Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1995 Jun;50(6):635–638. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.6.635

Differences in aerosol output and airways responsiveness between the DeVilbiss 40 and 45 hand held nebulisers.

C J Hartley-Sharpe 1, H Booth 1, D P Johns 1, E H Walters 1
PMCID: PMC1021263  PMID: 7638805

Abstract

BACKGROUND--The DeVilbiss 40 glass hand held nebulisers have been widely used for airways responsiveness testing in epidemiological surveys of asthma. These nebulisers have been superseded in some recent studies by the DeVilbiss 45 plastic hand held nebulisers with the assumption that they are interchangeable. This study compared the aerosol outputs of the DeVilbiss 40 and DeVilbiss 45 nebulisers and investigated whether there was any difference in the in vivo measurements of airways responsiveness when using the two nebuliser types. METHODS--The aerosol output of six DeVilbiss 40 and six DeVilbiss 45 nebulisers was calculated by weight loss per actuation, the usual method of calibrating nebuliser output, and compared with the true amount of aerosol obtained measured by a flouride tracer technique. Airways responsiveness was measured twice in 13 asthmatic patients under identical conditions by the Yan protocol using DeVilbiss 40 and 45 nebulisers in random order. RESULTS--Weight loss overestimated the true aerosol output of both types of nebulisers. Weight loss was similar for the DeVilbiss 40 and 45 nebulisers but the true aerosol output of the DeVilbiss 45 was nearly twice that of the DeVilbiss 40 nebuliser. The geometric mean PD20 values with the DeVilbiss 40 nebuliser was a mean 1.7 doubling doses of histamine higher than that obtained with the DeVilbiss 45 nebuliser. CONCLUSIONS--The DeVilbiss 40 and 45 nebulisers should not be used interchangeably for airways responsiveness testing merely because their outputs based on weight loss are similar. Artefactual differences in the prevalence rates of airways responsiveness could occur in longitudinal studies if a change was inadvertently made from using DeVilbiss 40 to DeVilbiss 45 nebulisers.

Full text

PDF
635

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Britton J., Mortagy A., Tattersfield A. Histamine challenge testing: comparison of three methods. Thorax. 1986 Feb;41(2):128–132. doi: 10.1136/thx.41.2.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burney P. G., Britton J. R., Chinn S., Tattersfield A. E., Papacosta A. O., Kelson M. C., Anderson F., Corfield D. R. Descriptive epidemiology of bronchial reactivity in an adult population: results from a community study. Thorax. 1987 Jan;42(1):38–44. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.1.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan K. N., Clay M. M., Silverman M. Output characteristics of DeVilbiss No. 40 hand-held jet nebulizers. Eur Respir J. 1990 Nov;3(10):1197–1201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan K. N., Clay M. M., Silverman M. Output characteristics of DeVilbiss No. 40 hand-held jet nebulizers. Eur Respir J. 1990 Nov;3(10):1197–1201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clifford R. D., Radford M., Howell J. B., Holgate S. T. Prevalence of atopy and range of bronchial response to methacholine in 7 and 11 year old schoolchildren. Arch Dis Child. 1989 Aug;64(8):1126–1132. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.8.1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cockcroft D. W., Hurst T. S., Gore B. P. Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests. Chest. 1989 Sep;96(3):505–508. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.3.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dennis J. H., Avery A. J., Walters E. H., Hendrick D. J. Calibration of aerosol output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for epidemiological studies. Eur Respir J. 1992 Nov;5(10):1279–1282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dennis J. H., Stenton S. C., Beach J. R., Avery A. J., Walters E. H., Hendrick D. J. Jet and ultrasonic nebuliser output: use of a new method for direct measurement of aerosol output. Thorax. 1990 Oct;45(10):728–732. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.10.728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jenkins C. R., Woolcock A. J. Effect of prednisone and beclomethasone dipropionate on airway responsiveness in asthma: a comparative study. Thorax. 1988 May;43(5):378–384. doi: 10.1136/thx.43.5.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Knox A. J., Wisniewski A., Cooper S., Tattersfield A. E. A comparison of the Yan and a dosimeter method for methacholine challenge in experienced and inexperienced subjects. Eur Respir J. 1991 Apr;4(4):497–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kraan J., Koëter G. H., vd Mark T. W., Sluiter H. J., de Vries K. Changes in bronchial hyperreactivity induced by 4 weeks of treatment with antiasthmatic drugs in patients with allergic asthma: a comparison between budesonide and terbutaline. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1985 Oct;76(4):628–636. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(85)90786-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Connor G., Sparrow D., Taylor D., Segal M., Weiss S. Analysis of dose-response curves to methacholine. An approach suitable for population studies. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Dec;136(6):1412–1417. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.6.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peat J. K., Haby M., Spijker J., Berry G., Woolcock A. J. Prevalence of asthma in adults in Busselton, Western Australia. BMJ. 1992 Nov 28;305(6865):1326–1329. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6865.1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peat J. K., Salome C. M., Berry G., Woolcock A. J. Relation of dose-response slope to respiratory symptoms in a population of Australian schoolchildren. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Sep;144(3 Pt 1):663–667. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.3_Pt_1.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peat J. K., Woolcock A. J. Sensitivity to common allergens: relation to respiratory symptoms and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in children from three different climatic areas of Australia. Clin Exp Allergy. 1991 Sep;21(5):573–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1991.tb00849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peat J. K., van den Berg R. H., Green W. F., Mellis C. M., Leeder S. R., Woolcock A. J. Changing prevalence of asthma in Australian children. BMJ. 1994 Jun 18;308(6944):1591–1596. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6944.1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ryan G., Dolovich M. B., Obminski G., Cockcroft D. W., Juniper E., Hargreave F. E., Newhouse M. T. Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: influence of nebulizer output, particle size, and method of inhalation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981 Feb;67(2):156–161. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sterk P. J., Fabbri L. M., Quanjer P. H., Cockcroft D. W., O'Byrne P. M., Anderson S. D., Juniper E. F., Malo J. L. Airway responsiveness. Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993 Mar;16:53–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Toelle B. G., Peat J. K., Salome C. M., Mellis C. M., Woolcock A. J. Toward a definition of asthma for epidemiology. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Sep;146(3):633–637. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.3.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yan K., Salome C., Woolcock A. J. Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness. Thorax. 1983 Oct;38(10):760–765. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.10.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES