Background
Child marriage is recognised as a harmful practice. Recently, Indonesia enacted a new law to raise the minimum age of marriage from 16 to 19 years old for women, creating no minimum age difference between males and females. However, this improvement may be detrimental for individuals in remote areas with no legal documentation and the common practices of age falsification to reach the minimum age of marriage. Therefore, implementing an age estimation technique for juveniles is mandatory to reduce the risk of child marriage. Methods: this study used the third molar maturity index (I3M) to distinguish an individual under or over 19 years old. I3M values from 222 digital OPGs aged between 15 to 23.99 years were calculated. The sample was randomly assigned as a training dataset (n = 156) and testing dataset (n = 66). The logistic regression model was created using a 5-fold cross-validation method, and the Youden's Index Value was used to establish the I3M cut-off value. Results: the logistic regression model showed significance in both sex and I3M value for predicting the probability of minimum age of marriage. I3M cut-off values of 0.08 and 0.09 for males and females, respectively, were taken. The accuracy of this test was 80% for both sexes in the testing dataset. Conclusions: the outcome of this pilot study showed a promising result of using I3M as a dental age estimation method to determine whether an individual is over or under 19 years old to comply with the newly enacted legal age of marriage in Indonesia. Future research should be carried out using a balanced age cohort for each sex and a more extensive training sample size to investigate the influence of sex in the cut-off value calculation.
Keywords: Dental Age Estimation;
Keywords: Third Molar;
Keywords: Legal Age;
Keywords: Child Marriage;
INTRODUCTION
In forensic sciences, determining an individual's age is a vital objective acquired through legal documents, including a medical chart or birth certificate. In the absence of these documents, an individual’s chronological age can be estimated through various age-related variables, including teeth. Dental development is highly correlated with chronological age, creating diverse methods to estimate an individual's age.
The practice of dental age estimation has been used in juveniles to determine whether an individual has passed a certain legal age threshold. (1) At this age range, the third molar is the only tooth left to mineralise. (2) Hence, third molar development was commonly used as the main parameter to differentiate between specific age threshold in juveniles. (3, 4)
However, most third molar development techniques have been divided into a finite number of stages, (5, 6) creating a higher error rate if the observed tooth falls between a particular stage. (7) To overcome this limitation, Cameriere et al. researched the Third Molar Maturity Index (I3M) technique, a ratio measurement on orthopantomogram (OPG) images of mandibular third molar and was proven to help distinguish an individual in different legal age thresholds. (8)
In Indonesia, a new law has been enacted to prevent child marriage. (9) It is commonly known that child marriage is a harmful practice. (10) It promotes a higher incidence of sexually transmitted disease, (11) intimate partner violence, (12) and lower economic and educational quality. (13) To prevent this, Indonesia’s new law raised the minimum age of marriage from 16 to 19 years old for women, creating no difference between male and female minimum age of marriage. However, applying the new legal age of marriage threshold is difficult for individuals with no legal documents to prove their age. (14) For example, some individuals in rural areas may not have legal documentation or recorded birth date in a medical chart. Consequently, the absence of legal documentation promotes the legal documentation forging to falsify an individual's age to reach the required minimum age of marriage. (15)
Although using the I3M technique or dental age estimation method to determine an individual age threshold is widely used in many countries, dental age estimation is still not commonly used in Indonesian courts. Considering that it is vital to adopt an accurate age estimation method when confronted with a legal age threshold for an individual with no legal documentation and prevent age falsification, a new study in Indonesian law to implement the applicability of the I3M method is needed as there are no studies in determining I3M cut-off value for Indonesian population who are younger or older than 19 years old for both male and female. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the application of the I3M technique to predict whether an individual is younger (< 19 years old) or older than the minimum age of marriage (≥ 19 years old).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sample
In this retrospective observational study, we collected a total of 222 digital OPG images (M = 73, F = 149) from Indonesian children and juveniles between 15 and 23.99 years old from Pramita Laboratory, Semarang, Indonesia. The sample was selected based on the presence and clarity of the lower left mandibular third molar (LL3rdM) without any recorded developmental abnormalities or dental treatment. The anonymity of the sample was preserved while maintaining the information of patient number, sex, date of birth, and date of exposure. Sample age was obtained from the difference between the date of exposure and the date of birth. The required ethical approval was obtained from the institute’s ethics committee.
Measurements
Images were imported and enhanced for optimal visualization using Adobe Photoshop CC 2020 software built-in tools. Furthermore, LL3rdM measurement was performed by the first observer (RMB) in conjunction with Cameriere et al. method. (16) The observer was blinded to the actual age of the image during the measurement. Tooth apical ends and length were analysed, and the I3M was defined as follows: if the root development of LL3rdM was complete, the value of I3M = 0. I3M was calculated by the sum of total tooth apical ends inner margins (A8 = A81 + A82) divided by tooth length (L) from apical ends to the highest point of the crown (). If the tooth had not developed a bifurcation, the length between the inner crown margins was considered tooth apical end (A8) (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Measurement example of third molar maturity index (I3M). Root development was completed, I3M = 0 (a). The distinct approach was applied when the tooth has developed a bifurcation () (b), or not ()
Statistical Analysis
Measurements were collated in an Excel file (Microsoft Excel 365) and processed using R. (16) Twenty five images were randomly selected after two weeks and recalculated by RMB and second observer (HE). RMB had over three years of experience, and HE had just been introduced to dental age estimation. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the Intra- Inter-Observer Reliability using the psych package. (17)
The Caret package was used to calculate the k-fold cross-validation and the linear model. (18) Consequently, 70 percent of the data were randomly selected (set.seed = 100) and assigned as a training dataset (n = 156). The remaining data were used as a testing dataset (n = 66). A logistic regression model was created on the dataset using 5-fold cross-validation with dependent variables of T = 1 and T = 0 for an individual over and under 19 years old, and predictive variables of I3M and sex with s = 1 and s = 0 for male and female, respectively. The model's predictive accuracy was determined using the receiver operating curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC). Furthermore, the optimal cut-off value was established using the highest Youden's index (J) value with the cutpointr package. (19)
The cut-off value performance was established in the testing dataset by the terms of accuracy (Eq. 1), Sensitivity (Se) or the percentage of the subjects ≥ 19 years old who had I3M < cut-off value, and Specificity (Sp) or the percentage of the subjects < 19 years old who had I3M ≥ cut-off value was calculated as follows:
![]() |
![]() |
TP (True Positive) represented the results of those who were ≥ 19 years old and had I3M ≤ cut-off value. Alternatively, the results of those who were < 19 years old and had I3M > cut-off value were described as TN (True Negative). FP (False Positive) was the result of those who were < 19 years old and had I3M ≤ cut-off value. Finally, those who were ≥ 19 and had I3M > cut-off value listed as FN (False Negative).
Further evaluation of the model performance was done by calculating the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR +, LR -). PPV and NPV were calculated to examine how many of each positive (≥ 19 years old) and negative (< 19 years old) were correctly classified. LR+ indicated how many TP would be observed per FP. LR- indicated how many FN would be observed per TN.
Bayes post-test probability was calculated (Eq. 2) to help I3M cut-off value distinguished individuals < 19 years old from individuals ≥ 19 years old (i.e., the proportion of individuals with I3M ≤ cut-off value which was ≥ 19 years old):
Where p was post-test probability and Po was the proportion of individuals in the target population who were ≥ 19 years old, given that they were between 15-23.99 years old. Po was calculated from the data obtained from Statistics Indonesia (Badan Pusat Statistik). (20)
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the distribution of the training and testing dataset. Figure 2 shows the I3M value in each sex, with the first value of I3M = 0 observed in males and females at the age of 21.5 and 20.3 years old, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficient between I3M and age was -0.64 (p < 0.001). The inter- and intra-rater agreement showed excellent results proving the repeatability of the measurement, with an ICC value of 0.98 and 0.96 for inter- and intra-rater agreement, respectively. (21) The logistic regression model displayed the significance of sex (p < 0.001) and I3m (p < 0.001) as independent variables for predicting the minimum age of marriage. The model may be written as follows:
Table 1. Age and sex distribution on training and testing dataset.
| Age (Years) | Male Training Dataset | Female Training Dataset | Total Training Dataset | Male Testing Dataset | Female Testing Dataset | Total Testing Dataset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15-15.99 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| 16-16.99 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| 17-17.99 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 18-18.99 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 19-19.99 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| 20-20.99 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| 21-21.99 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 22-22.99 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 23-23.99 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Total | 52 | 104 | 156 | 21 | 45 | 66 |
Figure 2.
Box plots showing the relationship between I3M value and chronological age between males and females
The ROC curve is presented in Figure 3, with the AUC value of 0.91. As sex became significant as an independent variable, the I3M cut-off value was derived differently for each sex to achieve better accuracy. The I3M for male and female were 0.08 (J = 0.76) and 0.09 (J = 0.76), respectively. The performance of each cut-off value was analysed in the testing dataset with 80% accuracy in both sexes. The female testing dataset achieved better overall performances (Se, Sp, PPV, NPV, LR+, and LR-) (Table 2-4). Bayes post-test probability showed that the probability of male and female subjects, with I3M ≤ the indicated cut-off value for each sex was 19 years old or older, were 0.87 and 0.92, respectively.
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristic curve for ”19 Years or Older” with an Area Under Curve of 0.91
Table 2. Contingency table describing discrimination performance of I3M cut-off value (0.09) on Female testing dataset.
| Females | Age (years) | |
|---|---|---|
| < 19 | ≥ 19 | |
| Prediction | ||
| I3M > 0.09 | 16TN | 8FN |
| I3M ≤ 0.09 | 1FP | 20TP |
TN = True Negative, FN = False Negative, TP = True Positive, FP = False Positive
Table 3. Contingency table describing discrimination performance of I3M cut-off value (0.08) on Male testing dataset.
| Males | Age (years) | |
|---|---|---|
| < 19 | ≥ 19 | |
| Prediction | ||
| I3M > 0.08 | 13TN | 3FN |
| I3M ≤ 0.08 | 1FP | 4TP |
TN = True Negative, FN = False Negative, TP = True Positive, FP = False Positive
Table 4. Performance description of each I3M cut-off value in each sex.
| Males | Females | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Se | 0.57 | 0.71 |
| Sp | 0.92 | 0.94 |
| PPV | 0.57 | 0.71 |
| NPV | 0.92 | 0.94 |
| LR+ | 7.125 | 11.83 |
| LR- | 0.46 | 0.3 |
| PTP | 0.87 | 0.92 |
Se = Sensitivity, Sp = Specificity, PPV = Positive Predictive Value, NPV = Negative Predictive Value, LR+ = Positive Likelihood Ratio, LR- = Negative Likelihood Ratio, PTP = Bayes’ Post-Test Probability
DISCUSSION
![]() |
The use of I3M to determine the legal age of marriage in the Indonesian population showed an acceptable result in this initial study, where the age threshold is one year old higher than the original study. The original study by Cameriere et al. was conducted to determine the probability of an individual being older or younger than 18 years old with a cut-off value of 0.08. (8) This cut-off value has been tested and validated in many countries with high accuracy. (22) Furthermore, the I3M method also has its versatility in the different legal age thresholds. Balla et al. (2019) applied the I3M method to derive a cut-off value to predict if an individual has reached the age of 16 in the Indian population, resulting in a cut-off value of 0.293 with an accuracy of 88 and 88.7 percent for both males and females. (23) Another cut-off value was also calculated in the Indian population to determine whether an individual has reached the age of 14 in compliance with the child labour laws. (24) Hence, a new cut-off value needs to be calculated for each legal age implementation applied in the respective population.
In this study, our finding suggests that the third molar development in Indonesian juveniles was slower than in other countries. This might be explained by the optimal cut-off value achieved by our study sample to reach 19 years old. I3M has a reverse correlation coefficient with chronological age, meaning that the I3M value will decrease as the individual gets older. Furthermore, Santiago et al. (2018) reported that most of the I3M studies have a high accuracy in using the I3M cut-off value of 0.08 to determine the age of the majority, which is 18 years old. (22) Compared to our study, the I3M values only reached 0.08 and 0.09 at the age of 19 years old, which makes the state of I3M value in Indonesian male juveniles in the age of 19 is equal to 18 years old juveniles in other countries, and even less developed in female. This result is in line with Tangmose et al. (2015), who recommended that genetic differences, including ethnic origin, play a vital role in the third molar development rate. (25) However, a direct comparison with other Indonesian populations or other cut-off values with 19 years old age threshold is not available due to the non-existent data.
The I3M cut-off values were taken differently on each sex. This cut-off value separation was done because sex was a significant independent variable in our model (p < 0.001). Furthermore, we observed that deriving the cut-off value equally for both males and females (I3M = 0.094) gave an overall lower accuracy (0.79 for both males and females). However, the difference in cut-off value performance between males and females should be used carefully since the training sample was not balanced between the sexes. It is essential to note that multiple studies with balanced samples found that sex was not a significant predictor in their logistic regression model. (23, 26) Consequently, the choice of differentiating I3M cut-off value between a specific group (i.e., sex) should depend on the significant independent variable in the model or achieving a better particular value.
We present the study result with various performance descriptions in Table 4, most notably the Se and Sp values. In this context of the study, the Se value represents the percentage of subjects over 19 years old and have the I3M below the cut-off value and are therefore correctly specified as an individual who can be married (TP). Thus, a high Se value represents a low FP, which classifies an individual under 19 years old and classified as being able to marry. However, the Se value in the male samples was lower than the female, which could also be explained by the sex imbalance in our training dataset. On the contrary, the Sp value — which represents the percentage of subjects under 19 years old and having I3M above or equal to the cut-off value — was found to be high in both sexes. Moreover, avoiding a higher FP value is commonly done in the field of age estimation. (27)
Our main goal is to help eliminate the practice of child marriage in Indonesia. However, a recent study by Rumble et al. (2018) reported that wealth and education had a significant impact on child marriage (p < 0.05). (28) Furthermore, Grijns et al. (2018) reported that the state legal system was creatively interpreted in rural areas and was commonly influenced by religious beliefs. (15) Further studies should address the major drawback of this study by using balanced age cohorts for each sex to calculate the significance of sex in the logistic model and its cut-off value threshold. After all, these findings showed that eliminating child marriage in Indonesia is a complicated matter and using the I3M value to assess dental age can help to assess the individual’s biological maturity
CONCLUSIONS
The outcome of this pilot study showed a promising result of using I3M as a dental age estimation method to determine whether an individual was over or under 19 years old to comply with the newly enacted legal age of marriage in Indonesia. The results indicate that future research should be carried out using balanced age cohorts for each sex and a more extensive training sample size to investigate the influence of sex in the cut-off value calculation. In addition, incorporating other testing systems, such as psychological evaluation, can be used further to improve the quality of minimum age of marriage assessment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Gunawan Wibisono., DDS, M.Sc, Djoko Priyanto., DDS, M.Sc and Pramita Laboratory Semarang for the assistance in obtaining the OPGs.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
FUNDING
This study is fully funded by the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro internal funds No.85/UN.7.6.4.2/HK/2020.
REFERENCES
- 1.Corradi F, Pinchi V, Barsanti I, Manca R, Garatti S. Optimal age classification of young individuals based on dental evidence in civil and criminal proceedings. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127(6):1157–64. 10.1007/s00414-013-0919-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liversidge H, Marsden P. Estimating age and the likelihood of having attained 18 years of age using mandibular third molars. Brit Dent J 2010;209(8):E13-E. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Mohd Yusof MY, Cauwels R, Martens L. Stages in third molar development and eruption to estimate the 18-year threshold Malay juvenile. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(10):1571–6. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Balla SB, Galic I. P K, Vanin S, De Luca S, Cameriere R. Validation of third molar maturity index (I3M) for discrimination of juvenile/adult status in South Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017;49:2–7. 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gleiser I, Hunt EE, Jr. The permanent mandibular first molar: its calcification, eruption and decay. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1955;13(2):253–83. 10.1002/ajpa.1330130206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harris MJ, Nortje CJ. The mesial root of the third mandibular molar. A possible indicator of age. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1984;2(2):39–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Merdietio Boedi R, Banar N, De Tobel J, Bertels J, Vandermeulen D, Thevissen PW. Effect of Lower Third Molar Segmentations on Automated Tooth Development Staging using a Convolutional Neural Network. J Forensic Sci. 2020;65(2):481–6. 10.1111/1556-4029.14182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cameriere R, Ferrante L, De Angelis D, Scarpino F, Galli F. The comparison between measurement of open apices of third molars and Demirjian stages to test chronological age of over 18 year olds in living subjects. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122(6):493–7. 10.1007/s00414-008-0279-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.People’s Representative Council of Indonesia. Law of Indonesia No. 16/2019. People’s Representative Council of Indonesia; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arthur M, Earle A, Raub A, Vincent I, Atabay E, Latz I, et al. Child Marriage Laws around the World: Minimum Marriage Age, Legal Exceptions, and Gender Disparities. J Women Polit Policy. 2017;39(1):51–74. 10.1080/1554477X.2017.1375786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hindin MJ, Fatusi AO. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health in developing countries: an overview of trends and interventions. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35(2):58–62. 10.1363/3505809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kidman R. Child marriage and intimate partner violence: a comparative study of 34 countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(2):662–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lloyd CB, Mensch BS. Marriage and childbirth as factors in dropping out from school: an analysis of DHS data from sub-Saharan. Popul Stud (Camb). 2008;62(1):1–13. 10.1080/00324720701810840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sumner C. Indonesia’s missing millions: erasing discrimination in birth certification in Indonesia. Cent for Glob Dev. Policy Pap. 2015;64:1–35. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Grijns M, Horii H. Child marriage in a village in West Java (Indonesia): Compromises between legal obligations and religious concerns. Asian J Law Soc. 2018;5(2):453–66. 10.1017/als.2018.9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.R Core Development Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Revelle WR. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. 2017.
- 18.Kuhn M, Wing J, Weston S, Williams A, Keefer C, Engelhardt A, et al. Package ‘caret’. R J. 2020;223:7. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thiele C, Hirschfeld G. cutpointr: Improved Estimation and Validation of Optimal Cutpoints in R. J Stat Softw. 2020;10(2):1–40. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Statistik BP. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2020. Stat Indonesia; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Perinetti G. StaTips Part IV: Selection, interpretation and reporting of the intraclass correlation coefficient. South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res. 2018;5(1):3–5. 10.5937/sejodr5-17434 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Santiago BM, Almeida L, Cavalcanti YW, Magno MB, Maia LC. Accuracy of the third molar maturity index in assessing the legal age of 18 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132(4):1167–84. 10.1007/s00414-017-1766-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Balla SB, Chinni SS, Galic I, Alwala AM, Machani P, Cameriere R. A cut-off value of third molar maturity index for indicating a minimum age of criminal responsibility: Older or younger than 16 years? J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;65:108–12. 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Balla SB, Banda TR, Galic I. N NM, Naishadham PP. Validation of Cameriere’s third molar maturity index alone and in combination with apical maturity of permanent mandibular second molar for indicating legal age of 14 years in a sample of South Indian children. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;297:243–8. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tangmose S, Thevissen P, Lynnerup N, Willems G, Boldsen J. Age estimation in the living: Transition analysis on developing third molars. Forensic Sci Int 2015;257:512 e1- e7. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Boyacioglu Dogru H, Gulsahi A, Cehreli SB, Galic I, van der Stelt P, Cameriere R. Age of majority assessment in Dutch individuals based on Cameriere's third molar maturity index. Forensic Sci Int 2018;282:231 e1- e6. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Akkaya N, Yilanci HÖ. Assessment of third molar maturity index for legal age threshold of 18 in a sample of Turkish individuals. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2021;53(3):314–24. 10.1080/00450618.2020.1729412 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rumble L, Peterman A, Irdiana N, Triyana M, Minnick E. An empirical exploration of female child marriage determinants in Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):407–13. 10.1186/s12889-018-5313-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






