Skip to main content
World Neurosurgery: X logoLink to World Neurosurgery: X
. 2023 May 11;19:100217. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100217

Co-occurrence of dural arteriovenous fistula and meningioma: A rare case and systematic review

Abhishek S Bhutada a,b, Srijan Adhikari b,, Joshua Cuoco b, Alexander In a,b, John Entwistle b, Mark R Witcher b
PMCID: PMC10206830  PMID: 37235061

Abstract

Background

The coexistence of meningioma and dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) is a rare, but highly complex condition. Various pathophysiological mechanisms underlie intracranial meningiomas with continuous or distant dAVFs. We describe a case of coexisting meningioma and dAVF with a systematic review of the literature.

Result

Including the present case, there are 21 reported cases of coexisting intracranial dAVF and meningioma. The patients’ ages ranged from 23 to 76 years, with a mean age of 61 years. The most common presenting symptom was headache. The dAVFs were commonly located at the transverse-sigmoid sinus (43%) and superior sagittal sinus (24%). The most common meningioma locations were the tentorium and parietal convexity. In 76% of the cases, the meningioma occluded the sinus. The most common dAVF treatment was transcatheter arterial embolization, followed by tumor resection (52%). Among the 20 cases with available outcome data, 90% reported favorable outcomes.

Conclusion

This report highlights some of the features of coexisting dAVF and meningioma and presents a systematic review of other reports on this phenomenon. Through an in-depth analysis of the literature, we highlight some of the leading theories regarding the causes of concomitant dAVF and meningiomas. Our report supports one of the leading theories that impaired venous return, whether through the occlusion of sinuses or sinus manipulation during surgery, plays a role in the development of dAVF. Further understanding may help guide future clinical decision-making and surgical planning.

Keywords: Central nervous system, Embolism, Meningioma, Systematic review, Vascular malformation

1. Introduction

Intracranial meningiomas and dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) are distinct conditions that, in rare cases, can coexist but are seldom reported. Therefore, data on their clinical profile, treatment options, and patient outcomes are limited.

Meningiomas are among the most common types of primary intracranial tumors. Although these tumors are benign in most cases, they can have an insidious clinical course and may persist for years before being diagnosed. These tumors are in the arachnoid layer of the meninges and arise from meningothelial cells. Although the exact etiology is unknown, a few of the reported risk factors include age, female sex, ionizing radiation exposure, and several genetic syndromes.1,2

dAVFs are abnormal shunts between intracranial dural arteries and the venous system. Among intracranial arteriovenous pathologies, dAVFs account for approximately 10–15% of cases.3 The underlying etiology of dAVFs remains unclear. Many factors, including congenital anomalies, have been associated with their occurrence. A few reported cases linked their existence to acquired factors, such as trauma, surgical invasion, infection, or malignancies, leading to the development of venous sinus obstruction and subsequent hypertension.4

Here, we describe a patient who was incidentally found to have a coexisting high-flow dAVF while undergoing surgical treatment for left parietal meningioma. Only 20 published case reports or series of this coexistence have been reported in the literature. We provide a detailed literature review highlighting patient demographics, presenting symptoms, clinical features, and treatment courses to better understand this rare occurrence. We also propose some mechanisms that might lead to the pathogenesis of concomitant dAVFs and meningiomas.

2. Case presentation

A 40-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 1.5-week history of transient weakness in the right arm and leg. He had a longstanding history of seizures and pulsatile tinnitus that was never evaluated. MRI brain revealed a large mass in the left parietal brain [Fig. 1]. The lesion caused a moderate mass effect, but there were no signs of midline shift or apparent falcine herniation. Signs of thrombosis in the superior sagittal sinus were also not observed. The patient was started on dexamethasone (2 mg) orally and referred to the neurosurgery clinic for treatment. The treatment options were discussed with the patient and surgical resection of the left parietal mass was planned.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Pre-operative magnetic resonance image demonstrating a large left parietal avidly-enhancing hypervascular extradural lesion with a dural tail and focal mass effect. A) Axial view. B) Coronal view. C) Sagittal view.

The resection of the left parietal brain mass had to be aborted intraoperatively because of unexpected hypervascularity of the bone overlying the tumor, which compromised the safety of the procedure due to the added risk of hemorrhage. The patient was monitored on an inpatient basis while the interventional radiology team was consulted to perform diagnostic angiography and possible subsequent embolization [Fig. 2]. Angiogram results showed a left parietal meningioma supplied by distal branches of the middle meningeal artery (MMA), anterior cerebral artery, and middle cerebral artery. An incidental finding of high-flow dAVF was also noted. The dAVF was primarily reported to originate from the transcalvarial left occipital branches, but it fed into the posterior aspect of the superior sagittal sinus.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Initial diagnostic cerebral angiogram demonstrating an incidental dural arteriovenous fistula adjacent to but separate from the hypervascular extradural lesion. A-C) Selective angiography of the left internal carotid artery demonstrates a significant amount of pial supply to the tumor via the distal branches of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries and a large venous pedicle draining the tumor into the posterior portion of the superior sagittal sinus. D-E) Selective angiography of the left external carotid artery demonstrates an enlarged occipital artery with distal transcalvarial branches supplying a dural arteriovenous fistula with early venous drainage into the posterior superior sagittal sinus, adjacent to but separate from the tumor. F) Super selective angiography of the left occipital artery demonstrates distal transcalvarial branches supplying a dural arteriovenous fistula.

Given the nature of the hypervascularity of the lesion and its proximity to a high-flow dAVF, transcatheter arterial Onyx embolization of the dAVF was performed prior to surgical resection of the meningioma. Embolization of both the MMA and high-flow dAVF was performed. The high-flow dAVF was occluded which resulted in spontaneous regression. The tumor had a large vascular pedicle with a vein draining directly into the sagittal sinus.

Three days post-embolization, the patient underwent gross total resection of the left parietal mass. The patient tolerated the procedure well, without any intraoperative complications. The final pathology report confirmed the diagnosis of meningioma with a World Health Organization classification histologic grade of 1.

Postoperatively, the patient only experienced mild right hemiparesis, which resolved within a few days prior to discharge. His postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results showed complete resection of the mass, with no residual enhancing lesions in the area. The patient underwent rehabilitation due to weakness at an inpatient pain medicine and rehabilitation center.

The patient continued to follow-up with outpatient neuro-endovascular team that recommended one year angiogram to evaluate recurrence. On repeat angiogram, a complex recurrent dAVF at a similar location in the mid-to posterior-sagittal sinus the following year. Unlike the earlier occurrence, this fistula was supplied by the superficial temporal and middle meningeal arteries [Fig. 3]. There was no evidence of prior feeders from the occipital artery that had been embolized during the last procedure. The patient underwent another transcatheter arterial Onyx embolization of the left MMA. Post-embolization, an approximately 60–75% reduction in flow across the dAVF was observed. No residual shunting was observed in the right external carotid artery branches. However, some residual fistula filling was evident in the branches of the anterior cerebral artery. Overall, the patient tolerated the procedure well. The patient continued to undergo annual diagnostic angiography to monitor the residual fistula filling. At the 3-year follow-up visit, the diagnostic angiogram showed complete resolution of the dAVF, with no evidence of residual fistula filling.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

One year follow-up diagnostic cerebral angiogram. A-C) Selective angiography of the left internal carotid artery demonstrates distal anterior cerebral artery branches extending to form pial collaterals to the dural arteriovenous fistula in the mid/posterior sagittal sinus. D-F) Selective angiography of the left external artery demonstrates an enlarged branch of the superficial temporal artery and middle meningeal artery filling the dural arteriovenous fistula via transosseous collaterals. No evidence of residual or recurrent feeders from the previously embolized occipital artery.

3. Result

A systematic review of the PubMed and SCOPUS databases was conducted using the keywords “dural arteriovenous fistula” and “meningioma.” Articles that were published between the databases’ date of inception until 1/30/2023 were considered. All case reports and series of patients with both dAVFs and meningiomas were collected and analyzed independently by the authors and crosschecked for accuracy. Articles were excluded if they were about any vascular malformation other than dAVF, intracranial tumors other than meningiomas, or dAVFs and meningiomas that did not coexist but occurred as separate temporal events. A total of 118 articles were identified through the database searches, among which 20 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis [Fig. 4]. Each relevant article was thoroughly reviewed to collect information on patient demographics, presenting symptoms, clinical features of each lesion, treatment provided, and outcomes.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

PRISMA flow diagram for the identification process of the relevant studies.

A total of 21 cases of coexisting intracranial dAVFs and meningiomas have been reported in the literature, including the present case [Table 1]. The patients’ ages ranged from 23 to 76 years, with a mean age of 61 years. Our review included 11 males and 10 females. Patients most often presented with headaches (52%), tinnitus (24%), and seizures (14%). The dAVFs were commonly located at the transverse-sigmoid sinus (43%) and superior sagittal sinus (24%). The most common locations for the meningiomas were the tentorium (29%), parietal convexity (14%), frontal convexity (14%), and parasagittal convexity (14%). In 76% of the cases, the sinus was occluded by the meningioma.

Table 1.

Summary of case reports describing patients with concomitant dAVF and intracranial meningioma.

Author Publication Year Patient Age Patient Sex Presenting Symptoms Side Site of dural AVF Site of Meningioma Sinus Occlusion Proximity of Lesions Treatment Outcome
Preul et al 1992 72 M asymptomatic L Superior Sagittal Sinus Frontal Convexity No Remote observation favorable
Yokota et al 1993 65 F vertigo R Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Tentorium Yes Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Arnautovic et al 1998 63 F headache, localized pain in left orbit, left paranasal sinus pain, and constant tinnitus L Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Tentorium Yes Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Chung et al 1999 62 F headaches, tinnitus R Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Tentorium Yes Adjacent tumor resection favorable
Vilela et al 2001 51 M headache, blurred vision R Superior Petrosal Sinus ​+ ​Parietal Convexity Parasagittal Yes Adjacent shunt disconnection ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Vilela et al 2001 56 M headache, right hearing deficit R Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Cerebellomedullary cistern Yes Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Horinaka et al 2003 69 F headache, tinnitus R Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Tentorium Yes Adjacent tumor resection favorable
Ahn et al 2003 45 F headache L Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Parietal Convexity No Remote tumor resection favorable
Inoue et al 2007 76 M headache L Sphenoid ridge Cavernous Sinus No Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Toledo et al 2010 60 M increasing confusion, word-finding difficulties L Superior Sagittal Sinus Parasagittal Yes Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Enatsu et al 2012 76 F asymptomatic R Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Tentorium Yes Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Copeland et al 2013 60 M pulsatile tinnitus, headaches, nausea, vomiting R Superior Sagittal Sinus Falx Yes Adjacent tumor resection favorable
Kusira et al 2014 23 M headache, papilledema BL Sinus Confluence Sinus Confluence Yes Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Hattori et al 2014 70 M dysphasia L Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Sphenoid ridge Yes Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection unfavorable
Labidi et al 2015 59 M headaches, left hand paresthesia, seizures R Vein of Trolard Parietal Convexity Yes Adjacent shunt disconnection ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Quan et al 2019 66 F headache L Transverse-Sigmoid Sinus Tentorium Yes Adjacent tumor resection NR
Takemoto et al 2019 59 F transient aphasia, dysgraphia L Anterior Cranial Fossa Frontal Convexity Yes Adjacent shunt disconnection ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Manzo et al 2020 74 F tiredness, left-sided hemiparesis R Anterior Cranial Fossa Frontal Convexity Yes Adjacent tumor resection ​+ ​fistula transection favorable
Rubio et al 2020 66 F left eye loss of vision L Falcotentorial Posterior Parafalcine Yes Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Nakazawa et al 2022 71 M seizure R Superior Sagittal Sinus Parasagittal No Adjacent transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection favorable
Current Case Report 2022 40 M seizure, pulsatile tinnitus, weakness R Superior Sagittal Sinus Parietal Convexity No Remote transcatheter arterial embolization ​+ ​tumor resection unfavorable

∗dAVF, dural arteriovenous fistula.

The surgical treatment strategy was mentioned in each report. The most common treatment was transcatheter arterial embolization of the dAVF, followed by tumor resection (52%). Five patients (24%) underwent tumor resection alone. Three patients (14%) underwent shunt dis connection followed by tumor resection. One patient underwent tumor resection, followed by dAVF resection. One patient was managed conservatively because they were asymptomatic at presentation. Among the 20 patients for whom outcome data were available, 90% had favorable outcomes. In total, two patients had unfavorable outcomes, including the patient in the current case. The other patient who had an unfavorable outcome experienced worsening consciousness and dysphagia immediately postoperatively. In our case, the patient had recurrent dAVF 1-year postoperatively.

4. Discussion

dAVFs are the most common acquired lesions that can be caused by various underlying conditions. The current literature on this topic has identified a rare association between dAVFs and intracranial tumors. The majority of these cases reported that the tumor involved was a meningioma.5, 6, 7, 8 One of the leading theories proposes a causative relationship between meningiomas obstructing the dural sinuses or inducing dural sinus thrombosis and subsequent development of abnormal dAVFs.9 However, this was not true for all cases of coexisting meningiomas and dAVFs.

There were still a few reports of dAVF formation in patients with no or only partial occlusion of the sinus.10, 11, 12 This was also true in our case, in which MRI showed no signs of sinus occlusion. One theory that might explain the cause of dAVFs in the absence of sinus occlusion is that tumor-related angiogenesis leads to the release of angiogenic factors, such as growth factors and cytokines, that might play a large role in the development of dAVFs.13 Another leading theory that might explain this phenomenon is that tumors, such as meningiomas, are highly vascularized. Their high vascularity poses a risk for the formation of dAVFs due to arteriovenous shunting through the highly vascular tumor bed.11,14,15 This might have contributed to the development of dAVF in our patient, since he initially presented with a hypervascular tumor during surgery.

In the present case, it was unusual for dAVF to recur after the completion of transcatheter arterial embolization and complete surgical resection of the meningioma. Recurrence of dAVF has never been reported in any of the cases of concomitant dAVF and meningiomas. A few studies have reported that the resection of a meningioma leads to the development of dAVF.16, 17, 18, 19, 20 In these studies, the meningioma was most often near or invading the dural sinus. These cases demonstrate that sinus manipulation during intracranial surgery carries a potential risk of dAVF development. In our patient, the meningioma was highly vascularized, with a vein draining directly into the posterior aspect of the superior sagittal sinus. This might be one of the reasons that lead to the recurrence of dAVF after meningioma resection. Although dAVF is a rare occurrence, it should still be considered in patients with hypervascular tumors that are near to or invading the dural sinuses that will require sinus manipulation during intracranial surgery.

5. Conclusion

The relationship between intracranial tumors and vascular malformations remains unclear. This case report highlights some of the clinical nuances that might lead to the coexistence of dAVF and intracranial meningiomas. It also supports the leading theories that impaired venous return, whether through the occlusion of sinuses or sinus manipulation during surgery, plays a role in the development of dAVF. Understanding this rare occurrence is critical to guide the diagnosis and treatment of future patients. Neurosurgeons should consider the risk of dAVF in cases that involve sinus manipulation when planning surgical procedures.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Abhishek S. Bhutada: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Srijan Adhikari: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Joshua Cuoco: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Alexander In: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. John Entwistle: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Mark R. Witcher: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations list

dAVF

dural arteriovenous fistula

MMA

middle meningeal artery

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

References

  • 1.Louis D.N., Perry A., Reifenberger G., et al. The 2016 World Health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wiemels J., Wrensch M., Claus E.B. Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neuro Oncol. 2010;99:307–314. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0386-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reynolds M.R., Lanzino G., Zipfel G.J. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae. Stroke. 2017;48:1424–1431. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vellimana A.K., Daniels D.J., Shah M.N., Zipfel G.J., Lanzino G. Dural arteriovenous fistulas associated with benign meningeal tumors. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:535–544. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1946-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sawamura Y., Janzer R.C., Fankhauser H., Tribolet N. Arteriovenous malformation in meningothelial meningioma: case report. Neurosurgery. 1991;29:109–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chung Y.G., Lee K.C., Lee H.K., Lee N.J. Tentorial meningioma encroaching the transverse sigmoid sinus junction area associated with dural arteriovenous fistulous malformation: a case report. J Kor Med Sci. 1999;14:465–468. doi: 10.3346/jkms.1999.14.4.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miller P.D., Albright A.L. Posterior dural arteriovenous malformation and medulloblastoma in an infant: case report. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:126–130. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199301000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fukawa O., Tanaka T. The association of intracranial meningioma with arteriovenous malformation and aneurysm. Noshinkeigeka. 1977;5:175–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vilela P., Willinsky R., Terbrugge K. Dural arteriovenous fistula associated with neoplastic dural sinus thrombosis: two cases. Neuroradiology. 2001;43:816–820. doi: 10.1007/s002340100570. 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ahn J.Y., Lee B.H., Cho Y.J., Joo J.Y., Lee K.S. Dural arteriovenous fistula associated with meningioma: spontaneous disappearance after tumor removal. Neurol Med. Chir. 2003;43:308–311. doi: 10.2176/nmc.43.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Inoue T., Nishimura S., Hayashi N., Numagami Y., Tomita T., Nishijima M. Cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula associated with the development of sphenoidal ridge meningioma--case report. Neurol Med. Chir. 2007;47:317–321. doi: 10.2176/nmc.47.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nakazawa T., Aihara M., Mizuno H., Yamaguchi R., Yoshimoto Y. Superior sagittal sinus dural arteriovenous fistula with changes in angiographic findings associated with contiguous parasagittal meningioma: a case report. Surg Neurol Int. 2022;13:275. doi: 10.25259/SNI_95_2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Enatsu R., Asahi M., Matsumoto M., Hirai O. Meningioma-related dural arteriovenous fistula fed via a vascular tumor bed: a case report and literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:1010–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Arnautovic K.I., Al-Mefty O., Angtuaco E., Phares L.J. Dural arteriovenous malformations of the transverse/sigmoid sinus acquired from dominant sinus occlusion by a tumor: report of two cases. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:383–388. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199802000-00112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Horinaka N., Nonaka Y., Nakayama T., Mori K., Wada R., Maeda M. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the transverse sinus with concomitant ipsilateral meningioma. Acta Neurochir. 2003;145:501–504. doi: 10.1007/s00701-003-0030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sakaki T., Morimoto T., Nakase H., Kakizaki T., Nagata K. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the posterior fossa developing after surgical occlusion of the sigmoid sinus. Report of five cases. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:113–118. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.1.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yokoyama S., Nakagawa I., Kotsugi M., et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula arising after intracranial surgery in posterior fossa of nondominant sinus: two cases and literature review. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14:602–606. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_5_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gigliotti M.J., Patel N., Simon S. Superior sagittal sinus dural arteriovenous fistula caused by treatment of meningioma masquerades as sinus thrombosis. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2021;23:260–265. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2021.E2021.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Park J.S., Lee J.M. Acquired dural arteriovenous fistula after cerebellopontine angle meningioma: a case report. Medicine (Baltim) 2022;101 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yajima H., Miyawaki S., Koizumi S., et al. Development of a sigmoid sinus dural arteriovenous fistula secondary to sigmoid sinus thrombosis after resection of a foramen magnum meningioma: illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022;4 doi: 10.3171/CASE22253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Neurosurgery: X are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES