bacteria by 4 hpi.

Fig 6: methods need to be provided detailing the dosages and timing of paclitaxel administration.

Methods:

Please provide a reference for UPEC strain CI5 or provide further description of its origin.

As far as I am aware, Dr. Mobley is still at the University of Michigan, not Washington.

Was bacterial viability measured after magnetic labeling? What percentage of bacteria were labeled by the beads?

Please note inconsistent spelling of “gentamicin” throughout.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Nina R Salama, Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose

4 Mar 2023

Dear Professor Choi,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "α-Hemolysin Promotes Uropathogenic E. coli Persistence in Bladder Epithelial Cells Via Abrogating Bacteria-Harboring Lysosome Acidification" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Authors should modify the text to improve clarity, and to account for potential limitations and alternative explanations for their results noted by Reviewers.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Brian Coombes

%CORR_ED_EDITOR_ROLE%

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Authors should modify the text to improve clarity, and account for potential limitations and alternative explanations for their results noted by Reviewers.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: This is a revised version of the manuscript detailing the molecular stages during the bladder epithelial infection by UPEC. The authors have carefully answered every concern raised by me and by other reviewers. However, I still have concerns

Reviewer #2: The authors have fully addressed my concerns.

Reviewer #4: This manuscript “�-Hemolysin promotes uropathogenic E. coli persistence in bladder epithelial cells via abrogating bacteria-harboring lysosome acidification” by Naskar et al, describes the intracellular lifecycle of UPEC. Specifically, they use cellular and molecular biology techniques to probe the vesicular compartments of the host cell to assess the location of UPEC. This study uses a variety of complimentary techniques to answer very specific questions about the stages of intracellular movement. They conclude that although initially encased in RAB27b+ vesicles, UPEC briefly escapes into the cytosol before recapture in the autophagosome. Here, UPEC can prevent acidification and maturation of the autolysosome by inhibiting host V-ATPase via microtubulin instability. From the bacterial perspective, they use UPEC strain CFT073 and an isogenic hemolysin mutant to state that the hemolysin toxin is critical for RAB27b+ vesicle escape and prevention autolysosome acidification. The ultimate conclusion is that hemolysin facilitates long-term persistence in the host bladder.

While several sections of this manuscript have been revised and/or improved by additional experiments, there still remain critical points highlighted during the initial review that were not adequately addressed.

In addition, the techniques are very robust and novel; however, there are still concerns that the conclusions drawn by the authors are not fully supported by the data presented, and several key experiments are lacking appropriate cellular controls. There must be more textual clarity and mention of the experimental limitations present in this study.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: The authors mention that Figures 1A and 1C represent three and two experiments, respectively and each dot represents a single mouse. Did authors include 5 mice each in three and two replicates for Fig 1A and C? This should be clearly stated in Figure legend.

The authors also say "we have modified the bar graph in Figure 1A with the median as the central tendency and SD."--This change is not reflected in the figure legend. This needs to be corrected. Also, standard deviation should be removed and median should be shown as a line and not as a bar.

I agree with the authors that "The Mann-Whitney U test is used to compare differences between two independent groups when the dependent variable is either ordinal or continuous, but not normally distributed." Since the mouse CFU data are not normal, they should use Kruskal-Wallis test.

Reviewer #2: NA

Reviewer #4: Major Comments:

1. Results section “Trafficking of intracellular UPEC from RAB27b vesicles into LC3A/B+ compartments is proceeded by a brief cytosolic phase”

It is unclear if autophagic and RAB27b+ vesicles co-localize. There is no microscopy image that shows both markers simultaneously and Figure 2D does not preclude that both markers are present on the same vesicle. Since autophagy is a known protein recycling pathway, it is plausible that LC3A/B+ compartments encompass damaged (via hemolysin) RAB27b+ vesicles; therefore, there would be no true cytosolic stage for the bacteria. Because of this, the subsequent knock down of ATG5 only proves that RAB27b+ vesicles have been degraded, but not that a cytosolic stage exists when autophagy is functional. A differential centrifugation prep would be more conclusive to test for viable bacteria in the cytosolic fraction. This was a missed opportunity that could have been used in conjunction with targeted enrichment for vesicle-associated UPEC.

The field uses 5637 cells; however, it must be mentioned somewhere (in addition to the statements in lines 408-411) the considerations of these cells being of cancerous origin. It is known that many cellular pathways (including autophagy) function differently in cancer cells.

2. Results section “HlyA facilitates the escape of UPEC from RAB27b+ vesicles”

To support this claim, authors must include the genetic complementation of CFT in these specific, keystone experiments. Ideally, there would be similar studies in a HlyA- UPEC strain as a control to demonstrate that these phenomena are truly hemolysin-mediated.

The cell monolayer would be partially permeable or “leaky” (even though sublytic) with many of these assays due to hemolysin insertion into the plasma membrane. At what point does it become gentamicin sensitive in this process? Similarly, the RAB27b+ vesicle would also go through various stages of degradation via hemolysin.

Why the switch from MOI 50 to 20?

The data in Figure 3G are highly variable and are not truly indicative of expulsion (rather than IBC formation followed by cell death) without more data. The clusters of bacteria are visible in most of the microscopy images. QIRs have been described as single bacteria in a vesicle. IBC are large clusters that grow in the cytoplasm until the cell bursts. How do these fit into the paradigm? Although there is brief mention, more explanation is needed.

3. Results section “Inhibition of V-ATPase recruitment by HlyA” and “Destabilization of the cytoskeletal structure in bacteria-infected BECs reduces intracellular bacterial killing”

The narrative mentions expression of hemolysin while the UPEC are intracellular; however, the experimental design does not test this directly. This is critical due to the verbiage in this section and in the discussion. The vesicle isolation preps could have been blotted for HlyA and/or a luminescent reporter containing the hlyA promoter could have been used.

We can’t be sure that the hlyD mutant doesn’t have altered regulation of other virulence factors preventing acidification. These experiments must be performed with the complemented mutant to support these statements.

The wording makes it seem as if HlyA has a direct interaction with V-ATPase at this particular stage of the intracellular lifecycle. Could it not be the hemolysin inserted into the plasma membrane that is destabilizing the cytoskeleton and thus V-ATPase recruitment? The findings in Fig. 5A demonstrate that the cell architecture has been compromised. It could be from the effects of hemolysin secreted extracellularly leading to microtubule dysregulation inside the cell.

With many of these experiments, plasma membrane was selectively disrupted when it could have been isolated and/or stained as a negative internal control. Couldn’t the gentamicin-sensitive UPEC be associated with the membrane? A co-IP for plasma membrane associated protein (clathrin/calveolin/dynamin) could address this.

4. Based on the fact that only 30-50% (as stated in the introduction) of UPEC are hlyA+, some of the statements about future therapeutics are not fully supported by these data.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: In general, there are a lot of changes in figures although they are not always reflected in the figure legend. Atleast they are highlighted in yellow.

Include limit of detection in ALL figures showing CFU/ml data-Fig 1A, 1C, Fig 6C, etc. Explain in methods how the LOD was determined.

Reviewer #2: The authors have fully addressed my concerns

Reviewer #4: Minor Comments:

• I assume CI5 is hlyA+, but it is not explicitly stated

• Add Fig S1 to panel Fig 1A

• Line 103-104: replace with “neutrophil recruitment had subsided”

• rUTI patient samples during an episode of UTI or during “dormancy”?

• What is the genotype (hlyA+ or -) of rUTI strains shown here?

• Were gentamicin concentrations tested on CI5 to determine sensitivity?

• Why include J96 (fig. 3A) if there is no mention in the text?

• Line 114: What is this number as a percent of total UPEC infected? (only 0.01% of UPEC enters the cell at MOI 100)

• Triton-X should have been an included positive control in cytotoxicity assays

• Clusters of UPEC in autolysosomes (as seen in microscopy images) would skew these CFU data

• Figure 6B can’t be 0 CFU unless the entire organ homogenate was plated, which is not the case according to the methods

• Gentamicin misspelled in figures

• Does Fig. S20 indicate that there is only n=1 for WB experiments?

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #4: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

 

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Decision Letter 2

Nina R Salama, Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose

25 Apr 2023

Dear Professor Choi,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'α-Hemolysin Promotes Uropathogenic E. coli Persistence in Bladder Epithelial Cells Via Abrogating Bacteria-Harboring Lysosome Acidification' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Brian Coombes

%CORR_ED_EDITOR_ROLE%

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Nina R Salama, Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose

9 May 2023

Dear Professor Choi,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "α-Hemolysin Promotes Uropathogenic E. coli Persistence in Bladder Epithelial Cells Via Abrogating Bacteria-Harboring Lysosome Acidification," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Bacterial burden in the infected mouse bladders at 8 weeks of post infection.

    C57BL/6 female mice were infected by intravesical instillation of the UPEC CI5 strain and bacterial CFUs in the infected bladders were measured at 8 weeks post-infection.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. A gating strategy to define the neutrophil population in Fig 1C.

    Ly6G+ CD11b+ CD45+ cells in the mouse bladders were counted by flow cytometry.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Presence of persistent UPEC in human bladder tissue.

    Bladder biopsies were obtained from recurrent UTI patients or patients with no history of UTI in past two year. These tissues were immunostained for UPEC (E. coli, green), urothelium (E-cadherin, blue), lysosomal vesicle (LAMP1, red), and nucleus (DAPI, gray). Yellow arrowheads indicate UPEC. “L”: lumen of the bladder. Scale bars: 10 μm.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. UPEC localization in LC3 autophagosome without the presence of RAB27b.

    (A) Human 5637 BECs were infected with UPEC CI5 strain for 8 h and were stained with anti-LC3A/B (red) and anti-UPEC (green) antibodies. (B, C) Human 5637 BECs were transfected with pEGFP-LC3 (green) to specifically trace LC3 autophagy component. Next day, the cells were infected with UPEC CI5 strain. After 4 or 8 h p.i., cells were stained with anti-E. coli (red) and anti-RAB27b (blue) antibodies. Representative images are from randomly selected regions. Scale bars: 10 μm.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. No significant difference in the intracellular bacterial numbers of labeled and nonlabelled bacteria.

    Human 5637 BECs were treated with magnetic bead-labeled UPEC CI5 strain or UPEC CI5 strain (no labeled beads). After 2 h of incubation with gentamicin to remove extracellular UPEC, intracellular CFU were examined. ns: not significant.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Isolated magnetic bead-labeled UPEC still express FimH and are associated with Rab27+.

    Human 5637 BECs were incubated with magnetic beads alone or with magnetic bead-labeled UPEC. After two hours of incubation, isolated beads or cell lysates from each condition were analyzed for the expression of RAB27b, Endobrevin/VAMP8, and FimH. Gapdh was used for loading control of UPEC-containing vesicle.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Intracellular vesicle isolation using magnetically labeled bacteria.

    Human 5637 BECs were seeded and infected with magnetically labeled UPECs. After lysing cells by passing the cells through needles, UPEC-containing vesicles were isolated with magnet. Isolated vesicles containing UPECs were treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 or saline, then incubated with gentamicin before plating on McConkey agar plates.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. CFU count in absolute numbers for Fig 2E.

    Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Decreased expression of ATG5 upon the siRNA transfection.

    The 5637 BECs transfected with NS siRNA or ATG5 siRNA and immunoblotted using an anti-ATG5 antibody to examine the expression of ATG5. Anti-β-actin antibody was used for a loading control.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. CFU count in absolute numbers for Fig 2G.

    Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

    (TIF)

    S11 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 2H.

    Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

    (TIF)

    S12 Fig. Escape of ΔhlyD UPECs from RAB27b vesicles after complementation.

    ΔhlyD UPEC strain was transformed with phlyD plasmid to generate ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain. Human 5637 BECs were infected with magnetic beads labeled ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain or ΔhlyD with empty plasmid. After 5 h of infection, isolated UPEC-containing vesicles were analyzed for the expression of RAB27b. Gapdh was used for loading control of UPEC-containing vesicles.

    (TIF)

    S13 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 3F.

    Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

    (TIF)

    S14 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 3G.

    Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

    (TIF)

    S15 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 3H.

    Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. *P<0.05

    (TIF)

    S16 Fig. Deacidification of ΔhlyD UPECs after complementation of hlyD gene.

    ΔhlyD UPEC strain was transformed with phlyD plasmid to generate ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain. Human 5637 BECs were infected with ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain or ΔhlyD with empty plasmid. After 24 h of infection, BECs were dyed with LysoTracker (red) to trace the acidification of UPEC-containing vesicles. Anti-UPEC (green) and anti-LAMP1 (blue) antibodies were used to stain the fixed cells. Quantitative data from two independent experiments were analyzed. Data are shown as mean ±SD. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. ****P<0.0001. Scale bar: 10 μm.

    (TIF)

    S17 Fig. Decreased expression of V-ATPase upon the siRNA transfection.

    The 5637 BECs transfected with NS siRNA or V-ATPase siRNA (25, 50, or 100 pmol) and immunoblotted using an anti-V-ATPase antibody to examine the expression of V-ATPase. Anti-β-actin antibody was used for a loading control.

    (TIF)

    S18 Fig. Pharmacological inhibition of V-ATPase.

    Human 5637 BECs were infected with UPEC ΔhlyD strain, and extracellular UPEC was removed by gentamycin treatment. Then, infected BECs were incubated in media containing Bafilomycin A1, a known pharmacological inhibitor of V-ATPase (vacuolar H+-ATPase), at 100 nM concentration. After 24 h post-treatment, LysoTracker Red dye was applied and then stained with anti-LAMP1 (blue) or anti-UPEC (green) antibodies for confocal microscopy imaging. The number of UPEC co-localized with LysoTracker Red dye was quantified in randomly chosen fields. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. ****P<0.0001. Scale bar: 10 μm.

    (TIF)

    S19 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 5E.

    Data were analyzed by an ordinary one-way ANOVA (B, D, E, F). **P<0.01; n.s, not significant.

    (TIF)

    S20 Fig. CFU count as absolute numbers for Fig 5F.

    Data were analyzed by an ordinary one-way ANOVA. **P<0.01; n.s, not significant.

    (TIF)

    S21 Fig. Recovery of UPEC persistency after complementation on ΔhlyD UPEC strain.

    ΔhlyD UPEC strain was transformed with phlyD plasmid to generate ΔhlyD(phlyD) strain. (A) Human 5637 BECs were co-infected with equal numbers of the ΔhlyD and ΔhlyD(phlyD) strains, and intracellular UPEC numbers were examined at indicated time points. (B) After infection with these UPEC strains on human BECs, the cells were stained with anti-tubulin (red), anti-UPEC (green), and anti-LAMP1 (blue) antibodies for confocal microscopic imaging. (C) C57BL/6J was co-infected with equal numbers of the ΔhlyD and ΔhlyD(phlyD) strains and bacterial burden in mouse bladders were examined. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (A, C). *P<0.05; **P<0.01, Scale bar: 10 μm.

    (TIF)

    S22 Fig. The mouse bacterial burden in the bladder was presented as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).

    The detection limit of CFU in mouse bladders was 100 CFU per bladder.

    (TIF)

    S23 Fig. Densitometry of western blot data.

    Representative results from two to three independent western blots were selected and presented.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_re.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 2nd_Response to reviewer_Plos pathogens_Final_re.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES