Abstract
Background
To promote ideal cardiovascular health, the American Heart Association recommends adhering to Life's Simple 7 (LS7)—achieving healthy targets for body mass index, physical activity, dietary intake, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, and cholesterol, along with smoking abstinence. Poorer achievement of LS7 (lower score) has been associated with the development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. However, less is known about the associations between LS7 and specific biomarkers linked to cardiovascular health: aldosterone, CRP (C‐reactive protein), and IL‐6 (interleukin‐6).
Methods and Results
We analyzed 379 individuals (age 18–66 years) from the HyperPATH (International Hypertensive Pathotype), who were maintained on ≥200 mEq of sodium daily for 1 week. We calculated a 14‐point summative LS7 score according to participants' baseline data. Based on the range of LS7 score in this population (3–14), we classified participants as “inadequate” (3–6), “average” (7–10), and “optimal” (11–14). Regression analyses found that a higher LS7 score group was associated with lower levels of serum and urinary aldosterone (P trend<0.001 and P trend=0.001, respectively), lower plasma renin activity (P trend<0.001), and a blunted increase in serum aldosterone with angiotensin II infusion (P trend=0.023). Being in the “optimal” LS7 score group was associated with lower serum CRP (P trend=0.001) and IL‐6 (P trend=0.001).
Conclusions
A higher LS7 score was associated with a lower activity of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system and lower levels of the inflammatory markers CRP and IL‐6. These findings offer a possible link between ideal cardiovascular health targets and biomarkers known to play a central role in the development of cardiovascular disease.
Keywords: aldosterone, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, Life's Simple 7
Subject Categories: Cardiovascular Disease, Lifestyle, Hypertension, High Blood Pressure
Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms
- Ang II
angiotensin II
- HyperPATH
International Hypertensive Pathotype
- IL‐6
Interleukin‐6
- LS7
Life's Simple 7
- RAAS
renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone‐system
- SASSI
sodium‐modulated‐aldosterone suppression to stimulation index
Clinical Perspective.
What Is New?
In normotensive and hypertensive individuals on controlled sodium diets, better adherence to American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 recommendations is associated with lower levels of interleukin‐6, C‐reactive protein, and aldosterone—all mediators of cardiovascular injury.
Better achievement of Life's Simple 7 is associated with lower activity of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system at multiple points—lower plasma renin activity, blunted aldosterone response to infused angiotensin II, and lower serum and urinary aldosterone levels.
What Are the Clinical Implications?
Better adherence to the Life's Simple 7 recommendations has a beneficial impact on specific and measurable biomarkers/mediators of inflammation and cardiovascular injury.
The development and progression of cardiovascular disease are impacted by both behavioral and biological changes. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Life's Simple 7 (LS7) are recommendations put forth by the American Heart Association in 2010 for the achievement of better cardiovascular health. 5 The 7 recommendations include smoking abstinence, a healthy body mass index (BMI), a balanced diet, regular physical activity as well as maintaining control of blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol. Since the inception of this framework for considering cardiovascular health, there have been observational studies demonstrating that achievement in a greater number of these recommendations—that is, a higher LS7 score—is associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular disease, 6 incident hypertension, 7 , 8 and resistant hypertension. 9
A previous study by Kesireddy et al examined the association between LS7 and serum aldosterone levels. 10 Aldosterone activates the MR (mineralocorticoid receptor). There is an extensive body of literature linking excess MR activation to cardiovascular disease, 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 and multiple clinical trials have shown that MR blockade is efficacious at improving morbidity and mortality in cardiac and renal disease. 15 , 16 , 17
Using the Jackson Heart Study database, Kesireddy et al found that higher LS7 score was associated with lower serum aldosterone in a Black population. 10 However, the study did not control for dietary sodium intake, which is a key regulator of aldosterone. To better understand the relationship between LS7 and aldosterone, it is important to study the association under controlled dietary sodium. We used the HyperPATH (International Hypertensive Pathotype) consortium database—which consists of a predominantly White population with and without mild hypertension. HyperPATH was designed to study the activity of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone‐system (RAAS). Because dietary sodium intake is a profound regulator of RAAS, individuals were studied on a liberal sodium diet (200 mEq/day of sodium intake for 5–7 days)—when RAAS is suppressed (eg, low serum and urinary aldosterone)—and on a restricted sodium diet (10 mEq/day of sodium intake for 5–7 days)—when RAAS is activated (eg, high serum and urinary aldosterone). Leveraging this unique feature of the data set, in this study, we tested the hypothesis that on a liberal sodium diet, a more ideal cardiovascular health status (higher LS7 score) would be associated with lower aldosterone as compared with those with a less ideal cardiovascular health status (lower LS7 score).
Higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers CRP (C‐reactive protein) and IL‐6 (interleukin‐6) also have been implicated in cardiovascular disease risk. 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Therefore, we also hypothesized that a higher LS7 score would be associated with lower levels of CRP and IL‐6.
METHODS
HyperPATH Group and Its Protocol
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The study included individuals, age 18 to 66 years, who were enrolled as a part of HyperPATH between 1980 and 2011 at 5 international sites: Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, Massachusetts), University of Utah Medical Center (Salt Lake City, Utah), Hospital Broussais (Paris, France), Vanderbilt University (Nashville, Tennessee), and University of Virginia (Charlottesville, Virginia; Figure 1). The studies were approved by the institutional review committee and subjects gave informed consent for the deidentified data to be used for future analyses. The protocol for HyperPATH has been previously published in detail. 23 , 24 In brief, these individuals were previously a part of research protocols investigating the RAAS. Before baseline measurements, there was a 3‐month washout period of all direct mediators of RAAS, including angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, MR antagonists, and a 2‐week washout period of calcium‐channel blockers, beta‐blockers, and diuretic medications. In the HyperPATH protocol, participants were maintained on both liberal sodium diet (200 mEq/day) and restricted sodium diet (10 mEq/day) for at least 5 days each. Participants were admitted to the inpatient clinical research center overnight, where their sodium balance was confirmed with 24‐hour urinary sodium collection: >150 mEq sodium/day for the liberal sodium diet and <30 mEq sodium/day for the restricted sodium diet. This analysis included only individuals who were in liberal or restricted sodium balance. Baseline measurements were collected after overnight supine rest, including blood pressure, serum plasma glucose, total cholesterol, serum aldosterone, plasma renin activity, cortisol, CRP, IL‐6, and serum electrolytes. Following baseline measurements, participants received an infusion of angiotensin II (Ang II) of 3 ng/kg per minute for 60 minutes, after which vital signs and measurements of serum aldosterone and plasma renin activity were repeated. 24
Figure 1. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram of participants in HyperPATH (International Hypertensive Pathotype) consortium database between 1980 and 2011.

Individuals with a complete Life's Simple 7 data set were included for analyses. Ang II indicates angiotensin II; CRP, C‐reactive protein; IL‐6, interleukin‐6; and SASSI, sodium‐modulated aldosterone suppression‐stimulation index.
Defining Life's Simple 7
Individuals who did not have complete LS7 data were excluded from analysis. In total, this study included 379 individuals. The definitions of the LS7 variables were adapted from the American Heart Association 5 and categorized as “ideal,” “intermediate,” or “poor.” A numerical value of 2 was assigned for variables that met the criteria for “ideal,” 1 was assigned for variables that met the criteria for “intermediate,” and 0 was assigned to variables that met criteria for “poor.” A summative LS7 score was generated, with a maximum score of 14. Based on the distribution of the LS7 scores in this population, LS7 summative score categories were designated as inadequate (LS7 score 3–6), average (LS7 score 7–10), and optimal (LS7 score 11–14).
Blood Pressure
Baseline blood pressure was measured after overnight supine rest at the clinical research centers. Ideal blood pressure was defined as systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg in individuals without hypertension and not on any antihypertensive medications; intermediate blood pressure was defined as systolic blood pressure 120 to 139 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure 80 to 89 mm Hg or hypertension that was treated to goal; poor blood pressure was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg.
Fasting Plasma Glucose
Baseline fasting plasma blood glucose was measured after overnight supine fast at the clinical research centers. Ideal plasma glucose was defined as fasting plasma glucose of <100 mg/dL without a history of diabetes and antidiabetic medications, intermediate plasma glucose was defined as 100 to 125 mg/dL or treated to goal; poor was defined as fasting plasma glucose of ≥126 mg/dL.
Total Cholesterol
Baseline total cholesterol was measured after overnight supine fast at the clinical research centers. Ideal total cholesterol was defined as <200 mg/dL without treatment; intermediate total cholesterol was defined as 200 to 239 mg/dL; a poor total cholesterol was defined as ≥240 mg/dL.
Smoking
Smoking history was self‐reported at screening. Ideal smoking status was defined as a lifetime nonsmoker; intermediate smoking status was defined as former smoker, poor smoking status was defined as current smoker.
Body Mass Index
BMI was calculated from weight and height at screening. Ideal BMI was defined as <25 kg/m2; intermediate BMI was defined as 25 to 29.9 kg/m2; poor BMI was defined as ≥30 kg/m2.
Physical Activity
Physical activity level was self‐reported at screening. Ideal physical activity was defined as a self‐reported “high” level of exercise; intermediate physical activity was defined as a self‐reported “moderate” or “mild” exercise; poor physical activity was defined as a self‐reported “sedentary” lifestyle.
Diet Score
Comprehensive dietary history was not available for the HyperPATH individuals. A self‐reported measurement of salt intake was used as a surrogate. Ideal diet was defined as a self‐reported salt intake of “no added salt”; intermediate diet was defined as a self‐reported salt intake of “minimal salt”; poor diet was defined as a self‐reported salt intake of “no salt limit.”
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX). Primary analysis included individuals with complete LS7 data and who were in sodium balance. Skewness Kurtosis test was performed on all dependent variables to test for normality. The data presented in Tables 1 and 2 include the mean and SDs for each continuous variable, and the number and percentage of individuals within each group for the categorical variables. P for trend was calculated using “nptrend” in Stata, which tests for trend across ordered groups. Trends were defined by the differences across 3 LS7 score categories. The main analysis included multivariable linear regression analyses to analyze the relationship between LS7 score categories and biomarker levels, while controlling for covariates of age, self‐identified sex, self‐identified race, serum creatinine, and study site (Boston, Massachusetts; Salt Lake City, Utah; Paris, France; Nashville, Tennessee; Charlottesville, Virginia). Covariates were selected a priori and treated as fixed effects. Linear regression analyses were performed for normally distributed continuous variables and logarithmically transformed nonnormally distributed variables. For Figure 2, the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was used to compare the distribution of LS7 scores between male versus female individuals and between White versus Black individuals. Statistical significance was indicated by 2‐sided P value of <0.05.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics
| Inadequate (LS7 score 3–6) n=95 | Average (LS7 score 7–10) n=238 | Optimal (LS7 score 11–14) n=46 | P for trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||||
| Age, y±SD | 48.3±7.9 | 47.5±9.6 | 43.1±12.6 | 0.015 |
| Female sex, n (%) | 44 (46.3%) | 116 (48.7%) | 23 (50%) | 0.643 |
| Black race, n (%) | 16 (17.2%) | 39 (16.5%) | 4 (8.7%) | 0.340 |
| White race, n (%) | 77 (82.8%) | 190 (79.8%) | 41 (89.1%) | 0.340 |
| Life's Simple 7 components | ||||
| Smoking score*±SD | 1.2±0.8 | 1.7±0.6 | 1.9±0.2 | <0.001 |
| Exercise score†±SD | 0.5±0.5 | 0.9±0.6 | 1.4±0.6 | <0.001 |
| Salt intake score‡±SD | 0.5±0.6 | 1.1±0.8 | 1.6±0.7 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 90 (94.7%) | 204 (85.7%) | 27 (58.7%) | <0.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg±SD | 154±21 | 143±20 | 125±19 | <0.001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg±SD | 91±13 | 84±11 | 76±13 | <0.001 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2±SD | 29.8±3.8 | 28.3±4.4 | 23.9±2.4 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 12 (12.6%) | 9 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | <0.001 |
| Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL±SD | 102±19 | 90±11 | 84±11 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL±SD | 215±35 | 192±37 | 157±28 | <0.001 |
| On statin, n (%) | 7 (7%) | 20 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 0.633 |
The table summarizes the baseline demographics and Life's Simple 7 (LS7) component variables in the 3 LS7 score categories as the mean (SD) for continuous variables or count (percentage) for categorical variables. P for trend was calculated for comparison between the groups.
Smoking score: 0=current smoker; 1=former smoker; 2=lifetime nonsmoker.
Exercise score: 0=sedentary; 1=some/moderate exercise level; 2=high exercise level.
Salt intake score: 0=little or no effort to control salt; 1=no added salt, avoids salty foods; 2=no added salt, no salty food.
Table 2.
Summary of Measurements of Aldosterone and RAAS in the Total Population and After Excluding Primary Aldosteronism
| Total population | Excluding primary aldosteronism | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inadequate (N=95) | Average (N=238) | Optimal (N=46) | P for trend | Inadequate (N=91) | Average (N=234) | Optimal (N=46) | P for trend | |
| Serum aldosterone, ng/dL | 6.25 (6.25) | 4.74 (3.16) | 3.68 (2.10) | <0.001 | 5.07 (3.0) | 4.43 (2.54) | 3.68 (2.09) | 0.008 |
| Urinary aldosterone, mcg/24 h | 13.87 (9.05) | 10.95 (7.1) | 8.64 (4.27) | <0.001 | 12.37 (7.32) | 10.64 (6.89) | 8.64 (4.27) | 0.002 |
| Plasma renin activity, ng/mL per h | 0.62 (0.55) | 0.47 (0.48) | 0.32 (0.29) | 0.001 | 0.57 (0.48) | 0.47 (0.48) | 0.32 (0.29) | 0.004 |
| Change in aldosterone after angiotensin II infusion, ng/dL | 8.79 (5.28) | 8.91 (6.44) | 6.32 (4.27) | 0.018 | 8.49 (5.05) | 8.91 (6.46) | 6.32 (4.72) | 0.029 |
| Sodium‐modulated aldosterone suppression‐stimulation index score | 0.48 (0.49) | 0.36 (0.28) | 0.29 (0.20) | 0.007 | 0.43 (0.46) | 0.35 (0.26) | 0.29 (0.20) | 0.044 |
Summary of outcome variables are presented as the mean (SD). P for trend was calculated between the 3 groups both in the total population and after excluding individuals who met criteria for primary aldosteronism. RAAS indicates renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system.
Figure 2. Distribution of LS7 score.

A, Distribution of LS7 score in overall study population (mean 8.03±2.14). B, Distribution of LS7 sScore in White (mean 8.04±2.17) and Black (mean 7.95±2.08) participants (P=0.3402). C, Distribution of LS7 score in male (mean 7.98±2.18) and female (mean 8.09±2.10) participants (P=0.6430). The Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was used to compare the distribution of LS7 scores between groups. LS7 indicates Life's Simple 7.
RESULTS
Study Population
In total, 379 individuals had complete LS7 data in the HyperPATH database (1980–2011) and were included in the analysis: 95 in the inadequate score category, 238 in the average score category, and 46 in the optimal score category (Table 1). The percentage of individuals who were women, as well as those who were White or Black, did not significantly differ between the score categories. The mean age of the participants in the optimal LS7 score category was 43.1 years old compared with 47.5 in the average LS7 score category and 48.3 in the inadequate LS7 score category.
The LS7 scores were normally distributed, ranging from 3 to 14, with a mean of 8.03±2.14 in the overall population (Figure 2). There were no significant differences in the distribution of LS7 scores in the White participants (mean 8.04±2.17) versus Black participants (mean 7.95±2.08; P=0.6237) or in the men (mean 7.98±2.18) versus women (mean 8.09±2.10; P=0.7537).
Liberal Sodium Diet
Aldosterone
When on a liberal sodium diet (24‐hour urinary sodium >150 mEq/L per 24 hours), individuals in the optimal LS7 score category had a significantly lower serum aldosterone as compared with the average LS7 score category (P=0.048) and inadequate score category (P=0.031; Figure 3). Similarly, those in the optimal LS7 score category had significantly lower urinary aldosterone (P=0.006) as well as lower plasma renin activity (P=0.007) as compared with those in the inadequate LS7 score category. Notably, there were no significant differences in 24‐hour urinary sodium (Figure 3), or serum cortisol, serum creatinine, or serum potassium between the 3 score categories (Table S1).
Figure 3. The association of LS7 score category and serum aldosterone (P‐trend<0.001) (A), urinary aldosterone (P‐trend=0.001) (B), plasma renin activity (P‐trend<0.001) (C), 24‐hour urinary sodium (P‐trend=0.202) (D) on a liberal sodium diet.

LS7 indicates Life's Simple 7.
When on a liberal sodium diet, individuals in the optimal LS7 score category had a blunted increase in aldosterone with Ang II infusion (Ang II‐stimulated aldosterone minus baseline aldosterone) as compared with the average and inadequate LS7 score categories (P=0.005 and P=0.031, respectively; Figure 4).
Figure 4. The association of LS7 score category and the change in aldosterone after angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion (P‐trend=0.023) (A), and sodium‐modulated aldosterone suppression‐to‐stimulation (SASSI) index (P‐trend=0.022) (B) on a liberal sodium diet.

LS7 indicates Life's Simple 7.
Ideally, aldosterone is increased on a low sodium diet and decreased on a liberal sodium diet. The ability to modulate aldosterone is captured by a lower sodium‐modulated‐aldosterone suppression to stimulation index (SASSI), which is the serum aldosterone on a liberal sodium diet divided by serum aldosterone on a restricted sodium diet. 25 Our analysis showed that a higher LS7 score category was associated with a lower SASSI score (Figure 4): the optimal LS7 score group had a significantly lower SASSI score than the inadequate group (P=0.005); the average LS7 score group had a significantly lower SASSI score than the inadequate group (P=0.008).
In a secondary analysis, we analyzed individuals for evidence of autonomous aldosterone production. There were 8 individuals who met criteria for primary aldosteronism (serum aldosterone ≥15 ng/dL with suppressed plasma renin activity ≤1.0 when on a liberal sodium diet with urinary sodium >150 mEq/L per 24 hours): 4 individuals were in the inadequate LS7 score category, and 4 individuals were in the average LS7 score category; there were no individuals who met criteria for primary aldosteronism in the optimal LS7 score category. Removing these 8 individuals from the data analysis did not change the results of the association between better LS7 score category and lower aldosterone levels (Table 2).
CRP and Il‐6
Beyond aldosterone levels, we also found that a higher LS7 score category was associated with lower levels of inflammatory markers of CRP (P=0.001). In addition, those in the optimal LS7 score category had lower IL‐6 levels when compared with those in the average LS7 score category (P=0.026; Figure 5).
Figure 5. The association of LS7 score category and C‐reactive protein; P‐trend=0.001) (A), and Interleukin‐6 (P‐trend=0.001) (B) on liberal sodium diet.

CRP indicates C‐reactive protein; IL‐6, interleukin‐6; and LS7, Life's Simple 7.
Restricted Sodium Diet
For participants on the restricted sodium diet, we did not find significant differences in the association between LS7 score categories and serum or urinary aldosterone, plasma renin activity, change in aldosterone after Ang II stimulation, or CRP (Table S1). We did see that the optimal LS7 score category was associated with lower IL‐6 as compared with the inadequate LS7 score category (P=0.017) and the average LS7 score category (P=0.026).
DISCUSSION
Our study found significant associations between a more ideal cardiovascular health status (higher LS7 score category) and lower levels of serum and urinary aldosterone, lower plasma renin activity, lower change in aldosterone after Ang II stimulation, and lower levels of CRP and IL‐6 while on a controlled liberal sodium diet. The association between a higher LS7 score and lower serum aldosterone in our study is consistent with the findings by Kesireddy et al in a Black population. 10 We have now demonstrated these results in a predominantly White population. Additionally, given the controlled dietary sodium, we found that these results were not driven by alterations in sodium balance within the study population. Thus, on a liberal sodium diet, maintaining better cardiovascular health is associated with lower levels of IL‐6, CRP, and aldosterone—known mediators of cardiovascular disease. Of note, in a forward stepwise regression analysis, we found that it was not one component variable of the LS7 score that was responsible for the significant differences in the dependent variables between the LS7 score categories (Table S2).
The differences in aldosterone appear to be driven by a downregulation of RAAS with the lowest plasma renin activity in the optimal LS7 score category. Interestingly, although one could have hypothesized that a lower plasma renin activity would lead to lower circulating Ang II levels, and an upregulation of Ang II receptor 1 activity, and thus, an increased aldosterone response to Ang II infusion—we found the opposite was true. Those in the optimal LS7 score category had a blunted aldosterone response to Ang II infusion on a liberal sodium diet. We demonstrated that the differences in aldosterone responsiveness were not attributable to differences in urinary sodium, serum potassium or adrenocorticotropic hormone/cortisol axis activity, which were similar across the 3 LS7 score categories. We exonerated primary aldosteronism as a driver of the differences between the score categories by performing a secondary analysis in which we removed the 8 individuals with primary aldosteronism.
For normal physiology, it is important to be able to increase aldosterone on a low sodium diet and decrease aldosterone on a high sodium diet. Vaidya et al defined the SASSI as the serum aldosterone on a liberal sodium diet divided by serum aldosterone on a restricted sodium diet, with lower SASSI score reflecting more optimal RAAS responsiveness to dietary sodium. In our study, we found that those with a higher LS7 score category had a lower SASSI score suggesting that those with more ideal cardiovascular health are better able to turn off aldosterone on a liberal sodium diet and turn on aldosterone on a restricted sodium diet. This is consistent with the concept that a lower SASSI score is associated with better cardiovascular health. In a cross‐sectional analysis of individuals with and without mild hypertension, a lower SASSI score was associated with a smaller number of metabolic syndrome components. 25
Our findings suggest that greater achievement of LS7 is associated with lower aldosterone levels and a blunted response to Ang II, which are known mediators of cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if the blunted response to Ang II is limited to the adrenal gland. Interestingly, the systolic blood pressure in response to Ang II was not significantly different between the 3 LS7 score categories, suggesting the differences in Ang II responsiveness may not extend to vascular reactivity.
In addition, we found that higher LS7 score was associated with lower levels of IL‐6 and CRP, which are mediators of inflammation and cardiovascular injury. Although the mean levels of CRP and IL‐6 in all 3 LS7 score categories were within the normal reference range, it is unknown how chronically higher levels of inflammatory makers could affect cardiovascular health.
Lower IL‐6 levels were found in the optimal LS7 score category in individuals on both restricted and liberal sodium diets. In contrast, CRP and aldosterone levels were significantly lower in the optimal LS7 score category on the liberal sodium diets, but the levels were similar in the 3 LS7 score categories on the restricted sodium diet. Because the majority of the US population consume a liberal sodium diet under normal conditions, 26 the finding of lower aldosterone, CRP, and IL‐6 on the liberal sodium diet is clinically relevant. High sodium intake has been associated with hypertension and increased cardiovascular disease risk. 27 , 28 The observation that when dietary sodium is restricted, aldosterone and other inflammatory marker levels in the inadequate LS7 score group are not significantly higher than the levels in the optimal LS7 score group suggests that limiting sodium intake could be a potential opportunity for intervention.
There are limitations to the findings of this study. In defining the behavioral LS7 variables (smoking, diet, and exercise), we relied on self‐reported data, which are susceptible to bias. In addition, we did not have the full dietary history of the participants. Instead, we used a self‐reported average sodium intake measurement as a surrogate variable. The population included in the analyses was predominately White and generally healthy individuals, with and without mild hypertension. Therefore, the results may not be readily extrapolated to the general population. Although the HyperPATH database includes both White and Black individuals, there were not enough Black individuals to perform a subanalysis among Black individuals alone. However, when the analyses were repeated in only the White individuals, our results were maintained indicating that the results were not driven by the Black individuals. Finally, because this is a cross‐sectional study, we do not know whether improving LS7 score categories would also improve levels of aldosterone, CRP, and IL‐6. Also of note, the American Heart Association recently put forth updated guidelines for cardiovascular health achievement, which now includes an eighth variable of sleep. 29 Because the HyperPATH database did not capture sleep data, we did not include this as a part of our analyses.
Conclusions
The findings of this study—higher LS7 achievement is associated with lower levels of aldosterone, IL‐6, and CRP—may help to explain the findings of previous studies showing an association between greater LS7 achievement and lower cardiovascular disease risk. 30
It is known that overactivation of RAAS and increased inflammation contribute to cardiovascular disease. Therefore, a greater understanding of the mechanisms that allow a downregulation of these systems could lead to better biological and behavioral targets that improve cardiovascular health.
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants 5K24HL103845‐10 (GKA), 5T32HL007609‐35 (GKA), and 5K23HL155076 (AVH).
Disclosures
None.
Supporting information
Tables S1–S2
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge staff of the human research centers in which these intervention studies were performed. This work was also conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst/The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL1 TR002541) and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers, or the National Institutes of Health.
This article was sent to Ferhaan Ahmad, MD, PhD, Senior Associate Editor, for review by expert referees, editorial decision, and final disposition.
Supplemental Material is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/JAHA.122.028718
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 9.
REFERENCES
- 1. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, Himmelfarb CD, Khera A, Lloyd‐Jones D, McEvoy JW, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e563–e595. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Vadiveloo M, Hu FB, Kris‐Etherton PM, Rebholz CM, Sacks FM, Thorndike AN, Van Horn L, Wylie‐Rosett J. 2021 dietary guidance to improve cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144:e472–e487. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lavie CJ, Ozemek C, Carbone S, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN. Sedentary behavior, exercise, and cardiovascular health. Circ Res. 2019;124:799–815. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kondo T, Nakano Y, Adachi S, Murohara T. Effects of tobacco smoking on cardiovascular disease. Circ J. 2019;83:1980–1985. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lloyd‐Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L, Greenlund K, Daniels S, Nicho G, Tomaselli GF, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121:586–613. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Enserro DM, Vasan RS, Xanthakis V. Twenty‐year trends in the American Heart Association cardiovascular health score and impact on subclinical and clinical cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Offspring Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008741. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Booth JN, Abdalla M, Tanner RM, Diaz KM, Bromfield SG, Tajeu GS, Correa A, Sims M, Ogedegbe G, Bress AP, et al. Cardiovascular health and incident hypertension in blacks. Hypertension. 2017;70:285–292. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Plante TB, Koh I, Judd SE, Howard G, Howard VJ, Zakai NA, Booth JN, Safford MM, Muntner P, Cushman M. Life's Simple 7 and incident hypertension: the REGARDS study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e016482. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Akinyelure OP, Sakhuja S, Colvin CL, Clark D, Jaeger BC, Hardy ST, Howard G, Cohen LP, Irvin MR, Tanner R, et al. Cardiovascular health and transition from controlled blood pressure to apparent treatment resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2020;76:1953–1961. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kesireddy V, Tan Y, Kline D, Brock G, Odei JB, Kluwe B, Effoe VS, Echouffo Tcheugui JB, Kalyani RR, Sims M, et al. The association of Life's Simple 7 with aldosterone among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study. Nutrients. 2019;11:955–972. doi: 10.3390/nu11050955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Buonafine M, Bonnard B, Jaisser F. Mineralocorticoid receptor and cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens. 2018;31:1165–1174. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Parksook WW, Williams GH. Aldosterone and cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;119:28–44. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Vaidya A, Carey RM. Evolution of the primary aldosteronism syndrome: updating the approach. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:3771–3783. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Funder JW. The role of aldosterone and mineralocorticoid receptors in cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007;7:151–157. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200707030-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bakris GL, Agarwal R, Anker SD, Pitt B, Ruilope LM, Rossing P, Kolkhof R, Nowack C, Schloemer P, Joseph A, et al. Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2219–2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2025845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:709–717. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909023411001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pitt B, Filippatos G, Agarwal R, Anker SD, Bakris GL, Rossing P, Joseph A, Kolkhof P, Nowack C, Schloemer P, et al. Cardiovascular events with finerenone in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:2252–2263. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wainstein MV, Mossmann M, Araujo GN, Gonçalves SC, Gravina GL, Sangalli M, Veadrigo F, Matte R, Reich R, Costa FG, et al. Elevated serum interleukin‐6 is predictive of coronary artery disease in intermediate risk overweight patients referred for coronary angiography. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017;9:67. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0266-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cozlea DL, Farcas DM, Nagy A, Keresztesi AA, Tifrea R, Cozlea L, Carașca E. The impact of C reactive protein on global cardiovascular risk on patients with coronary artery disease. Curr Health Sci J. 2013;39:225–231. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. van der Meer IM, de Maat MPM, Kiliaan AJ, van der Kuip DAM, Hofman A, Witteman JCM. The value of C‐reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1323–1328. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.11.1323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kaura A, Hartley A, Panoulas V, Glampson B, Shah ASV, Davies J, Mulla A, Woods K, Omigie J, Shah AD, et al. Mortality risk prediction of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein in suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study. PLoS Med. 2022;19:e1003911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Pennells L, Wood AM, White IR, Gao P, Walker M, Thompson A, Sarwar N, Caslake M, et al. C‐reactive protein, fibrinogen, and cardiovascular disease prediction. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1310–1320. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Underwood PC, Sun B, Williams JS, Pojoga LH, Chamarthi B, Lasky‐Su J, Raby BA, Hopkins PN, Jeunemaitre X, Brown NJ, et al. The relationship between peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐gamma and renin: a human genetics study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:E75–E79. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Chamarthi B, Williams JS, Williams GH. A mechanism for salt‐sensitive hypertension: abnormal dietary sodium‐mediated vascular response to angiotensin‐II. J Hypertens. 2010;28:1020–1026. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283375974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Vaidya A, Underwood PC, Hopkins PN, Jeunemaitre X, Ferri C, Williams GH, Adler GK. Abnormal aldosterone physiology and cardiometabolic risk factors. Hypertension. 2013;61:886–893. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jackson SL, King SM, Zhao L, Cogswell ME. Prevalence of excess sodium intake in the United States—NHANES, 2009–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;64:1393–1397. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6452a1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Frisoli TM, Schmieder RE, Grodzicki T, Messerli FH. Salt and hypertension: is salt dietary reduction worth the effort? Am J Med. 2012;125:433–439. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ma Y, He FJ, Sun Q, Yuan C, Kieneker LM, Curhan GC, MacGregor GA, Bakker SJL, Campbell NRC, Wang M, et al. 24‐hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:252–263. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lloyd‐Jones DM, Allen NB, Anderson CAM, Black T, Brewer LC, Foraker RE, Grandner MA, Lavretsky H, Perak AM, Sharma G, et al. Life's Essential 8: updating and enhancing the American Heart Association's construct of cardiovascular health: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;146:e18–e43. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hasbani NR, Ligthart S, Brown MR, Heath AS, Bebo A, Ashley KE, Boerwinkle E, Morrison AC, Folsom AR, Aguilar D, et al. American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7: lifestyle recommendations, polygenic risk, and lifetime risk of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2022;145:808–818. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Tables S1–S2
