Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1992 Dec;47(12):1015–1018. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.12.1015

Notification of tuberculosis: how many cases are never reported?

C D Sheldon 1, K King 1, H Cock 1, P Wilkinson 1, N C Barnes 1
PMCID: PMC1021092  PMID: 1494763

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Notification of tuberculosis is essential for local contact tracing and for assessing the national incidence of tuberculosis. The accuracy of notification figures is uncertain. This study examined the notification rates of all patients diagnosed as having tuberculosis at two hospitals in the East End of London over five years. METHODS: In a retrospective survey of all patients aged 16 years or more presenting with tuberculosis to the London Chest Hospital or the Royal London Hospital from 1 January 1985 to 31 December 1989, cases of tuberculosis were identified from microbiology and histology records, statutory notifications, necropsy reports, coroners' records, hospital activity data, and death certificates. Clinical data were obtained from case notes and notification was determined from the local authority notification lists. RESULTS: Six hundred and nine adult patients with tuberculosis were identified. Notes were available for 580 cases (95%), of which 426 (73%) had been notified. The proportion of cases notified varied according to the specialty of the clinician in charge of the patient at diagnosis. Patients with a past history of tuberculosis and those who died within one year were less likely to have had their tuberculosis notified. Age, race, and lack of microbial or histological confirmation of diagnosis did not influence the proportion of cases notified. One hundred and eighty five patients had smear positive sputum, but 25 of these cases (14%) were not notified. Eighty five patients who had presented with pulmonary tuberculosis did not have their disease notified; 20 (24%) had smear positive sputum. CONCLUSIONS: Many cases of tuberculosis are not notified (27%). Fourteen per cent of all sputum smear positive cases of tuberculosis were not notified, and these patients are a considerable public health risk. The true incidence of tuberculosis in the area studied is at least one third higher than current notification figures suggest.

Full text

PDF
1015

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradley B. L., Kerr K. M., Leitch A. G., Lamb D. Notification of tuberculosis: can the pathologist help? BMJ. 1988 Sep 3;297(6648):595–595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6648.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Capewell S., Leitch A. G. The value of contact procedures for tuberculosis in Edinburgh. Br J Dis Chest. 1984 Oct;78(4):317–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cartwright K. A., Stuart J. M., Noah N. D. An outbreak of meningococcal disease in Gloucestershire. Lancet. 1986 Sep 6;2(8506):558–561. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90124-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chemotherapy and management of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: recommendations of the Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Thorax. 1990 May;45(5):403–408. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.5.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davies P. D., Darbyshire J., Nunn A. J., Byfield S. P., Fox W., Citron K. M., Raynes R. H. Ambiguities and inaccuracies in the notification system for tuberculosis in England and Wales. Community Med. 1981 May;3(2):108–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harvey I. Infectious disease notification--a neglected legal requirement. Health Trends. 1991;23(2):73–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkinson D. Whooping cough: what proportion of cases is notified in an epidemic? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jul 16;287(6386):185–186. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6386.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marier R. The reporting of communicable diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Jun;105(6):587–590. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nunn A. J., Darbyshire J. H., Fox W., Johnson D. A., Springett V. H. Changes in annual tuberculosis notification rates between 1978/79 and 1983 for the population of Indian subcontinent ethnic origin resident in England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Dec;40(4):357–363. doi: 10.1136/jech.40.4.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shanks N. J., Lambourne A., Kuhaymi R. A., Humphries M., Sanford J. R. A new approach to tuberculosis notification. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Dec;38(4):331–334. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.4.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tizes R., Hayden C., Tizes C. W. The source of notification in tuberculosis. Am J Public Health. 1974 Aug;64(8):809–811. doi: 10.2105/ajph.64.8.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Voss S. How much do doctors know about the notification of infectious diseases? BMJ. 1992 Mar 21;304(6829):755–755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6829.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES