Abstract
Despite the importance of the mouse in biomedical research, the levels of circulating gonadal steroids across the estrous cycle are not established with any temporal precision. Using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, now considered the gold standard for steroid hormone analysis, we aimed to generate a detailed profile of gonadal steroid levels across the estrous cycle of C57BL/6J mice. For reference, luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin concentrations were measured in the same samples by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Terminal blood samples were collected at 8-hour intervals (10 Am, 6 Pm, 2 Am) throughout the 4 stages of the estrous cycle. As expected, the LH surge was detected at 6 Pm on proestrus with a mean (±SEM) concentration of 11 ± 3 ng/mL and occurred coincident with the peak in progesterone levels (22 ± 4 ng/mL). Surprisingly, estradiol concentrations peaked at 10 Am on diestrus (51 ± 8 pg/mL), with levels on proestrus 6 Pm reaching only two-thirds of this value (31 ± 5 pg/mL). We also observed a proestrus peak in prolactin concentrations (132.5 ± 17 ng/mL) that occurred earlier than expected at 2 Am. Estrone and androstenedione levels were often close to the limit of detection (LOD) and showed no consistent changes across the estrous cycle. Testosterone levels were rarely above the LOD (0.01 ng/mL). These observations provide the first detailed assessment of fluctuating gonadal steroid and reproductive hormone levels across the mouse estrous cycle and indicate that species differences exist between mice and other spontaneously ovulating species.
Keywords: estradiol, progesterone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin
The gonadal steroid hormones have a key regulatory role in controlling reproductive function while also exerting an important modulatory influence on the activity of almost all other organ systems (1). The hypothalamo-pituitary axis drives marked fluctuations in estrogens and progesterone across the ovarian cycle of mammals. In women, the menstrual cycle typically lasts 28 days and consists of follicular, ovulatory, and luteal phases with well-defined stereotypic patterns and levels of circulating reproductive hormones (2). In rodents, the estrous cycle lasts 4 to 5 days and can be divided into metestrus, diestrus, proestrus, and estrus phases (3). The profiles of reproductive hormones are also clearly documented for the rat estrous cycle (4, 5). However, this is not the case for mice, for which, despite their widespread use in biomedical research, the estrous cycle profiles of circulating estrogens and progesterone are not well established.
The lack of reliable data in the mouse is primarily due to the limitations of steroid hormone immunoassays that include low sensitivity and nonspecificity due to cross-reactivity of structurally similar steroid precursors and metabolites. General concerns regarding the specificity of immunoassays for measuring gonadal steroids have been highlighted by academic and clinical communities (6‐8) with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) now considered to be the gold standard for steroid hormone analysis (9). Nevertheless, prior LC- and gas chromatography (GC)-MS investigations have struggled to detect 17β-estradiol (E2) in mice (10‐12). To our knowledge, only a single study has been able to evaluate estrogens and progesterone across the mouse estrous cycle using MS, albeit with GC-MS (13). While valuable, that study examined only a single time point for each day of the cycle.
The present investigation aimed to address the lack of information on circulating gonadal steroid concentrations in cycling female mice by using ultrasensitive LC-MS to measure estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), progesterone (P4), testosterone (T), and androstenedione (A4) at 8-hour intervals across the 4-day estrous cycle of C57BL/6J mice. For reference, we also measured luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin in the same samples by enzyme-linked immune assay (ELISA).
Materials and Methods
Animals
C57BL/6J female mice (aged >8 weeks), obtained from Charles River, were group-housed in individually ventilated cages under controlled conditions (12:12-hours light/dark cycle, lights on at 05:30 hours, 25 °C) with environmental enrichment and ad libitum access to food (RM1-P, SDS) and water. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the UK Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (P174441DE) and approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the University of Cambridge.
Staging of Smears
Vaginal smear samples were collected every morning at approximately 10 Am for at least 3 consecutive cycles to ensure each mouse was actively progressing through the estrous cycle and to determine the cycle stage at death. Mice that displayed irregular cycles were excluded from analysis. The smears were collected by flushing 8 μL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) into the vaginal orifice and then collecting the fluid and transferring it to a glass slide to air dry before staining with filtered Giemsa (1:1 in water) and examining under a light microscope. Smear stages were determined by the distribution of leukocytes, nucleated, or cornified cells as reported by Ajayi and Akhigbe (14). As mice can exhibit 1 or 2 days of estrus smears, estrus was defined here as mice exhibiting their first estrous smear after proestrus. The vaginal smears were assessed blindly by 2 independent investigators (EGW, SHY) with 99% agreement. Representative images of estrous, metestrous, diestrous, and proestrus smears are shown in (Fig. 1). Estrus was classified by the presence of predominantly cornified cells (Fig. 1A). During metestrus, cornified cells are present and the epithelium starts to become invaded by leukocytes (Fig. 1B). The number of leukocytes becomes more abundant in diestrus (Fig. 1C), although a reduction is seen in late diestrus alongside a small number of nucleated and cornified cells (Fig. 1D). Proestrus typically consists of a small number of cornified cells with many nucleated epithelial cells present (Fig. 1E).
Figure 1.
Vaginal cytology of estrous stage smears. A, estrus is represented by cornified epithelial cells; B, metestrus is represented by the presence of cornified epithelial cells and leukocytes; C, early diestrus is represented by a dense appearance of leukocytes; D, late diestrus is represented by a scattered appearance of leukocytes and a small number of nucleated epithelial cells; and E, proestrus is represented by nucleated epithelial cells and often a small number of cornified epithelial cells. Scale bar represents 20 μm.
Terminal Blood Collection
Terminal blood sampling was performed at 8-hour intervals throughout the 4 stages of the estrous cycle. Mice ranged between age 11 and 19 weeks and weighed 16.9 to 25.7 g at the time of terminal blood sampling. The proestrus LH surge occurs approximately 30 minutes after lights off (15). To capture this, a 6 Pm time point was chosen with the 8-hour sampling centered around this at 2 Am and 10 Am. Immediately before terminal bleeding, an additional vaginal smear sample was taken. A lethal dose of pentobarbital (Dolethal, 400 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) was administered and blood was collected within 1 minute from the inferior vena cava using a 1-mL syringe flushed with EDTA to prevent coagulation of the blood. Whole blood (approximately 400 μL) was collected and immediately centrifuged at 4 °C, relative centrifugal force 1600g for 5 minutes. The plasma supernatant was collected, and the pellet was discarded. Plasma for LH ELISA (8 μL) was diluted in (112 μL) 1× PBS with 0.05% Tween, snap-frozen, and stored at −4 °C. Plasma for prolactin (10 μL) and gonadal steroid (100 μL) was snap-frozen and stored at −80 °C before analysis by LC-MS at the ANZAC institute. The degree of dilation of the uterine horns was recorded at death.
Liquid Chromatograph–Mass Spectrometry
The levels of T, A2, E2, E1, and P4 were analyzed using an ultrasensitive LC-MS (16). In brief, hormones were measured in mouse plasma by ultrapressure LC-MS in a single batch using a novel, estrogen-selective derivatizing reagent 1,2-dimethylimidazole-5-sulfonyl chloride (DMIS) (17, 18). Aliquots (100 µL) of plasma together with standards (E2 and P4, Cerillant; T, National Measurement Institute) and quality control samples were fortified with deuterated d4-estradiol (Cambridge Isotope Lab), d9-progesterone (CDN Isotopes), and d3-testosterone (NMI) as internal standard, extracted with 1 mL of methyl tert-butyl ether into the organic layer separated from the lower aqueous layer by freezing. Dried extracts were resuspended in sodium bicarbonate buffer and derivatized by addition of DMIS in acetone followed by transfer into a 96-well microtiter plate for 40-μL injection into LC-MS. Chromatography (Restek force biphenyl column, 100 mm × 3.0 mm × 1.8 µm) using a mobile phase flow of 0.5 mL/min, column temperature 45 °C using a mixture of A, water, and B, methanol solutions at 40% B for 0 to 1 minute, 80% to 90% B over 1.0 to 5.0 minutes, 100% B over 5.01 to 9.50 minutes, and 40% B over 9.51 to 11.0 minutes. Over a run time of 11 minutes, T appeared at 5.74 minutes, E2 at 6.31 minutes, and P4 at 7.65 minutes. Eluant was introduced into a mass spectrometer (API 5000 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer) equipped with an atmospheric pressure photoionization source using negative ionization for E2 (quantifier transition 271->145) and positive ionization for T (289->109) and P4 (315->97). For E2, P4, and T, extraction recoveries were 88% to 97% with limits of detection (LODs), limits of quantitation, and within-run reproducibility (10 replicates) for E2 were (0.25 pg/mL, 0.5 pg/mL, 5%-8%), for P4 (0.02 ng/L, 0.05 ng/mL, 2%-5%), and for T (10 pg/mL, 25 pg/mL, 4%-8%). Spike-recovery of E2, P4, and T into mouse serum (4 spike levels, 16 replicates) demonstrated high recovery and precision for E2 (pooled serum samples 107%, 1.2%-4.7%), P4 (96%, 2.3%-6.2%), and T (111%, 3.4%-5.4%).
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
The sandwich ELISA of Steyn and colleagues (19) was used to measure LH. A standard curve was generated using a serial dilution of mouse LH (reference preparation, AFP-5306A; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Hormone and Pituitary Program (NIDDK-NHPP) in PBS-T supplemented with 0.2% bovine serum albumin. Primary antibody (polyclonal rabbit anti-LH antiserum, 1:10 000, AFP-240580Rb, RRID:AB_2665533) was purchased from Harbor-UCLS and capture antibody (monoclonal anti-bovine LH beta antisera, 1:1000, catalog No. 518B7, RRID:AB_2756886) was purchased from UC Davis. The secondary antibody (polyclonal goat anti-rabbit antisera, 1:1000, catalog No. P0448, RRID:AB_2617138) was purchased from DAKO Cytomation. The assay sensitivity was 0.03 ng/mL, with intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation of 4.4% and 24%, respectively.
Similarly, a previously established sandwich ELISA was used to measure plasma prolactin concentrations (20, 21). Reference standard (PRL: 4 μg/mL, AFP6476C, NIDDK-NHPP) was used to generate standard curves ranging from 20 to 0.019 ng/mL by dilution in 0.2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in PBS-T. Primary antibody (Rabbit anti-mouse PRL, 1:50,000, AFP131078, RRID:AB_2810968 NIDDK-NHPP) and capture antibody (Guinea pig anti-rat PRL, 1:2500, AFP65191, RRID:AB_2756841 NIDDK-NHPP) were purchased from the National Institutes of Health Hormone and Pituitary Program. The secondary antibody was purchased from GE Healthcare Life Sciences (Amersham ECL Rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Ab (from donkey), NA934 RRID:AB_772206; used at 1:2000 dilution). The assay sensitivity was 0.04 ng/mL, with intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation of less than 10%.
Statistical Analysis
All statistics were performed using (GraphPad Prism 9). Gonadal hormone levels were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc Tukey test. The threshold level for statistical significance was set at P less than .05 with data presented as mean ± SEM. Samples below the LOD were set at LOD/√2 (22).
Results
All mice displaying regular 4- or 5-day estrous cycles were included in the analysis except for the proestrus 6 Pm time point, for which only mice exhibiting evidence of an LH surge (LH > 2.0 ng/mL) were used. As proestrus mice exhibit a wide variation in the times at which they initiate the LH surge (15), we included only mice that had commenced the LH surge at 6 Pm to maintain consistency around this key time point in the grouped data. All such mice also exhibited greatly dilated uterine horns.
The number of animals (N) for each time point were as follows: estrus 2 Am (n = 7), 10 Am (n = 4), 6 Pm (n = 5); metestrus, 2 Am (n = 4), 10 Am (n = 5), 6 Pm (n = 4); diestrus, 2 Am (n = 9), 10 Am (n = 6), 6 Pm (n = 11); and proestrus, 2 Am (n = 6), 10 Am (n = 8), 6 pm (n = 8).
Luteinizing Hormone
Mean plasma LH concentrations did not differ significantly between any time points during metestrus, diestrus, and estrus. The mean basal levels for these time points ranged from 0.108 to 0.755 ng/mL. However, LH levels were significantly augmented during the proestrus 6 Pm time point with a mean concentration of 10.66 ± 2.99 ng/mL. These levels were statistically significant compared to all other stages and time points (P < .0001; ANOVA with post hoc Tukey (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
Levels of gonadal and productive hormones across the mouse estrous cycle measured using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Estradiol (E2) levels on diestrus 10 Am are statistically significant compared to all other time points except metestrus 10 Am and proestrus 6 Pm. Progesterone (P4) on proestrus 6 Pm is statistically significant compared to all other time points. Luteinizing hormone (LH) on proestrus 6 Pm is statistically significant compared to all other data points. Prolactin (Prl) on proestrus 2 Am is statistically significant compared to all other time points except proestrus 6 Pm. N = 4-11/time point (see text). Gray shaded area represents lights off. Mean ± SEM. Analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey; *P less than .05.
Prolactin
Mean plasma prolactin concentrations fluctuated around 50 ng/mL and tended to be slightly higher during the day of proestrus compared with earlier days in the cycle, but this did not reach statistical significance. Unexpectedly, however, we observed a large nocturnal peak of prolactin (132 ± 17 ng/mL) at 2 Am on proestrus. Peak levels at this time point were statistically significant compared to all other time points except 6 Pm on proestrus (P < .05; ANOVA with post hoc Tukey (see Fig. 2).
Gonadal Steroid Hormones
The concentration of P4 peaked at 6 Pm proestrus (21.94 ± 3.78 ng/mL) (see Fig. 2). These levels were statistically significant to all other time points (P < .0001; ANOVA with post hoc Tukey). A trend toward an increase in P4 was observed at estrus 10 Am and 6 Pm, metestrus 10 Am and 6 Pm, and diestrus 2 Am, however, these were not statistically significant. The lowest levels of P4 were observed at 10 Am diestrus (0.42 ± 0.11 ng/mL) (see Fig. 2).
Peak E2 levels were detected at 10 Am diestrus (51.39 ± 7.67 pg/mL), with E2 levels at 6 Pm proestrus being approximately two-thirds this value (30.51 ± 5.30 pg/mL) (see Fig. 2). The elevated E2 concentrations observed at 10 Am diestrus were significantly different from all other time points except metestrus 10 Am and proestrus 10 Am (P < .05-P < .001; ANOVA with post hoc Tukey) (see Fig. 2). The levels of E1 followed a similar pattern to E2 however many values were below the LOD (0.5 pg/mL). Like E2, the concentration of E1 peaked at diestrus 10 Am (14.64 ± 4.32 pg/mL); however, this showed no statistically significant changes across the estrous cycle (Fig. 3A).
Figure 3.
Levels of A, estrone, and B, androstenedione across the mouse estrous cycle measured using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. The gray dotted line represents the LOD/√2. N = 4-11/group. Mean ± SEM. LOD, limit of detection.
Mice (N = 3) that failed to exhibit an LH surge (0.73 ± 0.36 ng/mL) at 6 Pm proestrus displayed low levels of P4 (1.24 ± 0.72 ng/mL) and levels of E2 similar to that of surging mice (37.14 ± 20.98 pg/mL).
Virtually all levels of T were below the LOD (0.01 ng/mL). The levels of A4 were often below the LOD (0.05 ng/mL) and showed no statistically significant change across the cycle (Fig. 3B).
Discussion
These observations provide the first detailed assessment of gonadal steroid hormone levels across the female mouse estrous cycle using LC-MS. Whereas LH and P4 levels peaked at 6 Pm on proestrus as expected, and in accordance with rats (4, 5), we found that E2 concentrations were at their highest at 10 Am on diestrus and not during proestrus. We also observed an unexpected peak of prolactin concentrations at 2 Am on proestrus, 16 hours after the peak of E2 levels and 16 hours before the preovulatory LH surge.
There is wide agreement from human and rat investigations that E2 levels gradually rise across the follicular/diestrous stages to peak the afternoon or evening of the ovulatory/proestrus phase before falling during the luteal/estrous stage (23). Remarkably, we report here that E2 levels in the C57BL/6J mouse peak on diestrus, the day before ovulation. Using the same LC-MS method, we have previously reported that, as expected, E2 levels are undetectable in ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice (16, 24). With respect to the surprisingly low E2 levels on the afternoon of proestrus, we note that all the 6 Pm proestrus samples had markedly elevated LH and P4 levels, providing proof that these samples were all correctly assigned.
Prior studies using a variety of different assays have reported inconsistent profiles for E2 across the estrous cycle of the mouse. The GC-MS study by Nilsson and colleagues (13) found E2 levels in C57BL/6 mice were the same on proestrus and diestrus but elevated at those times compared to estrus and metestrus. A study using commercial immunoassays in C57BL/6 mice reported E2 levels to be at their peak during estrus (17). In contrast, investigations in Swiss albino and CD-1 mice using ELISA and other immunoassays found maximal E2 levels on proestrus (18, 25). A major caveat for all of these studies is that only a single time point was measured for each day of the cycle. Our present observations showing marked differences between 8-hour time points on the same day indicate the danger of using single-day measurements.
It is interesting to consider the physiological ramifications of E2 reaching peak concentration on diestrus rather than proestrus in C57BL/6 mice. The rise in estrogens is particularly important in providing estrogen-positive feedback to the hypothalamo-pituitary axis to evoke the preovulatory LH surge (26, 27). This is considered to represent a classic genomic mode of estrogen action operating through the ESR1 transcription factor (28, 29). Accordingly, the surge mechanism requires a long-duration E2 signal but high levels do not need to be present at the time of the surge itself (30, 31). Intriguingly, the seminal studies by Bronson and colleagues that established the current E2 treatment regimens used for positive feedback in mice (32, 33) employ administration of the high E2 dose at 10 Am, 32 hours before surge onset. This would be equivalent to the morning of diestrus, the time at which we find E2 levels to peak during the natural estrous cycle.
The preovulatory rise in E2 is also the primary factor driving elevated prolactin secretion during proestrus in the rat (4, 5). This action appears to involve a direct action of E2 on the lactotrophs of the anterior pituitary gland (34). Estrogen-treated ovariectomized rats will express daily prolactin surges in the afternoon, suggesting the involvement of an additional circadian timing mechanism stimulating prolactin secretion at that time, driven by releasing factors coming from the hypothalamus (35, 36). Previous work has interpreted the absence of an afternoon peak in prolactin in mice to suggest that this second, circadian/hypothalamic contribution to prolactin secretion during the estrous cycle might be lacking in mice, with the prolonged elevation of prolactin seen throughout the day on proestrus likely driven by a pituitary effect of E2. The present data may necessitate a reevaluation of this conclusion, as it might be that the timing of this hypothalamic drive to prolactin secretion is earlier in the cycle, driven by the increase of E2 early on diestrus.
In addition to hormone changes during the estrous cycle, E2 also stimulates changes in behavior. There is clear evidence, for example, that E2 drives an increase in voluntary running-wheel activity in rodents (37). It is interesting to note that cyclical changes in running-wheel activity during the mouse estrous cycle actually peak during the night preceding proestrus (38), that is, the night between diestrus and proestrus. This timing is consistent with the peak in E2 observed in the present study the morning of diestrus.
We find that P4 levels dramatically increase at the time of the LH surge and then fall by the early morning of estrus and remain relatively low for the rest of the cycle. As demonstrated in seminal rat studies, the P4 surge occurs at the same time as the LH surge (4, 5) and a rise in P4 during proestrus has also been demonstrated in MF1 mice using a radioimmunoassay (39). The mechanism responsible for the periovulatory rise in P4 remains unclear and may be dependent on species (40). It is possible that the marked increase in P4 at proestrus 6 Pm is driven by the LH surge in rodents. Granulosa cells in preovulatory follicles respond to LH and produce P4 in mice (41) and are more sensitive to LH the morning of proestrus compared to diestrus (42). A single intravenous injection of LH is known to increase concentrations of P4 in rats within 30 minutes (43). Further, we note here that proestrus mice that were killed at 6 Pm before the onset of their LH surge had low P4 concentrations.
Whereas the proestrus peak in P4 observed here in mice is also observed in rats, we did not observe a statistically significant increase in P4 during estrus/metestrus. There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased levels of P4 at the 10 Am and 6 Pm time points in estrus and metestrus. This may represent fundamental species differences in the organization and roles of the luteal phase and estrous cycle. In humans, following ovulation, the ovarian theca and granulosa cells undergo luteinization to differentiate into luteal cells that form the corpus luteum lasting for approximately 2 weeks and become the primary source of P4 in women (44). In contrast, rodents have a very short-lived corpus luteum. They do not exhibit a true luteal phase as P4 levels from the corpus luteum are not sufficient to stimulate decidualization and are rapidly converted to an inactive form 20a-hydroxyprogesterone (45). Rats do however exhibit a second smaller peak in P4 between late metestrus and early diestrus (4, 5). Interestingly, only a modest rise in P4 levels during the estrus and metestrus time points was observed in mice. These results suggest that the predominant increase in P4 occurs around the time of the LH surge in mice.
We observed that many of the samples had levels of T and A4 that were below the LOD and found no statistically significant variations across the estrous cycle. Low levels of androgens have been reported previously in CB57BL/6 males compared to other strains (46). Additionally, rodents do not synthesize androgens from the adrenal glands, unlike humans, therefore contributing to overall lower plasma levels of androgens (47).
There are several limitations to this study. First, the investigation was undertaken in C57BL/6J mice and may not represent the gonadal steroid levels of other mouse strains. Nevertheless, the C57BL/6 strain is one of the most widely used strains in biomedical research, displaying a high degree of fecundity (48, 49), and an understanding of hormone levels in this strain is essential for future work, as well as the reinterpretation of existing studies. Whether other commonly used mouse strains such as 129/SeVe and BALB/c mice have the same gonadal steroid hormone profile will be interesting to assess. Second, although we provide the most detailed temporal resolution of gonadal steroid levels to date, it may be interesting to examine even finer time points. In particular, the time window from 10 Am through 6 Pm may be especially interesting on diestrus and proestrus. Finally, the estrous cycle is classically divided into 4 stages and vaginal lavage is commonly used to define each stage. However, this implies that each stage fits into, or consistently occurs within, a 24-hour time window, which may not always be the case. It is also somewhat variable as to when investigators consider the different stages to occur. In our case, we have defined stages beginning and ending at midnight whereas others define the start of each stage in relation to the active and passive phase determined by lighting. Further, mice will often fluctuate between having 1- or 2-day estrous/diestrus stages during their cycles. Hence, there may be considerable subtleties in gonadal steroid hormone profiles associated with these situations that would, again, require more frequent and extensive sampling to reveal.
In conclusion, we provide here a detailed assessment of gonadal steroid hormone levels across the mouse estrous cycle. Surprisingly, we note substantial differences in circulating levels of E2 and prolactin in C57BL/6 mice compared with rats. This highlights the importance of establishing a detailed hormone profile in model organisms when trying to understand the effects of gonadal steroids both on reproductive and nonreproductive physiological processes.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- A4
androstenedione
- ANOVA
analysis of variance
- E1
estrone
- E2
17β-estradiol
- ELISA
enzyme-linked immune assay
- GC
gas chromatography
- LC-MS
liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
- LH
luteinizing hormone
- LOD
limit of detection
- P4
progesterone
- PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
- T
testosterone
Contributor Information
Ellen G Wall, Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Reena Desai, ANZAC Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2139, Australia.
Zin Khant Aung, Centre for Neuroendocrinology, University of Otago School of Biomedical Sciences, Dunedin 9014, New Zealand.
Shel Hwa Yeo, Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
David R Grattan, Centre for Neuroendocrinology, University of Otago School of Biomedical Sciences, Dunedin 9014, New Zealand.
David J Handelsman, ANZAC Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2139, Australia.
Allan E Herbison, Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Funding
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (212242/Z/18/Z to A.E.H.), a Vice Chancellor's and Newnham College Scholarship, and an NHMRC Investigator Grant.
Disclosures
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Data Availability
All primary data are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
- 1. Manolagas SC, Kousteni S. Perspective: nonreproductive sites of action of reproductive hormones. Endocrinology. 2001;142(6):2200‐2204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bull JR, Rowland SP, Scherwitzl EB, Scherwitzl R, Danielsson KG, Harper J. Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1):83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Allen E. The oestrus cycle in the mouse. Am J Anat. 1922;30(3):297‐371. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Butcher RL, Collins WE, Fugo NW. Plasma concentration of LH, FSH, prolactin, progesterone and estradiol-17beta throughout the 4-day estrous cycle of the rat. Endocrinology. 1974;94(6):1704‐1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Smith MS, Freeman ME, Neill JD. The control of progesterone secretion during the estrous cycle and early pseudopregnancy in the rat: prolactin, gonadotropin and steroid levels associated with rescue of the corpus luteum of pseudopregnancy. Endocrinology. 1975;96(1):219‐226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wierman ME, Auchus RJ, Haisenleder DJ, et al. Editorial: the new instructions to authors for the reporting of steroid hormone measurements. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(12):4375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Handelsman DJ, Wartofsky L. Requirement for mass spectrometry sex steroid assays in the journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(10):3971‐3973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Auchus RJ. Steroid assays and endocrinology: best practices for basic scientists. Endocrinology. 2014;155(6):2049‐2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Taylor AE, Keevil B, Huhtaniemi IT. Mass spectrometry and immunoassay: how to measure steroid hormones today and tomorrow. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(2):D1‐D12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Caldwell ASL, Middleton LJ, Jimenez M, et al. Characterization of reproductive, metabolic, and endocrine features of polycystic ovary syndrome in female hyperandrogenic mouse models. Endocrinology. 2014;155(8):3146‐3159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. McNamara KM, Harwood DT, Simanainen U, Walters KA, Jimenez M, Handelsman DJ. Measurement of sex steroids in murine blood and reproductive tissues by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;121(3-5):611‐618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Toran-Allerand CD, Tinnikov AA, Singh RJ, Nethrapalli IS. 17α-Estradiol: a brain-active estrogen? Endocrinology. 2005;146(9):3843‐3850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Nilsson ME, Vandenput L, Tivesten Å, et al. Measurement of a comprehensive sex steroid profile in rodent serum by high-sensitive gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Endocrinology. 2015;156(7):2492‐2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ajayi AF, Akhigbe RE. Staging of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus in experimental rodents: an update. Fertil Res Pract. 2020;6(1):5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Czieselsky K, Prescott M, Porteous R, et al. Pulse and surge profiles of luteinizing hormone secretion in the mouse. Endocrinology. 2016;157(12):4794‐4802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Handelsman DJ, Gibson E, Davis S, Golebiowski B, Walters KA, Desai R. Ultrasensitive serum estradiol measurement by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in postmenopausal women and mice. J Endocr Soc. 2020;4(9):bvaa086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wood GA, Fata JE, Watson KL, Khokha R. Circulating hormones and estrous stage predict cellular and stromal remodeling in murine uterus. Reproduction. 2007;133(5):1035‐1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Annie L, Gurusubramanian G, Roy VK. Estrogen and progesterone dependent expression of visfatin/NAMPT regulates proliferation and apoptosis in mice uterus during estrous cycle. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;185:225‐236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Steyn FJ, Wan Y, Clarkson J, Veldhuis JD, Herbison AE, Chen C. Development of a methodology for and assessment of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in juvenile and adult male mice. Endocrinology. 2013;154(12):4939‐4945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Guillou A, Romanò N, Steyn F, et al. Assessment of lactotroph axis functionality in mice: longitudinal monitoring of PRL secretion by ultrasensitive-ELISA. Endocrinology. 2015;156(5):1924‐1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Phillipps HR, Khant Aung Z, Grattan DR. Elevated prolactin secretion during proestrus in mice: absence of a defined surge. J Neuroendocrinol. 2022;34(6):e13129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Handelsman DJ, Ly LP. An accurate substitution method to minimize left censoring bias in Serum steroid measurements. Endocrinology. 2019;160(10):2395‐2400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Johnson MA. Essential Reproduction. 6th ed. Blackwell Publishing;2007. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Keski-Rahkonen P, Desai R, Jimenez M, Harwood DT, Handelsman DJ. Measurement of estradiol in human serum by LC-MS/MS using a novel estrogen-specific derivatization reagent. Anal Chem. 2015;87(14):7180‐7186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Walmer DK, Wrona MA, Hughes CL, Nelson KG. Lactoferrin expression in the mouse reproductive tract during the natural estrous cycle: correlation with circulating estradiol and progesterone. Endocrinology. 1992;131(3):1458‐1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Goodman RL, Herbison AE, Lehman MN, Navarro VM. Neuroendocrine control of gonadotropin-releasing hormone: pulsatile and surge modes of secretion. J Neuroendocrinol. 2022;34(5):e13094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kauffman AS. Neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying estrogen positive feedback and the LH surge. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:953252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wintermantel TM, Campbell RE, Porteous R, et al. Definition of estrogen receptor pathway critical for estrogen positive feedback to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons and fertility. Neuron. 2006;52(2):271‐280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Glidewell-Kenney C, Hurley LA, Pfaff L, Weiss J, Levine JE, Jameson JL. Nonclassical estrogen receptor alpha signaling mediates negative feedback in the female mouse reproductive axis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(19):8173‐8177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Evans NP, Dahl GE, Padmanabhan V, Thrun LA, Karsch FJ. Estradiol requirements for induction and maintenance of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone surge: implications for neuroendocrine processing of the estradiol signal. Endocrinology. 1997;138(12):5408‐5414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Legan SJ, Coon GA, Karsch FJ. Role of estrogen as initiator of daily LH surges in the ovariectomized rat. Endocrinology. 1975;96(1):50‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bronson FH. The regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion by estrogen: relationships among negative feedback, surge potential, and male stimulation in juvenile, peripubertal, and adult female mice. Endocrinology. 1981;108(2):506‐516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bronson FH, Vom Saal FS. Control of the preovulatory release of luteinizing hormone by steroids in the mouse. Endocrinology. 1979;104(5):1247‐1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Raymond V, Beaulieu M, Labrie F, Boissier J. Potent antidopaminergic activity of estradiol at the pituitary level on prolactin release. Science. 1978;200(4346):1173‐1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kawakami M, Arita J, Yoshioka E. Loss of estrogen-induced daily surges of prolactin and gonadotropins by suprachiasmatic nucleus lesions in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology. 1980;106(4):1087‐1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Pan JT, Gala RR. Central nervous system regions involved in the estrogen-induced afternoon prolactin surge. I. Lesion studies. Endocrinology. 1985;117(1):382‐387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lightfoot JT. Sex hormones’ regulation of rodent physical activity: a review. Int J Biol Sci. 2008;4(3):126‐132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ladyman SR, Carter KM, Grattan DR. Energy homeostasis and running wheel activity during pregnancy in the mouse. Physiol Behav. 2018;194:83‐94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bailey KJ. Diurnal progesterone rhythms in the female mouse. J Endocrinol. 1987;112(1):15‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Dozortsev DI, Diamond MP. Luteinizing hormone-independent rise of progesterone as the physiological trigger of the ovulatory gonadotropins surge in the human. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):191‐199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Vanderhyden BC, Macdonald EA. Mouse oocytes regulate granulosa cell steroidogenesis throughout follicular development. Biol Reprod. 1998;59(6):1296‐1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Quirk SM, Hilbert JL, Fortune JE. Progesterone secretion by granulosa cells from rats with four- or five-day estrous cycles: the development of responses to follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone. Endocrinology. 1986;118(6):2402‐2410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ichikawa S, Morioka H, Sawada T. Acute effect of gonadotrophins on the secretion of progestins by the rat ovary. Endocrinology. 1972;90(5):1356‐1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Abedel-Majed MA, Romereim SM, Davis JS, Cupp AS. Perturbations in lineage specification of Granulosa and theca cells may alter corpus luteum formation and function. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Stouffer RL. Structure, function, and regulation of the corpus luteum. In: Plant T, Zeleznik A, eds. Knobil and Neill's Physiology of Reproduction. Vol. 1. 4th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2015:1023‐1076. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Brouillette J, Rivard K, Lizotte E, Fiset C. Sex and strain differences in adult mouse cardiac repolarization: importance of androgens. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;65(1):148‐157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. van Weerden WM, Bierings HG, van Steenbrugge GJ, de Jong FH, Schroder FH. Adrenal glands of mouse and rat do not synthesize androgens. Life Sci. 1992;50(12):857‐861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bryant CD. The blessings and curses of C57BL/6 substrains in mouse genetic studies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1245(1):31‐33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hoover-Plow J, Elliott P, Moynier B. Reproductive performance in C57BL and I strain mice. Lab Anim Sci. 1988;38(5):595‐602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All primary data are available on request from the corresponding author.



