Abstract
In our search for novel inhibitors of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), a new class of thiourea inhibitors was discovered. N-{4-[3-(5-Chloro-2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-thioureido]-phenyl}-acetamide and its 2-fluoro-benzamide derivative inhibited HSV-1 replication. HSV-2, human cytomegalovirus, and varicella-zoster virus were inhibited to a lesser extent. The compounds acted late in the replication cycle by impairing both the cleavage of concatameric viral DNA into progeny genome length and the packaging of the DNA into capsids, indicative of a defect in the encapsidation process. To uncover the molecular target of the inhibition, resistant HSV-1 isolates were generated, and the mutation responsible for the resistance was mapped using marker transfer techniques. Each of three independent isolates had point mutations in the UL6 gene which resulted in independent single-amino-acid changes. One mutation was located in the N terminus of the protein (E121D), while two were located close together in the C terminus (A618V and Q621R). Each of these point mutations was sufficient to confer drug resistance when introduced into wild-type virus. The UL6 gene is one of the seven HSV-1 genes known to play a role in DNA packaging. This novel class of inhibitors has provided a new tool for dissection of HSV-1 encapsidation mechanisms and has uncovered a new viable target for the treatment of herpesviral diseases.
The herpesvirus family has many members that are human pathogens and make a significant contribution to morbidity and mortality associated with viral diseases. Based on criteria such as host cell specificity, oncogenicity, length of replication cycle, and genome arrangement, the herpesviruses have been divided into alpha-, beta-, and gammaherpesviruses (31). The alphaherpesviruses herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2 latently infect nerve cells. HSV-1 is primarily associated with herpes labialis, and HSV-2 is associated with herpes genitalis, but both types have been associated with both diseases (28, 39, 47). In immunocompetent adults, these diseases often recur due to reactivation of the virus from the latent state. HSV infections of immunocompromised patients such as transplant and AIDS patients are often chronic and fatal. Current therapy for HSV disease consists of nucleoside analogs such as acyclovir (ACV) and valacyclovir, a prodrug of ACV, and pencyclovir (PCV) and its prodrug, famcyclovir. ACV and PCV are selectively phosphorylated by the viral thymidine kinase in HSV-infected cells, followed by further phosphorylation to the triphosphate by cellular kinases. Triphosphorylated ACV and PCV are both inhibitors of the viral DNA polymerase, and ACV also acts as a chain terminator when incorporated into the nascent viral DNA chain (4, 13). Drug resistance can occur in chronic infections, where replication is ineffectively curtailed by the immune system. Recently increasing numbers of drug-resistant HSV strains have been isolated from immunocompromised people. The mechanism of resistance of most ACV-resistant isolates is associated with thymidine kinase alterations, but some have mutations associated with the viral DNA polymerase (9, 10, 27). It is clear that alternative treatment options which have new mechanisms of action are needed. This will enable dual therapy and provide alternatives for patients with drug-resistant infections.
The life cycle of herpesviruses is a highly regulated process (31). After entry of the virus into the cell, the nucleocapsid migrates to the nucleus, where the viral DNA is deposited and transcription of so-called immediate-early genes occurs. The resulting immediate-early proteins initiate transcription of early genes, some of which encode proteins from the viral DNA replication machinery. Viral DNA is then replicated in what is believed to be a rolling-circle mechanism, resulting in concatameric DNA. At approximately the same time, the assembly of viral procapsids commences in the nucleus. During the process of encapsidation, the progeny viral DNA is cleaved to monomeric forms, and in a closely coupled process, the monomeric DNA is packaged into these immature capsids. Encapsidated genomes then migrate out of the nucleus, acquire a lipid envelope containing viral glycoproteins, and leave the cell (15, 32). Each of these steps in the replication cycle, in theory, could be inhibited by small-molecule therapeutics.
We have discovered a new class of compounds in our search for novel HSV inhibitors. We describe here two thiourea molecules that inhibit HSV through a novel mechanism. Instead of inhibiting the replication of viral DNA, we show that these compounds prevent the cleavage and packaging of viral DNA. Seven HSV-1 genes have been shown to be involved in the encapsidation process, ULs 6, 15, 17, 25, 28, 32, and 33 (1, 2, 3, 8, 20–22, 25, 26, 35, 41, 46, 48). When HSV viruses containing loss-of-function mutations in these encapsidation genes are used to infect cells, the viral progeny DNA fails to be packaged into capsids.
Experiments with laboratory-generated mutants resistant to the compounds described here indicated that resistance was associated with mutations in the UL6 open reading frame. The UL6 product is a 75-kDa protein that is a component of capsids (24). UL6 deletion mutants are defective in both DNA packaging and cleavage (20, 24).
The results presented here suggest that the encapsidation process in general, and the UL6 gene product in particular, are valid targets for antiherpesvirus chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and viruses.
Vero cells were cultured in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (DMEM; Mediatech, Herndon, Va.) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 5% calf serum (CS), penicillin, streptomycin, and l-glutamine. HSV-1 strain Patton was obtained from R. Hyman (The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.). HSV-1 strain E377 and HSV-2 strains 12 and 186 were obtained from C. P. Cerini (Wyeth Lederle Vaccine Research, Pearl River, N.Y.). HSV types I and II were propagated on Vero cells in the presence of 2% CS. Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) strain Ellen was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (no. 1367-VR) and propagated in human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells in DMEM with 2% CS.
The construction and isolation of recombinant mutant human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), designated RV12174, containing the β-glucuronidase gene under the control of the US3 immediate-early promoter was done by the general method described previously (17). Plasmid pd1US3-Bgluc was constructed. Sequentially, this plasmid contains the 1.706-kb PstI-PstI fragment (HCMV AD169 bases 196447 to 194741 [GenBank accession number X17403] containing the US6 flanking sequences and the US3 promoter), the β-glucuronidase gene, and the 2.075-kb Asp718-ApaI fragment (HCMV AD169 bases 194108 to 192033, containing the US3 polyadenylation sequence and the US2-US1 flanking sequences). Following plasmid linearization and cotransfection with HCMV wild-type strain AD169 genomic DNA, plaques containing β-glucuronidase-expressing virus were picked and purified. The proper genomic organization of the mutant HCMV was verified by DNA blot hybridization analysis (data not shown) as previously described (17).
Compounds.
CL-253824 was obtained from Alfred Bader Chemical Company (catalog no. S68470-8). WAY-150138 was prepared in a three-step procedure from commercially available starting materials. N-BOC-p-phenylenediamine (Fluka, Milwaukee, Wis.) was acylated by standard methods with 2-fluorobenzoyl chloride. The resulting amide was treated with trifluoroacetic acid to give the free aniline. This material was reacted with 5-chloro-2,4-dimethoxyphenylisothiocyanate (Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) to give the desired product.
Virus infection and treatment with compounds. (i) Automated ELISA format.
Growth of HSV in the presence of compounds was monitored after 1 day by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in microtiter plates (3.5 × 104 Vero cells/well in 96-well plates [Corning]), using primary antibodies against gD (DL6 Mab; A. Abramovitz, Wyeth Lederle Vaccine Research, Pearl River, N.Y.) (16). Growth of VZV in the presence of compounds was monitored after 3 days by ELISA in microtiter plates. VZV-infected cells were mixed with HFF cells at an empirically established ratio. Reagents used for the VZV ELISA were anti-VZV gpII primary antibody (Advanced Biotechnologies Incorporated, Columbia, Md.). The assays were developed with β-galactosidase-linked secondary antibodies A131GN (for HSV) or A106GS (VZV) (American Qualex, La Miranda, Calif.) and the fluorogenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-d-galactoside (Sigma).
(ii) Automated β-glucuronidase assay.
Growth of HCMV-infected HFF cells in the presence of compounds was monitored after 4 days (3.5 × 104 cells/well in a 96-well microtiter plate). The medium was aspirated, and cells were lysed in the presence of fluorescent β-glucuronidase substrate (0.1% 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-d-glucuronide [Sigma], 31.7 mM Na2HPO4, 39.8 mM NaH2PO4 · 1 H2O, 10 mM KCl, 0.86 mM MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.1% Triton X-100). After incubation at 37°C for 20 min, fluorescence was measured (excitation at 365 nm and emission at 450 nm).
(iii) All other assays.
Vero cells were plated in 35-mm dishes as a confluent monolayer in DMEM with 2% CS and infected the next day as follows. Cells were washed in DMEM–2% CS, and HSV-1 virus was added in 1 ml of DMEM–2% CS at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5. Virus was removed after 1 h of infection and replaced with 2 ml of DMEM–2% CS. Antiviral compounds were diluted from a stock of 10 mg/ml in dimethyl sulfoxide into DMEM–2% CS to a final concentration of 10 μg/ml (WAY-150138) or 30 μg/ml (CL-253824) and added to cells at the times indicated in the text. Untreated cells were processed for yield reduction or DNA cleavage analysis at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 h postinfection (h.p.i.); compound-treated cells were processed at 24 h.p.i.
Virus yield titration.
Dishes with HSV-1-infected Vero cells (MOI, 0.05 to 1) were frozen at −70°C and thawed at room temperature (RT). Cell lysates were collected in 15-ml tubes and sonicated in a sonicator waterbath (Branson, Shelton, Conn.), and cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 1,000 rpm for 5 min at RT in a GPKR centrifuge (Beckman, Fullerton, Calif.). Supernatants were transferred to a new tube, and serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared in DMEM–2% CS. Vero cells were plated at 4 × 105 cells per well in 12-well plates 1 day before use. Virus dilutions were added to Vero cells, 1 ml per well, and incubated for 1 h. Virus inocula were aspirated and replaced with 1 ml of DMEM–2% CS, and cells were incubated for 2 days. Cells were fixed by addition of 20% trichloroacetic acid to a final concentration of approximately 10% and incubated for 5 min at RT. Cells were stained with 1% crystal violet in 20% methanol in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Mediatech, Herndon, Va.) for 10 min at RT. Plaques were counted manually.
Analysis of DNA cleavage.
HSV-1-infected Vero cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed by the addition of 0.5 ml of 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5)–10 mM EDTA (TE) with 0.45% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The viscous cell lysates were scraped into a microcentrifuge tube. RNA was degraded by the addition of 2.5 μl of 10-mg/ml RNase A (Sigma) and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Protein was degraded by addition of 27.5 μl of 20-mg/ml pronase (Sigma), and incubated at 37°C overnight. Alternatively, cells were lysed essentially as before, but DNA was precipitated with NaCl according to Rosenthal et al. (33) before phenol extraction. Lysates were extracted with phenol followed by chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and precipitated with ethanol. DNA pellets were air dried and resuspended in 150 μl of TE.
Viral DNA was digested with BamHI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) and separated on a 1% agarose gel in Tris-borate-EDTA or Tris-acetic acid-EDTA buffer (37). The DNA was transferred to 0.45-μm-pore Nytran membrane (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, N.H.) by capillary transfer as described in Sambrook et al. (37). DNA was cross-linked to the membrane by UV cross-linking in a Stratalinker (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The DNA blot was processed as described by Sambrook et al. (37) and probed with the BamHI SP fragment of HSV-1 (F strain) (34), which was labeled by the random primer method (14).
Generation of resistant virus.
To generate HSV-1 isolates resistant to the compounds, HSV-1 virus was repeatedly passaged in Vero cells at a low MOI (0.01) in the presence of increasing concentrations of compounds. At each passage, the culture was frozen when 90 to 100% cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed. The cell suspension was thawed and transferred to a 15-ml tube, sonicated for 1 min, and centrifuged at 1,000 rpm in a GPKR centrifuge (Beckman) to remove cell debris. Virus in the supernatant was counted and used in the next round of infection. Two isolates of HSV-1 resistant to WAY-150138 were generated. One, 138R/5, was grown by serial passage from 0.5 to 1 to 5 μg of compound per ml (one round each), followed by one round of plaque purification. The second, 138R/30, was grown at a high (30 μg/ml) concentration of WAY-150138. It took 10 days for full CPE to develop. This virus was plaque purified four times. Virus resistant to CL-253824 was generated in the presence of increasing concentrations of CL-253824 (2.5 to 5 μg/ml, one round each) followed by three rounds at 10 μg/ml, resulting in virus 253R. This virus was plaque purified four times.
Marker transfer.
To isolate infectious viral DNA, Vero cells grown in T175 flasks were infected in DMEM–2% CS with wild-type or resistant HSV-1 isolates at an MOI of 1. Cells were grown at 34°C until maximum CPE was reached (2 days). Cells were collected by shaking the flasks, pouring the cells into 50-ml tubes, and spinning at 2,000 rpm for 10 min. The medium was removed, and the cells were resuspended in 5 ml of TE per pellet. After pooling two pellets, SDS was added to 0.45% and pronase to 1 mg/ml, and the lysates were incubated at 37°C overnight. After the addition of saturated NaI in TE (15.5 ml) and 11 μl of 10-mg/ml ethidium bromide, 70Ti centrifuge tubes were filled. Tubes were spun at 45,000 rpm in a 70Ti rotor (Beckman) for 65 h. The lower band containing the viral DNA was recovered by aspiration with a syringe through the tube wall, extracted with TE-saturated butanol, and dialyzed against 100 mM NaCl in TE.
Marker transfer experiments were conducted using the calcium phosphate precipitation method (37). Approximately 1 μg of infectious DNA was precipitated with EcoRI-digested plasmid DNA (10- to 50-fold molar excess) and salmon sperm DNA (Sigma; total DNA, 10 μg per dish). The precipitate was placed onto a 60-mm dish containing 106 Vero cells. Cells were incubated for 5 h at 37°C, and the medium was removed and replaced with 15% glycerol in buffered saline. Cells were incubated for 2 min, and the medium was replaced with DMEM–2% CS and incubated overnight. The next day, cells were put under selection with 30 μg of either WAY-150138 or CL-253824 per ml. Plaques were allowed to develop for 2 days.
For subcloning of DNA fragments, DNA from wild-type and resistant viruses was isolated as described by Mohr and Gluzman (23) and digested with EcoRI or BglII. All EcoRI fragments and the 10.5-kb BglII K fragment were subcloned into the EcoRI and BamHI sites, respectively, of pT7-1 (US Biochemical, Cleveland, Ohio). The BglII-ScaI fragments from the plasmids containing each of the resistant UL6 genes were subcloned into pBluescript II SK+ digested with BamHI and EcoRV to create pBSwt, pBSR (from 253R), pBS5 (from 138R/5), and pBS30 (from 138R/30).
The entire BglII-ScaI fragments from 253R and wild-type virus and the entire UL6 gene from 138R/5 and 138R/30 were sequenced.
To show that the mutations found in the UL6 gene were responsible for the resistant phenotype, the AscI-AscI fragment in pBSwt was replaced with the same AscI fragment from 132R/5. Also, the XhoI-HindIII fragment from pBSwt was replaced with the same fragment from pBS30, and the Age1-Age1 fragment was replaced with the same fragment from pBSR. All subcloning of the mutations was confirmed by sequencing.
Electron microscopy.
Vero cells grown in T175 flasks were infected with wt HSV-1 or 253R virus at an MOI of 2 in the absence or presence of CL-253824 (30 μg/ml) and grown for 24 h. Cells were harvested by scraping, washed twice, and fixed sequentially with 3% glutaraldehyde and 0.8% OsO4, both in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.5). During subsequent dehydration in graded ethanol and propylene oxide, the cells were stained with 50% saturated uranyl acetate in 50% ethanol. They were embedded in Poly/Bed 812/Araldite 502 (Polysciences, Inc. Warrington, Pa.). Thin sections were stained with Reynolds' lead citrate (30) and examined in a JEOL 100CX electron microscope using an accelerating voltage of 60 kV.
RESULTS
During an automated screen of a proprietary chemical library for molecules with antiherpesvirus activity, a compound, CL-253824, with modest activity against HSV-1 was discovered (Fig. 1). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) against HSV-1 (Patton) in an ELISA assay was 3 μg/ml (7.9 μM) (Table 1). Antiviral activity was slightly less against another HSV-1 strain (E377; IC50, 9.3 μg/ml) and HSV-2 strains 12 and 186 (IC50, 11 and 27 μg/ml, respectively). CL-253824 had even less inhibitory activity against HCMV, VZV, and other nonherpesviruses tested (influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and parainfluenza virus type 3; data not shown). In an effort to increase the antiviral activity, a 2-fluoro-benzamido analogue (WAY-150138; Fig. 1) was synthesized, which had a more than 10-fold increased potency (IC50 of 0.2 μg/ml [0.43 μM]) against HSV-1 Patton (Table 1). Activity against HSV-2 and HCMV was not improved as dramatically as against HSV-1 (two- to sixfold), but no increase in activity was seen against VZV.
FIG. 1.
Structures of CL-253824 (R = H) and WAY-150138 (R = 2-fluoro phenyl).
TABLE 1.
Activity of CL-253824 and WAY-150138 against HSV-1, HSV-2, HCMV, and VZVa
| Virus | Strain | IC50
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL253824
|
WAY-150138
|
||||
| μg/ml | μM | μg/ml | μM | ||
| HSV-1 | Patton | 3 | 7.9 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| HSV-1 | E377 | 9.3 | 24.5 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
| HSV-2 | 12 | 11 | 28.9 | 6.8 | 14.8 |
| HSV-2 | 186 | 27 | 71.1 | 8.9 | 19.3 |
| HCMV | AD169 | 30.7 | 80.8 | 6 | 13.0 |
| VZV | Ellen | >10* | >26.3* | >10* | >21.7* |
IC50 values were determined by growing several herpesvirus strains in the presence of various concentration of compound. Virus replication was determined by ELISA as described in Materials and Methods. *, highest concentration tested.
Effect of time of inhibitor addition on virus yield.
To investigate the mode of action of this new class of thiourea HSV-1 inhibitors, an experiment was performed in which the compounds were added at different times after infection. Vero cells were infected with HSV-1, and CL-253824 or WAY-150138 was added at 2-h intervals from 0 to 10 h.p.i. Virus was harvested from all plates at 24 h.p.i. and counted (Table 2). When added at 0 or 2 h.p.i., CL-253824 reduced the viral yield by almost 37-fold and WAY-150138 by over 750-fold; when the compound was added at 4 h.p.i., virus yield was still significantly inhibited. In contrast, these compounds had no effect on virus yield when added at 6 h.p.i. or later. Viral DNA synthesis in HSV-1-infected cells starts around 3 h after infection (32) (see also Fig. 2). If a compound added after viral replication has started still has an inhibitory effect, it must affect a process later in the viral life cycle. Thus, these results suggested that the compounds did not inhibit DNA replication, but likely affect a later step in the viral life cycle, such as late protein synthesis, DNA processing, or capsid maturation. To further confirm the lack of DNA replication inhibition, viral DNA isolated at various times postinfection from mock-treated and CL-253824-treated infected cells was analyzed by slot blot hybridization. Viral DNA from 104 cells was loaded on a slot blot with a titration of purified HSV DNA and probed with a radiolabeled HSV-1 EcoRI-A fragment. Quantitation of the resulting autoradiograph by densitometry showed the presence of 10 ng of DNA in CL-253824-treated cells versus 13 ng in untreated cells at 14 h.p.i. At 18 h.p.i. the amount of viral DNA in treated versus untreated cells was 20 versus 18 ng (data not shown). The effects of the compounds on protein synthesis were examined, but no differences with untreated infected cells were detected (data not shown).
TABLE 2.
Effect of compounds on virus yielda
| Time of compound addition (h.p.i.) | Fold reduction in yield
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CL253824 | WAY-150138 | |
| 0 | 36.7 | 383.3 |
| 2 | 18.3 | 766.7 |
| 4 | 16.9 | 32.9 |
| 6 | 1.6 | 3.3 |
| 8 | 1.1 | 2.9 |
| 10 | ND | 2.6 |
| 24 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Vero cells were infected with HSV-1 in the presence of CL-253824 (30 μg/ml) or WAY-150138 (10 μg/ml) throughout the experiment (0 h), or compound was added at later times after infection (2 to 10 h.p.i.). Virus was harvested at 24 h.p.i., and the reduction in yield was determined by plaque titration. The cells in the 24-h time point were not exposed to compound. The fold reduction of yield compared to the 24 h.p.i. untreated sample is listed. ND, not determined.
FIG. 2.
Time course of DNA cleavage. (A) Representation of the HSV-1 genome, indicating the positions of internal joint BamHI-K and the terminal BamHI-P and -S fragments. (B) Time course of DNA synthesis and cleavage in infected, untreated cells. Vero cells were infected at an MOI of 5 with HSV-1 and harvested at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, or 24 h.p.i. (lanes 1 to 7). Viral DNA was extracted, digested with BamHI, separated on a 1% agarose gel, and analyzed by Southern blotting using the BamHI-K fragment, which spans the cleavage joint, as a probe. The positions of BamHI fragments K (joint) and S and P (termini) are indicated. The image has been chosen intentionally dark to show the presence of cleavage products at 6 h.p.i. (C) Effect of WAY-150138 on DNA cleavage. Vero cells were infected at an MOI of 5 with HSV-1. WAY-150138 (10 μg/ml) was added at 0 to 10 h.p.i. (lanes 1 to 6). Lane 7 had no compound added. Viral DNA was harvested at 24 h.p.i. Viral DNA was extracted, digested with BamHI, and analyzed by Southern blotting using the BamHI K fragment as a probe. The image has been chosen intentionally dark to show the presence of cleavage products at 4 h.p.i.
Inhibition of viral DNA cleavage.
One of the processes in the viral life cycle which starts between 4 and 6 h.p.i. is capsid maturation (32). During capsid maturation, the newly replicated viral DNA is cleaved into unit length and packaged into capsids (15, 32). To analyze the kinetics of viral DNA cleavage, Vero cells were infected with HSV-1, and viral DNA was harvested at various times after infection. The DNA was then analyzed by Southern blot for assessment of total DNA synthesis and cleavage.
To facilitate cleavage analysis, DNA was digested with BamHI restriction enzyme prior to gel electrophoresis. The HSV-1 genome contains inverted repeats bordering each of two unique DNA components (L and S). After cleavage, each unit-length genome has internal repeats at the junction of the L and S components (i.e., the joint) and two terminal repeats (i.e., the molecular ends of each genome) (Fig. 2A). The DNA blot was probed with the BamHI K fragment, which spans the joint and is partly repeated in each of the terminal BamHI fragments S and P. Viral DNA synthesis was initially detected after 4 h.p.i., and terminal fragments were observed at 6 h.p.i. (Fig. 2B). Thus, the time of initial DNA cleavage is similar to the time when the compounds fail to inhibit virus (Table 2).
To confirm this, Vero cells were infected with HSV-1, and WAY-150138 was added at 2-h intervals and maintained for 24 h, at which time DNA was harvested and analyzed by DNA blot (Fig. 2C). When the compound was added prior to 4 h.p.i., substantial amounts of viral DNA were detected, but no free termini were observed, indicating that the progeny DNA had not been cleaved. When compound addition was delayed to 6 h.p.i., DNA cleavage was detected, indicating that the process that the compound inhibited had presumably already commenced. Viral DNA replication was not affected even when WAY-150138 was present from the start of infection (0 h.p.i.), as indicated by the presence of uncleaved (i.e., joint) DNA.
Effect of inhibitors on capsid morphology.
The cleavage of viral DNA and the packaging of the DNA into capsids are closely linked. The lack of viral DNA cleavage is usually accompanied by the accumulation of immature (empty) B-type capsids in the nucleus of infected cells and a decrease in the number of mature, DNA-containing C capsids (1, 15). We examined the morphology of the HSV-1 capsids in infected cells treated with CL-253824 by electron microscopy. Representative electron micrographs of the cells show that while both immature B capsids and mature C capsids could be found in untreated cells (Fig. 3A), no mature C capsids were found in any of the compound-treated cells that we examined (Fig. 3B). The large cluster of capsids in the nucleus shown in Fig. 3B, a common feature of HSV-1 infection (32), was also observed in untreated HSV-1-infected Vero cells. HSV-1 can produce up to 100 infectious progeny virus particles per cell (45). With a yield reduction of up to 750-fold (Fig. 2), it was not surprising that we could not detect any C capsids in treated cells.
FIG. 3.
Electron micrographs of virus-infected cells. Vero cells were infected with wild-type (A and B) or 253R (C and D) HSV-1. One hour after infection, the medium was replaced with medium without (A and C) or with 30 μg of CL-253824 (B and D) per ml and processed for electron microscopy as described in Materials and Methods. Solid arrows, B capsids; open arrows, C capsids; N, nucleus.
Selection of resistant virus.
To unravel the mechanism of action of the compounds at the molecular level, HSV-1 was serially passaged in Vero cells in the presence of inhibitor, resulting in the generation of compound-resistant mutants. Three independent mutants were purified: one resistant to CL-253824 (253R) and two resistant to WAY-150138 (138R/5 and 138R/30). All isolates grew with wild-type kinetics (Fig. 4). All isolates were resistant to high (10 times the IC50) concentrations of inhibitor and cross-resistant to the other compound (data not shown).
FIG. 4.
Growth analysis of wild-type and resistant viruses. Vero cells were infected with wild-type (⧫) or resistant HSV-1 Patton isolates 253R (■), 138R/5 (▴), and 138R/30 (●) at an MOI of 0.05 to 0.1 and harvested at various times between 0 and 24 h.p.i. Virus yields were determined by plaque assays and plotted.
Characterization of resistant virus.
Initial characterization of the resistant viruses consisted of analysis of the capsid morphology by electron microscopy and DNA cleavage analysis by DNA blot. When Vero cells were infected with HSV-1 253R in either the absence or presence of CL-253824, examination by electron microscopy revealed no differences. Mature C capsids were detected in both the absence (Fig. 3C) and presence (Fig. 3D) of compound. The morphology of the capsids was indistinguishable from that of capsids found in untreated wild-type virus (Fig. 3A).
The extent of DNA cleavage in Vero cells infected with 253R in the presence of CL-253824 (Fig. 5a) or WAY-150138 (Fig. 5b) was also analyzed. In the presence or absence of compounds, DNA termini were detected in cells infected with resistant viruses (lanes 3 and 4). In contrast, in cells infected with wild-type HSV-1 DNA, termini were not detected in the presence of compound (lanes 2).
FIG. 5.
Analysis of DNA cleavage in resistant virus-infected cells. (a) Vero cells were infected at an MOI of 3 with wild-type (wt, lanes 1 and 2) or 253R virus (lanes 3 and 4) in the absence (lanes 1 and 3) or presence (lanes 2 and 4) of CL-253824 (75 μg/ml) for 14 h. (b) Vero cells were infected at an MOI of 5 with wild-type (wt, lanes 1 and 2) or 138R/5 virus with WAY-150138 (10 μg/ml) (lanes 3 and 4) and cultured for 24 h. Viral DNA was harvested, digested with BamHI, separated on a 1% agarose gel, and analyzed by Southern blotting using the BamHI K fragment, which spans the cleavage joint (see Fig. 2A), as a probe. The positions of BamHI fragments K (joint) and S and P (termini) are indicated.
Identification of the resistance gene.
To date, at least seven HSV gene products have been implicated in participating in the encapsidation process. These include UL's 6, 15, 17, 25, 28, 32, and 33. To determine which HSV gene carried the mutation that conferred resistance to our inhibitors, marker transfer experiments were performed. To facilitate this, EcoRI restriction fragments of the resistant viruses were subcloned and individually cotransfected into Vero cells with infectious wild-type DNA. After the cells were allowed to recover for 24 h, either CL-253824 or WAY-150138 selection was applied. In all cases, only the EcoRI-D fragment conferred resistance (i.e., allowed viral growth), whereas no virus growth was observed with any other fragment (Table 3). The EcoRI-D fragment was further subcloned, and the marker transfer procedure was repeated. The smallest fragment tested that conferred resistance to the compounds was the 4-kb BglII-ScaI subfragment (see Fig. 6) (Table 3). The BglII-ScaI fragment contains the entire UL6, UL7, and UL8 open reading frames (ORFs) and the 3′ end of the UL5 gene. UL5 and UL8 are part of the helicase-primase complex which is involved in DNA replication (11, 42). HSV-1 UL7 has an unknown function, but its homologue in bovine herpes virus has been shown to be a nonessential cytoplasmic protein (38). UL6 was the most interesting candidate, since its involvement in the encapsidation process has been documented (20, 24, 25). At this point, the 4-kb BglII-ScaI fragments were sequenced in their entirety, revealing that each resistant isolate contained one point mutation in the UL6 gene (Table 4). The mutation in HSV-1 138R/30 resulted in a change of glutamic acid 121 into aspartic acid, a conservative amino acid change since both are negatively charged. The other two viruses had mutations at the C terminus; in 253R, alanine 618 was mutated to a valine, and in 138R/5, glutamine 621 was changed to an arginine. The mutation in 138R/5 resulted in the most drastic change, from an uncharged glutamine to a positively charged arginine.
TABLE 3.
Marker rescue efficiencies of restriction fragments derived from resistant viruses in the presence of the compoundsa
| Fragment | Plating efficiency
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138R/5 | 138R/30 | 253R | Wild type | |
| EcoD | 0.27 | 0.82 | 0.58 | 0 |
| BglK | 0.58 | 0.05 | n.t. | 0 |
| BamHI-9 | 0.16 | 0.35 | n.t. | 0 |
| BamHI-3.5 | 0 | 0 | n.t. | 0 |
| BamHI-4.5 | 0 | 0 | n.t. | 0 |
| Del BglII | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BglII-ScaI | 0.03 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0 |
| BS5XH | 0.01 | |||
| BS30Asc | 0.32 | |||
| BSRAge | 0.26 | |||
138R virus fragments were plated in the presence of WAY-150138 (30 μg/ml), and 253R virus fragments were plated in the presence of CL-253824 (30 μg/ml). Fragments are explained in Fig. 6. BS5XH, BS30Asc, and BSRAge are the XhoI-HindIII fragment of 138R/5, AscI fragment of 138R/30, and AgeI fragment of 253R, respectively, cloned into BglII-ScaI wild-type fragment. Plating efficiency is expressed as the number of plaques in the presence of compound divided by the number of plaques in the absence of compound. n.t., not tested.
FIG. 6.
Marker transfer strategy. 1. Schematic representation of the HSV-1 genome. 2. Location of the EcoRI-D fragment in the HSV-1 genome. The locations of restriction sites used for finer mapping are indicated (Bg, BglII; BH, BamHI; E, EcoRI; S, ScaI). 3. Designation of the EcoRI-D subfragments used for marker transfer. 4. Locations of ORFs on the BglII-ScaI fragment. Restriction sites used for subcloning of the minimal fragment conferring resistance are indicated (A, AscI; G, AgeI; H, HindIII; X, XhoI).
TABLE 4.
UL6 mutations resulting in resistancea
| UL6 isolate | Nucleotide change | Amino acid change |
|---|---|---|
| 138R/30 | G363T | E121D |
| 253R | C1853T | A618V |
| 138R/5 | A1862G | Q621R |
Positions are numbered from the beginning of the UL6 reading frame.
The ultimate proof that each of these mutations conferred resistance to the compounds was shown by subcloning a minimal fragment containing the mutation into the wild-type BglII-ScaI fragment. The 210-bp XhoI-HindIII fragment of the 138R/30 BglII-ScaI fragment, the 231-bp AscI fragment of 138R/5, and the 953-bp AgeI fragment of 253R were separately subcloned into a plasmid containing the wild-type BglII-ScaI fragment, and the resulting plasmids were cotransfected with wild-type HSV-1 DNA. Each of these fragments enabled the viruses to grow in the presence of compound (Table 3), whereas the wild-type BglII-ScaI fragment did not. Therefore, three independent point mutations in the UL6 gene were each sufficient to confer the compound-resistant phenotype.
DISCUSSION
We have presented here two members of a novel class of compounds that are potent inhibitors of HSV-1. These compounds inhibit HSV-1 by interfering with the virus encapsidation process. These inhibitors therefore block HSV replication through an entirely novel mechanism compared to the nucleoside drugs currently used in the clinic to treat HSV infections.
The encapsidation of HSV DNA occurs when preformed viral capsids receive progeny DNA. The replicated viral DNA exists as polygenomic concatamers in the infected cell nucleus. During the process of encapsidation, these concatamers are cleaved in such a way that a DNA molecule of one unit length is packaged into a preformed, immature capsid. When this process goes awry, concatameric, uncleaved viral DNA and immature, empty capsids accumulate. The timing of the events during herpesvirus encapsidation is poorly understood. More knowledge has been acquired on the encapsidation of bacteriophage genomes due to the powerful genetics in those systems. In the double-stranded DNA bacteriophages such as lambda and T4, an encapsidation complex is assembled on the concatameric DNA and the first end of the progeny genome is generated by endonucleolytic cleavage. This protein-DNA complex then binds to the preassembled procapsid (prohead) at the portal vertex; DNA is subsequently packaged and cleaved again. The encapsidation protein complex mainly consists of a heterodimeric terminase and phage structural components such as the portal proteins (5, 7). From genetic analysis, it is known that for HSV, at least seven genes are involved in the encapsidation process, ULs 6, 15, 17, 25, 28, 32, and 33 (1, 2, 8, 20, 21, 25, 26, 35, 41). All seven genes are essential for growth of the virus, and known loss-of-function mutations in most of these genes result in a very similar phenotype: concatameric DNA and empty capsids accumulate. Exactly this phenotype was observed after treatment of HSV-1-infected cells with the compounds described here. To dissect the exact mode of action, we generated HSV-1 virus resistant to the compounds and mapped the location of the resistance-conferring mutation. Analysis of the smallest fragments that conferred resistance to the compounds revealed three independent point mutations in the UL6 ORF, a member of the encapsidation gene group.
For some of the HSV-1 encapsidation gene products, additional information is emerging that allows further dissection of the DNA-packaging process. The UL32 and UL17 proteins might have early roles in the process in that they appear to have an effect on the localization of capsids and capsid proteins to replicative sites (21, 40). The UL15 and UL28 gene products have a potential role in the cleavage of the progeny DNA, based on the following findings: UL15 has homology with gp17, one of the terminase genes of bacteriophage T4 (12), and is the best candidate to date to perform this function for HSV, perhaps in conjunction with the UL28 protein. The involvement of UL28 in DNA cleavage is suggested by the data published by Bogner et al. (6), implicating the HCMV homologue of UL28, HCMV UL56, in DNA-binding and nuclease activity. In addition, there are data which suggest that UL15 and UL28 interact: some forms of UL15 protein products fail to localize to B capsids when the UL28 protein is not expressed (36, 48). This could be explained by recent results from Koslowski et al. (18) that indicate that UL28 can mediate the nuclear import of the UL15 protein. Only one of the encapsidation genes does not seem to play a role in DNA cleavage. HSV-1 defective in UL25 is able to cleave DNA, but the DNA fails to be packaged (22). Also, in cells infected with this UL25-defective virus, there is an increase in empty or A-type capsids, which has been interpreted to indicate that the UL25 protein plays a role in stabilizing the DNA-filled capsids (22). This indicates that the UL25 protein has a role late in the encapsidation process. Apart from being essential for DNA packaging, very little was known about the UL33 protein (2). Just recently, Reynolds et al. (29) reported that the UL33 protein is a 19,000-Da protein that localizes to the cytoplasm and replication compartments in the nucleus, but could not be detected in purified virions or capsids.
The UL6 protein is associated with B and C capsids and is a component of the mature virion (24, 48), and like the UL28 protein, UL6 influences the cellular localization of UL15 proteins (36, 48). By uncovering a new class of encapsidation inhibitors, we may have found a way to analyze the role of the UL6 protein in this process. Three independent point mutations, two close to each other near the C terminus and one close to the N terminus of UL6, each causing an amino acid change in the UL6 ORF (Table 4), can each render HSV-1 resistant to the inhibitors. Two of the mutations are conservative (E121D and A618V) and cause only a change in the size of the amino acid side chain, but one mutation (Q621R) is more drastic, acquiring a charged and bulkier side chain. Each of these mutations conferred the same level of resistance to high concentrations of compound. Limits to compound solubility did not allow us to test whether a combination of these mutations into the same UL6 gene increased the level of resistance. We have also not tested the effect of a combination of these mutations on the ability of the UL6 gene to support viral growth. One can speculate that the two areas of UL6 that carry mutations come together in the three-dimensional structure of the protein to form interaction surfaces with the compounds. Determination of the significance of these mutations will have to wait until more information about the UL6 protein becomes available.
Another class of Herpesviridae inhibitors has recently been reported which have a mechanism of action similar to that of the compounds described herein. Certain benzimidazole ribosides inhibit HCMV effectively through interfering with the encapsidation process (19, 44). These inhibitors also cause the accumulation of immature capsids and uncleaved DNA in the infected cells, but maximal resistance to these inhibitors maps to two different encapsidation genes, UL89 and UL56, homologues of the HSV-1 genes UL15 and UL28, respectively (19). One of these benzamidazole ribosides, BDCRB (43), indeed inhibited HCMV in our assays (IC50, 1.6 μM), but not HSV-1 or -2 (data not shown). Our inhibitors appear to be most potent against HSV-1 and less so against HSV-2 and HCMV.
The level of similarity between HSV-1 UL6 (strain Patton) and its HCMV homologue UL104 (strain AD169) is 21% (data not shown). This might indicate that the actual function of these proteins is conserved but that the points of contact of the proteins with the compounds are probably not. However, the level of similarity between the UL6 gene products from HSV-1 and HSV-2 is 84.5%, yet there is a 10-fold difference in sensitivity to WAY-150138. The amino acids which are mutated in the resistant HSV-1 isolates (Table 4) are conserved in HSV-2 UL6 (by comparison to strain HG52, GenBank accession number Z86099; data not shown). It is possible that the HSV-2 strains that we tested have amino acid substitutions at those positions. Alternatively, the compounds may have a larger interaction interface with UL6 outside the mutated residues, which includes amino acids not conserved between HSV-1 and -2. More detailed knowledge of the molecular interaction between the compounds and the UL6 protein is necessary to understand the decreased potency against HSV-2 and HCMV.
Protein-protein interactions are likely to be crucial for the formation of an encapsidation complex. These interactions can influence the encapsidation process at various levels: (i) the correct subcellular localization of the protein components; (ii) assembly of the encapsidation protein complex; (iii) interaction of the proteins with DNA; (iv) interaction of the encapsidation proteins with the capsid proteins; and (v) stabilization of the DNA-capsid complex. Each of these steps is a viable target for the action of novel inhibitors. Our compounds have demonstrated that DNA packaging is a novel, viable target for chemotherapy of HSV. Further studies are required to determine how the thiourea inhibitors affect UL6 in the encapsidation process.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank J. Upeslacis, R. Visalli, T. Mansour, and J. O'Connell for editing the manuscript and helpful discussions. We thank A. Abramovitz and C. Cerini for viruses and reagents and Megan Thorn for help with the automated assays. Thanks to L. Townsend and J. Drach (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) for the gift of BDCRB.
REFERENCES
- 1.Addison C, Rixon F J, Preston V G. Herpes simplex virus type 1 UL28 gene product is important for the formation of mature capsids. J Gen Virol. 1990;71:2377–2384. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-10-2377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Al-Kobaisi M F, Rixon F J, McDougall I, Preston V G. The herpes simplex virus UL33 gene product is required for the assembly of full capsids. Virology. 1991;180:380–388. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90043-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baines J D, Poon A P W, Rovnak J, Roizman B. The herpes simplex virus UL15 gene encodes two proteins and is required for cleavage of genomic viral DNA. J Virol. 1994;68:8118–8124. doi: 10.1128/jvi.68.12.8118-8124.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Balzarini J, Naesens L, De Clercq E. New antivirals—mechanism of action and resistance development. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1998;1:535–546. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(98)80086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Black L W. DNA packaging and cutting by phage terminases: control in phage T4 by a synaptic mechanism. Bioessays. 1995;17:1025–1030. doi: 10.1002/bies.950171206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bogner E, Radsak K, Stinski M F. The gene product of human cytomegalovirus open reading frame UL56 binds the pac motif and has specific nuclease activity. J Virol. 1998;72:2259–2264. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.3.2259-2264.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Catalano C E, Cue D, Feiss M. Virus DNA packaging: the strategy used by phage λ. Mol Microbiol. 1995;16:1075–1086. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chang Y E, Poon A P, Roizman B. Properties of the protein encoded by the UL32 open reading frame of herpes simplex virus 1. J Virol. 1996;70:3938–3946. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.6.3938-3946.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Christophers J, Clayton J, Craske J, Ward R, Collins P, Trowbridge M, Darby G. Survey of resistance of herpes simplex virus to acyclovir in northwest England. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:868–872. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.4.868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Coen D M. Acyclovir-resistant, pathogenic herpesviruses. Trends Microbiol. 1994;2:481–485. doi: 10.1016/0966-842x(94)90652-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Crute J J, Tsurumi T, Zhu L A, Weller S K, Olivo P D, Chalberg M D, Mocarski E S, Lehmann I R. Herpes simplex virus 1 helicase-primase: a complex of three herpes-encoded gene products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:2186–2189. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.7.2186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Davison A J. Channel catfish virus: a new type of herpesvirus. Virology. 1992;186:9–14. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90056-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Clercq E. Biochemical aspects of the selective antiherpes activity of nucleoside analogues. Biochem Pharmacol. 1984;33:2159–2169. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(84)90649-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feinberg A P, Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983;132:6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Homa F L, Brown J C. Capsid assembly and DNA packaging in herpes simplex virus. Rev Med Virol. 1997;7:107–122. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1654(199707)7:2<107::aid-rmv191>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Isola V J, Eisenberg R J, Siebert G R, Heilman C J, Wilcox W C, Cohen G W. Fine mapping of antigenic site II of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D. J Virol. 1989;63:2325–2334. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.5.2325-2334.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jones T R, Muzithras V P, Gluzman Y. Replacement mutagenesis of the human cytomegalovirus genome: US10 and US11 gene products are nonessential. J Virol. 1991;65:5860–5872. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.11.5860-5872.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Koslowski K M, Shaver P R, Casey II J T, Wilson T, Yamanaka G, Shaeffer A K, Tenney D J, Pederson N E. Physical and functional interactions between the herpes simplex virus UL15 and UL28 DNA cleavage and packaging proteins. J Virol. 1999;73:1704–1707. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.2.1704-1707.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Krosky P M, Underwood M R, Turk S R, Feng K W, Jain R K, Ptak R G, Westerman A C, Biron K K, Townsend L B, Drach J C. Resistance of human cytomegalovirus to benzimidazole ribonucleosides maps to two open reading frames, UL89 and UL56. J Virol. 1998;72:4721–4728. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.6.4721-4728.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lamberti C, Weller S K. The herpes simplex virus type 1 UL6 protein is essential for cleavage and packaging but not for genomic inversion. Virology. 1996;226:403–407. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lamberti C, Weller S K. The herpes simplex virus type 1 cleavage/packaging protein, UL32, is involved in efficient localization of capsids to replication compartments. J Virol. 1998;72:2463–2473. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.3.2463-2473.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McNab A R, Desai P, Person S, Roof L L, Thomsen D R, Newcomb W W, Brown J C, Homa F L. The product of the herpes simplex virus type 1 UL25 gene is required for encapsidation but not for cleavage of replicated viral DNA. J Virol. 1998;72:1060–1070. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.2.1060-1070.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mohr I, Gluzman Y. A herpesvirus genetic element which affects translation in the absence of the viral GADD34 function. EMBO J. 1996;15:4759–4766. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Patel A H, MacClean J B. The product of the UL6 gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 is associated with virus capsids. Virology. 1995;206:465–478. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(95)80062-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Patel A H, Rixon F J, Cunningham C, Davison A J. Isolation and characterization of herpes simplex virus type 1 mutants defective in the UL6 gene. Virology. 1996;217:111–123. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Poon A P W, Roizman B. Characterization of a temperature-sensitive mutant of the UL15 open reading frame of herpes simplex virus 1. J Virol. 1993;67:4497–4503. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.8.4497-4503.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pottage J C, Kessler H A. Herpes simplex virus resistance to acyclovir: clinical relevance. Infect Agents Dis. 1995;4:115–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Puthavathana P, Kanyok R, Horthongkham N, Roongpisuthipong A. Prevalence of herpes simplex virus infection in patients suspected of genital herpes and virus typing by type specific fluorescent monoclonal antibodies. J Med Assoc Thailand. 1998;81:260–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Reynolds A E, Fan Y, Baines J D. Characterization of the UL33 gene product of herpes simplex virus. Virology. 2000;266:310–318. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.0090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reynolds E S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Roizman B. The family of herpesviridae. In: Roizman B, Whitley R J, Lopez C, editors. The human herpesviruses. New York, N.Y: Raven Press, Ltd.; 1993. pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roizman B, Sears A E. Herpes simplex viruses and their replication. In: Roizman B, Whitley R J, Lopez C, editors. The human herpesviruses. New York, N.Y: Raven Press; 1993. pp. 11–68. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rosenthal L J, Crutchfield D B, Panitz P J, Clanton D J. Isolation of human cytomegalovirus DNA from infected cells. Intervirology. 1983;19:113–120. doi: 10.1159/000149345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Russell R J, Kudler L, Miller R H, Hyman R W. Stability of the cloned “joint region” of herpes simplex virus DNA. Intervirology. 1982;18:98–104. doi: 10.1159/000149312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Salmon B, Cunningham C, Davison A J, Harris W J, Baines J D. The herpes simplex virus type 1 U(L)17 gene encodes virion tegument proteins that are required for cleavage and packaging of viral DNA. J Virol. 1998;72:3779–3788. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.5.3779-3788.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Salmon B, Baines J D. Herpes simplex virus DNA cleavage and packaging: association of multiple forms of UL15-encoded proteins with B capsids requires at least the UL6, UL17, and UL28 genes. J Virol. 1998;72:3045–3050. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.4.3045-3050.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sambrook J, Fritsch E M, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schmitt J, Keil G M. Identification and characterization of the bovine herpesvirus 1 UL7 gene and gene product, which are not essential for virus replication in cell culture. J Virol. 1996;70:1091–1099. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.2.1091-1099.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Slomka M J, Emery L, Munday P E, Moulsdale M, Brown D W. A comparison of PCR with virus isolation and direct antigen detection for diagnosis and typing of genital herpes. J Med Virol. 1998;55:177–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Taus N S, Salmon B, Baines J D. The herpes simplex virus 1 UL17 gene is required for localization of capsids and major and minor capsid proteins to intranuclear sites where viral DNA is cleaved and packaged. Virology. 1998;252:115–125. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tengelsen L A, Pederson N E, Shaver P R, Wathen M W, Homa F L. Herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA cleavage and encapsidation require the product of the UL28 gene: isolation and characterization of two UL28 deletion mutants. J Virol. 1993;67:3470–3480. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.6.3470-3480.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tenney D J, Hurlburt W W, Micheletti P A, Bifano M, Hamatake R K. The UL8 component of the herpes simplex virus helicase-primase complex stimulates primer synthesis by a subassembly of the UL5 and UL52 components. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:5030–5035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Townsend L B, Devivar R V, Turk S R, Nassiri R, Drach J C. Design, synthesis, and antiviral activity of certain 2,5,6-trihalo-1-(β-d-ribofuranosyl)benzimidazoles. J Med Chem. 1995;38:4098–4105. doi: 10.1021/jm00020a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Underwood M R, Harvey R J, Stanat S C, Hemphill M L, Miller T, Drach J C, Towndsend L B, Biron K K. Inhibition of human cytomegalovirus DNA maturation by a benzamidazole ribonucleoside is mediated through the UL89 gene product. J Virol. 1998;72:717–725. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.1.717-725.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Visalli R J, Brandt C R. The HSV-1 UL45 gene product is not required for growth in Vero cells. Virology. 1991;185:419–423. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90790-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Weller S K, Aschman D P, Sacks W R, Coen D M, Schaffer P A. Genetic analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants of HSV-1: the combined use of complementation and physical mapping for cistron assignment. Virology. 1983;130:290–305. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(83)90084-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Whitley R J, Gnann J W., Jr . The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of herpes simplex virus infection. In: Roizman B, Whitley R J, Lopez C, editors. The human herpesviruses. New York, N.Y: Raven Press, Ltd.; 1993. pp. 329–348. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yu D, Weller S K. Herpes simplex virus type 1 cleavage and packaging proteins UL15 and UL28 are associated with B but not C capsids during packaging. J Virol. 1998;72:7428–7439. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.9.7428-7439.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






