Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2023 May 9;12(10):1937. doi: 10.3390/plants12101937

Genetic Divergence and Population Structure of Xanthomonas albilineans Strains Infecting Saccharum spp. Hybrid and Saccharum officinarum

Zhong-Ting Hu 1,, Mbuya Sylvain Ntambo 2,, Jian-Ying Zhao 1, Talha Javed 1, Yang Shi 1, Hua-Ying Fu 1, Mei-Ting Huang 1, San-Ji Gao 1,*
Editor: Ye Xia
PMCID: PMC10222335  PMID: 37653854

Abstract

Leaf scald caused by Xanthomonas albilineans (Xa) is a major bacterial disease in sugarcane that represents a threat to the global sugar industry. Little is known about the population structure and genetic evolution of this pathogen. In this study, 39 Xa strains were collected from 6 provinces in China. Of these strains, 15 and 24 were isolated from Saccharum spp. hybrid and S. officinarum plants, respectively. Based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), with five housekeeping genes, these strains were clustered into two distinct phylogenetic groups (I and II). Group I included 26 strains from 2 host plants, Saccharum spp. hybrid and S. officinarum collected from 6 provinces, while Group II consisted of 13 strains from S. officinarum plants in the Zhejiang province. Among the 39 Xa strains, nucleotide sequence identities from 5 housekeeping genes were: ABC (99.6–100%), gyrB (99.3–100%), rpoD (98.4–100%), atpD (97.0–100%), and glnA (97.6–100%). These strains were clustered into six groups (A–F), based on the rep-PCR fingerprinting, using primers for ERIC2, BOX A1R, and (GTG)5. UPGMA and PCoA analyses revealed that group A had the most strains (24), followed by group C with 11 strains, while there was 1 strain each in groups B and D–F. Neutral tests showed that the Xa population in S. officinarum had a trend toward population expansion. Selection pressure analysis showed purification selection on five concatenated housekeeping genes from all tested strains. Significant genetic differentiation and infrequent gene flow were found between two Xa populations hosted in Saccharum spp. hybrids and S. officinarum. Altogether, these results provide evidence of obvious genetic divergence and population structures among Xa strains from China.

Keywords: genetic diversity, housekeeping gene, population structure, rep-PCR, sugarcane, Xanthomonas albilineans

1. Introduction

Sugarcane is an important cash crop that represents 80% of sugar and 40% of ethanol production worldwide [1]. China produced 9.56 million tons of sugar from sugarcane and sugar beets during the 2021/2022 crushing season, whereby the three main sugarcane-producing provinces (Guangxi, Yunnan, and Guangdong) accounted for 64.0%, 20.3%, and 5.7%, respectively [2]. Climate change is leading to diverse abiotic and biotic stressors that have major impacts on food production worldwide [3]. Plant diseases can occur in both the pre- and postharvest phase of crop production chains, resulting in a 13–22% annual yield loss of major food crops [4]. Leaf scald commonly occurs throughout the growth and development stage of sugarcane plants in sugarcane-planting areas worldwide. In China, sugarcane leaf scald was first recorded in Taiwan in the 1980s based on symptomatology and traditional cytological and biochemical techniques [5]. Leaf scald is caused by X. albilineans (Xa) and molecular analysis identified the presence of this disease in nine provinces of China [5,6,7].

Xanthomonas spp. are Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the family Xanthomonadaceae and cause a range of diseases in over 400 monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants worldwide [8,9]. Most Xanthomonas spp. strains are characterized by the presence of a membrane-bound pigment “Xanthomonadin” that produces a yellow color in culture media [9,10]. Each Xanthomonas spp., which shows a different host range or produces different disease symptoms is classified as a separate species, while some are further taxonomically classified into different subspecies and pathovars that show a high degree of host plant specificity and tissue specificity, which can involve the host plant vascular system or mesophyll tissues [9,11,12]. Taxonomical classification of different subspecies and pathovars in the Xanthomonas species confirms a particular adaptation to plants due to the expression of virulence factors [13]. Xanthomonas spp. are rapidly evolving microbes, as evidenced by the evolutionary dynamics of an emerging and variant pathovar of this bacterial species [9]. Among Xanthomonas spp., Xa is assigned to a unique clade in the phylogenetic tree based on whole-genome sequences; its genome has undergone significant erosion and possesses an “open” and flexible genome [13,14].

Substantial genetic plasticity exists among Xa strains around the world. A total of 28 Xa strains from 11 different countries can be split into 3 serovars and 6 lysovars for the pathogen [15,16]. Serological diversity of the pathogen has been confirmed using a combination of monoclonal antibodies and DNA fingerprinting of 38 Xa strains from various geographical locations [17]. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) revealed that 218 isolates from 31 geographical locations were clustered into 10 genetic groups (PFGE-A to PFGE-J) [18,19,20]. Our recent studies revealed that the majority of Xa strains in China belonged to PFGE-B [21], while some strains from a novel group were proposed based on MLSA and simple sequence repeats (SSRs) [7,22]. In addition to the MLSA and SSR methods, other fingerprinting tools have also been used to investigate Xa genetic divergence, including restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) [18], random amplified fragment polymorphism (RAPD) [23], rep-PCR [24], and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [25]. Recently, whole-genome sequencing of Xa strains was performed on two strains from China [26,27] and four strains from Brazil [28]. These strains were further used together alongside publicly available strains in the NCBI database to explore genomic diversity.

Our previous studies examined the genetic diversity of Xa in China based on MLSA and SSR techniques [7,21,22], although the population divergence and evolution of this pathogen remain largely unexplored. The aims of this study were to: (a) use rep-PCR and MLSA to investigate the genetic diversity of 39 Xa strains from China, (b) estimate the population structure of these strains, and (c) analyze the evolutionary driving force that forms Xa populations from a modern commercial cultivar (Saccharum spp. hybrid) and chewing cane (S. officinarum).

2. Results

2.1. Sequence Identity Analysis for Five Housekeeping Genes

Sequence identities among 39 Xa strains were investigated based on 5 individual housekeeping genes, including ABC (encodes the ABC transporter protein), rpoD (encodes the bacterial RNA polymerase β subunit), glnA (encodes a citrate synthase), gyrB (encodes the DNA gyrase β subunit), and atpD (encodes the ATP synthase β subunit). The lowest nucleotide sequence divergences were observed for ABC (99.6–100%) and gyrB (99.3–100%), followed by rpoD (98.4–100%), then, glnA (97.6–100%), and atpD (97.0–100%), suggesting that a low rate of nucleotide mutations was predominate in two genes (ABC and gyrB). A similar trend for sequence divergence was observed based on the amino acid sequences of the five genes (Table S1).

2.2. Phylogenetic Grouping Based on MLSA

A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the concatenated sequences of the 5 housekeeping genes revealed that all 39 Xa strains were allocated in 2 major phylogenetic clades (I and II), while the reference strain REU209 (PFGE-J group) from Reunion Island (France) was assigned to a unique clade III (Figure 1). Clade I (PFGE-B group) included 26 strains hosted in several modern commercial cultivars and 2 chewing cane cultivars (Guangdonghuangpi and Badila) from 6 provinces. Clade II (Xa-RA) comprised 13 strains hosted in a chewing cane cultivar (Taoshangguozhe) from Ruian, Zhejiang province.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of the concatenated sequences of 5 housekeeping genes based on 39 X. albilineans strains from China and a reference strain REU209 from France.

2.3. Genetic Diversity Based on Rep-PCR Analysis

Here, we analyzed 39 Xa strains in China using 3 rep-PCR primers for ERIC2, BOX A1R, and (GTG)5, which, on average, directed the amplification of 6–10 fragments ranging in size from 700 to 5000 bp. The BOX primer pair had the highest discriminatory power, as evidenced by a higher polymorphism information content (PIC) value (0.87). The ERIC and GTG primer pairs both had the same PIC value (0.83) (Table 1).

Table 1.

DNA fingerprinting parameters for 39 X. albilineans strains from China based on a rep-PCR assay.

Parameter Rep-PCR Primer for DNA Fingerprinting
ERIC BOX A1R (GTG)5
Total differentiable samples 12 15 11
Total indifferentiable samples 27 24 28
Genetic similarity 0.18–1 0.25–1 0.31–1
Total bands 24 24 27
Polymorphic bands 16 19 16
Minimum number of bands 9 13 13
Maximum number of bands 3 3 7
Average number of bands 6 9 10
Range (bp) 700–5000 900–5000 1000–5000
Polymorphism information content (PIC) 0.83 0.87 0.83

2.4. UPGMA and PCoA Analyses

UPGMA analysis based on the fingerprints generated from the three aforementioned primer sets showed that the genetic similarity coefficient among the 39 Xa strains ranged from 0.28 to 1.00. When the genetic similarity coefficient was 0.64, these strains could be divided into six groups (Figure 2). Group A was the largest with 24 strains from 6 provinces. Group C was the second-largest with 11 strains (XaCN42–XaCN44, XaCN46–XaCN51, XaCN54, and XaCN56) that originated from the city of Ruian in the Zhejiang province. The individual strain XaCN17 (Wuzhishan, Hainan province) was clustered in group B, while XaCN45 and XaCN55 (Ruian, Zhejiang province) were clustered in groups D and E, respectively, and XaCN14 (Xingyi, Guizhou province) was clustered in group F. PCoA analysis indicated that PCoA 1 and 2 accounted for 73.93% of the total variances. The classification of these 39 strains was identical to the UPGMA analysis (Figure S1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Dendrogram based on cluster analysis (UPGMA) of the estimated genetic similarity among 39 X. albilineans strains based on rep-PCR fingerprints.

2.5. Neutrality Tests and Selection Pressure Analysis

According to two different hosts, all 39 Xa strains were divided into 15 strains from the Saccharum spp. hybrid group (commercial cultivars) and 24 strains from the S. officinarum group (chewing cane). Based on five housekeeping genes, sequence identity analysis revealed 98.8–100% and 99.4–99.9% nucleotide identity for the two Xa strain populations from Saccharum spp. hybrid and S. officinarum, respectively. The amino acid identities were similarly high at 99.0–100% and 99.3–100%, respectively. The nucleotide diversity (π) showed that Xa strains from the Saccharum spp. hybrid group had higher genetic variation than S. officinarum. A neutral test showed that the Tajima’s D value for Xa strains from the Saccharum spp. hybrid was significantly less than 0, indicating that the population of these Xa strains exhibited a trend for population expansion. Selection pressure analysis showed that the five tandem genes from two Xa populations underwent purification selection during evolution, as evidenced by a ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous (dN/dS) rates that were <1 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Genetic diversity, neutrality test, and selection pressure of the concatenated sequences for 5 housekeeping genes in 39 X. albilineans strains from different host sources.

Group Identity (%) Nucleotide Diversity (π) Tajima’s D a dN/dS b
Nucleotide Amino Acid
All (n = 39) 98.5–100 99.0–100 0.00568 −1.04156 (ns) 0.09
Saccharum spp. hybrids (n = 15) 98.8~100 99.3–100 0.00175 −2.2732 (**) 0.78
S. officinarum (n = 24) 99.4–99.90 99.0–100 0.00605 0.09801 (ns) 0.07

a **: 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01; ns: not significant. b dN/dS, the ratio of nonsynonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) substitution rates.

2.6. Genetic Differentiation and Gene Flow

To further investigate the evolutionary process of these strains based on Saccharum spp. hybrids and S. officinarum, values describing genetic differentiation and gene flow were calculated. Values for Ks*, Z*, and Snn were 2.59155, 5.47487, and 0.65385, respectively, and all were statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating obvious genetic differentiation of the two populations. The FST value (0.40461) was >0.33 and the Nm value (0.74) was <1, suggesting an infrequent gene flow between the two populations. These results indicated that local host isolation might be the main factor that formed the population constructs in the Xa strains in China (Table 3).

Table 3.

Gene flow and genetic differentiation between two X. albilineans populations based on different hosts a.

Group Ks* (p Value) Z* (p Value) Snn (p Value) Fst Nm
Saccharum spp. hybrids (n = 15) vs. S. officinarum (n = 24) 2.59155 (0.0000 ***) 5.47487 (0.0010 **) 0.65385 (0.0120 *) 0.40461 0.74

a Probability (p-value) obtained by the permutation test (PM test) with 1000 replicates. *: 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05; **: 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01; ***: p ≤ 0.001.

3. Discussion

Extensive genetic diversity among Xanthomonas spp. can be categorized at multiple levels including within populations and species [13]. The high genetic variability of Xa strains across the world has been investigated in several previous studies [19,21,29]. In our early observations, low genetic diversity of X. albilineans strains clustered with foreign strains in the PFGE-B group was reported in China [21]. These strains were isolated from the modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp. hybrid), grown within China. However, some Xa strains were collected from a local traditional chewing cane cultivar Taoshangguozhe (S. officinarum), collected in the city of Ruian (Zhejiang province), and were proposed to form a new phylogenetic group, Xa-RA, based on MLSA with two (ABC and gyrB) [22] or four (rpoD, glnA, gyrB, and atpD) genes [7].

Here, we further verified the two distinct phylogenetic groups of Xa strains that exist in China by MLSA with five housekeeping gene sequences (ABC, rpoD, glnA, gyrB, and atpD). The strains hosted in the cultivar Taoshangguozhe of S. officinarum formed a separate group, group II, which was distinct from other Chinese strains, whereas the Xa strains hosted in two chewing cane cultivars (Guangdonghuangpi and Badila) of S. officinarum along with Xa strains hosted in modern commercial cultivars clustered into the same group (Group I). Notably, the famous chewing cane cultivar Badila has been cultivated for more than half a century in southern China, while the cultivar Guangdonghuangpi was recently introduced into Zhejiang from Guangdong province [22]. Almost all Xa strains from China, including those grown in Guangdong province, clustered in the PFGE-B group [21,30]. Therefore, we propose that the spread of this pathogen might be due to the transport of sugarcane stalks across provinces in China. This possibility would explain why the Xa strains from Guangdonghuangpi and Badila of S. officinarum and modern commercial cultivars (Saccharum spp. hybrid) clustered into the same group (Group I). A similar phylogenetic grouping of these Chinese Xa strains was observed using an MLSA approach based on four housekeeping genes [7].

Subsequently, rep-PCR fingerprinting was employed to amplify highly conserved repetitive sequences that are generally distributed in the bacterial genome to disclose diversity among the strain genomes [24,31]. The advantages of rep-PCR are a simple and fast operation, rich amplification bands, and an absence of strain-specific DNA probes [24,32]. Additionally, REP, ERIC, and BOX sequences for rep-PCR are frequently used in polymorphism analysis of bacteria to evaluate strain diversity [31,33]. Similar to other techniques such as RFLP, rep-PCR is crucial in determining the diversity within bacterial Xa strains [19]. Additionally, rep-PCR was used to reveal the high genetic diversity and clonal population structure of Acidovorax avenae subsp. avenae, which is the causal agent of the red stripe in sugarcane [33]. Notably, based on the fingerprinting profile, the rep-PCR method possesses more discriminatory power than the MLSA method to differentiate among these Xa strains in this study. For example, four strains from Group I (XaCN14 and XaCN17) and II (XaCN45 and XaCN55), identified by MLSA, were separated into four unique groups by rep-PCR fingerprinting. However, MLSA generates a discrete dataset based on the nucleotide sequences of known genes and allows for the accurate calculation of genetic distances compared to rep-PCR [32].

Local host and environmental factors are important driving forces resulting in the emergence and selection of pathogens, including Xanthomonas spp. [13]. Obvious population-level genetic differentiation of Xa strains was observed between S. officinarum and Saccharum spp. hybrid groups, indicating that host isolation might be the main driving force causing the genetic differentiation of the Xa population in China, particularly for the Xa strains hosted in the local cultivar (Taoshangguozhe), in the city of Ruian in Zhejiang province. A previous study suggested that bacteria variants and the reaction of sugarcane cultivars contributed to the genetic and aggressive diversity within the Xa population in the state of São Paulo in Brazil [34]. The interaction between pathogens and specific hosts can cause genetic differentiation of pathogen populations, which is related to the resistance levels of different hosts [35]. A host-driven population shift occurred in X. oryzae pv. oryzae in response to the introduction of resistant plants [36]. However, cross-infection by dispersal rather than by host-driven speciation contributed to the evolution of X. citri subsp. citri pathotypes, resulting in the diversification of this pathotype [37]. It is worthy noted that no correlation was observed between the host plant and variation in pathogenicity of Chinese Xa strains [7]. Other biological variation and bacterial genomics between two Xa populations need be further identified.

The Xa strains in Group II (previously termed Xa-RA by Zhao et al. [7]) determined in this study may also be related to the specific niche and climate conditions of Ruian in Zhejiang province. Ecological conditions such as soil, climate, water, and other factors differ by geographical locations where sugarcane grows and these conditions can also promote genetic differentiation of pathogen populations [13]. Genetic diversity revealed by a phylogenomic tree based on 21 public genomic sequences of worldwide Xa strains can be grouped based on their geographic origin (American, African, or Asiatic), to some degree [28]. Recombination-driven horizontal gene transfer is an important factor that contributes to pathogen population structure and diversity across different Xanthomonas spp. [13]. Additionally, some factors such as effectors related to the secretion system, cell-wall degradation, lipopolysaccharides, and TonB-dependent receptors influence host specificity and bacterial pathogenicity in several Xanthomonas spp. [13,36]. The evolutionary driving force of host jumping or geographical isolation forming genetic populations among Xa strains in China needs to be verified at a genome-wide level using more strains from different hosts and geographical origins.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Collection of X. albilineans Strains and DNA Extraction

Thirty-nine Xa strains were isolated from sugarcane leaf or stalk samples exhibiting leaf scald symptoms [7,26]. These strains were distributed within six provinces (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, and Zhejiang) in China (Table 4). A Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to extract total bacterial genomic DNA. DNA samples with a working concentration of 100 ng/μL were used for the subsequent gene cloning.

Table 4.

Information on 39 X. albilineans strains from China and 1 reference strain from France.

No. Strain a Host Variety b Saccharum spp. Sampling Location Sampling Date
1 Xa-FJ1 Yuegan 48 Saccharum spp. hybrid Zhangzhou, Fujian, China January 2015
2 XaCN14 Qiantang 8 Saccharum spp. hybrid Xingyi, Guizhou, China August 2018
3 XaCN15 Guitang 08-1589 Saccharum spp. hybrid Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China January 2018
4 XaCN16 GUC37 Saccharum spp. hybrid Fusui, Guangxi, China January 2018
5 XaCN17 ROC20 Saccharum spp. hybrid Wuzhishan, Hainan, China June 2019
6 XaCN18 Yuetang 92-1287 Saccharum spp. hybrid Wuzhishan, Hainan, China June 2019
7 XaCN19 Funong 93-23 Saccharum spp. hybrid Wuzhishan, Hainan, China June 2019
8 XaCN20 ROC20 Saccharum spp. hybrid Wuzhishan, Hainan, China June 2019
9 XaCN21 HoCP 93-750 Saccharum spp. hybrid Sanya, Hainan, China June 2019
10 XaCN22 16139 Saccharum spp. hybrid Danzhou, Hainan, China June 2019
11 XaCN23 NA Saccharum spp. hybrid Danzhou, Hainan, China June 2019
12 XaCN24 Yunzhe 11-1204 Saccharum spp. hybrid Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China June 2019
13 XaCN25 Regan 15-285 Saccharum spp. hybrid Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China June 2019
14 XaCN28 NA Saccharum spp. hybrid Wuming, Guangxi, China May 2019
15 XaCN29 Yuetang 93-159 Saccharum spp. hybrid Fuzhou, Fujian, China May 2019
16 XaCN30 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
17 XaCN31 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
18 XaCN32 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
19 XaCN33 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
20 XaCN34 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
21 XaCN35 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
22 XaCN36 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
23 XaCN37 Badila S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
24 XaCN38 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
25 XaCN40 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
26 XaCN41 Guangdonghaungpi S. officinarum Wenling, Zhejiang, China June 2019
27 XaCN42 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
28 XaCN43 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
29 XaCN44 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
30 XaCN45 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
31 XaCN46 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
32 XaCN47 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
33 XaCN48 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
34 XaCN49 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
35 XaCN50 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
36 XaCN51 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
37 XaCN54 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
38 XaCN55 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
39 XaCN56 Taoshanguozhe S. officinarum Ruian, Zhejiang, China August 2019
40 REU209 NA NA Reunion Island, France 1995

a Strain Xa-FJ1 (No. 1) and No. 2–39 were referenced by [27] and [7], respectively; strain REU209 (No. 40) was referenced by [14]. b NA: not available.

4.2. Amplification of Five Housekeeping Genes among Strains

A total of 5 housekeeping genes (ABC, rpoD, glnA, gyrB, and atpD) were amplified from bacterial DNA from 39 Xa strains by PCR using published primers specific to X. albilineans [21,38]. The five genes selected for MLSA were also included. The primer sequences used to clone these gene fragments are listed in Table S2. The PCR reaction system used a 50 μL reaction volume including 5.0 μL 10X PCR buffer, 4.0 μL 2.5 mmol/L dNTP mixture, 1.0 μL forward primer, and reverse primer (10 μmmol/L each), 0.25 μL 5 U/μL Ex Taq enzyme, 1.0 μL template DNA, and 37.75 μL sterile water. The PCR program was 35 cycles of 94 °C initial denaturation for 1 min; 94 °C denaturation for 30 s, 56 °C annealing for 1 min, 72 °C extension for 30 s, followed by a 5 min extension at 72 °C. All PCR products were purified and cloned into the pMD19-T vector. Three independent positive clones were randomly selected for nucleotide sequencing carried out by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). All gene sequences have been deposited in the NCBI library, and the accession numbers are listed in Table S2. The ABC gene sequences were designed during this study, while the sequences for the other four genes were reported by Zhao et al. (2022) [7].

4.3. Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

The sequences of the five housekeeping genes in the Xa strains were concatenated to yield 4773 nucleotides (nt) for each strain. The corresponding sequence for the REU209 strain from France was used as a reference strain (GenBank accession no. JZII01000001) [20]. All 39 sequences were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm implemented in MEGA 11.0 and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method [39]. Bootstrap values were determined for 1000 replications. Determination of sequence identification was performed using BioEdit v7.1 software [40].

4.4. Rep-PCR Amplification of X. albilineans Genomes

Three rep-PCR primers ERIC2 (5′- AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG-3′), BOX A1R (5′-CTACGGCAAGGCGACGCTGACG-3′), and (GTG)5 (5′-GTGGTGGTGGTGGTG-3′), previously designed by Silvio et al. [24], were used. The PCR reaction was performed in a 25 µL reaction volume consisting of 0.25 μL 5 U/µL Ex Taq, 2.5 μL 10X Ex Taq PCR buffer, 2.0 μL 2.5 mmol/L dNTPs buffer, 1.0 µL 10 μmol/L primer, 1.0 μL genomic DNA, and 18.25 μL sterile water. PCR amplification conditions comprised an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 7 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, primer annealing for 1 min at 50 °C (ERIC2), 53 °C (BOX A1R), or 40 °C ((GTG)5), and extension at 65 °C for 8 min. The final step was another extension step at 65 °C for 15 min. After amplification, 6 µL of the reaction products were detected by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel at 4 V/cm for 2 h. Gels were photographed using an Automatic Gel Imaging Analysis System (Shanghai Peiqing Science & Technology, Shanghai, China).

4.5. DNA Fingerprinting of Strains Based on Rep-PCR Datasets

Bands at each different position in the DNA fingerprint of 39 Xa strains were used as a molecular marker (a locus). All rep-PCR bands were included in the dataset and converted into a code with 1 (present) or 0 (absent). The polymorphism information content (PIC) of the loci was calculated according to the following formula:

PIC=1j=1nPij2

where Pij represents the frequency of the jth allele for locus i and is summed across all alleles [41]. PIC is the ability of a marker to detect a polymorphism. A distance tree was constructed using clustering with the unweighted pair group method using the arithmetic mean (UPGMA) in the SHAN program of NTSYS-PC 2.10e software (University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was conducted using tools on the online website https://cloud.oebiotech.cn/task/ (accessed on 28 November 2022).

4.6. Determination of Genetic Parameters of Populations

To further explore the degree of genetic evolution and differentiation among Xa strains from different host sources, DnaSP v5.0 software was used to determine the genetic parameters of populations based on tandem sequence sets of five housekeeping genes [42]. The genetic parameters for populations included nucleotide diversity (π), neutral test parameters (Tajima’s D), and selection pressure (dN/dS). Negative, neutral, and positive selections were indicated by dN/dS ratios < 1, =1, and >1, respectively. The genetic differentiation parameters for populations included Ks*, Z*, and Snn values, and probability (p-value) obtained by a permutation test with 1000 replicates. The gene flow parameters included FST values and Nm values. |Fst| > 0.33 or |Nm| < 1 indicates infrequent gene flow and |Fst| < 0.33 or |Nm| > 1 indicates frequent gene flow.

5. Conclusions

This study used MLSA and rep-PCR tools to reveal the genetic diversity and population structure of Xa strains hosted in Saccharum spp. hybrid and S. officinarum from China. Two distinct groups were proposed by MLSA with five housekeeping genes, while more distinct groups were proposed by UPGMA and PCoA analyses based on a rep-PCR dataset. The Xa population hosted in S. officinarum had a trend toward population expansion. Purification selection was the main evolutionary driving force on five genes among all tested strains. Obvious genetic differentiation was observed between two Xa populations hosted in Saccharum spp. hybrid and S. officinarum, while infrequent gene flow occurred between the two populations. Altogether, this work provides valuable information for a fundamental understanding of the biology of this pathogen. However, some gaps in information remain that require further exploration. For instance, the global distribution and evolution of this pathogen could be revealed by comparing Xa populations in China to other countries. A whole-genome sequencing approach should be used to gain a more comprehensive understanding of sequence diversity, virulence, and plant–pathogen interactions. Virulence factors such as effectors in diverse secretion systems in Xa strains might reveal host specificity as well as whether emerging strains are evolving and whether evasions of host immunity systems are occurring.

Acknowledgments

We thank Chun-Yu Hu and Rui-Min Shi for their participation in several of the experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12101937/s1, Figure S1: Principal coordinates analysis of 39 X. albilineans strains based on rep-PCR fingerprints; Table S1: Sizes and sequence identities (%) of five housekeeping genes of 39 X. albilineans strains from China; Table S2: Primers used for the amplification of five house-keeping genes of 39 X. albilineans strains from China.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-J.G.; methodology, S.-J.G.; software, Z.-T.H.; validation, S.-J.G. and M.S.N.; formal analysis, M.S.N.; investigation, Z.-T.H.; resources, S.-J.G.; data curation, S.-J.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.-T.H. and M.S.N.; writing—review and editing, J.-Y.Z., T.J., Y.S., H.-Y.F., M.-T.H. and S.-J.G.; supervision, S.-J.G.; project administration, S.-J.G.; funding acquisition, S.-J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary file.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (grant no. CARS-170302).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Javed T., Zhou J.R., Li J., Hu Z.T., Wang Q.N., Gao S.J. Identification and expression profiling of WRKY family genes in sugarcane in response to bacterial pathogen infection and nitrogen implantation dosage. Front. Plant Sci. 2022;13:917953. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.917953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu X., Wu Z., Zhou J. Domestic and foreign sugar markets in 2021/22 crushing season and their prospect for 2022/23 crushing season. Sugarcane Canesugar. 2022;51:54–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gonzalez G.M., Cellini F., Fotopoulos V., Balestrini R., Arbona V. New approaches to improve crop tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiol. Plant. 2021;174:e13547. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Savary S., Willocquet L., Pethybridge S.J., Esker P., McRoberts N., Nelson A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019;3:430–439. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lin L.H., Mbuya S.N., Philippe C.R., Wang Q.N., Lin Y.H., Fu H.Y., Gao S.J. Molecular detection and prevalence of Xanthomonas albilineans, the causal agent of sugarcane leaf scald, in China. Crop Prot. 2018;109:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.02.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang C., Zhang R., Li J. Occurrence of sugarcane leaf scald in sugarcane planting area of Xinping, Yunnan province, China. Sugar Crop. China. 2021;43:66–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhao J.Y., Chen J., Shi Y., Fu H.Y., Huang M.T., Rott P.C., Gao S.J. Sugarcane responses to two strains of Xanthomonas albilineans differing in pathogenicity through a differential modulation of salicylic acid and reactive oxygen species. Front. Plant Sci. 2022;13:1087525. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1087525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stefani E., Obradovic A., Gasic K., Altin I., Nagy I.K., Kovacs T. Bacteriophage-mediated control of phytopathogenic Xanthomonads: A promising green solution for the future. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1056. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Te M.D., Poncheewin W., Schaap P.J., Koehorst J.J. Machine learning approaches to predict the Plant-associated phenotype of Xanthomonas strains. BMC Genom. 2021;22:848. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08093-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saddler G.S., Bradbury J.F. Xanthomonas. In: Whitman W.B., editor. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic of Archaea and Bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. in Association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2015. pp. 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ryan R.P., Vorhölter F., Potnis N., Jones J.B., Van S.M., Bogdanove A.J., Dow J.M. Pathogenomics of Xanthomonas: Understanding bacterium-plant interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;9:344–355. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tambong J.T., Xu R., Cuppels D., Chapados J., Gerdis S., Eyres J., Koziol A., Dettman J. Whole-genome resources and species-level taxonomic validation of 89 plant-pathogenic Xanthomonas strains isolated from various host plants. Plant Dis. 2022;106:1558–1565. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-21-2498-SC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Timilsina S., Potnis N., Newberry E.A., Liyanapathiranage P., Iruegas-Bocardo F., White F.F., Goss E.M., Jones J.B. Xanthomonas diversity, virulence and plant-pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;18:415–427. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0361-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pieretti I., Pesic A., Petras D., Royer M., Süssmuth R.D., Cociancich S. What makes Xanthomonas albilineans unique amongst xanthomonads? Front. Plant Sci. 2015;6:289. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rott P., Arnaud M., Baudin P. Serological and lysotypical variability of Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) dowson, causal agent of sugarcane leaf scald disease. J. Phytopathol. 1986;116:201–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1986.tb00912.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rott P., Davis M.J., Baudin P. Serological variability in Xanthomonas albilineans, causal agent of leaf scald disease of sugarcane. Plant Pathol. 1994;43:344–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1994.tb02694.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alvarez A., Schenck S., Benedict A. Differentiation of Xanthomonas albilineans strains with monoclonal antibody reaction patterns and DNA fingerprints. Plant Pathol. 1996;45:358–366. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-118.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Davis M.J., Rott P., Warmuth C.J., Chatenet M., Baudin P. Intraspecific genomic variation within Xanthomonas albilineans, the sugarcane leaf scald pathogen. Phytopathology. 1997;87:316–324. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.3.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Champoiseau P., Daugrois J., Pieretti I., Cociancich S., Royer M., Rott P. High variation in pathogenicity of genetically closely related strains of Xanthomonas albilineans, the sugarcane leaf scald pathogen, in Guadeloupe. Phytopathology. 2006;96:1081–1091. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pieretti I., Royer M., Barbe V., Carrere S., Koebnik R., Couloux A., Darrasse A., Gouzy J., Jacques M., Lauber E., et al. Genomic insights into strategies used by Xanthomonas albilineans with its reduced artillery to spread within sugarcane xylem vessels. BMC Genom. 2012;13:658. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ntambo M.S., Meng J.Y., Rott P.C., Royer M., Lin L.H., Zhang H.L., Gao S.J. Identification and characterization of Xanthomonas albilineans causing sugarcane leaf scald in China using multilocus sequence analysis. Plant Pathol. 2019;68:269–277. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Duan Y.Y., Zhang Y.Q., Xu Z.X., Lin Y., Mao L.R., Wang W.H., Deng Z.H., Huang M.T., Gao S.J. First report of Xanthomonas albilineans causing leaf scald on two chewing cane clones in Zhejiang province, China. Plant Dis. 2020;2:485. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1312-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Permaul K., Pillay D., Pillay B. Random-amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis shows intraspecies differences among Xanthomonas albilineans strains. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1996;23:307–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1996.tb00196.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lopes S.A., Damann K.E., Grelen L.B. Xanthomonas albilineans diversity and identification based on rep-PCR fingerprints. Curr. Microbiol. 2001;42:155–159. doi: 10.1007/s002840010196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shaik R., Pillay D., Pillay B. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms reveal genetic differentiation among strains of Xanthomonas albilineans. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2009;76:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang H.L., Mbuya S.N., Philippe C.R., Gongyou C., Cheng L.L., Huang M.T., Gao S.J. Complete genome sequence reveals evolutionary and comparative genomic features of Xanthomonas albilineans causing sugarcane leaf scald. Microorganisms. 2020;8:182. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li M., Bao Y., Li Y., Akbar S., Wu G., Du J., Wen R., Chen B., Zhang M. Comparative genome analysis unravels pathogenicity of Xanthomonas albilineans causing sugarcane leaf scald disease. BMC Genom. 2022;23:671. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08900-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miranda R.P., Turrini P.C.G., Bonadio D.T., Zerillo M.M., Berselli A.P., Creste S., Van S.M.A. Genome organization of four Brazilian Xanthomonas albilineans strains does not correlate with aggressiveness. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023;13:e0280222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02802-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cervantes-Romero B., Pérez-Rodríguez P., Rott P., Valdez-Balero A., Osnaya-González M., Robledo-Paz A., Hernández-Juárez C., Crossa J., Rosas-Saito G.H., Silva-Rojas H.V. Distribution, phylogeny, and pathogenicity of Xanthomonas albilineans causing sugarcane leaf scald in Mexico. Crop Prot. 2021;150:105799. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105799. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tian X.H., Zhao J.Y., Fu H.Y., Shi Y., Su J.B., Liu J.R. Molecular detection and identification of Xanthomonas albilineans causing leaf scald of sugarcane in Zhanjiang, Guangdong province of China. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2022;23:731–737. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Guo C., Congcong K., Limei Y., Mu Z., Yangyong Z., Yong W., Jialei J., Zhiyuan F., Honghao L. Genetic diversity and population structure of the Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris strains affecting cabbages in China revealed by MLST and rep-PCR based genotyping. Plant Pathol. J. 2021;37:476–488. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.06.2021.0088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Husni A.A.A., Ismail S.I., Jaafar N.M., Zulperi D. Current classification of the bacillus pumilus group species, the rubber-pathogenic bacteria causing trunk bulges disease in Malaysia as assessed by MLSA and multi rep-PCR approaches. Plant Pathol. J. 2021;37:243–257. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.02.2021.0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bertani R.P., Perera M.F., Joya C.M., Henriquez D.D., Funes C., Chaves S., González V., Welin B., Cuenya M.I., Castagnaro A.P. Genetic diversity and population structure of Acidovorax avenae subsp. avenae isolated from sugarcane in Argentina. Plant Pathol. 2021;70:1719–1732. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Silva M.S., Bedendo I.P., Casagrande M.V. Molecular and pathogenic characterization of isolates of Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) Dowson, causal agent of sugarcane leaf scald. Summa Phytopathol. 2007;33:341–347. doi: 10.1590/S0100-54052007000400004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tardiani A.C., Perecin D., Peixoto-Junior R.F., Sanguino A., Landell M.M.G., Beriam L.O., Nunes D.S., Camargo L.E.A., Creste S. Molecular and pathogenic diversity among Brazilian isolates of Xanthomonas albilineans assessed with SSR marker loci. Plant Dis. 2014;98:540–546. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-13-0762-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Quibod I.L., Atieza-Grande G., Oreiro E.G., Palmos D., Nguyen M.H., Coronejo S.T., Aung E.E., Nugroho C., Roman-Reyna V., Burgos M.R., et al. The Green Revolution shaped the population structure of the rice pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. ISME J. 2020;14:492–505. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0545-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Patané J.S.L., Martins J.J., Rangel L.T., Belasque J., Digiampietri L.A., Facincani A.P., Ferreira R.M., Jaciani F.J., Zhang Y., Varani A.M., et al. Origin and diversification of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri pathotypes revealed by inclusive phylogenomic, dating, and biogeographic analyses. BMC Genom. 2019;20:700. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6007-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Z.K., Comstock J., Hatziloukas E. Comparison of PCR, BIO-PCR, DIA, ELISA and isolation on semiselective medium for detection of Xanthomonas albilineans, the causal agent of leaf scald of sugarcane. Plant Pathol. 2010;48:245–252. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1999.00332.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tamura K., Stecher G., Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021;38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ahmed M.A. BioEdit: An important software for molecular biology. GERF Bull. Biosci. 2011;2:60–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anderson J.A., Churchill G.A., Autrique J.E., Tanksley S.D., Sorrells M.E. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome. 1993;36:181–186. doi: 10.1139/g93-024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2019;25:1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary file.


Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES