Abstract
Background and Aim:
Raw goat milk is a highly nutritious dairy product and a suitable medium for the growth of antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, the leading cause of subclinical mastitis. This study aimed to investigate the resistance status of S. aureus which isolated from goat milk associated with subclinical mastitis cases in Siliragung Subdistrict, Banyuwangi District, East Java, Indonesia.
Materials and Methods:
The S. aureus isolates were recovered from 258 raw goat milk samples from seven different dairy goat farms. Preliminary screening of subclinical mastitis using the California mastitis test, then samples with score +3 and +4 were taken for further isolation and identification, followed by a biochemical test to determine the S. aureus. Moreover, the bacteria susceptibility test against several antimicrobials was done using the disk diffusion method.
Results:
Based on our findings, a total of 66 (25.58%) raw goat milk samples were tested positive for S. aureus, of which 36.36% were identified as multidrug-resistant. Moreover, S. aureus were also identified as resistant to penicillin (81.82%), ampicillin (65.15%), erythromycin (50.52%), and gentamicin (36.09%).
Conclusion:
The prevalence of S. aureus isolated from raw goat milk associated with subclinical mastitis in Siliragung Subdistrict, Banyuwangi District, Indonesia, was recorded at 25.58%. Moreover, 36.36% of S. aureus isolates were categorized as resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. The biosafety and biosecurity procedures during the milking process should be strengthened in dairy goat farms to prevent the transmission of antimicrobial resistance among animals, humans, and environments.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, food security, infectious disease, public health, tropical disease
Introduction
Raw goat milk is categorized as a highly nutritious dairy product, making it a suitable medium for the growth of microorganisms, mainly bacteria [1]. Microbial contamination is one of the primary sources of food contamination worldwide, and in Asian countries such as Indonesia [2–4]. Staphylococcus aureus is a foodborne pathogen of great importance to animal and human health [5]. It is responsible for the contamination of dairy products, such as raw and fresh milk, during their handling and processing, making them unhealthy for human consumption and a threat to individuals who routinely consume dairy products [6]. Raw milk, as a dairy product, might play a potential role in transmitting antimicrobial-resistant bacteria to human populations that consume these products [7]. The occurrence and importance of antimicrobial resistance in S. aureus are triggered by the increasingly extensive use of antibiotics because of improper treatment doses, especially when S. aureus becomes the causative agent of subclinical and clinical mastitis in dairy goats [8]. To date, awareness of antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus spp. has become the primary concern in public health because it affects not only animals but also milk products routinely consumed by humans [9]. In the dairy cattle industry, subclinical mastitis is caused by Staphylococcus spp. affects dairy production worldwide and is associated with the extensive use of several antibiotics [10]. However, studies on antimicrobial resistance in S. aureus associated with subclinical mastitis infections in goats still need to be expanded because most studies have focused only on the prevalence rate of subclinical mastitis cases without investigating the status of antimicrobial resistance in several causative bacteria. In addition, the findings of several studies are limited because the majority focused only on the isolation and identification of Staphylococcus spp. and other bacteria as infectious agents that can potentially cause mastitis [11–13]. However, the prerequisites for the prevention of bacterial transmission at farm or industry levels depend on identifying not only Staphylococcus spp. but also all causative agents of mastitis, with the priority being antibiotic susceptibility patterns [14].
The occurrence of antimicrobial resistance is detrimental to farmers and veterinarians and has a direct impact on the global economy [15, 16]. Bacterial contamination of dairy products may occur directly from infected animals or through other routes, such as cross-contamination during transport, storage, and processing [17]. In East Java, Indonesia, most dairy farming management is still categorized as conventional. Current farming management in East Java results in low-quality milk owing to bacterial contamination, which leads to subclinical mastitis. Staphylococcus aureus is frequently identified as the main causative agent, whereas Streptococcus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacteriaceae, Mycoplasma spp., and other pathogens occur at the lower frequencies [18, 19]. The most common route of S. aureus transmission is through milking management when the milker’s hands have direct contact with the teats of dairy cattle or goats [20]. Other sources of contamination are the water and production equipment used in the milking procedures [21]. The antimicrobial-resistant S. aureus obtained from raw milk samples plays a significant role because these pathogens can infect humans and calves, leading to the spread of this antimicrobial-resistant pathogen to humans and animals [22]. Therefore, antibiotic susceptibility determination in raw milk contaminating bacteria is necessary to monitor potential transmission sources during milking procedures and prevent the transmission of antimicrobial resistance genes among consumers.
To our knowledge, there are no reports of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus isolated from raw goat milk in East Java. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the occurrence of S. aureus as a potential agent for subclinical mastitis in dairy goats from several farms in the Siliragung Subdistrict, Banyuwangi District, East Java, Indonesia. Moreover, this study also assessed scientific information regarding the S. aureus susceptibility patterns to several antibiotics, including those frequently used in human and veterinary treatment, especially in East Java, Indonesia.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
Fresh milk samples were used in this study. Hence, ethical approval was not required for this study.
Study period and location
The study was conducted from May to August 2022. Milk samples were collected from seven goat farms in the Siliragung Subdistrict, Banyuwangi District, East Java, Indonesia (latitude: –8.493277, longitude: 114.084479). Milk samples were aseptically collected from both teats (separate milk) of apparently-healthy lactating goats. Briefly, the teats were wiped with swabs soaked in 70% ethanol, and a few streams of milk were discarded. The 10–15 mL of milk was collected into a sterile tube, labeled, and immediately brought to the Laboratory of Microbiology, School of Health and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga. The samples were kept at 4°C, immediately checked for subclinical mastitis, and then cultured within 24 h of collection.
Study design
A total of 258 raw goat milk samples were collected for this study. Initial screening for subclinical mastitis was performed using the California mastitis test (CMT) (Kruuse, UK). CMT scores were graded as +1, +2, +3, and +4 according to the degree of reaction. Milk samples with CMT scores of +1 and +2 were categorized as negative, while samples +3 or +4 were considered positive. Briefly, CMT was performed using 3–4 mL of raw goat milk, to which an equal volume of CMT reagent was immediately mixed by swirling/circular motion. The reaction was graded based on the intensity of gel formation and color change. Samples with scores of +3 and +4 were used for further isolation and identification of S. aureus [22]. Samples were streaked onto Mannitol salt agar (Merck KGaA, Germany) and incubated at 37°C for 24–48 h. Colonies showing typical and non-typical Staphylococcus characteristics were examined microscopically using Gram staining. Confirmed Staphylococcus genus isolates were further identified using a biochemical panel, including the following tests: catalase, oxidase (Millipore 1.00181.0002, Canada), Voges–Proskauer, coagulase, urease, and fermentation of mannitol to identify the species. Based on culture, Gram staining, and biochemical tests, S. aureus was the only species isolated from all goat milk samples.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test
The antimicrobial susceptibility of S. aureus was determined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller−Hinton agar (Oxoid CMO337, UK). The antibiotic disks used were from Oxoid, with the following types and concentrations: penicillin G (P, 10 IU), gentamicin (GEN, 10 μg), ampicillin (AMP, 10 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg), erythromycin (E, 15 μg), tetracycline (TE, 30 μg), trimethoprim (W, 5 μg), chloramphenicol (C, 30 μg), cephalothin (KF, 30 μg), and novobiocin (NO, 30 μg). The results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Criteria [23]. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 was used as a control. Isolates showing susceptibility to all antibiotics were considered sensitive and those resistant to three or more antimicrobial classes were considered multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates.
Statistical analysis
The experimental data in the present study were designed as tables and figures, then analyzed using a descriptive method. The percentage of MDR was obtained using the formula MDR = A/B, where A is the number of bacteria which categorized as resistant against three or more antibiotics tested and B is the total number of bacteria which performed for the sensitivity test.
Results
A total of 66 (25.58%) raw goat milk samples tested positive for S. aureus (Table-1). All milk samples were collected from seven farms in the Siliragung Subdistrict, Banyuwangi. However, the total dairy goat population in each farm was different, that is 20 (farm 1), 46 (farm 2), 18 (farm 3), 50 (farm 4), 28 (farm 5), 32 (farm 6), and 64 (farm 7). Moreover, all farms still use conventional milking management and do not use a milking machine, so teats frequently have direct contact with the farmer’s hands. Farm 1 had the highest prevalence (40%), followed by farm 4 (32%), 5 (28.57%), 3 (27.77%), 2 (23.91%), and 7 (20.31%). The lowest prevalence was recorded in farm 6 (15.63%). Bacteriological tests of milk samples revealed yellow colonies with yellow zones in mannitol salt agar containing Gram-positive cocci in clusters that were, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative, Voges–Proskauer positive, coagulase-positive, urease-positive, and mannitol fermentation-positive. Based on this identification, the colonies were confirmed to be of S. aureus species. Staphylococcus aureus isolates were categorized as resistant to several antibiotics (Figure-1), and resistance to P was the highest (81.82%) among the other groups. Resistance to NO was the lowest (4.4%) among the other groups of tested antibiotics (Table-2). Moreover, 24 of the 66 S. aureus isolates were categorized as MDR. The highest percentage of MDR was recorded in farm 7 (38.46%), indicating that 5 of 13 S. aureus isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotic classes. The lowest MDR percentage was recorded in farm 3 (20%), with one out of five S. aureus isolates categorized as resistant to more than three classes of antibiotics (Table-3).
Table-1.
Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus from raw goat milk samples in Siliragung Subdistrict, Banyuwangi District, Indonesia.
Farm | Samples (n) | Staphylococcus aureus positive (n) | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 20 | 8 | 40 |
2 | 46 | 11 | 23.91 |
3 | 18 | 5 | 27.77 |
4 | 50 | 16 | 32 |
5 | 28 | 8 | 28.57 |
6 | 32 | 5 | 15.63 |
7 | 64 | 13 | 20.31 |
Figure-1.
The result of the antibiotic diffusion test in a Petri dish with a diameter of 12 cm. (A) Penicillin indicated resistance, (B) ampicillin indicated resistance, (C) erythromycin indicated sensitive, (D) ciprofloxacin indicated sensitive; (E) tetracycline indicated sensitive; (F) chloramphenicol indicated sensitive; (G) cephalothin indicated sensitive; (H) trimethoprim indicated sensitive; (I) gentamicin indicated resistance.
Table-2.
Essential information regarding Staphylococcus aureus resistance against the antibiotics tested.
Class of antibiotics | Groups of antibiotics according to their significant differences | Resistant to the antibiotic (%) | Intermediate to the antibiotic (%) | Sensitive to the antibiotic (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Beta-lactam | Penicillin | 81.82 | - | 18.18 |
Ampicillin | 65.15 | - | 34.85 | |
Cephalothin | 19.51 | 5.97 | 74.52 | |
Aminoglycosides | Gentamicin | 36.09 | 4.16 | 59.75 |
Quinolones | Ciprofloxacin | 13.12 | - | 86.88 |
Macrolides | Erythromycin | 50.52 | 2.51 | 46.97 |
Tetracyclines | Tetracycline | 18.78 | 1.82 | 79.4 |
Sulfonamides | Trimethoprim | 19.83 | 2.12 | 78.05 |
Chloramphenicol | Chloramphenicol | 17 | 1.7 | 81.30 |
Other molecules | Novobiocin | 4.4 | - | 95.60 |
Table-3.
Multidrug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from raw goat milk samples.
Farm | Staphylococcus aureus (n) | MDR S. aureus (n) | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 8 | 3 | 37.5 |
2 | 11 | 3 | 27.27 |
3 | 5 | 1 | 20 |
4 | 16 | 6 | 37.5 |
5 | 8 | 4 | 50 |
6 | 5 | 2 | 40 |
7 | 13 | 5 | 38.46 |
Total | 66 | 24 | 36.36 |
MDR=Multidrug resistance
Discussion
The results of the study showed that the prevalence of S. aureus in Siliragung Subdistrict, Banyuwangi District, Indonesia, was 25.58%, which is higher than that reported in previous studies in Shaanxi, China (23.53%) [24] and the Oromia Region, Ethiopia (16.6%) [5]. However, it is slightly similar to a previous report from Northeast Brazil, which recorded a rate of 22.6% [14]. This high prevalence of subclinical mastitis may be due to improper farming management systems, such as poor milking management, poor environmental sanitation, and conventional milking procedures that lead to S. aureus transmission among dairy goats [18–21].
Based on our study, P was identified as the most resistant among the antibiotics tested and recorded at 81.82%, which is higher than that reported by Jamali et al. [20] and Silva Júnior et al. [14]. In contrast, NO was identified as the most sensitive among the antibiotics tested and recorded at 95.60%, followed by CIP (86.88%). Antibiotics such as KF (74.52%), W (78.05%), TE (79.4%), C (81.30%), CIP (86.88%), and NO (95.60%) were categorized as susceptible when tested against S. aureus isolates in this study. Penicillin (81.82%), AMP (65.15%), E (50.52%), and GEN (36.09%) were categorized as antibiotic-resistant.
Since 1942, S. aureus has been known to be resistant to P and more than 80% of individuals diagnosed with the infection of S. aureus strains were P-resistant by the late 1960s [25]. The present findings showed that 46.97% were still sensitive to E, 50.52% were categorized as resistant, and 2.51% as intermediate. In contrast, Harijani et al. [18] reported that 100% of the isolates were susceptible to E. Novobiocin has been proven to be effective in the treatment of S. aureus infections, in accordance with the studies of Mohamed et al. [26] and Tamendjari et al. [22].
The total percentage of MDR S. aureus isolates in our study was 36.36%. Treatment of bacterial infections is considered very difficult due to the rapid emergence of antimicrobial resistance, especially by multidrug strains, which are resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics, making antibiotic therapy difficult not only in animals but also in humans [24]. Most MDR isolates were suspected to be resistant to beta-lactams, macrolides, and aminoglycosides.
The most frequent manifestations of beta-lactam- mediated resistance in S. aureus are changes in membrane integrity and transmission of resistance genes from one strain to another. Inactivation of antibiotics by enzymatic (beta-lactamase) synthesis, target changes in penicillin-binding proteins, restriction of drug uptake by biofilm development (reduced drug uptake), and active efflux of the medication (drug efflux) are some of the biochemical mechanisms that cause beta-lactam resistance [27].
Macrolide resistance occurs by promoting the separation of peptidyl-tRNA molecules from ribosomes during elongation, thereby preventing the production of proteins. As a result, protein synthesis was irreversibly stopped, and the polypeptide chains were terminated. The adenine-N6 methyltransferase modified 23S rRNA post-transcriptionally, which was the first mechanism of macrolide resistance to be identified. These enzymes modify a single adenine in the 23S rRNA moiety by adding one or two methyl groups [28]. Staphylococcus aureus has two primary strategies for resisting macrolides: Alteration of the bacterial ribosome and macrolide efflux from the bacterial cell and ribosome protection through ATP-binding-cassette family proteins. Broad-spectrum resistance to macrolides is brought on by modification of the ribosomal target site, while efflux and enzymatic inactivation are less significant [29].
Aminoglycoside resistance mainly develops in S. aureus through enzymatic alterations. Enzymatic alteration of these antibiotics’ amino or hydroxyl groups is the primary mechanism underlying aminoglycoside resistance in S. aureus isolates [28]. In staphylococcal species, the enzyme inactivation of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes is a vital resistance mechanism [30].
Antimicrobial resistance can spread through the consumption of food products of animal origin, making food a potential vector for antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Staphylococcus aureus is thought to be a significant cause of zoonotic diseases and a potential source of transmission of antimicrobial-resistant strains between livestock and humans by handling and consuming contaminated food [22]. The outbreak of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which is a challenge for the safety of food products, may be primarily caused by food items such as raw milk and dairy products made from raw milk. This issue is prevalent in the developing world because of poor food handling procedures, insufficient food safety rules, lax hygiene standards, a lack of funding for food safety investments, weak regulatory systems, and insufficient training for food handlers [31]. Poor management in farms and improper use of antimicrobial doses to treat the infection can be risk factors that lead to the transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance genes found in pathogenic bacteria can be horizontally transmitted from the environment to the raw milk. Antimicrobial drugs are widely used on dairy farms. Consequently, the raw milk microbiome can have a high resistance level. Because the bacteria in raw milk are not prevented from reproducing further without heat treatment, their resistance genes are amplified. The risk of horizontal gene transfer may increase due to increased antimicrobial resistance genes. These strains may come into contact with the human microbiota following the intake of animal products, and the conditions may be favorable for horizontal gene transfer-derived dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes among these populations [32].
The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in dairy goat farms can be reduced by routine and proper sanitation procedures. Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria may be present in raw milk if antibiotics are overused at therapeutic and sub-therapeutic levels in dairy goat farms. Therefore, the presence of antibiotic-resistant foodborne microorganisms in raw milk could put humans at risk for food safety if they are not heated [31]. Humans who consume raw milk can be infected with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and antibiotic residues if the withdrawal time is not noticed.
Antibiotic residues have the potential to spread antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms, which can be directly transmitted to humans by ingestion. To reduce antibiotic residues in milk, a multifaceted strategy is needed, including education of milk producers, stricter regulation of antibiotic sales and withdrawal periods, heightened surveillance of residues and antimicrobial resistance in food animal products, and raised awareness and concern among policymakers and veterinary officials about antimicrobial resistance and its transmission pathways [33]. The challenge associated with considering mastitis from a One Health perspective revolves around the diversity of causative bacteria, especially antimicrobial-resistant species, which may impact the pathogenesis of mastitis. The normal bacterial content in milk is increasingly categorized as crucial for triggering immune development; thus, subclinical mastitis presents particular challenges in farms where inappropriate antibiotic therapy is likely to have profound effects on the microbiome [34]. In veterinary medicine, most studies on mastitis have focused on the pathogenic organisms involved, which have led to a better understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of mastitis in the context of bacterial abundance. In addition, a new paradigm for mastitis was proposed based on the importance of host inflammatory mediators as potential disease drivers. Therefore, the One Health approach is relevant to the study of mastitis, which is related to the microenvironmental response to causative pathogens [35]. It is pertinent to emphasize that taking a pathogenic approach, such as with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, will affect the whole environment and antibiotic therapy in cases of subclinical mastitis in dairy goat farms.
Conclusion
This study concludes that S. aureus prevalence rate from raw goat milk associated with subclinical mastitis in Siliragung Subdistrict, Banyuwangi District, East Java, Indonesia, was recorded at 25.58%. Moreover, 36.36% of S. aureus isolates were identified as resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. Results clearly indicated that raw goat milks were contaminated with the antibiotic resistance S. aureus which potentially infecting not only animals but also humans. One Health approach emphasized on preventive measures such as strengthening hygiene and sanitation during the milking process are required to reduce bacterial contamination. The high presence of MDR S. aureus raises questions about the persistent use of antibiotics as a main treatment for udder and other infections on dairy goat farm. Therefore, continuous monitoring and improvement of the hygienic quality of raw milk by ensuring proper handling and production to reduce the spread of MDR bacteria to foods of animal origin.
Authors’ Contributions
RNP: Designed the study, materials preparation, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. AY and ALS: Conducted the surveys and participated in laboratory examinations. JMH: Contributed to the milk samples collection and field examination. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to all of the research assistants in the Laboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, School of Health and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia, for their help during the investigation and manuscript preparation. This study was funded by the Penelitian Internal Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia (Grant number 978/UN3/2022).
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.
References
- 1.Martínez S.P.M, Romero R.A.R, Olivares R.A.C, Ortiz V.E.E, Watty A.E.D. Identification of and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria causing caprine mastitis in three states and a city in Central Mexico under manual and mechanical milking conditions. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res. 2018;7(3):115–118. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang W, Baloch Z, Jiang T, Zhang C, Peng Z, Li F, Fanning S, Ma A, Xu J. Enterotoxigenicity and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from retail food in China. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8(2256):1–11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khalil I.I, Aldabbagh S.Y.A, Shareef A.M. Isolation, identification and detection of some virulence factors in yeasts from local cheese in Mosul city. Iraqi. J. Vet. Sci. 2018;32(1):81–85. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tyasningsih W, Ramandinianto S.C, Ansharieta R, Witaningrum A.M, Permatasari D.A, Wardhana D.K, Effendi M.H, Ugbo E.N. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli isolated from raw milk in East Java, Indonesia. Vet. World. 2022;15(8):2021–2028. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.2021-2028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Regasa S, Mengistu S, Abraha A. Milk safety assessment, isolation, and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Staphylococcus aureus in selected dairy farms of Mukaturi and Sululta Town, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Vet. Med. Int. 2019;2019(1):3063185. doi: 10.1155/2019/3063185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tanzin T, Nazir K.H.M, Zahan M.N, Parvej M.S, Zesmin K, Rahman M.T. Antibiotic resistance profile of bacteria isolated from raw milk samples of cattle and buffaloes. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2016;3(1):62–67. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rainard P, Foucras G, Fitzgerald J.R, Watts J.L, Koop G, Middleton J.R. Knowledge gaps and research priorities in Staphylococcus aureus mastitis control. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018;65(1):149–165. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Swetha C.S, Supriya R.A, Goud S.S, Babu A.J, Rao T.M. A study on the prevalence of zoonotic important methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and VRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CNS and VR-CNS) in raw milk samples of Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh. Pharm. Innov. Int. J. 2017;6(9):17–24. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kupradit C, Innok S, Woraratphoka J, Ketudat-Cairns M. Prevalence and characterization of pathogenic bacteria in Bulk Tank Raw Milk, Thailand. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2020;17(6):588–599. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gomes F, Henriques M. Control of bovine mastitis:Old and recent therapeutic approaches. Curr. Microbiol. 2016;72(4):377–382. doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0958-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.França C.A, Peixoto R.M, Cavalcante M.B, Melo N.F, Oliveira C.J.B, Veschi J.L.A, Mota R.A, Costa M.M. Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus spp. from small ruminant mastitis in Brazil. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2012;32(8):747–753. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Merz A, Stephan R, Johler S. Staphylococcus aureus isolates from goat and sheep milk seem to be closely related and differ from isolates detected from bovine milk. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7(319):1–7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pexara A, Solomakos N, Sergelidis D, Angelidis A.S, Govaris A. Occurrence and antibiotic resistance of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in raw ovine and caprine milk in Greece. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2016;96(3):345–357. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Silva Júnior A.E, Vasconcelos P.C, Saraiva M.M.S, Filho L.S, Silva N.M.V, Pen G, Oliveira C.J.B. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus spp. contaminating raw goat milk. Vet. World. 2021;14(5):1074–1079. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1074-1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.World Bank. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Retrieved from Annual Report 2017. World Bank, Washington, DC. 2017. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org . Retrieved on 22-04-2021.
- 16.World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2018. 13th ed. Switzerland: World Economic Forum, Cologny; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moreno-Grúa E, Pérez-Fuentes S, Muñoz-Silvestre A, Viana D, Fernández-Ros A.B, Sanz-Tejero C, Corpa J.M, Selva L. Characterization of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from commercial rabbitries located in the Iberian Peninsula. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Harijani N, Wandari A, Effendi M.H, Tyasningsih W. Molecular detection of encoding enterotoxin C gene and profile of antibiotic-resistant on Staphylococcus aureus isolated from several dairy farms in East Java, Indonesia. Biochem. Cell. Arch. 2020;20(1):3081–3085. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Effendi M.H, Harijani N, Yanestria S.M, Hastutiek P. Identification of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in raw milk samples from dairy cows in Surabaya, Indonesia. Philipp. J. Vet. Med. 2018;55(SI):109–114. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jamali H, Paydar M, Radmehr B, Ismail S, Dadrasnia A. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk and dairy products. Food Control. 2015;54(1):383–388. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oberoi L, Kaur K, Aggarwal A. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a rural tertiary care hospital in North India. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. Technol. 2012;3(1):200–205. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tamendjari S, Bouzebda F.A, Chaib L, Aggad H, Ramdani M, Bouzebda Z. Antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw cow and goat milk produced in the Tiaret and Souk Ahras areas of Algeria. Vet. World. 2021;14(7):1929–1934. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1929-1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2018) M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Ed. 28th. Twenty Second Informational Supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, West Valley, USA. :54–62. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Qian W, Shen L, Li X, Wang T, Liu M, Wang W, Fu Y, Zeng Q. Epidemiological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus in raw goat milk in Shaanxi province, China. Antibiotics (Basel) 2019;8(3):141. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lobanovska M, Pilla G. Penicillin's discovery and antibiotic resistance:Lessons for the future? Yale J. Biol. Med. 2017;90(1):135–145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mohamed S, Elmohamady M.N, Abdelrahman S, Amer M.M, Abdelhamid A.G. Antibacterial effects of antibiotics and cell-free preparations of probiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis associated with conjunctivitis. Saudi Pharm. J. 2020;28(12):1558–1565. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kumar A, Kaushal M. Progression of b-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. In:Insights into Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. IntechOpen, London, United Kingdom. 2021:147. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Parthasarathy A.K, Chougale R.A. Antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In:Insights into Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. IntechOpen, London, United Kingdom. 2021:3. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Miklasińska-Majdanik M. Mechanisms of resistance to macrolide antibiotics among Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021;10(11):1406. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mahdiyoun S.M, Kazemian H, Ahanjan M, Houri H, Goudarzi M. Frequency of aminoglycoside-resistance genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from hospitalized patients. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2016;9(8):e35052. doi: 10.5812/jjm.35052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hassani S, Moosavy M.H, Gharajalar S.N, Khatibi S.A, Hajibemani A, Barabadi Z. High prevalence of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic foodborne bacteria isolated from bovine milk. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):3878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07845-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tóth A.G, Csabai I, Krikó E, Tőzsér D, Maróti G, Patai Á.V, Makrai L, Szita G, Solymosi N. Antimicrobial resistance genes in raw milk for human consumption. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63675-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brown K, Mugoh M, Call D.R, Omulo S. Antibiotic residues and antibiotic-resistant bacteria detected in milk marketed for human consumption in Kibera, Nairobi. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu J, Zhu Y, Jay-Russell M, Lemay D.G, Mills D.A. Reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance genes in retail raw milk. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00861-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huges K, Watson C.J. The mammary microenvironment in mastitis in humans, dairy ruminants, rabbits and rodents:A one health focus. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2018;23(1–2):27–41. doi: 10.1007/s10911-018-9395-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]