Abstract
The straightforward synthesis of three cationic boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY) derivatives and their mitochondria-targeting and photodynamic therapeutic (PDT) capabilities are reported. Two cancer cell lines (HeLa and MCF-7) were used to investigate the PDT activity of the dyes. Compared to their non-halogenated counterparts, halogenated BODIPY dyes exhibit lower fluorescence quantum yields and enable the efficient production of singlet oxygen species. Following LED light irradiation at 520 nm, the synthesized dyes displayed good PDT capabilities against the treated cancer cell lines, with low cytotoxicity in the dark. In addition, functionalization of the BODIPY backbone with a cationic ammonium moiety enhanced the hydrophilicity of the synthesized dyes and, consequently, their uptake by the cells. The results presented here collectively demonstrate the potential of cationic BODIPY-based dyes as therapeutic drugs for anticancer photodynamic therapy.
Keywords: BODIPY, cationic, mitochondria, photodynamic therapy, photosensitizer
1. Introduction
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an innovative, minimally invasive and controlled modality of treating disease that employs a photosensitizer (PS), light, and oxygen (3O2). The mode of treatment involves the generation of singlet oxygen (1O2) and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) from localized PS to induce tissue destruction in areas where these three crucial components merge. Many PS agents have been employed in PDT, including noble metal complexes [1,2], organic framework compounds [3,4], and organic fluorophores (e.g., porphyrins [5], phthalocyanines [6], indocyanine [7], and boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY) [8]). Nevertheless, several drawbacks, including structural instability, poor photostability, and low light-to-dark toxicity ratios, prevent the clinical application of the vast majority of PS compounds. Moreover, many typical PS agents are produced using complex synthetic processes and are soluble only in selected solvents. Thus, there is a growing need to synthesize an innovative class of photosensitizers for PDT that are stable, highly efficient, simple to synthesize, and suitable for a wide range of conditions.
Since its discovery, BODIPY has been established as a versatile fluorophore. BODIPY-based fluorophores have demonstrated immense potential as PDT agents [9,10,11]. These dyes are at the forefront of basic and medical research because of their highly desirable spectral features, including resistance to photobleaching, high fluorescence quantum yield, high extinction coefficients, and higher light-to-dark toxicity ratios relative to those of other PS agents. In addition, BODIPY dyes can be easily synthesized and post-synthetically modified to tune their photophysical attributes and ROS production. Over the past ten years, scientific literature has described a vast array of synthetic strategies and structures [12,13,14,15,16,17]. For instance, BODIPYs for photodynamic therapy are typically incorporated with heavy atoms and/or transition metals to induce an efficient intersystem crossing (ISC) of molecules from the singlet (S1) to the triplet (T1) state. Additionally, the configuration and presence of rotatable bonds can induce a phototoxic effect [18,19]. The molecule in the triplet state then collides with nearby molecular oxygen simultaneously with energy transfer, elevating the molecular oxygen to its singlet state. Singlet oxygen (1O2) is cytotoxic to cancer cells. Photodynamic therapy combined with diagnosis using fluorescence imaging is the future of advanced theragnostic applications [20]. Hence, photosensitizers that generate 1O2 while also functioning as fluorescent probes are in high demand.
Cellular localization plays a critical function in determining the success of PSs in PDT applications. Owing to its highly hydrophobic core, BODIPY lacks selectivity for cancer cells. Thus, it is necessary to functionalize BODIPY analogs to improve their effectiveness in targeting cancer cells while retaining their PDT efficiency and excellent bioimaging capability. Several mitochondria-targeting probes typically employ lipophilic and cationic moieties, including organic phosphine salts [21], mitochondria-targeting peptides [22], and quaternary ammonium salts [23]. Moreover, incorporating cations in BODIPY dyes not only imparts hydrophilicity but also affords organelle-targeting ability. The targeting effect of these molecules depends on the negative membrane potential of the inner mitochondrial membrane, which leads to their accumulation in the mitochondrial matrix through an inverse concentration gradient [21]. Herein, the cationic moiety is generated by the quaternization of the dimethylamine group at the meso position. Cationic BODIPY with an N,N,N-trimethylamino group at the meso position has been shown to produce 1O2; however, it needs to interact with micelles to reduce vibrational decay in order to show a significant photodynamic effect [24]. In addition, halogenation at positions two and six of the BODIPY core is a recognized strategy for imparting photodynamic activity via the heavy-atom effect [25]. Moreover, as far as the authors know, this is the first report on the use of diaminophenyl-functionalized BODIPY and its quaternized form in cell imaging and photodynamic therapy. Nonetheless, BODIPY dyes have also been used as optical pH sensors. The results described herein fill the gap in the functionality of this type of BODIPY dye.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
All chemicals were acquired commercially. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3·Et2O), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 4-(Dimethylamine)benzaldehyde, and 2,4-Dimethylpyrrole were procured from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). N-Bromosuccinimide (NBS) and N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) were obtained from TCI Chemicals (Tokyo, Japan). 2,3-Dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) was sourced from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA). N,N-Diethylethanamine (TEA), iodomethane, sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3), and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) were obtained from Daejung Chemical (Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea). Analytical grade solvents were used and distilled before the experiments as needed.
2.2. Synthesis of Cationic BODIPY Dyes
2.2.1. Acid-Catalyzed Condensation Reaction (BODIPY H1)
The same synthetic route based on our previous publication was followed to obtain the BODIPY dye H1 [26]. 4-(Dimethylamine)benzaldehyde (0.58 g, 4.73 mmol) and 2, 4-Dimethylpyrrole (0.9 g, 9.46 mmol) were dissolved in dried CH2Cl2 (120 mL) under Argon gas at room temperature. This was followed by the immediate addition of a catalytic amount of TFA. After stirring overnight, DDQ (1.07 g, 4.73 mmol) was dissolved in distilled CH2Cl2 and injected dropwise into the solution. After 2 h, TEA (4 mL) was slowly injected into the mixture, followed by the addition of BF3·Et2O (4.5 mL) in a similar manner. The reaction was quenched after 1.5 h, and the crude product was extracted with CH2Cl2. Then, the organic fraction was dried with MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated until dry. BODIPY H1 was isolated by silica gel column chromatography as a yellow-red solid.
H1: (Yield: 260.1 mg, 18.2%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.07 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz,2Ar-H), 6.79 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 5.97 (s, 2H, 2Ar-H), 3.02 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 2.55 (s, 6H, 2CH3), and 1.48 (s, 6H, 2CH3) ppm.
2.2.2. Halogenation Reactions (BODIPY Br1 and I1)
The C-2 and C-6 positions of the BODIPY dye H1 were halogenated using either NBS or NIS. Briefly, 1.0 eq of H1 was dissolved in distilled CH2Cl2 at room temperature. Thereafter, 3.0 eq of either NBS or NIS was added to the reaction. When the reaction was finished, the solvent was evaporated, and the halogenated Br1 and I1 products were isolated using column chromatography with silica gel, respectively.
Br1: (Yield: 79.7 mg, 55.8%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 6.80 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 3.04 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 2.60 (s, 6H, 2CH3), and 1.49 (s, 6H, 2CH3) ppm.
I1: (Yield: 137.5 mg, 81.6%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 6.80 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 3.05; (s, 6H, 2CH3), 2.64 (s, 6H, 2CH3), and 1.50 (s, 6H, 2CH3) ppm.
2.2.3. Methylation Reaction (AmH, AmBr and AmI)
Methylation reactions of the dimethylamine moiety at the meso position were carried out by dissolving BODIPY precursors (H1, Br1, and I1, respectively) with 2 mL iodomethane in 5 mL anhydrous acetonitrile. The reaction was kept stirring at room temperature for two days before being purified by column chromatography using aluminum oxide.
AmH: (Yield: 50.0 mg, 60.0%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 8.15 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 7.69 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 6.11 (s, 2H, 2Ar-H), 3.76 (s, 9H, 3CH3), 2.50 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 1.41 (s, 6H, 2CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 157.48, 149.39, 144.25, 140.43, 138.62, 131.82, 122.71, 122.51, 57.87, and 14.86 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z 382.2267, calculated mass for C22H27BF2IN3 382.28
AmBr: (Yield: 80.0 mg, 79.0%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 8.30 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 7.60 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 4.11 (s, 9H, 3CH3), 2.61 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 1.33 (s, 6H, 2CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 154.92, 140.13, 132.80, 131.79, 121.93, 112.45, 57.98, 44.38, 27.33, and 14.08 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z 540.0468, calculated mass for C22H25BBr2F2IN3 540.07.
AmI: (Yield: 120.0 mg, 71.0%) 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 8.16 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 7.67 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, 2Ar-H), 3.74 (s, 9H, 3CH3), 2.54 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 1.36 (s, 6H, 2CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 138.47, 131.88, 122.92, 113.71, 57.94, 40.48, 27.28, 17.71, 16.46, and 16.28 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z 634.0198, calculated mass for C22H25BF2I3N3 634.07.
2.3. Spectroscopic Measurements
2.3.1. Structural Characterization
The structures of BODIPY dyes were confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy using a Bruker AM250 spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA) at 300 MHz frequency with TMS as a reference at 25 °C. The high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HR-ESI-MS) data of the dyes was measured using SYNAPT G2-Si high-definition mass spectrometer (Wilmslow, UK).
2.3.2. Spectroscopic and Photophysical Properties
The steady-state absorption spectra of the dyes were measured at room temperature on a spectrophotometer (LAMBDA 25; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and a fluorometer (LS-55; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), respectively. For the measurements, the sample solution was contained in a quartz cuvette with an optical path length of 1 cm. The fluorescence quantum yield (ΦF) was calculated by a comparative method based on the following equation:
(1) |
where A stands for the optical density at the excitation wavelength, E refers to the integrated fluorescence intensity, and n is the refractive index of the solvent used. The superscripts R and S represent reference and sample, respectively. Rhodamine 6G (ΦF = 0.95 in ethanol) was used as a reference.
2.3.3. Singlet Oxygen Generation Efficiency
The singlet oxygen quantum yield (ΦΔ) was measured by the photosensitized oxidation of DPBF, which is a 1O2 quencher. A methanolic solution containing DPBF (A410nm~1.0) and AmX dyes was prepared. The optical density of each BODIPY dye was adjusted to be A500nm~0.1 for AmH and A522nm~0.1 for AmBr and AmI. The solution was exposed to a green LED light (λmax = 500 nm or 522 nm) with an intensity of 7 mW cm−2 and a beam diameter of 0.7 cm. The absorption spectrum was obtained periodically between 0–10 min to monitor the attenuation of the absorption band at 410 nm as a result of the photooxidation of DPBF. After assuming the first-order kinetics, the ΦΔ was determined based on the following equation:
(2) |
where m means the slope of the time-dependent absorbance attenuation curve and F (F = 1–10−A) is the factor that corrects for the difference in absorbance between reference and sample. The reference used was Eosin Y (EY, ΦΔ = 0.26 in methanol).
2.4. Cells and Culture Conditions
HeLa and MCF-7 cancer cell lines were supplied by the Korean Cell Line Bank. The cell lines were kept in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS). Penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 mg/mL) were also added to the media as antibiotics (WELGENE Inc., Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea). The cell lines were kept at 37 °C and a 5% CO2 environment.
2.5. Assessment of Cell Proliferation
To evaluate the response of cell lines towards the BODIPY dyes, the colorimetric-based CellTiter 96®® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used. In 96-well plates, HeLa and MCF-7 cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 103 cells/well and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 1 day. Varying doses (0–1600 nM) of BODIPY dyes were applied to the cells for 1 day. Next, the CellTiter 96®® AQueous One Solution Reagent was pipetted into each well of the culture plate, followed by 4-hr incubation. Finally, the absorbance of the solution was measured at 490 nm with an ELISA plate reader (ThermoFisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
2.6. Photodynamic Activity Assay
To assess the cell proliferation of the cancer cell lines with photodynamic treatment, the same aforementioned colorimetric-based assay was used. HeLa and MCF-7 cells were cultured in similar conditions with an extended 2-h incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in the dark. Next, the media were changed with phenol-red free RPMI 1640 and irradiated for 10 min with a green light-emitting diode (LED, 520 nm). The cells were incubated for 24 h. Then, the CellTiter 96®® AQueous One Solution Reagent was added into each well of the culture plate, followed by 4-hr incubation. The absorbance of the solution was measured at 490 nm using an ELISA plate reader (ThermoFisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
2.7. Fluorescence Cell Imaging
HeLa and MCF-7 cells were administered with 1.6 μM BODIPY dyes for 24 h and further incubated for 45 min with the mitochondria-stain MitoTracker Red (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and then treated with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) as a counterstain for 1 h at room temperature. The fluorescent cells were imaged using the Zeiss LSM-700 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Assays were conducted in triplicates (n = 3), and data are presented as means ± standard deviations of the means. Group mean variations were analyzed using Tukey’s test and 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on GraphPad Prism 6 software (San Diego, CA, USA). The averages of the groups were considered significantly different when p < 0.05.
2.9. Theoretical Calculations
Geometry optimization and electronic structure calculations were performed using the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) with the B3LYP functional and the 6-31G(d) basis sets of the Gaussian 16 program package. All DFT and TD-DFT computations were performed using water as solvent. The spin-orbit coupling (SOC) matrix elements were calculated at the B3LYP/ZORA-def2-TZVP level of theory using the ORCA 5.0.1 [27,28] program.
3. Results
3.1. Synthesis of Cationic BODIPY Derivatives
A schematic of the synthesis of cationic BODIPY is shown in Scheme 1. Initially, a trifluoroacetic acid-catalyzed reaction between 2,4-dimethylpyrrole and 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde was performed to produce a highly unstable intermediate, the dipyrromethene hydrochloride salt. Subsequent oxidation by DDQ and complexation in situ with BF3·Et2O produced the BODIPY core H1. In the second step, heavy bromine and iodine atoms were introduced into the 2,6-positions of the BODIPY H1 by employing NBS and NIS as the bromine and iodine sources, respectively. It is well known that the introduction of heavy atoms into BODIPY and aza-BODIPY analogs considerably boosts the spin-orbit coupling of different states. This improves the intersystem crossing efficiency and, as a result, enhances the singlet oxygen quantum yield. By modifying the proportional amounts of succinimides used and the reaction time, the halogenated BODIPY dyes Br1 and I1 were obtained in high yields of 56% and 82%, respectively. The last step quaternizes the dimethylamino moiety of the BODIPY dyes using iodomethane, a common methylation reagent, via a simple SN2 nucleophilic substitution reaction. Three cationic BODIPY derivatives, AmH, AmBr, and AmI, were produced via facile methylation at room temperature in high yields (60%, 79%, and 71%, respectively). In contrast, the previously reported methylation route of AmH uses DMF as a solvent and involves heating the reaction at 40 C for 72 hrs [24]. 1H-NMR spectroscopy was used to characterize all the synthesized BODIPY dyes, whereas additional 13C-NMR and mass spectroscopic characterizations were done on the cationic BODIPY photosensitizers, AmH, AmBr, and AmI (Figures S1–S12 in the Supplementary Material).
3.2. Photophysical Properties and Computational Analysis of Cationic BODIPY Dyes
The photophysical features of the cationic BODIPY derivatives AmH, AmBr, and AmI were measured using UV/Vis absorption and fluorescence. Table 1 summarizes the key absorption and emission parameters, and Figure 1 shows the absorbance and emission spectra of the synthesized cationic BODIPY dyes in methanolic solution; these spectra are similar to those of previously characterized BODIPY dyes [29,30,31]. The synthesized cationic BODIPYs exhibited the typical absorption and emission profiles of conventional BODIPY dyes (Figure 1a): a distinctly tapered absorption band with peaks in the range of 501–536 nm, assigned to the characteristic strong S0 → S1 transition of the BODIPY chromophore [32], and a second, significantly weaker, broad absorption band attributable to the S0 → S2 transition on the short-wavelength side of the spectra [33]. The synthesized dyes also showed BODIPY emission spectra (Figure 1b), which were narrow and mirror images of their absorption spectra, evidencing the homology of the molecular structures of the dyes.
Table 1.
Sample | λabs (nm) a | λemi (nm) b | ΦF c | ΦΔ d |
---|---|---|---|---|
AmH | 501 | 513 | 0.34 | 0.01 |
AmBr | 526 | 546 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
AmI | 536 | 558 | 0.01 | 0.55 |
Notably, the absorption and emission wavelengths of the halogenated BODIPY dyes were red-shifted. This translates into significant bathochromic shifts in the absorption (25–35 nm) and emission (33–45 nm) maxima relative to their non-halogenated counterparts. Moreover, the iodinated BODIPY derivative demonstrated a more dramatic red-shift in its absorption maximum than the brominated counterpart. This was expected because iodine is heavier than bromine and would provide a more noticeable heavy-atom effect on the resulting BODIPY dyes [34]. The fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) of the BODIPY-based dyes were measured against the rhodamine 6G standard (ΦF = 0.95). The fluorescence quantum yields of AmH, AmBr, and AmI are shown in Table 1.
The significant reduction in the reported ΦF for halogenated BODIPY dyes implies that due to the heavy-atom effect, ISC from a singlet to a triplet excited state, which is a prerequisite process for singlet oxygen generation in triplet PSs, occurred more efficiently in the halogenated BODIPY dyes AmBr and AmI than in the non-halogenated AmH. Furthermore, the optimized molecular structures of the BODIPY compounds were utilized to investigate the frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) for further understanding of the electronic effects of halogenation on the BODIPY properties. The calculated photophysical properties are shown in Table S1 (SI). Although the theoretical absorption maxima and spectral shifts were found to be less than the experimental results for all compounds, approximately 70–76 nm less than the experimental results), the qualitative trend was well reproduced by the calculations. The halogenated BODIPYs AmBr and AmI displayed a calculated redshift of 31–41 nm compared to the experimental redshift of 25–35 nm. Moreover, upon comparing the frontier orbitals, the narrowing of the highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gap, as seen in Figure 2, was largely caused by a destabilization of the HOMO induced by the halogens, resulting in enhanced oscillator strength and a red-shift of the absorption band. This was confirmed by the computed oscillator strength and contribution of the frontier orbitals to each transition, as summarized in Table S1. The obtained theoretical and experimental photophysical data indicated that the synthesized cationic BODIPY dyes have the potential for fluorescence cell imaging and photodynamic therapy.
3.3. Singlet Oxygen Generation of Cationic BODIPY Derivatives
The ability of a photosensitizer to generate 1O2 is crucial for its efficacy as a PDT agent. However, most BODIPY-based dyes have low singlet oxygen generative power, largely because of the intramolecular singlet-triplet excited state spin-forbidden electronic transition. For the majority of these dyes, most of the absorbed light energy is retained in singlet excited states (Sn) and dissipated as fluorescence instead of undergoing a singlet-to-triplet (ISC) transition [35]. In addition, the amount of singlet oxygen generated depends on different factors, including the lifetime of the PS triplet state, the ability of the substituents and solvent to quench 1O2, and the energy transfer efficiency from the PS triplet state to the 3O2 ground state [36,37]. Herein, the singlet oxygen quantum yield (ΦΔ) was assessed by monitoring the absorbance of a well-known 1O2 scavenger, 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF), against a reference standard Eosin Y (ΦΔ = 0.26; Figure S13 in the Supplementary Information). As shown in Table 1, the halogenated BODIPY dyes had higher values than their non-halogenated counterparts. Moreover, the iodinated BODIPY AmI incurred higher ΦΔ (0.55) than its brominated analog AmBr (0.13), indicating a more pronounced heavy atom effect induced by the heavier iodine atoms. The heavy-atom effect is further demonstrated in Figure 3a–d, which shows the time-dependent absorption density decay curves and linearly fitted degradation rates for DPBF with BODIPY dyes and standard Eosin Y, respectively. After incubation with the halogenated BODIPYs AmBr and AmI and exposure to LED radiation, DPBF exhibited extensive bleaching. The distinctive absorbance band of DPBF at approximately 424 nm disappeared completely after 10 min of LED exposure. Again, the absorbance band disappeared more abruptly in BODIPY AmI than in BODIPY AmBr, which was attributed to the heavy-atom effect of iodine atoms. In contrast, the AmH control showed no significant DPBF photobleaching capability under identical experimental conditions.
Moreover, theoretical calculations were done to further rationalize the dynamics of the intersystem crossing of BODIPY dyes. It is imperative that the triplet states are generated prior to 1O2 production. Herein, the ΦΔ is correlated with the rate of ISC (kISC). The rate of ISC is represented by the following equation [38]:
(3) |
where HSO is the Hamiltonian for the spin-orbit coupling (SOC), and ΔESn − Tm represents the energy difference between the singlet (Sn) and triplet (Tm) states, respectively. As shown in Equation (1), two parameters are critical to kISC: the SOC matrix element and the ΔESn − Tm involved in the ISC, which have directly and inversely proportional relationships to kISC, respectively. Herein, the optimized molecular geometries of the excited states were used to calculate their energies and the SOC matrix elements for a manifold of Sn − Tm states. As noted by Kasha’s rule [39], the ISC transition from the higher Sn (n > 1) to the triplet states is not likely to be a result of rapid internal conversion; hence, the S1 state was selected for singlet state computations. Plausible photophysical decay pathways and their corresponding transition energies are summarized in Table 2. S1 − T1 and S1 − T3 manifolds have greater SOC values than those of the S1 − T2 manifold for all compounds. Nevertheless, the large energy gaps (>0.65 eV) between these states (∆ES1−T1 and ∆ES1−T3) deter ISC transitions between S1 and Tm (m = 1, 3) states. The T2 state has shown energy closest to the S1 state, suggesting that the S1 − T2 manifold is the most plausible pathway for the ISC transition of cationic BODIPY dyes.
Table 2.
Manifold | a | a | a | b | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AmH | S1 − T1 | 1.52 | 1.40 | 0.74 | |
S1 − T2 | 2.92 | 2.99 | 0.07 | 0.04 | |
S1 − T3 | 4.53 | 1.61 | 0.14 | ||
AmBr | S1 − T1 | 1.52 | 1.19 | 0.86 | |
S1 − T2 | 2.71 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 0.40 | |
S1 − T3 | 4.08 | 1.37 | 0.16 | ||
AmI | S1 − T1 | 1.56 | 1.10 | 3.33 | |
S1 − T2 | 2.66 | 2.67 | 0.01 | 0.99 | |
S1 − T3 | 3.95 | 1.29 | 0.44 |
a Computed using Gaussian 16 at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory for AmH and AmBr. Computed using Gaussian 16 at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ level of theory for AmI. b Computed at the B3LYP/ZORA-def2-TZVP level of theory using the ORCA 5.0.2 program.
Moreover, the magnitudes of ∆E were comparable across all compounds (0.00–0.07 eV), showing that energy difference has a negligible effect on ISC kinetics. In contrast, the SOC parameters for the S1 − T2 manifold significantly varied. For instance, BODIPY AmH showed SOC values of 0.04 cm−1, whereas halogenated BODIPY AmBr and AmI exhibited greater SOC values. These values confirm the heavy-atom effect via spin-orbit perturbation induced by halogen atoms, particularly iodine atoms, incorporated into the BODIPY dyes. The results presented herein reinforce those reported in the literature [40,41].
3.4. Confocal Imaging and Photodynamic Activity of the Cationic BODIPY Dyes
When assessing the prospect of a PDT agent for therapeutic use, cellular viability and cytotoxicity are important factors to consider. In particular, PS exhibited negligible cytotoxicity in the dark and notable toxicity when exposed to light. In this study, the cytotoxicity of cationic BODIPY dyes was evaluated in HeLa and MCF-7 cancer cell lines. The colorimetric-based MTS assay was used to assess cell proliferation. This well-established protocol for assessing cellular viability relies heavily on the reduction of MTS to colored formazan in metabolically viable cells [42]. Cancer cells were initially incubated with BODIPY-containing solutions (0–1600 nM) under normal conditions to evaluate their cytotoxicity. As shown in Figure 4a, all synthesized cationic BODIPY dyes were observed to have negligible toxicity against HeLa cells in the dark, and the cells maintained >90% viability even at the highest dosage of 1600 nM. Similarly, MCF-7 cancer cells incubated with BODIPY dyes showed low cytotoxicity in the dark (Figure S14a in the Supplementary Information). All three BODIPY dyes showed 90% or higher cell viability, even after incubation at the highest concentration (1600 nM). Moreover, non-halogenated BODIPY AmH showed no significant cytotoxic effect on cancer cells, as indicated by its extremely high cell viability, even with light activation. The minimal toxicities demonstrated by the synthesized PS agents under dark conditions, even with the light illumination of AmH, are a potential indication of their excellent biocompatibility.
In contrast, cancer cell viability drastically decreased when incubated with halogenated BODIPY AmBr and AmI and subsequently irradiated with LED at 520 nm for 10 min. As illustrated in Figure 4a, the halogenated BODIPY dyes AmBr and AmI induced significant toxic effects (p < 0.05) on HeLa cells, even at the lowest dosage (50 nM). Also, the degree of produced cytotoxicity intensified as their concentrations increased. For MCF-7 cells, AmBr and AmI induced similar dose-dependent cytotoxicities. MCF-7 cell viability started decreasing after incubation with 50 nM BODIPY dye, and cytotoxicity increased at higher concentrations (Figure S14a). Table 3 summarizes the IC50 values for halogenated BODIPYs. The calculated IC50 values revealed that both compounds had similar phototoxic effects. The considerably lower IC50 for AmI compared to AmBr can be attributed to the higher production of highly toxic 1O2. These PDT results correspond with the fluorescence and singlet oxygen quantum yield measurements of the dyes, as reported in Table 1. Notably, the IC50 values herein are comparable to those of similarly halogenated BODIPYs but without the cationic group at the meso position previously reported by Gorbe et al. [25].
Table 3.
HeLa | MCF-7 | |
---|---|---|
AmBr | 64.54 ± 3.00 | 48.57 ± 3.51 |
AmI | 59.27 ± 0.53 | 49.35 ± 0.52 |
Morphological analysis of the active mitochondria was also performed using fluorescent bioimaging to show the cell imaging abilities of the synthesized cationic BODIPY dyes using HeLa and MCF-7 cells. After treatment with cationic BODIPY dyes, the fluorescence of cancer cell lines was examined and captured using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). All the synthesized BODIPY dyes readily entered HeLa and MCF-7 cancer cells and generated intense green fluorescence in both cells, as shown in Figure 4b and Figure S14b (Supplementary Information), respectively, demonstrating the excellent bioimaging capabilities of the synthesized dyes. Moreover, MitoTracker Red and DAPI easily entered the cancer cells and produced clear bioimages. According to the merged images, the intracellular emission by the mitochondria tracker overlapped with that of the synthesized BODIPY dyes. Interestingly, green fluorescent images can be observed in the cancer cells treated with AmBr and AmI in spite of the significant heavy-atom effect brought about by the two halogen atoms. The symmetric orientation of the halogen atoms in the halogenated BODIPY dyes neutralizes the halogenation-induced charge transfer character to bring back the initial S1-state property of the parent BODIPY H1, hence, leading to a fluorescence that was more efficient than predicted. Efficient fluorescence imaging of halogenated BODIPYs has been described in our previous publications [30,31].
3.5. Mitochondria-Targeting Ability of the Cationic BODIPY Derivatives
Intracellular colocalization analyses were conducted to evaluate the mitochondria-targeting ability of the synthesized BODIPY derivatives by co-staining cancer cells with cationic BODIPY derivatives and MitoTracker Red which is an established mitochondria-targeting dye. The fluorescence of BODIPY dyes and MitoTracker Red was observed in the green and red channels, respectively. Cancer cells were stained with DAPI, a known cell nucleus-targeting fluorescence marker, as a negative control. Herein, a profiling of the fluorescence intensity line emitted by BODIPY dyes and MitoTracker Red in the mitochondria was analyzed in detail. The fluorescent signals from the BODIPY dyes in HeLa cells corresponded to those of MitoTracker Red, as shown in Figure 5, demonstrating the ability of the synthesized cationic BODIPY dyes to selectively target and localize to mitochondria. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficients calculated based on the fluorescent signals of BODIPY and tracker dye for AmH, AmBr, and AmI are 0.57, 0.30 and 0.18, respectively (Figure 5d). The same fluorescence intensity profiles were observed for the colocalization of BODIPY dyes in MCF-7 cells (Figure S15 in the Supplementary Materials). These findings are in good agreement with previously published literature on cation-containing fluorophores that have dual functionality in PDT and fluorescence imaging [43,44]. The ability of PSs to target cancer cells stems from the fact that their membrane potential is higher in cancer cells than in normal cells [45]. This large gap in the mitochondrial membrane potential accelerates the accumulation of cationic lipophilic compounds, increasing their concentration in the mitochondria by up to 500 times [21]. Overall, the results show that the BODIPY derivatives are feasible compounds to act as excellent agents for fluorescence bioimaging and as effective PSs that significantly produce triggerable toxicity for the photodynamic treatment of cancer.
4. Conclusions
We synthesized a series of cationic BODIPY dyes and examined their photophysical, mitochondria-targeting, and photodynamic therapeutic capabilities as photosensitizers for cancer therapy. Ammonium-functionalized BODIPY derivatives are water soluble and can generate highly toxic singlet oxygen species. Owing to the heavy-atom effect, the singlet oxygen quantum yields of the halogenated BODIPY dyes, AmBr and AmI, were significantly high (0.13 and 0.55, respectively). Moreover, there was no significant cytotoxicity of the BODIPY dyes after incubating the subject cancer cell lines in the dark. In contrast, halogenated BODIPYs showed superior and dose-dependent cytotoxicity upon irradiation of all cancer cells under investigation while also displaying excellent mitochondrial-targeting ability, demonstrating their suitability as photosensitizers for photodynamic cancer therapy. Overall, the results described herein present an effective strategy to synthesize mitochondria-targeting BODIPY dyes with PDT potential and provide insight into the development and application of these dyes as more efficient BODIPY-based PDT photosensitizers.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics15051512/s1. Figure S1. 1H-NMR spectrum of H1. Figure S2. 1H-NMR spectrum of Br1. Figure S3. 1H-NMR spectrum of I1. Figure S4. 1H-NMR spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmH. Figure S5. 13C-NMR spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmH. Figure S6. HR-ESI mass spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmH. Figure S7. 1H-NMR spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmBr. Figure S8. 13C-NMR spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmBr. Figure S9. HR-ESI mass spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmBr. Figure S10. 1H-NMR spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmI. Figure S11. 13C-NMR spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmI. Figure S12. HR-ESI mass spectrum of cationic BODIPY AmI. Table S1. Transition energy (E), wavelength (λ), and oscillator strength (f) for the lowest singlet excited state of BODIPY PSs and the contribution of frontier orbitals to each transition. Figure S13. (a,b) Time-dependent absorption spectra of air-saturated methanol solution of DPBF containing EY under green LED light irradiation (500 nm and 522 nm, 7 mW cm−2). (c,d) Temporal change in the absorbance of DPBF at 410 nm plotted according to the first order kinetics (dots) with linear fits (line) in semilogarithmic scale. Legend: EY: Eosin Y. Figure S14. (a) Cell proliferation (% of control) of MCF-7 cancer cell lines under dark and light conditions; (b) CLSM images of MCF-7 cell line after a 24-h incubation with the BODIPY dyes (1.6 μM) with MitoTracker Red and DAPI as co-stain. Figure S15. Fluorescence micrographs of MCF-7 cells co-stained with MitoTracker Red and their corresponding fluorescence intensity profiles along the region of interest marked by a white arrow for BODIPYs (a) AmH, (b) AmBr, and (c) AmI. The green topographic profile corresponds to each BODIPY dye while the red one is for MitoTracker Red.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.Y., S.K.Y. and H.-J.K.; synthesis, I.W.B.; investigation, C.K. and S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, I.W.B. and J.-P.J.; writing—review and editing, T.P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was performed with financial support from the research funds provided by Chosun University in 2017.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Huang H., Yu B., Zhang P., Huang J., Chen Y., Gasser G., Ji L., Chao H. Highly charged ruthenium (II) polypyridyl complexes as lysosome-localized photosensitizers for two-photon photodynamic therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:14049–14052. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lv W., Zhang Z., Zhang K.Y., Yang H., Liu S., Xu A., Guo S., Zhao Q., Huang W. A mitochondria-targeted photosensitizer showing improved photodynamic therapy effects under hypoxia. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:9947–9951. doi: 10.1002/anie.201604130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lu K., He C., Lin W. Nanoscale metal–organic framework for highly effective photodynamic therapy of resistant head and neck cancer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:16712–16715. doi: 10.1021/ja508679h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Xiang Z., Zhu L., Qi L., Yan L., Xue Y., Wang D., Chen J.F., Dai L. Two-dimensional fully conjugated polymeric photosensitizers for advanced photodynamic therapy. Chem. Mater. 2016;28:8651–8658. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nowak-Król A., Grzybowski M., Romiszewski J., Drobizhev M., Wicks G., Chotkowski M., Rebane A., Górecka E., Gryko D.T. Strong two-photon absorption enhancement in a unique bis-porphyrin bearing a diketopyrrolopyrrole unit. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:8368–8370. doi: 10.1039/c3cc44728f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Poß M., Zittel E., Seidl C., Meschkov A., Muñoz L., Schepers U., Feldmann C. Gd43+[AlPCS4]34− nanoagent generating 1O2 for photodynamic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28:1801074. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201801074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ji C., Gao Q., Dong X., Yin W., Gu Z., Gan Z., Zhao Y., Yin M. A size-reducible nanodrug with an aggregation-enhanced photodynamic effect for deep chemo-photodynamic therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57:11384–11388. doi: 10.1002/anie.201807602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang L., Li Z., Zhao Y., Yang J., Yang Y., Pendharkar A.I., Zhang Y., Kelmar S., Chen L., Wu W., et al. Enhancing photodynamic therapy through resonance energy transfer constructed near-infrared photosensitized nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1604789. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Awuah S.G., You Y. Boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY)-based photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. RSC Adv. 2012;2:11169–11183. doi: 10.1039/c2ra21404k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kamkaew A., Lim S.H., Lee H.B., Kiew L.V., Chung L.Y., Burgess K. BODIPY dyes in photodynamic therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:77–88. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35216H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Agazzi M.L., Ballatore M.B., Durantini A.M., Durantini E.N., Tome A.C. BODIPYs in antitumoral and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: An integrating review. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2019;40:21–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wood T.E., Thompson A. Advances in the chemistry of dipyrrins and their complexes. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:1831–1861. doi: 10.1021/cr050052c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zatsikha Y.V., Yakubovskyi V.P., Shandura M.P., Dubey I.Y., Kovtun Y.P. An efficient method of chemical modification of BODIPY core. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:2233–2238. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2013.01.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lei H., Han H., Wang G., Mukherjee S., Bian H., Liu J., Zhao C., Fang Y. Self-Assembly of Amphiphilic BODIPY Derivatives on Micropatterned Ionic Liquid Surfaces for Fluorescent Films with Excellent Stability and Sensing Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14:13962–13969. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c01417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang J., Fang Y., Dehaen W. Macrocyclic arenes functionalized with BODIPY: Rising stars among chemosensors and smart materials. Chemosensors. 2020;8:51. doi: 10.3390/chemosensors8030051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pang E., Zhao S., Wang B., Niu G., Song X., Lan M. Strategies to construct efficient singlet oxygen-generating photosensitizers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022;472:214780. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214780. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee J.S., Kang N.Y., Kim Y.K., Samanta A., Feng S., Kim H.K., Vendrell M., Park J.H., Chang Y.T. Synthesis of a BODIPY library and its application to the development of live cell glucagon imaging probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:10077–10082. doi: 10.1021/ja9011657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kähärä I., Durandin N., Ilina P., Efimov A., Laaksonen T., Vuorimaa-Laukkanen E., Lisitsyna E. Phototoxicity of BODIPY in long-term imaging can be reduced by intramolecular motion. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2022;21:1677–1687. doi: 10.1007/s43630-022-00250-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prieto-Castañeda A., García-Garrido F., Díaz-Norambuena C., Escriche-Navarro B., García-Fernández A., Bañuelos J., Rebollar E., García-Moreno I., Martínez-Máñez R., de la Moya S., et al. Development of Geometry-Controlled All-Orthogonal BODIPY Trimers for Photodynamic Therapy and Phototheragnosis. Org. Lett. 2022;24:3636–3641. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sarbadhikary P., George B.P., Abrahamse H. Recent advances in photosensitizers as multifunctional theranostic agents for imaging-guided photodynamic therapy of cancer. Theranostics. 2021;11:9054. doi: 10.7150/thno.62479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guo X., Yang N., Ji W., Zhang H., Dong X., Zhou Z., Li L., Shen H.M., Yao S.Q., Huang W. Mito-Bomb: Targeting Mitochondria for Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2007778. doi: 10.1002/adma.202007778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cheng H., Zheng R.R., Fan G.L., Fan J.H., Zhao L.P., Jiang X.Y., Yang B., Yu X.Y., Li S.Y., Zhang X.Z. Mitochondria and plasma membrane dual-targeted chimeric peptide for single-agent synergistic photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials. 2019;188:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang Y., You X., Wang L., Zhang G., Gui S., Jin Y., Zhao R., Zhang D. Pyridinium-Substituted Tetraphenylethylenes Functionalized with Alkyl Chains as Autophagy Modulators for Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem. 2020;132:10128–10137. doi: 10.1002/ange.202001906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Agazzi M.L., Ballatore M.B., Reynoso E., Quiroga E.D., Durantini E.N. Synthesis, spectroscopic properties and photodynamic activity of two cationic BODIPY derivatives with application in the photoinactivation of microorganisms. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017;126:110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gorbe M., Costero A.M., Sancenon F., Martinez-Manez R., Ballesteros-Cillero R., Ochando L.E., Chulvi K., Gotor R., Gil S. Halogen-containing BODIPY derivatives for photodynamic therapy. Dye. Pigment. 2019;160:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Badon I.W., Kim C., Lim J.M., Mai D.K., Vales T.P., Kang D., Cho S., Lee J., Kim H.J., Yang J. Mitochondrion-targeting PEGylated BODIPY dyes for near-infrared cell imaging and photodynamic therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2022;10:1196–1209. doi: 10.1039/D1TB02393D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Neese F. The ORCA program system. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012;2:73–78. doi: 10.1002/wcms.81. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Neese F. Software update: The ORCA program system, version 4.0. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018;8:e1327. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fron E., Coutiño-Gonzalez E., Pandey L., Sliwa M., Van der Auweraer M., De Schryver F.C., Thomas J., Dong Z., Leen V., Smet M., et al. Synthesis and photophysical characterization of chalcogen substituted BODIPY dyes. New J. Chem. 2009;33:1490–1496. doi: 10.1039/b900786e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vales T.P., Cho S., Lee J., Bui H.T., Mai D.K., Badon I.W., Lim H., Jeong W., Kim J.L., Kim H.K., et al. Functionalization of 4, 4-difluoro-4-bora-3a, 4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY)-based photosensitizers with Triphenylphosphonium (TPP) for mitochondria-targeted fluorescence bioimaging and photodynamic therapy. J. Mol. Struct. 2021;1246:131284. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.131284. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Khuong Mai D., Kang B., Pegarro Vales T., Badon I.W., Cho S., Lee J., Kim E., Kim H.J. Synthesis and photophysical properties of tumor-targeted water-soluble BODIPY photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Molecules. 2020;25:3340. doi: 10.3390/molecules25153340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhu S., Zhang J., Vegesna G., Luo F.T., Green S.A., Liu H. Highly water-soluble neutral BODIPY dyes with controllable fluorescence quantum yields. Org. Lett. 2011;13:438–441. doi: 10.1021/ol102758z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sun H., Dong X., Liu S., Zhao Q., Mou X., Yang H.Y., Huang W. Excellent BODIPY dye containing dimesitylboryl groups as PeT-based fluorescent probes for fluoride. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011;115:19947–19954. doi: 10.1021/jp206396v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gorman A., Killoran J., O’Shea C., Kenna T., Gallagher W.M., O’Shea D.F. In vitro demonstration of the heavy-atom effect for photodynamic therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:10619–10631. doi: 10.1021/ja047649e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sun Y., Qu Z., Zhou Z., Gai L., Lu H. Thieno [3, 2-b] thiophene fused BODIPYs: Synthesis, near-infrared luminescence and photosensitive properties. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019;17:3617–3622. doi: 10.1039/C9OB00030E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fujishiro R., Sonoyama H., Ide Y., Fujimura T., Sasai R., Nagai A., Mori S., Kaufman N.E., Zhou Z., Vicente M.G.H., et al. Synthesis, photodynamic activities, and cytotoxicity of new water-soluble cationic gallium (III) and zinc (II) phthalocyanines. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019;192:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2018.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Demirbaş Ü., Pişkin M., Barut B., Bayrak R., Durmuş M., Kantekin H. Metal-free, zinc (II) and lead (II) phthalocyanines functioning with 3-(2H-benzo [d][1, 2, 3] triazol-2-yl)-4-hydroxyphenethyl methacrylate groups: Synthesis and investigation of photophysical and photochemical properties. Synth. Met. 2016;220:276–285. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.06.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen Y.L., Li S.W., Chi Y., Cheng Y.M., Pu S.C., Yeh Y.S., Chou P.T. Switching luminescent properties in osmium-based β-diketonate complexes. ChemPhysChem. 2005;6:2012–2017. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200500252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kasha M. Characterization of electronic transitions in complex molecules. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1950;9:14–19. doi: 10.1039/df9500900014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lower S.K., El-Sayed M.A. The triplet state and molecular electronic processes in organic molecules. Chem. Rev. 1966;66:199–241. doi: 10.1021/cr60240a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yuster P., Weissman S.I. Effects of perturbations on phosphorescence: Luminescence of metal organic complexes. J. Chem. Phys. 1949;17:1182–1188. doi: 10.1063/1.1747140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Choi K.H., Wang K.K., Shin E.P., Oh S.L., Jung J.S., Kim H.K., Kim Y.R. Water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with photosensitizer for photocatalytic application. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011;115:3212–3219. doi: 10.1021/jp1085137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Watley R.L., Awuah S.G., Bio M., Cantu R., Gobeze H.B., Nesterov V.N., Das S.K., D’Souza F., You Y. Dual functioning thieno-pyrrole fused BODIPY dyes for NIR optical imaging and photodynamic therapy: Singlet oxygen generation without heavy halogen atom assistance. Chem. Asian J. 2015;10:1335–1343. doi: 10.1002/asia.201500140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Qi S., Kwon N., Yim Y., Nguyen V.N., Yoon J. Fine-tuning the electronic structure of heavy-atom-free BODIPY photosensitizers for fluorescence imaging and mitochondria-targeted photodynamic therapy. Chem. Sci. 2020;11:6479–6484. doi: 10.1039/D0SC01171A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liang H.F., Chen C.T., Chen S.C., Kulkarni A.R., Chiu Y.L., Chen M.C., Sung H.W. Paclitaxel-loaded poly (γ-glutamic acid)-poly (lactide) nanoparticles as a targeted drug delivery system for the treatment of liver cancer. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2051–2059. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.