Abstract
At a sedimentary site in an old mine site, Miscanthus sinensis formed patches, where Pinus densiflora seedlings could grow better compared with those outside the patches, indicating that M. sinensis would improve P. densiflora seedling establishment. The purpose of this study was to understand the mechanisms by which M. sinensis facilitates the survival of P. densiflora seedlings by considering the soil properties, heavy metal tolerance, and root endophytes in P. densiflora seedlings at the sedimentary site. The sedimentary site, which is a bare ground, contained high concentrations of Fe, indicating that plants should be exposed to Fe and high soil temperature stresses. Measurement of soil temperature revealed that M. sinensis suppressed sharp increases and alternation of soil temperature, resulting in reducing high soil temperature stress in P. densiflora seedlings. To adapt to the Fe stress environment, P. densiflora outside and inside the patches produced Fe detoxicants, including catechin, condensed tannin, and malic acid. Ceratobasidium bicorne and Aquapteridospora sp. were commonly isolated from P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches as root endophytes, which might enhance Fe tolerance in the seedlings. Aquapteridospora sp., which is considered as a dark-septate endophyte (DSE), was also isolated from the roots of M. sinensis, suggesting that M. sinensis might play a source of a root endophyte to P. densiflora seedlings. Ceratobasidium bicorne could be classified into root endophytes showing symbiosis and weak pathogenicity to host plants. Therefore, high soil temperature stress would weaken P. densiflora seedlings, causing root endophytic C. bicorne to appear pathogenic. We suggested that P. densiflora could adapt to the Fe stress environment via producing Fe detoxicants, and M. sinensis would facilitate the establishment of P. densiflora seedlings in the sedimentary site by providing a DSE, Aquapteridospora sp., and maintaining symbiosis of C. bicorne from high soil temperature stress.
Introduction
The heavy metal environments in the world originate from anthropogenic activities such as mining, whereas some occur naturally, such as serpentinite sites. There are numerous old mine sites in Japan, and acidic mine wastewater containing high concentrations of harmful metals is a significant problem [1]. To ameliorate this problem, heavy metals can be removed from wastewater as sludge and stored at sedimentary sites. Phytostabilization is a relatively inexpensive and widely adaptable method for preventing the diffusion of sediments containing high concentrations of heavy metals [2,3]. High concentrations of heavy metals including Al are fatal to plants without heavy metal tolerance because of metal toxicity, such as generation of reactive oxygen species and enzyme inactivation [4–9]. Therefore, heavy metals can disturb vegetation by creating a toxic effect and hampering plant growth [10,11]. In contrast, natural vegetation has been observed in heavy metal environments [12–14], indicating that plants naturally growing in heavy metal environments have adapted to heavy metal environments [15–17]. Elucidation of heavy metal tolerance in native plants in sedimentary sites would be useful for the revegetation of sedimentary sites using heavy metal-tolerant native plants.
At sedimentary sites, it is important to introduce pioneer plants with tolerance to toxic metals. Miscanthus sinensis, which can be observed in various old mine sites as a pioneer species [18], has Al tolerance mechanisms [19,20]. Harmful metal tolerance in plants can be explained by [17,21–24]: 1) inhibition of heavy metal invasion into cells by adsorption to cell walls, 2) reduction of heavy metal permeability through the cell membrane, 3) production of polypeptides including sulfur, 4) sequestration of heavy metals chelated by organic acids and phenolic compounds into vacuoles, 5) active removal of heavy metals from the cell, and 6) removal of reactive oxygen species generated by harmful metals. Root endophytes and symbiotic microbes growing in roots harmful metals tolerance of plants [25–29]. In our previous study [20], M. sinensis suppressed the transfer of Al to aboveground parts and produced chlorogenic acid to detoxify Al in roots. Additionally, root endophytes can enhance Al tolerance in M. sinensis. Therefore, it is important to clarify the tolerance of plants to harmful metals by considering their interactions with the root endophytes.
At the sedimentary site, it was observed that M. sinensis naturally grew and formed patches, and Pinus densiflora seedlings grew well inside these patches compared with those outside the patches. We hypothesized that M. sinensis possessing harmful metal tolerance could enhance the growth of P. densiflora seedlings at the sedimentary site. The purpose of this study was to clarify the mechanisms by which M. sinensis enhances P. densiflora establishment in sedimentary sites by considering harmful metals tolerance in M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedlings. We considered the effect of M. sinensis on three main factors: 1) soil properties, including harmful metal concentrations, water content, and soil temperature; 2) heavy metal tolerance in P. densiflora such as suppression of harmful metal uptake, enhancement of nutrient element uptake, and harmful metal detoxicants; and 3) infection rate and species of microbes (endophytes and ectomycorrhiza) growing in roots. Through these experiments, we discussed whether M. sinensis could contribute to the survival rate of P. densiflora and could enhance vegetation succession.
Materials and methods
Survival rate and mortality factor of P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches
Our study site was a sedimentary site located in an old mine in Akita Prefecture, Japan. We obtained permits and approvals for the work from a company which has the mine site. Any protected species were not sampled. At the site, lime and harmful metals present in the acid mine wastewater were precipitated, and the soil was classified as man-made soils according to the FAO-UNESCO system [30]. At the study site, M. sinensis formed patches (Fig 1), and current-year P. densiflora seedlings grew naturally outside and inside these patches. To observe the survival rate of P. densiflora seedlings, we established a plot (north–south: 35 m; east–west: 10 m) (Fig 1) at the site. A total of 51 patches of M. sinensis were observed in the plot. A total of 124 and 77 current-year P. densiflora seedlings were observed outside and inside 42 patches, respectively, as identified using numbering tapes in September 2019. Survival rates were observed in July and September 2020–2022. Dead seedlings were collected to identify the mortality factors (disease, physical damage, and lost) using a stereo microscope (VMF2x, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The main symptom was root rot. After observations, possible pathogenic fungi were isolated from the roots of P. densiflora seedlings, whose main mortality factor was disease. The roots were surface-sterilized with 70% ethanol followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite solution and again with 70% ethanol each for 1 min. They were then rinsed twice with sterile deionized water for 5 min to remove the reagents and were dried on sterile filter paper on a clean bench for 5 min. The surface-sterilized roots were cut into approximately 10-mm segments with a sterile scalpel, placed on 1% malt extract agar medium, and incubated at 23°C in the dark for 2 weeks.
Fungal detection percentages (%) were calculated by means of the following formula:
(1) |
where Nd is the number of dead seedlings from which possible pathogenic fungi appear, and Nt is the total number of dead seedlings used for isolation.
Harmful metal concentrations, pH (H2O) water content and temperature in soil outside and inside patches
In September 2019, soil samples (200 × 200 × 200 mm volume) outside and inside the patches were collected from randomly selected four patches. After air-drying at 20°C for 1 week, the soil was passed through a sieve (< 2 mm). Soil properties, such as pH (H2O), concentrations of harmful metals (Al, Fe, Cu, Mn, and Zn), and available Fe were measured. The pH (H2O) was determined using a pH meter (F-22, HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan). The harmful metals were quantified using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; Agilent 720, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), after digestion in concentrated HNO3–HClO4 (1:4 v/v) at 140°C. Available Fe was extracted according to a modified method [31] below: 8 g of air-dried soil was added to 20 mL of 1.2 mol/L sodium acetate solution (pH 4.8). Available Fe was extracted by shaking at 100 rpm for 1 h, and its concentration was measured via ICP-OES. For all measurements, the results of four replications were averaged, and standard errors (SEs) were calculated.
In July and September 2020–2022, water content in 20 soil samples outside and inside the patches was measured using a soil moisture meter (HH2; Daiki Rika Kogyo Co., Ltd, Konosu, Japan). From July to September 2022, soil temperature at 5 cm depth was measured every 1 h outside and inside the two patches using a soil thermometer (TR-52i, T & D Co., Matsumoto, Japan).
Elemental concentrations in M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedlings growing outside and inside the patches
Five individuals of M. sinensis growing at our study site were collected in July 2020. The collected samples were washed with deionized water to remove soil particles [32,33] and separated into aboveground parts, dead leaves, rhizomes, roots, and root skins. The separated tissues were dried at 80°C for 48 h, ground, and pyrolyzed in concentrated HNO3 at 130°C. The concentrations of harmful metals (Al, Fe, Cu, Mn, and Zn) and nutrient elements (Ca, K, Mg, and P) in the plant tissues were measured using ICP-OES. The concentrations of harmful metals in each tissue of the five M. sinensis samples were averaged, and SEs were calculated. The transfer factors of harmful metals (ratios of plant tissue concentrations to soil concentration) were calculated according to [34] as follows:
(2) |
The results of the five replications were averaged, and SEs were calculated.
In July and September 2020, eight current-year seedlings of P. densiflora were collected from outside and inside the patches, respectively. In July and September 2021, eight one-year seedlings of P. densiflora were collected from the outside and inside the patches, respectively. The collected samples were washed with deionized water to remove soil particles [32,33] and separated into aboveground parts, hypocotyls, and roots. The separated tissues were dried at 80°C for 48 h, ground, and pyrolyzed in concentrated HNO3 at 130°C. The concentrations of harmful metals and nutrient elements in the plant tissues were measured using ICP-OES. The results of the eight replications were averaged, and the SEs were calculated.
Analysis of phenolic compounds and organic acids in roots of M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedlings
Roots of M. sinensis used for elemental analysis mentioned above were also employed for phenolic compounds analysis. The roots of the five individuals of M. sinensis were washed with deionized water. The roots were cut into pieces with scissors in methanol for the extraction of phenolic compounds for 5 days at 23°C in the dark. The methanol extract was filtered, concentrated in vacuo at approximately 40°C, and dissolved in 1 mL of 50% methanol. The resultant solution (10 μL) was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Prominence UFLC series, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with analysis of spectral characteristics using a diode array detector (DAD; SPDM20A, Shimadzu) according to the method described previously [35]. For the quantification of phenolic compounds in root extracts, the spectral characteristics from 220 to 400 nm and the retention times of chlorogenic acid (MP Biomedicals LLC., Santa Ana, CA, USA) were compared with those of the peaks in the root extracts. To measure the molecular weight of phenolic compounds in the root extracts, a high performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometer (HPLC/ESI-MS; LC/MS-2020 series, Shimadzu) equipped with a UV-VIS detector (SPD-20A; Shimadzu) at 320 nm was used. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizer gas (N2 supplier 24F; System instruments, Tokyo, Japan), and MS was operated in the total ion count mode (scanning range, m/z 50–500). The HPLC conditions were as follows: column, Mightysil RP-18 MS (150 × 2.0 mm; Kanto, Tokyo, Japan); eluent, aq. 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and 100% acetonitrile (solvent B); flow rate, 0.2 mL/min at 40°C. The following gradient was used for the eluent system: 0–10 min, 70% A and 30% B; 10–20 min, 50% A and 50% B; and 20–40 min, 100% B. For the quantification of phenolic compounds, an absolute calibration curve of chlorogenic acid was prepared by HPLC-DAD at 320 nm. The results of five replications were averaged, and SEs were calculated.
Roots of P. densiflora seedlings used for elemental analysis described above were also employed for the analysis of productions in the roots of the seedlings. Among the eight seedlings, four seedling roots were used for the analysis of phenolic compounds, including condensed tannins, and the others were used for organic acids analysis. Phenolic compounds analysis was performed using the methods described above. For the quantification of phenolic compounds in root extracts, the spectral characteristics from 220 to 400 nm and the retention times of catechin (MP Biomedicals LLC., Santa Ana, CA, USA) were compared with those of the peaks in the root extracts. The molecular weights of the phenolic compounds in the root extracts were measured via HPLC/ESI-MS equipped with a UV-VIS detector at 280 nm. HPLC/ESI-MS analysis was conducted as previously described. For the quantification of phenolic compounds, an absolute calibration curve of catechin was prepared by HPLC-DAD at 280 nm. The results of four replications were averaged, and SEs were calculated.
Condensed tannins were quantified according to the method described in [36]. The butanol reagent was prepared as follows: 0.7 g FeSO4·7H2O and 50 mL of HCl (36%) were mixed and filled up to 1000 mL with butanol. The samples (300 μL) used for HPLC-DAD analysis were added to 3.5 mL of butanol reagent, and reacted at 90°C for 40 min. The absorbance of the reactants was measured at 550 nm using a UV-VIS detector (UV-2450, Shimadzu). Condensed tannin concentrations were calculated using a cyanidin chloride standard curve (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The concentration of the condensed tannins was expressed as cyanidin chloride equivalents. The results of four replications were averaged, and SEs were calculated.
For organic acid analysis, the roots of four P. densiflora seedlings were extracted in 80% ethanol for 5 days at 23°C in the dark. The extract was filtered, concentrated in vacuo at approximately 40°C and dissolved in 200 μL of 50% methanol. The resultant solution was applied to an anion exchange column (TOYOPAK DEAE M, Tosoh Corporation, Shunan, Japan), and the organic acids were eluted with 6 mol/L formic acid. The eluate was freeze-dried (VD-250F; Taitec, Saitama, Japan) to remove formic acid, and the residue was dissolved in 100 μL of pyridine. Then, 100 μL of N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA; Thermo Scientific, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was added, and the sample was trimethylsilylated at 37°C for 30 min. The organic acid concentration was measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) on a QP2010 instrument equipped with a GC-2010 electron-ionization mass spectrometry detector (Shimadzu) and a low-polar InertCap 5MS/Sil capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25-μm film thickness; GL Sciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) following the methods described in [37]. The mass spectral characteristics at m/z 50–500 and retention times of malic acid (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.)-trimethylsilyl were compared with those of the peaks in the root extracts. For the quantification of organic acids, the absolute calibration curve of malic acid-trimethylsilyl was measured using the selected ion mode (m/z 73, 147, and 233). The results of four replications were averaged, and SEs were calculated.
Infection rate and isolation of root endophytes from M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedlings
In September, five M. sinensis individuals and four current-year seedlings of P. densiflora outside and inside the patches were collected. A part of the root was used to calculate infection rates, and the other part of the root was used for the isolation of root endophytes. The collected roots were washed with deionized water and stained with trypan blue as previously described [38]. The trypan-blue-stained roots were observed by microscopy (CX21, Olympus) to calculate the infection rate of microbes as follows: arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM mycorrhiza; Paris-type; [39]), root endophytes (microsclerotia; [40]), and ectomycorrhiza (hartig net; [41]). Infection rates were calculated according to [42,43]. The results were averaged, and SEs were calculated (M. sinensis, n = 5; P. densiflora, n = 4).
For the isolation of root endophytes, roots of M. sinensis were surface-sterilized with 70% ethanol for 1 min, 7.5% hydrogen peroxide solution for 5 min, and again with 70% ethanol for 1 min. For P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches, the roots were surface-sterilized with 70% ethanol for 1 min, 15% hydrogen peroxide solution for 5 min, and again with 70% ethanol for 1 min. The roots were rinsed twice with sterile deionized water for 5 min to remove the reagents and were dried on sterile filter paper on a clean bench for 5 min. Sterilized roots were cut into approximately 10-mm segments with a sterile scalpel, and 100 segments were randomly cut from each plant sample. Totally, 500 segments of M. sinensis and 400 segments of P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches were placed on 1% malt extract and incubated at 23°C in the dark for 2 weeks. Isolated fungal species were microscopically observed and purified. The root endophyte detection rate (%) for each fungus was calculated using the following formula:
(3) |
Where Nd is the number of root segments from which the fungus was detected, and Nt is the total number of root segments used for fungal isolation.
The genera of the most frequent isolates were identified by morphological observation. Root endophytes detected at high frequencies were identified using morphological characteristics and molecular analysis. DNA templates were prepared from a small piece of mycelial mass, crushed in 50 μL of sterilized water, and heated for 15 s in a microwave oven. The ITS regions were amplified using the primers ITS5 and ITS4 [44]. The PCR conditions included an initial denaturing step at 94°C for 4 min, 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 52°C for 50 s, and 72°C for 50 s, and a final elongation at 74°C for 6 min. The reaction mixture included 25 μL of GoTaq master mix (Promega Co., Ltd., Madison, WI, USA), 10 pmol of each primer, and 1 μL of DNA template. Amplicons were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), sequenced with a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing FS Ready Reaction Kit ver. 3.1, and analyzed using an ABI3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For molecular identification, the sequences were subjected to BLAST comparisons in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS Statistics software for Windows (ver. 26.0.0.1, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Differences in temperature, diurnal range, water content, pH (H2O), harmful metal concentrations, and available Fe concentration in the soil outside and inside the patches were evaluated using the Student’s t-test. Differences in infection rates of root endophytes and concentrations of harmful metals, nutrient elements, and harmful metal detoxicants in P. densiflora seedlings were evaluated using Student’s t-test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. The water content in the soil and infection rates of the root endophytes were statistically analyzed after arcsine transformation.
The concentrations of harmful metals in M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedling tissues and transfer factors of harmful metals in M. sinensis were evaluated using one-factor analysis of variance (one-factor ANOVA, Scheffé post hoc test, P < 0.05).
Results
Survival rates and mortality factors of P. densiflora seedlings
From September 2019 to July 2020, the survival rates of P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches decreased sharply to approximately 30% and 65%, respectively (Fig 2). Throughout the sampling period, the survival rates of P. densiflora seedlings inside the patches were higher than those of seedlings outside the patches (Fig 2). There were no significant differences in mortality factors of the P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches; root diseases were the primary mortality factors (S1 Fig). Ceratobasidium bicorne was isolated from the roots of dead seedlings of P. densiflora outside patches as a possible pathogen (S1 Table). Dark-septate endophytes (DSEs) were frequently isolated from the roots of dead seedlings of P. densiflora outside and inside the patches (S1 Table).
Harmful metal concentrations, pH (H2O), water content, and temperature in soil outside and inside the patches
Soils outside and inside the patches contained high concentrations of Fe (Table 1) compared with those in common soils (40 g/kg dry weight (DW) [17]). There were no significant differences in harmful metal concentrations or pH (H2O) between soils outside and inside the patches (P > 0.05; Table 1). Throughout the sampling period, the water content of the soils inside the patches was significantly lower than that outside the patches (P < 0.001; Fig 3). The average of soil temperature outside the patches was significantly higher than that inside the patches (P < 0.001; Table 2). The highest/lowest soil temperatures were 33.8°C/19.4°C and 29.1°C/21.4°C outside and inside the patches, respectively (Table 2; S2 Fig) The average of diurnal range of soil temperature outside the patches was significantly larger than that inside the patches (P < 0.001; Table 2, S2 Fig).
Table 1. Harmful metal concentrations and pH (H2O).
Element (g/kg DW) | Outside soil | Inside soil |
---|---|---|
Al | 52.9 ± 5.9 | 60.4 ± 2.3 |
Cu | 10.7 ± 1.2 | 11.4 ± 0.5 |
Fe | 165.5 ± 18.3 | 198.5 ± 8.9 |
Mn | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.1 |
Zn | 19.0 ± 2.0 | 19.2 ± 1.1 |
Available Fe | N. D. | N. D. |
pH (H2O) | 7.73 ± 0.02 | 7.51 ± 0.09 |
DW; dry weight. There were no significant differences between the outside and inside patches using the Student’s t-test (P > 0.05, n = 4). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE).
Table 2. Soil temperature outside and inside the patches.
Outside (°C) | Inside (°C) | |
---|---|---|
Average | 25.2 ± 0.05*** | 24.4 ± 0.03 |
Maximum | 33.8 | 29.1 |
Minimum | 19.4 | 21.4 |
Diurnal range | 5.2 ± 0.2*** | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
Differences between treatments were evaluated using the Student’s t-test (*** P < 0.001, average of soil temperature, n = 2642; average of diurnal range, n = 112). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE).
Harmful metal and nutrient element concentrations in M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedlings
Although available Fe was not detected in the soils, M. sinensis contained markedly higher concentrations of Fe in the roots and root skins than other harmful metals (P < 0.05; Table 3A). Miscanthus sinensis contained high concentrations of Ca in all tissues (Table 3B), and the transfer factors of Al, Cu, Fe, and Zn were significantly higher in the root skin than in the other tissues (P < 0.05; Fig 4).
Table 3. Harmful metal and nutrient element concentrations in Miscanthus sinensis.
Element (mg/kg DW) | Above-ground part | Dead leaf | Rhizome | Root | Root skin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | |||||
Al | 216.1 ± 41.8ab | 183.6 ± 14.6bc | 147.1 ± 16.6a | 568.1 ± 172.3ab | 723.1 ± 127.3ab |
Cu | 25.2± 4.4a | 46.0 ± 4.5ab | 61.5 ± 18.4a | 168.2 ± 36.5ab | 435.7 ± 44.6a |
Fe | 288.0± 64.8bc | 395.7 ± 44.4d | 121.3 ± 14.4a | 842.0 ± 280.5b | 1661.2 ± 424.1b |
Mn | 24.7 ± 4.6a | 25.1 ± 5.2a | 12.2 ± 1.9a | 21.3 ± 4.2a | 34.6 ± 7.0a |
Zn | 448.5 ± 69.5c | 320.6 ± 44.1cd | 596.7 ± 57.0b | 746.6 ± 130.3ab | 848.7 ± 82.8ab |
(b) | |||||
Ca | 18076.5 ± 2633.1a | 14758.2 ± 1719.3a | 15840.9 ± 1058.9a | 21430.8 ± 4392.2a | 18267.0 ± 1191.8a |
K | 9211.0 ± 739.2b | 1553.8 ± 251.9b | 5374.9 ± 1089.4b | 1958.2 ± 324.6b | 311.5 ± 10.8b |
Mg | 2209.5 ± 182.9c | 1416.2 ± 166.8b | 1629.9 ± 126.6c | 905.5 ± 110b | 961.0 ± 161.5b |
P | 708.2 ± 68.3c | 206.5 ± 8.9b | 392.5 ± 75.9c | 188.0 ± 11.3b | 88.6 ± 6.5b |
DW; dry weight. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments in one-factor ANOVA, Scheffé post-hoc test, P < 0.05 (n = 5). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE).
Pinus densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches contained high concentrations of Al and Fe in their roots (Table 4). Concentrations of Fe were significantly higher than those of other harmful metals (P < 0.05; S2 Table). In September 2020, hypocotyls inside the patches contained significantly higher concentrations of Zn than those inside the patches (P < 0.01; Table 4). In September 2021, hypocotyls of P. densiflora seedlings inside the patches contained lower Mn concentrations than those of seedlings outside patches (P < 0.01; Table 4). In terms of nutrient element concentrations, in July 2020, P. densiflora seedlings inside the patches contained significantly higher concentrations of K in leaves, hypocotyls, and roots than those in seedlings outside the patches, and P. densiflora seedling roots inside the patches contained significantly lower concentrations of Mg than those of seedlings outside the patches (P < 0.05; Table 5). In September 2020, P. densiflora seedlings inside the patches contained significantly lower Ca and Mg concentrations in leaves (P < 0.05) and Mg concentrations in hypocotyls (P < 0.01) than those of seedlings outside the patches (Table 5). In July 2021, P. densiflora seedlings inside the patches contained significantly lower Ca concentrations in leaves and hypocotyls (P < 0.05) and significantly higher K concentrations in hypocotyls (P < 0.001) than seedlings outside the patches (Table 5). In September 2021, P. densiflora seedlings inside the patches contained significantly lower Ca concentrations in the leaf and hypocotyl (P < 0.05) and significantly higher hypocotyl K concentrations (P < 0.001) than the seedlings outside the patches (Table 5).
Table 4. Harmful metal concentrations in Pinus densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches.
Element (mg/kg DW) | Leaf | Hypocotyl | Root | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outside | Inside | Outside | Inside | Outside | Inside | |
Jul. 2020 | ||||||
Al | 83.2 ± 8.4 | 120.3 ± 16.9 | 184.2 ± 24.9 | 183.1 ± 29.7 | 4486.7 ± 275.5 | 4556.7 ± 743.5 |
Cu | 12.2 ± 2.6 | 13.3 ± 2.6 | 33.0 ± 5.4 | 48.2 ± 11.7 | 1121.7 ± 82.9 | 1389.0 ± 218.6 |
Fe | 122.1 ± 30.9 | 144.7 ± 42.3 | 274.1 ± 64.8 | 324.8 ± 70.5 | 8002.7 ± 580.5 | 9157.4 ± 1764.4 |
Mn | 51.2 ± 6.5 | 43.5 ± 6.7 | 20.3 ± 1.6 | 15.4 ± 2.0 | 99.6 ± 9.4 | 86.5 ± 10.8 |
Zn | 123.4 ± 13.8 | 169.1 ± 38.2 | 168.0 ± 18.9 | 202.0 ± 30.3 | 1302.9 ± 89.3 | 1712.4 ± 197.2 |
Sep. 2020 | ||||||
Al | 116.8 ± 15.0 | 173.1 ± 51.2 | 187.5 ± 12.4 | 204.1 ± 20.2 | 2893.4 ± 210.6 | 2634.7 ± 228.2 |
Cu | 19.9 ± 1.9 | 29.2 ± 9.6 | 167.1 ± 118.5 | 85.3 ± 9.9 | 868.4 ± 87.3 | 959.2 ± 83.1 |
Fe | 208.5 ± 25.3 | 394.3 ± 160.5 | 286.8 ± 24.9 | 387.9 ± 62.3 | 5065.4 ± 505.1 | 5752.5 ± 502.8 |
Mn | 51.8 ± 6.2 | 39.5 ± 4.5 | 17.8 ± 1.4 | 15.5 ± 0.7 | 100.6 ± 16.2 | 70.9 ± 8.8 |
Zn | 147.3 ± 17.1 | 215.3 ± 32.9 | 177.3 ± 15.1 | 330.6 ± 38.7** | 900.2 ± 78.5 | 1175.7 ± 154.5 |
Jul. 2021 | ||||||
Al | 92.8 ± 30.3 | 61.5 ± 20.2 | 398.5 ± 43.7 | 278.5 ± 74.1 | 6085.9 ± 531.7 | 4798.0 ± 930.1 |
Cu | 28.3 ± 11.2 | 12.2 ± 8.1 | 231.6 ± 62.0 | 207.5 ± 82.0 | 2718.7 ± 442.7 | 2228.9 ± 382.3 |
Fe | 195.6 ± 83.4 | 118.3 ± 35.1 | 625.7 ± 86.0 | 502.8 ± 118.9 | 7842.5 ± 963.8 | 8143.8 ± 1667.5 |
Mn | 19.5 ± 4.0 | 16.2 ± 2.5 | 28.7 ± 3.4 | 24.3 ± 4.6 | 145.3 ± 12.3 | 157.5 ± 38.8 |
Zn | 101.9 ± 45.8 | 89.8 ± 11.8 | 407.9 ± 75.8 | 344.2 ± 62.1 | 1914.9 ± 244.6 | 2009.8 ± 317.4 |
Sep. 2021 | ||||||
Al | 132.1 ± 31.2 | 65.7 ± 19.6 | 434.4 ± 114.7 | 198.4 ± 21.4 | 4565.2 ± 601.5 | 3826.1 ± 395.9 |
Cu | 17.8 ± 6.5 | 7.9 ± 1.9 | 177.7 ± 47.5 | 101.9 ± 22.0 | 1645.5 ± 195.8 | 2014.4 ± 184.9 |
Fe | 247.9 ± 67.2 | 147.2 ± 38.1 | 878.8 ± 287.2 | 293.0 ± 35.7 | 7302.8 ± 1061.3 | 6504.7 ± 1108.4 |
Mn | 32.7 ± 5.4 | 22.5 ± 6.1 | 22.8 ± 4.3** | 8.5 ± 1.3 | 121.0 ± 16.3 | 116.0 ± 19.3 |
Zn | 128.5 ± 15.7 | 139.0 ± 29.0 | 371.8 ± 75.0 | 257.4 ± 37.3 | 1435.9 ± 180.7 | 1770.0 ± 161.7 |
DW; dry weight. Differences between treatments were evaluated using the Student’s t-test (** P < 0.01, n = 8). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE).
Table 5. Nutrient element concentrations in Pinus densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches.
Element (mg/kg DW) | Leaf | Hypocotyl | Root | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outside | Inside | Outside | Inside | Outside | Inside | |
Jul. 2020 | ||||||
Ca | 7793.2 ± 674.6 | 7438.4 ± 960.0 | 3830.4 ± 400.0 | 3856.2 ± 490.3 | 11381.5 ± 793.0 | 11045.7 ± 845.4 |
K | 3563.7 ± 465.5 | 5425.4 ± 485.6* | 2637.7 ± 241.3 | 3635.0 ± 369.4* | 3073.6 ± 375.2 | 4967.3 ± 726.4* |
Mg | 1166.5 ± 76.2 | 1281.5 ± 120.4 | 1033.9 ± 137.6 | 861.2 ± 113.7 | 1734.7 ± 108.5* | 1470.3 ± 49.5 |
P | 1084.4 ± 99.1 | 1072.7 ± 222.3 | 1433.2 ± 186.5 | 1359.5 ± 410.1 | 1366.9 ± 91.0 | 1589.8 ± 330.8 |
Sep. 2020 | ||||||
Ca | 10920.5 ± 923.1* | 7888.9 ± 961.0 | 3937.9 ± 413 | 3829.4 ± 351.9 | 8994.1 ± 1109.7 | 9575.5 ± 2054.6 |
K | 4985.2 ± 599.2 | 6088.8 ± 675.1 | 3702.0 ± 182.6 | 4405.5 ± 380.3 | 2508.1 ± 316.5 | 2767.7 ± 192.8 |
Mg | 1671.2 ± 151.9* | 1255.6 ± 73.9 | 778.5 ± 38.9** | 614.8 ± 20.2 | 1154.2 ± 87.7 | 956.6 ± 56.6 |
P | 965.3 ± 198.4 | 699.1 ± 41.8 | 992.1 ± 165.5 | 790.2 ± 41.9 | 913.9 ± 120.9 | 761.4 ± 38.8 |
Jul. 2021 | ||||||
Ca | 5163.8 ± 691.4* | 2975.3 ± 286.5 | 8219.9 ± 506.8** | 5314.6 ± 717.4 | 26717.5 ± 3974.2 | 18259.4 ± 2883.9 |
K | 6373.8 ± 554.9 | 5910.7 ± 1019.0 | 4580.6 ± 443.6 | 7087.5 ± 1287.1 | 2951.1 ± 519.1 | 3411.7 ± 327.7 |
Mg | 871.3 ± 107.5 | 785.5 ± 69.0 | 736.1 ± 54.6 | 713.5 ± 44.3 | 1505.2 ± 103.6* | 1187.7 ± 95.0 |
P | 416.7 ± 43.7 | 373.0 ± 16.0 | 456.6 ± 37.6 | 412.3 ± 31.9 | 606.0 ± 28.1 | 607.2 ± 48.1 |
Sep. 2021 | ||||||
Ca | 9954.7 ± 1265.1* | 5634.2 ± 738.2 | 6998.4 ± 553.6* | 5184.1 ± 466.3 | 22211.5 ± 2883.7 | 21715.5 ± 2753.1 |
K | 3788.1 ± 471.9 | 4756.8 ± 485.0 | 2844.3 ± 273.7 | 4491.3 ± 165.7*** | 1099.4 ± 158.6 | 1963.6 ± 418.3 |
Mg | 1756.8 ± 178.7 | 1324.5 ± 128.0 | 887.8 ± 90.9 | 763.4 ± 47.9 | 1517.6 ± 174.0 | 1517.1 ± 79.3 |
P | 352.7 ± 31.4 | 385.1 ± 32.8 | 379.7 ± 31.3 | 463.6 ± 48.4 | 409.8 ± 66.1 | 389.1 ± 18.7 |
DW; dry weight. Differences between treatments were evaluated using the Student’s t-test (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, n = 8). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE).
Fe detoxicants in roots of M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedlings
HPLC/ESI-MS analysis of the phenolic compounds in M. sinensis roots detected m/z: 355 ([M+H]+), m/z: 377 ([M+Na]+), m/z: 393 ([M+K]+), and m/z: 353 ([M-H]-), resulting in a molecular weight of 354. HPLC/ESI-MS and HPLC-DAD analyses revealed that the phenolic compound was chlorogenic acid. The concentration of chlorogenic acid was 1.23 ± 0.20 μg/mg fresh weight (FW) in M. sinensis roots.
HPLC/ESI-MS analysis of the phenolic compounds in the roots of P. densiflora seedlings detected m/z of 291 ([M+H]+) and m/z of 289 ([M-H]-), resulting in a molecular weight of 290. HPLC/ESI-MS and HPLC-DAD analyses revealed that the phenolic compound was catechin. In July 2020, P densiflora seedlings outside the patches contained significantly higher concentrations of condensed tannins than those inside the patches (P < 0.05; Fig 5B). GC/MS analysis showed that P. densiflora seedlings produced malic acid. The concentrations of each compound in the roots of P. densiflora seedlings are shown in Fig 5.
Infection rate and detection rates of root endophytes in M. sinensis and P. densiflora
Microscopic observation of trypan-blue-stained roots of M. sinensis revealed that the infection rates of AM mycorrhiza and endophyte were 1.9 ± 0.5% and 39.3 ± 3.6%, respectively. Root endophyte infection was observed in P. densiflora seedlings both outside and inside the patches (Fig 6). In contrast, infection by AM mycorrhiza and ectomycorrhiza was not observed (Fig 6).
The three genera of root endophytes frequently isolated from roots of M. sinensis were Magnaporthaceae sp. (detection rate, 9.8%), Cladophialophora sp. (9.0%), and Aquapteridospora sp. (7.2%). The two genera of root endophytes isolated at a frequency higher than 1% from the roots of P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches were C. bicorne and Aquapteridospora sp. (Fig 7). Several root endophytes with melanized dark hyphae and septate are classified as DSEs [45,46]. Aquapteridospora sp. had dark hyphae and septate, indicating that the root endophyte is considered as a DSE.
Discussion
At the study site, plants were exposed to high soil temperatures and heavy metal stress. Miscanthus sinensis formed patches to improve P. densiflora survival in our study site (Fig 2). Environmental factors influenced by pioneer species, such as M. sinensis include mitigation of strong wind disturbance [17], alleviation of heavy metal toxicity [47,48], supply of nutrient elements such as P [49], soil moisture retention [50,51], suppression of soil temperature alteration [52], and pH buffering capacity [53]. These functions of M. sinensis would improve environmental conditions, resulting in increased P. densiflora survival rates. Miscanthus sinensis contained high concentrations of Fe in its roots, and Fe tolerance mechanisms such as the production of chlorogenic acid and exclusion mechanisms such as root skin turnover were observed, which was consistent with our previous report [20]. Pioneer species with high turnover rates provide litter and improve the soil environment [48], implying that M. sinensis can improve the soil conditions inside the patches. Harmful metals were not transferred into the aboveground parts of M. sinensis (Fig 4), which suggested that M. sinensis would provide litter containing low concentrations of harmful metals to the soil. However, there were no significant differences between harmful metal concentrations outside and inside the patches (Table 1), indicating that M. sinensis could not decrease the concentrations of harmful metals in the soil. There were no differences in pH (H2O) between the outside and inside patches (Table 1). These results indicate that the soil properties mentioned above did not affect the survival rate of P. densiflora seedlings. Soil water content (Fig 3), average of soil temperature, and diurnal range (Table 2, S2 Fig) showed significant differences between the outside and inside the patches. Pinus densiflora can ordinally grow at 30% water content in soil [54], and an average of soil temperature within 22°C±5°C cannot inhibit the plant growth [55–57]. Therefore, water content and average soil temperature would not affect P. densiflora seedling survival at the study site. In contrast, a large diurnal range in soil temperature damages root systems and inhibits the growth of Capsicum annum [52]. In addition, sharp changes in soil temperature inhibit root growth [58], and root respiration decreases from 32°C to 35°C [55]. Because vegetation was not observed outside the patches (Fig 1), sunlight could directly reach the soil and raise the soil temperature to 33.8°C (Table 2; S2 Fig). These results indicated that the outside of the patches would not be suitable for P. densiflora seedling survival. Therefore, M. sinensis would suppress the excessive increase and sharp alternation of soil temperature to reduce environmental stress in P. densiflora seedlings, which facilitated the establishment of P. densiflora and enhanced vegetation succession.
Plants naturally growing in heavy metal environments can adapt to heavy-metal stress [15–17]. Seedlings of P. densiflora outside and inside the patches contained particularly high concentrations of Fe among the harmful metals (P < 0.05; S2 Table), indicating that P. densiflora seedlings would show Fe tolerance. There were no differences between the concentrations of harmful metals in P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches (Table 4). These results suggested that M. sinensis would not suppress P. densiflora seedlings to absorb Fe via competition of Fe uptake between M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedlings. Pinus densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches produce catechin, condensed tannin, and malic acid, which chelate and detoxify Fe [59–61] to acquire Fe tolerance. Condensed tannin production is enhanced by high temperatures [62]. In July 2020, condensed tannin production was enhanced in P. densiflora seedlings outside the patches (Fig 5), suggesting that the seedlings outside the patches were exposed to high soil temperature stress, as soil temperatures outside the patches were more easily elevated (Fig 4). These results indicate that P. densiflora seedlings produce Fe detoxicants to adapt to heavy metal environments, and M. sinensis would protect P. densiflora seedlings from high soil temperature stress.
Root endophytes, AM mycorrhiza, and ectomycorrhiza increase heavy metal tolerance in plants [25–27,29,63–65]. Ectomycorrhiza can infect P. densiflora and enhance nutrient uptake [66]. However, under heavy metal stress, infection is inhibited, and root endophytes can infect plants instead of ectomycorrhiza. In a volcanic desert, Salix reinii infected with ectomycorrhiza can grow on patches formed by Reynoutria japonica [67]. However, in the present study, P. densiflora seedlings were not infected by ectomycorrhizal fungi but by root endophytes (Fig 6). The growth of ectomycorrhiza is inhibited by high concentrations of heavy metals in the soil to suppress infection in plants [68]. Therefore, root endophytes could contribute to Fe tolerance in P. densiflora seedlings in heavy metal environments. There were no differences between the root endophyte species isolated from P. densiflora seedlings outside and inside the patches, and C. bicorne and Aquapteridospora sp. were isolated at a high frequency. The root endophytic Ceratobasidium sp. enhances the growth of Malus domestica via increasing nutrient uptake [69]. As there are no reports on the enhancement of heavy metal tolerance by Ceratobasidium sp., inoculation tests using C. bicorne and P. densiflora seedlings under heavy metal stress should be conducted to clarify the contribution of C. bicorne to Fe tolerance in P. densiflora seedlings. Aquapteridospora sp. was discovered in 2015 and was classified as a new genus [70,71]. Aquapteridospora sp. had melanized dark hyphae, meaning that Aquapteridospora sp. could be a DSE. Several DSEs increased the growth and tolerance of the host plants, Medicago sativa and Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, under cadmium stress [72]. However, the effects of Aquapteridospora sp. on heavy metal tolerances in plants remain unclear. In this study, Aquapteridospora sp. was isolated from the roots of M. sinensis and P. densiflora seedlings inside the patches (Fig 7), suggesting that M. sinensis might provide Aquapteridospora sp. to P. densiflora seedlings. Therefore, Aquapteridospora sp. is an interesting fungus with ecophysiological functions. Inoculation tests on P. densiflora seedlings under heavy metal stress should be conducted to determine the function of Aquapteridospora sp. at the study site.
Colonization in plant tissues by root endophytes without symptoms is established by balanced antagonism between the host and endophyte; therefore, environmental stress and plant conditions could change the interactions between plants and root endophytes from symbiotic to pathogenic or saprophytic [73]. A previous report [74] classified endophytes into four categories below; Class 1 endophytes are Clavicipitaceous, Class 2 endophytes could show weakly pathogenic and saprophytic functions, Class 3 endophytes could infect only stems and leaves without diseases, Class 4 endophytes with dark septate hyphae could infect roots without pathogenic functions. For example, DSEs classified into Class 4 could increase heavy metal tolerance in plants [27,75] and saprophytically decompose dead plant tissues [76]. Because Class 4 endophytes do not show pathogenic functions [74], DSEs including Aquapteridospora sp., isolated from dead P. densiflora seedling roots (S1 Table) would grow saprophytically after P. densiflora seedlings died rather than as a mortality factor. Ceratobasidium bicorne isolated from P. densiflora seedlings outside patches at a high frequency (Fig 7) is classified as a Class 2 endophyte, suggesting that C. bicorne might exhibit pathogenic functions according to P. densiflora seedling conditions. Outside the patches, excessive increases and sharp changes in soil temperature were observed (Table 2; S2 Fig). The severe environment might weaken P. densiflora seedlings outside patches via suppressing defense systems [55,58], to change the interaction with C. bicorne, which might be not endophytic but weakly pathogenic. These results suggest that M. sinensis patch would suppress the sharp increase and alteration in soil temperature, which seem to be main stress for P. densiflora seedlings to survive under the sedimentary site. Previously, M. sinensis is thought to suppress the establishment of tree seedlings by competition of nutrient uptake and making shade [77]. However, our study indicated that M. sinensis would provide an appropriate environment via controlling soil temperature. As the results, M. sinensis could promote vegetation succession by P. densiflora establishment. In the future, inoculation tests using sterilized P. densiflora seedlings with C. bicorne, Aquapteridospora sp., or a mixture of both root endophytes under high soil temperature and heavy metal stresses should be conducted to clarify the contribution of C. bicorne and Aquapteridospora sp. to the Fe tolerance of P. densiflora seedlings. From the inoculation test, measurement of Fe concentration and detoxification and mortality rate in P. densiflora seedlings can be used to understand the contribution of both root endophytes to the establishment of P. densiflora at our study site.
Conclusion
We studied the mechanisms by which M. sinensis could facilitate the survival of P. densiflora seedlings in the sedimentary site, which exposes plants to high soil temperature and Fe stress. Pinus densiflora seedlings produce Fe detoxicants to adapt to Fe stress. In contrast, high soil temperature would weaken P. densiflora seedlings and root endophytic C. bicorne might cause weak pathogenicity to reduce P. densiflora establishment in our study site. Up to the present, M. sinensis is thought to suppress the establishment of tree seedlings. However, in our study site, M. sinensis might promote the establishment of P. densiflora seedlings by suppressing environmental stresses and providing a DSE, Aquapteridospora sp, which would allow P. densiflora to adapt in severe environments, resulting in vegetation succession.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the technical supports for ICP-OES analysis performed at the Open Facility, Re-search Facility for Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba. We would like to also thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
TH received award from the JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers JP19K20473 URL: https://www.jsps.go.jp/j-grantsinaid/), and KY recieved award from the JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers JP19H01161; URL: https://www.jsps.go.jp/j-grantsinaid/).
References
- 1.Skousen J, Zipper CE, Rose A, Ziemkiewicz PF, Nairn R, McDonald LM, et al. Review of passive systems for acid mine drainage treatment. Mine Water Environ. 2017;36: 133–153. doi: 10.1007/s10230-016-0417-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J, Adriaensen K, Ruttens A, et al. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2009;16: 765–794. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0213-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Galende MA, Becerril JM, Barrutia O, Artetxe U, Garbisu C, Hernández A. Field assessment of the effectiveness of organic amendments for aided phytostabilization of a Pb-Zn contaminated mine soil. J Geochem Explor. 2014;145: 181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.06.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rahman MA, Lee SH, Ji HC, Kabir AH, Jones CS, Lee KW. Importance of mineral nutrition for mitigating aluminum toxicity in plants on acidic soils: current status and opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018;19: 3073. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Du H, Huang Y, Qu M, Li Y, Hu X, et al. A maize ZmAT6 gene confers aluminum tolerance via reactive oxygen species scavenging. Front. Plant Sci. 2020;11: 1016. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schützendübel A, Polle A. Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal‐induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. J Exp Bot. 2002;53: 1351–1365. doi: 10.1093/jxb/53.372.1351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Poschenrieder C, Gunsé B, Corrales I, Barceló J. A glance into aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Sci Total Environ. 2008;400: 356–368. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hayat S, Khalique G, Irfan M, Wani AS, Tripathi BN, Ahmad A. Physiological changes induced by chromium stress in plants: an overview. Protoplasma. 2012;249: 599–611. doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0331-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gill SS, Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Macovei A, Tuteja N. Importance of nitric oxide in cadmium stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013;63: 254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yakun S, Xingmin M, Kairong L, Hongbo S. Soil characterization and differential patterns of heavy metal accumulation in woody plants grown in coal gangue wastelands in Shaanxi, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016;23: 13489–13497. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6432-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lokeshwari H, Chandrappa GT. Impact of heavy metal contamination of Bellandur Lake on soil and cultivated vegetation. Curr Sci. 2006;91: 622–627. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brooks RR, Chambers MF, Nicks LJ, Robinson BH. Phytomining. Trends Plant Sci. 1998;3: 359–362. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01283-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mosseler A, Major JE. Phytoremediation efficacy of Salix discolor and S. eriocephela on adjacent acidic clay and shale overburden on a former mine site: growth, soil, and foliage traits. Forests. 2017;8: 475. doi: 10.3390/f8120475 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shen ZJ, Wang YP, Sun QY, Wang W. Effect of vegetation succession on organic carbon, carbon of humus acids and dissolved organic carbon in soils of copper mine tailings sites. Pedosphere. 2014;24: 271–279. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60013-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilkins DA. The measurement of tolerance to edaphic factors by means of root growth. New Phytol. 1978;80: 623–633. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01595.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B, Ramakrishnan M, Singh Sidhu GP, et al. Photosynthetic response of plants under different abiotic stresses: a review. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020;39: 509–531. doi: 10.1007/s00344-019-10018-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Larcher W. Physiological plant ecology. German ed. "Ökophysiologie der pflanzen, 6. auflage", published in. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2003. Translated version in 2001 by Verlag Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hiroi T. Phytosociological research in copper mine vegetation, Japan. J Humanit Nat Sci. 1974;38: 177–226. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Horie H, Nemoto M. Effects of soil pH and aluminium on the growth of Miscanthus sinensis Anderss. Weed Res Japan. 1990;35: 292–295. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haruma T, Yamaji K, Masuya H, Hanyu K. Root endophytic Chaetomium cupreum promotes plant growth and detoxifies aluminum in Miscanthus sinensis Andersson growing at the acidic mine site. Plant Species Biol. 2018;33: 109–122. doi: 10.1111/1442-1984.12197 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55: 373–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sharma SS, Dietz KJ. The relationship between metal toxicity and cellular redox imbalance. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14: 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singh VP, Srivastava PK, Prasad SM. Differential effect of UV-B radiation on growth, oxidative stress and ascorbate–glutathione cycle in two cyanobacteria under copper toxicity. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012;61: 61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Singh S, Parihar P, Singh R, Singh VP, Prasad SM. Heavy metal tolerance in plants: role of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and ionomics. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6: 1143. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jeffries P, Gianinazzi S, Perotto S, Turnau K, Barea JM. The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biol Fertil Soils. 2003;37: 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0546-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Colpaert JV, Wevers JHL, Krznaric E, Adriaensen K. How metal-tolerant ecotypes of ectomycorrhizal fungi protect plants from heavy metal pollution. Ann Forest Sci. 2011;68: 17–24. doi: 10.1007/s13595-010-0003-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li T, Liu MJ, Zhang XT, Zhang HB, Sha T, Zhao ZW. Improved tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.) to heavy metals by colonization of a dark septate endophyte (DSE) Exophiala pisciphila. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409: 1069–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nagata S, Yamaji K, Nomura N, Ishimoto H. Root endophytes enhance stress-tolerance of Cicuta virosa L. growing in a mining pond of eastern Japan. Plant Species Biol. 2015;30: 116–125. doi: 10.1111/1442-1984.12039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yamaji K, Watanabe Y, Masuya H, Shigeto A, Yui H, Haruma T. Root fungal endophytes enhance heavy-metal stress tolerance of Clethra barbinervis growing naturally at mining sites via growth enhancement, promotion of nutrient uptake and decrease of heavy-metal concentration. PLOS ONE. 2016;11: e0169089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.FAO. World reference base for soil resources 2014: international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lunt HA, Swanson CLW, Jacobson HGM. The Morgan soil testing system. New Haven: Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station; 1951. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gerke J, Römer W, Jungk A. The excretion of citric and malic acid by proteoid roots of Lupinus albus L.; effects on soil solution concentrations of phosphate, iron, and aluminum in the proteoid rhizosphere in samples of an oxisol and a luvisol. Z Pflanzenernahr Bodenk. 1994;157: 289–294. doi: 10.1002/jpln.19941570408 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Frérot H, Lefèbvre C, Gruber W, Collin C, Dos Santos AD, Escarré J. Specific interactions between local metallicolous plants improve the phytostabilization of mine soils. Plant Soil. 2006;282: 53–65. doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-5315-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mendez MO, Maier RM. Phytostabilization of mine tailings in arid and semiarid environments—an emerging remediation technology. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116: 278–283. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yamaji K, Ichihara Y. The role of catechin and epicatechin in chemical defense against damping‐off fungi of current-year Fagus crenata seedlings in natural forest. Forest Pathol. 2012;42: 1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00709.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Porter LJ, Hrstich LN, Chan BG. The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry. 1985;25: 223–230. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)94533-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yamaji K, Nagata S, Haruma T, Ohnuki T, Kozaki T, Watanabe N, et al. Root endophytic bacteria of a 137Cs and Mn accumulator plant, Eleutherococcus sciadophylloides, increase 137Cs and Mn desorption in the soil. J Environ Radioact. 2016;153: 112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Oba H, Saito K, Fujimiya M. Method in arbuscular mycorrhizal research (2) observation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonizing root. Soil Microorg. 2006;60: 57–61 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kubota M, Orikasa K, Asami T. Heavy metal concentrations in dusts and soils in Hitachi city, Japan. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 1986;57: 142–148 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 40.O’Dell TE, Massicotte HB, Trappe JM. Root colonization of Lupinus latifolius Agardh. and Pinus contorta Dougl. by Phialocephala fortinii Wang & Wilcox. New Phytol. 1993;124: 93–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03800.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Blasius D, Feil W, Kottke I, Oberwinkler F. Hartig net structure and formation in fully ensheathed ectomycorrhizas. Nord J Bot. 1986;6: 837–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1986.tb00487.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Giovannetti M, Mosse B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980;84: 489–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 1990;115: 495–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press; 1990. pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jumpponen ARI, Trappe JM. Dark septate endophytes: a review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytol. 1998;140: 295–310. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00265.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhu L, Li T, Wang C, Zhang X, Xu L, Xu R, Zhao Z. The effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) inoculation on tomato seedlings under Zn and Cd stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. 2018;25: 35232–35241. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3456-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lair GJ, Gerzabek MH, Haberhauer G. Sorption of heavy metals on organic and inorganic soil constituents. Environ Chem Lett. 2007;5: 23–27. doi: 10.1007/s10311-006-0059-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stefanowicz AM, Niklińska M, Laskowski R. Pollution-induced tolerance of soil bacterial communities in meadow and forest ecosystems polluted with heavy metals. Eur J Soil Biol. 2009;45: 363–369. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.05.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Keiblinger KM, Mooshammer M, Peñuelas J, Richter A, Sardans J, et al. The application of ecological stoichiometry to plant-microbial-soil organic matter transformations. Ecol Monogr. 2015;85: 133–155. doi: 10.1890/14-0777.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Parraga-Aguado I, Querejeta JI, González-Alcaraz MN, Jiménez-Cárceles FJ, Conesa HM. Usefulness of pioneer vegetation for the phytomanagement of metal(loid)s enriched tailings: grasses vs. shrubs vs. trees. J Environ Manage. 2014;133: 51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ni J, Cheng Y, Wang Q, Ng CWW, Garg A. Effects of vegetation on soil temperature and water content: field monitoring and numerical modelling. J Hydrol. 2019;571: 494–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Al-Kayssi AW, Al-Karaghouli AA, Hasson AM, Beker SA. Influence of soil moisture content on soil temperature and heat storage under greenhouse conditions. J Agric Eng Res. 1990;45: 241–252. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8634(05)80152-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.James BR, Riha SJ. pH buffering in forest soil organic horizons: relevance to acid precipitation. J Environ Qual. 1986;15: 229–234. doi: 10.2134/jeq1986.00472425001500030005x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kramer PJ, Boyer JS. Water relations of plants and soils. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Went FW. The effect of temperature on plant growth. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1953;4: 347–362. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.04.060153.002023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tindall JA, Mills HA, Radcliffe DE. The effect of root zone temperature on nutrient uptake of tomato. J Plant Nutr. 1990;13: 939–956. doi: 10.1080/01904169009364127 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hussain S, Maqsood MA. Root zone temperature influences nutrient accumulation and use in maize. Pak J Bot. 2011;43: 1551–1556. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Xia Z, Zhang S, Wang Q, Zhang G, Fu Y, Lu H. Effects of root zone warming on maize seedling growth and photosynthetic characteristics under different phosphorus levels. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12: 746152. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.746152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tiffin LO, Brown JC. Iron chelates in soybean exudate. Science. 1962;135: 311–313. doi: 10.1126/science.135.3500.311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chobot V, Huber C, Trettenhahn G, Hadacek F. (+/-)-catechin: chemical weapon, antioxidant, or stress regulator? J Chem Ecol. 2009;35: 980–996. doi: 10.1007/s10886-009-9681-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Karamać M. Chelation of Cu(II), Zn(II), and Fe(II) by tannin constituents of selected edible nuts. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10: 5485–5497. doi: 10.3390/ijms10125485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lees GL, Hinks CF, Suttill NH. Effect of high temperature on condensed tannin accumulation in leaf tissues of big trefoil (Lotus uliginosus Schkuhr). J Sci Food Agric. 1994;65: 415–421. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740650408 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jiang M, Cao L, Zhang R. Effects of Acacia (Acacia auriculaeformis A. Cunn)-associated fungi on mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Coss. var. foliosa Bailey) growth in Cd- and Ni-contaminated soils. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008;47: 561–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02454.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Deng Z, Zhang R, Shi Y, Hu L, Tan H, Cao L. Enhancement of phytoremediation of Cd- and Pb-contaminated soils by self-fusion of protoplasts from endophytic fungus Mucor sp. CBRF59. Chemosphere. 2013;91: 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Domka AM, Rozpaądek P, Turnau K. Are fungal endophytes merely mycorrhizal copycats? The role of fungal endophytes in the adaptation of plants to metal toxicity. Front Microbiol. 2019;10: 371. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dalong M, Luhe W, Guoting Y, Liqiang M, Chun L. Growth response of Pinus densiflora seedlings inoculated with three indigenous ectomycorrhizal fungi in combination. Braz J Microbiol. 2011;42: 1197–1204. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220110003000045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nara K, Nakaya H, Hogetsu T. Ectomycorrhizal sporocarp succession and production during early primary succession on Mount Fuji. New Phytol. 2003;158: 193–206. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00724.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zong K, Huang J, Nara K, Chen Y, Shen Z, Lian C. Inoculation of ectomycorrhizal fungi contributes to the survival of tree seedlings in a copper mine tailing. J For Res. 2015;20: 493–500. doi: 10.1007/s10310-015-0506-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Manici LM, Caputo F. Growth promotion of apple plants is the net effect of binucleate Rhizoctonia sp. as rhizosphere-colonizing fungus. Rhizosphere. 2020;13: 100185. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100185 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Yang J, Maharachchikumbura SSN, hydeb KD, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EhC, Bahkali AH, et al. Aquapteridospora lignicola gen. et sp. nov., a new hyphomycetous taxon (Sordariomycetes) from wood submerged in a freshwater stream. Cryptogam Mycol. 2015;36: 469–478. doi: 10.7872/crym/v36.iss4.2015.469 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Dong W, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Doilom M, Yu XD, Wang GN. Towards a natural classification of Annulatascaceae-like taxa Ⅱ: Introducing five new genera and eighteen new species from freshwater. Mycosphere. 2021;12: 1–88. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hou L, Yu J, Zhao L, He X. Dark septate endophytes improve the growth and the tolerance of Medicago sativa and Ammopiptanthus mongolicus under cadmium stress. Front. Microbiol. 2020;10: 3061. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Schulz BJE, Boyle CJC. What are endophytes? In: Schultz BJE, Boyle CJC, Sieber TN, editors. Microbial root endophytes. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1007/3-540-33526-9_1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rodriguez RJ, White JF Jr, Arnold AE, Redman RS. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol. 2009;182: 314–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wang JL, Li T, Liu GY, Smith JM, Zhao ZW. Unraveling the role of dark septate endophyte (DSE) colonizing maize (Zea mays) under cadmium stress: physiological, cytological and genic aspects. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 22028. doi: 10.1038/srep22028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Caldwell BA, Jumpponen A, Trappe JM. Utilization of major detrital substrates by dark-septate, root endophytes. Mycologia. 2000;92: 230–232. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2000.12061149 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lee CS, Moon JS, Cho YC. Effects of soil amelioration and tree planting on restoration of an air-pollution damaged forest in South Korea. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007;179: 239–254. doi: 10.1007/s11270-006-9228-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.