Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 May 30;12:e86023. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86023

Hypermetabolism in mice carrying a near-complete human chromosome 21

Dylan C Sarver 1,2, Cheng Xu 1,2, Susana Rodriguez 1,2, Susan Aja 2,3, Andrew E Jaffe 4,5,6,7,8,9, Feng J Gao 1, Michael Delannoy 10, Muthu Periasamy 11,12, Yasuhiro Kazuki 13,14, Mitsuo Oshimura 14, Roger H Reeves 1,8, G William Wong 1,2,
Editors: Akira Shinohara15, Carlos Isales16
PMCID: PMC10229126  PMID: 37249575

Abstract

The consequences of aneuploidy have traditionally been studied in cell and animal models in which the extrachromosomal DNA is from the same species. Here, we explore a fundamental question concerning the impact of aneuploidy on systemic metabolism using a non-mosaic transchromosomic mouse model (TcMAC21) carrying a near-complete human chromosome 21. Independent of diets and housing temperatures, TcMAC21 mice consume more calories, are hyperactive and hypermetabolic, remain consistently lean and profoundly insulin sensitive, and have a higher body temperature. The hypermetabolism and elevated thermogenesis are likely due to a combination of increased activity level and sarcolipin overexpression in the skeletal muscle, resulting in futile sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) activity and energy dissipation. Mitochondrial respiration is also markedly increased in skeletal muscle to meet the high ATP demand created by the futile cycle and hyperactivity. This serendipitous discovery provides proof-of-concept that sarcolipin-mediated thermogenesis via uncoupling of the SERCA pump can be harnessed to promote energy expenditure and metabolic health.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

The presence of an extra chromosome in mammals is generally lethal during fetal development, due to widespread cellular havoc caused by misregulated gene expression arising from gene dosage imbalance (Zhu et al., 2018). Down syndrome (DS), resulting from trisomy of chromosome 21, is one of the rare aneuploidies compatible with life although as many as 80% of trisomy 21 conceptuses miscarry (Antonarakis et al., 2020). The increased expression of ~500 transcribed sequences of human chromosome 21 (Hsa21) affects many cell types and organ systems during development and in the postnatal period (Korenberg et al., 1994; Antonarakis, 2017). Humans with trisomy 21 have cognitive deficits, altered craniofacial development, and are at significantly higher risk for congenital heart defects, hearing and vision loss, leukemia, gastrointestinal disease, and early-onset dementia (Antonarakis et al., 2020).

Given the significant impact of intellectual disability on the lives of individuals with DS, research emphasis has naturally focused on the neurological deficits underpinning trisomy 21 (Potier and Reeves, 2016). In addition to developmental abnormalities associated with DS, there is an increasing awareness that adolescents and adults with DS also have an increased incidence of obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes (Van Goor et al., 1997; Bertapelli et al., 2016; Fonseca et al., 2005). Although this was first noted in the 1960s (Milunsky and Neurath, 1968), the underlying cause for these metabolic dysregulations is mostly unknown and largely underexplored. Beyond clinical observations, limited studies have been conducted to determine the physiological underpinnings of metabolic impairments seen in DS (reviewed in Dierssen et al., 2020). Our recent study on the Ts65Dn mouse model represents the most in-depth metabolic analysis, to date, of any DS mouse model (Sarver et al., 2023). However, the segmental trisomic Ts65Dn mouse contains only ~55% of the orthologous protein-coding genes (PCGs) found on Hsa21 (Gupta et al., 2016). In addition, it contains additional trisomic genes from the centromeric region of mouse chromosome 17 (Mmu17) not found in Hsa21, thus complicating the genotype-phenotype relationships (Duchon et al., 2011; Reinholdt et al., 2011).

In the past two decades, more than 20 mouse models of DS have been generated (Herault et al., 2017). Despite their utility in advancing DS research, none of these models recapitulate the full spectrum of human DS. With the exception of Tc1, all the DS mouse models are trisomic for some, but not all, of the orthologous mouse genes found in Hsa21 (Herault et al., 2017). Tc1 is the first mouse model with an independently segregating Hsa21 (O’Doherty et al., 2005). However, Tc1 mice are missing >50 of the 220 PCGs on Hsa21 due to deletion and mutations (Gribble et al., 2013). In addition, Tc1 mice show extensive mosaicism (i.e. the human chromosome is present in zygotes but is lost randomly from cells during development). As a consequence, every mouse has a unique developmental trajectory, complicating the interpretations of results obtained from Tc1 mice. To overcome the limitations of previously generated trisomic mouse models, a transchromosomic mouse model (TcMAC21) carrying an independently segregating and near-complete copy of Hsa21 was recently developed (Kazuki et al., 2020). TcMAC21 is not mosaic and contains 93% of HSA21q PCGs, and is considered the most representative mouse model of DS.

Both mouse and rat that carry a non-mosaic Hsa21 recapitulate many DS phenotypes related to the central nervous system (e.g. reduced cerebellum volume, learning and memory deficit), craniofacial skeleton, and heart (Kazuki et al., 2020; Kazuki et al., 2022). The metabolic phenotype of TcMAC21, however, is unknown and has yet to be examined. The availability of the TcMAC21 mouse model has afforded a unique opportunity to address two fundamental questions: (1) what is the impact of aneuploidy on systemic metabolism; (2) what are the molecular, cellular, and physiological consequences of introducing a foreign (human) chromosome from an evolutionarily distant species into mice?

Unexpectedly, we discovered that TcMAC21 mice have all the hallmarks of hypermetabolism, likely driven by a combination of hyperactivity and elevated mitochondrial respiration and futile sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pump activity in the skeletal muscle as a consequence of endogenous sarcolipin (SLN) overexpression. Our study has provided further evidence and proof-of-concept that endogenous SLN-mediated uncoupling of the SERCA pump can be harnessed for energy dissipation, weight loss, and metabolic health.

Results

Human chromosome 21 genes are differentially expressed and regulated in mouse adipose tissue, liver, and skeletal muscle

TcMAC21 mice carry a non-mosaic and independently segregating mouse artificial chromosome with a near-complete copy of the long arm of human chromosome 21 (Hsa21q) (Kazuki et al., 2020). The Hsa21q in TcMAC21 is comprised of ~37 Mb and 199 PCGs (Figure 1A). RNA-sequencing showed that TcMAC21 mice are capable of expressing Hsa21-derived transcripts in each of the tissues examined, and that gene expression is regulated in a tissue-specific manner. The transcriptional activity map of Hsa21 shows regions of gene expression and repression (Figure 1B). There are three large regions of Hsa21 with little or no transcription activity: 29.5–31.1 Mb, 44.5–44.8 Mb, and 45.3–46.2 Mb. The first gap of transcriptional inactivity contains the PCGs Cldn8 and Cldn17, Girk1, and 33 distinct Krtap (keratin-associated protein) genes. The second transcriptionally inactive area contains 16 Krtap genes, and the third transcriptionally inactive area contains 8 PCGs (Col6a1, Col6a2, Col18a1, Fctd, Lss, Pcbp3, Slc19a1, and Spatc1l). By filtering the transcriptional map to display expressed genes only, we highlighted all the genes with their differential expression profiles across five major metabolic tissues—brown adipose tissue (BAT), inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT), gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT), liver, and skeletal muscle (Figure 1C).

Figure 1. Human chromosome 21 genes are differentially expressed and regulated in mouse adipose tissue, liver, and skeletal muscle.

Figure 1.

(A) Graphical representation of human chromosome 21 (Hsa21) and the entire long arm (Hsa21q) region carried by a mouse artificial chromosome in the transchromosomic mouse model (TcMAC21). Four deletions that occurred during generation of the transchromosomic mice eliminate 14/213 protein-coding genes (PCGs; 7%) and 105/487 predicted or known non-protein-coding genes (NPCGs; 22%) (Kazuki et al., 2020). (B) Global view of transcriptionally expressed and repressed PCG and NPCG regions over the entire Hsa21q across five tissues. Gray box denotes transcript that is not detected. (C) Transcriptional activity map showing only Hsa21 genes expressed by at least one tissue. Gray box denotes transcript that is not detected. (D) Overlap analysis showing shared expression of human PCGs and NPCGs across five tissues. Of the 235 unique human genes expressed by the TcMAC21 mice, 54% are PCGs and 46% are NPCGs. B, brown adipose tissue; iW, inguinal white adipose tissue; gW, gonadal white adipose tissue; L, liver; M, skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius); n.d., not detected. n=5 RNA samples per group per tissue type. Mice were on high-fat diet for 16 weeks at the time of tissue collection.

One of the more striking differences in expression profile is between visceral (gonadal) and subcutaneous (inguinal) white adipose tissue (gWAT and iWAT respectively). gWAT expresses 115 human PCGs while iWAT expresses only 27. A similar pattern can be seen in the non-protein-coding genes (NPCGs). We were unable to detect any Hsa21-derived NPCGs in the iWAT, while in gWAT we observed 37. Overlap analysis was carried out to assess how similar expression profiles were between tissues (Figure 1D). Of the 126 Hsa21-derived PCGs expressed by at least one tissue, a majority (65 total) are shared between BAT, gWAT, liver, and skeletal muscle. Of the 109 Hsa21-derived NPCGs expressed by at least one tissue, the majority (53 total) are uniquely expressed by skeletal muscle. Of note, the liver uniquely expresses 6 PCGs and 2 NPCGs, gWAT 4 and 3, skeletal muscle 3 and 53, BAT 1 and 10, and iWAT 0 and 0. Together, these data indicate that Hsa21-derived transcripts are differentially expressed and regulated across major metabolic tissues in TcMAC21 mice.

Hypermetabolism in TcMAC21 mice fed a standard chow

Having established that Hsa21-derived transcripts are differentially expressed and regulated in mouse organs and tissues, we next asked the impact of the extra human genetic material and genes on systemic metabolism. As previously documented, TcMAC21 pups are born at the same weight as their euploid littermates (Kazuki et al., 2020). However, by 3 months of age TcMAC21 mice fed a standard chow weighed significantly less (~8.5 g) than euploid littermates, and this weight difference remained stable over time (Figure 2A). The size and body weight differences were not due to reduced plasma IGF-1 and growth hormone, as their circulating levels were in fact higher in TcMAC21 compared to euploid mice (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Body composition analysis showed that TcMAC21 have significantly reduced absolute and relative (normalized to body weight) fat mass (Figure 2B). Although the absolute lean mass was reduced in TcMAC21 mice, the relative lean mass (normalized to body weight) was not different between genotypes (Figure 2B). Tissue collection at termination of the study also showed smaller visceral and subcutaneous fat mass and liver weight in TcMAC21 mice (Supplementary file 1).

Figure 2. Hypermetabolism in TcMAC21 mice fed a standard chow.

(A) Body weights of mice fed a standard chow. (B) Body composition analysis of fat and lean mass (relative to body weight). (C) Absolute and relative (normalized to body weight) food intake over a 24 hr period. (D–F) Energy expenditure (EE) and physical activity level over 24 hr period in ad libitum chow-fed mice (D), during fasting (E), and refeeding after a fast (F). EE is normalized to lean mass in the 24 hr trace or analyzed by ANCOVA where body weight was used as a covariate. (G) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) and adipocyte cross-sectional area (CSA) quantification. (H) Histology of gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) and adipocyte CSA quantification. (I) Histology of liver tissues with quantification of area covered by lipid droplets per focal plane. (J) Fasting serum triglyceride, cholesterol, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate (ketone) levels. (K) Fasting blood glucose and insulin levels. (L) Insulin resistance index (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]). (M) Glucose tolerance tests. (N) Insulin tolerance tests. Sample size for all data: euploid (n=8) and TcMAC21 (n=9).

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. ELISA data from euploid and MAC21 mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Circulating levels of adiponectin (A), leptin (B), growth hormone (C), IGF-1 (D), thyroid hormone (T3, E), and thyroxine (T4, F) in chow-fed mice housed at room temperature (22°C). Circulating levels of adiponectin (G), leptin (H), growth hormone (I), IGF-1 (J), T3 (K), and T4 (L) in high-fat diet [HFD]-fed mice housed at 22°C. Circulating levels of growth hormone (M), IGF-1 (N), T3 (O), and T4 (P) in HFD-fed mice housed at thermoneutrality (30°C). Sample size for panel (A–L): euploid (n=8) and TcMAC21 (n=9). Sample size for panels M–P: euploid (n=5) and TcMAC21 (n=4–5).
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Electron micrograph quantification of pancreatic islet and acinar cell zymogen granules.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A) Histology of pancreas and quantification of β-islet cross-sectional area (CSA) in TcMAC21 and euploid mice. (B) Pancreatic insulin and somatostatin (SST) contents (normalized to pancreatic protein input). (C) Electron micrographs (EM) of pancreatic β-cells showing dense insulin granules and their surrounding vesicles, and the quantification of insulin granule CSA, insulin vesicle CSA, and the ratio of insulin granule to insulin vesicle. n=8–10 euploid and 5–8 TcMAC21 chow-fed samples used for pancreatic analysis by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and protein quantification, graphs A and B. n=3 euploid and 3 TcMAC21 fed standard chow were used for EM quantification; each data point represents 1200 insulin granules and 1200 insulin vesicles quantified across six unique locations per mouse, graphs C. (D and E) Representative euploid and TcMAC21 acinar cells. (E) Average zymogen granule CSA quantification. Each data point represents a mouse average comprised of at least 3600 zymogen granules from six unique locations within the pancreas. Analyses were performed on a total of six randomly selected high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice (WT, n=3; KO, n=3).
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Light and dark cycle body temperature of euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

(A) Deep colonic temperature. (B) Interscapular skin temperature. (C) Abdominal skin temperature. (D) Tail skin temperature. Each data point represents the average of 3 days of independent data collection. Sample size: euploid (n=10) and TcMAC21 (n=8).

Differences in body weight were not due to reduced caloric intake, as TcMAC21 mice actually consumed the same or slightly higher amount of food despite being markedly leaner (Figure 2C and Supplementary file 2). Thus, relative to their body weight, TcMAC21 actually consumed a significantly higher amount of food than euploid controls (Figure 2C). Indirect calorimetry analysis indicated that TcMAC21 mice—regardless of the photocycle (light or dark phase) and metabolic states (ad libitum fed, fasting, refeed)—were expending ~25% more energy and were significantly more active compared to euploid controls (Figure 2D–F and Supplementary file 2). It is known that normalization to lean mass can lead to an overestimation of energy expenditure (EE) (Tschöp et al., 2012). For this reason, ANCOVA (using body weight as a covariate of EE) (Tschöp et al., 2012) were also performed. Both types of analyses suggested that TcMAC21 mice had significantly higher EE relative to euploid controls (Figure 2D–F). Despite much higher caloric intake per gram body mass, TcMAC21 mice were much leaner due to substantially elevated physical activity and EE. Hyperactivity and elevated EE were not due to altered circulating thyroid hormones, as serum triiodothyronine (T3, the active form of TH) levels were not different between chow fed TcMAC21 and euploid mice (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Serum level of thyroxine (T4), the precursor of T3, were modestly elevated in TcMAC21 relative to euploid mice.

In accordance with the lean phenotype, TcMAC21 mice had significantly smaller adipocyte cell size in both subcutaneous (inguinal) and visceral (gonadal) fat depots (Figure 2G–H), as well as significantly reduced fat accumulation in liver (Figure 2I). Fasting triglyceride, non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA), and β-hydroxybutyrate levels were not different between genotypes; fasting cholesterol, however, was higher in TcMAC21 mice (Figure 2J). Although fasting insulin levels were not different between groups, fasting blood glucose was significantly lower in TcMAC21 mice (Figure 2K). The insulin resistance index (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]) along with GTT and insulin tolerance test (ITT) suggested modest improvements in insulin sensitivity in TcMAC21 relative to euploid mice (Figure 2L–N). Assessment of the pancreas showed that TcMAC21 mice have similar β-islet cross-sectional area (CSA), insulin and somatostatin (SST) content, and insulin granule and vesicle size compared to euploid controls (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Taken together, these data indicate that chow-fed TcMAC21 mice at baseline are lean despite increased caloric intake, and this is largely due to elevated physical activity and EE.

TcMAC21 mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity and metabolic dysfunction

The hypermetabolic phenotypes seen in chow-fed TcMAC21 predicted that these mice would be resistant to diet-induced obesity and metabolic dysfunction. Indeed, after 8 weeks on high-fat diet (HFD), TcMAC21 mice gained only ~3 g of body weight, whereas the euploid controls gained >15 g of body weight over the same period. Consequently, TcMAC21 mice weighed ~50% less than euploid controls (Figure 3A). Consistent with the lean phenotype, the absolute and relative (normalized to body weight) fat mass were markedly reduced compared to euploid controls (Figure 3B). The weights of other organs (liver, kidney, BAT) at time of termination were also lower in TcMAC21 mice, but tibia length was not different between genotypes (Figure 3—figure supplement 1 and Supplementary file 3). Complete blood count revealed no differences in erythroid, lymphoid, and myeloid cell numbers between genotypes (Supplementary file 4). Because relative lean mass was higher in TcMAC21 compared to euploid mice (Figure 3B), the lean phenotype seen in HFD-fed TcMAC21 is largely due to reduced adiposity. Accordingly, TcMAC21 had significantly smaller adipocyte cell size in both subcutaneous (inguinal) and visceral (gonadal) fat depots, and a marked reduction in lipid accumulation in the liver (Figure 3C–E).

Figure 3. TcMAC21 mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity and metabolic dysfunction.

(A) Body weights over time on a high-fat diet and representative mouse images. (B) Body composition analysis of fat and lean mass. (C) Histology of inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) and quantification of adipocyte cross-sectional area (CSA). (D) Histology of gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) and quantification of adipocyte CSA. (E) Histology of liver tissue and quantification of area covered by lipid droplets per focal plane. (F) Fasting serum triglyceride, cholesterol, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate (ketone) levels. (G) Fasting blood glucose and insulin levels. (H) Insulin resistance index (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]). (I) Glucose tolerance tests (GTTs). (J) Serum insulin levels during GTT. (K) Insulin tolerance tests (ITTs). (L) Blood glucose levels after an overnight (16 hr) fast and 1, 2, and 3 hr of food reintroduction. (M) Serum insulin levels after a 16 hr fast and 2 hr of refeeding. (N) Pancreas histology and quantification of β-islet CSA. (O–P) Pancreatic insulin and somatostatin (SST) contents (normalized to pancreatic protein input). (Q) Electron micrographs (EM) of pancreatic β-cells showing dense insulin granules and their surrounding vesicles, and quantification of insulin granule CSA, insulin vesicle CSA, and the ratio of insulin granule to insulin vesicle. n=8 euploid and 8–9 TcMAC21 mice for all graphs from A to P. n=3 euploid and 3 TcMAC21 used for EM quantification; each data point represents 1200 insulin granules and 1200 insulin vesicles quantified across six unique locations per mouse, graphs Q.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Representative tissue dissection images of euploid and MAC21 mice fed a high-fat diet.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Representative side-by-side dissection images of (A) heart, (B) kidney, (C) spleen, (D) tibia, (E) inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT), (F) gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT), (G) liver, (H) pancreas, (I) brown adipose tissue (BAT), and (J) seminal vesicle. Mice were housed at ambient room temperature (22°C).

Although fasting serum triglyceride, NEFA, and β-hydroxybutyrate levels were not different between genotypes, serum cholesterol was significantly lower in TcMAC21 mice (Figure 3F). Fasting glucose and insulin levels, and the insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), were markedly lower in TcMAC21 mice relative to euploid controls (Figure 3G–H), indicative of enhanced insulin sensitivity. In glucose tolerance tests (GTTs), even though the rate of glucose disposal was similar between TcMAC21 and euploid mice, the amount of serum insulin present during GTT (time 0, 15, and 30 min) was dramatically lower in TcMAC21 (Figure 3I–J). This indicates that a substantially lower amount of insulin is sufficient to promote glucose clearance in TcMAC21 at a rate comparable to euploid mice, consistent with elevated insulin sensitivity in the peripheral tissues. Indeed, when we directly assessed insulin action via ITTs, TcMAC21 mice clearly exhibited higher insulin sensitivity as indicated by the significant differences in insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (Figure 3K).

To independently confirm TcMAC21 mice are more insulin sensitive, we fasted the mice overnight (16 hr) then reintroduced them to food. Under this fasting-refeeding condition, we could clearly see the resumption of food intake was successful at increasing blood glucose in TcMAC21 (Figure 3L); however, the insulin response to food intake in TcMAC21 mice was strikingly smaller in magnitude compared to euploid controls (Figure 3M). Again, these data indicate that TcMAC21 mice are significantly more insulin sensitive since a substantially lower insulin response during fasting-refeeding is sufficient for glucose clearance at a rate comparable to euploid mice.

These results prompted us to determine if there were developmental changes in the pancreas leading to reduced insulin secretion in response to glucose administration or food intake, independent of elevated insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues. Quantification of β-islet size, pancreatic insulin and SST content, as well as insulin granule and vesicle size did not reveal any intrinsic differences between TcMAC21 and euploid mice (Figure 3N–Q), thus ruling out a developmental cause and arguing in favor of enhanced insulin action. Pancreatic acinar zymogen granule size was also not different between genotypes (Figure 2—figure supplement 2), suggesting normal development of the exocrine pancreas. Taken together, these data indicate that TcMAC21 mice are remarkably resistant to HFD-induced obesity and insulin resistance.

Hypermetabolism in TcMAC21 mice fed an HFD

Next, we sought to uncover the physiological mechanisms responsible for TcMAC21 resistance to weight gain and developing insulin resistance when fed an HFD. First, we wanted to rule out whether there is a change in caloric intake. TcMAC21 mice actually consumed the same or slightly higher amount of food as the euploid controls despite markedly lower body weight (Figure 4A and Supplementary file 5). Thus, relative to their body weight, HFD-fed TcMAC21 mice consumed a significantly higher amount of food than the euploid controls (Figure 4A). To rule out any potential dysfunction of the gut that might adversely affect nutrient absorption, we collected, counted, weighed, and subjected fecal samples of each mouse to fecal bomb calorimetry. Neither fecal frequency, average fecal pellet weight, nor fecal energy content was different between TcMAC21 and euploid mice (Figure 4B). Fecal energy content trended lower in TcMAC21 (Figure 4B), implying a modest increase in the efficiency of nutrient absorption. Since energy input (caloric intake per gram body weight) was significantly higher in TcMAC21 and outputs (left-over fecal energy) were similar across genotypes, the data suggest hypermetabolism being a cause of the lean phenotype seen in TcMAC21 mice. Indeed, when we measured EE and physical activity of both groups, we found that TcMAC21 mice have markedly higher EE and physical activity irrespective of circadian cycle and metabolic states (Figure 4D–F and Supplementary file 5). Aware of the potential overestimation of EE when normalized to lean mass, we also included ANCOVA where body weight was used a covariate (Tschöp et al., 2012). Both types of analyses suggested that TcMAC21 mice fed an HFD had significantly higher EE relative to euploid controls (Figure 4D–F). The striking difference in EE was very similar to TcMAC21 fed a standard chow (Figure 2D–F), but to an even greater extent when mice were fed an HFD, presumably due to the greater availability of calorie-dense lipid substrates for oxidation.

Figure 4. Hypermetabolism in TcMAC21 mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD).

Figure 4.

(A) Absolute and relative (normalized to body weight) food intake in mice fed an HFD. (B) Fecal energy content, fecal weight, and fecal frequency of TcMAC21 mice and euploid controls. (C) Serum triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels. (D–F) Energy expenditure (EE) and activity level over 24 hr period in ad libitum HFD-fed mice (D), during fasting (E), and refeeding after a fast (F). EE is normalized to lean mass in the 24 hr trace or analyzed by ANCOVA where body weight was used as a covariate. (G) Deep colonic and tail temperature measured over 3 days in both the light and dark cycle. (H) Representative infrared images of mice. (I) Body weights of euploid, TcMAC21, and weight-matched (WM) control C57BL/6 mice. (J) Interscapular skin temperature of euploid, TcMAC21, and WM control mice. (K) Representative histology of brown adipose tissue (BAT). (L) Quantification of percent total lipid area coverage per focal plane in BAT of euploid and TcMAC21. (M) Expression of mouse genes (by qPCR) known to play major metabolic roles in BAT. Sample size for all data: euploid (n=8) and TcMAC21 (n=9).

Because TcMAC21 mice burned a large excess of energy, we measured the circulating levels of thyroid hormones as they are known to increase metabolic rate and EE (Mullur et al., 2014). Both serum T3 (the active form) and T4 (precursor of T3) levels were significantly higher in TcMAC21 relative to euploid mice (Figure 4C). T3 hormone, however, was not elevated in HFD-fed mice housed at thermoneutrality (30°C) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). If EE was elevated, body temperature of TcMAC21 mice would likely increase. Indeed, deep colon temperatures of TcMAC21 were elevated, most notably in the dark cycle when mice are active (Figure 4G). Assessment with thermal imaging showed an elevated skin temperature around the interscapular region of TcMAC21 mice, whereas the tail skin temperature was not different between groups (Figure 4G–H). Importantly, the differences in interscapular skin temperatures persisted in TcMAC21 even when compared to weight-matched wild-type mice (Figure 4I–J), thus ruling out body weight (and hence surface area/volume ratio) as the cause of greater heat generation to compensate for greater heat loss. Elevated body temperature, however, was not observed in chow-fed mice (Figure 2—figure supplement 3), even though chow-fed TcMAC21 were also hyperactive and had higher EE. Consistent with the thermal imaging data, histological analysis of the interscapular BAT revealed a marked reduction in fat accumulation and a ‘healthy’ brown appearance in TcMAC21 mice when compared to euploid controls (Figure 4K–L), presumably due to excess lipids being utilized. We therefore expected several key metabolic genes in BAT to be upregulated in TcMAC21. Surprisingly, we found minimal differences in key thermogenic and fat oxidation genes between the two groups of mice (Figure 4M, Figure 5—figure supplement 1).

Hypermetabolism of TcMAC21 mice is uncoupled from changes in adipose and liver transcriptomes

The lack of changes observed in key thermogenic and fat oxidation genes mentioned above led us to assume the differences in gene expression must be due to non-canonical and potentially novel pathways. To test this, we conducted an unbiased RNA-sequencing analysis of BAT, liver, gWAT, and iWAT. Again, to our surprise and contrary to expectation, we found the transcriptomes of BAT, liver, gWAT, and iWAT in TcMAC21 to be remarkably similar to euploid controls, with only a limited number of genes whose expression was significantly altered (Figure 5A–D).

Figure 5. Hypermetabolism of TcMAC21 mice is uncoupled from changes in adipose and liver transcriptomes.

(A–D) Differentially expressed mouse genes (DEGs), both protein-coding (PCG) and non-protein-coding genes (NPCG) in brown adipose tissue (BAT), liver, gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT), and inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT). All data is relative to euploid and presented as Log2(FC). The list of genes represents all up- and down-regulated mouse genes (significant by adjusted p-value cut-off) for all four tissues. The red bars indicate upregulated genes and the blue bars indicate downregulated genes. (E) General view and summary of transcriptional changes in BAT, liver, gWAT, and iWAT to highlight the strikingly minimal changes in the mouse transcriptome across the four tissues. There are only a combined total of 114 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across four tissues, with the relative percentage (out of the 114 DEGs) shown for each tissue. Of the 114 DEGs, 105 are protein-coding genes (PCGs; dark yellow bar) and 9 are non-protein-coding genes (NPCGs; light yellow bar). Of the 114 DEGs, 46 are upregulated (red bar) and 68 are downregulated (blue bar). In total, only a combined 0.53% change is noted in the transcriptome of all four tissues (out of the 21,752 RNAs detected). Sample size for RNA-sequencing: euploid (n=5 per tissue) and TcMAC21 (n=5 per tissue).

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Volcano plot of all qPCR results from brown adipose tissue (BAT), skeletal muscle, and white adipose tissue.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Overlaid results of euploid and MAC21 mice across all conditions assayed (chow diet at 22°C, high-fat diet at 22°C, and high-fat diet at 30°C) for (A) BAT, (B) gastrocnemius (skeletal muscle), (C) inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT), (D) gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT), and (E) liver. Significant and/or relevant genes are labeled. Thermoneutral = 30°C housing condition.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Gene expression analysis in brown adipose tissue.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

qPCR analysis of brown adipose tissue genes important for futile cycling, lipid metabolism, mitochondrial function, and thyroid hormone action in euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow and housed at 22°C (A), fed a high-fat diet and housed at 22°C (B), and fed a high-fat diet and housed at thermoneutral 30°C (C).
Figure 5—figure supplement 3. Gene expression analysis in inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT).

Figure 5—figure supplement 3.

qPCR analysis of iWAT genes important for lipid uptake, lipolysis, inflammation, fibrosis, and browning in euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow diet and housed at 22°C (A), fed a high-fat diet and housed at 22°C (B), and fed a high-fat diet and housed at thermoneutral 30°C (C).
Figure 5—figure supplement 4. Gene expression analysis in gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT).

Figure 5—figure supplement 4.

qPCR analysis of gWAT genes important for lipid uptake, fatty acid synthesis, lipolysis, inflammation, and fibrosis in euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow diet and housed at 22°C (A), fed a high-fat diet and housed at 22°C (B), and fed a high-fat diet and housed at thermoneutral 30°C (C).
Figure 5—figure supplement 5. Gene expression analysis in liver.

Figure 5—figure supplement 5.

qPCR analysis of liver genes important for lipid uptake, fatty acid synthesis and oxidation, and triglyceride synthesis in euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow and housed at 22°C (A), fed a high-fat diet and housed at 22°C (B), and fed a high-fat diet and housed at thermoneutral 30°C (C).

There was not a single tissue that had more than 0.3% of its transcriptome (mouse) significantly altered (Figure 5E and Supplementary files 6-9). None of the significant changes in gene expression—small in number—could readily account for the striking differences in phenotypes between TcMAC21 and euploid mice. Corroborating the RNA-sequencing results, quantitative real-time PCR analyses of select metabolic genes in BAT, liver, gWAT, and iWAT also showed minimal changes in TcMAC21 regardless of diet (chow or HFD) and temperature (22°C or 30°C) (Figure 5—figure supplements 15). Together, these data indicate that TcMAC21 mice are hyperactive and hypermetabolic with elevated thermogenesis, but these phenotypes are largely uncoupled from transcriptomic changes in BAT, liver, gWAT, and iWAT.

SLN overexpression in skeletal muscle drives TcMAC21 hypermetabolism

Given the remarkable differences seen in body weight, adiposity, tissue histology and lipid contents, insulin sensitivity, body temperature, physical activity, and metabolic rate between TcMAC21 and euploid mice, we were surprised by how few changes in transcriptomes—both in number and magnitude—were occurring in BAT, liver, and two major white adipose depots. This prompted us to examine the transcriptome of skeletal muscle, by far the largest metabolically active tissue that can substantially contribute to overall EE. RNA-sequencing of TcMAC21 skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) revealed it to be the most transcriptionally dynamic tissue, with 4.2% of the transcriptome changed relative to euploid controls (Figure 6A). Within the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21, there were 432 upregulated genes and 501 downregulated genes (Figure 6—figure supplement 1 and Supplementary file 10). Gene Ontology analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) highlighted upregulated pathways related to thermogenesis, mitochondrial activity, and amino acid metabolism; and downregulated pathways related to TGF-β, insulin, growth hormone, calcium, adrenergic, serine/threonine kinase, and cGMP-PKG signaling pathways (Figure 6B).

Figure 6. Sarcolipin overexpression in skeletal muscle drives TcMAC21 hypermetabolism.

(A) RNA-sequencing analysis reveals changes in TcMAC21 relative to euploid skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius). Volcano plot of skeletal muscle transcriptome (transcripts from the mouse genome only). The lower dotted line denotes significance at the adjusted p-value cut-off (adj. p=0.05). The vertical dotted lines denote a Log2(FC) of –0.5 or 0.5. (B) Gene Ontology analysis of RNA-sequencing results using ClusterProfiler (Yu et al., 2012). (C) Expression of genes (by qPCR) known to be involved in metabolism, fast- or slow-twitch fiber types, futile cycling, thyroid hormone action, and calcium handling in skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius). (D) Graphical representation of Ca2+ cycling through the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Not shown is the store-operated calcium entry pathway involving Ca2+ channels located at the plasma membrane/T-tubule. Ca2+ leaks out of the SR through the ryanodine receptor (RyR1) and is re-sequestered back to the SR by the sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA). SERCA pump uses the energy derived from ATP hydrolysis to translocate Ca2+ from the cytosol back into the SR. When SLN binds to SERCA, it promotes Ca2+ slippage without affecting the ATPase activity of SERCA. By doing so, SLN uncouples Ca2+ transport activity from ATP hydrolysis of SERCA with concomitant heat generation. The increased duration of Ca2+ transients in the cytosol also elevates mitochondrial Ca2+, leading to enhanced mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and heat generation. (E) qPCR analysis of sarcolipin (Sln) expression in euploid and TcMAC21 mice fed a standard chow, high-fat diet (HFD), and HFD while housed at thermoneutrality (30°C). (F) Immunoblot of SLN and GAPDH (loading control) in muscle lysates of euploid, TcMAC21, and SLN overexpressing transgenic mice (Sln-Tg). (G) Immunoblot quantification of SLN using GAPDH as a loading control. The dotted line marks the euploid expression level. (H–I) Gastrocnemius immunofluorescent labeling of SLN-expressing muscle fibers. (J) Muscle fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) quantification from wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-stained gastrocnemius. (K) Immunoblot of OXPHOS complex levels, with GAPDH as a loading control. (L) Quantification of OXPHOS complex levels relative to GAPDH. (M–N) Gastrocnemius immunofluorescent labeling of succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB)-expressing muscle fibers. (O–P) Seahorse respirometry analyses of frozen tissue samples. Shown here are the quadricep group average tracings for oxygen consumption rate (OCR) across the experimental time course. (Q) OCR of TcMAC21 mitochondrial complexes I, II, and IV relative to euploid, for 11 separate tissues (quadricep, Qd; extensor digitorum longus, EDL; gastrocnemius, Gast; plantaris, Plnt; soleus, Sol; tongue, Tng; brown adipose tissue, BAT; liver, Liv; heart, Hrt; inguinal white adipose tissue, iWAT; gonadal white adipose tissue, gWAT) and two dietary conditions (chow and high-fat diet [HFD]). DEGs, differentially expressed genes; PCGs, protein-coding genes; NPCGs, non-protein-coding genes. n=5 euploid and 4 TcMAC21 for RNA-sequencing experiments. n=8–9 euploid and 7–8 TcMAC21 for HFD qPCR. n=7–10 euploid and TcMAC21 for chow qPCR. n=4–5 euploid and TcMAC21 for HFD+thermoneutrality qPCR. n=6 euploid and 7 TcMAC21 for all immunoblots. n=7 euploid and 8 TcMAC21 for gastrocnemius CSA quantification. n=6 euploid and 4 TcMAC21 for all mitochondrial respiration assays; each biological replicate represents the average of three technical replicates.

Figure 6—source data 1. Top left—Original uncropped membrane from imager showing all channels (red/green/blue), with the sarcolipin protein band labeled as SLN appearing blue.
Top right—Original uncropped membrane showing a black and white image of the blue channel only. SLN band is marked with an arrow. The dotted outline represents where the membrane image was cropped for use in Figure 6. Bottom left—Original uncropped membrane from imager showing all channels (red/green/blue), with the GAPDH protein band labeled and appearing blue. Bottom right—Original uncropped membrane showing a black and white image of the blue channel only. GAPDH band is marked with an arrow. The dotted outline represents where the membrane image was cropped for use in Figure 6.
Figure 6—source data 2. Top left—Original uncropped membrane from imager showing all channels (red/green/blue), with the OXPHOS complex protein bands labeled as CI, CII, CIII, CIV, and CV appearing blue.
Top right—Original uncropped membranes of different exposures showing black and white images of the blue channel only. OXHPHOS complex protein bands are labeled. The dotted outline represents where the membrane image was cropped for use in Figure 6. Bottom left—Original uncropped membrane from imager showing all channels (red/green/blue), with the GAPDH protein band labeled and appearing blue. Bottom right—Original uncropped membrane showing a black and white image of the blue channel only. GAPDH band is marked with an arrow. The dotted outline represents where the membrane image was cropped for use in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. The top up- and downregulated genes in skeletal muscle based on RNA-sequencing data.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A) Top 100 upregulated protein-coding genes. (B) Top 100 downregulated protein-coding genes. (C) All upregulated non-protein-coding genes. (D) All downregulated non-protein-coding genes. n=5 euploid and 4 MAC21 for RNA-sequencing experiments. All mice were fed a high-fat diet and housed at ambient room temperature (22°C).
Figure 6—figure supplement 2. Gene expression analysis in skeletal muscle.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2.

qPCR analysis of gastrocnemius skeletal muscle genes important for general metabolism, fast- and slow-twitch fiber types, futile cycling, thyroid hormone action, and calcium handling in euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow diet and housed at 22°C (A), fed a high-fat diet and housed at 22°C (B), and fed a high-fat diet and housed at thermoneutral 30°C (C).
Figure 6—figure supplement 3. Skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) analysis of MAC21 and euploid mice fed a high-fat diet.

Figure 6—figure supplement 3.

(A–B) Representative wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-stained gastrocnemius skeletal muscle samples. (C) Muscle fiber CSA analysis of TcMAC21 mice (n=7) and euploid controls (n=8). Mice were housed at ambient room temperature (22°C).
Figure 6—figure supplement 4. Mitochondrial respirometry analysis of gastrocnemius and quadricep muscle.

Figure 6—figure supplement 4.

(A and C) Average group gastrocnemius (Gastroc) oxygen consumption rate (OCR) traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid (Eu) and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow or high-fat diet (HFD), respectively. (B and D) Average group Gastroc OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of rotenone (Rot) for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (E and G) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for A and C, respectively. (F and H) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for B and D, respectively. (I and K) Average group quadricep (Quad) OCR traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (J and L) Average group Quad OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of Rot for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (M and O) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for I and K, respectively. (N and P) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for J and L, respectively. All mice used for respirometry were housed at ambient room temperature (22°C). AA, antimycin A; TMPD, N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine; Acs, ascorbate; CI, mitochondrial complex I; CII, mitochondrial complex II; CIV, mitochondrial complex IV.
Figure 6—figure supplement 5. Mitochondrial respirometry analysis of soleus and plantaris muscle.

Figure 6—figure supplement 5.

(A and C) Average group soleus oxygen consumption rate (OCR) traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid (Eu) and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow or high-fat diet (HFD), respectively. (B and D) Average group soleus OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of rotenone (Rot) for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (E and G) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for A and C, respectively. (F and H) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for B and D, respectively. (I and K) Average group plantaris OCR traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (J and L) Average group plantaris OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of Rot for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (M and O) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for I and K, respectively. (N and P) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for J and L, respectively. All mice used for respirometry were housed at ambient room temperature (22°C). AA, antimycin A; TMPD, N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine; Acs, ascorbate; CI, mitochondrial complex I; CII, mitochondrial complex II; CIV, mitochondrial complex IV.
Figure 6—figure supplement 6. Mitochondrial respirometry analysis of extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and brown adipose tissue (BAT).

Figure 6—figure supplement 6.

(A and C) Average group EDL oxygen consumption rate (OCR) traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid (Eu) and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow or high-fat diet (HFD), respectively. (B and D) Average group EDL OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of rotenone (Rot) for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (E and G) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for A and C, respectively. (F and H) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for B and D, respectively. (I and K) Average group brown adipose tissue (BAT) OCR traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (J and L) Average group BAT OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of Rot for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (M and O) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for I and K, respectively. (N and P) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for J and L, respectively. All mice used for respirometry were housed at ambient room temperature (22°C). AA, antimycin A; TMPD, N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine; Acs, ascorbate; CI, mitochondrial complex I; CII, mitochondrial complex II; CIV, mitochondrial complex IV.
Figure 6—figure supplement 7. Mitochondrial respirometry analysis of liver and tongue.

Figure 6—figure supplement 7.

(A and C) Average group liver oxygen consumption rate (OCR) traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid (Eu) and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow or high-fat diet (HFD), respectively. (B and D) Average group liver OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of rotenone (Rot) for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (E and G) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for A and C, respectively. (F and H) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for B and D, respectively. (I and K) Average group tongue OCR traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (J and L) Average group tongue OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of Rot for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (M and O) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for I and K, respectively. (N and P) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for J and L, respectively. All mice used for respirometry were housed at ambient room temperature (22°C). AA, antimycin A; TMPD, N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine; Acs, ascorbate; CI, mitochondrial complex I; CII, mitochondrial complex II; CIV, mitochondrial complex IV.
Figure 6—figure supplement 8. Mitochondrial respirometry analysis of heart.

Figure 6—figure supplement 8.

(A and C) Average group heart oxygen consumption rate (OCR) traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid (Eu) and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow or high-fat diet (HFD), respectively. (B and D) Average group heart OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of rotenone (Rot) for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (E and G) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for A and C, respectively. (F and H) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for B and D, respectively. All mice used for respirometry were housed at ambient room temperature (22°C). AA, antimycin A; TMPD, N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine; Acs, ascorbate; CI, mitochondrial complex I; CII, mitochondrial complex II; CIV, mitochondrial complex IV.
Figure 6—figure supplement 9. Mitochondrial respirometry analysis of inguinal (iWAT) and gonadal (gWAT) white adipose tissue.

Figure 6—figure supplement 9.

(A and C) Average group iWAT oxygen consumption rate (OCR) traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid (Eu) and MAC21 male mice fed a standard chow or high-fat diet (HFD), respectively. (B and D) Average group liver OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of rotenone (Rot) for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (E and G) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for A and C, respectively. (F and H) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for B and D, respectively. (I and K) Average group gWAT OCR traces using NADH as a substrate for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (J and L) Average group gWAT OCR traces using succinate as a substrate in the presence of Rot for euploid and MAC21 mice fed a standard chow or HFD, respectively. (M and O) Mitochondrial complex I and IV OCR quantification for I and K, respectively. (N and P) Mitochondrial complex II and IV OCR quantification for J and L, respectively. All mice used for respirometry were housed at ambient room temperature (22°C). AA, antimycin A; TMPD, N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine; Acs, ascorbate; CI, mitochondrial complex I; CII, mitochondrial complex II; CIV, mitochondrial complex IV.

To further confirm the RNA-sequencing results, we performed qPCR on a number of key genes related to skeletal muscle metabolism, fast- and slow-twitch fiber types, futile cycling, thyroid hormone action, and general calcium handling (Figure 6C and Figure 6—figure supplement 2). While a few of the genes were significantly different in expression, the most notable upregulated gene with the biggest magnitude of change was Sln (Figure 6C), encoding the 31 amino acid single-pass membrane protein, SLN. SLN is a regulator and an uncoupler of the sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA) (Bal and Periasamy, 2020; Wang et al., 2021). Under normal circumstances in a resting muscle fiber, Ca2+ cycling through the sarcoplasmic reticulum involves Ca2+ leak through the ryanodine receptor (RYR) and its re-sequestration back to SR by the SERCA pump (Barclay and Launikonis, 2022; Macdonald and Stephenson, 2001; Figure 6D). Resting cytosolic Ca2+ is further controlled by the store-operated calcium entry mechanism localized at the plasma membrane/T-tubule (Pearce et al., 2022). SERCA uses the energy derived from ATP hydrolysis to transport calcium from the cytosol back into the SR (Toyoshima and Inesi, 2004). When SLN binds to SERCA, it promotes Ca2+ slippage without affecting the ATPase activity of the pump; therefore, more ATP needs to be consumed by the SERCA pump to re-sequester Ca2+ back into SR in the presence of SLN. Effectively, SLN uncouples ATP hydrolysis from calcium transport into the SR (Smith et al., 2002; Sahoo et al., 2013). This results in futile SERCA pump activity, ATP hydrolysis, and heat generation (Wang et al., 2021; Bal et al., 2012; Mall et al., 2006). In addition, in the context of excitation-contraction coupling, increased duration of cytosolic calcium transients due to uncoupling of the SERCA pump can transiently elevate mitochondrial Ca2+ and activates mitochondrial respiration and heat generation (Barclay and Launikonis, 2021; Yi et al., 2011), as well as calcium-dependent signaling that enhances oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle (Maurya et al., 2018; Maurya et al., 2015; Figure 6D).

Interestingly, regardless of diet (chow or HFD) and temperature (22°C or 30°C), TcMAC21 mice consistently had ~20- to 30-fold upregulated Sln expression (Figure 6E). The expression of other calcium handling genes—phospholamban (Pln), calmodulin (Calm2), SERCA1a (Atp2a1), SERCA2a (Atp2a2)—were not significantly different between TcMAC21 and euploid mice. Likewise, overexpressing SLN in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice also did not alter SERCA expression (Sopariwala et al., 2015). The Sln gene is known to be upregulated in skeletal muscle by cold exposure (Pant et al., 2015; Rowland et al., 2015a; Bal et al., 2016). In contrast, the markedly upregulated Sln expression seen in TcMAC21 mice housed at ambient temperature (22°C) remained high even when the animals were housed at thermoneutrality (30°C). Consistent with the mRNA data, SLN protein levels were also strikingly upregulated in TcMAC21 skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) (Figure 6F–G). Immunofluorescence also indicated substantially more SLN positive muscle fibers in TcMAC21 mice (Figure 6H–I). We included skeletal muscle lysate from SLN overexpression transgenic mouse (Maurya et al., 2015) as our positive control. While the transgenic mouse had ~2.5-fold higher level of SLN compared to controls, the SLN protein levels in TcMAC21 were ~4.5-fold higher than the euploid mice (Figure 6G). It is known that Sln can be induced in skeletal muscle as a compensatory response to muscle atrophy, dystrophy, and injury (Chambers et al., 2022). However, none of the genes involved in muscle repair, wasting, and atrophy were significantly upregulated (Supplementary file 11), suggesting that Sln overexpression is not due to structural or functional deficit of the skeletal muscle in TcMAC21 mice. Collectively, our data suggest that a mechanism exists that can achieve upregulation of endogenous mouse SLN at a level substantially higher than that seen in artificially overexpressed transgenic mice under non-pathological condition.

Quantification of histological sections revealed that the average gastrocnemius muscle fiber CSA in TcMAC21 was significantly smaller compared to euploid mice (Figure 6J and Figure 6—figure supplement 3). This suggests a shift from being a predominantly glycolytic muscle to a more oxidative muscle, as a smaller muscle fiber CSA is associated with a more oxidative muscle phenotype (van Wessel et al., 2010). In accordance, protein levels of mitochondrial complexes I–V were significantly higher in TcMAC21 gastrocnemius muscle compared to euploid controls (Figure 6K–L). Corroborating the Western blot data, immunofluorescence also showed substantially higher succinate dehydrogenase (SDHB) staining (marker of oxidative capacity) in gastrocnemius muscle of TcMAC21 mice (Figure 6M–N).

To determine if TcMAC21 mice have higher mitochondrial activity compared to euploid controls, we conducted mitochondrial respiration analyses in liver, BAT, iWAT, gWAT, and different muscle types (quadriceps, extensor digitorum longus, gastrocnemius, plantaris, soleus, tongue, and heart). Except soleus and heart, most muscle types from TcMAC21 fed either chow or HFD—regardless of whether they were predominantly slow-twitch (oxidative), fast-twitch (glycolytic), or mixed—showed significantly elevated oxygen consumption due to elevated mitochondrial respiration (Figure 6O–Q and Figure 6—figure supplements 49). Enhanced mitochondrial complex I, II, and IV activities were more pronounced in glycolytic muscle tissues, suggesting that these normally glycolytic muscle fibers may assume a more oxidative phenotype in TcMAC21 mice. The greater oxidative phenotype in glycolytic muscle tissues was not due to changes in fiber-type composition, as none of the fiber type-specific transcripts were different between genotypes (Figure 6C). These data are consistent with similar results reported for skeletal muscle-specific SLN overexpression mice (Maurya et al., 2018; Maurya et al., 2015; Sopariwala et al., 2015).

In contrast to muscle, mitochondrial activities of complexes I and II in interscapular BAT was largely unchanged in TcMAC21 (Figure 6Q and Figure 6—figure supplement 6), despite the pronounced differences in BAT histology and lipid content between TcMAC21 and euploid mice (Figure 4K–L). In chow-fed mice, however, mitochondrial complex IV activity was higher in BAT of TcMAC21. In subcutaneous (inguinal) white adipose tissue, mitochondrial respiration was significantly reduced in chow-fed TcMAC21 mice but unchanged in HFD-fed mice (Figure 6—figure supplement 9). In visceral (gonadal) white adipose tissue, mitochondrial respiration was also largely unchanged in either chow- or HFD-fed TcMAC21 mice (Figure 6—figure supplement 9). Unexpectedly and in striking contrast to muscle and BAT, mitochondrial complex I, II, and IV activity was markedly reduced in the liver and heart of both chow- and HFD-fed TcMAC21 compared to euploid mice (Figure 6Q and Figure 6—figure supplements 78), despite the liver of TcMAC21 mice being significantly ‘healthier’ with much reduced lipid accumulation (Figures 2I and 3E).

All together, these data suggest that SLN-mediated futile SERCA activity in skeletal muscle is a potential driver underlying the hypermetabolism phenotypes seen in TcMAC21 mice. Because the futile SERCA pump activity consumes more ATP to transport Ca2+ into SR due to Ca2+ slippage (Wang et al., 2021; Smith et al., 2002; Sahoo et al., 2013; Mall et al., 2006; Sahoo et al., 2015), this creates a huge energy demand and markedly drives up the activity of mitochondrial respiration to supply the ATP needed for the SERCA pump. Presumably, this effect results in systemic channeling of metabolic substrates (e.g. lipids) into skeletal muscle to fuel the elevated mitochondrial respiration rate. This in turn leads to secondary improvements and protection—reduced fat accumulation and smaller adipocytes—we observed in liver, BAT, gWAT, and iWAT despite minimal changes in the transcriptomes of these tissues.

Potential regulators of SLN expression in skeletal muscle

Having established that SLN-mediated futile SERCA activity underlies hypermetabolism in TcMAC21 mice, we next asked what regulator(s) promote the upregulation of endogenous SLN, as little is known about what controls its expression in skeletal muscle. We took advantage of the observation that SLN overexpression appears to be locked in the ‘on’ position in skeletal muscle and could not be downregulated to control levels at thermoneutrality (Figure 6E). Thyroid hormone (T3) is likely not the driver of SLN overexpression since serum T3 was not different between TcMAC21 and euploid housed at thermoneutrality (Figure 2—figure supplement 1); in addition, SLN was shown to be upregulated in hypothyroid mice compared to euthyroid controls (Kaspari et al., 2020). When housed at thermoneutrality (30°C), TcMAC21 mice consumed a similar amount of calories as the euploid controls but maintained their lean phenotypes with lower fasting insulin levels (Figure 7A–E). When normalized to lean mass, TcMAC21 mice appeared to have higher EE in the dark cycle (Figure 7F and Supplementary file 12). However, when body weight was used as a covariate in ANCOVA, the higher EE seen in TcMAC21 was short of significance (p=0.0693), and this could be due to the small sample size (Figure 7G). Consistent with lower adiposity, TcMAC21 mice housed at thermoneutrality had smaller adipocyte cell size and lower lipid contents in BAT and liver (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Tissue collection at termination of the study also showed significantly smaller fat mass and reduced BAT and liver weight in TcMAC21 mice (Supplementary file 13).

Figure 7. Increased energy expenditure (EE) persists in TcMAC21 mice housed at thermoneutrality.

(A) Body weights of TcMAC21 mice and euploid controls housed at thermoneutrality (30°C) for 8 weeks. (B) Body composition analysis of absolute and relative (normalized to body weight) fat and lean mass. (C) Fasting insulin levels. (D–E) Absolute and relative (normalized to body weight) food intake. (F) EE in the dark and light cycles. *p<0.05 (two-way ANOVA). (G) EE as analyzed by ANCOVA where body weight was used as a covariate. Sample size for all data: euploid (n=5) and TcMAC21 (n=4–5).

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Histology of high-fat diet (HFD)-fed euploid and MAC21 mice housed at thermoneutrality (30°C).

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT, A–B), gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT, D and E), brown adipose tissue (BAT, H and I), liver (J and K), and pancreas (M and N). (C) Average iWAT adipocyte cross-sectional area (CSA) quantification. (F) Average gWAT adipocyte CSA quantification. (I) Average BAT area covered by lipid droplets per focal plane. (L) Average liver area covered by lipid droplets per focal plane. (O) Average pancreas β-islet CSA quantification. Sample size: euploid (n=5) and TcMAC21 (n=4).

From these data we surmised that the regulator(s) of SLN would likewise remain unchanged (i.e. continued to be up- or down-regulated) at thermoneutrality. We therefore performed RNA-sequencing on skeletal muscle isolated from HFD-fed TcMAC21 housed at thermoneutrality. RNA-sequencing data showed a total of 113 DEGs in the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21 mice, with 59 being upregulated and 54 being downregulated (Figure 8A and Supplementary file 14). Of the 59 upregulated genes, 56 were PCGs and 3 were NPCGs; the downregulated group had 51 PCGs and 3 NPCGs. Next, we compared the skeletal muscle transcriptomes of euploid vs TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C with the transcriptomes of euploid vs TcMAC21 mice housed at 30°C. This tells us which genes are differentially expressed by TcMAC21 mice relative to euploid controls at both temperatures. There were 848 genes differentially expressed by only TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C. This includes 392 upregulated (299 PCGs and 93 NPCGs) and 456 downregulated (386 PCGs and 70 NPCGs) genes (Figure 8B). There were 31 genes differentially expressed by only TcMAC21 mice housed at 30°C, with 22 upregulated (19 PCGs and 3 NPCGs) and 9 downregulated (7 PCGs and 2 NPCGs) genes. Notably, there were 81 genes differentially expressed by TcMAC21 at both temperatures, with 37 upregulated (all PCGs) and 44 downregulated (43 PCGs and 1 NPCG) genes.

Figure 8. Potential regulators of sarcolipin expression in skeletal muscle.

Figure 8.

(A) Volcano plot of skeletal muscle transcriptome (transcripts from the mouse genome only). The lower dotted line denotes significance at the p-value cut-off (p=0.05), and the upper dotted line denotes significance at the adjusted p-value cut-off (adj. p=0.05). The vertical dotted lines denote a Log2(fold change [FC]) of –0.5 or 0.5. Flanking the volcano plot are the top down- and upregulated mouse genes. (B) Comparison of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) shared and not shared by TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C vs. 30°C. Heat map showing all significantly up- or downregulated shared genes. (C) Direct comparison of TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C and 30°C for most stably expressed mouse genes. Data filtered first by genes with Log2(FC) within ±0.5 (least change), then by lowest significance, and finally compared to the shared DEGs found in B. Table shows DEGs with least variation in expression at 22°C and 30°C. (D) Overlap analysis of Hsa21-derived human transcripts expressed in TcMAC21 mice (skeletal muscle) housed at 22°C and 30°C. (E) Graph showing the most stably expressed Hsa21-derived human genes in the TcMAC21 gastrocnemius. Top axis refers to the difference in Log2(FC) between human genes in TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C and 30°C (data represented as black dots). Bottom axis shows the Log2(FC) value of a particular gene at 22°C and 30°C (data represented as a light blue-green or light red dot, respectively). The gene list shows all the human genes expressed by both groups with the least amount of change in expression between the two temperatures.

To further narrow our candidate Sln regulators, we directly compared the expression of mouse genes in the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C and 30°C. Because Sln expression was similarly upregulated in the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C and 30°C, we presumed the regulator(s) of Sln would also display minimal variation across both temperatures. We therefore focused on genes that remained unchanged at 22°C and 30°C in TcMAC21 skeletal muscle. We first filtered out all genes above or below Log2(FC) of 0.5 or –0.5, which left us with 3754 transcripts whose expression remained relatively unchanged at both temperatures. We next sorted the data by p-value, then compared the entire list of unchanged transcripts to the list of shared DEGs shown in Figure 8B, and found that only five genes were present in both (Figure 8C). This list contains one upregulated gene (A930018M24Rik) and four downregulated PCGs (Csde1, Kmt5a, Vasp, and Calm1). Again, these are the genes that are differentially expressed by TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C and 30°C as compared to euploid, which remain unchanged in TcMAC21 mice across temperature. Thus, these are potential Sln regulators that are encoded in the mouse genome.

Alternatively, the regulator(s) of Sln expression could be one or more Hsa21-drived human genes. There was a total of 106 human transcripts expressed by TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C and 30°C, with 94 PCGs and 12 NPCGs (Figure 8D). There were four human PCGs only expressed in TcMAC21 mice housed at 30°C and 83 human genes whose expression was turned off at 30°C. Interestingly, a majority (75 out of 83) of the human genes that were turned off at 30°C are NPCGs. The human genes that we postulated as most likely to regulate Sln expression would be those that change the least at 22°C and 30°C. We first calculated the difference in Log2(FC) values of all human genes expressed at 22°C and 30°C in TcMAC21 skeletal muscle (i.e. Log2(FC at 22°C) - Log2(FC at 30°C)). Those values closest to zero represent genes with the most consistent expression across both housing temperatures. Genes with a negative Log2(FC) difference are expressed at higher levels at 30°C, and genes with a positive Log2(FC) difference are expressed at higher levels at 22°C. The ~20 genes with the closest-to-zero Log2(FC) difference are listed in yellow (Figure 8E), and these would be considered potential regulators of Sln derived from Hsa21. Altogether, our analysis has yielded a defined number of potential Sln regulators, from the mouse or human genome, that can be experimentally tested (either singly or in combination) in follow-up studies.

Discussion

While assessing the systemic metabolic impact of cross-species aneuploidy (a human chromosome in mice), we made several striking and unexpected discoveries. Given that TcMAC21 mice recapitulate multiple features of human trisomy 21—most notably structural and functional neurological deficits and craniofacial skeletal alterations (Kazuki et al., 2020) and also a small body size compared to their euploid littermates—we initially expected the animals to show metabolic changes such as obesity and glucose intolerance reminiscent of the DS population (Bertapelli et al., 2016) or the metabolic dysregulation (e.g. insulin resistance and dyslipidemia) seen in the Ts65Dn DS mouse model (Sarver et al., 2023). Instead, the TcMAC21 mice have several hallmarks of hypermetabolism. They are lean despite greater caloric intake, and have markedly elevated oxidative metabolic rate as indicated by increased VO2, EE, mitochondrial respiration in skeletal muscle, and by a shift to a more oxidative phenotype in skeletal muscle.

Although the higher prevalence of obesity and diabetes is well documented in the DS population (Bertapelli et al., 2016), the mechanism of how gene dosage imbalance causes metabolic dysregulation in vivo is largely unknown and limited to only a few studies (Dierssen et al., 2020; Fructuoso et al., 2018). Until our recent study (Sarver et al., 2023), the scope of the previous metabolic studies using DS mouse models was limited. Our present study represents one of the most comprehensive metabolic analyses carried out in DS mouse models to date. To our surprise, TcMAC21 phenotypes appear to be the opposite of what is seen in DS. We can speculate on possible reasons for this: (1) The strong physiological effects of SLN overexpression in the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21 override and mask potential deleterious effects of high-fat feeding seen in the euploid controls. It is important to note that SLN overexpression is not seen in other commonly used DS mouse models such as the Ts65Dn (Sarver et al., 2023). Although candidate transcriptional drivers of Sln overexpression have been identified (Figure 8), it remains to be determined which among these are responsible for Sln overexpression in the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21 mice. (2) The unexpected phenotypes of TcMAC21, including SLN overexpression, could be the result of complex interactions between human genes and the mouse genome that we do not fully understand. The human Chr21 also contains a significant number of non-coding human genes (>400) with uncertain effects on the mouse transcriptome. Further, the human proteins may alter the stoichiometric compositions of multi-protein complexes in an unpredictable way. For this reason, and for comparison, it is imperative to carry out similar comprehensive metabolic studies in other established DS mouse models (e.g. Dp(16)1Yey/+ and Ts66Yah) where all the trisomic genes are derived from the mouse instead of human, and also without extra trisomic genes not found in Hsa21 (Li et al., 2007; Duchon et al., 2022). It is possible the trisomic mouse orthologs of Hsa21 genes are overexpressed and interact with the rest of the mouse genome in a manner that more closely reflects what might be seen in the adipose tissue, liver, and skeletal muscle of DS. This is an important issue to resolve in terms of selecting appropriate DS mouse models to best reflect the metabolic phenotypes seen in DS. While TcMAC21 is considered the best genetic model for DS in mice, the mouse apparently has a means of overcoming the negative metabolic impact of trisomy. Uncovering this mechanism could be important for the treatment or prevention of obesity and diabetes.

What could be the mechanism underlying the striking metabolic phenotypes of TcMAC21? One potential driver of hypermetabolism appears to be SLN overexpression in the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21 mice, leading to persistent uncoupling of the SERCA pumps, heat generation, and energy dissipation. This mechanism could explain multiple unexpected observations: despite a marked reduction in lipid accumulation in the liver, BAT, and WAT, surprisingly few changes were seen in the transcriptomes of these tissues, and none could account for the striking tissue histology. Importantly, none of the key genes (e.g. Ucp1 in BAT and browning/beiging genes in iWAT) involved in thermogenesis and lipid metabolism were significantly different between TcMAC21 and euploid mice, and yet the mice had elevated deep colon temperature. While the metabolic activity (i.e. mitochondrial respiration) of BAT was largely unchanged, complex I, II, and IV activities in the liver were surprisingly downregulated. Mitochondrial respiration was either downregulated or unchanged in iWAT and gWAT. All these striking phenotypes could be explained by metabolic substrates (e.g. lipid) channeling away from liver, BAT, and WAT, and into skeletal muscle to fuel elevated mitochondrial respiration, as this was needed to meet the high ATP demand created by futile SERCA pump activity.

We largely ruled out the involvement of thyroid hormones in promoting hypermetabolism in TcMAC21 mice. Under the basal state when mice were fed a standard chow, or HFD-fed mice housed at thermoneutrality, circulating T3 levels were not different between groups despite the hyperactivity and hypermetabolism of TcMAC21 mice. Although serum T3 levels were elevated in HFD-fed TcMAC21 housed at room temperature (RT) (22°C), the predicted T3 effects were largely absent. It is known that T3 negatively regulates the expression of SLN, as hypothyroidic mice have significantly upregulated SLN mRNA and protein in skeletal muscle compared to euthyroid mice (Kaspari et al., 2020). Instead of the expected downregulation, SLN expression was dramatically elevated in the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21 mice. Through its nuclear hormone receptor, T3 regulates many metabolic genes in adipose tissue, liver, and skeletal muscle (Mullur et al., 2014), and yet none of the well-known T3-regulated genes were upregulated in these tissues despite elevated T3 levels. In addition, T3 is a potent inducer of Ucp1 expression in BAT (Yau et al., 2019) and white adipose tissue beiging (Johann et al., 2019), but Ucp1 transcript levels were not upregulated in BAT or the white adipose tissue of TcMAC21 mice. This apparent T3 resistance in HFD-fed TcMAC21 mice is likely a compensatory response to an already elevated body temperature and the hypermetabolism induced by SLN-mediated futile SERCA activity and heat generation in skeletal muscle. If T3 further increased the metabolic rate of TcMAC21 mice, this would likely overtax the heat dissipation mechanism leading to hyperthermia and possible death.

By collapsing the proton motive force within the intermembrane space of mitochondria, UCP1-mediated mitochondrial uncoupling in BAT could raise body temperature and enhance EE (Chouchani et al., 2019). Although thermal imaging highlighted increased skin temperature around the interscapular BAT region of TcMAC21 mice, the thermal signal could be produced by local muscle around the interscapular area. Our gene expression, BAT transcriptomics, and functional data, however, do not support UCP1-mediated uncoupling in BAT as a probable mechanism for the hypermetabolism and elevated thermogenesis seen in TcMAC21 mice. Neither the expression of Ucp1 nor mitochondrial activity was consistently elevated in the BAT of TcMAC21 mice fed chow or HFD. Housing mice at a thermoneutral temperature would suppress BAT activity and beiging in iWAT (Gonzalez-Hurtado et al., 2018), yet TcMAC21 mice housed at thermoneutrality for an extended period (>2 months) retained elevated EE and lean body weight comparable to TcMAC21 mice housed at 22°C. Together, these data argue against BAT being a significant contributor to the thermogenesis seen in TcMAC21 mice.

Recent studies have also shown that creatine-driven futile substrate cycling and SERCA2b-mediated calcium cycling in beige fat can promote EE and thermogenesis (Kazak et al., 2015; Ikeda et al., 2017). Regardless of housing temperatures, none of the genes involved in creatine/phosphocreatine futile cycle (e.g. Slc6a8, Gatm, Gamt, Ckmt1, Ckmt2) or the SERCA2b-RyR2 pathway (Atp2a2, Ryr2) were upregulated in iWAT, suggesting that these pathways are likely not involved in the hypermetabolic phenotypes of TcMAC21. Promoting metabolic inefficiency in skeletal muscle by UCP1 or UCP3 overexpression can increase metabolic rate and prevent diet-induced obesity (Clapham et al., 2000; Son et al., 2004; Li et al., 2000). In the skeletal muscle of TcMAC21 mice, Ucp1 and Ucp3 transcripts were not upregulated, suggesting that mitochondrial uncoupling by UCP1 or UCP3 is also unlikely to contribute to the observed lean and hypermetabolic phenotypes.

SLN plays a role in modulating body weight by promoting EE through its effects on the SERCA pump (Bal et al., 2012; Maurya et al., 2015; Bombardier et al., 2013; MacPherson et al., 2016). Binding of SLN to SERCA does not interfere with ATP hydrolysis of the pump, but reduces calcium transport into the SR lumen through a calcium ‘slippage’ mechanism (Wang et al., 2021; Sahoo et al., 2013; Mall et al., 2006; Sahoo et al., 2015). Thus, SLN promotes futile cycling of the SERCA pumps, ATP hydrolysis, and heat generation. Consistent with this model, mice lacking SLN are cold intolerant and gain more weight on an HFD due to reduced EE (Bal et al., 2012; Bombardier et al., 2013; MacPherson et al., 2016); conversely, transgenic overexpression of SLN in skeletal muscle promotes a lean phenotype (Maurya et al., 2015).

Under normal situations, SLN is mainly expressed in slow-twitch oxidative muscle tissues such as the soleus and diaphragm, with little expression in fast-twitch glycolytic muscle tissues such as the gastrocnemius and quadriceps (Babu et al., 2007). In the case of hypothyroid mice, endogenous SLN is only markedly upregulated in oxidative muscle fibers (soleus and diaphragm) but not the large glycolytic muscle tissues (Kaspari et al., 2020). It has been argued that in rodents the futile SERCA activity and EE occurring in soleus and diaphragm (both are small in size) is quantitatively insufficient to effect significant changes in body weight (Campbell and Dicke, 2018). Notwithstanding the artificial overexpression of SLN in both fast-twitch glycolytic and slow-twitch oxidative muscle fibers (Maurya et al., 2015), it is unclear whether endogenous SLN can be substantially induced in large glycolytic muscle tissues such as the gastrocnemius and quadriceps under non-pathological conditions. Our data helps to resolve this issue. In TcMAC21 mice, endogenous SLN is markedly upregulated in a largely glycolytic muscle (gastrocnemius), suggesting that a mechanism indeed exists that can substantially elevate SLN transcript and protein in muscle fiber types that normally have low expression. Corroborating this is the observation that mitochondrial respiration is significantly elevated in most muscle types—gastrocnemius (fast-twitch), quadriceps (fast-twitch), plantaris (mixed), and extensor digitorum longus (mixed).

The huge ATP demand created by the futile SERCA pump activity appears to be the cause of upregulated protein expression of complexes I-IV, elevated mitochondrial respiration, and the assumption of an oxidative phenotype in muscle tissues that are normally glycolytic. This could also reflect skeletal muscle adaptation to increased physical activity level seen in TcMAC21 mice. This reprogramming of glycolytic muscle tissues into an oxidative phenotype is likely due to increased duration of calcium transients (Baylor and Hollingworth, 2003), leading to calcium-dependent activation of mitochondrial respiration and calcium-dependent signaling that drives increased production of OXPHOS proteins (Maurya et al., 2018; Maurya et al., 2015; Robb-Gaspers et al., 1998; Jouaville et al., 1999; Tarasov et al., 2012; Glancy et al., 2013). Since skeletal muscle makes up ~40% of the body’s weight and is a major energy consuming tissue (Rolfe and Brown, 1997; Zurlo et al., 1990), elevated EE due to a combination of hyperactivity and futile SERCA pump activity—especially the big muscles (gastrocnemius and quadriceps)—will have substantial impact on total energy balance and body weight. As an added benefit, increased fuel consumption for non-shivering thermogenesis driven by the futile SERCA pump would channel lipid substrates into skeletal muscle for oxidation and prevent excess lipid accumulation in liver, BAT, and white adipose tissue, thus conferring an overall healthy metabolic profile with preserved systemic insulin sensitivity.

We do not know the relative contribution of hyperactivity and futile SERCA activity to the overall lean phenotype of the TcMAC21 mice. Future studies using a TcMAC21 mouse model specifically lacking SLN will help answer the important question of whether SLN indeed plays a causal role in promoting the lean phenotype we observed in TcMAC21 mice. Although TcMAC21 mice have increased voluntary physical activity, which can elevate metabolism, our data suggest that futile SERCA activity in skeletal muscle could be another potential driver of the hypermetabolic phenotype. Overexpression of SLN in skeletal muscle does not significantly alter voluntary physical activity at ambient RT or at thermoneutrality, yet the SLN transgenic mice consistently gained significantly less weight in response to high-fat feeding (Maurya et al., 2015; Bombardier et al., 2013). Further, SLN appears to be required for effective adiposity reduction in HFD-fed mice with access to a running wheel (Gamu et al., 2015). Elevated locomotor activity in TcMAC21 mice, however, would likely amplify the effect of SLN-mediated uncoupling of the SERCA pumps, as muscle movement results in greater SR Ca2+ cycling. In cultured myotubes, caffeine-induced release of Ca2+ from the SR via the ryanodine receptor/channel (RYR1) would only activate calcium-dependent signaling in the presence, but not absence, of SLN; conversely, inhibiting Ca2+ release through RYR1 using dantrolene blocks calcium-dependent signaling only in SLN-expressing, but not SLN-deficient, myotubes (Maurya et al., 2018). Thus, increased SR Ca2+ cycling due to elevated physical activity would promote EE and also create a favorable cellular context to amplify the effects of SLN overexpression on uncoupling of the SERCA pumps. Accordingly, EE and the degree of leanness seen in TcMAC21 mice are significantly greater in magnitude than the SLN transgenic mice.

To fully harness SLN-mediated futile SERCA activity for energy dissipation and weight loss requires an understanding of how endogenous SLN expression is regulated, but the mechanism of which remains largely unknown. TcMAC21 mice offer critical insights into the switches that control SLN expression in skeletal muscle. Regardless of temperatures (ambient or thermoneutral), elevated Sln expression in TcMAC21 appeared to be in the ‘on’ position and could not be turned off. We exploited this information to zoom in on a defined set of mouse and Hsa21-derived transcripts—some of which are transcription factors (e.g. PKNOX1, ETS2), RNA binding proteins (e.g. Csde1), and epigenetic regulators (e.g. Kmt5a)—that remain significantly up- or down-regulated in skeletal muscle at both 22°C and 30°C, and show <1% variability across the two temperatures. We presume that one or more of these genes could potentially be the sought after ‘switches’ of Sln expression. Additional studies are needed to identify such critical on/off switches. A recent study has suggested that the C-terminal cleavage fragment of TUG can upregulate Sln expression in the skeletal muscle when it enters the nucleus and forms a complex with PPAR-γ and PGC-1α (Habtemichael et al., 2021). However, this pathway is largely abrogated in mice fed an HFD; thus, we think this transcriptional mechanism is likely not involved in upregulating Sln expression in TcMAC21 mice fed an HFD.

Weight loss can be achieved by reducing caloric intake or promoting EE, and the latter can be physiologically accomplished by increasing physical activity (e.g. exercise) or through shivering and non-shivering thermogenesis (Chouchani et al., 2019; Roesler and Kazak, 2020). SLN-mediated non-shivering thermogenesis offers an attractive approach for promoting EE and weight loss: Expression of SLN is largely restricted to the striated muscle of all mammals, including humans (Paran et al., 2015; Rowland et al., 2015b; Vangheluwe et al., 2005; Fajardo et al., 2013). Compared to BAT (~1.5% of body weight in young men) (Leitner et al., 2017), the total mass of skeletal muscle (~40% of body weight) makes futile SERCA activity in this large tissue especially effective in energy dissipation (Smith et al., 2013). Importantly, overexpression of SLN in skeletal muscle does not appear to have adverse effects; rather, SLN transgenic mice have higher endurance capacity and improved muscle performance due to enhanced oxidative capacity (Sopariwala et al., 2015). In summary, our work provides further proof-of-concept that endogenous SLN-mediated uncoupling of SERCA pumps to enhance EE can potentially be harnessed for systemic metabolic health.

Materials and methods

Mouse model

The transchromosomic TcMAC21 (simply referred to as MAC21) mice carrying a near-complete human chromosome 21 were generated and genotyped as previously described (Kazuki et al., 2020). Because MAC21 male mice are infertile, all the female mice were used for breeding. Hence, metabolic analyses were conducted on male mice only. MAC21 mice were initially maintained on an outbred background (ICR strain mice). After crossing for eight generations onto BDF1 (C57BL/6J (B6) × DBA/2J (D2)), MAC21 were transferred to the Riken Animal Resource (BRC No. RBRC05796 and STOCK Tc (HSA21q-MAC1)). Characterizations of MAC21 were performed on mice (75% B6/25% D2 on average) produced by crossing B6 males with trisomic B6D2 females (Kazuki et al., 2020). Euploid littermates were used as controls throughout the studies.

Mice were fed a standard chow (Envigo; 2018SX) or HFD (60% kcal derived from fat, #D12492, Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA). Mice were housed in polycarbonate cages on a 12 hr:12 hr light-dark photocycle with ad libitum access to water and food. HFD was provided for 16 weeks, beginning at 5 months of age. At termination of the study, all mice were fasted for 2 hr and euthanized. Tissues were collected, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at 80°C until analysis.

For thermoneutral studies, mice were housed in a temperature-regulated (ambient temp. maintained at 30 ± 1°C) animal facility at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Mice were acclimatized for 2 full weeks prior to experimentation. All experimental procedures conducted on these mice (i.e. GTT and ITT, fasting-refeeding blood collections, tissue dissections, etc.) were completed within the 30°C housing unit to prevent temperature fluctuation.

All mouse protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (animal protocol # MO19M481). All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines and followed the standards established by the Animal Welfare Acts.

Body composition analysis

Body composition analyses for total fat and lean mass, and water content were determined using a quantitative magnetic resonance instrument (Echo-MRI-100, Echo Medical Systems, Waco, TX, USA) at the Mouse Phenotyping Core facility at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Complete blood count analysis

A complete blood count on blood samples was performed at the Pathology Phenotyping Core at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Tail vein blood was collected using EDTA-coated blood collection tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and analyzed using Procyte Dx analyzer (IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, ME, USA).

Indirect calorimetry

Chow or HFD-fed MAC21 male mice and euploid littermates were used for simultaneous assessments of daily body weight change, food intake (corrected for spillage), physical activity, and whole-body metabolic profile in an open flow indirect calorimeter (Comprehensive Laboratory Animal Monitoring System, CLAMS; Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA) as previously described (Sarver et al., 2020). In brief, data were collected for 3 days to confirm mice were acclimatized to the calorimetry chambers (indicated by stable body weights, food intakes, and diurnal metabolic patterns), and data were analyzed from the subsequent 3 days. Mice were observed with ad libitum access to food, throughout the fasting process, and in response to refeeding. Rates of oxygen consumption (V.O2; mL·kg–1·h–1) and carbon dioxide production (V.CO2; mL·kg-1·h–1) in each chamber were measured every 24 min. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER = V.CO2/ V.O2) was calculated by CLAMS software (version 4.93) to estimate relative oxidation of carbohydrates (RER = 1.0) versus fats (RER = 0.7), not accounting for protein oxidation. EE was calculated as EE = V.O2× [3.815 + (1.232×RER)] and normalized to lean mass. In addition, EE was also analyzed using ANCOVA (Tschöp et al., 2012). Physical activities (total and ambulatory) were measured by infrared beam breaks in the metabolic chamber.

Fecal bomb calorimetry and assessment of fecal parameters

Fecal pellet frequency and average fecal pellet weight were monitored by housing each mouse singly in clean cages for 3 days and counting the number of fecal pellets and recording their weight at the end of each 24 hr period. The average of the 3 days was used to generate a mouse average, which were then averaged within a group for comparison across genotype. Fecal pellets from 3 days were combined and shipped to the University of Michigan Animal Phenotyping Core for fecal bomb calorimetry. Briefly, fecal samples were dried overnight at 50°C prior to weighing and grinding them to powder. Each sample was mixed with wheat flour (90% wheat flour, 10% sample) and formed into 1.0 g pellet, which was then secured into the firing platform and surrounded by 100% oxygen. The bomb was lowered into water reservoir and ignited to release heat into the surrounding water. Together these data were used to calculate fecal pellet frequency (bowel movements/day), average fecal pellet weight (g/bowel movement), fecal energy (cal/g feces), and total fecal energy (kcal/day).

Thermography tests

Deep colonic temperature was measured by inserting a lubricated (Medline, water soluble lubricating jelly, MDS032280) probe (Physitemp, BAT-12 Microprobe Thermometer) into the anus at a depth of 2 cm. Stable numbers were recorded on 3 separate days in both the dark and light cycle for each mouse. Skin temperature measurements and images of the tail, abdomen, and suprascapular regions of mice were taken across 3 days, in both the dark and light cycle, using a thermal imaging camera (Teledyne FLIR, Sweden, FLIR-C2) set at a constant distance of ~16 inches away from the specimen.

Bone length measurements

Tibias were dissected and excess tissue was cleared away. A Mitutoyo Corp. digital caliper (500-196-30) was used to measure end-to-end bone length.

GTT and ITT

For GTTs, mice were fasted for 6 hr before glucose injection. Glucose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was reconstituted in saline (0.9 g NaCl/L), sterile-filtered, and injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) at 1 mg/g body weight. Blood glucose was measured at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after glucose injection using a glucometer (NovaMax Plus, Billerica, MA, USA). Blood was collected at 0, 15, and 30 min time points for serum isolation followed by insulin ELISA. For ITTs, food was removed 2 hr before insulin injection. Insulin was diluted in saline, sterile-filtered, and injected i.p. at 1.0 U/kg body weight. Blood glucose was measured at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after insulin injection using a glucometer (NovaMax Plus).

Fasting-refeeding insulin tests

Mice were fasted overnight (~16 hr) then reintroduced to food. Blood glucose was monitored at the 16 hr fast time point (time = 0 hr refed) and at 1, 2, and 3 hr into the refeeding process. Blood was collected at the 16 hr fast and 2 hr refed time points for insulin ELISA. HOMA-IR was calculated as follows (Matthews et al., 1985): [fasting insulin (uIU/mL) × blood glucose (mmol/L)]/22.5.

Blood and tissue chemistry analysis

Tail vein blood samples were allowed to clot on ice and then centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 × g. Serum samples were stored at –80°C until analyzed. Serum triglycerides and cholesterol were measured according to the manufacturer’s instructions using an Infinity kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Middletown, VA, USA). NEFA were measured using a Wako kit (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA, USA). Serum β-hydroxybutyrate (ketone) concentrations were measured with a StanBio Liquicolor kit (StanBio Laboratory, Boerne, TX, USA). Serum insulin (Crystal Chem, 90080), adiponectin (MilliporeSigma, EZMADP-60K), leptin (MilliporeSigma, EZML-82K), growth hormone (MilliporeSigma, EZRMGH-45K), IGF-1 (Crystal Chem, 80574), T3 (Calbiotech, T3043T-100), and T4 (Calbiotech, T4044T-100) levels were measured by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Pancreatic insulin and SST were isolated from pancreas samples using acid-ethanol extraction. Briefly, pancreatic samples were in a solution of acid-ethanol (1.5% HCl in 70% EtOH) and incubated overnight at –20°C. They were then homogenized and incubated for an additional night at –20°C. The following day, samples were centrifuged at 4°C to pellet debris. The aqueous protein-rich solution was transferred to a new tube and neutralized with 1 M Tris pH 7.5. Prior to insulin quantification by ELISA, samples were diluted 1:1000 with ELISA sample diluent. Following ELISA quantification of pancreatic insulin (Mercodia, 10-1247-01) and SST (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals Inc, EK-060-03) protein concentrations of pancreatic samples were quantified using a Bradford assay (Sigma-Aldrich, B6916). Insulin and SST values were then normalized to protein concentration, averaged, and compared across groups.

Histology and quantification

Inguinal (subcutaneous) white adipose tissue (iWAT), gonadal (visceral) white adipose tissue (gWAT), liver, pancreas, suprascapular BAT, and gastrocnemius muscle were dissected and fixed in formalin. Paraffin embedding, tissue sectioning, and staining with hematoxylin and eosin were performed at the Pathology Core Facility at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Images were captured with a Keyence BZ-X700 All-in-One fluorescence microscope (Keyence Corp., Itasca, IL, USA). Adipocyte (gWAT and iWAT) and gastrocnemius CSA, as well as the total area covered by lipid droplets in hepatocytes and BAT adipocytes, were measured on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides using ImageJ software (Schneider et al., 2012). For CSA measurements, all cells in one field of view at 100× magnification per tissue section per mouse were analyzed. For iWAT and gWAT adipocyte CSA, at least 150 cells were quantified per mouse. For pancreatic β-islet CSA, 40× magnification images were stitched together from sections at two depths of the pancreas for a single mouse. All β-islets across the two stitched images were quantified per mouse. Image capturing and quantifications were carried out blinded to genotype.

Immunohistochemistry and quantification

All paraffin sections used for immunofluorescence staining were deparaffinized with SafeClear (Fisher HealthCare, 23-044192), rehydrated using graded concentrations of ethanol in water (100% EtOH, 95%, 75%, 50%, then dH2O), then subjected to antigen retrieval with a pressure cooker for 5 min in sodium citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0). Specimens were washed with a TBS+0.025% Triton X-100 buffer, blocked with 10% normal goat serum at RT for 1 hr, and incubated at 4°C overnight with the appropriate primary antibody. Muscle cells expressing SLN or oxidative fibers were labeled with a rabbit polyclonal anti-SLN antibody (MilliporeSigma, ABT13) or mouse monoclonal Ab to SDHB (Abcam, ab14714), respectively. Primary antibodies were used at a concentration of 1:200 in TBS buffer (with 1% BSA), followed by the appropriate secondary antibody at 1:1000 (diluted in TBS+1% BSA) and incubated for 1 hr at RT. Secondary antibodies used were goat anti-mouse (Invitrogen, Alexa Fluor 594, A21135) and goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen, Alexa Fluor 488, A11008). All specimens were additionally stained with WGA (wheat germ agglutinin, Alexa Fluor 647, W32466) at a concentration of 1:250 in TBS and mounted with a coverslip using ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen, P36935). Images were captured with a Keyence BZ-X700 All-in-One fluorescence microscope (Keyence Corp, Itasca, IL, USA). Muscle cell CSA analysis was completed on specimens stained with WGA. At least 1000 cells of the gastrocnemius muscle were quantified per mouse using ImageJ (Schneider et al., 2012).

Western blots analysis

Protein was isolated from skeletal muscle samples using RIPA buffer as previously described (Rodriguez et al., 2016). Protein lysates used for SLN immunoblots were boiled for 5 min in a loading buffer (50 mM Tris, 2% SDS, 1% β-ME, 6% glycerol, 0.01% bromophenol blue), while those used for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complex immunoblots were heated for 3 min at 50°C in the same buffer. Total protein was quantified by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, 23225), loaded in equal amounts and volume, and run on a 4–20% gradient gel (Bio-Rad, 4561096). Protein was transferred to nitrocellulose or PVDF membrane (SLN and OXPHOS blots, respectively) and blocked in PBS containing 0.2% Tween 20 and 5% non-fat milk for 1 hr, then incubated overnight at 4°C on a shaker with the antibody. SLN was detected using the MilliporeSigma antibody (ABT13, rabbit polyclonal) at a concentration of 1:500. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complexes were detected with the Abcam OXPHOS cocktail antibody (ab110413, mouse monoclonal) at a concentration of 1:5000. GAPDH was detected using the Proteintech antibody (60004-1-Ig, mouse monoclonal) at a concentration of 1:20,000. Anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies conjugated to HRP were used to recognize the primary antibody. Immunoblots were developed using HRP substrate ECL (GE Healthcare), visualized with a MultiImage III FluorChem Q (Alpha Innotech), and quantified with ImageJ. For the OXPHOS membrane, the blot was re-probed with the GAPDH antibody after stripping with ReBlot Plus Strong Antibody Stripping Solution (MilliporeSigma, 2504).

Electron microscopy and quantification

Mouse pancreas was dissected and sectioned into six pieces (~1 mm3) for fixation with freshly prepared electron microscopy-grade 2% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde in 100 mM Sorenson’s phosphate buffer containing 3 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4, and 1144 mOsm overnight at 4°C on slow rocker. Samples were rinsed with the same buffer containing 3% sucrose, 316 mOsm, and osmicated in 2% osmium tetroxide reduced in 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide for 2 hr at 4°C. Tissue was then rinsed in 100 mM maleate buffer containing 3% sucrose pH 6.2 and en bloc stained in 2% uranyl acetate in maleate buffer for 1 hr at 4°C in the dark. Samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, brought to RT in 70% ethanol, and completely dehydrated in 100% ethanol. Samples were resin-embedded (Epon 812, T. Pella) after a propylene oxide transition step and further infiltrated and cured the next day. Eighty-nm-thin compression free sections were obtained with a Diatome diamond knife (35 degrees). Sections were picked up on 1×2 mm formvar-coated copper slot grids (Polysciences) and further stained with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate. Grids were examined on a Hitachi H-7600 transmission electron microscope operating at 80 kV. Images of β-cells and acinar cells were digitally captured at magnifications of ×5000 and ×10,000 from six unique locations in the pancreas of each mouse with an AMT XR 50-5 megapixel CCD camera. Within each of the six locations, at least 600 zymogen granules and 200 insulin granules (dense insulin core and vesicle) were measured for CSA quantification using ImageJ software. Analyses were performed on a total of six randomly selected male chow-fed mice (WT, n=3; KO, n=3) and six randomly selected HFD-fed mice (WT, n=3; KO, n=3). Of the six unique locations from a single mouse, values were averaged to generate a mouse average. Therefore, each data point represents a mouse average comprised of at least 3600 zymogen granules, 1200 dense insulin cores, or 1200 insulin vesicles.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from tissues using Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified total RNA was reverse-transcribed using an iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis was performed on a CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad) using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) per manufacturer’s instructions. Data were normalized to 36B4 gene (encoding the acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein P0) and expressed as relative mRNA levels using the ∆∆Ct method (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008). Fold change data were log transformed to ensure normal distribution and statistics were performed. Real-time qPCR primers used are listed in Supplementary file 15.

RNA-sequencing analysis

A total of 50 samples were sequenced with paired-end 50 bp reads (2×50 bp) across two batches that were balanced for genotype (n=40 across liver, brown fat, subcutaneous fat and visceral fat and n=10 of skeletal muscle). Raw sequencing reads from all samples were aligned to a custom concatenated Gencode hg38+mm10 reference genome using HISAT2 2.0.4 (Kim et al., 2019). Genes were quantified with featureCounts v1.5.0-p3 (Liao et al., 2014) to a custom concatenated hg38+mm10 gtf file within each sample. We retained 24,016 genes with mean RPKM >0.1 across the mouse genome (N=23,801 genes) and chr21 in the human genome (N=215 genes) above this cut-off, and subsequently dropped two samples with outlier RNA-sequencing quality metrics (one SubQ_MAC21 sample with low gene assignment and high mitochondrial rates and one Skeletal_MAC21 sample with low read alignment rate), leaving a total of 48 samples. High-throughput sequencing data from this study have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA877694.

We interrogated the effects of MAC21 genotype, tissue, and the statistical interaction between genotype and tissue on the transcriptome, further adjusting for confounders of gene assignment rate and mitochondrial mapping rate, using the limma voom approach (Law et al., 2014). Given that four of the tissues were derived from the same animals, we used linear mixed effect using the animal ID as a random intercept. We accounted for multiple testing by controlling for the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate across all mouse genes (since human genes were highly enriched for being DEGs given these defined the genotype effect). As a secondary analysis, we modeled the effect of MAC21 genotype within each tissue (also adjusting for the same two sequencing-derived confounders as the full model) using linear regression (since there were no repeated measures within a tissue). Gene set enrichment analyses were performed using clusterProfiler (Yu et al., 2012) and accounted for the false discovery rate.

Respirometry of frozen tissue samples

Respirometry was conducted on frozen tissue samples to assay for mitochondrial activity as described previously (Acin-Perez et al., 2020). Briefly, all tissues were dissected, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C freezer for later analysis. Samples were thawed in MAS buffer (70 mM sucrose, 220 mM mannitol, 5 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM HEPES pH 7.4), finely minced with scissors, then homogenized with a glass Dounce homogenizer. The resulting homogenate was spun at 1000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and immediately used for protein quantification by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, 23225). Each well of the Seahorse microplate was loaded with 8 µg of homogenate protein for all tissue types, except for BAT and heart of which 4 µg was loaded. Each biological replicate is comprised of three technical replicates. Samples from all tissues were treated separately with NADH (1 mM) as a complex I substrate or Succinate (a complex II substrate, 5 mM) in the presence of rotenone (a complex I inhibitor, 2 µM), then with the inhibitors rotenone (2 µM) and antimycin A (4 µM), followed by TMPD (0.45 mM) and ascorbate (1 mM) to activate complex IV, and finally treated with azide (40 mM) to assess non-mitochondrial respiration.

Statistical analyses

All results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed with Prism 9 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Data were analyzed with two-tailed Student’s t-tests or by repeated measures ANOVA. For two-way ANOVA, we performed Sidak’s post hoc tests. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

The work was funded, in part, by grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK084171 to GWW, HD098540 and HD038384 to RHR), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25221308 to MO), and the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR18S4 to YK). The fecal bomb calorimetry analysis was performed at the University of Michigan Animal Phenotyping Core, supported by center grants 1U2CDK135066-01 (Mi-MPMOD) and DK020572 (MDRC). The presented information and its interpretation do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agencies. We thank Nanami Senoo from the Claypool lab for technical advice on conducting the mitochondrial respiration experiments using Seahorse machine.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

G William Wong, Email: gwwong@jhmi.edu.

Akira Shinohara, Osaka University, Japan.

Carlos Isales, Augusta University, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases DK084171 to G William Wong.

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development HD098540 to Roger H Reeves.

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development HD038384 to Roger H Reeves.

  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25221308 to Mitsuo Oshimura.

  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology JPMJCR18S4 to Yasuhiro Kazuki.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

No competing interests declared.

M.O. is CEO, employee, and shareholder of Trans Chromosomics, Inc which manages commercial use of the TcMAC21 mouse. We declare that none of the authors has a conflict of interest.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

Investigation.

Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology.

Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Methodology.

Resources.

Resources.

Resources.

Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Project administration.

Ethics

All mouse protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines and followed the standards established by the Animal Welfare Acts. (animal protocol # MO19M481).

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Tissue weights of chow-fed euploid (n=7) and MAC21 (n=6) male mice at termination of study.

Eu, euploid; BW, body weight; gWAT, gonadal white adipose tissue; iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue.

elife-86023-supp1.xlsx (10.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 2. Indirect calorimetry analysis of male (16.5 weeks of age) euploid (n=8) and MAC21 (n=9) mice fed a standard chow.

Eu, euploid; VO2, rate of oxygen consumption; VCO2, rate of carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; EE, energy expenditure.

elife-86023-supp2.xlsx (12.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 3. Tissue weight of high-fat diet-fed male mice (33 weeks of age; fed diet for 16.5 weeks) at termination of the study.

Eu, euploid; gWAT, gonadal white adipose tissue; iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue; BAT, brown adipose tissue.

elife-86023-supp3.xlsx (10.9KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 4. Complete blood count of euploid (n=5) and MAC21 (n=6) male mice fed a high-fat diet (50 weeks of age; on diet for 13 weeks).

RBC, red blood cell count; HGB, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular (erythrocyte) volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; RET, reticulocyte count; PLT, platelet count; WBC, white blood cells count; NEUT, neutrophil count; LYMPH, lymphocyte count; MONO, monocyte count; EO, eosinophil count; BASO, basophil count; Eu, euploid.

elife-86023-supp4.xlsx (11.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 5. Indirect calorimetry analysis of male (25 weeks of age) euploid (n=8) and TcMAC21 (n=9) mice fed a high-fat diet (8.5 weeks on diet).

Eu, euploid; VOC, rate of oxygen consumption; VCO2, rate of carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; EE, energy expenditure.

elife-86023-supp5.xlsx (12.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 6. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

elife-86023-supp6.xlsx (21.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 7. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

elife-86023-supp7.xlsx (12.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 8. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the liver of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

elife-86023-supp8.xlsx (22.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 9. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the brown adipose tissue (BAT) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

elife-86023-supp9.xlsx (25.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 10. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

Supplementary file 11. RNA-sequence data from skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) showing expression values for atrophy-related genes, contractile and structural genes, fibrosis and injury repair-related genes, and muscle wasting-related genes.
elife-86023-supp11.xlsx (14.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 12. Indirect calorimetry analysis in thermoneutral conditions (31°C) after 2-week acclimatization period of male (55 weeks of age) euploid (n=5) and MAC21 (n=4) mice fed a high-fat diet (18 weeks on diet).

Eu, euploid; VO2, rate of oxygen consumption; VCO2, rate of carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; EE, energy expenditure.

elife-86023-supp12.xlsx (11.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 13. Tissue weights of male MAC21 (n=4) and euploid (n=5) mice (55 weeks of age) housed at thermoneutrality (31°C) and fed a high-fat diet (HFD, 18 weeks on diet).

Eu, euploid; gWAT, gonadal white adipose tissue; iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue; BAT, brown adipose tissue.

elife-86023-supp13.xlsx (10.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 14. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at thermoneutrality (31°C).

Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

elife-86023-supp14.xlsx (25.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 15. List of primers used for all qPCR analysis of gene expression.
elife-86023-supp15.xlsx (15.8KB, xlsx)
MDAR checklist

Data availability

High-throughput sequencing data from this study have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA877694.

The following dataset was generated:

Sarver DC, Xu C, Rodriguez S, Aja S, Jaffe AE, Gao FJ, Delannoy M, Periasamy M, Kazuki Y, Oshimura M, Reeves RH, Wong GW. 2023. Gene expression analyses of TcMAC21 mice. NCBI BioProject. PRJNA877694

References

  1. Acin-Perez R, Benador IY, Petcherski A, Veliova M, Benavides GA, Lagarrigue S, Caudal A, Vergnes L, Murphy AN, Karamanlidis G, Tian R, Reue K, Wanagat J, Sacks H, Amati F, Darley-Usmar VM, Liesa M, Divakaruni AS, Stiles L, Shirihai OS. A novel approach to measure mitochondrial respiration in frozen biological samples. The EMBO Journal. 2020;39:e104073. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019104073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antonarakis SE. Down syndrome and the complexity of genome dosage imbalance. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2017;18:147–163. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonarakis SE, Skotko BG, Rafii MS, Strydom A, Pape SE, Bianchi DW, Sherman SL, Reeves RH. Down syndrome. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 2020;6:9. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0143-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Babu GJ, Bhupathy P, Carnes CA, Billman GE, Periasamy M. Differential expression of Sarcolipin protein during muscle development and cardiac pathophysiology. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2007;43:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bal NC, Maurya SK, Sopariwala DH, Sahoo SK, Gupta SC, Shaikh SA, Pant M, Rowland LA, Bombardier E, Goonasekera SA, Tupling AR, Molkentin JD, Periasamy M. Sarcolipin is a newly identified regulator of muscle-based Thermogenesis in mammals. Nature Medicine. 2012;18:1575–1579. doi: 10.1038/nm.2897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bal NC, Maurya SK, Singh S, Wehrens XHT, Periasamy M. Increased reliance on muscle-based Thermogenesis upon acute Minimization of Brown Adipose tissue function. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2016;291:17247–17257. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.728188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bal NC, Periasamy M. Uncoupling of Sarcoendoplasmic Reticulum calcium ATPase pump activity by Sarcolipin as the basis for muscle non-shivering Thermogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2020;375:20190135. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barclay CJ, Launikonis BS. Components of activation heat in Skeletal muscle. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 2021;42:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10974-019-09547-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barclay CJ, Launikonis BS. A mathematical model to quantify RYR Ca2+ leak and associated heat production in resting human Skeletal muscle fibers. The Journal of General Physiology. 2022;154:e20211299404062022c. doi: 10.1085/jgp.20211299404062022c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baylor SM, Hollingworth S. Sarcoplasmic Reticulum calcium release compared in slow-twitch and fast-twitch fibres of mouse muscle. The Journal of Physiology. 2003;551:125–138. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.041608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertapelli F, Pitetti K, Agiovlasitis S, Guerra-Junior G. Overweight and obesity in children and adolescents with down syndrome-prevalence, determinants, consequences, and interventions: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2016;57:181–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bombardier E, Smith IC, Gamu D, Fajardo VA, Vigna C, Sayer RA, Gupta SC, Bal NC, Periasamy M, Tupling AR. Sarcolipin trumps beta-adrenergic receptor signaling as the favored mechanism for muscle-based diet-induced Thermogenesis. FASEB Journal. 2013;27:3871–3878. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-230631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Campbell KL, Dicke AA. Sarcolipin makes heat, but is it adaptive Thermogenesis? Frontiers in Physiology. 2018;9:714. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chambers PJ, Juracic ES, Fajardo VA, Tupling AR. Role of SERCA and Sarcolipin in adaptive muscle remodeling. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 2022;322:C382–C394. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00198.2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chouchani ET, Kazak L, Spiegelman BM. New advances in adaptive Thermogenesis: Ucp1 and beyond. Cell Metabolism. 2019;29:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Clapham JC, Arch JRS, Chapman H, Haynes A, Lister C, Moore GBT, Piercy V, Carter SA, Lehner I, Smith SA, Beeley LJ, Godden RJ, Herrity N, Skehel M, Changani KK, Hockings PD, Reid DG, Squires SM, Hatcher J, Trail B, Latcham J, Rastan S, Harper AJ, Cadenas S, Buckingham JA, Brand MD, Abuin A. Mice overexpressing human uncoupling Protein-3 in Skeletal muscle are Hyperphagic and lean. Nature. 2000;406:415–418. doi: 10.1038/35019082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dierssen M, Fructuoso M, Martínez de Lagrán M, Perluigi M, Barone E. Down syndrome is a metabolic disease: Altered insulin signaling mediates peripheral and brain dysfunctions. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2020;14:670. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duchon A, Raveau M, Chevalier C, Nalesso V, Sharp AJ, Herault Y. Identification of the translocation Breakpoints in the Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje mouse lines: Relevance for modeling down syndrome. Mammalian Genome. 2011;22:674–684. doi: 10.1007/s00335-011-9356-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Duchon A, Del Mar Muñiz Moreno M, Chevalier C, Nalesso V, Andre P, Fructuoso-Castellar M, Mondino M, Po C, Noblet V, Birling M-C, Potier M-C, Herault Y. Ts66Yah, a mouse model of down syndrome with improved construct and face validity. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2022;15:12. doi: 10.1242/dmm.049721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fajardo VA, Bombardier E, Vigna C, Devji T, Bloemberg D, Gamu D, Gramolini AO, Quadrilatero J, Tupling AR. Co-expression of SERCA Isoforms, Phospholamban and Sarcolipin in human Skeletal muscle fibers. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e84304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fonseca CT, Amaral DM, Ribeiro MG, Beserra ICR, Guimarães MM. Insulin resistance in adolescents with down syndrome: A cross-sectional study. BMC Endocrine Disorders. 2005;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-5-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fructuoso M, Rachdi L, Philippe E, Denis RG, Magnan C, Le Stunff H, Janel N, Dierssen M. Increased levels of inflammatory plasma markers and obesity risk in a mouse model of down syndrome. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2018;114:122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gamu D, Trinh A, Bombardier E, Tupling AR. Persistence of diet-induced obesity despite access to voluntary activity in mice lacking Sarcolipin. Physiological Reports. 2015;3:e12549. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Glancy B, Willis WT, Chess DJ, Balaban RS. Effect of calcium on the oxidative Phosphorylation Cascade in Skeletal muscle mitochondria. Biochemistry. 2013;52:2793–2809. doi: 10.1021/bi3015983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gonzalez-Hurtado E, Lee J, Choi J, Wolfgang MJ. Fatty acid oxidation is required for active and quiescent Brown Adipose tissue maintenance and Thermogenic programing. Molecular Metabolism. 2018;7:45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gribble SM, Wiseman FK, Clayton S, Prigmore E, Langley E, Yang F, Maguire S, Fu B, Rajan D, Sheppard O, Scott C, Hauser H, Stephens PJ, Stebbings LA, Ng BL, Fitzgerald T, Quail MA, Banerjee R, Rothkamm K, Tybulewicz VLJ, Fisher EMC, Carter NP. Massively parallel sequencing reveals the complex structure of an irradiated human Chromosome on a mouse background in the Tc1 model of down syndrome. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e60482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gupta M, Dhanasekaran AR, Gardiner KJ. Mouse models of down syndrome: Gene content and consequences. Mammalian Genome. 2016;27:538–555. doi: 10.1007/s00335-016-9661-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Habtemichael EN, Li DT, Camporez JP, Westergaard XO, Sales CI, Liu X, López-Giráldez F, DeVries SG, Li H, Ruiz DM, Wang KY, Sayal BS, González Zapata S, Dann P, Brown SN, Hirabara S, Vatner DF, Goedeke L, Philbrick W, Shulman GI, Bogan JS. Insulin-stimulated Endoproteolytic TUG cleavage links energy expenditure with glucose uptake. Nature Metabolism. 2021;3:378–393. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00359-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herault Y, Delabar JM, Fisher EMC, Tybulewicz VLJ, Yu E, Brault V. Rodent models in down syndrome research: Impact and future opportunities. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2017;10:1165–1186. doi: 10.1242/dmm.029728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ikeda K, Kang Q, Yoneshiro T, Camporez JP, Maki H, Homma M, Shinoda K, Chen Y, Lu X, Maretich P, Tajima K, Ajuwon KM, Soga T, Kajimura S. Ucp1-independent signaling involving Serca2B-mediated calcium Cycling regulates beige fat Thermogenesis and systemic glucose homeostasis. Nature Medicine. 2017;23:1454–1465. doi: 10.1038/nm.4429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Johann K, Cremer AL, Fischer AW, Heine M, Pensado ER, Resch J, Nock S, Virtue S, Harder L, Oelkrug R, Astiz M, Brabant G, Warner A, Vidal-Puig A, Oster H, Boelen A, López M, Heeren J, Dalley JW, Backes H, Mittag J. Thyroid-hormone-induced Browning of white Adipose tissue does not contribute to Thermogenesis and glucose consumption. Cell Reports. 2019;27:3385–3400. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jouaville LS, Pinton P, Bastianutto C, Rutter GA, Rizzuto R. Regulation of mitochondrial ATP synthesis by calcium: Evidence for a long-term metabolic priming. PNAS. 1999;96:13807–13812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaspari RR, Reyna-Neyra A, Jung L, Torres-Manzo AP, Hirabara SM, Carrasco N. The paradoxical lean phenotype of hypothyroid mice is marked by increased adaptive Thermogenesis in the Skeletal muscle. PNAS. 2020;117:22544–22551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008919117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kazak L, Chouchani ET, Jedrychowski MP, Erickson BK, Shinoda K, Cohen P, Vetrivelan R, Lu GZ, Laznik-Bogoslavski D, Hasenfuss SC, Kajimura S, Gygi SP, Spiegelman BM. A creatine-driven substrate cycle enhances energy expenditure and Thermogenesis in beige fat. Cell. 2015;163:643–655. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kazuki Y, Gao FJ, Li Y, Moyer AJ, Devenney B, Hiramatsu K, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Abe S, Kazuki K, Kajitani N, Uno N, Takehara S, Takiguchi M, Yamakawa M, Hasegawa A, Shimizu R, Matsukura S, Noda N, Ogonuki N, Inoue K, Matoba S, Ogura A, Florea LD, Savonenko A, Xiao M, Wu D, Batista DA, Yang J, Qiu Z, Singh N, Richtsmeier JT, Takeuchi T, Oshimura M, Reeves RH. A non-mosaic Transchromosomic mouse model of down syndrome carrying the long arm of human Chromosome 21. eLife. 2020;9:e56223. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kazuki Y, Gao FJ, Yamakawa M, Hirabayashi M, Kazuki K, Kajitani N, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Abe S, Sanbo M, Hara H, Kuniishi H, Ichisaka S, Hata Y, Koshima M, Takayama H, Takehara S, Nakayama Y, Hiratsuka M, Iida Y, Matsukura S, Noda N, Li Y, Moyer AJ, Cheng B, Singh N, Richtsmeier JT, Oshimura M, Reeves RH. A Transchromosomic rat model with human Chromosome 21 shows robust down syndrome features. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2022;109:328–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and Genotyping with Hisat2 and HISAT-genotype. Nature Biotechnology. 2019;37:907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Korenberg JR, Chen XN, Schipper R, Sun Z, Gonsky R, Gerwehr S, Carpenter N, Daumer C, Dignan P, Disteche C. Down syndrome phenotypes: The consequences of Chromosomal imbalance. PNAS. 1994;91:4997–5001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK. Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-Seq read counts. Genome Biology. 2014;15:R29. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Leitner BP, Huang S, Brychta RJ, Duckworth CJ, Baskin AS, McGehee S, Tal I, Dieckmann W, Gupta G, Kolodny GM, Pacak K, Herscovitch P, Cypess AM, Chen KY. Mapping of human Brown Adipose tissue in lean and obese young men. PNAS. 2017;114:8649–8654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705287114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li B, Nolte LA, Ju JS, Han DH, Coleman T, Holloszy JO, Semenkovich CF. Skeletal muscle respiratory uncoupling prevents diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mice. Nature Medicine. 2000;6:1115–1120. doi: 10.1038/80450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li Z, Yu T, Morishima M, Pao A, LaDuca J, Conroy J, Nowak N, Matsui S-I, Shiraishi I, Yu YE. Duplication of the entire 22.9 MB human Chromosome 21 Syntenic region on mouse Chromosome 16 causes cardiovascular and gastrointestinal abnormalities. Human Molecular Genetics. 2007;16:1359–1366. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to Genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Macdonald WA, Stephenson DG. Effects of ADP on Sarcoplasmic Reticulum function in mechanically Skinned Skeletal muscle fibres of the rat. The Journal of Physiology. 2001;532:499–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0499f.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. MacPherson REK, Gamu D, Frendo-Cumbo S, Castellani L, Kwon F, Tupling AR, Wright DC. Sarcolipin knockout mice Fed a high-fat diet exhibit altered indices of Adipose tissue inflammation and remodeling. Obesity. 2016;24:1499–1505. doi: 10.1002/oby.21521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mall S, Broadbridge R, Harrison SL, Gore MG, Lee AG, East JM. The presence of Sarcolipin results in increased heat production by Ca(2+)-Atpase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281:36597–36602. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606869200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: Insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Maurya SK, Bal NC, Sopariwala DH, Pant M, Rowland LA, Shaikh SA, Periasamy M. Sarcolipin is a key determinant of the basal metabolic rate, and its overexpression enhances energy expenditure and resistance against diet-induced obesity. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:10840–10849. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.636878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Maurya SK, Herrera JL, Sahoo SK, Reis FCG, Vega RB, Kelly DP, Periasamy M. Sarcolipin signaling promotes mitochondrial Biogenesis and oxidative metabolism in Skeletal muscle. Cell Reports. 2018;24:2919–2931. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Milunsky A, Neurath PW. Diabetes mellitus in down’s syndrome. Archives of Environmental Health. 1968;17:372–376. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1968.10665244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mullur R, Liu YY, Brent GA. Thyroid hormone regulation of metabolism. Physiological Reviews. 2014;94:355–382. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00030.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. O’Doherty A, Ruf S, Mulligan C, Hildreth V, Errington ML, Cooke S, Sesay A, Modino S, Vanes L, Hernandez D, Linehan JM, Sharpe PT, Brandner S, Bliss TVP, Henderson DJ, Nizetic D, Tybulewicz VLJ, Fisher EMC. An Aneuploid mouse strain carrying human Chromosome 21 with down syndrome phenotypes. Science. 2005;309:2033–2037. doi: 10.1126/science.1114535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pant M, Bal NC, Periasamy M. Cold adaptation Overrides developmental regulation of Sarcolipin expression in mice Skeletal muscle: SOS for muscle-based Thermogenesis. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2015;218:2321–2325. doi: 10.1242/jeb.119164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Paran CW, Verkerke ARP, Heden TD, Park S, Zou K, Lawson HA, Song H, Turk J, Houmard JA, Funai K. Reduced efficiency of Sarcolipin-dependent respiration in myocytes from humans with severe obesity. Obesity. 2015;23:1440–1449. doi: 10.1002/oby.21123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pearce L, Meizoso-Huesca A, Seng C, Lamboley CR, Singh DP, Launikonis BS. Ryanodine receptor activity and store-operated Ca(2+) entry: Critical regulators of Ca(2+) content and function in Skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2022;1:9512. doi: 10.1113/JP279512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Potier MC, Reeves RH. Editorial: Intellectual disabilities in down syndrome from birth and throughout life: Assessment and treatment. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2016;10:120. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Reinholdt LG, Ding Y, Gilbert GJ, Czechanski A, Solzak JP, Roper RJ, Johnson MT, Donahue LR, Lutz C, Davisson MT. Molecular characterization of the translocation Breakpoints in the down syndrome mouse model Ts65Dn. Mammalian Genome. 2011;22:685–691. doi: 10.1007/s00335-011-9357-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Robb-Gaspers LD, Burnett P, Rutter GA, Denton RM, Rizzuto R, Thomas AP. Integrating cytosolic calcium signals into mitochondrial metabolic responses. The EMBO Journal. 1998;17:4987–5000. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.4987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rodriguez S, Lei X, Petersen PS, Tan SY, Little HC, Wong GW. Loss of Ctrp1 disrupts glucose and lipid homeostasis. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2016;311:E678–E697. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00087.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Roesler A, Kazak L. Ucp1-independent Thermogenesis. The Biochemical Journal. 2020;477:709–725. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20190463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rolfe DF, Brown GC. Cellular energy utilization and molecular origin of Standard metabolic rate in mammals. Physiological Reviews. 1997;77:731–758. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.3.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rowland LA, Bal NC, Kozak LP, Periasamy M. Uncoupling protein 1 and Sarcolipin are required to maintain optimal Thermogenesis, and loss of both systems compromises survival of mice under cold stress. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015a;290:12282–12289. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.637603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rowland LA, Bal NC, Periasamy M. The role of skeletal-muscle-based Thermogenic mechanisms in vertebrate Endothermy. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2015b;90:1279–1297. doi: 10.1111/brv.12157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sahoo SK, Shaikh SA, Sopariwala DH, Bal NC, Periasamy M. Sarcolipin protein interaction with Sarco(Endo)Plasmic Reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) is distinct from Phospholamban protein, and only Sarcolipin can promote uncoupling of the SERCA pump. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288:6881–6889. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.436915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sahoo SK, Shaikh SA, Sopariwala DH, Bal NC, Bruhn DS, Kopec W, Khandelia H, Periasamy M. The N terminus of Sarcolipin plays an important role in uncoupling Sarco-Endoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+-Atpase (SERCA) ATP hydrolysis from Ca2+ transport. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:14057–14067. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.636738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sarver DC, Stewart AN, Rodriguez S, Little HC, Aja S, Wong GW. Loss of Ctrp4 alters Adiposity and food intake behaviors in obese mice. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2020;319:E1084–E1100. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00448.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sarver DC, Xu C, Velez LM, Aja S, Jaffe AE, Seldin MM, Reeves RH, Wong GW. Dysregulated systemic metabolism in a down syndrome mouse model. Molecular Metabolism. 2023;68:101666. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nature Protocols. 2008;3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to Imagej: 25 Years of image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Smith WS, Broadbridge R, East JM, Lee AG. Sarcolipin Uncouples hydrolysis of ATP from accumulation of Ca2+ by the Ca2+-Atpase of skeletal-muscle Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. The Biochemical Journal. 2002;361:277–286. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3610277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Smith IC, Bombardier E, Vigna C, Tupling AR. ATP consumption by Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca(2)(+) pumps accounts for 40-50% of resting metabolic rate in mouse fast and slow twitch Skeletal muscle. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e68924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Son C, Hosoda K, Ishihara K, Bevilacqua L, Masuzaki H, Fushiki T, Harper ME, Nakao K. Reduction of diet-induced obesity in transgenic mice overexpressing uncoupling protein 3 in Skeletal muscle. Diabetologia. 2004;47:47–54. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1272-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sopariwala DH, Pant M, Shaikh SA, Goonasekera SA, Molkentin JD, Weisleder N, Ma J, Pan Z, Periasamy M. Sarcolipin overexpression improves muscle Energetics and reduces fatigue. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2015;118:1050–1058. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01066.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tarasov AI, Griffiths EJ, Rutter GA. Regulation of ATP production by mitochondrial Ca(2+) Cell Calcium. 2012;52:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Toyoshima C, Inesi G. Structural basis of ion pumping by Ca2+-Atpase of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2004;73:269–292. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tschöp MH, Speakman JR, Arch JRS, Auwerx J, Brüning JC, Chan L, Eckel RH, Farese RV, Jr, Galgani JE, Hambly C, Herman MA, Horvath TL, Kahn BB, Kozma SC, Maratos-Flier E, Müller TD, Münzberg H, Pfluger PT, Plum L, Reitman ML, Rahmouni K, Shulman GI, Thomas G, Kahn CR, Ravussin E. A guide to analysis of mouse energy metabolism. Nature Methods. 2012;9:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Vangheluwe P, Schuermans M, Zádor E, Waelkens E, Raeymaekers L, Wuytack F. Sarcolipin and Phospholamban mRNA and protein expression in cardiac and Skeletal muscle of different species. The Biochemical Journal. 2005;389:151–159. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Van Goor JC, Massa GG, Hirasing R. Increased incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus in down’s syndrome. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1997;77:186. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.2.183g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. van Wessel T, de Haan A, van der Laarse WJ, Jaspers RT. The muscle fiber type-fiber size paradox: Hypertrophy or oxidative metabolism. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2010;110:665–694. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1545-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang S, Gopinath T, Larsen EK, Weber DK, Walker C, Uddigiri VR, Mote KR, Sahoo SK, Periasamy M, Veglia G. Structural basis for sarcolipin’s regulation of muscle thermogenesis by the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-Atpase. Science Advances. 2021;7:48. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Yau WW, Singh BK, Lesmana R, Zhou J, Sinha RA, Wong KA, Wu Y, Bay B-H, Sugii S, Sun L, Yen PM. Thyroid hormone (T3) stimulates Brown Adipose tissue activation via mitochondrial Biogenesis and MTOR-mediated Mitophagy. Autophagy. 2019;15:131–150. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1511263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Yi J, Ma C, Li Y, Weisleder N, Ríos E, Ma J, Zhou J. Mitochondrial calcium uptake regulates rapid calcium transients in Skeletal muscle during Excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286:32436–32443. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.217711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among Gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhu J, Tsai HJ, Gordon MR, Li R. Cellular stress associated with Aneuploidy. Developmental Cell. 2018;44:420–431. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zurlo F, Larson K, Bogardus C, Ravussin E. Skeletal muscle metabolism is a major determinant of resting energy expenditure. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1990;86:1423–1427. doi: 10.1172/JCI114857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Akira Shinohara 1

This important paper provides new insight into the effect of extra-copies of a chromosome, thus aneuploidy, on body metabolisms in mammals. The authors used various solid analyses on the metabolisms and physiology of the transgenic mouse with most of human chromosome 21 and presented convincing results to support the authors' claims. The work would be of interest to researchers who work on the physiology and biochemistry of body metabolisms in mammals.

Decision letter

Editor: Akira Shinohara1
Reviewed by: Akira Shinohara2

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Hypermetabolism in mice carrying a near complete human chromosome 21" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, including Akira Shinohara as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen byCarlos Isales as the Senior Editor.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

This paper nicely characterized the physiology and metabolisms of a transgenic mouse with most of human chromosome 21 with 199 protein-coding genes (PCGs) among 213 on the whole chromosome, called TcMAC21 under the normal condition as well as a condition with high-fat diet (HFD). By doing various physiological and metabolic analyses of TcMAC21 mice including transcriptome analysis of both human and mouse genes in the TcMAC21, the authors showed that TcMAC21 mice are lean, hyperactive, and hypermetabolic, which is caused by an increased protein level of sarcolipin, a membrane protein regulating the activity of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) in skeleton muscles, thus futile SERC activity. All experiments were carried out well with control and the results presented in the paper are very much convincing.

One of the weaknesses of the paper is that the authors did not provide any molecular insight on how the presence of human chromosome 21 in skeleton muscles increases the sarcolipin. However, this would be a target of future study.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Fiber types need to be shown across the genotypes for the muscles examined.

Declare what is causing hypermetabolism: resting muscle or active muscle; or a combination of both? Or declare you don't know the proportions.

Many corrections to the description of Ca handling are required, see above.

Figure 5C: Correct spelling: "Ca Handling".

[Editors' note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]

Thank you for resubmitting your work entitled "Hypermetabolism in mice carrying a near complete human chromosome 21" for further consideration by eLife. Your revised article has been evaluated by Carlos Isales (Senior Editor) and a Reviewing Editor.

The manuscript has been improved but there are some remaining issues that need to be addressed, as outlined below:

Based on the #3 reviewer's comments, it would be nice to soften the conclusion by adding some sentences and revising the text.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The authors clearly addressed my concerns as well as ones by the #2 reviewer.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

I am happy with the responses to my points.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

Sarver et al. revisions have improved the paper, however, the data and their responses are not satisfactory. Their interpretation of the data is too strong and the tone needs to be softened. Below are my remaining criticisms.

Dividing EE by lean mass

It is incorrect to normalize EE to lean mass if this parameter is different between groups (PMID: 20103710; PMID: 22205519). As noted clearly in PMID: 22205519, the problem of dividing by lean mass is that the division by lean mass overcompensates for the mass effect. The key conclusion of this paper is that ANCOVA or generalized linear modeling (PMID: 22205519 and references 37-39,43 within) is the most appropriate statistical approach to accommodate discrete (genotype) and continuous (body mass) traits, rather than using a simple division by BW or lean BW. The data where the authors show EE divided by lean mass is completely misleading. Only the ANCOVA should be shown.

Regarding EE by ANCOVA

The authors state in their response: "we have now also included the ANCOVA data (Figure 2D-F and Figure 4D-F) where we used body weight as a covariate as recommended (PMID: 22205519). The results clearly indicate that the TcMAC21 mice have significantly higher EE compared to the euploid controls." I do not understand how the authors can say these results are clear. The ANCOVA of EE (FIGURE 2D, FIGURE 2F and FIGURE 7F) look like they lie on a common line in relation to lean mass. The ANCOVA in FIGURE 2E looks more promising, but it tracks very well with physical activity (i.e. the activity levels are strikingly higher in 2E compared to 2D and 2F). Regarding the ANCOVAs, I cannot find any easily seen statistics that were undertaken to indicate that these effects that are shown indicate an increase in EE that is independent of body composition changes. I do not see any statistics reported for the ANCOVA in the methods or in the figure legends. The word "ANCOVA" appears 4 times in the paper: (1) Figure 2 legend; (2) Figure 4 legend; (3) Fig7 legend; (4) Methods (indirect calorimetry section). So, how can the authors assert that "we have now also included the ANCOVA data (Figure 2D-F and Figure 4D-F) where we used body weight as a covariate as recommended (PMID: 22205519). The results clearly indicate that the TcMAC21 mice have significantly higher EE compared to the euploid controls"?

Regarding mechanistic claims about SERCA-based calcium cycling

The tone about SERCA-based calcium cycling being causal for any metabolic phenotype needs to be toned down substantially. As, the authors note, they cannot determine if their proposed hypermetabolism is arising from movement or SERCA, but considering these associative data and the complete lack of direct analysis of SERCA activity in this paper, it is imperative that the authors tone down their claims about futile calcium cycling. For example, they make strong claims such as: (1) "Unexpectedly, we discovered that TcMAC21 mice have all the hallmarks of hypermetabolism, driven by elevated mitochondrial respiration and futile sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pump activity in the skeletal muscle." (2) "All together, these data suggest that SLN-mediated futile SERCA activity in skeletal muscle is likely the dominant driver underlying the hypermetabolism phenotypes seen in TcMAC21 mice". (3) "Having established that SLN-mediated futile SERCA activity underlies hypermetabolism in TcMAC21 mice….". These statements are quite strong. However, there is no data that directly measures futile SERCA activity and there is no data that link SERCA-mediated calcium cycling to the metabolic effects of TcMAC21 mice. Other than SLN expression, there is no evidence that any futile thermogenic cycle is involved. The authors mention in the responses that "ATP-consuming futile activity of the SERCA pump is presumably happening in resting muscle" but they provide no causal evidence other than mRNA and protein expression. In contrast, there is clear evidence that TcMAC21 mice are more physically active and that the changes in ANCOVA-based EE track well with movement (see above). There is also indications that there is a higher degree of respiratory chain levels, which could be secondary to elevated physical activity – akin to exercise training. This is in contrast to the differences in EE between TcMAC21 mice and controls, where the effect size is minimized at thermoneutrality, even though a major tenet is that SLN expression is high in a temp-independent manner.

Why not anesthetize mice and measure EE to determine if physical activity is driving the increased metabolic rate?

Food intake measurements are not clear

Cumulative food intake would be more informative. The food intake data is plotted per day. How was this measured? For example, was some random day chosen to quantify food consumption, or was the food consumption quantified over the duration of the study and then normalized by the duration to get a daily average? If the latter, then the authors are correct and this could support their argument that food intake is not contributing to the phenotype. If the former, this is questionable of whether the particular day they chose to measure was representative of the entire duration of the intervention.

EE does not seem to be higher at TN

The authors note that "TcMAC21 mice still have significantly higher EE compared to euploid controls when housed at thermoneutrality." First, there are no statistics that I can find in the paper that support the authors' claim. Second, the ANCOVA in FIGURE 7F looks like the regression lines of the EE between the two groups lie on a common line in relation to lean mass. Thus, the authors' claim "the TcMAC21 mice never reduce their EE to the level of euploid controls when housed at thermoneutrality" does not appear correct. Moreover, EE should not be plotted as a histogram, which is what the authors have done in FIGURE 7F to conduct their stats. The statistics should be a 2-way ANOVA for 7F (although beware as the data is improperly normalized by lean mass).

GTT

In my first review, I mentioned that GTT should be normalized to lean mass, since that is very different between TcMAC21 mice and controls. Guidelines have been written about this (PMID: 29143855). However, the authors responded by saying that: "The dose of glucose injection in GTT based on mouse weight is widely and extensively practiced across the metabolic community." I am bewildered by the fact that the authors think that dividing EE by lean mass is acceptable, but then don't think normalizing for lean mass for GTT is appropriate. The response to the ITT being better in TcMAC21, despite getting less of a dose, is a decent argument that the authors provide. Unfortunately, the basal blood glucose levels of the ITT in FIGURE 3K were different to begin with. The authors could normalized the baseline to 100%. This will decrease the difference, but maybe statistical significance can still be reached. Or you could use AUC to correct for baseline differences.

The authors say they "sought to uncover the physiological mechanisms responsible for TcMAC21 resistance to weight gain…". The authors mention that their data strongly support hypermetabolism being the cause of the lean phenotype seen in TcMAC21 mice. However, this has not really been shown. The massive reductions in lean mass have erroneously made it seem like EE is elevated, and the ANCOVAs do not look very promising by eye, but importantly there is no statistical test done on the ANCOVA that I could find. The p value should be placed on the graph to make it clear. In any case, if the authors want to uncover the physiological mechanisms responsible for TcMAC21 resistance to weight gain, EE needs to be measured PRIOR to a change in body composition. If hypermetabolism (i.e. physical activity) is causal, then it should precede the changes in body weight/composition that occur later in life. The authors note in their paper that TcMAC21 mice are born at the same weight as their euploid littermates, but by 3 months of age weigh significantly less. Is there a time-window where TcMAC21 mice can be compared to controls, when their weights are identical? If EE is higher at that early time, this would be strong evidence that hypermetabolism drives the phenotypes associated after weights have diverged.

eLife. 2023 May 30;12:e86023. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86023.sa2

Author response


Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Fiber types need to be shown across the genotypes for the muscles examined.

In the qPCR data as shown in Figure 6C, we have profiled many genes associated with slow- and fast-twitched muscle fibers in gastrocnemius, and little if any changes were noted. At least at the level of the transcript, there is no indication of fiber type switching in gastrocnemius muscle. However, we did not perform the same qPCR analyses for all the other muscle types we isolated (EDL, quadriceps, plantaris, soleus, and tongue). The main reason for this is that we have used all of these muscle in our respirometry analysis shown in Figure 6O-Q and Figure 6—figure supplement 4-9. We did not have any leftover muscle tissue to profile muscle fiber types.

Declare what is causing hypermetabolism: resting muscle or active muscle; or a combination of both? Or declare you don't know the proportions.

In short, we do not know the proportions. The TcMAC21 mice have persistent uncoupling of the SERCA pumps due to chronic overexpression of SLN. However, the mice also are hyperactive in both light and dark cycle, though the hyperactivity is much more pronounced in the dark cycle. Since both SERCA pump uncoupling and hyperactivity are both present at all times of the day, it is difficult to disentangle the relative contribution of each to the hypermetabolic phenotype.

Many corrections to the description of Ca handling are required, see above.

We have fixed all the issues raised by the reviewer.

Figure 5C: Correct spelling: "Ca Handling".

We have fixed this typo in Figure 6C.

[Editors' note: further revisions were suggested prior to acceptance, as described below.]

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

Sarver et al. revisions have improved the paper, however, the data and their responses are not satisfactory. Their interpretation of the data is too strong and the tone needs to be softened. Below are my remaining criticisms.

We have made revisions to the manuscript text accordingly. We have softened the interpretation of our data as recommended.

Dividing EE by lean mass

It is incorrect to normalize EE to lean mass if this parameter is different between groups (PMID: 20103710; PMID: 22205519). As noted clearly in PMID: 22205519, the problem of dividing by lean mass is that the division by lean mass overcompensates for the mass effect. The key conclusion of this paper is that ANCOVA or generalized linear modeling (PMID: 22205519 and references 37-39,43 within) is the most appropriate statistical approach to accommodate discrete (genotype) and continuous (body mass) traits, rather than using a simple division by BW or lean BW. The data where the authors show EE divided by lean mass is completely misleading. Only the ANCOVA should be shown.

We agree with the reviewer that the ANCOVA analysis is very helpful in understanding the metabolic phenotypes of mice. We have provided ANCOVA analyses, including the statistics, in the revision. In our study, EE normalized to lean mass or presented by ANCOVA gives the same results, namely that the TcMAC21 mice have significantly higher energy expenditure. For the sake of transparency and thoroughness, we provided both types of data for the reader to see, as both types of analyses yielded the same results. The 24 hr tracing allows readers to appreciate that TcMAC21 mice have higher EE across the entire circadian cycle (light and dark), as well as across three different metabolic states (ad libitum fed, fasting, refeeding). Even the reviewer had specifically requested that we show the 24 tracing for the thermoneutral data (Figure 7) in the previous round of review. For this reason, we would like to keep all the figure panels. However, to acknowledge the important point raised by the reviewer, we have now clearly stated in the result section (in the revision) that EE normalized to lean mass can result in an overestimation and that ANCOVA results are included to further support our observations that TcMAC21 mice have significantly higher energy expenditure.

Regarding EE by ANCOVA

The authors state in their response: "we have now also included the ANCOVA data (Figure 2D-F and Figure 4D-F) where we used body weight as a covariate as recommended (PMID: 22205519). The results clearly indicate that the TcMAC21 mice have significantly higher EE compared to the euploid controls." I do not understand how the authors can say these results are clear. The ANCOVA of EE (FIGURE 2D, FIGURE 2F and FIGURE 7F) look like they lie on a common line in relation to lean mass. The ANCOVA in FIGURE 2E looks more promising, but it tracks very well with physical activity (i.e. the activity levels are strikingly higher in 2E compared to 2D and 2F). Regarding the ANCOVAs, I cannot find any easily seen statistics that were undertaken to indicate that these effects that are shown indicate an increase in EE that is independent of body composition changes. I do not see any statistics reported for the ANCOVA in the methods or in the figure legends. The word "ANCOVA" appears 4 times in the paper: (1) Figure 2 legend; (2) Figure 4 legend; (3) Fig7 legend; (4) Methods (indirect calorimetry section). So, how can the authors assert that "we have now also included the ANCOVA data (Figure 2D-F and Figure 4D-F) where we used body weight as a covariate as recommended (PMID: 22205519). The results clearly indicate that the TcMAC21 mice have significantly higher EE compared to the euploid controls"?

We apologize that the ANCOVA statistics were not included in the previous revision. We have now included the ANCOVA statistic in Figure 2D, Figure 4D, and Figure 7F, calculated based on the method outlined in the article (PMID: 22205519, Supplementary Note 4). Figure 2D and 2F show diverging regression lines, indicating that as body weight increases there will be no point at which the EE of TcMAC21 mice is not higher than their euploid controls. As exemplified in Figure 1 and 2 of the article (PMID: 22205519), the TcMAC21 mice fit the category where the animals have higher energy expenditure compared to control mice. Even a modest increase in EE can result in significant weight loss over time. Because EE is continuously higher in TcMAC21 relative to euploid controls (regardless of the circadian cycle and metabolic states), this persistently higher EE contributes to the lean phenotype we observed.

Regarding mechanistic claims about SERCA-based calcium cycling

The tone about SERCA-based calcium cycling being causal for any metabolic phenotype needs to be toned down substantially. As, the authors note, they cannot determine if their proposed hypermetabolism is arising from movement or SERCA, but considering these associative data and the complete lack of direct analysis of SERCA activity in this paper, it is imperative that the authors tone down their claims about futile calcium cycling. For example, they make strong claims such as: (1) "Unexpectedly, we discovered that TcMAC21 mice have all the hallmarks of hypermetabolism, driven by elevated mitochondrial respiration and futile sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pump activity in the skeletal muscle." (2) "All together, these data suggest that SLN-mediated futile SERCA activity in skeletal muscle is likely the dominant driver underlying the hypermetabolism phenotypes seen in TcMAC21 mice". (3) "Having established that SLN-mediated futile SERCA activity underlies hypermetabolism in TcMAC21 mice….". These statements are quite strong. However, there is no data that directly measures futile SERCA activity and there is no data that link SERCA-mediated calcium cycling to the metabolic effects of TcMAC21 mice. Other than SLN expression, there is no evidence that any futile thermogenic cycle is involved. The authors mention in the responses that "ATP-consuming futile activity of the SERCA pump is presumably happening in resting muscle" but they provide no causal evidence other than mRNA and protein expression. In contrast, there is clear evidence that TcMAC21 mice are more physically active and that the changes in ANCOVA-based EE track well with movement (see above). There is also indications that there is a higher degree of respiratory chain levels, which could be secondary to elevated physical activity – akin to exercise training. This is in contrast to the differences in EE between TcMAC21 mice and controls, where the effect size is minimized at thermoneutrality, even though a major tenet is that SLN expression is high in a temp-independent manner.

Why not anesthetize mice and measure EE to determine if physical activity is driving the increased metabolic rate?

Per reviewer request, we have toned down the interpretation of our data in the revised manuscript. We agree that we did not provide direct evidence that SLN is the sole contributing factor to the hypermetabolic phenotype observed in the TcMAC21 mice. In our previous revision (based on the comments by reviewer 2), we did indicate that we do not know the relative contribution of elevated metabolism vs. increased physical activity to the overall lean phenotype of TcMAC21 mice. However, some of our evidence suggest that SLN-mediated futile cycling, at least in part, drives the hypermetabolism phenotype we observed; for example, in Figure 6O-Q, we show that mitochondrial respiration is significantly elevated in several different muscle fiber types, including quadriceps, EDL, gastrocnemius, and plantaris. Because SLN overexpression will result in increased ATP utilization (based on published studies referenced in our manuscript), this presumably necessitates an increase in mitochondrial respiration in the skeletal muscle to meet the demand created by the SLN-mediated futile SERCA pump activity. We do not know whether this reflects skeletal muscle adaptation to increased physical activity. As a future follow up experiment, we agree that anesthetizing the mice and measuring EE would be helpful in teasing out the contribution of SLN-overexpression on the hypermetabolic phenotype of TcMAC21 mice. However, the suggested experiment can be technically challenging to perform because the mice need to be housed in the metabolic cage (CLAMS) and at the same time be subjected to prolonged anesthesia (which is known to depress respiration, heart rate, and metabolism).

Food intake measurements are not clear

Cumulative food intake would be more informative. The food intake data is plotted per day. How was this measured? For example, was some random day chosen to quantify food consumption, or was the food consumption quantified over the duration of the study and then normalized by the duration to get a daily average? If the latter, then the authors are correct and this could support their argument that food intake is not contributing to the phenotype. If the former, this is questionable of whether the particular day they chose to measure was representative of the entire duration of the intervention.

Food intake was measured while the mice were in the CLAMS (comprehensive laboratory animal monitoring system). Food intake was measured alongside VO2, VCO2, RER, EE, and activity. The general process can be found in the Methods section under indirect calorimetry. Briefly, data were collected for three days to confirm mice were acclimatized to the calorimetry chambers (indicated by stable body weights, food intakes, and diurnal metabolic patterns), and data were analyzed from the subsequent three days. Data from mice were collected with ad libitum access to food, throughout the fasting process, and in response to refeeding. It is more common for mice to under eat than over eat while in the CLAMS chambers. Therefore, it is less likely that the food intake assessment grossly overestimated the food intake levels of TcMAC21 mice. For the sake of transparency, we provided the food intake data we collected for 6 consecutive days in the CLAMS. In the chow-fed group, the TcMAC21 mice tended to eat a bit more than the euploid controls. For the high-fat group, except day 1 where TcMAC21 eat a little less than euploid controls, the rest of the days the TcMA21 mice eat either a similar amount or significantly more (Day 6, refeeding after a 24 fast). Even though TcMAC21 mice weigh substantially less than the euploid controls, they eat as much as the control mice. This data is consistent with the notion that TcMAC21 mice have significantly higher energy expenditure and therefore need to increase caloric intake to fuel the higher energy metabolism.

Author response table 1.

Food intake (kcal/day)
Chow-fed Euploid TcMAC21 p-value
Day 1 12.93±1.75 13.39±1.07 0.52
Day 2 11.95±2.41 13.16±1.47 0.23
Day 3 12.20±2.60 13.32±1.68 0.3
Day 4 12.74±2.56 13.41±2.26 0.57
Day 5 (fasted) 0 0
Day 6 (Refed) 17.55±2.97 17.32±1.46 0.83
Food intake (kcal/day)
HFD-fed Euploid TcMAC21 p-value
Day 1 15.52±3.68 13.00±1.71 0.06
Day 2 12.30±5.6 12.0±2.22 0.8
Day 3 14.67±5.90 13.80±2.60 0.69
Day 4 15.28±3.40 16.15±2.48 0.55
Day 5 (fasted) 0 0
Day 6 (Refed) 13.04±2.46 17.74±2.30 0.001

EE does not seem to be higher at TN

The authors note that "TcMAC21 mice still have significantly higher EE compared to euploid controls when housed at thermoneutrality." First, there are no statistics that I can find in the paper that support the authors' claim. Second, the ANCOVA in FIGURE 7F looks like the regression lines of the EE between the two groups lie on a common line in relation to lean mass. Thus, the authors' claim "the TcMAC21 mice never reduce their EE to the level of euploid controls when housed at thermoneutrality" does not appear correct. Moreover, EE should not be plotted as a histogram, which is what the authors have done in FIGURE 7F to conduct their stats. The statistics should be a 2-way ANOVA for 7F (although beware as the data is improperly normalized by lean mass).

The statistics for Figure 7F (the bar graphs) were calculated using 2-way ANOVA. We included this information in the figure legend. We have also included the ANCOVA statistics in Figure 7F. The ANCOVA of Figure 7F shows separated and divergent regression lines. Although TcMAC21 mice do still appear to have a higher EE at thermoneutrality relative to euploid controls, because of the small sample size, the P-value (0.069) fell short of reaching statistical significance. We have now revised our manuscript text accordingly. Much of the work was carried out during the first two years of the pandemic where we had to navigate many restrictions imposed on mouse studies. We acknowledge that the thermoneutral study was underpowered and this is clearly a limitation. We did the best we could in light of the major challenges of breeding this new mouse line. We can only use the females for breeding as the males are infertile (similar to other Down Syndrome mouse models). As stated in Supplementary note 5 of the article (PMID: 22205519) “…virtually every study of energy balance yet performed, including all by our own groups, have probably been underpowered to detect subtle effects of the treatment on energy balance.”. The concluding paragraph in the last page of the Supplementary note of the article (PMID: 22205519) also stated: “…we note that referees and editors also need to be realistic in reviewing papers not to insist on completely unrealistic power for this type of analysis. Otherwise nothing will be published.”

GTT

In my first review, I mentioned that GTT should be normalized to lean mass, since that is very different between TcMAC21 mice and controls. Guidelines have been written about this (PMID: 29143855). However, the authors responded by saying that: "The dose of glucose injection in GTT based on mouse weight is widely and extensively practiced across the metabolic community." I am bewildered by the fact that the authors think that dividing EE by lean mass is acceptable, but then don't think normalizing for lean mass for GTT is appropriate. The response to the ITT being better in TcMAC21, despite getting less of a dose, is a decent argument that the authors provide. Unfortunately, the basal blood glucose levels of the ITT in FIGURE 3K were different to begin with. The authors could normalized the baseline to 100%. This will decrease the difference, but maybe statistical significance can still be reached. Or you could use AUC to correct for baseline differences.

Since muscle mass scales with body weight, a heavier mouse will have more lean mass. A quick survey of the recent literature (PMID: 29724723, PMID: 33571454, PMID: 22961109, PMID: 36329217, PMID: 28844881, PMID: 35995995, PMID: 35677645, PMID: 30605666, PMID: 34819664, PMID: 29466739, PMID: 33691105, PMID: 31875646) shows a number of studies that have used glucose dose based on body weight and not lean mass even though there are significant differences (in some cases large differences) in body weight, and in some of these studies the lean mass was also significantly different. Although not an exhaustive search, the authors have been unable to find a study where the dose of glucose injected (in GTT) is based on lean mass. The dose of glucose injected (for GTT) based on body weight likely reflects the fact that the insulin-regulated glucose transporter GLUT4 is mainly expressed in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Adipose-specific knockout of GLUT4 actually has similar metabolic phenotypes as the skeletal muscle-specific knockout of GLUT4 (PMID: 12788932), thus underscoring the relative importance of insulin-regulated glucose uptake in adipose tissue vs. skeletal muscle. Therefore, it provides a rationale to give a dose of glucose based on body weight (accounting for glucose uptake in both lean and fat mass). It is true that the basal blood glucose does not start at the exact same place as represented in the ITT graph of Figure 3K, but this is also not significantly different between genotype. As requested, we included the AUC graph as Author response image 1. The AUC data is consistent with the ITT tracing, indicating greater insulin sensitivity in TcMAC21 mice relative to euploid controls.

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

For insulin sensitivity, we have multiple independent lines of evidence in addition to the GTT data: (1) The ITT data that directly test for insulin action. Even though TcMAC21 received a much smaller dose of insulin (dose based on body weight), glucose clearance was significantly greater in TcMAC21 mice (Fig, 3K). (2) Overnight fasting blood glucose and insulin levels were significantly lower in TcMAC21 mice (Figure 3G). (3) HOMA-IR (insulin resistant index) was significantly lower in TcMAC21 mice (Figure 3H). (4) In the refeeding period following an overnight fast, the TcMAC21 mice blood glucose rose to the same level as the euploid control (Figure 3L), but the rise in insulin levels in response to refeeding was substantially lower in TcMAC21 mice. This indicates that a much lower amount of insulin is required for TcMAC21 to handle the rise in blood glucose after refeeding. Altogether, these data provide strong support that TcMAC21 mice are indeed more insulin sensitive compared to euploid controls.

The authors say they "sought to uncover the physiological mechanisms responsible for TcMAC21 resistance to weight gain…". The authors mention that their data strongly support hypermetabolism being the cause of the lean phenotype seen in TcMAC21 mice. However, this has not really been shown. The massive reductions in lean mass have erroneously made it seem like EE is elevated, and the ANCOVAs do not look very promising by eye, but importantly there is no statistical test done on the ANCOVA that I could find. The p value should be placed on the graph to make it clear. In any case, if the authors want to uncover the physiological mechanisms responsible for TcMAC21 resistance to weight gain, EE needs to be measured PRIOR to a change in body composition. If hypermetabolism (i.e. physical activity) is causal, then it should precede the changes in body weight/composition that occur later in life. The authors note in their paper that TcMAC21 mice are born at the same weight as their euploid littermates, but by 3 months of age weigh significantly less. Is there a time-window where TcMAC21 mice can be compared to controls, when their weights are identical? If EE is higher at that early time, this would be strong evidence that hypermetabolism drives the phenotypes associated after weights have diverged.

There was no “massive reductions in lean mass…” in TcMAC21 mice. This would constitute a pathological condition (aging-associated sarcopenia, injury-associated muscle atrophy, etc). The TcMAC21 mice weigh a lot less. Since skeletal muscle mass scales with body weight, the muscle mass of TcMAC21 mice scale appropriately with their lean body weight, as highlighted by the % lean mass data (Figure 2B and 3A). In fact, the relative lean mass (% of body weight) was higher in HFD-fed TcMAC21 mice relative to euploid controls (Figure 3B). Similarly, a person that weighs 300 pounds will have more muscle mass than someone that weighs 150 pounds; in each case, the muscle mass scales accordingly in order to support different amounts of body weight.

We have now included the ANCOVA statistics in Figure 2, 4 and 7. Except for the thermoneutral data that fell short of reaching statistical significance (due to small sample size), all the other ANCOVA data were highly significant.

We agree that finding a time in which the body weights of TcMAC21 and euploid control mice are equal would be hugely beneficial to uncover more about the hypermetabolism of the TcMAC21mice. Unfortunately, while fed a standard chow or a high-fat diet there is no time window beyond P1 that TcMAC21 mice weigh the same as their euploid littermates. Assessing EE of young pups (while they are still suckling) is technically challenging to conduct. The EE data needs to be collected in a specialized metabolic cage where the animal is individually housed and this is not feasible when the pups are still suckling.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Sarver DC, Xu C, Rodriguez S, Aja S, Jaffe AE, Gao FJ, Delannoy M, Periasamy M, Kazuki Y, Oshimura M, Reeves RH, Wong GW. 2023. Gene expression analyses of TcMAC21 mice. NCBI BioProject. PRJNA877694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 6—source data 1. Top left—Original uncropped membrane from imager showing all channels (red/green/blue), with the sarcolipin protein band labeled as SLN appearing blue.

    Top right—Original uncropped membrane showing a black and white image of the blue channel only. SLN band is marked with an arrow. The dotted outline represents where the membrane image was cropped for use in Figure 6. Bottom left—Original uncropped membrane from imager showing all channels (red/green/blue), with the GAPDH protein band labeled and appearing blue. Bottom right—Original uncropped membrane showing a black and white image of the blue channel only. GAPDH band is marked with an arrow. The dotted outline represents where the membrane image was cropped for use in Figure 6.

    Figure 6—source data 2. Top left—Original uncropped membrane from imager showing all channels (red/green/blue), with the OXPHOS complex protein bands labeled as CI, CII, CIII, CIV, and CV appearing blue.

    Top right—Original uncropped membranes of different exposures showing black and white images of the blue channel only. OXHPHOS complex protein bands are labeled. The dotted outline represents where the membrane image was cropped for use in Figure 6. Bottom left—Original uncropped membrane from imager showing all channels (red/green/blue), with the GAPDH protein band labeled and appearing blue. Bottom right—Original uncropped membrane showing a black and white image of the blue channel only. GAPDH band is marked with an arrow. The dotted outline represents where the membrane image was cropped for use in Figure 6.

    Supplementary file 1. Tissue weights of chow-fed euploid (n=7) and MAC21 (n=6) male mice at termination of study.

    Eu, euploid; BW, body weight; gWAT, gonadal white adipose tissue; iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue.

    elife-86023-supp1.xlsx (10.5KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 2. Indirect calorimetry analysis of male (16.5 weeks of age) euploid (n=8) and MAC21 (n=9) mice fed a standard chow.

    Eu, euploid; VO2, rate of oxygen consumption; VCO2, rate of carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; EE, energy expenditure.

    elife-86023-supp2.xlsx (12.4KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 3. Tissue weight of high-fat diet-fed male mice (33 weeks of age; fed diet for 16.5 weeks) at termination of the study.

    Eu, euploid; gWAT, gonadal white adipose tissue; iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue; BAT, brown adipose tissue.

    elife-86023-supp3.xlsx (10.9KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 4. Complete blood count of euploid (n=5) and MAC21 (n=6) male mice fed a high-fat diet (50 weeks of age; on diet for 13 weeks).

    RBC, red blood cell count; HGB, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular (erythrocyte) volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; RET, reticulocyte count; PLT, platelet count; WBC, white blood cells count; NEUT, neutrophil count; LYMPH, lymphocyte count; MONO, monocyte count; EO, eosinophil count; BASO, basophil count; Eu, euploid.

    elife-86023-supp4.xlsx (11.5KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 5. Indirect calorimetry analysis of male (25 weeks of age) euploid (n=8) and TcMAC21 (n=9) mice fed a high-fat diet (8.5 weeks on diet).

    Eu, euploid; VOC, rate of oxygen consumption; VCO2, rate of carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; EE, energy expenditure.

    elife-86023-supp5.xlsx (12.4KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 6. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

    Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

    elife-86023-supp6.xlsx (21.8KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 7. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

    Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

    elife-86023-supp7.xlsx (12.5KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 8. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the liver of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

    Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

    elife-86023-supp8.xlsx (22.3KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 9. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the brown adipose tissue (BAT) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

    Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

    elife-86023-supp9.xlsx (25.3KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 10. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at 22°C.

    Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

    Supplementary file 11. RNA-sequence data from skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) showing expression values for atrophy-related genes, contractile and structural genes, fibrosis and injury repair-related genes, and muscle wasting-related genes.
    elife-86023-supp11.xlsx (14.5KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 12. Indirect calorimetry analysis in thermoneutral conditions (31°C) after 2-week acclimatization period of male (55 weeks of age) euploid (n=5) and MAC21 (n=4) mice fed a high-fat diet (18 weeks on diet).

    Eu, euploid; VO2, rate of oxygen consumption; VCO2, rate of carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; EE, energy expenditure.

    elife-86023-supp12.xlsx (11.5KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 13. Tissue weights of male MAC21 (n=4) and euploid (n=5) mice (55 weeks of age) housed at thermoneutrality (31°C) and fed a high-fat diet (HFD, 18 weeks on diet).

    Eu, euploid; gWAT, gonadal white adipose tissue; iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue; BAT, brown adipose tissue.

    elife-86023-supp13.xlsx (10.5KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 14. List of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) of euploid and MAC21 male mice fed a high-fat diet housed at thermoneutrality (31°C).

    Lists include: detected human genes and all significantly up- and downregulated mouse genes.

    elife-86023-supp14.xlsx (25.8KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 15. List of primers used for all qPCR analysis of gene expression.
    elife-86023-supp15.xlsx (15.8KB, xlsx)
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    High-throughput sequencing data from this study have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA877694.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Sarver DC, Xu C, Rodriguez S, Aja S, Jaffe AE, Gao FJ, Delannoy M, Periasamy M, Kazuki Y, Oshimura M, Reeves RH, Wong GW. 2023. Gene expression analyses of TcMAC21 mice. NCBI BioProject. PRJNA877694


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES