Skip to main content
Open Veterinary Journal logoLink to Open Veterinary Journal
. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):407–418. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i4.2

Results of the eighteenth winter waterbird census in Libya in 2022

Khaled Etayeb 1,2,3,*, Ashraf Galidana 2, Ali Berbash 2,4, Adulnasser Eisa 2, Ali Al-kordi 2, Elias Al-Helali 2, Mahmoud Abuhajar 2, Abdulati Alswyeb 5, Hussien Abdulqader 4,5, Naders Azabi 6, Nader Ghriba 6, Saleh Deryaq 4,7, Abdulhafiz Algnaien 4, Saleh Buirzayqah 8, Murad Buijlayyil 8, Muhanad Bujazlya 4, Abdulmajid Hamhoom 3, Abdulmoula Hamza 9, Ehab Sharif 3,10, Abdunaser Dayhum 3,10, Abdulwahab Kammon 3,10, Ibrahim Eldaghayes 3,10
PMCID: PMC10219821  PMID: 37251270

Abstract

Background:

Libyan wetlands are diverse; the coastline of Libya, in particular, has different kinds of wetlands, such as salt marshes, bays, lakes, lagoons, and islands. These varieties in habitats provide good shelters and foraging sites for migratory birds during their journeys between Eurasia and Africa. Since the beginning of the Libyan winter census of waterbirds International waterbirds census (Libya IWC) in 2005, which continued regularly until 2012, it has had relatively the same performance in the number of covered sites. However, since 2013, due to the security situation that Libya has experienced due to wars and conflict, which negatively affected the quality of the IWC in Libya, the number of sites has dramatically decreased, reaching only six locations during the middle of the previous decade.

Aim:

The IWC 2022 aimed to count the birds along the Libyan coast from January 10 to 29.

Methods:

The census activities were conducted from dawn to dusk during the study period by using high-quality Telescopes, binoculars, and digital cameras for the documentation. Point transects method was used to cover the sites.

Results:

The results of this year showed that a total of 64 sites were covered, and 68 species of waterbirds were counted, with an abundance of 61,850 individuals. During the census period, a total of 52 non-waterbird species found in Wetlands were recorded, and the number of individuals was 14,836 birds. A total of 18 threatened species were observed during this survey, 12 of them are mentioned in the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, and nine species are mentioned in the regional activities center of specially protected areas annex II as threatened in the Mediterranean, where the species; Larus audouinii (Payraudeau, 1826), Larus genei (Breme, 1839), and Puffinus yelkouan (Acerbi, 1827) are mentioned in both of them.

Conclusion:

The lack of the number of ornithologists and bird watchers is still one of the factors affecting the quality of the IWC in Libya, as well as lack of funding remains an important factor that plays a major role in the success of the waterbirds census.

Keywords: International waterbird census, Sites, Threatened species, Libya

Introduction

Libyan wetlands are diverse, from desert oases, fresh and saltwater springs, salt marshes, coastal lagoons, artificial reservoirs, and damps. In general, the majorities of wetlands in Libya are shallow salt marshes, dry or semi-dry most of the year, and sometimes connected to the sea (Sobkha) (Smart et al., 2006; EGA-RAC/SPA, 2012). The coastline of Libya, in particular, has different kinds of wetlands, such as salt marshes, bays, lakes, lagoons, and islands (Defos du Rau et al., 2003). These varieties in habitats provide good shelters and foraging sites for migratory birds during their journey from Europe and Asia to Africa and their journey back returns. Furthermore, some of these sites provide staging and nesting grounds for some species. However, with its dry climate, Libya is perceived as having relatively few wetlands and waterbirds. It is also, in terms of biodiversity one of the least known among Mediterranean countries, despite the published reports and papers (Azafzaf et al., 2005, 2006; Smart et al., 2006; Etayeb et al., 2007, 2012; EGA-RAC/SPA, 2012; Bourass et al., 2013).

The winter census of waterbirds in Libya began in 2005; it has continued regularly during January of each year in the framework of the International Waterbirds Census (IWC).

The IWC in Libya was conducted by local specialists and some ornithologists from outside the country (Tunisia, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom); this team worked from 2005 to 2011 under the supervision of the Environment General Authority (currently the Libyan Ministry of Environment) in cooperation with the Regional activities Center of Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) and the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian migratory waterbirds, in coordination with Wetlands International. The first outputs of this cooperation were issued in two reports on wintering waterbirds in Libya (Azafzaf et al., 2005, 2006). Then these results were published in a scientific paper (Smart et al., 2006). Moreover, the census of wintering waterbirds in Libya continued until 2010, when the Atlas of wintering waterbirds of Libya was published (EGA-RAC/SPA, 2012). Then the results of the 2011 survey were published; it was the last year covering all the sites in Libya, where the total number was 84 (Bourass et al., 2013).

Libya has experienced widespread security, which strongly affected the IWC. In 2012, about half of the sites were covered than in the previous year (Etayeb et al., 2012). In 2013, coordinated waterbird counts between North African countries noticed a limited coverage of the sites where 10 important wetlands were skipped due to security situations (Sayoud et al., 2017). From the year 2013 until 2021, the waterbirds census activities have continued were conducted by a team from the Libyan society of birds (LSB) with support from Mediterranean waterbird network in collaboration with Bisida Society and Bado Society in Zwara city, the Libyan Organization for Conservation of Nature (LOCN) and the Environment General Authority; despite the obstacles, security problems and unstable country situation that negatively affected the program. Consequently, the number of sites was at most 34; the least was only six sites around Tripoli in 2015. Although there was a slight improvement in the following years until 2021, this improvement did not lead to reaching the number of surveyed sites during the period from 2005 to 2011. However, the diversity and abundance of waterbirds and non-waterbirds were recorded; the results were undoubtedly affected by the inconvenient circumstances experienced by the winter census for birds in Libya (Table 1).

Table 1. Results of IWC in Libya from 2005 to 2021.

Year Waterbirds Waterbird sp. Non-waterbirds Non-waterbird sp. Covered sites Period
2005 29,996 79 30,160 74 65 3–17 Jan.
2006 51,698 85 146,621 60 56 19–31 Jan.
2007 39,303 92 39,130 69 43 3–15 Feb.
2008 53,632 79 13,378 64 50 20–31 Jan.
2009 40,369 65 13,047 55 49 26 Jan – 7 Feb.
2010 51,652 86 60,000 60 94 24 Jan – 3 Feb.
2011 34,842 81 506,155 67 84 29 Jan – 13 Feb.
2012 29,258 66 2,110 27 42 3 Jan – 1 Feb.
2013 5,308 46 0 0 16 19 Jan – 9 Feb.
2014 7,761 58 0 0 12 1–12 Jan.
2015 1,930 37 90 8 6 20–24 Jan.
2016 5,040 47 544 15 10 2–7 Jan.
2017 10,488 64 830 25 29 15–22 Jan.
2018 24,815 54 751,420 23 34 11–31 Jan.
2019 25,480 63 1,872 22 32 10–30 Jan.
2020 14,205 46 6,104 19 12 9–25 Jan.
2021 17,091 60 2,002,622 36 32 14–31 Jan.

This paper aims to present the results of the 18th IWC in Libya, which was conducted in January 2022 along the Libyan coastline under the supervision of the LSB in collaboration with the Libyan Ministry of Environment, National Research Center for Tropical and Transboundary Diseases and NGOs (LOCN, Bisida and Alhaya Organization for Protection of Wildlife and Marine Organisms).

Material and Methods

The winter census of waterbirds in Libya for 2022 was conducted from 10 to 29 January. The team covered all wetlands and waterbirds sites along the Libyan coast from Ras Jdair in the west to Tobruk in the east (Fig. 1). The census usually starts from early morning until evening. Sometimes to maintain the time, the team was split into two groups to cover the sites located at the same range and to avoid repeated counting of the same birds. The census was carried out using six binoculars, nine telescopes, and digital cameras for documentation. In addition, the point transects method (standing at a specific site and counting birds) was used to cover the areas (Volpato et al., 2009).

Fig. 1. Covered sites during the IWC 2022.

Fig. 1.

To examine the population trend of waterbirds wintering in Libya from 2005 to 2022, the living planet index (LPI) was used. The use of LPI was started in 1997 by the World Wide Fund for Nature to investigate the changes in global biodiversity over time, especially for measuring the average trends of vertebrate populations (Loh et al., 2005). In this paper, the Chain method was used to calculate the index, where the logarithm of the ratio of the population of each pair of years was calculated using the formula:

dt=log(Nt/Nt1)

Where N= population size and t= years (time). The specific values of dt were generated for nt as:

n t

dt=1Σdit

nt i=1

Finally, the index for waterbird populations in Libyan wetlands in a standard year t was calculated as:

d t

It = It-1 10

Results

The results of the winter survey of birds for 2022 showed that the total number of birds counted was 76,686 individuals, and the diversity of species reached 120 for the aquatic and non-aquatic birds. The abundance of waterbirds was 61,850 individuals belonging to 68 species classified under 18 families (Table 2). The number of species has varied among the families (1–17), where the family Scolopacidae is the most diverse, followed by the family Anatidae with 11 species. There are nine families represented by only one species each (Fig. 2). The abundance of waterbirds among the families was significantly varied, where the most considerable abundance was for the family Laridae (51,412) with a percentage of approximately 85%, while in some families, the number did not exceed one or two individuals. In terms of the diversity of species among the sites, it ranged from 0 to 27, where the largest assortment was in Farwa, and the highest abundance was in Sabkhat Qanfudhah with a total of 35,169 individuals (Table 3).

Table 2. Waterbirds and non-waterbirds were recorded in Jan. 2022 in Libya.

Family No. Common name Binomial name Count
Anatidae 1 Common shelduck Tadorna tadorna (Linnaeus, 1758) 176
2 Common pochard Aythya ferina (Linnaeus, 1758) 5
3 Ferruginous duck Aythya nyroca (Güldenstadt, 1770) 60
4 Red-breasted merganser Mergus serrator (Linnaeus, 1758) 3
5 Gadwall Mareca strepera (Linnaeus, 1758) 3
6 Northern shoveler Spatula clypeata (Linnaeus, 1758) 231
7 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos (Linnaeus, 1758) 2
8 Northern pintail Anas acuta (Linnaeus, 1758) 5
9 Garganey Spatula querquedula (Linnaeus, 1758) 1
10 Eurasian teal Anas crecca (Linnaeus, 1758) 95
11 Marbled teal Marmaronetta angustirostris (Ménétrés, 1832) 8
Procellariidae 12 Yelkouan shearwater Puffinus yelkouan (Acerbi, 1827) 3
Podicipedidae 13 Little grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis (Pallas, 1764) 148
14 Great crested grebe Podiceps cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758) 103
15 Black-necked grebe Podiceps nigricollis (Brehm, 1831) 98
Phoenicopteridae 16 Greater flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus (Pallas, 1811) 352
Ciconiidae 17 White stork Ciconia ciconia (Linnaeus, 1758) 35
Threskiornithidae 18 Glossy ibis Plegadis falcinellus (Linnaeus, 1766) 75
19 Eurasian spoonbill Platalea leucorodia (Linnaeus, 1758) 30
Ardeidae 20 Squacco heron Ardeola ralloides (Scopoli, 1769) 1
21 Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis (Linnaeus, 1758) 3,705
22 Little egret Egretta garzetta (Linnaeus, 1766) 137
23 Great white egret Ardea alba (Linnaeus, 1758) 27
24 Grey heron Ardea cinerea (Linnaeus, 1758) 118
Sulidae 25 Northern gannet Morus bassanus (Linnaeus, 1758) 41
Phalacrocoracidae 26 Great cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo (Linnaeus, 1758) 1,139
27 European shag Gulosus aristotelis (Linnaeus, 1761) 8
Rallidae 28 Common moorhen Gallinula chloropus (Linnaeus, 1758) 46
29 Common coot Fulica atra (Linnaeus, 1758) 151
Gruidae 30 Common crane Grus grus (Linnaeus, 1758) 2
Haematopodidae 31 Eurasian oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus (Linnaeus, 1758) 34
Recurvirostridae 32 Black-winged stilt Himantopus himantopus (Linnaeus, 1758) 91
Charadriidae 33 Little ringed plover Charadrius dubius (Scopoli, 1786) 6
34 Common ringed plover Charadrius hiaticula (Linnaeus, 1758) 52
35 Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus (Linnaeus, 1758) 592
36 Eurasian golden plover Pluvialis apricaria (Linnaeus, 1758) 52
37 Grey plover Pluvialis squatarola (Linnaeus, 1758) 49
Scolopacidae 38 Sanderling Calidris alba (Pallas, 1764) 20
39 Little stint Calidris minuta (Leisler, 1812) 224
40 Temminck's stint Calidris temminckii (Leisler, 1812) 3
41 Curlew sandpiper Calidris ferruginea (Pontoppidan, 1763) 7
42 Dunlin Calidris alpina (Linnaeus, 1758) 1,618
43 Ruff Calidris pugnax (Linnaeus, 1758) 34
44 Common snipe Gallinago gallinago (Linnaeus, 1758) 16
45 Bar-tailed godwit Limosa lapponica (Linnaeus, 1758) 1
46 Eurasian curlew Numenius arquata (Linnaeus, 1758) 16
47 Common sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos (Linnaeus, 1758) 23
48 Green sandpiper Tringa ochropus (Linnaeus, 1758) 16
49 Spotted redshank Tringa erythropus (Pallas, 1764) 4
50 Common greenshank Tringa nebularia (Gunnerus, 1767) 6
51 Marsh sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis (Bechstein, 1803) 6
52 Wood sandpiper Tringa glareola (Linnaeus, 1758) 6
53 Common redshank Tringa totanus (Linnaeus, 1758) 148
54 Ruddy turnstone Arenaria interpres (Linnaeus, 1758) 15
Laridae 55 Slender-billed gull Chroicocephalus genei (Breme, 1839) 2,169
56 Black-headed gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus (Linnaeus, 1766) 24,194
57 Little gull Hydrocoloeus minutus (Pallas, 1776) 46
58 Mediterranean gull Ichthyaetus melanocephalus (Temminck, 1820) 5,026
59 Audouin's gull Ichthyaetus audouinii (Payraudeau, 1826) 21
60 Lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus (Linnaeus, 1758) 9,059
61 Yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis (Naumann, 1840) 10,897
62 Great black-backed gull Larus marinus (Linnaeus, 1758) 3
63 Caspian tern Hydroprogne caspia (Pallas, 1770) 66
64 Black tern Chlidonias niger (Linnaeus, 1758) 5
65 Sandwich tern Thalasseus sandvicensis (Latham, 1787) 502
66 Lesser crested tern Thalasseus bengalensis (Lesson, 1831) 7
Stercorariidae 67 Parasitic jaeger (Arctic Skua) Stercorarius parasiticus (Linnaeus, 1758) 2
Alcedinidae 68 Common kingfisher Alcedo atthis (Linnaeus, 1758) 6
Phasianidae 69 Barbary partridge Alectoris Barbara (Bonnaterre, 1791) 2
Accipitridae 70 Black kite Milvus migrans (Boddaert, 1783) 1
71 Western marsh-harrier Circus aeruginosus (Linnaeus, 1758) 26
72 Hen harrier Circus cyaneus (Linnaeus, 1766) 1
73 Pallid harrier Circus macrourus (Gmelin, 1770) 1
74 Long-legged buzzard Buteo rufinus (Cretzschmar, 1829) 3
Burhinidae 75 Eurasian stone-curlew Burhinus oedicnemus (Linnaeus, 1758) 5
Columbidae 76 European turtle dove Streptopelia turtur (Linnaeus, 1758) 2
77 Laughing dove Spilopelia senegalensis (Linnaeus, 1766) 50
Tytonidae 78 Barn owl Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) 1
Strigidae 79 Little owl Athene noctua (Scopoli, 1769) 11
80 Pharaoh eagle-owl Bubo ascalaphus (Savigny, 1809) 1
Apodidae 81 Common swift Apus apus (Linnaeus, 1758) 188
Upupidae 82 Common hoopoe Upupa epops (Linnaeus, 1758) 22
Falconidae 83 Common kestrel Falco tinnunculus (Linnaeus, 1758) 6
Malaconotidae 84 Black-crowned tchagra Tchagra senegalus (Linnaeus, 1766) 1
Laniidae 85 Southern grey shrike Lanius meridionalis (Temminck, 1820) 51
Corvidae 86 Common raven Corvus corax (Linnaeus, 1758) 7
Alaudidae 87 Greater hoopoe-lark Alaemon alaudipes (Desfontaines, 1789) 5
88 Crested lark Galerida cristata (Linnaeus, 1758) 104
89 Thekla's lark Galerida theklae (Brehm, 1857) 1
90 Eurasian skylark Alauda arvensis (Linnaeus, 1758) 18
Hirundinidae 91 Barn swallow Hirundo rustica (Linnaeus, 1758) 3
92 Northern house martin Delichon urbicum (Linnaeus, 1758) 10
Phylloscopidae 93 Common chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita (Vieillot, 1817) 389
Acrocephalidae 94 Great reed-warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus (Linnaeus, 1758) 1
Leiothrichidae 95 Fulvous babbler Turdoides fulva (Desfontaines, 1789) 16
Sylviidae 96 Spectacled warbler Curruca conspicillata (Temminck, 1820) 2
97 Sardinian warbler Curruca melanocephala (Gmelin, 1789) 15
98 Eurasian blackcap Sylvia atricapilla (Linnaeus, 1758) 1
Sturnidae 99 Common starling Sturnus vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758) 12,740
Turdidae 100 Common blackbird Turdus merula (Linnaeus, 1758) 5
101 Song thrush Turdus philomelos (Brehm, 1831) 1
Muscicapidae 102 Spotted flycatcher Muscicapa striata (Pallas, 1764) 1
103 European robin Erithacus rubecula (Linnaeus, 1758) 20
104 Bluethroat Luscinia svecica (Linnaeus, 1758) 2
105 Black redstart Phoenicurus ochruros (Gmelin, 1774) 15
106 Moussier's redstart Phoenicurus moussieri (Olphe-Galliard, 1852) 1
107 Whinchat Saxicola rubetra (Linnaeus, 1758) 1
108 Common stonechat Saxicola torquatus (Linnaeus, 1766) 115
109 Desert wheatear Oenanthe deserti (Temminck, 1829) 8
110 Mourning wheatear Oenanthe lugens (Lichtenstein, 1823) 5
Muscicapidae 111 White-crowned wheatear Oenanthe leucopyga (Brehm, 1855) 5
112 Black wheatear Oenanthe leucura (Gmelin, 1789) 22
113 Blue rock thrush Monticola solitaries (Linnaeus, 1758) 1
Passeridae 114 House sparrow Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) 53
115 Spanish sparrow Passer hispaniolensis (Temminck, 1820) 438
Motacillidae 116 White wagtail Motacilla alba (Linnaeus, 1758) 225
117 Meadow pipit Anthus pratensis (Linnaeus, 1758) 66
118 Red-throated pipit Anthus cervinus (Pallas, 1811) 2
Fringillidae 119 European serin Serinus serinus (Linnaeus, 1766) 121
Emberizidae 120 Corn bunting Emberiza calandra (Linnaeus, 1758) 45

Fig. 2. Diversity of bird families during the IWC 2022 in Libya.

Fig. 2.

Table 3. Number of birds in the covered sites during the IWC 2022 in Libya.

No Site name WB diversity WB abundance NWB diversity NWB abundance Threatened sp.
1 Ras jdeir 10 92 6 18 3
2 Farwah Abokammash coast 23 3,452 3 61 3
3 Farwah 27 1,652 1 2 8
4 Sabkhet Almanqoub 5 125 2 15 2
5 Zwarah Harbour 7 598 0 0 2
6 Sabkhet Mellita 3 15 3 11 0
7 Wadi Kaam dam 21 342 11 49 4
8 Kahaf Dakhil 7 819 9 25 1
9 Zliten Sewage Treatment Plant 8 249 4 66 1
10 Zliten Harbour 10 371 0 0 4
11 Ain Kaam 8 70 6 26 1
12 Alkhoms harbour 7 132 1 2 2
13 Alkrarem 1 25 12 2,485 0
14 Misrata's industrial area 1 11 3 1,451 0
15 Misrata harbour 5 89 0 0 2
16 Qaser Ahmed 13 849 16 283 1
17 Zraiqh port 15 435 9 236 6
18 Misrata treatment plant 15 906 8 779 4
19 Wadi Saso 13 57 15 308 1
20 Tawergha 1 1 17 3,012 0
21 Al-Heesha 22 413 9 43 3
22 Sirt harbour 10 180 1 1 4
23 Sultan 2 2 0 0 1
24 Abumariem 6 85 1 20 3
25 Derna coast 6 154 1 1 2
26 Wadi Alkhabta 3 13 7 49 1
27 Wadi Alhamsa 5 25 9 82 0
28 Um hafain 15 785 5 60 2
29 Sabkhat at Tamimi 7 55 6 57 2
30 Ras Attin 7 117 1 12 5
31 Alqsebaia 7 126 2 2 3
32 Ain Alghazala 3 36 1 2 1
33 Tobruk harbour 4 192 0 0 3
34 Khalij al Bumbah 7 193 0 0 0
35 Ain Ashaghigha 2 30 2 3 0
36 Ain Azargha 0 0 2 153 0
37 Al Marj 2 535 0 0 0
38 Sabkhat Julyanah 15 2,879 7 341 3
39 Sabkhat Nairuz 1 21 0 0 1
40 Sabkhat al Nakhil 5 23 2 3 3
41 Sabkhat Qaminis 6 150 1 30 3
42 Sabkhat Qanfudhah 11 35,169 4 1,516 3
43 Ayn Zayyanah 7 550 6 2,508 2
44 Bou Dzira 6 1,626 1 1 0
45 Ras Almengar 6 79 2 17 3
46 Sabkhat al Thama 16 1,255 5 34 3
47 Assabri beach 6 154 3 5 3
48 Tebesti lake 10 52 2 401 2
49 Sabkhat Karkurah 6 221 3 8 2
50 Sabkhat al Burayqah 2 15 5 58 2
51 Algordabia reservoir 4 24 1 150 0
52 Al-Washka 10 1,345 2 3 4
53 Wadi Turghat 6 10 9 46 1
54 Annjeela sewage 11 945 10 32 2
55 Wadi Al-mjenin dam 15 96 4 57 3
56 Wadi Ghan dam 4 20 2 5 0
57 Ain Taghneet 0 0 6 18 0
58 Al-Mallaha 8 98 3 10 2
59 Tajoura coast 9 140 6 11 3
60 Tajoura port 5 124 0 0 2
61 Tripoli coast 11 246 3 64 3
62 Tripoli harbour 7 978 0 0 3
63 Al Haḑabah Sewage Treatment Plant 8 295 10 203 2
64 Qergarish 21 764 1 1 6

The abundance of non-waterbirds was 14,836 individuals belonging to 52 species out of 25 families, the highest diversity was in the family Muscicapidae, represented by 12 species, and the abundance of those species was 474 individuals. The largest abundance of non-waterbird species was 12,740 for the family Sturnidae, although it has represented by only one species: Common Starling Sturnus vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758) (Table 2).

The diverse species of non-waterbirds varied between sites (0–17), with the highest diversity being in the Tawergha region and in terms of abundance, which was 3,012, while a total of 10 sites with no records of non-waterbirds (Table 3).

Using the LPI Chain method revealed that the population index of the wintering water birds in Libya in 2022 has increased by up to more than 100%. The period from 2005 to 2009 showed a fluctuation of rising between 50% and 100%, while, for the period from 2013 to 2021, the index showed a dramatic decrease of 25% to 100%, particularly in the year 2015 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. LPI of wintering water birds in Libya 2005–2022.

Fig. 3.

This survey observed a total of 18 endangered (Threatened) bird species; 16 are aquatic, and 2 are non-aquatic birds. This classification is depending on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN Red-list) and the Annex II of the (RAC/SPA-MAP/UNEP). Moreover, six of them are evaluated as threatened species, the other six species are near threatened, and the vulnerable, endangered species are six (Table 4). Those species have been recorded in 79.6% of sites (n = 64).

Table 4. Threatened species recorded during the IWC 2022 in Libya.

Species Common name No. No. of sites Status Source
1. Larus audouinii (Payraudeau, 1826) Audouin's gull 21 9 VU, T * & **
2. Larus genei (Breme, 1839) Slender billed gull 2,169 32 VU, T * & **
3. Larus melanocephalus (Temminick, 1820) Mediterranean gull 5,026 20 T **
4. Thalasseus bengalensis (Lesson, 1831) Lesser crested tern 7 1 T **
5. Sterna sandvicensis (Latham, 1878) Sandwich tern 502 21 T **
6. Charadrius alexandrines (Linnaeus, 1758) Kentish plover 592 20 T **
7. Gulosus aristotelis (Linnaeus, 1761) European shag 8 2 T **
8. Phoenicopterus roseus (Pallas, 1811) Greater flamingo 352 6 T **
9. Puffinus yelkouan (Acerbi, 1827) Levantine shearwater 3 2 VU, T * & **
10. Aythya ferina (Linnaeus, 1758) Common pochard 5 1 VU *
11. Aythya nyroca (Güldenstädt, 1770) Ferruginous duck 60 5 NT *
12. Marmaronetta angustirostris (Ménétries, 1832) Marbled teal 8 3 VU *
13. Numenius arquata (Linnaeus, 1758) Eurasian curlew 16 6 NT *
14. Calidris ferruginea (Pontoppidan, 1763) Curlew sandpiper 7 4 NT *
15. Haematopus ostralegus(Linnaeus, 1758) Eurasian oystercatcher 34 2 NT *
16. Limosa lapponica (Linnaeus, 1758) Bar-tailed godwit 1 1 NT *
17. Circus macrourus (Gmelin, 1770) Pallid harrier 1 1 NT *
18. Streptopelia turtur (Linnaeus, 1758) European turtle dove 2 1 VU *

VU= vulnerable, T= Threatened, NT= Near threatened, * = IUCN Redlist & ** = Annex II (RAC/SPA).

Discussion

The results of IWC 2022 in Libya are generally reasonable compared to the previous years (2013–2021), but they can be compared with the results of the beginning of the survey in Libya during the years from 2005 to 2012 (Azafzaf et al., 2005, 2006; Smart et al., 2006; Etayeb et al., 2007; Hamza et al., 2008; EGA-RAC/SPA, 2012). The main reason for the improvement is related to the number of covered sites in which the census is conducted, as it decreased significantly during the years 2013–2021, with a total of six sites in 2015, while in 2010, the number of covered sites reached 94 (EGA-RAC/SPA, 2012).

The highest abundance of waterbirds in 2008 was 53,632 (Hamza et al., 2008), and the highest diversity was 92 in 2007 (Etayeb et al., 2007), compared to the results of IWC 2022, where 68 species were recorded with the abundance of 61,850 birds, this indicated good improvement in term of diversity and abundance of species, as well as, the LPI emphasized this improvement in 2022, where it was increased up to more than 100% from the point of starting in 2005. However, under normal circumstances, Libya is considered less diverse and abundant of birds compared to its neighboring countries such as Tunisia and Egypt (Smart et al., 2006), through which major migration routes pass, as the first route passes along the Nile River and the other one passes through Italy and Sicily to Tunisia (Berthold, 2001).

Although the family Scolopacidae was represented by the highest diversity (17 species), followed by the Anatidae family with 11 species, in terms of abundance, the family Laridae was the highest, represented by seven species, including gull species which are marine birds, and the covered sites are along the coastline. Moreover, the important factor that explains the abundance of gulls in large numbers is the presence of dumping grounds in some sabkha; this attracts high numbers of gulls that reach tens of thousands because these species are mainly scavengers and prefer the putrescible-waste landfills (Belant, 1997). One of the most important areas where there are many gulls is Sabkhat Qanfudhah, the largest dumps in the Benghazi region. The number of Black-headed gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus exceeded 15,000, and more than 9,000 individuals of the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis were recorded. However, the diversity and abundance of bird species are usually related to habitat type and preference factors (Jones, 2001).

Recording and observing the globally threatened species is one of four criteria used by the global network of important bird areas (IBAs) and the IUCN to identify the importance of the sites for biodiversity in general and birds in particular (BirdLife International, 2014; IUCN, 2016).

This study recorded a total of 18 threatened species with varying numbers in 51 sites out of 64. These records give importance to the sites where threatened species were recorded. Moreover, such recordings support decision-makers in declaring protected areas in addition to other reasons or purposes for protection. However, recording one endangered species is sufficient to give the area importance and be a priority for protection (Day et al., 2012; Stolton et al., 2013).

Regarding sites, depending on the registered threatened species, Farwa is considered the most important site as an IBA and marine protected area (MPA); indeed, it has been declared as MPA by the resolution of the Minister of Agriculture, Animal and Marine No. 22 of 2009. Ain Alghazala also was declared as MPA in 2011, although this study found only one threatened species. This finding is considered supportive of the protection decision, in addition to the presence of other important species of fish recorded in the area. Overall, this study strongly recommends that the rest of the sites listed in the present study should be protected and managed, as well as implementing a comprehensive study to address the other biodiversity components.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this paper are grateful to Laura Dami, the coordinator of Med-Waterbirds Network based in Tour du Valat, and also to AFD/FEEM project for financial and logical support. Many thanks to Dr. Huda Alhdad (head of the Benghazi branch, Ministry of Environment) for good coordination in conducting the census in Benghazi. Special thanks to Mr. Adel Aburas (London, Wood Green, UK) for proofreading the manuscript.

References

  1. Azafzaf H, Baccetti N, Defos du Rau P, Dlensi H, Essghaier M.F, Etayeb K, Hamza A, Smart M. Regional Activities Centre/Special Protected Areas (MAP/UNEP), Environment General Authority, Libya, and African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement (UNEP/AEWA) Tunis, Tunisia: 2005. Report on an ornithological survey in Libya from 3 to 17 January 2005 (Unpublished report) [Google Scholar]
  2. Azafzaf H, Baccetti N, Defos du Rau P, Dlensi H, Essghaier M.F, Etayeb K, Hamza A, Smart M. Report on an Ornithological Survey in Libya from 19 to 31 January 2006. Cyclostyled report to the Regional Activity Centre/Special protected Areas (MAP/UNEP), Environment General Agency, Libya and to the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement (UNEP/AEWA) 2006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Belant J.L. Gulls in urban environments: landscape-level management to reduce conflict. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 1997;38:245–258. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berthold P. 2nd. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001. Bird migration, a general survey; p. 253. [Google Scholar]
  5. BirdLife International. Important bird and biodiversity areas: a global network for conserving nature and benefiting people. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourass E, Baccetti N, Bashimam W, Berbash A, Bou Zainen M, De Faveri A, Galidan A, Saied A.M, Yahia J, Zenatello M. Results of the seventh winter waterbird census in Libya, January-February 2011. Bull. Afr. Bird. Club. 2013;20:20–26. [Google Scholar]
  7. Day J, Dudley N, Hockings M, Holmes G, Laffoley D, Stolton S, Wells S. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2012. Guidelines for applying the IUCN protected area management categories to marine protected areas; p. 36. [Google Scholar]
  8. Defos du Rau P, Essghaier M.F.A, Etayeb K. Inventaire preliminaire des zones humides cotieres de Libya. Faune. Sauvage. (ONCFS) 2003;259:44–48. [Google Scholar]
  9. EGA-RAC/SPA Waterbird Census Team. Atlas of wintering waterbirds of Libya, 2005-2010. Ben Arous, Tunisia: Imprimerie COTIM; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Etayeb K.S, Berbash A, Bashimam W, Bouzainen M, Galidana A, Saied M, Yahia J, Bourass E. Results of the eighth winter waterbird census in Libya in January 2012. Biodiver. J. 2015;6(1):245–252. [Google Scholar]
  11. Etayeb K.S, Essghaier M.F, Hamza A, Smart M, Azafzaf H, Defos du Rau P, Dlensi H. Report on an ornithological survey in Libya from 3 to 15 February 2007. EGA-AEWA-RAC/SPAMAP- UNEP. 2007:46. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamza A, Saied A, Bourass E, Yahya J, Smart M, Baccetti N, Defos P, Dlensi H, Azafzaf H. Final report on a fourth winter ornithological survey in Libya, 20-31 January 2008. EGA-AEWARAC/ SPA-MAP-UNEP. 2008:31. [Google Scholar]
  13. IUCN. A global standard for the identification of key biodiversity areas, version 1.0. 1st. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones J. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. The Auk. 2001;118(2):557–562. [Google Scholar]
  15. Loh J, Green R.E, Ricketts T, Lamoreux J, Jenkins M, Kapos V, Randers J. The living planet index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2005;360:289–295. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sayoud M.S, Salhi H, Chalabi B, Allali A, Dakki M, Qninba A, El-Agbani M.A, Azafzaf H, Feltrup-Azafzaf C, Dlensi H, Hamouda N, Abdel Latif Ibrahim W, Asran H, Abu Elnoor A, Ibrahim H, Etayeb K, Bouras E, Bashaimam W, Berbash A, Deschamps C, Mondain-Monval J.Y, Brochet A.L, Véran S, Defos du Rau P. The first coordinated trans-North African mid-winter waterbird census: the contribution of the international waterbird census to the conservation of waterbirds and wetlands at a biogeographical level. Biol. Conserv. 2017;206:11–20. [Google Scholar]
  17. Smart M, Essghaier M.F, Etayeb K, Hamza A, Azafzaf H, Baccetti N, Defos Du Rau P. Wetlands and wintering waterbirds in Libya, January 2005 and 2006. Wildfowl. Wetl. Trust. 2006;56:172–191. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stolton S, Shadie P, Dudley N. 21. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2013. IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on recognising protected areas and assigning management categories and governance types, best practice protected area guidelines series; p. 143. [Google Scholar]
  19. Volpato G.H, Lopes E.V, Mendonça L.B, Boçon R, Bisheimer M.V, Serafini P.P, Anjos L.D. The use of the point count method for bird survey in the Atlantic forest. Zoologia. 2009;26(1):74–78. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Open Veterinary Journal are provided here courtesy of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli

RESOURCES