Skip to main content
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
editorial
. 2023 May 17;17:1211465. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1211465

Editorial: The role of the basal ganglia in somatosensory-motor interactions: evidence from neurophysiology and behavior, volume II

Martijn Beudel 1,*, Antonella Macerollo 2,3, Matt J N Brown 4, Robert Chen 5
PMCID: PMC10230070  PMID: 37266324

In the second edition of the Research Topic, named “The role of the basal ganglia in somatosensory-motor interactions: evidence from neurophysiology and behavior II,” seven articles have been published. All seven contributions consisted of original work. Interestingly, each article used a unique approach (see Table 1) to study basal-ganglia function varying from psychophysics (Sengupta et al.) to invasive micro-electrode recordings (MER, Filyushkina et al.). This heterogeneity of approaches is in line with the approaches described in its predecessor (Beudel et al., 2020).

Table 1.

Overview of the published articles.

References Type (Brief) title (Unique) technique Disease
Basha et al. Original Beta band oscillations in the motor thalamus LFP ET/PD
Campbell et al. Original The impact of pulse timing on cortical and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation evoked potentials EEG PD
Chen et al. Original Disrupted Brain Structural Network Connection in de novo Parkinson's disease with RBD DTI (RBD) PD
Filyushkina et al. Original Attenuation of neural responses in subthalamic nucleus during internally guided voluntary movements in Parkinson's disease MER PD
Lan et al. Original Functional connectivity of the basal ganglia subregions in pain syndromes Resting state fMRI Pain syndrome
Pinky et al. Original Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging of youth sport-related concussion Multimodal MRI TBI
Sengupta et al. Original Exploration of sensory-motor tradeoff behavior in Parkinson's disease Psychophysics PD

LFP, local field potential; ET, essential tremor; PD, Parkinson's disease; EEG, electro-encephalography; RBD, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; MER, micro electrode recording; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

One important question is whether the approaches used in the current edition were available in the era of the first edition (2019–2020). Although 3 years seems a short period, as we know after the pandemic, a lot can happen. One important development in studying the basal ganglia over the last 3 years is the availability of commercially available DBS devices by at least three companies that can record local field potentials (LFP's) from fully implanted devices (Chen et al., 2020; Marceglia et al., 2022; Stam et al., 2023). However, despite these developments, initial explorations have mainly focused on the feasibility of using this new technique before research programs will adapt toward LFP recordings from fully implantable DBS devices. At this moment, certain limitations in this technology are still present. For example, sampling frequencies are still restricted to 256 Hz by some devices, which makes it impossible to perform the pulse-timing work at the millisecond scale by Campbell et al. and the MER work by Filyushkina et al.. In theory, the third study that made use of subcortical recordings and studied the beta band (13–30 Hz) in the thalamus (Basha et al.), could have made use of the currently available fully-implantable devices that have also been able to record LFP activity in the thalamus (Buijink et al., 2022). Since LFP recordings from fully-implantable devices offer many advantages such as the possibility to record for longer periods and to apply adaptive stimulation paradigms (Nakajima et al., 2021), it is expected that the field will adapt this technology in the coming years.

Next to the applied methods in the Research Topic, the diseases studied are also noteworthy. Although the role of the basal ganglia in movement disorders has been studied extensively, this is far less the case for (urologic) pain syndromes and traumatic brain injury (TBI) as respectively described by Lan et al. and Pinky et al.. The findings of the study by Lan et al. further illustrate the role of the basal ganglia in pathological somatosensory-motor interactions in abnormal sensations (i.e., pain) and Pinky et al. studied the role of the caudate as modulator in the recovery of TBI. These insights show how studying basal-ganglia functions beyond movement disorders can help in developing neuro-modulation strategies and the development of (image-based) biomarkers. The development of biomarkers is also relevant for the prodromal stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) such as in patients with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD), which are at a higher risk for developing PD. By identifying these patients using advanced imaging approaches, such as described by Chen et al., patients may benefit in the future from disease- modifying therapies before the onset of motor symptoms (Athauda et al., 2019).

Although these insights from imaging studies comparing patient populations with controls are valuable for the reasons mentioned above, they lack a behavioral component showing how altered (network) processing actually leads to disturbed basal-ganglia function. In their contribution Sengupta et al. show the nature of response disinhibition in PD during natural movement performance whilst (Filyushkina et al.) were able to distinguish neural patterns of self-initiated vs externally cued response in the STN. With the dawn of DBS stimulation paradigms that influence decision making processes (Ghahremani et al., 2018; Herz et al., 2018), it is of utmost relevance to understand the basal-ganglia contributions underlying autonomous action selecting and its interference by either diseases (e.g., PD) or therapies (e.g., DBS).

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the editorial and have seen all revisions, including the final revision.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Athauda D., Maclagan K., Budnik N., Zampedri L., Hibbert S., Aviles-Olmos I., et al. (2019). Post hoc analysis of the exenatide-PD trial—factors that predict response. Eur. J. Neurosci. 49, 410–421. 10.1111/ejn.14096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beudel M., Macerollo A., Brown M. J. N., Chen R. (2020). Editorial: The role of the basal ganglia in somatosensory-motor interactions: evidence from neurophysiology and behavior. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 451. 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buijink A. W. G., Piña-Fuentes D. A., Stam M. J., Bot M., Schuurman P. R., van den Munckhof P., et al. (2022). Thalamic local field potentials recorded using the deep brain stimulation pulse generator. Clin. Neurophysiolo. Pract. 7, 103–106. 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen Y., Gong C., Tian Y., Orlov N., Zhang J., Guo Y., et al. (2020). Neuromodulation effects of deep brain stimulation on beta rhythm: a longitudinal local field potential study. Brain Stimul. 13, 1784–1792. 10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghahremani A., Aron A. R., Udupa K., Saha U., Reddy D., Hutchison W. D., et al. (2018). Event-related deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus affects conflict processing. Ann. Neurol. 84, 515–526. 10.1002/ana.25312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herz D. M., Little S., Pedrosa D. J., Tinkhauser G., Cheeran B., Foltynie T., et al. (2018). Mechanisms underlying decision-making as revealed by deep-brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease. Curr. Biol. 28, 1169–1178.e6. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marceglia S., Conti C., Svanidze O., Foffani G., Lozano A. M., Moro E., et al. (2022). Double-blind cross-over pilot trial protocol to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of long-term adaptive deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease. BMJ Open 12, e049955. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nakajima A., Shimo Y., Fuse A., Tokugawa J., Hishii M., Iwamuro H., et al. (2021). Case report: chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation personalizing therapy based on Parkinsonian state. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 702961. 10.3389/fnhum.2021.702961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stam M. J., van Wijk B. C. M., Sharma P., Beudel M., Piña-Fuentes D. A., de Bie R. M. A., et al. (2023). A comparison of methods to suppress electrocardiographic artifacts in local field potential recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol. 146, 147–161. 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES