Skip to main content
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease logoLink to Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
. 2023 Apr 29;12(9):e028027. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028027

Age‐Related Macular Degeneration With Visual Disability Is Associated With Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the Korean Nationwide Cohort

Wonyoung Jung 1,2,, Kyungdo Han 3, Bongseong Kim 3, Sungsoon Hwang 4,5, Je Moon Yoon 4, Junhee Park 1,2, Dong Hui Lim 4,5,*, Dong Wook Shin 1,5,*
PMCID: PMC10227218  PMID: 37119082

Abstract

Background

Age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of visual disability. AMD shares some risk factors with the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, previous studies examining the association between AMD and the risk of CVD provide conflicting results. Hence, we investigated the association between AMD, visual disability, and the risk of CVD.

Methods and Results

This is a nationwide cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance System database (2009–2019) on subjects who underwent a national health screening program in 2009. A total of 3 789 963 subjects were categorized by the presence of AMD and visual disability. Visual disability was defined as a best‐corrected visual acuity of ≤20/100 by validated documentation from a specialist physician. Cox regression hazard model was used to examine the hazard ratios (HRs) of CVD, including myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, after adjusting for potential confounders. During a mean 9.77 years of follow‐up, AMD was associated with a 5% higher risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01–1.10]) but not associated with increased risk of overall CVD (aHR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00–1.05]) or ischemic stroke (aHR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98–1.06]). However, when AMD was accompanied by visual disability, there was increased risk of CVD (aHR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.06–1.29]), myocardial infarction (aHR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.01–1.37]), and ischemic stroke (aHR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.06–1.35]). These trends were more evident in women and subjects with cardiometabolic comorbidities.

Conclusions

AMD with visual disability, but not all AMD, was associated with an increased risk of CVD. Patients with AMD who have visual disability should be targeted for CVD prevention.

Keywords: age‐related macular degeneration; cardiovascular disease; myocardial infarction, stroke; visual disability

Subject Categories: Cardiovascular Disease, Epidemiology


Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

AMD

age‐related macular degeneration

NHIS

National Health Insurance System

Clinical Perspective.

What Is New?

  • In this nationwide cohort study of 3 789 963 subjects with information on lifestyle behaviors, age‐related macular degeneration with visual disability, but not all age‐related macular degeneration, was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

  • Patients with age‐related macular degeneration who have visual disability should be targeted for risk factor management and disease prevention for cardiovascular disease.

Age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive and degenerative disease of the area of the retina that is responsible for central vision. 1 It is the leading cause of visual disability in developed countries, particularly in individuals aged >60 years. 2 The number of people with AMD worldwide is expected to increase to 288 million by 2040. 2 Therefore, it is of clinical significance to address comorbid conditions and health problems in people with AMD.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the leading cause of death in the United States, with 199 of 100 000 people dying of heart disease and stroke in 2019. 3 Because traditional risk factors for CVD, such as aging, cigarette smoking, obesity, elevated cholesterol levels, and hypertension, have been regarded to be risk factors for AMD, 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 AMD and CVD are now considered to share some risk factors and pathogenesis.

However, previous studies examining the association between AMD and the risk of CVD, including myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke, provide conflicting results (Tables S1 and S2). 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 Previous studies using the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database reported that AMD was associated with a 19% higher risk of incident MI 17 and a 20% higher risk of ischemic stroke. 14 Findings from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study showed that AMD was associated with a 42% higher risk of cerebral infarction in the US population. 16 On the other hand, a study in the United States showed a 42% decrease in the risk of hospitalized MI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.48–0.72]) or a 44% decrease in the risk of cerebrovascular accident (aHR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.45–0.70]). 19

Several studies have investigated the association of AMD with CVD by stage and have shown no association between late AMD and the risk of CVD, 15 , 22 but a Taiwanese study using nationwide claims data showed that patients with neovascular AMD were nearly twice as likely to be diagnosed with stroke (aHR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.34–3.02]). 20 These studies, however, were limited by suboptimal adjustment of potential confounders and a short period of follow‐up time. In addition, although visual disability is associated with cardiometabolic conditions, 26 , 27 to our knowledge, the presence of visual disability was not considered in previous studies on the risk of CVD in patients with AMD. Hence, we performed a retrospective cohort study to investigate the association between AMD, which was further categorized by visual disability, and the risk of CVD using data from the Korean National Health Insurance System (NHIS) database.

Methods

Data Availability

The data sets used and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Data Source and Study Setting

The NHIS provides mandatory universal coverage to 97% of the Korean population, and an additional medical aid program provides coverage to 3% of the population in the lowest income bracket, which is funded by general taxation. The NHIS also operates national health check‐up programs, which include a cardiovascular health screening test for every individual aged ≥40 years and all employees regardless of age. Therefore, the NHIS database comprises an eligibility database (age, sex, disability type and severity, socioeconomic variables, income level, and type of eligibility), a medical treatment database (based on medical bills claimed by medical service providers for their medical expense claims), and a health examination database. This nationwide database is widely used in epidemiologic studies in Korea. 28

Study Population

Among 4 470 729 participants (aged ≥50 years) who underwent general health screenings in 2009, we first excluded individuals with missing data on at least one variable (n=250 392). Participants who had a history or previous diagnosis of MI (n=121 690) and ischemic stroke (n=308 684) were also excluded. Finally, 3 789 963 participants were included in the analyses.

Definition of AMD

Subjects with AMD were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD‐10), code for AMD (H353) by an ophthalmologist within a year before the health screening examination. The definition of AMD involving a claim with the ICD‐10 code for AMD (H353) has also been used in a previous epidemiological study on AMD. 29

Definition of Visual Disability

We used information from the National Disability Registration System to define visual disability for our study. In Korea, the government provides welfare benefits (eg, subsidy and parking permit for people with disability), based on the type and severity of disability. 30 And most people who can meet these criteria register to this system for this benefit. Registration to this system requires a medical certificate by a specialist physician in Korea, 31 and therefore, the information is sufficiently reliable. Visual disability refers to a visual loss or visual field defect, and for registration of visual disability, medical examination and certificate by an ophthalmologist are required. Disability status is defined by the severity index, from 1 (most severe) to 6 (least severe). For instance, a best‐corrected visual acuity of ≤20/100 using the Snellen visual acuity chart is a minimal requirement to register for visual disability (Table S3).

Study Outcomes and Follow‐Up

The end points of the study were incident MI and ischemic stroke. Newly diagnosed MI and ischemic stroke were identified using the ICD‐10 code for MI (ICD‐10 code I21 or I22 during hospitalization, or these codes having been recorded at least 2 times in outpatients) and ischemic stroke (ICD‐10 code I63 or I64 during hospitalization, with claims for brain magnetic resonance imaging or brain computed tomography), respectively. 32 We also defined CVD as a composite of MI and ischemic stroke. The subjects were followed up from the date of the health screening examination in 2009 to the date of incident MI, ischemic stroke, death, censor date (eg, outmigration to another country), or until the end of the study period (December 31, 2019), whichever came first.

Covariates

The subjects provided information on lifestyle behaviors using standardized questionnaires. Smoking status was categorized as none, ex‐smoker, and current smoker. Alcohol consumption was categorized as none, mild, and heavy. Heavy drinking was defined as ≥30 g of alcohol consumption per day. Individuals were said to have regular physical activity if they exercised strenuously ≥1 time/week for at least 20 minutes per session.

Household income was dichotomized by the lowest 20th percentile, according to the health insurance premium. Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. The presence of arterial hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia was assessed using comprehensive information on medical history and clinical and pharmacy ICD‐10 codes. Arterial hypertension was defined as any of the following: systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg; or treatment with an antihypertensive medication that was linked to the arterial hypertension ICD‐10 codes (I10–I13 and I15) and resulted in at least one claim in a year. Diabetes was defined as a blood glucose level ≥126 mg/dL or a history of a hypoglycemic medication prescription that was linked to ICD‐10 codes of diabetes (E11–E14) and resulted in at least one claim in a year. Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL or a history of a lipid‐lowering medication that was associated with an ICD‐10 code (E78).

Statistical Analysis

The comparison of baseline characteristics according to the presence of AMD and visual disability was conducted using a t‐test for continuous variables or the χ2 test for categorical variables. The incidence rates of CVD were assessed as the incident cases divided by 100 000 person‐years. The Cox regression hazard model was used to examine the hazard ratios (HRs) of CVD. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for age and sex in model 2 and for age, sex, household income, area of residence, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, and regular exercise in model 3. In our final model 4, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and Charlson comorbidity index were included in addition to every adjusting variable used in model 3. Covariates were selected on the basis of previous literature, 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 and absence of multicollinearity was tested by variance inflation factor. P for trend was calculated among the HR of control, AMD without visual disability, and AMD with visual disability. Finally, to evaluate the potential effect modification by age, sex, and comorbidity status, P for interaction was calculated using stratified analysis.

The statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (2022‐03‐060). Anonymized and deidentified information was used for analyses; therefore, informed consent was not required. The database is open to all researchers whose study protocols are approved by the official review committee.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Of the total 3 789 963 individuals enrolled in the final analysis, 43 753 subjects (1.13%) had AMD at the baseline, of whom 3123 subjects (7.1% of AMD group) had visual disability. The descriptive characteristics of the study population, stratified by the presence of AMD, and further by visual disability, are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population, According to the Presence of AMD

Characteristics AMD AMD
Absence (N=3 746 210) Presence (N=43 753) P value Without visual disability (N=40 630) With visual disability (N=3123) P value
Age, y 60.1±8.1 66.7±8.5 <0.001 66.7±8.5 67.2±8.4 <0.001
Male sex, n (%) 1 815 661 (48.5) 18 543 (42.4) <0.001 17 058 (42.0) 1485 (47.6) <0.001
Smoking, n (%) <0.001 <0.001
Nonsmoker 2 485 174 (66.3) 32 016 (73.2) 29 800 (73.3) 2216 (71.0)
Ex‐smoker 587 471 (15.7) 6866 (15.7) 6366 (15.7) 500 (16.1)
Current smoker 673 565 (18.0) 4871 (11.1) 4464 (11.0) 407 (13.0)
Alcohol consumption, n (%) <0.001 <0.001
None 2 399 823 (64.1) 32 611 (74.5) 30 261 (74.5) 2350 (75.3)
Mild 1 098 959 (29.3) 9364 (21.4) 8721 (21.5) 643 (20.6)
Heavy 247 428 (6.6) 1778 (4.1) 1648 (4.1) 130 (4.2)
Regular physical activity, n (%) 798 398 (21.3) 9260 (21.2) 0.453 8587 (21.1) 673 (21.6) 0.650
Anthropometrics
Body mass index, kg/m2 24.1±3.0 24.0±3.0 <0.001 24.0±3.0 23.9±3.1 <0.001
WC, cm 82.0±8.3 82.6±8.3 <0.001 82.6±8.3 82.9±8.4 <0.001
SBP, mm Hg 126.3±15.8 128.0±15.9 <0.001 128.0±15.8 127.7±16.3 <0.001
DBP, mm Hg 77.9±10.2 77.5±10.0 <0.001 77.5±10.0 77.4±10.3 <0.001
Comorbidity, n (%)
Hypertension 1 627 704 (43.5) 24 733 (56.5) <0.001 23 016 (56.7) 1717 (55.0) <0.001
Diabetes 532 679 (14.2) 9467 (21.6) <0.001 8741 (21.5) 726 (23.3) <0.001
Dyslipidemia 998 592 (26.7) 14 204 (32.5) <0.001 13 219 (32.5) 985 (31.5) <0.001
Laboratory findings
Glucose, mg/dL 101.7±26.9 103.9±29.2 <0.001 103.8±29.1 104.8±31.4 <0.001
eGFR, mL/min per 1.73 m2 83.2±33.3 80.4±33.4 <0.001 80.4±33.1 80.5±37.1 <0.001
Cholesterol, mg/dL 201.8±38.0 200.2±38.9 <0.001 200.3±38.8 199.1±39.5 <0.001
HDL‐C, mg/dL 55.7±31.0 55.5±34.5 0.054 55.6±34.4 54.5±34.7 0.058
LDL‐C, mg/dL 119.7±39.2 119.2±39.6 0.006 119.3±39.6 118.3±39.1 0.017
Triglycerides, mg/dL* 120.8 (120.7–120.9) 120.5 (119.9–121.1) 0.775 120.3 (119.7–120.9) 123.5 (121.3–125.8) 0.017
Urban residency, n (%) 1 714 128 (45.8) 18 290 (41.8) <0.001 16 989 (41.8) 1301 (41.7) <0.001
Income, n (%)
Lowest 20% 815 269 (21.8) 8032 (18.4) <0.001 7410 (18.2) 621 (19.9) <0.001
Charlson comorbidity index 1.4±1.3 2.1±1.5 <0.001 2.1±1.5 2.1±1.5 <0.001

Data are expressed as mean±SD or number (percentage), except for triglycerides, which are presented as geometric mean with a 95% CI using the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test. AMD indicates age‐related macular degeneration; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; and WC, waist circumference.

*

Geometric mean (95% CI).

Among subjects with AMD (AMD group), the average age at baseline was 66.7±8.5 years, 42.4% were men, and 11.1% were current smokers. At baseline, the AMD group was older, with a higher proportion of women and nonsmokers, and a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia than the non‐AMD group, or subjects without AMD (all P<0.001). For subjects who had AMD with visual disability at baseline (AMD with visual disability group), the average age at baseline was 67.2±8.4 years, with 47.6% men, and 13.0% current smokers. At baseline, the AMD with visual disability group was older, with a higher proportion of men and current smokers, and had a lower prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia than the AMD without visual disability group (all P<0.001). Detailed information is shown in Table 1.

AMD and the Risk of CVD, According to Visual Disability Status

During a mean 9.77 years of follow‐up, there were 254 670 overall CVD events (6.72%): 112 174 cases of MI and 156 675 cases of ischemic stroke. The association between AMD and the risk of CVD (MI and ischemic stroke) is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Association Between AMD and the Risk of Cardiovascular Outcome, According to Visual Disability

Variable Subjects, N Cases, n IR per 1000 person‐years Model 1 (crude) Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
HR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI)
Cardiovascular disease, composite of myocardial infraction and ischemic stroke
Non‐AMD 3 746 210 249 914 6.8 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
AMD 43 753 4756 11.6 1.72 (1.67–1.77)* 1.09 (1.06–1.12)* 1.11 (1.07–1.14)* 1.02 (1.00–1.05)
P value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.101
AMD without visual disability 40 630 4365 11.5 1.69 (1.64–1.74)* 1.08 (1.05–1.11)* 1.09 (1.06–1.13)* 1.01 (0.98–1.04)
AMD with visual disability 3123 391 13.9 2.06 (1.86–2.27)* 1.24 (1.13–1.37)* 1.25 (1.14–1.39)* 1.17 (1.06–1.29)*
P for trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.025
Myocardial infarction
Non‐AMD 3 746 210 110 119 3.0 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
AMD 43 753 2055 4.9 1.67 (1.60–1.74)* 1.14 (1.09–1.19)* 1.15 (1.10–1.20)* 1.05 (1.01–1.10)*
P value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.020
AMD without visual disability 40 630 1888 4.8 1.65 (1.57–1.72)* 1.13 (1.08–1.18)* 1.14 (1.09–1.19)* 1.04 (1.00–1.09)*
AMD with visual disability 3123 167 5.8 1.97 (1.69–2.29)* 1.28 (1.10–1.49)* 1.29 (1.11–1.50)* 1.18 (1.01–1.37)*
P for trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.009
Ischemic stroke
Non‐AMD 3 746 210 153 614 4.2 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
AMD 43 753 3061 7.4 1.78 (1.72–1.85)* 1.07 (1.04–1.11)* 1.09 (1.05–1.13)* 1.02 (0.98–1.06)
P value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.332
AMD without visual disability 40 630 2800 7.3 1.75 (1.69–1.82)* 1.06 (1.02–1.10)* 1.08 (1.04–1.12)* 1.00 (0.97–1.04)
AMD with visual disability 3123 261 9.1 2.21 (1.96–2.50)* 1.26 (1.12–1.42)* 1.28 (1.13–1.45)* 1.20 (1.06–1.35)*
P for trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.112

Model 2, adjusted for age and sex; model 3, model 2+adjusted for income, area of residence, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, and regular physical activity; and model 4, model 3+adjusted for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and Charlson comorbidity index. aHR indicates adjusted HR; AMD, age‐related macular degeneration; HR, hazard ratio; and IR, incidence rate.

*

Statistically significant results.

P for trend was calculated by the (adjusted) HRs among control, AMD without visual disability, and AMD with visual disability groups.

AMD was not associated with the risk of overall CVD (aHR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00–1.05]; P =0.101). Further analysis that specified AMD by visual disability status demonstrated no increased risk in AMD without visual disability (aHR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.98–1.04]) and a 17% increased risk for CVD in AMD with visual disability (aHR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.06–1.29]). In addition, there was a significant trend in the risk of CVD among the non‐AMD, AMD without visual disability, and AMD with visual disability groups ( P for trend=0.025).

AMD was associated with a 5% increased risk of MI (aHR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01–1.10]). Further analysis that evaluated AMD by visual disability demonstrated that there were 4% and 18% increased risks for MI in AMD without and with visual disability, respectively (aHR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00–1.09]; and aHR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.01–1.37], respectively). In addition, a significant trend in the risk of MI was found among the control, AMD without visual disability, and AMD with visual disability groups (P for trend=0.009).

AMD was not associated with the risk of ischemic stroke (aHR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98–1.06]). However, the association was significant between AMD with visual disability and the incidence of ischemic stroke (aHR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.06–1.35]). Contrary to the findings in MI, no significant trend of ischemic stroke risk was found among the control, AMD without visual disability, and AMD with visual disability groups ( P for trend=0.112).

Stratified Analysis

We performed stratified analysis according to age, sex, and cardiometabolic comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia) (Table 3). There was no significant interaction according to age groups. The relationship between AMD and CVD was more evident in women, with a significant interaction between AMD and sex (P‐interaction=0.006). Trends in the risk of CVD were higher with AMD and visual disability in subjects who had cardiometabolic comorbidities than in those who did not: aHR (95% CI) values for CVD, MI, and ischemic stroke were 1.20 (1.07–1.34) versus 1.26 (1.07–1.48); 1.21 (1.05–1.38) versus 1.04 (0.83–1.31); and 0.88 (0.60–1.28) versus 1.16 (0.88–1.54), respectively, and P‐interaction was significant for MI (P‐interaction=0.014).

Table 3.

Risk of Cardiovascular Outcome by AMD and Visual Disability, According to Age, Sex, and Comorbidities

Variable Subjects, N Cardiovascular disease Myocardial infarction Ischemic stroke
Cases, n aHR (95% CI)* Cases, n aHR (95% CI)* Cases, n aHR (95% CI)*
Age group, y
50–64 Non‐AMD 2 699 819 118 815 1 (Reference) 57 207 1 (Reference) 66 324 1 (Reference)
AMD without visual disability 15 931 867 1.01 (0.95–1.08) 422 1.03 (0.93–1.13) 499 1.03 (0.94–1.12)
AMD with visual disability 1146 77 1.22 (0.98–1.53) 42 1.40 (1.03–1.89) 44 1.24 (0.92–1.66)
65–74 Non‐AMD 844 539 95 275 1 (Reference) 38 668 1 (Reference) 62 845 1 (Reference)
AMD without visual disability 17 705 2150 1.00 (0.96–1.04) 941 1.07 (1.00–1.14) 1379 0.97 (0.92–1.02)
AMD with visual disability 1383 209 1.26 (1.10–1.45) 77 1.10 (0.88–1.38) 147 1.35 (1.15–1.58)
≥75 Non‐AMD 201 852 35 824 1 (Reference) 14 244 1 (Reference) 24 445 1 (Reference)
AMD without visual disability 6994 1348 1.02 (0.97–1.08) 525 0.98 (0.90–1.07) 922 1.03 (0.97–1.10)
AMD with visual disability 594 105 0.96 (0.79–1.17) 48 1.10 (0.83–1.46) 70 0.94 (0.75–1.19)
P interaction 0.215 0.363 0.072
Sex
Men Non‐AMD 1 815 661 138 864 1 (Reference) 61 421 1 (Reference) 85 132 1 (Reference)
AMD without visual disability 17 058 1950 0.96 (0.92–1.00) 876 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 1222 0.93 (0.88–0.99)
AMD with visual disability 1485 200 1.11 (0.97–1.27) 84 1.10 (0.88–1.36) 137 1.17 (0.99–1.38)
Women Non‐AMD 1 930 549 111 050 1 (Reference) 48 698 1 (Reference) 68 482 1 (Reference)
AMD without visual disability 23 572 2415 1.05 (1.02–1.10) 1012 1.05 (0.99–1.12) 1578 1.06 (1.01–1.12)
AMD with visual disability 1638 191 1.23 (1.06–1.41) 83 1.26 (1.02–1.57) 124 1.23 (1.03–1.46)
P interaction 0.006 0.523 0.003
Cardiometabolic comorbidities
No Non‐AMD 1 556 949 69 242 1 (Reference) 31 860 1 (Reference) 40 285 1 (Reference)
AMD without visual disability 11 862 791 0.96 (0.90–1.03) 329 0.92 (0.83–1.03) 498 0.99 (0.90–1.08)
AMD with visual disability 959 73 1.04 (0.83–1.31) 27 0.88 (0.60–1.28) 50 1.16 (0.88–1.54)
Yes Non‐AMD 2 189 261 180 672 1 (Reference) 78 259 1 (Reference) 113 329 1 (Reference)
AMD without visual disability 28 768 3574 1.02 (0.99–1.06) 1559 1.07 (1.01–1.12) 2302 1.00 (0.96–1.05)
AMD with visual disability 2164 318 1.20 (1.07–1.34) 140 1.26 (1.07–1.48) 211 1.21 (1.05–1.38)
P interaction 0.201 0.014 0.927

aHR indicates adjusted hazard ratio; and AMD, age‐related macular degeneration.

*

Adjusted for age, sex, income, area of residence, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular physical activity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and Charlson comorbidity index, but excluding the variable used in stratification.

Statistically significant results.

Discussion

In this population‐based longitudinal study of the Korean population, we found that patients with AMD overall had no increased risk of CVD than non‐AMD groups. However, the risk was higher when they have visual disability (17%).

Our findings showed that AMD was associated with a 5% increased risk of MI. Previous investigations have mostly suggested no significant association between AMD and MI. Prospective studies from US populations (MESA [Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis] 25 and ARIC study 24 ) and retrospective studies using Israeli claims data 18 demonstrated no significant association. On the other hand, one US study using the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database showed a 19% higher risk of MI (aHR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.16–1.22]), 17 whereas the findings from the study using the US Ingenix LabRx database concluded that the rates of MI were even lower in patients with neovascular AMD than in the control (aHR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.48–0.72]). 19

We found that the risk of ischemic stroke was not significantly associated with AMD. Previous studies have demonstrated conflicting results: no association (the Rotterdam study 15 ) or a higher risk of ischemic stroke (40% in ARIC study 16 and 20% in the US Medicare study 14 ). Three meta‐analyses 11 , 12 , 33 also found a nonsignificant association between AMD and stroke: Wu et al, 1.13 (95% CI, 0.93–1.36) 33 ; Fernandez et al, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.81–1.44) 12 ; and Wang et al, 1.13 (95% CI, 0.93–1.44). 11

Several hypotheses have been proposed for the mechanisms of the association between AMD and the risk of CVD. Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress are plausible biologic mechanisms for both AMD and CVD. 34 , 35 , 36 Current knowledge of the pathophysiology underlying AMD has highlighted the major role of oxidative stress in triggering outer blood–retinal barrier degeneration. 37 , 38 Therefore, current therapeutic options for neovascular AMD are targeting vascular endothelial growth factor in the retina. The vascular model proposes that AMD is a vascular disease characterized by the impairment of choroidal perfusion. 39 , 40 Hemodynamic changes in the choroidal vasculature are closely associated with oxidative stress, atherosclerotic process, and blood pressure, 39 , 40 suggesting a link between AMD and CVD. However, contrary to this hypothesis, our results suggest that AMD itself is not strongly associated with CVD risk and has only a weak association with MI if any, but no significant association with ischemic stroke.

Notably, in further analysis that subdivides AMD by visual disability, we found a significantly increased risk of CVD in patients with AMD who have visual disability. The reasons for this are not clear, but potential explanations include the following.

First, the differential association between AMD without visual disability and with visual disability may partially reflect the difference in severity and pathophysiology of AMD types. Visual disability in patients with AMD occurs when early AMD progresses to late AMD. In neovascular AMD, a late AMD type, the formation of choroidal neovascularization caused by vascular endothelial growth factor secreted as a result of choroidal ischemia, is a key to pathogenesis. 41 Choroidal vascular change, which can induce choroidal ischemia, is associated with systemic vascular abnormalities. 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 Therefore, neovascular AMD may have systemic vascular abnormalities at the baseline, which could lead to CVD during the follow‐up period. However, this hypothesis has a limitation in that it cannot explain the association between CVD and individuals with geographic atrophy, another type of late AMD. Findings from the CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study) showed that late AMD was not associated with incident coronary heart disease (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.25–2.48]) in a US population, 22 and one Dutch study (Rotterdam study) reported that late stages of AMD were not associated with cerebral infarction (aHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.43–1.82]). 15 In addition, a meta‐analysis showed that late AMD is not associated with total CVD (relative risk [RR], 1.17 [95% CI, 0.98–1.40]), coronary heart disease (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.64–1.96]), or stroke (RR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.74–1.78]). A positive association between late AMD and stroke in a Taiwanese population, but not in a Dutch population, might suggest a potential ethnic difference between late AMD and stroke. Further studies are needed to investigate whether different severity of AMD is differentially associated with CVD risk.

Second, patients with AMD who have visual disability have a more traditional risk factor of CVD than patients without visual disability. Visual impairment is associated with physical inactivity 46 , 47 , 48 and is a risk factor for falls and hip fractures, 49 , 50 which may have additional adverse results for people with visual disability. For instance, individuals with visual disability may experience great difficulty in accessing health care services. For individuals with severe central vision loss, which is typical in advanced AMD, their inability to read a text may cause poor compliance (eg, by misunderstanding the prescription). Visual impairment can also have adverse functional consequences, including social isolation, restriction of daily activities, poor quality of life, and frailty, 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 especially in the elderly population. In addition, visual impairment significantly affects nutritional status, with a higher prevalence of obesity and malnutrition. 59 For the multiple components that interplay between visual impairment and adverse health outcomes, our finding that individuals with AMD and visual disability have a much higher risk of CVD than the non‐AMD group or even AMD without visual disability may be explained. A further prospective study that specifies a chronological order in AMD and visual disability may enhance our understanding.

Notably, to our best knowledge, this is the first cohort study that demonstrated that AMD is differently associated with the risk of CVD (especially for ischemic stroke) by sex. Multiple mechanisms may contribute to the sex difference in our finding. First, estrogen may play a role in the risk of stroke 60 , 61 , 62 and exudative AMD. 63 Second, female predominance (86.2%) of subretinal drusenoid deposit in the Korean population, 64 which is associated with the risk of stroke, 65 may be another explanation. Last, the interaction of sex with the complement system, a key factor in the pathogenesis of AMD 66 , 67 and ischemic injuries, 68 , 69 may explain our findings. However, identifying the exact mechanism underlying these differential associations is beyond the scope of our study.

It is intriguing that associations between AMD, visual disability, and CVD were more prominent in patients with AMD with underlying cardiometabolic comorbidity than in patients with AMD without cardiometabolic comorbidity. A recent study reported that in individuals with visual impairment, the risk of cardiometabolic diseases was 70% higher than in age‐ and sex‐matched controls (HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4–2.0]). 27 However, previous studies have already shown that individuals with a disability were less likely to use appropriate health care services, 70 , 71 and those with visual disability have lower medication adherence than those without visual disability. 72 Management of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, which were altogether defined as cardiometabolic comorbidity in our study, involves an integrated care approach to lifestyle modifications, education, and medical treatment. Hence, clinical care should focus on screening and management of chronic diseases in patients with AMD for the prevention of CVD.

Our findings showed that AMD without visual disability was not associated with an increased risk of CVD, whereas AMD with visual disability was associated with a 17% increased risk of CVD. Therefore, individuals with both AMD and visual disability should be monitored for CVD risk. The underlying pathophysiology between advanced AMD and CVD needs to be elucidated in future studies.

Several limitations should be considered in interpreting our results. First, this is an observational study that can only suggest associations and cannot establish a causal relationship. Second, as we relied on the diagnostic code for AMD diagnoses, AMD might be underdiagnosed, especially when subjects do not have visual disability. In addition, most patients with AMD in Korea have early AMD without symptoms that cannot be identified in a claims database. Therefore, the association between AMD and CVD could be more attenuated in our findings than in the actual population. Third, only 3‐digit ICD‐10 codes (eg, H353) were available for the study population from the Korean NHIS database in 2009. Therefore, individuals diagnosed with H35.33 (macular hole) were likely included among the study participants but are only estimated to represent ≈5% of our study population (data not shown); thus, the impact of their inclusion is unlikely to be substantial. Fourth, our data from the NHIS database do not have the cause of death information, and therefore, we were unable to consider cardiovascular mortality in this study. Fifth, our results cannot be generalized to other ethnic groups considering the ethnic difference in genetic factors related to AMD. 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 Last, other possible confounders, including nutrition and dietary factors, 50 , 77 were not controlled.

In summary, AMD with visual disability, but not all AMD, was associated with an increased risk of CVD. Patients with AMD who have visual disability should be targeted for risk factor management and disease prevention for CVD.

Sources of Funding

This research was partially supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant HI20C1073), which was received by Dr Shin; and by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea (NRF‐2021R1C1C1007795), which was received by Dr Lim.

Disclosures

None.

Supporting information

Tables S1–S3

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 8.

Contributor Information

Dong Hui Lim, Email: ldhlse@gmail.com.

Dong Wook Shin, Email: dwshin.md@gmail.com.

References

  • 1. Keenan TDL, Cukras CA, Chew EY. Age‐related macular degeneration: epidemiology and clinical aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1256:1–31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-66014-7_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CM, Klein R, Cheng CY, Wong TY. Global prevalence of age‐related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e106–e116. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70145-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, Carson AP, Commodore‐Mensah Y, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics‐2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145:e153–e639. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Snow KK, Seddon JM. Do age‐related macular degeneration and cardiovascular disease share common antecedents? Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1999;6:125–143. doi: 10.1076/opep.6.2.125.1558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tan JS, Mitchell P, Smith W, Wang JJ. Cardiovascular risk factors and the long‐term incidence of age‐related macular degeneration: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1143–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Delcourt C, Michel F, Colvez A, Lacroux A, Delage M, Vernet MH. Associations of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors with age‐related macular degeneration: the POLA study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2001;8:237–249. doi: 10.1076/opep.8.4.237.1613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cackett P, Wong TY, Aung T, Saw SM, Tay WT, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Smoking, cardiovascular risk factors, and age‐related macular degeneration in Asians: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:960–967.e961. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lüdtke L, Jürgens C, Ittermann T, Völzke H, Tost F. Age‐related macular degeneration and associated risk factors in the population‐based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP‐Trend). Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:6383–6390. doi: 10.12659/msm.915493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cheung CMG, Gan A, Fan Q, Chee ML, Apte RS, Khor CC, Yeo I, Mathur R, Cheng CY, Wong TY, et al. Plasma lipoprotein subfraction concentrations are associated with lipid metabolism and age‐related macular degeneration. J Lipid Res. 2017;58:1785–1796. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M073684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Erke MG, Bertelsen G, Peto T, Sjølie AK, Lindekleiv H, Njølstad I. Cardiovascular risk factors associated with age‐related macular degeneration: the Tromsø Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:662–669. doi: 10.1111/aos.12346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wang J, Xue Y, Thapa S, Wang L, Tang J, Ji K. Relation between age‐related macular degeneration and cardiovascular events and mortality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8212063–8212010. doi: 10.1155/2016/8212063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fernandez AB, Panza GA, Cramer B, Chatterjee S, Jayaraman R, Wu WC. Age‐related macular degeneration and incident stroke: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lee J, Suh HS, Hwang IC. The relationship between age‐related macular degeneration and cardiovascular disease: a meta‐analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50:219–231. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i2.5334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Liao D, Mo J, Duan Y, Klein R, Scott IU, Huang KA, Zhou H. Is age‐related macular degeneration associated with stroke among elderly Americans? Open Ophthalmol J. 2008;2:37–42. doi: 10.2174/1874364100802010037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wieberdink RG, Ho L, Ikram MK, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, de Jong PT, Vingerling JR, Breteler MM. Age‐related macular degeneration and the risk of stroke: the Rotterdam study. Stroke. 2011;42:2138–2142. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.111.616359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ikram MK, Mitchell P, Klein R, Sharrett AR, Couper DJ, Wong TY. Age‐related macular degeneration and long‐term risk of stroke subtypes. Stroke. 2012;43:1681–1683. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.654632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Duan Y, Mo J, Klein R, Scott IU, Lin HM, Caulfield J, Patel M, Liao D. Age‐related macular degeneration is associated with incident myocardial infarction among elderly Americans. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:732–737. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Golan S, Shalev V, Goldstein M, Treister G, Chodick G, Loewenstein A. The rate of myocardial infarction events among patients with age‐related macular degeneration: a population‐based study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:179–182. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1489-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Nguyen‐Khoa BA, Goehring EL Jr, Werther W, Gower EW, Do DV, Jones JK. Hospitalized cardiovascular diseases in neovascular age‐related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1280–1286. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.9.1280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hu CC, Ho JD, Lin HC. Neovascular age‐related macular degeneration and the risk of stroke: a 5‐year population‐based follow‐up study. Stroke. 2010;41:613–617. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.109.571000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chakravarthy U, Wong TY, Fletcher A, Piault E, Evans C, Zlateva G, Buggage R, Pleil A, Mitchell P. Clinical risk factors for age‐related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2010;10:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-10-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sun C, Klein R, Wong TY. Age‐related macular degeneration and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the cardiovascular health study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1913–1919. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wong TY, Klein R, Sun C, Mitchell P, Couper DJ, Lai H, Hubbard LD, Sharrett AR. Age‐related macular degeneration and risk for stroke. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:98–106. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-2-200607180-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wong TY, Tikellis G, Sun C, Klein R, Couper DJ, Sharrett AR. Age‐related macular degeneration and risk of coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Fernandez AB, Wong TY, Klein R, Collins D, Burke G, Cotch MF, Klein B, Sadeghi MM, Chen J. Age‐related macular degeneration and incident cardiovascular disease: the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:765–770. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Crews JE, Chou CF, Sekar S, Saaddine JB. The prevalence of chronic conditions and poor health among people with and without vision impairment, aged ≥65 years, 2010‐2014. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;182:18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kolli A, Seiler K, Kamdar N, De Lott LB, Peterson MD, Meade MA, Ehrlich JR. Longitudinal associations between vision impairment and the incidence of neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, and cardiometabolic chronic diseases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;235:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lee YH, Han K, Ko SH, Ko KS, Lee KU. Data analytic process of a nationwide population‐based study using national health information database established by National Health Insurance Service. Diabetes Metab J. 2016;40:79–82. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2016.40.1.79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kim S, Park SJ, Byun SJ, Park KH, Suh HS. Incremental economic burden associated with exudative age‐related macular degeneration: a population‐based study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:828. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4666-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea . Overview of Disabled Pension. Updated March 8, 2023. https://www.mohw.go.kr/react/policy/index.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=06&MENU_ID=06370301&PAGE=1&topTitle=. Accessed April 5, 2022.
  • 31. Shin DW, Lee JW, Jung JH, Han K, Kim SY, Choi KS, Park JH, Park JH. Disparities in cervical cancer screening among women with disabilities: a National Database Study in South Korea. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2778–2786. doi: 10.1200/jco.2018.77.7912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jeong SM, Jeon KH, Shin DW, Han K, Kim D, Park SH, Cho MH, Lee CM, Nam KW, Lee SP. Smoking cessation, but not reduction, reduces cardiovascular disease incidence. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:4141–4153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wu J, Uchino M, Sastry SM, Schaumberg DA. Age‐related macular degeneration and the incidence of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nowak JZ. Age‐related macular degeneration (AMD): pathogenesis and therapy. Pharmacol Rep. 2006;58:353–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bok D. Evidence for an inflammatory process in age‐related macular degeneration gains new support. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7053–7054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502819102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Beatty S, Koh H, Phil M, Henson D, Boulton M. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age‐related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:115–134. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00140-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Abokyi S, Tao CH, Lam TT, Tse DY. Central role of oxidative stress in age‐related macular degeneration: evidence from a review of the molecular mechanisms and animal models. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:7901270–7901219. doi: 10.1155/2020/7901270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tisi A, Feligioni M, Passacantando M, Ciancaglini M, Maccarone R. The impact of oxidative stress on blood‐retinal barrier physiology in age‐related macular degeneration. Cells. 2021;10:64. doi: 10.3390/cells10010064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Friedman E. A hemodynamic model of the pathogenesis of age‐related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:677–682. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70906-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Friedman E. The pathogenesis of age‐related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:348–349. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ding X, Patel M, Chan CC. Molecular pathology of age‐related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009;28:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ahmad M, Kaszubski PA, Cobbs L, Reynolds H, Smith RT. Choroidal thickness in patients with coronary artery disease. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Dogan Z, Yesildag O, Ileri C, Sadic BO, Sunbul M. 1946. Evaluation of arterial stiffness and subfoveal choroid thickness in patients with slow coronary flow. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:38. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx502.1946 27071821 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kanar B, Kanar HS. Relationship between angiographic coronary slow flow phenomenon and subfoveal choroidal thickness: what is the effect of atorvastatin therapy. Eur Exp Biol. 2018;8:9. doi: 10.21767/2248-9215.100050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wang J, Jiang J, Zhang Y, Qian YW, Zhang JF, Wang ZL. Retinal and choroidal vascular changes in coronary heart disease: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Biomed Opt Express. 2019;10:1532–1544. doi: 10.1364/boe.10.001532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Nguyen AM, Arora KS, Swenor BK, Friedman DS, Ramulu PY. Physical activity restriction in age‐related eye disease: a cross‐sectional study exploring fear of falling as a potential mediator. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:64. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0062-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Willis JR, Jefferys JL, Vitale S, Ramulu PY. Visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and accelerometer‐defined physical activity in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:329–335. doi: 10.1001/archopthalmol.2011.1773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. van Landingham SW, Willis JR, Vitale S, Ramulu PY. Visual field loss and accelerometer‐measured physical activity in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2486–2492. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hamedani AG, VanderBeek BL, Willis AW. Blindness and visual impairment in the Medicare population: disparities and association with hip fracture and neuropsychiatric outcomes. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019;26:279–285. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2019.1611879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Swenor BK, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Newman AB, Rubin S, Wilson V. Visual impairment and incident mobility limitations: the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:46–54. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Crews JE, Chou CF, Zhang X, Zack MM, Saaddine JB. Health‐related quality of life among people aged ≥65 years with self‐reported visual impairment: findings from the 2006‐2010 behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014;21:287–296. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2014.926556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Langelaan M, de Boer MR, van Nispen RM, Wouters B, Moll AC, van Rens GH. Impact of visual impairment on quality of life: a comparison with quality of life in the general population and with other chronic conditions. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14:119–126. doi: 10.1080/09286580601139212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Vu HT, Keeffe JE, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Impact of unilateral and bilateral vision loss on quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:360–363. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.047498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Crews JE, Campbell VA. Vision impairment and hearing loss among community‐dwelling older Americans: implications for health and functioning. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:823–829. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.5.823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RC, Panda‐Jonas S, Jonas JB, Bakker D, Pols HA, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1788–1794. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.12.1788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Wallhagen MI, Strawbridge WJ, Shema SJ, Kurata J, Kaplan GA. Comparative impact of hearing and vision impairment on subsequent functioning. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1086–1092. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49213.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Bookwala J, Lawson B. Poor vision, functioning, and depressive symptoms: a test of the activity restriction model. Gerontologist. 2011;51:798–808. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE. Relationship of measures of frailty to visual function: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2003;101:191–196. discussion 196–199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Jones N, Bartlett H. The impact of visual impairment on nutritional status: a systematic review. Br J Vis Impair. 2018;36:17–30. doi: 10.1177/0264619617730860 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Petrea RE, Beiser AS, Seshadri S, Kelly‐Hayes M, Kase CS, Wolf PA. Gender differences in stroke incidence and poststroke disability in the Framingham Heart Study. Stroke. 2009;40:1032–1037. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.108.542894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Wassertheil‐Smoller S, Hendrix SL, Limacher M, Heiss G, Kooperberg C, Baird A, Kotchen T, Curb JD, Black H, Rossouw JE, et al. Effect of estrogen plus progestin on stroke in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2673–2684. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.20.2673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Hendrix SL, Wassertheil‐Smoller S, Johnson KC, Howard BV, Kooperberg C, Rossouw JE, Trevisan M, Aragaki A, Baird AE, Bray PF, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen on stroke in the Women's Health Initiative. Circulation. 2006;113:2425–2434. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.105.594077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Hwang S, Kang SW, Han J, Han K, Kim D, Lee KN, Jeon KH, Yoo JE, Lee D‐Y, Shin DW, et al. Female Reproductive factors and the risk of exudative age‐related macular degeneration: a nationwide cohort study. Retina. 2021;41:2088–2097. doi: 10.1097/iae.0000000000003164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Lee MY, Yoon J, Ham DI. Clinical characteristics of reticular pseudodrusen in Korean patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Thomson RJ, Chazaro J, Otero‐Marquez O, Ledesma‐Gil G, Tong Y, Coughlin AC, Teibel ZR, Alauddin S, Tai K, Lloyd H, et al. Subretinal drusenoid deposits and soft drusen: are they markers for distinct retinal diseases? Retina. 2022;42:1311–1318. doi: 10.1097/iae.0000000000003460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Weber BH, Charbel Issa P, Pauly D, Herrmann P, Grassmann F, Holz FG. The role of the complement system in age‐related macular degeneration. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:133–138. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Warwick A, Khandhadia S, Ennis S, Lotery A. Age‐related macular degeneration: a disease of systemic or local complement dysregulation? J Clin Med. 2014;3:1234–1257. doi: 10.3390/jcm3041234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Arumugam TV, Shiels IA, Woodruff TM, Granger DN, Taylor SM. The role of the complement system in ischemia‐reperfusion injury. Shock. 2004;21:401–409. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200405000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Gorsuch WB, Chrysanthou E, Schwaeble WJ, Stahl GL. The complement system in ischemia‐reperfusion injuries. Immunobiology. 2012;217:1026–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.07.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Dejong G, Palsbo SE, Beatty PW, Jones GC, Knoll T, Neri MT. The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities. Milbank Q. 2002;80:261–301. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Beatty PW, Hagglund KJ, Neri MT, Dhont KR, Clark MJ, Hilton SA. Access to health care services among people with chronic or disabling conditions: patterns and predictors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1417–1425. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00268-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Park JH, Park JH, Lee SY, Kim SY, Shin Y, Kim SY. Disparities in antihypertensive medication adherence in persons with disabilities and without disabilities: results of a Korean population‐based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1460–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. DeAngelis MM, Owen LA, Morrison MA, Morgan DJ, Li M, Shakoor A, Vitale A, Iyengar S, Stambolian D, Kim IK, et al. Genetics of age‐related macular degeneration (AMD). Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:R45–r50. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Spencer KL, Glenn K, Brown‐Gentry K, Haines JL, Crawford DC. Population differences in genetic risk for age‐related macular degeneration and implications for genetic testing. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:116–117. doi: 10.1001/archopthalmol.2011.1370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Restrepo NA, Spencer KL, Goodloe R, Garrett TA, Heiss G, Bůžková P, Jorgensen N, Jensen RA, Matise TC, Hindorff LA, et al. Genetic determinants of age‐related macular degeneration in diverse populations from the PAGE Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:6839–6850. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Kondo N, Bessho H, Honda S, Negi A. Complement factor H Y402H variant and risk of age‐related macular degeneration in Asians: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:339–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Gorusupudi A, Nelson K, Bernstein PS. The Age‐Related Eye Disease 2 Study: micronutrients in the treatment of macular degeneration. Adv Nutr. 2017;8:40–53. doi: 10.3945/an.116.013177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Tables S1–S3

Data Availability Statement

The data sets used and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES