Skip to main content
Clinical Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Case Reports
. 2023 May 30;11(6):e7027. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7027

Blood culture‐negative infective endocarditis presenting with atypical dermatologic manifestation: A rare case report and review of the literature

Maedeh Najafizadeh 1, Fatemeh Dashti 2, Hamed Pahlevani 3, Farzad Kamalizad 2, Seyed Mohammad Ali Mirazimi 2,
PMCID: PMC10229751  PMID: 37266350

Abstract

Infective endocarditis (IE) rarely presents with cutaneous manifestations due to earlier diagnosis and treatment. We present a case of middle‐aged male patient presenting with an erythematous papular rash in the upper extremities and left knee, further progressing into painful ulcers with crusted and necrotic center in the arms and fingers. These cutaneous lesions were further followed by shaking chills and fever, which brought the patient to our hospital. Laboratory evaluation revealed elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and C‐reactive protein. Blood cultures taken were negative. Biopsy of the skin lesions were consistent with cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and the gram smear revealed gram‐positive cocci. The patient developed dyspnea and chest pain, which raised suspicion for IE. TEE (transesophageal echocardiography) demonstrated mild LV diastolic dysfunction, 1+ tricuspid valve regurgitation, mild mitral regurgitation, and vegetation‐like lesions on the surface of mitral valve leaflets, consequently IE was confirmed. In conclusion, clinicians must look carefully for skin manifestations in cases with high likelihood of IE, even when other typical symptoms are absent.

Keywords: cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis, infective endocarditis, PCI, skin


Clinicians must look carefully for skin manifestations in cases with a high likelihood of IE (infective endocarditis), even when other typical symptoms are absent.

graphic file with name CCR3-11-e7027-g004.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Infective endocarditis (IE) is characterized by inflammation of the endocardium, including the endocardial wall and heart valves. 1 Blood culture‐negative endocarditis (BCNE) is marked by probable or definite endocarditis when three or more blood cultures sampled over 48 h are negative despite adequate incubation (>1 week). It accounts for 2.5%–31% of all cases of IE. 2 Major causes of BCNE include: (1) antibiotic administration prior to sampling (often due to infection with prevalent causative organisms, such as streptococci, staphylococci, or enterococci), (2) presence of fastidious organisms, which are hard to culture. These include Propionibacterium acnes, HACEK bacteria, defective streptococci—Gemella, Abiotrophia sp., Granulicatella, and Candida. (3) the “true” BCNE due to infection with intracellular organisms that may not be typically cultured using conventional techniques (usually due to infection with Bartonella or Coxiella burnetti). 3

IE occurs most commonly in susceptible patients with prosthetic heart valves, unrepaired cyanotic congenital heart diseases, rheumatic fever, intracardiac devices, previous IE, and a history of intravenous drug use. Nonetheless, approximately half of the affected patients have no associated risk factor. 4

IE often presents with symptoms of multi‐organ involvement. Dermatologic manifestations of IE include Osler's nodes, Janeway lesions, cutaneous infarcts, and petechiae, which usually manifest later in the disease course. Although skin manifestations are important in evaluating patients with infective endocarditis, few studies in the literature have evaluated their importance in disease manifestation and the diagnostic dilemma associated with atypical presenting symptoms. This report discusses the key skin findings in afflicted individuals and offers a case of IE with unusual skin symptoms.

2. CASE PRESENTATION

The patient is a 58‐year‐old man with a medical history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease with recent acute myocardial infarction and primary cutaneous intervention (PCI) who presented to the emergency department with the abrupt onset of shaking chills associated with fever and drenching sweats. The day prior to admission, the patient had similar symptoms, for which he received intravenous antipyretics in a primary urgent care center. In addition, he complained of an erythematous papular rash that had begun 10 days prior to admission and had progressed to involve the bilateral upper extremities, anterior aspect of the left knee, and fingers on both hands. After 7 days, these lesions had progressed into painful ulcers with a crusted and necrotic center without an associated purulent discharge, especially in the arms and fingers. The patient did not seek any medical care for these skin lesions. In addition, he also suffered from episodic retrosternal chest discomfort for 1 week. Social history was significant for exposure to poultry. The patient was a lifelong non‐smoker and did not use illicit or recreational drugs.

Upon arrival, the patient was alert, oriented, and toxic appearing with a blood pressure of 103/56 mmHg, a temperature of 38.5°C, a heart rate of 78 beats per minute, and a respiratory rate of 17 per minute. Physical examination of the skin revealed numerous erythematous papules and plaques of 1*1–2*2 cm mainly located on the extensor aspect of the right forearm, anterior aspect of the left knee, and first finger of the left hand. These lesions had an erythematous rim and central, necrotic crusts in association with a mildly purulent area surrounding the crusted zone. There were no purulent discharges, and the lesions were extremely tender to minimal palpation. Since the patient was initially admitted to the emergency department, no picture of the initial lesion is present. His cardiac examination showed a regular rhythm and rate with no murmurs. The remainder of the physical examination was normal.

Laboratory evaluation demonstrated no significant leukocytosis but an elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and CRP (C‐reactive protein). The CRP was 47 at the first exam and reduced to 3 after 2 weeks. The results of the complete metabolic panel were within the normal ranges. Serial troponin and EKG monitoring were normal. A chest X‐ray revealed no abnormality. Blood cultures acquired initially were negative. An infectious disease consultation was obtained, and intravenous antibiotics (levofloxacin and imipenem) were administered to treat the probable pseudomonal‐related sepsis due to probable ecthyma gangrenosum. Following antibiotic administration, the fever subsided and the skin rash improved. During the course of the hospitalization, three separate sets of blood cultures were obtained and turned negative.

A dermatology consultation was performed, and smears of the lesions were obtained and cultured to evaluate cutaneous leishmaniasis, gram‐positive organisms including Streptococci and Bacillus anthracis, and fungal infections. Since the patient was from an endemic region for malaria and leishmaniasis, the peripheral blood smear was evaluated for malaria and leishmaniasis parasites. Intravenous levofloxacin was exchanged for oral levofloxacin. The gram smear of the lesion demonstrated gram‐positive cocci with polymorphonuclear cells with no fungi, bacillus, or leishmania bodies. The culture of the lesion turned negative after adequate incubation. On the 7th day of admission, the fever relapsed. A COVID‐19 PCR was obtained and turned positive. As a result, early treatment with remdesivir was initiated; levofloxacin was discontinued; and intravenous vancomycin was instilled. The patient developed new erosive oral enanthems and smaller lesions similar to the primary manifestation, most commonly on the fingers and the left knee (Figure 1). Considering this and the recently diagnosed COVID‐19 infection, the cutaneous lesion of the knee was biopsied. Subsequently, the patient complained of intermittent, short‐lasting, squeezing chest discomfort accompanied by mild dyspnea. Serial EKG monitoring and blood troponin levels were normal. TTE (transthoracic echocardiography) revealed normal LV (left ventricular) systolic function, mild LV diastolic dysfunction, 1+ tricuspid valve regurgitation, mild mitral valve regurgitation, and vegetation‐like lesions on the surface of mitral valve leaflets (Figure 2). Meanwhile, repeated blood cultures turned negative. A previous TTE from 3 months earlier revealed no abnormality, despite mild LV diastolic dysfunction following acute myocardial infarction. The result of the skin biopsy revealed perivascular inflammatory infiltrates, predominantly polymorphonuclear cells, and lymphocytes, in combination with extravasated red blood cells and fragmented nuclear debris, consistent with cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (Figure 3). The patient was subsequently diagnosed with possible subacute bacterial endocarditis based on the modified Duke criteria for infective endocarditis, with endocardial involvement as the major clinical criteria and fever and vascular phenomena as the minor criteria. The skin lesions were likely due to septic embolization and deposition of circulating immune complexes, with the resultant leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Antibiotic therapy was continued 4 weeks and the patient's symptoms improved remarkably. In his follow‐up TEE, the vegetations were resolved, but the mild mitral regurgitation reported by his cardiologist was without any heart failure, and he was finally discharged home with stable vital signs. He came to visit weekly until twice a month after his hospitalization, then monthly until twice a month, and finally every 3 months.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Round, well‐circumscribed ulcers with erythematous border and necrotic central zone.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Small, vegetation‐like particles are evident on the surface of mitral valve leaflet.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Skin biopsy of the knee lesions. Perivascular inflammatory infiltrates, mainly composed of neutrophils and lymphocytes in association with extravasated red blood cells and fragments of the nuclear debris. (Hematoxylin and eosin stain).

3. DISCUSSION

Infective endocarditis (IE) may lead to life‐threatening complications. The incidence of IE has changed widely in the last decade, with a significant rise particularly in the developing countries. 5 Symptoms of IE are caused by a variety of mechanisms: (a) direct local destruction of the involved endocardial surfaces, (b) hematogenous dissemination to other tissues, (c) metastatic embolization of fragments to other organs, and (d) formation of immune complexes and precipitation in the distant sites. IE is currently diagnosed based on the modified Duke criteria, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 99%; however, its diagnosis may be delayed due to the wide range of non‐specific symptoms. 6 In the developed countries, Staphylococci has become gradually as the most frequent pathogenic organism isolated in infective endocarditis, possibly due to increased rate of intravenous drug use or advanced hemodialysis, whereas Streptococci accounts for the majority of cases in the developing countries. 7 , 8 Rate of positive blood cultures in patients with infective endocarditis ranges between 83 and 96% in developed countries. 9 Extensive administration of antibiotics prior to sampling may contribute to the low rate of microbiological detection in BCNE, particularly due to gram‐positive cocci. Installation of specific PCR (polymerase chain reaction) tests depending on the geographic distribution pattern of most common causative organisms, may yield a higher detection rate. 10 Likewise, our patient had negative blood cultures on serial sampling, possibly due to consumption of antibiotics prior to referral to our hospital.

Infective endocarditis may present with skin lesions in approximately 5%–25% of affected patients. The most commonly reported cutaneous lesions include purpura, followed by Osler nodes and Janeway lesions in decreasing order of frequency. Purpura is more commonly found on the lower extremities. 11 The incidence of Osler nodes and Janeway lesions have reduced significantly in the recent years, changing from 10 to 23% in the 1980 s to <10% for Osler nodes and ranging between 1.6% and 4.7% for Janeway lesions. 12 This decline is likely due to earlier diagnosis of IE and installation of treatment, which does not allow the formation of skin lesions. 11 Based on the modified Duke criteria, Osler nodes, and Janeway lesions are considered immunologic phenomena and vascular phenomena; respectively, however, both these lesions have similar pathogenesis, with septic microemboli lodging in vessels, leading to the activation of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. In addition, immune‐mediated vasculitis has been also found in the pathogenesis of Osler nodes. Histopathologic examination of both lesions demonstrates septic microemboli with necrotic dermal micro‐abscesses. 13 Osler nodes are characterized clinically as tender, subcutaneous, violaceous nodules most frequently located on the toes and fingers and to a lesser degree on the lateral digits, thenar, and hypothenar region. On the other hand, Janeway lesions are marked by irregular, non‐tender, erythematous, or hemorrhagic nodules or macules, often found on the palms. 12

Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis is characterized by vasculitis of small‐sized, dermal capillaries, and venules. It may occur as a result of autoimmune disorders, drug reactions, malignancy, and infections. Clinically, it manifests as erythematous, palpable purpura on the dependent lower extremities. Most common infectious causes of leukocytoclastic vasculitis include streptococci and staphylococci. 14 Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis as the presentation of infective endocarditis has been reported well in the literature. It is likely due to the deposition of circulating immune complexes and emboli on the vascular endothelial surface. 15 Moreover, cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis may be associated with deposition of IgA in various organs, specifically the kidneys, resulting in varying degree of proteinuria, hematuria or renal failure and IgA glomerulonephritis in the renal biopsy. 16 In our patient, although the lesions were not typical of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, the histologic examination was consistent with cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and the gram smear of the lesion showed gram‐positive cocci, excluding other non‐infectious causes, highlighting an underlying infectious disorder as the culprit of his skin finding, which in association with his other clinical symptoms (dyspnea and chest pain) raised suspicion for infective endocarditis. Of note, skin manifestations carry poor prognosis in infective endocarditis, as they are associated with an embolic process. 11

Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires installation of numerous devices into the arterial circulation, which increases the likelihood of bacteremia or septicemia. In a study of Ramsdale et al. 17.7% of patients undergoing complex PCI developed bacteremia immediately following PCI, with the coagulase‐negative staphylococci being the most commonly isolated organism and 12% developed positive blood cultures within 12 h post‐PCI. Interestingly, no clinical sequelae developed. 17 Our patient had a recent history of PCI 4 weeks prior to admission. This hint in association with gram‐positive cocci in the gram smear of lesions and resolution of lesions following administration of vancomycin, implicates coagulase‐negative staphylococci as the causative organism.

Our case displays the cutaneous manifestations of IE as the presenting symptoms in the absence of other more common features. Hence, clinicians must carefully assess for skin manifestations in borderline scenarios, as skin involvement often conveys worse outcomes.

4. CONCLUSION

Our case depicts atypical presentations of IE that may complicate the initial diagnosis. It is noteworthy for physicians to investigate the skin lesions of IE, particularly when the diagnosis is not definite. Skin manifestations implicate an increased risk of embolic complications; thus, a delayed diagnosis may be life‐threatening. This further necessitates the importance of a thorough physical examination for physicians.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All co‐authors contributed significantly to this study. MN, HP, and FK collected patient's data. The initial draft of the manuscript was written by FD and SMAM. Final version of the manuscript was edited by SMAM and FD. This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue. The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.

FUNDING INFORMATION

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

No competing interests.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.

INFORMED CONSENT

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Not applicable.

Najafizadeh M, Dashti F, Pahlevani H, Kamalizad F, Mirazimi SMA. Blood culture‐negative infective endocarditis presenting with atypical dermatologic manifestation: A rare case report and review of the literature. Clin Case Rep. 2023;11:e7027. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7027

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bumm CV, Folwaczny M. Infective endocarditis and oral health‐a narrative review. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021;11(6):1403‐1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Katsouli A, Massad MG. Current issues in the diagnosis and management of blood culture‐negative infective and non‐infective endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(4):1467‐1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tattevin P, Watt G, Revest M, Arvieux C, Fournier PE. Update on blood culture‐negative endocarditis. Med Mal Infect. 2015;45(1–2):1‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gomes RT, Tiberto LR, Bello VN, Lima MA, Nai GA, Abreu MA. Dermatologic manifestations of infective endocarditis. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91(5 suppl 1):92‐94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wu Z, Chen Y, Xiao T, Niu T, Shi Q, Xiao Y. Epidemiology and risk factors of infective endocarditis in a tertiary hospital in China from 2007 to 2016. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Conti T, Barnet B. The diagnostic challenge of infective endocarditis: cutaneous vasculitis leading to the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14(6):451‐456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Elbey MA, Akdağ S, Kalkan ME, et al. A multicenter study on experience of 13 tertiary hospitals in Turkey in patients with infective endocarditis. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2013;13(6):523‐527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ambrosioni J, Hernandez‐Meneses M, Téllez A, et al. The changing epidemiology of infective endocarditis in the twenty‐first century. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2017;19(5):21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fernandes E, Olive C, Inamo J, Roques F, Cabié A, Hochedez P. Infective endocarditis in French West Indies: a 13‐year observational study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(1):77‐83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fournier PE, Gouriet F, Casalta JP, et al. Blood culture‐negative endocarditis: improving the diagnostic yield using new diagnostic tools. Medicine. 2017;96(47):e8392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Servy A, Valeyrie‐Allanore L, Alla F, et al. Prognostic value of skin manifestations of infective endocarditis. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(5):494‐500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Marrie TJ. Osler's nodes and Janeway lesions. Am J Med. 2008;121(2):105‐106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Alpert JS. Osler's nodes and Janeway lesions are not the result of small‐vessel vasculitis. Am J Med. 2013;126(10):843‐844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Fekete GL, Fekete L. Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis associated with erlotinib treatment: a case report and review of the literature. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(2):1128‐1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. El Chami S, Jibbe A, Shahouri S. Bacterial endocarditis presenting as Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis. Cureus. 2017;9(7):e1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Srivali N, Ungprasert P. Coexistence of Henoch‐Schönlein purpura and infective endocarditis in elderly. Am J Med. 2015;128(5):e17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ramsdale DR, Aziz S, Newall N, Palmer N, Jackson M. Bacteremia following complex percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16(11):632‐634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES