Abstract
BACKGROUND--The measurement of effective alveolar carbon dioxide tension (PA-CO2eff) is still a matter of debate. It has, however, become common practice to use arterial instead of alveolar CO2 tension for computing alveolar oxygen tension (PAO2) and physiological dead space, not only in normal subjects but also in patients. The purpose of this study was to estimate alveolar CO2 tension during spontaneous breathing with a new bedside technique which is simple and non-invasive, and to compare these values with arterial CO2 tension measured in normal subjects and patients with chronic airways obstruction. METHODS--The subjects breathed quietly through the equipment assembly (mouthpiece, monitoring ring, Fleisch transducer head) connected to a pneumotachograph and a fast response infrared CO2 analyser. The method is a computerised calculation of the volume weighted effective alveolar CO2 tension obtained from the simultaneously recorded expiratory flow and CO2 concentration versus time curves. An arterial blood sample was taken to measure PaCO2 for comparison during the study. RESULTS--The results showed a mean difference (PACO2eff-PaCO2) of -0.205 kPa in 20 normal subjects and -0.460 kPa in 46 patients. The 95% confidence interval of the bias was -0.029 to -0.379 kPa in normal subjects and -0.213 to -0.707 kPa in patients. The limits of agreement between PACO2eff and PaCO2 were 0.526 to -0.935 in normal subjects and 1.170 to -2.088 in patients. CONCLUSIONS--The volume weighted effective alveolar PCO2 in normal subjects and patients with chronic airways obstruction is lower than the arterial PCO2 and is recommended as a better estimate in the classical equations for estimating dead space and intrapulmonary shunt.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ASMUSSEN E., NIELSEN M. Physiological dead space and alveolar gas pressures at rest and during muscular exercise. Acta Physiol Scand. 1956 Dec 29;38(1):1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1957.tb00169.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FOWLER W. S. Lung function studies; uneven pulmonary ventilation in normal subjects and in patients with pulmonary disease. J Appl Physiol. 1949 Dec;2(6):283–299. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1949.2.6.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hugh-Jones P., Barter C. E., Hime J. M., Rusbridge M. M. Dead space and tidal volume of the giraffe compared with some other mammals. Respir Physiol. 1978 Oct;35(1):53–58. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(78)90040-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jordanoglou J., Tatsis G., Danos J., Gougoulakis S., Orfanidou D., Gaga M. Alveolar partial pressures of carbon dioxide and oxygen measured by a helium washout technique. Thorax. 1990 Jul;45(7):520–524. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.7.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luft U. C., Loeppky J. A., Mostyn E. M. Mean alveolar gases and alveolar-arterial gradients in pulmonary patients. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Mar;46(3):534–540. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.3.534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shykoff B. E., Swanson H. T. A model-free method for mass spectrometer response correction. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1987 Nov;63(5):2148–2153. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.5.2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]