Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Apr 13;53(6):1220–1222. doi: 10.1007/s00247-023-05661-2

Correction to: Diversity in radiology: the right thing to do, the smart thing to do

Theodore R Hall 1,✉, Kathleen Brown 2
PMCID: PMC10212821  PMID: 37046099

Correction to: Pediatric Radiology (2022) 52:1711–1718

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05416-5

A corrected version of Table 1 is provided. The following corrections have been made:

  • “Diagnostic Radiology Residents” Men – 3,459 (73.5)

  • “Diagnostic Radiology Residents” Women – 1,244 (26.5)

  • “Diagnostic Radiology Residents” Total Non-duplicated – 4,703

  • “U.S. Medical Graduates” Total Non-duplicated – 20,390

  • “Diagnostic Radiology Applicants” Total Non-duplicated – 2,405

Table 1.

2020 demographic distribution by gender, Hispanic ethnicity and race of the U.S. population, U.S. medical school graduates, diagnostic radiology applicants, residents, practicing physicians and faculty members

Gender Ethnicity Race Total
Non-duplicated
Group Men Women Hispanic Non-Hispanic White Asian Black AI/AN/NH/PI Multi-race
2020 U.S.Census 163.2 M (49.2) 168.6 M (50.8) 60.7 M (18.5) 197.2 M (60.1) 250.4 M (76.3) 19.4 M (5.9) 44.0 M (13.4) 4.9 M (1.5) 9.2 M (2.8) 328,239,523
U.S.medical school graduates 10,280 (50.4) 10,110 (49.5) 1,063 (5.3) 504 (2.5) 10,897 (54.6) 4,299 (21.6) 1,238 (6.2) 47 (0.3) 1,598 (8.0) 20,390
Diagnostic radiology applicantsa 1,743 (72.5) 662 (27.5) 171 (8.1) 254 (12.1) 986 (47.1) 528 (25.2) 132 (6.3) 21 (1.0) 2,405
Diagnostic radiology residentsb 3,459 (73.5) 1,244 (26.5) 302 (6.9) 222 (5.0) 2,583 (59.2) 1,190 (27.8) 173 (3.9) 8 (0.2) 187 (4.3) 4,703
Diagnostic radiology practicing physicians 20,595 (73.5) 7,413 (26.5) 1,106 (4.4) 480 (1.9) 18,252 (73.0) 4,240 (16.9) 658 (2.6) 75 (0.3) 187 (0.7) 28,008
Diagnostic radiology facultyc 7,161 (70.1) 3,052 (29.9) 239 (2.5) 216 (2.2) 5,915 (62.0) 2,718 (28.5) 228 (2.3) 21 (0.2) 198 (2.0) 10,213

Based on comparison of the 2010 and 2020 U.S. censuses, numbers in bold represent increases, italics represent declines; percentages for both are in parentheses for the U.S. population, U.S. medical school graduates, radiology applicants, residents, practicing physicians and radiology faculty members (Comparison of data abstracted from [5])

AI/AN/NH/PI American Indian/Alaskan native/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, M million

a Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) data include other race/ethnicity and unknown race/ethnicity, and do not have a multi-race designation

b Includes diagnostic radiology and interventional-radiology-integrated residents with International Medical Graduate (IMG) pathway, U.S. and Canadian medical graduates and U.S. doctor of osteopathic medicine graduates

c Number of full-time faculty at all U.S. medical schools as of Dec. 31, 2020

Of note, a comparison of this 2020 data with the 2010 data published by Chapman et al. [5] shows that compared to the 2010 demographic data (below) there was no significant change in the number or percentage of men and women in DR and IR residency training programs:

  • Men – 3,271 (72.2)

  • Women – 1,260 (27.8)

  • Total Non-duplicated – 4,531

On page 1714 within the paragraph beginning with “By the 2020 U.S. Census. Women…”, the correct percentage for the women who were diagnostic radiology residents is 26.5% (instead of 35.9%). The point being made about underrepresentation remains valid.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Articles from Pediatric Radiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES