Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2023 May 13;9(5):e16240. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16240

Pentachlorophenol-induced hemotoxicity diminishes antioxidant potential and oxidizes proteins, thiols, and lipids in rat blood: An in vivo study

Nikhil Maheshwari a,, Aijaz Ahmed Khan b, Riaz Mahmood a, Samreen Salam a
PMCID: PMC10205642  PMID: 37234629

Abstract

Pentachlorophenol (PCP) is an excessively used wood preservative and pesticide, which has resulted in human exposure raising concerns about its potential toxic effects. This study is designed to evaluate the hemotoxicity of PCP in adult rats. Wistar rats were orally administered PCP (25–150 mg/kg bw) for five days while untreated (control) rats received corn oil. Animals were sacrificed, blood was taken and fractionated into plasma and red blood cells (RBC). PCP administration increased methemoglobin formation but decreased methemoglobin reductase activity. Significantly increased hydrogen peroxide level indicates initiation of oxidative stress condition in blood. PCP increased the oxidation of thiols, proteins and lipids, lowered glutathione levels, and compromised the antioxidant status of RBC in treated rats. Enzymes of the pathways of glucose breakdown, glycolysis and phosphogluconate pathway, were inhibited. Markers of liver damage were increased in the plasma of PCP-treated rats suggesting hepatotoxicity. This was confirmed by histopathological analysis of stained liver sections. Activity of xanthine oxidase, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) generating pro-oxidant enzyme, was increased. These hematological changes could be a result of the increased generation of ROS or direct chemical transformation by transient reaction species. These results show that PCP induces redox imbalance, diminishes antioxidant potential, inhibits metabolic pathways, and oxidizes cellular components in rat blood.

This study suggests an elaborated possible molecular mechanism of PCP toxicity, and similar compounds so that methods can be devised to minimize its damaging effect.

Keywords: Pentachlorophenol, Oxidative stress, RBC, Antioxidant status, Liver, Histopathology

Highlights

  • Pentachlorophenol (PCP) increases pro-oxidant enzyme xanthine oxidase in plasma.

  • PCP enhances oxidation of thiols, proteins and lipids in rat blood.

  • PCP impairs the antioxidant status and inhibits enzymes of glucose breakdown.

  • PCP increases plasma AST and ALT levels and causes histological abrasions in liver.

  • A leading step to device curative methods against PCP-induced hemotoxicity.

1. Introduction

Chlorophenols are intermediate compounds used in the manufacture of agrochemicals, biocides, dyes, and pharmaceuticals. PCP is a stable, persistent and highly toxic chlorophenol that is primarily used in wood preservation. PCP is commercially used to manufacture pulp and paper, paints, gaur gums and to control molds in petroleum drilling. It is used in defoliant, pre-harvest desiccant, and as an anti-termite agent. PCP is a major component of several fungicides, molluscicides, rodenticides, insecticides, and biocide products [1]. Commercial formulations like Dowicide-5, Penwar 1–5 (EPA Reg. No.7234-7), and Pentacon-10 (EPA Reg. No. 61483-59) contain very high amounts of PCP (85%, 25.6%, and 8.96%, respectively) [2]. Salts of PCP at 12.5% in dry formulations and 2.5–35.7 g/L in liquid (US Patent No. 3846114A) were used to combat the moss “blue stain” in pine timber and eliminate the decaying of wood in the ground by Lentinus lepideus [3].

The global production of PCP in 1981 was evaluated to be 90,000 tons/year. In 2003, 3010 tons of Na-PCP was consumed in China, 60% of which (1806 tons) was used to control schistosomiasis. China still produces 5000 tons/year of PCP as reported in 2010 [4,5]. In 2010, the USA produced 7256 tons/year of PCP and is still manufacturing PCP at 3 facilities located in Alabama and Kansas, USA, and Mexico [4]. India was the leading exporter of Na-PCP and manufactured 1800 tons/year in the states of Maharashtra and West Bengal. In 2016 several industries were registered to manufacture PCP in India, China, Japan, Israel, Canada, South Africa and Netherlands (1 industry), United Kingdom (3 industries), Mexico, Germany, and Switzerland (2 industries), USA (10 industries) [1]. Latin-North-America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa are the global markets of zinc salt (zinc bis(pentachlorophenolate) and sodium salt (sodium pentachlorophenate) of PCP [6,7]. The United States-Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) also lifted the ban on the commercial trade of wood preservatives containing PCP till 2027 [8].

The US-EPA set a maximum contamination level (MCL) for PCP in drinking water as 1 μg/L. The maximum concentration allowed in drinking water (bottled or tap water) is 3.5 nM [9] and 34 nM according to the provisional guidelines of WHO [10]. PCP in μmolar concentrations has been reported in groundwater whilst remarkably higher levels, 0.5–0.7 mM PCP, have been found in industrial effluents and waste [11]. Humans are exposed to PCP through drinking water disinfected with chlorinated oxidants and water resources polluted with PCP [12]. Exposure to PCP also occurs through the indoor air of treated log homes and industries that supply wood, dipped and brushed with PCP [13]. When humans are exposed to PCP through ingestion and inhalation, it damages the kidney [14], intestine [15], cardiovascular system and liver (jaundice) [16]. Workers at lumber mills and wood treatment facilities can inhale about 10.5–154 mg PCP/day and absorb about 35 mg PCP/day via the skin [17]. Blood PCP concentrations were highest in workers directly involved in PCP-utilizing commercial units and also those residing in PCP-treated log homes [18]. In chronically exposed workers, PCP concentrations of 14.0 mg/L in blood and 8.4 mg/L in serum were reported [1].

Chronic human oral exposure to PCP results in acute upper respiratory tract inflammation, bronchitis, hemotoxicity [19], aplastic anemia [20], red cell aplasia [20], Hodgkin's disease, acute leukemia and adenomas in the liver and kidney [16,17]. Chronic PCP toxicity lowers RBC count and hemoglobin level leading to anemia [21]. Clinical and experimental reports document the hematologic, carcinogenic [22], and mutagenic [23] effects of PCP and its chemical contaminants [20]. International Agency for Research and Cancer (IARC) 2019 categorized PCP as a Group 2B possible human carcinogen. Since PCP poisoning has no antidote [24], several (1495) incidents of accidental and intentional (suicidal) PCP poisoning [25], including some fatal cases, have been reported [1,13,26].

Blood and RBC represent a major and important target of PCP that enters the body through any route. PCP is rapidly absorbed by the intestine upon oral intake, with 100% bioavailability, and its blood level peaks in a few hours. PCP is then distributed to other vital organs by circulating blood. In this study, we report that PCP elevates ROS formation that oxidizes lipids, proteins and thiols, compromises antioxidant (AO) defenses, and oxidatively damages the RBC membrane.

2. Materials and methods

Chemicals: PCP (97%, purity) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade from Sigma-Aldrich (USA), Himedia (Mumbai, India) or Sisco Research Laboratory (Mumbai, India).

Animals: Adult, male Wistar rats of about 150 g were bought from the National Institute of Biologicals (CPCSEA Reg. No. 824/GO/RBiBT/S/04/CPCSEA), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, India.

Diet: Rats were given a standard diet purchased from Aashirwad Industries, Chandigarh, India.

2.1. Treatment of animals

Rats were first acclimatized for 7 days on a standard diet and water ad libitum and then divided into five groups (control and 4 PCP treated), with 5 animals in each group. PCP was solubilized in corn oil and orally administered to rats at doses of 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg bw once a day for 5 days. These doses were below 211 mg/kg bw, the reported oral LD50 value of PCP in rats [27]. Rats in the control group received only corn oil by gavages.

Rats were killed 24 h after giving the last dose of PCP, under chloroform anesthesia. Chloroform inhalation is a widely used method of rodent euthanasia. After opening the peritoneum cavity, blood was collected through cardiac puncture in heparin-coated tubes. Blood was spun at 1200 rpm for 12–15 min, the plasma (supernatant) was collected, aliquotted and used immediately or frozen at −80 °C for later analysis. The RBC in pellet were washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.9% sodium chloride in 0.01 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4). Washed RBC were then lysed by adding ten volumes of 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, kept at 4 °C for 2 h, and spun at 3000 rpm for 8–10 min to remove any cell debris. The supernatants (cell lysates) were used at once or kept at −80 °C.

Hemoglobin (Hb) content in RBC lysates was quantified using Drabkin's reagent obtained from Coral Clinical Systems, Goa, India [28]. Concentration of proteins in plasma was quantified as described by Lowry et al. [29]. A standard plot of different concentrations of bovine serum albumin (BSA) was prepared to determine the protein content.

2.2. Hemoglobin oxidation and markers of oxidative stress

The methemoglobin (MetHb) level in RBC lysates was quantified from the absorbance of cell lysates at 560, 576, and 630 nm wavelengths after suitable dilution [30]. MetHb reductase activity in RBC lysates was monitored by following the NADH-dependent reduction of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol at 600 nm [31].

The major non-enzymatic antioxidant (AO) glutathione (GSH), total sulfhydryl (T-SH), carbonyl content, lipid peroxidation (LPO) and H2O2 levels were measured in both RBC lysates and plasma. The GSH concentration was determined in protein-free samples as explained by Beutler [32]. Proteins were precipitated using 1.66% metaphosphoric acid and pelleted by centrifuging samples at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. After adding 5,5′-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) to the supernatants, the absorbance of yellow 5-thionitrobenzoate anion formed was read at 412 nm. Protein carbonyls, a measure of protein oxidation, yield hydrazone adducts with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine which absorb at 360 nm [33]. T-SH groups were quantified by DTNB method as described by Sedlak and Lindsay [34]. LPO was quantified from the reaction of its marker malondialdehyde with thiobarbituric acid to yield a pinkish-red complex that absorbs at 535 nm [35]. H2O2 level was measured by using ferric-xylenol orange coloring reagent, which forms a blue-purple complex in an acidic medium; 100 mM sorbitol acts as a color enhancer in the reaction [36]. Nitric oxide (NO) level was determined using Greiss reagent [0.1% N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, 1% sulphanilamide] as explained by Miranda et al. [37].

2.3. Antioxidant power

Antioxidant power (AO) power was determined in RBC lysates and plasma by the free radical quenching (DDP to DPPH) and metal-reducing (Fe3+, Cu2+, Mo6+) ability of AOs in samples. In the FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) assay, Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+ by sample AOs and then Fe2+ reacts with 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine to yield a blue Fe2+-tripyridyltriazine complex that absorbs at 593 nm [38]. In CUPRAC (cupric reducing antioxidant capacity) method, Cu2+ ions are reduced to Cu+ and Cu+ gives a colored complex with neocuproine [39]. AOs in the samples convert Mo6+ to Mo5+ in phosphomolybdenum assay, and a green-colored phosphate-Mo5+ complex is produced [40]. DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) method was employed to monitor the free radical quenching power of cells. The purple-colored DDP free radical in the aqueous solution accepts a hydrogen atom from AOs in samples which quenches DDP back to pale yellow DPPH. In DPPH assay, hemolysate/plasma (0.02 mL) was mixed with 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH, 7.4 (0.48 mL), in duplicate sets. Then, 0.5 mL of 0.1 mM DPPH (in methanol) was added in one set while 0.5 mL of methanol was added in the other set. After incubating the reaction mixture in the dark for 30 min at room temperature, it was centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 12 min and absorbance of supernatants was noted at 517 nm against a reference containing 0.5 mL sodium phosphate buffer and 0.5 mL DPPH solution [41].

DPPH(%quenching)=ODReferenceODSampleODReference×100

2.4. Antioxidant enzymes

The specific activities of catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and thioredoxin reductase (TR) were determined in plasma and RBC lysates. Catalase activity was measured from the conversion of H2O2 to water and O2 which decreases the sample absorbance at 240 nm [42]. SOD activity was followed by inhibition of the auto-oxidation of pyrogallol [43]. TR activity was monitored using DTNB which is enzymatically cleaved, in the presence of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), to give the yellow 5-thionitrobenzoate anion. The enhanced absorbance at 412 nm was noted [44]. GPx activity was monitored by following the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm upon oxidation of NADPH to oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+) in presence of GSH [45]. Glutathione reductase (GR) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities were determined in RBC lysates only. GR was assayed from the oxidation of NADPH to NADP+ along with enzymatic conversion of GSSG to GSH and the decrease in absorbance was recorded at 340 nm [46]. GST activity was determined using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene and GSH as substrates [47]. Xanthine oxidase (XO) was assayed in plasma by the method of Shintani [48]. The increase in absorbance at 290 nm was noted upon enzymatic cleavage of xanthine to uric acid. A molar extinction coefficient of 1.22 × 104 M−1cm−1 was used to calculate the enzyme activity.

2.5. Membrane-bound enzymes

Acetylthiocholinesterase (AChE), total and Na+K+ATPase were assayed in RBC lysates. AChE hydrolyzes S-acetylthiocholine iodide to thiocholine; the latter dissociates the disulfide bond of DTNB producing yellow 5-thionitrobenzoate anion that absorbs at 412 nm [49]. The activity of total and Na+K+ATPase were determined by measuring the inorganic phosphate (Pi) liberated upon ATP cleavage in the absence and presence of 1 mM ouabain. The Pi yields a blue complex upon reaction with Taussky and Shorr reagent [50].

2.6. Metabolic enzymes

Hexokinase (HK) activity was determined by the method of Bergmeyer et al. [51]. The method involves the reduction of NADP+ to NADPH in a coupled enzymatic reaction catalyzed by HK and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD). Pyruvate kinase (PK) converts phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate along with ATP hydrolysis. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) further converts pyruvate to lactate. This is accompanied by oxidation of NADH to NAD+ leading to a decrease in the absorbance of solution at 340 nm [52]. G6PD was assayed from the reduction of NADP+ to NADPH in presence of glucose 6-phosphate. Resulting increase in absorbance at 340 nm was recorded [53]. In the LDH assay, the decrease in absorbance was followed at 340 nm upon conversion of NADH to NAD+ in the presence of sodium pyruvate [54]. Acid phosphatase (ACP) assay used p-nitrophenyl phosphate as the substrate which generates yellow p-nitrophenol on hydrolysis, causing an increase in sample absorbance at 415 nm [55]. Glyoxalase-I (GLO-I) catalyzes the isomerization of its substrate hemithioacetal to S-lactoylglutathione upon addition of cell lysate containing the enzyme. The change in absorbance at 240 nm was recorded [56].

2.7. Plasma parameters

Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities were measured in plasma using kits from Span Diagnostics (Surat, India). The concentration of end products formed (oxaloacetate in AST and pyruvate in ALT) was determined spectrophotometrically by their reaction with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine under alkaline conditions. The hydrazone adducts formed absorb at 510 nm [57]. Glucose and inorganic phosphate were determined in protein-free plasma samples. Plasma proteins were precipitated by trichloroacetic acid (5%, final concentration), pelleted by spun at 10,000 rpm for 12 min and the protein-free supernatants were used further. Glucose concentration was determined by the o-toluidine method in protein-free supernatants. Samples (0.2 mL) were mixed with 2 mL o-toluidine reagent (1.5 g thiourea dissolved in a solution containing 60 mL o-toluidine and 940 mL glacial acetic acid) and kept at 100 °C for 12 min. Samples were cooled to room temperature and their absorbance at 630 nm was noted. Glucose concentration was calculated using a calibration curve prepared from known concentrations of glucose [58]. The serum level of inorganic phosphate was quantified using the method of Taussky and Shorr [59].

2.8. Liver histopathology

Small pieces of liver were cut and instantly preserved in a 10% formalin solution. Paraffin blocks were prepared after fixing the tissue in wax. Then microscopic sections of 10 μm thickness were cut from paraffin blocks using a microtome. Tissue sections were mounted on glass slides and after hematoxylin and eosin staining the slides were observed at 1000× magnification under a trinocular microscope (Olympus B×40, Japan) [60].

2.9. Statistical analysis

All the experiments were performed using blood from five different rats and dispersion of set is reported as standard deviation and shown as error values. The Bartlett's test was applied to check the homogeneity of variance and a P value of 0.861 (0.754–0.961) was found, which is greater than α (0.05). Statistical significance was determined by One-way ANOVA using the software program Origin Pro 8.0 (USA). Results were considered significant when probability value of α was ≤0.05, analyzed by the Tukey post-hoc test.

3. Results

In this study, we evaluated the toxicity of PCP in rat blood and detailed biochemical analysis were carried out on plasma and isolated RBC, including markers of oxidative stress and membrane integrity, antioxidant status, and enzymes of glucose metabolism.

3.1. Hemoglobin (Hb) oxidation and markers of oxidative stress

PCP treatment increased MetHb formation due to the conversion of Fe2+in Hb to Fe3+; in the highest PCP-treated group (150 mg/kg bw) it was twofold of the control values (Fig. 1). MetHb reductase activity was significantly decreased in cell lysates and in the highest PCP-treated group it was only 40% of the control value (Fig. 2). GSH levels in RBC lysates and plasma were lowered to 43% in a PCP dose-dependent manner (Table 1). Total sulfhydryl content was also decreased to 48% in RBC lysates and 70% in plasma (Table 1). PCP administration increased lipid peroxidation to 2.7 fold of control in RBC lysates and 1.7 fold in plasma (Table 1). A 3 fold increase in protein oxidation was noted in RBC lysates and 2 fold in plasma of rats given the highest PCP dose, as compared to control groups (Table 1). PCP treatment increased the production of H2O2, a non-radical ROS, to 3.5 fold in RBC lysates and 2 fold in plasma. The production of nitric oxide was also increased in blood (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Methemoglobin (MetHb) levels and methemoglobin reductase (MetHbR) activity in RBC lysates. C, control. Data are given as mean ± standard error of 5 different samples. At p ≤ 0.05 results are significantly different (*) from control, analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

PCP-mediated changes in antioxidant power of (A) RBC lysates and (B) plasma, determined by FRAP, CUPRAC, PMG and DPPH assays and reported in % change from control. Data are given as mean ± standard error of 5 different samples. At p ≤ 0.05 results are significantly different (*) from control, analyzed by one-way ANOVA. DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; CUPRAC, cupric reducing antioxidant capacity; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; PMG, phosphomolybdenum green. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Table 1.

PCP-mediated changes in markers of oxidative stress in RBC lysates and plasma of rat blood.

PCP (mg/kg body weight)
Control 25 50 100 150
GSH
RBC 36.56 ± 4.25 25.48 ± 2.14* 20.53 ± 1.84* 16.39 ± 1.91* 12.19 ± 1.53*
Plasma 6.51 ± 0.81 5.48 ± 0.72 4.75 ± 0.64* 3.82 ± 0.39* 3.13 ± 0.46*
Total-SH
RBC 1.25 ± 0.27 1.03 ± 0.21 0.78 ± 0.17* 0.64 ± 0.093* 0.60 ± 0.081*
Plasma 0.31 ± 0.045 0.30 ± 0.041 0.27 ± 0.033 0.23 ± 0.026* 0.22 ± 0.028*
PO
RBC 11.0 ± 1.83 13.66 ± 1.78 17.43 ± 2.11* 25.59 ± 2.92* 33.78 ± 4.05*
Plasma 11.77 ± 1.37 15.35 ± 1.61* 17.63 ± 2.08* 19.57 ± 1.76* 23.58 ± 2.05*
LPO
RBC 0.89 ± 0.112 1.09 ± 0.164 1.36 ± 0.193* 1.85 ± 0.267* 2.43 ± 0.362*
Plasma 1.29 ± 0.164 1.52 ± 0.197 1.73 ± 0.221* 1.87 ± 0.282* 2.18 ± 0.302*
H2O2
RBC 3.61 ± 0.451 4.84 ± 0.537* 5.78 ± 0.711* 8.12 ± 0.930* 12.71 ± 1.64*
Plasma 2.07 ± 0.255 2.23 ± 0.286 2.53 ± 0.302* 3.05 ± 0.381* 3.97 ± 0.518*
NO
RBC 0.43 ± 0.056 0.58 ± 0.073* 0.67 ± 0.082* 0.87 ± 0.095* 1.05 ± 0.167*
Plasma 0.36 ± 0.047 0.54 ± 0.068* 0.65 ± 0.073* 0.76 ± 0.096* 0.94 ± 0.11*

GSH, LPO, PO, H2O2 and NO levels are in nmoles/mg Hb (RBC lysates) or nmoles/mg protein (plasma) and total SH is in μmoles/mg Hb or protein, respectively.

Data are given as mean ± standard error of 5 different samples.

At p ≤ 0.05 results are significantly different (*) from control, analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

GSH, reduced glutathione; SH, sulfhydryl group; PO, protein oxidation; LPO, lipid peroxidation; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; NO, nitric oxide.

3.2. Antioxidant status

Various assays of free radical quenching and metal ion reduction were used to determine the AO capacity/power of plasma and RBC lysates from control and PCP-treated rats. The gross AO capacity of RBC was reduced to half (Fig. 2A) and decreased by 40% in plasma (Fig. 2B) in 150 mg PCP/kg bw treated rats when compared to control animals.

The effect of oral administration of PCP on antioxidant enzymes was determined next. SOD activity was reduced to 43% in RBC and 53% in plasma (Table 2). The catalase activity in RBC was found to be 48% and 43% in RBC and plasma of the highest PCP-treated rats when compared to control animals. GPx activity was inhibited to 40% in RBC and 43% in plasma of PCP-treated rats (Table 2). TR activity was reduced to 56% in RBC and 40% in plasma of PCP-treated rats while GR activity was also compromised to 55% in RBC of PCP-treated rats (Table 2). Oral administration of PCP enhanced the GST activity in RBC lysates by 1.8 fold when compared to control animals (Table 2). XO activity was enhanced 1.5 fold in plasma of PCP-treated rats (Table 2).

Table 2.

PCP-induced alterations in the activities of major antioxidant defense enzymes in rat blood.

PCP (mg/kg body weight)
Control 25 50 100 150
Catalase
RBC 25.55 ± 3.03 20.08 ± 2.64* 17.92 ± 2.36* 14.59 ± 1.96* 12.30 ± 1.58*
Plasma 15.35 ± 2.02 13.07 ± 1.88* 10.31 ± 1.59* 8.63 ± 1.01* 6.67 ± 0.87*
SOD
RBC 50.26 ± 6.69 40.89 ± 5.86* 37.07 ± 4.74* 26.90 ± 3.77* 21.83 ± 3.35*
Plasma 31.90 ± 4.97 28.31 ± 3.80 24.85 ± 3.52* 19.63 ± 3.07* 17.54 ± 2.15*
GPx
RBC 40.04 ± 5.67 31.15 ± 4.56* 24.77 ± 3.24* 24.44 ± 3.01* 23.63 ± 2.85*
Plasma 22.81 ± 3.10 19.09 ± 2.64 15.84 ± 2.07* 14.17 ± 1.82* 13.1 ± 1.68*
TR
RBC 138.02 ± 14.57 122.27 ± 11.63 108.3 ± 13.36* 86.45 ± 10.08* 78.0 ± 9.68*
Plasma 80.46 ± 10.55 70.44 ± 9.34* 52.93 ± 8.67* 45.32 ± 6.94* 32.48 ± 5.05*
GST
RBC 21.07 ± 2.11 23.06 ± 2.66 25.63 ± 3.31 28.9 ± 3.90* 38.74 ± 3.59*
GR
RBC 72.96 ± 10.22 61.58 ± 6.12* 57.96 ± 5.26* 51.70 ± 5.60* 40.92 ± 4.08*
XO
Plasma 1.29 ± 0.183 1.43 ± 0.202 1.53 ± 0.231 1.81 ± 0.217* 2.01 ± 0.269*

Specific activity of SOD is in units/mg Hb (RBC lysates) or units/mg protein (plasma). Catalase, GPx and TR are in nmoles/min/mg Hb or protein, GST and GR in nmoles/min/mg Hb and XO in nmoles/min/mg protein.

Data are given as mean ± standard error of 5 different samples.

At p ≤ 0.05 results are significantly different (*) from control, analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

SOD, superoxide dismutase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; TR, thioredoxin reductase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GR, glutathione reductase; XO, xanthine oxidase.

3.3. Membrane-associated enzymes

The activities of membrane-associated enzymes, ATPases, and AChE, were determined to check RBC membrane integrity. The activities of both enzymes were inhibited in PCP-treated rats. The activities of total ATPase and Na+K+ATPase were lowered to 62% and 65% in RBC of PCP-treated rats (Fig. 3). AChE activity was also reduced to 38% in RBC of PCP-treated rats in comparison to control rats (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

PCP-mediated alterations in the activities of membrane-bound enzymes, total ATPase and Na+K+ATPase. C, control. Data are given as mean ± standard error of 5 different samples. At p ≤ 0.05 results are significantly different (*) from control, analyzed by one-way ANOVA. ATPase, adenosine triphosphatase.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

PCP-mediated alterations in the activity of membrane-bound enzyme AChE. C, control. Data are given as mean ± standard error of 5 different samples. At p ≤ 0.05 results are significantly different (*) from control, analyzed by one-way ANOVA. AChE, acetylcholinesterase.

3.4. Metabolic enzymes

Specific activities of all metabolic enzymes were altered in PCP-treated rats. PCP administration to rats inhibited HK, PK, G6PD and ACP activities to 64%, 56%, 53% and 59% of control rats in a PCP dose-dependent manner, respectively (Table 3). LDH and GLO-1 activities in RBC of PCP-treated rats were increased 2 and 3 fold, respectively, when compared to control animals (Table 3).

Table 3.

PCP-induced changes in activities of metabolic enzymes in RBC lysates.

PCP (mg/kg body weight)
Control 25 50 100 150
HK 76.6 ± 9.02 64.72 ± 8.23 58.72 ± 7.41* 53.63 ± 6.61* 49.33 ± 5.84*
PK 51.55 ± 6.75 45.65 ± 6.41 38.0 ± 5.13* 32.02 ± 5.01* 29.14 ± 3.36*
LDH 16.81 ± 2.81 19.85 ± 2.03 22.0 ± 2.75* 30.08 ± 3.91* 36.63 ± 5.11*
G6PD 116.4 ± 15.10 106.9 ± 12.62 88.6 ± 10.61* 73.61 ± 9.18* 62.36 ± 8.03*
ACP 25.39 ± 3.03 23.24 ± 2.81 20.47 ± 2.52* 17.65 ± 2.14* 14.72 ± 1.28*
GLO-1 9.94 ± 1.71 14.60 ± 2.01* 17.58 ± 2.35* 21.32 ± 2.58* 28.96 ± 3.59*

Specific activity of all enzymes is in nmoles/min/mg Hb.

Data are given as mean ± standard error of 5 different samples.

At p ≤ 0.05 results are significantly different (*) from control, analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

HK, hexokinase; PK, pyruvate kinase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; G6PD, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, ACP, acid phosphatase; GLO-1, glyoxalase-1.

3.5. Plasma markers of oxidative stress

A significant change in enzymatic and non-enzymatic parameters in plasma of PCP-treated rats was found. The plasma glucose level was increased from 100 mg/dl to 177 mg/dl in treated rats (Fig. 5A). The Pi level in plasma was decreased to 70% in PCP-treated rats when compared to control rats (Fig. 5A). A 2.1 fold increase in AST and 4.5 fold increase in ALT activities was seen in plasma relative to control group (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

PCP-mediated changes in (A) glucose and inorganic phosphate levels (B) AST and ALT levels, in plasma of rat blood. C, control. Data are given as mean ± standard error of 5 different samples. At p ≤ 0.05 results are significantly different (*) from control, analyzed by one-way ANOVA. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

3.6. Histopathology of liver

Histopathological images from the liver of untreated control rats showed discrete morphology of hepatocytes; the sinusoids are not congested and hepatocytes are devoid of vesicles and vacuoles (Fig. 6a). The PCP-treated groups show gradual changes in terms of blurring of boundaries, and the apparent progressive clumping/fusion of hepatocytes, as compared to the control. The intracytoplasmic vesicles are not seen in control and 25 mg/kg bw treated groups (Fig. 6a and b). In 100 mg/kg bw treated group, they are small and infrequent (Fig. 6c) while in 150 mg/kg bw treated group the vesicles are numerous, present in clusters and can be seen to affect majority of the cells in the field (Fig. 6d).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Representative photomicrographs of rat liver from (a) untreated control group, and (b, c and d) treated with PCP at 25, 100 and 150 mg/kg bw, respectively. Green arrows indicate hepatocytes, blue arrows hepatic sinusoids, and black arrows intracytoplasmic vesicles wherever present in the groups. Initial magnification 1000X. H & E stain. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

4. Discussion

PCP is an inexpensive biocidal agent that has broad applications in wood preservation, industries, and agriculture. PCP concentration of 190 ppm (190 mg/L) is reported in industrial effluents and wastewater resources [1,11]. PCP easily crosses the skin, respiratory tract and gets absorbed in the intestine due to its high lipophilicity [61]. It is then distributed to various vital organs and in the body fluids [62,63]. PCP toxicity likely involves enhanced production of ROS which leads to a condition of oxidative stress [64].

Hb is an abundantly (≥95% of total proteins) found iron-containing oxygen-transport metalloprotein in the RBC of almost all vertebrates. Due to its abundance, free radicals/ROS mainly target Hb in these cells and oxidize the prosthetic group ferroheme to ferriheme thereby converting Hb to MetHb. The oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ makes Hb inactive for transporting oxygen to tissues [65]. The NADH-dependent enzyme MetHb reductase catalyzes the conversion of MetHb back to Hb. Inhibition of MetHb reductase causes an abnormal increase of MetHb which has high O2 binding affinity but does not unload oxygen in the tissues. MetHb is, therefore, inactive as an O2 transporter. Increased MetHb levels can be observed during toxic insult, which compromises the RBC's reducing capacity and results in functional anemia. The electron released upon Hb oxidation to MetHb can be taken up by O2 to generate superoxide radicals (O2•-) which are then converted to H2O2. Free iron reacts with H2O2 and initiates the Fenton reaction to form the highly damaging hydroxyl radicals. PCP (40 mg/kg bw) conjugates with cysteine residues of hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin to form semiquinone adducts which lower the oxygen-carrying ability of RBC and also disturb the osmotic balance in rat blood [65]. Chronic PCP toxicity lowers RBC count and hemoglobin level leading to anemia [21].

Several parameters of oxidative stress, including oxidation of proteins, lipids, and thiols, were determined to see if PCP induces oxidative stress in blood. GSH and GSH-dependent enzymes are essentially required for many reductive reactions in the body and regulate the concentration of free radicals/ROS. PCP interacts with GSH with the sequential replacement of chlorine molecules and also oxidizes its sulfhydryl group. TCBQ (tetrachlorobenzoquinone) can deplete up to four GSH molecules per TCBQ by interacting with multiple thiols. PCP metabolite TCHQ (tetrachlorohydroquinone) and also forms conjugates with GSH through non-enzymatic reactions that occur via direct chemical interaction [64]. GSH depletion could diminish the protective ability of cells against ROS, which interact with membrane proteins and lipids to alter their structure and properties [66]. LPO is the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids present in membranes phospholipids and some of its products like malondialdehyde are themselves highly reactive and oxidize other cellular components and the extracellular matrix. Increased lipid peroxidation results in loss of membrane integrity, fluidity, and permeability and also alters activity of bound enzymes [67,68]. Under oxidative stress condition the endogenous hydroperoxides produced upon LPO may accelerate PCP metabolism to increase its toxicity and carcinogenicity [69]. Direct oxidation of side chain amino acids in polypeptide chains or adducts formed with LPO products generate carbonyl groups in proteins. Protein carbonylation irreversibly modifies the proteins to non-functional form and is used as a biomarker of protein oxidation [70]. Auto-oxidation and/or enzymatic oxidation of PCP in the liver of rats produces TCHQ and TCBQ followed by redox cycling that generates enormous amounts of H2O2 and hydroxyl radicals [71]. Oral administration of PCP increased H2O2 and NO production, NO can further react with O2•- to produce peroxynitrite [72]. This enhanced level of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) likely results in oxidation of cellular components.

Mammalian cells are well equipped with non-enzymatic AOs that work by interrupting free radical chain reactions. Non-enzymatic AOs protect cells from oxidative damage by donating an electron or hydrogen atom to reduce metal ions and quench free radicals, respectively. The antioxidant power was greatly reduced in treated rats, which could be due to reduced levels of non-enzymatic AOs like GSH.

AO enzymes are responsible for the metabolism and/or stabilization of ROS and for maintaining the redox equilibrium in cells. AO enzymes protect aerobic organisms from oxidative damage and related disorders. SOD dismutates superoxide radicals into O2 and non-radical H2O2 while catalase further degrades this H2O2 to water and O2. Inhibition of SOD, catalase and GPx leads to increased levels of H2O2, hydroxyl radicals, peroxides and superoxides in blood [73,74]. GPx also decomposes H2O2 by using GSH as a reducing equivalent. The inhibition of GPx is likely due to the low concentration of GSH, which is used as a substrate in the breakdown of H2O2 to water [75]. TR maintains disulfide bonds of intracellular proteins in a reduced state while GR reproduces GSH from GSSG utilizing NADPH as a reducing compound. GR and TR work synergistically to combat oxidant attacks. PCP inhibited GR and TR activity dose-dependently. Thus, the activities of all major AO enzymes were significantly lowered in plasma and RBC of PCP-treated rats, when compared to control. ROS directly inhibit the active site of these enzymes or can react with transition metals in the prosthetic groups. This inhibition of AO enzymes compromises the ability of cells to protect themselves from oxidants because of lowered ROS scavenging capacity and consequent increase in ROS. The reduction in the level of GSH, a major non-enzymatic AO, will lead to enhanced formation of ROS and induction of oxidative stress condition. This will alter the functional and structural status of the cell and its membrane.

GST catalyzes the conjugation of GSH to xenobiotic substrates for detoxification. Increased GST could represent an adaptive response of the cell to combat enhanced ROS condition [74]. XO oxidizes hypoxanthine to xanthine and further into uric acid in the purine salvage pathways. XO is also a pro-oxidant enzyme involved in ROS generation. Increased XO activity was seen in plasma of PCP-treated rats. This, coupled with the inhibition of AO enzymes, will exacerbate the oxidative stress condition. Increased activity of plasma XO is associated with several pathologies [76]. PCP is known to cause depletion of AO enzymes which causes increased ROS and RNS levels in liver, kidneys, brain and RBC [77,78]. PCP-mediated ROS causes neuronal damage to hippocampus and degenerates retinal cells [79].

Oxidative damage modifies membrane lipids and proteins, alters membrane fluidity which affects the activities of bound enzymes. ATPases are integral membrane proteins that use energy from ATP hydrolysis to maintain essential trans-membrane action potential in virtually all living cells. They also maintain cellular integrity and function. PCP-induced ROS could have oxidatively modified the essential thiol groups of ATPases, resulting in decreased enzyme activity. PCP uncouples the oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria isolated from rat liver, kidney and brain at low concentration (10 μM), and inhibits the ATPases at high concentrations (100 μM). PCP enhances the release of inorganic phosphate from ATP, which leads to ATP depletion [18,61]. PCP also restricted the uptake of Pi associated with the oxidation of α-ketoglutarate by rat liver mitochondria [80]. A significant amount of PCP binds to the cell membrane that induces the formation of both H2O2 and superoxide anion at a very high rate leading to oxidative damage. AChE is a significant marker of RBC membrane damage and its inhibition by PCP indicates the generation of oxidative stress [81].

Oxidative stress provokes metabolic failure which compromises cell viability by inhibiting the enzymes of glycolytic pathway and lowering ATP level [82]. PCP treatment significantly and dose-dependently inhibited the key enzymes involved in energy production and adversely affected cellular metabolism in rats. HK is the first enzyme of glucose metabolism that phosphorylates glucose to glucose 6-phosphatase. Oxidative stress condition leads to inactivation of HK which deprives cells of ATP. PK dephosphorylates phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate, yielding one molecule of ATP in the final step of glycolysis. ROS directly target the cysteine residue in PK active site [83]; hence the enzyme activity was reduced in PCP-treated rats.

G6PD catalyzes the first committed and rate-limiting step of phosphogluconate pathway by recycling the NADP+ to NADPH, a major cellular reductant. AO enzymes like TR and GR depend on NADPH which they use as substrate to catalyze their reactions and reduce ROS-mediated oxidative damage. Oral administration of PCP inhibited G6PD activity in RBC in PCP dose-dependent manner. This could be due to the inhibition of HK, whose product glucose 6-phosphate serves as a substrate for G6PD. Low concentration of glucose 6-phosphate will decrease G6PD activity and also the rate of hexose monophosphate shunt. Lowered G6PD activity will further reduce the NADPH level which will compromise the cellular reducing power leading to acute hemolytic anemia [84]. LDH reversibly converts lactate to pyruvate along with the reduction of NAD⁺ to NADH. Oxidative damage to the cellular membrane detaches the bound LDH and increases its activity. ACP hydrolyses organic phosphates in RBC and its activity was decreased in PCP dose-dependent manner.GLO-1 carries out the detoxification of reactive ketoaldehyde methylglyoxal and other reactive aldehydes that are produced as a normal part of metabolism. Increased level of endogenous methylglyoxal generates reactive carbonyl species (RCS) leading to toxicity and cellular damage. The level of RCS like methylglyoxal increases under oxidative stress condition and enhanced GLO-1 activity may be an adaptive response to quench these species [85].

Glucose is the primary and instant source of energy in human body that acts as starting substrate for many vital processes such as glycolysis, hexose-monophosphate shunt, etc. The increased glucose level in plasma from 100 mg/dl to 177 mg/dl could be due to inhibition, and less glucose degradation, of glycolysis in PCP-treated rats [86]. Inactivation of ATPases leads to reduced glucose co-transport within cells, this may also result in increased plasma glucose concentration. Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is required for normal cellular function, mineralization of bones, nerve function and muscle contraction. Lower Pi level in PCP-treated rats compared to control, will affect the electrolyte values and normal functions of the cell.

AST is a key enzyme in amino acid metabolism as it reversibly transfers an α-amino group between aspartate and glutamate. AST is a hepatic enzyme that is released in blood upon liver damage [66]. ALT is an important intermediate in cellular energy production that transfers an amino group from l-alanine to α-ketoglutarate. High ALT level in blood indicates liver disease/damage [17,73]. Increased ALT activity is due to damage to hepatic structure. The significant increase in AST and ALT levels in blood is a strong indicator of PCP-induced liver dysfunction or damage [66].

The significant increase in the activities of serum AST and ALT in PCP-treated rats suggested liver damage. This was confirmed by histopathological analysis of liver from control and PCP-treated rats. The hepatocytes in the liver of untreated control rats had normal structure, unclogged sinusoids and hepatocytes were lacking vacuoles [87]. The PCP-treated groups showed gradual changes in terms of distorted boundaries of hepatocytes, congestion of sinusoids and continuous increase in the number and size of intracellular vesicles and vacuoles. Fleische et al. [88] did a microscopic examination of the liver of PCP-treated rats and reported sinusoidal dilatation and an increase in extrahepatocytic space. Numerous intracytoplasmic vesicles, present in clusters can be seen to affect majority of the cells in the liver of rats treated with 150 mg PCP/kg bw. Darkening of nuclei in the PCP-treated groups can be related to the findings of Fleische et al. [88] that PCP enhanced the volume density and decreased the numerical density of nuclei in hepatocytes. This may be due to increased heterochromatin to euchromatin relation by PCP. Umemura et al. [89] reported an increase in cell proliferation and 8-oxodG level in mice liver, suggesting that PCP exposure increases ROS level that causes hepatic damage.

The strength of the study is that it is based on the evaluation of PCP hemotoxicity in rats, blood and its components are the primary markers of toxicity caused by xenobiotics entering the body. The assessment of the toxic effects of xenobiotics is more accurate in an animal model because it involves the internal environment of a living being, the findings of in vivo studies are considered more reliable or relevant. This study may also relate to hemotoxicity caused by other organochlorines or polychlorophenols. The limitation of this study is that the results should be correlated by analyzing the blood of persons who are occupationally exposed to PCP.

In summary, oral administration of PCP enhances MetHb levels and increases the oxidation of thiols, proteins and lipids in rat blood due to generation of oxidative stress in the blood. It lowers the ability of cells to quench free radicals and reduces metal ions and inhibits the primary AO enzymes. Membrane damage is indicated by inhibition of bound enzymes while enzymes and pathways of glucose catabolism are also inhibited. PCP also causes hepatic damage as shown by increase in the level of its markers in plasma and histopathological analysis of liver. These results will help in elucidating the biochemical mode of toxic action of PCP so that appropriate methods can be designed to reduce its harmful effects (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Schematic depiction of PCP-induced oxidative stress and hemotoxicity in rat blood. Oral administration of PCP to rats causes increased ROS and RNS formation, including H2O2, NO and hydroxyl radicals. This increase in reactive species causes oxidation of membrane lipids and proteins, oxidative modification of cellular proteins resulting in membrane damage and enzyme inactivation. Oxidative damage to membrane further increases the PCP influx in cells. This leads to generation of free radicals and ROS, reduces the cellular AOs and impairs the AO defense system. The diminished AO power results in a decreased ability of RBC to neutralize free radicals and ROS. This will lead to increased oxidative damage of cellular components, reduced lifespan of RBC and anemia.

AO, antioxidant; PCP, pentachlorophenol; RBC, red blood cells; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RNS, reactive nitrogen species. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

5. Summary

This study provides strong evidence of hemotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by PCP in blood of rats. PCP administration decreases AO activities, AO power, increases H2O2 and NO levels and oxidizes membrane proteins and lipids. It also leads to inhibition of enzymes in glucose metabolism. Thus, PCP significantly and dose-dependently induces oxidative damage in rat blood. PCP treatment also increases plasma AST and ALT levels and causes histological abrasions in liver indicative of liver damage.

No previous study has reported PCP-induced hemotoxicity in rats. PCP causes oxidative damage to RBC and plasma leading to anemia and other cardiovascular diseases. By understanding the molecular mode of PCP toxicity, we can devise methods to alleviate the harmful effects of PCP and other chlorophenols like using antioxidants as protective agents.

Animal ethical clearance

This study was approved by the IAEC of the Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, AMU and CPCSEA (Registration No. 714/GO/Re/S/02/CPCSEA).

Author contribution statement

Nikhil Maheshwari: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Aijaz Ahmed Khan: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data.

Riaz Mahmood: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Samreen Salam: Conceived and designed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Funding statement

Nikhil Maheshwari was supported by Senior Research Fellowship from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, {09/112 (0624)2K19-EMR-I}.

Data availability statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Nikhil Maheshwari reports was provided by Aligarh Muslim University. Nikhil Maheshwari reports a relationship with Aligarh Muslim University that includes: employment. All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Financial aid to the Department of Biochemistry from the UGC-SAP-DRS-III and DBT-BUILDER programs is gratefully acknowledged.

Contributor Information

Nikhil Maheshwari, Email: nikhil.5795@gmail.com.

Aijaz Ahmed Khan, Email: aijazahmedkhan7@live.com.

Riaz Mahmood, Email: riazmahmood2002@yahoo.co.in.

Samreen Salam, Email: samreenabdulsalam15@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.IARC . International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2019. Pentachlorophenol and Some Related Compounds. Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans; pp. 33–123. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Becker J., Hopkins S., Jones A., Kiely T. U.S. EPA. Washington D.C; 2008. A Qualitative Economic Impact Assessment of Alternatives to Pentachlorophenol as a Wood Preservative. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Unger A., Schniewind A.P., Unger W. Conservation of wood artifacts: a handbook. Springer science & business media. Science. 2013:1–578. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.United Nations . 2010. Exploration of management options por pentachlorophenol (PCP). Paper for the 8th meeting of the UNECE CLRTAP Task Force on Persistent Organic Pollutants; pp. 18–20. Montreal. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun Y., Liu Z., Xia W., et al. Urinary pentachlorophenol in general population of central China: reproducibility, predictors, and associations with oxidative stress biomarkers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24802-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.NCBIa (National Center for Biotechnology Information) PubChem compound summary for CID 23663539, sodium pentachlorophenate. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Sodium-pentachlorophenate Retrieved August 2 (2022) from.
  • 7.NCBIb (National Center for Biotechnology Information) PubChem compound summary for CID 6451478, zinc bis(pentachlorophenolate) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Zinc-bis_pentachlorophenolate Retrieved August 2 (2022) from.
  • 8.Erickson B.E. US EPA axes pentachlorophenol wood preservative. C&EN. 2022;100(6):12. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cen-10006-polcon2 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Table E.P.A. United States Environmental Protection Agency; Washington (DC), USA: 2016. Of Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. Ground Water and Drinking Water.https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/table-regulated-drinking-water-contaminants Available from: [Google Scholar]
  • 10.WHO. Pentachlorophenol in Drinking-Water: Background Document for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2003. https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/pentachlorophenol.pdf WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/62. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lampi P., Vartiainen T., Tuomisto J., et al. Population exposure to chlorophenols, dibenzo-pdioxins and dibenzofurans after a prolonged ground water pollution by chlorophenols. Chemosphere. 1990;20(6):625–634. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Michałowicz J., Wluka A., Cyrkler M., et al. Phenol and chlorinated phenols exhibit different apoptotic potential in human red blood cells (in vitro study) Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018;61:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2018.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wispriyono B., Matsuoka M., Igisu H. Effects of pentachlorophenol and tetrachlorohydroquinone on mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in Jurkat T cells. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002;110(2):139–143. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maheshwari N., Khan A.A., Ali A., Mahmood R. Pentachlorophenol causes redox imbalance, inhibition of brush border membrane and metabolic enzymes, DNA damage and histological alterations in rat kidney. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2023 doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maheshwari N., Khan A.A., Ali A., Mahmood R. Oral administration of pentachlorophenol impairs antioxidant system, inhibits enzymes of brush border membrane, causes DNA damage and histological changes in rat intestine. Toxicol. Res. 2022;11(4):616–627. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfac035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McConnell E.E., Huff J.E., Hejtmancik M., Peters A.C., Persing R. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of two grades of pentachlorophenol in B6C3F1 mice. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 1991;17(3):519–532. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(91)90202-F. PMID:1794655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.ATSDR. Agency . US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; Atlanta, GA: 2001. For Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Pentachlorophenol; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Michalowicz J., Majsterek I. Chlorophenols, chlorocatechols and chloroguaiacols induce DNA base oxidation in human lymphocytes (in vitro) Toxicology. 2010;268(3):171–175. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maheshwari N., Khan F.H., Mahmood R. Pentachlorophenol-induced cytotoxicity in human erythrocytes: enhanced generation of ROS and RNS, lowered antioxidant power, inhibition of glucose metabolism, and morphological changes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019;26(13):12985–13001. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04736-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Roberts H.J. Aplastic anemia and red cell aplasia due to pentachlorophenol. South. Med. J. 1983;76(1):45–48. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198301000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.ATSDR. U.S. Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry . 1992. Toxicological Profile for Pentachlorophenol. Draft Report. Atlanta, GA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reigner B.G., Bois F.Y., Tozer T.N. Pentachlorophenol carcinogenicity: extrapolation of risk from mice to humans. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1993;12(3):215–225. doi: 10.1177/096032719301200304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nishimura N., Oshima H. Mutagenicity of pentachlorophenol, dinitro-o-cresol and their related compounds. Sangyo Igaku. 1983;25(6):510–511. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.25.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Proudfoot A.T. Pentachlorophenol poisoning. Toxicol. Rev. 2003;22(1):3–11. doi: 10.2165/00139709-200322010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Demers P.A., Davies H.W., Friesen M.C., Hertzman C., Ostry A., Hershler R., et al. Cancer and occupational exposure to pentachlorophenol and tetrachlorophenol (Canada) Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17(6):749–758. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martin T.J., Maise J.Q., Gabure S., et al. Exposures to the environmental contaminants pentachlorophenol and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane increase production of the proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1b, in human immune cells. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2019;39(8):1132–1142. doi: 10.1002/jat.3798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gasiewicz T.A. Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Hayes WJ Jr. And Laws ER Jr. Academic Press; New York, NY: 1991. Nitro compounds and related phenolic pesticides; pp. 6–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Drabkin D.L., Austin J.H. Spectrophotometric studies II. Preparation from washed blood cells; nitric oxide and sulf-hemoglobin. J. Biol. Chem. 1935;112:51–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., et al. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951;193:265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Benesch R.E., Benesch R., Yung S. Equations for the spectrophotometric analysis of hemoglobin mixtures. Anal. Biochem. 1973;55:245–248. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90309-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kuma F., Ishizawa S., Hirayama K., Nakajima H. Studies on methemoglobin reductase. I. Comparative studies of diaphorases from normal and methemoglobinemic erythrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1972;247:550–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Beutler E. third ed. Grune and Stratton; New York: 1984. Red Cell Metabolism: a Manual of Biochemical Methods. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Levine R.L., Garland D., Oliver C.N., et al. Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:464–478. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)86141-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sedlak J., Lindsay R.H. Estimation of total, protein bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman's reagent. Anal. Biochem. 1968;25:192–205. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(68)90092-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Buege J.A., Aust S.D. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol. 1978;52:302–310. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(78)52032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gay C., Gebicki J.M. A critical evaluation of the effect of sorbitol on the ferric-xylenol orange hydroperoxide assay. Anal. Biochem. 2000;284:217–220. doi: 10.1006/abio.2000.4696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Miranda K.M., Espey M.G., Wink D.A. A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 2001;5:62–71. doi: 10.1006/niox.2000.0319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Benzie I.F.F., Strain J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996;239:70–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cekic S.D., Kara N., Tutem E., Apak R. Protein-incorporated serum total antioxidant capacity measurement by a modified CUPRAC (cupric reducing antioxidant capacity) method. Anal. Lett. 2012;45:754–763. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Prieto P., Pinda M., Aguilar M. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal. Biochem. 1999;269:337–347. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.4019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mishra K., Ojha H., Chaudhury N.K. Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH assay: a critical review and results. Food Chem. 2012;130:1036–1043. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121–126. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marklund S., Marklund G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1974;47:469–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tamura T., Stadtman T.C. A new selenoprotein from human lung adenocarcinoma cells: purification, properties, and thioredoxin reductase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:1006–1011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Flohe L., Gunzler W.A. Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:114–121. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Carlberg I., Mannervik B. Glutathione reductase. Methods Enzymol. 1985;113:484–490. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(85)13062-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Habig W.H., Pabst M.J., Jokoby W.B., S-transferases Glutathione. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974;249:130–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shintani H. Determination of xanthine oxidase. Pharm. Anal. Acta. 2013;S7 doi: 10.4172/2153-2435.S7-004. 004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ellman G.L., Countney D.K., Andres V.J., Feather-Stone R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961;7:88–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bonting S.L., Simon K.A., Hawkins N.M. Studies on sodium-potassium-activated adenosine triphosphatase: I. Quantitative distribution in several tissues of the cat. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1961;95:416–423. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(61)90170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.H.U. Bergmeyer, M. Grassl, H.E. Walter, In: Bergmeyer HU, ed. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Vol. II, third ed. Deerfield Beach, FL: Verlag Chemie (19830 222-223.
  • 52.Bergmeyer H.U., Gawehn K., Grassl M. In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. second ed. Bergmeyer H.U., editor. Academic Pres Inc.; New York (NY): 1974. Pyruvate kinase; pp. 509–510. vol. I. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shonk C.C., Boxer G.E. Enzyme patterns in human tissues I. Methods for the determination of glycolytic enzymes. Cancer Res. 1964;24:709–721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Khundmiri S.J., Asghar M., Khan F., Salim S., Yusufi A.N. Effect of ischemia and reperfusion on enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in rat kidney. J. Nephrol. 2004;17:377–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mohrenweiser H.W., Novotny J.E. ACP1 GUA-1-a low-activity variant of human erythrocyte acid phosphatase: association with increased glutathione reductase activity. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1982;34:425–433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Arai M., Kikuchi N., Itokawat M., Rabbani N., Thornalley P.J. Measurement of glyoxalase activities. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014;42:491–494. doi: 10.1042/BST20140010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Reitman S., Frankel S. A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamicoxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1957;28:56–63. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/28.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dubowski K.M. An o-toluidine method for body-fluid glucose determination. Clin. Chem. 2008;54:1919–1920. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.104844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Taussky H.H., Shorr E. A microcolorimetric method for the determination of inorganic phosphorus. J. Biol. Chem. 1953;202:675–685. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Slaoui M., Fiette L. Histopathology procedures: from tissue sampling to histopathological evaluation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011;691:69–82. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-849-2_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jorens P.G., Schepens P.J. Human pentachlorophenol poisoning. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1993;12(6):479–495. doi: 10.1177/096032719301200605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chhabra R.S., Maronpot R.M., Bucher J.R., et al. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of pentachlorophenol in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 1999;48(1):14–20. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/48.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Carrizo D., Grimalt J.O., et al. Pentachlorobenzene, hexachlorobenzene and pentachlorophenol in children's serum from industrial and rural populations after restricted use. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008;71(1):260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen H.M., Lee Y.H., Wang Y.J. ROS-triggered signaling pathways involved in the cytotoxicity and tumor promotion effects of pentachlorophenol and tetrachlorohydroquinone. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2015;28(3):339–350. doi: 10.1021/tx500487w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Waidyanatha S., Lin P.H., Rappaport S.M. Characterization of chlorinated adducts of hemoglobin and albumin following administration of pentachlorophenol to rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1996;9(3):647–653. doi: 10.1021/tx950172n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang Y.J., Lee C.C., Chang W.C., et al. Oxidative stress and liver toxicity in rats and human hepatoma cell line induced by pentachlorophenol and its major metabolite tetrachlorohydroquinone. Toxicol. Lett. 2001;122(2):157–169. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00361-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tsai C.H., Lin P.H., Waidyanatha S., Rappaport S.M. Characterization of metabolic activation of pentachlorophenol to quinones and semiquinones in rodent liver. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2001;134(1):55–71. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(00)00318-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Van Ommen B., Adang A., Muller F., Van Bladeren P.J. The microsomal metabolism of pentachlorophenol and its covalent binding to protein and DNA. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1989;60:1–11. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(86)90013-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhu B.Z., Kitrossky N., Chevion M. Evidence for production of hydroxyl radicals by pentachlorophenol metabolites and hydrogen peroxide: a metal-independent organic Fenton reaction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000;270(3):942–946. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jiang P., Wang J., Zhang J., Dai J. Effects of pentachlorophenol on the detoxification system in white-rumped munia (Lonchura striata) J. Environ. Sci. 2016;44:224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Umemura T., Kuroiwa Y., Kitamura Y., et al. A crucial role of Nrf2 in in vivo defense against oxidative damage by an environmental pollutant, pentachlorophenol. Toxicol. Sci. 2006;90(1):111–119. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bekhouche K., Ozen T., Boussaha S., Demirtas I., et al. Hepatoprotective effects of the n-butanol extract from Perralderia coronopifolia Coss. against PCP-induced toxicity in Wistar albino rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019;26(30):31215–31224. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06231-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bebe F.N., Panemangalore M. Exposure to low doses of endosulfan and chlorpyrifos modifies endogenous antioxidants in tissues of rats. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B. 2003;38:349–363. doi: 10.1081/PFC-120019901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Aziz N., Jamil R.T. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Biochemistry, Xanthine Oxidase.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545245/ - Available from:) Jan. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kan H.F., Zhao F.Z., Zhang X.X., Ren H.Q., Gao S.X. Correlations of gut microbial community shift with hepatic damage and growth inhibition of Carassius auratus induced by pentachlorophenol exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49:11894–11902. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cecarini V., Gee J., Fioretti E., et al. Protein oxidation and cellular homeostasis: emphasis on metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1773:93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Scimone C., Donato L., Marino S., Alafaci C., D'Angelo R., Sidoti A. Vis-a-vis: a focus on genetic features of cerebral cavernous malformations and brain arteriovenous malformations pathogenesis. Neurol. Sci. 2019;40(2):243–251. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3674-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Scimone C., Donato L., Alafaci C., Granata F., Rinaldi C., Longo M., D'Angelo R., Sidoti A. High-throughput sequencing to detect novel likely gene-disrupting variants in pathogenesis of sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations. Front. Genet. 2020;28:11–146. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Donato L., Scimone C., Alibrandi S., Scalinci S.Z., Rinaldi C., D'Angelo R., Sidoti A. Epitranscriptome analysis of oxidative stressed retinal epithelial cells depicted a possible RNA editing landscape of retinal degeneration. Antioxidants. 2022;11(10) doi: 10.3390/antiox11101967. 1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Fraser D.L., Stander B.A., Steenkamp V. Cytotoxic activity of pentachlorophenol and its active metabolites in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Toxicol. Vitro. 2019;58:118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Anastasiou D., Poulogiannis G., Asara J.M., et al. Inhibition of pyruvate kinase M2 by reactive oxygen species contributes to cellular antioxidant responses. Science. 2011;334:1278–1283. doi: 10.1126/science.1211485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Luzzatto L., Seneca E. G6PD deficiency: a classic example of pharmacogenetics with on-going clinical implications. Br. J. Haematol. 2014;164:469–480. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Nishimura H., Nishimura N., Oshima H. Experimental studies on the toxicity of pentachlorophenol. J. Aichi. Med. Univ. Assoc. 1980;8:203–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Villena F., Montoya G., Klaasen R., Fleckenstein R., Suwalsky M. Morphological changes on nerves and histopathological effects on liver and kidney of rats by pentachlorophenol (PCP) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Comp. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1992;101(3):353–363. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(92)90287-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rinaldi C., Bramanti P., Fama A., Scimone C., Donato L., Antognelli C., Alafaci C., Tomasello F., D'Angelo R., Sidoti A. Glyoxalase I A111E, paraoxonase 1 Q192R and L55M polymorphisms in Italian patients with sporadic cerebral cavernous malformations: a pilot study. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2015;29(2):493–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Colosio C., Maroni M., Barcellini W., Meroni P., et al. Toxicological and immune findings in workers exposed to pentachlorophenol (PCP) Arch. Environ. Health. 1993;48(2):81–88. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1993.9938399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kimbrough R.D., Linder R.E. The effect of technical and purified pentachlorophenol on the rat liver. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1978;46(1):151–162. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(78)90146-1. PMID: 725940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Fleischer M., Meiss R., Robenek H., Themann H., Eckard R. Ultrastructural morphometric investigations on rat liver of young and adult rats after treatment with technical pentachlorophenol (PCP) Arch. Toxicol. 1980;44(4):243–257. doi: 10.1007/BF00278032. PMID: 7396711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Umemura T., Kai S., Hasegawa R., Sai K., Kurokawa Y., Williams G.M. Pentachlorophenol (PCP) produces liver oxidative stress and promotes but does not initiate hepatocarcinogenesis in B6C3F1 mice. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20(6):1115–1120. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.6.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES