Background:
Glaucoma is a group of diseases that damage the optic nerve in the eye, resulting in vision loss and, in severe cases, blindness. The prevalence of glaucoma and glaucoma blindness is highest in West Africans.
Objective:
The study presents a 5-year retrospective analysis of intraocular pressure (IOP) and complications after trabeculectomy.
Materials and methods:
Trabeculectomy was performed using 5 mg/ml of 5-fluorouracil. A gentle diathermy was performed to secure hemostasis. Using a blade fragment of the scleral thickness, a 4×3 mm rectangular scleral flap was dissected. The central part of the flap was dissected 1 mm into the clear cornea. Before being tailed down, the patient was given topical 0.05% dexamethasone qid, 1% atropine tid, and 0.3% ciprofloxacin qid for 4–6 weeks. Patients with pain were given pain relievers, and all patients with photophobia were given sun protection. A successful surgical outcome was defined as a postoperative IOP of 20 mmHg or less.
Results:
There were 161 patients over the 5-year period under review, with men constituting 70.2% of the total. Out of 275 eyes operated on, 82.9% were bilateral cases, while 17.1% were unilateral. Glaucoma was found in both children and adults aged 11–82 years. However, it was observed to predominate between the ages of 51 and 60, with males having the highest incidence. The average preoperative IOP was 24.37 mmHg, while it was 15.24 mmHg postoperatively. The complication with the highest ranking was shallow anterior chamber (24; 8.73%) due to overfiltration, followed by leaking bleb (8; 2.91%). The most common late complications were cataract (32; 11.64%) and fibrotic bleb (8; 2.91%). Bilateral cataracts developed at an average of 25 months after trabeculectomy. It was seen in patients aged 2–3 with a frequency of 9, whereas 5 years after, 77 patients had improved vision, with a postoperative visual acuity of 6/18-6/6.
Conclusion:
Postoperatively, the patients had satisfying surgical outcomes as a result of the decrease in preoperative IOP. Although postoperative complications occurred, they had no effect on the surgical outcomes because they were temporary and not optically threatening. In our experience, trabeculectomy is an effective and safe procedure for achieving IOP control.
Keywords: glaucoma, intraocular pressure, postoperative outcome, trabeculectomy
Introduction
Highlights
Intraocular pressure (IOP) was at its peak at 51–60 years, with males having the highest incidence.
The patients were successfully managed with trabeculectomy, which is evident by the reduction in the IOP.
The average preoperative IOP was 24.37 mmHg, while it was 15.24 mmHg postoperatively.
Glaucoma is a set of disorders that damage the optic nerve of the eye, resulting in vision loss and, in severe cases, blindness. Globally, it is one of the main causes of blindness1,2. Glaucoma affects 80 million individuals globally, and this estimate is predicted to rise to more than 111 million by 20403. West Africans have the highest prevalence of glaucoma and glaucoma blindness4,5. In comparison to other regions, glaucoma cases in Africans have higher intraocular pressure (IOP) and occur at a younger age5. It progresses more quickly and presents late in the disease’s course, with up to 50% of patients already blind in one eye at presentation4. In Nigeria, glaucoma accounts for 0.7% of blindness in people aged 40 and above6. Blindness caused by glaucoma has a significant public health effect. The only evidence-based approach to treating glaucoma is to lower IOP7,8. Trabeculectomy is the most commonly used filtering surgery9 and is considered the gold standard for patients with progressive glaucoma who have not responded to medical or laser treatment10. Trabeculectomy, which has been shown to be more beneficial in Africans in terms of lowering IOP and slowing field loss11,12, reduces IOP by creating a continuous flow of aqueous from the anterior chamber (AC) to the subconjunctival space13–15. Despite the recent development of new microinvasive procedures16, trabeculectomy is the glaucoma procedure in our center as a low-resource setting. Our center has made significant efforts to perform the surgeries in order to achieve a controllable outcome, while also considering IOP when determining successful surgeries17–19. On that note, and in addition to the objective of adding to the data repository on trabeculectomy postoperative complications and outcomes, this study aimed to present a 5-year retrospective study of IOP control after trabeculectomy.
Materials and methods
Ethical consideration, inclusion and exclusion criteria
This retrospective study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital in 2017 and followed the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. This work fully complies with the STROCSS (strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case–control studies in surgery) 2021 requirements and is reported in accordance with the STROCSS criteria20. This research was retrospectively registered at https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now#user-researchregistry/registerresearchdetails/63ecab1e202dd4002803a2a7/, with the Research Registry Unique Identifying Number: 8682. The study included all patients who had a 5-year follow-up. They were phakic patients who had their first surgery at our facility. Patients who had repeat surgery, pseudophakics, or who did not finish the 5-year follow-up period were excluded from the study. Before surgery, all of the patients were on medication, some from other centers, with progression in the visual fields and optic nerve head. Those whose blood pressure was more than 20 mmHg were put on medication following surgery.
Study design and procedures
This is a retrospective cohort study in which the files of 161 patients who underwent trabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil 5 mg/ml were identified from the theater records and those with a follow-up period of up to 5 years (2017–2022) were included. In this study, success was defined as having an IOP of 20 mmHg or less. Glaucoma was diagnosed by IOP, central visual field 24-2, and cupped disk ratio (CDR) by ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Releasable suture was used to control overfiltration.
A 6/0 vicryl affixed to the drape was used to place a corneal traction suture, and a fornix base conjunctival flap was raised nasally. Hemostasis was secured by cautery. A rectangular scleral flap of 4×3 mm was dissected with a razor blade fragment half the scleral thickness; the central part of the flap was dissected 1 mm into the clear cornea. An antimetabolite sponge was placed under the flap and covered with the conjunctiva for 3 min, after which the area was well irrigated with a 10-ml syringe of balance salt solution (BSS) for 30 s. This was followed by a paracentesis with a 23-gauge needle for 2 h, from the scleral flap, and the anterior chamber was formed with BSS.
A 30° side port knife was used to enter the AC at the center of the flap. Kelly’s punch (1 mm) was used for trabeculectomy, and DeWecker scissors was used for iridectomy. The scleral flap was closed with 9/0 nylon and a releasable suture at one end, and the conjunctival flap was closed with 9/0 nylon. The AC was formed using BSS via paracentesis, and intracameral antibiotics of 0.1 ml of 5 mg/ml ceftriaxone were given, followed by a subconjunctival injection of 2 mg dexamethasone and 20 mg gentamycin, and a drop of 0.3% ciprofloxacin and 1% atropine. For 24 h, the eye was covered with a gauze and strapped in place with an eye shield.
The following day, the eye was opened and examined for the presence of bleb, corneal clarity, deep AC, flare in the AC, pupil size, lens clarity, and IOP. The patient was given topical 0.05% dexamethasone qid, 1% atropine tid, and 0.3% ciprofloxacin qid for 4–6 weeks before being tailed down. Pain reliever was given to patients with pain, and sun protection was given to all patients with photophobia. The long-term complications that the patients have encountered are presented and discussed.
Results
This study included a total of 161 patients, with 113 (70.2%) being male and 48 (29.8%) being female. There were a total of 275 eyes examined. Bilateral cases constituted 114 (82.9%) of all patients, while unilateral cases constituted 47 (17.1%), with 137 (49.8%) right eye (RE) and 138 (50.2%) left eye (LE) cases. The patients ranged in age from 11 to 82 years, with a mean of 53 years and a standard deviation of 53.17±15.26 years (Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of the patient
| Gender | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age range | Frequency | M | F |
| 11–20 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| 21–30 | 8 | 6 | 2 |
| 31–40 | 15 | 14 | 1 |
| 41–50 | 24 | 14 | 10 |
| 51–60 | 55 | 39 | 16 |
| 61–70 | 38 | 29 | 9 |
| 71–80 | 12 | 8 | 4 |
| 81–90 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
F, female; M, male.
The preoperative IOP for the RE was 24.34 mmHg on average, with a standard deviation of 24.34±8.48 mmHg as presented in Table 2. The preoperative IOP for the LE was 24.39 mmHg, with a standard deviation of 24.39±9.14 mmHg (Table 2). Postoperatively, the average IOP was 15.24 mmHg, with a standard deviation of 15.24±5.72 mmHg (Table 3), while the LE had an average pressure of 13.92 mmHg, with a standard deviation of 13.92±4.54 mmHg, as shown in Table 3. Table 4 displays the various average IOPs.
Table 2.
The preoperative intraocular pressures of the right and left eyes
| Right eye | Left eye | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOP | Frequency | M | F | IOP | Frequency | M | F |
| 0–10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0–10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11–20 | 50 | 38 | 12 | 11–20 | 57 | 39 | 18 |
| 21–30 | 62 | 40 | 22 | 21–30 | 53 | 36 | 17 |
| 31–40 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 31–40 | 18 | 13 | 5 |
| 41–50 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 41–50 | 9 | 6 | 3 |
| 51–60 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 51–60 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
F, female; IOP, intraocular pressure; M, male.
Table 3.
The postoperative intraocular pressures of the right and left eyes
| Right eye | Left eye | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOP | Frequency | M | F | IOP | Frequency | M | F |
| 0–10 | 39 | 27 | 12 | 0–10 | 37 | 27 | 10 |
| 11–20 | 87 | 59 | 28 | 11–20 | 92 | 61 | 31 |
| 21–30 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 21–30 | 9 | 7 | 2 |
| 31–40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 41–50 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
F, female; IOP, intraocular pressure; M, male.
Table 4.
Patients’ average preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressures
| Age range | Frequency | Average preoperative IOP (mmHg) | Average postoperative IOP (mmHg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11–20 | 8 | 26.25 | 11.86 |
| 21–30 | 8 | 25.88 | 13.81 |
| 31–40 | 15 | 20.07 | 15.53 |
| 41–50 | 24 | 24.85 | 15.33 |
| 51–60 | 55 | 24.96 | 14.39 |
| 61–70 | 38 | 24.39 | 14.34 |
| 71–80 | 12 | 24.63 | 13.40 |
| 81–90 | 1 | 24.50 | 07.00 |
IOP, intraocular pressure.
Shallow AC (24; 8.73%) was the most common early complication, followed by leaking bleb (8; 2.91%). Uveitis (3, 0.73%), corneal ulcer (3; 1.09%), and hyphema (3; 1.09%) were among the complications, but they were less common (Table 5). Cataract (32; 11.64%) and fibrotic bleb (8; 2.91%) were the most common late complications (Table 6). Corneal ulcer, iris incarceration at the osteom, and painful blind eye were the least common (1; 0.36%). There were nine cases of cataract developed after trabeculectomy, with patients aged 2–3 having the highest frequency of 9. Patients aged 4–5 had no cases of cataract (Table 7). A summary of visual acuity 5 years after trabeculectomy is provided in Table 8, with 28% (77) of patients having improved vision.
Table 5.
Early complications
| Complication | RE | LE | Total, N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shallow AC due to malignant glaucoma | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.73) |
| Uveitis | 3 | 0 | 3 (0.73) |
| Corneal ulcer | 1 | 2 | 3 (1.09) |
| Leaking bleb | 3 | 5 | 8 (2.91) |
| Shallow AC due to overfiltration | 16 | 8 | 24 (8.73) |
| Hyphema | 1 | 2 | 3 (1.09) |
AC, anterior chamber; LE, left eye; RE, right eye.
Table 6.
Late complications
| Complication | RE | LE | Total, N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blebitis | 2 | 0 | 2 (0.73) |
| Painful blind eye | 1 | 0 | 1 (0.36) |
| Cataract | 19 | 13 | 32 (11.64) |
| Fibrotic bleb | 3 | 5 | 8 (2.91) |
| Iris incarceration | 0 | 2 | 2 (0.72) |
| Leaking bleb | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.36) |
| Endophthalmitis | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.73) |
| Corneal ulcer | 0 | 1 | 1 (0.36) |
LE, left eye; RE, right eye.
Table 7.
The occurrence of cataracts following trabeculectomy
| Age (year) | Frequency |
|---|---|
| 0–1 | 7 |
| 1–2 | 6 |
| 2–3 | 9 |
| 3–4 | 0 |
| 4–5 | 3 |
Table 8.
Corrected visual acuity at 5 years versus the presenting vision
| Visual acuity | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients with better vision than presenting vision | 77 | 28 |
| Number of patients with the same vision as presenting vision | 141 | 51.27 |
| Number of patients with poor vision than presenting vision | 57 | 20.73 |
Discussion
The results in this report are from a 5-year retrospective analysis of IOP control following trabeculectomy at our center. Our findings revealed that glaucoma was more prevalent in the middle-aged and elderly groups (51–60), as shown in Table 1. Within this age group, the proportion of men with glaucoma (39) was higher than the proportion of women (16) with glaucoma (27.6% vs. 11.3%). According to the Vision Health Initiatives report, anyone can develop glaucoma; however, certain populations are more vulnerable, such as African Americans over the age of 40 and individuals over the age of 6021. Our findings are consistent with the Vision Health Initiative report and previous reports that it occurs in younger people5 and in those over the age of 406,22. Our findings showed that men are more likely than women to have glaucoma, which is consistent with the findings of Khachatryan et al.23, who investigated the relationship between gender and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in African Americans. It was observed that the male gender was significantly associated with the risk of POAG, the most common type of glaucoma23. In contrast to these findings, there is inconsistency in the gender that is predisposed to glaucoma. According to Vajaranant et al.22, women are more likely to develop angle closure glaucoma than men, but there is no clear gender preference for open-angle glaucoma.
IOP is an important factor in assessing patients at risk of glaucoma. Glaucoma was confirmed preoperatively by measuring IOP, which was found to be abnormally high with values above 21 mmHg in the eyes of a large population of 53–62 patients, particularly the male gender (Table 2). In a parallel comparison with postoperative surgical outcomes (Table 3), IOP was reduced to a normal level of 15.24 mmHg for the RE and 13.92 mmHg for the LE, both with P values of 0.05. The number of patients with normal IOP values for the REs increased significantly, reaching 15 and 56 down the column of the Table, respectively, and 36 and 94 for the LEs. The return of IOP to normal levels indicates a successful surgical outcome in glaucoma surgery using trabeculectomy9,10,24.
As shown in Table 3, the IOP was not completely restored to normal in all patients. A pressure of 21–30 mmHg was recorded in five patients, while 15 patients had a higher IOP of 41–50 mmHg. Only nine patients had an abnormal IOP of 21–30 mmHg in the LE. Although the primary goal of glaucoma treatment to reduce IOP and preserve visual function25,26 was achieved in this study, some patients had abnormal IOP after surgery (Table 3). This suggests that ocular hypertension had occurred, which is one of the predictors of postoperative IOP elevation26. However, the IOP returns to normal with time27. In our study, trabeculectomy resulted in a satisfactory surgical success rate, with an overall IOP reduction average of 14.35 mmHg (Table 4 and Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

A graph depicting the average intraocular pressure of patients before and after surgery. IOP, intraocular pressure.
Although trabeculectomy is a viable surgical option for treating glaucoma, it is not without side effects, which manifested as postoperative complications, as shown in Tables 5 and 6. The most common early postoperative complications were shallow AC (24; 8.73%) and leaking bleb (8; 2.91%), while cataract (32; 11.64%) and fibrotic bleb (8; 2.91%) were the most common late postoperative complications (Table 6). Our findings are consistent with previous studies, which found that shallow AC (13 eyes; 17.1%) was the most common early postoperative complication13,28,29. The reported early complications were transient in nature, and included minor complications such as uveitis, corneal ulcer, and hyphema in addition to the major complications. Other studies from Nigeria29 and North America28 found a similar pattern of fewer hyphema cases. This pattern has been attributed to ophthalmologists’ good surgical techniques and preventative measures13, which are followed in our center. Various types of complications have been reported following trabeculectomy, with the incidence varying depending on the length of follow-up, the study population, and surgical techniques such as the use of antimetabolite and releasable sutures13,30–32. A summary of the occurrence of cataract following trabeculectomy is presented in Table 7; while patients of various ages developed cataract, those aged 4–5 were cataract-free. Transient side effects after trabeculectomy are common and can last up to 2 years33,34. The majority of the complications were temporary and self-limiting. After surgery, 57 (20.73%) patients had poor vision, 51.27% had the same vision as before, and 28% had improved vision (Table 8). Patients with improved vision were a step or two better than their pre-intervention vision. This is due to the fact that the majority of patients had extremely high IOPs, which were reduced with a systemic hyperosmotic agent prior to surgery. It has been reported that trabeculectomy causes transient vision loss, with recovery times ranging from 6 to 720 days33,34.
In this study, the patients were followed-up for 5 years. Those with IOPs greater than 20 mmHg were prescribed medication, accounting for ∼11% of all eyes. Jung et al.24 reported that trabeculectomy required less postoperative IOP-lowering medications.
It is known that some patients experience vision loss following trabeculectomy; those who experienced vision loss were among those who received topical medicine to manage their pressure after surgery. Clear lens extraction is an option35; however, it imposes a greater financial burden on patients due to intraocular lens (IOL) insertion. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a possibility36, but it is beyond the reach of our institute. We intend to collaborate with other institutions in order to acquire MIGS skills. Also, exploring the use of a 23-gauge cystotome to perform goniotomy in a glaucoma patient is an intriguing idea36. It has been demonstrated that cystotome can make MIGS more accessible to Africa, African Diaspora countries, and low-income developing countries36.
The retrospective aspect of this study is one of its limitations. More specifically, the difficulties of ophthalmological practice in a resource-constrained situation, such as the inability to perform trabeculectomy with phacoemulsification and goniotomy in a single sitting, which would have produced a superior outcome.
Conclusion
In our center, trabeculectomy is a viable surgical option for treating glaucoma. It resulted in positive postoperative surgical outcomes for IOP reduction, with transient complications that did not pose a visual threat. In this study, those that have an IOP less than 20 mmHg had stable visual acuity and fields.
Ethical approval
This study adhered to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by our institution’s ethical committee with approval number: ECWA/EH/0034/2017.
Consent
Not applicable.
Sources of funding
This work did not receive any external funding.
Author contribution
M.O.A., A.J.O., and E.O.B.: conceptualization; M.O.A., A.J.O., S.E., and N.S.: methodology; M.O.A., A.J.O., U.I., O.K., and O.E.O.: experiments; M.O.A., A.J.O., I.M.M., and J.D.P.: data curation and formal analysis; E.J.D.: writing – original draft preparation; M.O.A., E.O.B., and E.J.D.: writing – reviewing and editing; J.D.P, E.J.D., M.O.A., A.J.O., and E.O.B.: statistical analysis and validation.
Conflicts of interest disclosure
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Guarantor
Dr Atima Mayor is in charge of our manuscript’s publication.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Footnotes
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Published online 15 April 2023
Contributor Information
Mayor Orezime Atima, Email: atimamatha@yahoo.com.
Ugbede Idakwo, Email: idaks50@yahoo.com.
Oyeronke Komolafe, Email: oyeronkekomolafe@gmail.com.
Ogho Emmanuel Otomi, Email: wonderfemmy@yahoo.com.
Shimizu Eisuke, Email: eisuke@ouiinc.jp.
Nakayama Shintaro, Email: p.shintaro@ouiinc.jp.
Emmanuel Oluwadare Balogun, Email: oluwadareus@yahoo.com.
Emeka John Dingwoke, Email: dinhimself@yahoo.com.
Ayodele Jacob Orugun, Email: ayorugun@yahoo.com.
Ignatius Melchizedek Munaje, Email: mmunaje@gmail.com.
Jah Douglas Pam, Email: pamdouglasjah@gmail.com.
References
- 1. Sacchi M, Monsellato G, Villani E, et al. Intraocular pressure control after combined phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy alone. Eur J Ophthalmol 2022;32:327–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:614–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tham Y-C, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2081–2090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ntim-Amponsah CT, Amoaku WM, Ofosu-Amaah S, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in an African population. Eye (Lond) 2004;18:491–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Budenz DL, Barton K, Schiffman J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in an urban West African population: The Tema Eye Survey. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131:651–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Abdul MM, Sivasubramaniam S, Murthy G, et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in Nigeria: the Nigerian blindness and visual impairment survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4114–4120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Vinod K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American Glaucoma Society. J Glaucoma 2017;26:687–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th ed. Editore PubliComm; 2014:1–191. [Google Scholar]
- 11. David R, Freedman J, Luntz MH. Comparative study of Watsons and Cairns trabeculectomies in a black population with open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1977;61:117–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Thommy CP, Bhar IS. Trabeculectomy in Nigerian patients with open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63:636–642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ashaye A, Komolafe O. Post-operative complication of trabeculectomy in Ibadan, Nigeria: outcome of 1-year follow-up. Eye 2009;23:448–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Caprioli J, Coleman AL. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1123–1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Arora KS, Robin AL, Corcoran KJ, et al. Use of Various Glaucoma Surgeries and Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries from 1994 to 2012. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1615–1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Birchall W, Bedggood A, Wells AP. Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy? Eye 2007;21:402–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR, et al. Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. Ophthalmology 2009;116:200–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Parrish RK, II, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, et al. Five-year follow-up optic disc findings of the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:717–724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mathew G, Agha R. for the STROCSS Group. STROCSS 2021: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case–control studies in surgery. Int J Surg 2021;96:106165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. CDC. Vision Health Initiative (2020). Don’t Let Glaucoma Steal Your Sight! Accessed 10 September 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/visionhealth/resources/features/glaucoma-awareness.html
- 22. Vajaranant TS, Nayak S, Wilensky JT, et al. Gender and glaucoma: what we know and what we need to know. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010;21:91–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Khachatryan N, Pistilli M, Maguire MG, et al. Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) Study: gender and risk of POAG in African Americans. PLoS One 2019;14:e0218804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jung JL, Isida-Llerandi CG, Lazcano-Gomez G, et al. Intraocular pressure control after trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy and phacoemulsification in a Hispanic population. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2014;8:67–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Coleman AL. Advances in glaucoma treatment and management: surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:2491–2494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kim JY, Jo MW, Brauner SC, et al. Increased intraocular pressure on the first postoperative day following resident-performed cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:929–936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mathalone N, Hyams M, Neiman S, et al. Long-term intraocular pressure control after clear corneal phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:479–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Jampel HD, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Perioperative complications of trabeculectomy in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study (CIGTS). Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:16–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Mielke C, Dawda VK, Anand N. Intraoperative 5-fluorouracil application during primary trabeculectomy in Nigeria: a comparative study. Eye (Lond) 2003;17:829–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kabiru J, Bowman R, Wood M, et al. Audit of trabeculectomy at a tertiary referral hospital in East Africa. J Glaucoma 2005;14:432–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Anand N, Melke C, Dawda VK. Trabeculectomy outcomes in advanced glaucoma in Nigeria. Eye 2001;15:274–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, et al. The National Survey of Trabeculectomy 111. Early and late complications. Eye 2002;16:297–3003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Francis BA, Hong B, Winarko J, et al. Vision loss and recovery after trabeculectomy: risk and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:1011–1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Murdoch I. Post-operative management of trabeculectomy in the first three months. Community Eye Health 2012;25:73–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Laroche D, Oseni J, Nkrumah G, et al. Clear lensectomy with Hydrus stent in Black and Afro-Latino patients: a 1-year retrospective study. J Ophthalmol 2022;2022:8011745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Laroche D, Okaka Y, Ng C. A novel low cost effective technique in using a 23 gauge straight cystotome to perform goniotomy: making micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) accessible to the Africans and the Diaspora. J Natl Med Assoc 2019;111:193–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
