Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2023 Mar 22;12:317. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.131558.1

Restinga ectomycorrhizae: a work in progress

Ariadne N M Furtado 1,a, Marco Leonardi 2, Ornella Comandini 3, Maria Alice Neves 1, Andrea C Rinaldi 3
PMCID: PMC10230178  PMID: 37265684

Abstract

Background: The Brazilian Atlantic Forest is one of the most biodiverse terrestrial ecoregions of the world. Among its constituents, restinga vegetation makes a particular case, acting as a buffer zone between the oceans and the forest. Covering some 80% of Brazilian coastline (over 7,300 km in length), restinga is a harsh environment where plants and fungi interact in complex ways that just now are beginning to be unveiled. Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, in particular, plays a so far ungauged and likely underestimated role. We recently described the morpho-anatomical and molecular features of the ectomycorrhizae formed by several basidiomycetous mycobionts on the host plant Guapira opposita, but the mycorrhizal biology of restinga is still largely unexplored. Here, we report new data on the ectomycorrhizal fungal symbionts of G. opposita, based on the collection of sporomata and ectomycorrhizal root tips in restinga stands occurring in southern Brazil.

Methods: To obtain a broader view of restinga mycorrhizal and ecological potential, we compiled a comprehensive and up-to-date checklist of fungal species reported or supposed to establish ectomycorrhizae on restinga-inhabiting host plants, mainly on the basis of field observations.

Results: Our list comprises some 726 records, 74 of which correspond to putative ectomycorrhizal taxa specifically associated with restinga. These include several members of Boletaceae, Amanita, Tomentella/ Thelephora, Russula/ Lactifluus, and Clavulina, as well as hypogeous fungi, like the recently described Longistriata flava.

Conclusions: Our survey reveals a significant diversity of the restinga ectomycorrhizal mycobiota, indicating the importance of this symbiosis for the ecological functioning of a unique yet poorly known and threatened ecosystem.

Keywords: Atlantic Forest, Brazilian fungi, diversity, ectomycorrhiza, fungal conservation, mycorrhizal symbiosis, Neotropics

Introduction

Understanding how communities come together has been a primary goal of researchers over the last century. In addition to the diversity of organisms and their multiple strategies to resist environmental conditions, interspecific interactions add another layer of complexity to the structure of communities. 1 The mycorrhizal symbiosis is one of the most prominent and ecologically crucial mutualistic associations found in terrestrial habitats. 2 Plant and fungal partners interact in the rhizosphere, which contributes significantly to nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration. 3 , 4 The composition of mycorrhizal fungi in an ecosystem directly affects plant community structure, and environmental factors that influence species diversity over time have an impact on host selectivity for plant communities and fungal associations. 5

Research on arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) is quite advanced in Brazil, with over 40 years of history. 6 However, our fascination with plant-fungus interactions took a different path allowing us to focus and investigate another intriguing mutualistic association, the ectomycorrhizae (ECM), from natural habitats of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, particularly from the restinga. At the global scale, ectomycorrhizal plants have been documented in approximately 335 genera and 8,500 species, with recent research indicating that a large portion of plant symbionts have yet to be confirmed, specifically in the tropics. 7 On the other hand, ectomycorrhizal fungi have been assigned to 236 genera and approximately 20,000-25,000 species, 8 which is a small number when compared to current estimates of 2.2 to 3.8 million fungal species diversity. 9

In Brazil, ectomycorrhizal fungi often have a fragmented distribution due to the lack of information about them and because they do not always have the same distribution as the host plants. 10 , 11 This can result in high endemism at the species level due to the specific habitats they occupy. 12 14 In 2016, Roy and coworkers reported approximately 180 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Brazilian native forests. 15 In fact, the majority of the published studies were conducted in introduced Pinus and Eucalyptus plantations. 14 , 16 18 As a result, the diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with native plants of the Atlantic Forest still needs understanding. 14 , 15 , 19

The Atlantic Forest, which is home to several endemic species, is one of the world's top 25 priority areas for biodiversity conservation. 20 The high diversity of potentially ectomycorrhizal plant species suggests a large but still unknown diversity of ectomycorrhizal partners. 11 These relationships can be generalist, 21 however, there are cases of proven specificity, resulting from a long process of joint evolution between plants and fungi. 5 The Atlantic Forest includes ecosystems such as the restinga, where at least 700 specimens of typically ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa have already been collected. 22

The restinga was one of the first environments to be harmed by human intervention. Currently, 79% of the Brazilian coast is covered by restinga, representing an essential constituent of the Atlantic Forest. 23 However, in terms of biodiversity and conservation status, these ecosystems remain poorly understood. Restinga vegetation is associated with Quaternary coastal sand deposits and rocky coastal habitats, 24 grows on sandy soils near the sea between lake formations and/or dunes and, as it moves away from the ocean, is composed of creeping plants, shrubs and trees, including forming forests. 25

Due to the high frequency of symbiotic interaction in the restinga, ECM have a potentially critical role in restoration and management interventions in these ecosystems. 26 ECM can improve host plant resistance to pathogens through direct competition; 27 they can increase plant drought tolerance by improving plant-soil contact surface, host plant water conductivity, and resistance to high soil salinity by restricting sodium uptake by plant tissues and activating stress response pathways. 28 Sadly, anthropic activities are negatively affecting the diversity and functionality of the ectomycorrhizal community in forest soils due to soil erosion, changes in land use, inorganic toxins, fire, and non-native plant invasions. 29 Such processes have promoted the elimination of many populations and, potentially, the decrease of the genetic diversity of several species. 30 Nevertheless, these ecosystems are not considered priority conservation areas, and the high degree of degradation observed becomes especially harmful in a scenario of accelerated climate change. 31 Studies that aim to understand ectomycorrhizal interactions of restinga are important to help develop conservation and restauration projects. However, they are still in their early stages, especially because the majority of them are based solely on the presence of sporomata. To date, only two works have been published that link both fungus and plant partners in the restinga and present a detailed morphological and molecular characterization of the ECM ( Hysterangium atlanticum + Coccoloba spp. 32 and Amanita viscidolutea + Guapira opposita 33 ). Researches that have been developed in Brazil corroborate the urgent need to better understand the belowground diversity in the Atlantic Forest, especially considering that the restinga potentially harbors a unique community of mycorrhizal taxa. 34 In this work we present new information on ECM from restinga, through collections of basidiomata, as well as ectomycorrhizal root tips. Furthermore, based on survey data from national fungaria and herbaria, published literature, field observations, and molecular approaches, we provide a comprehensive and updated list of fungal species reported as (or supposed to) establishing ECM with native plants in the restinga. The data presented here reveal a high diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the restinga and are discussed further below.

Methods

Restinga: definition and area extension

The restinga consists of a transition zone (ecotone) that acts as a buffer zone between the oceans and the forests and includes Holocene sands of marine origin. 25 Because of rapid leaching and the closeness of the ocean, the soil is nutrient-poor and water deficient, with high pH and it is highly salinized. 35 The community of ectomycorrhizal fungi, as well as plant symbionts, are structured and maintained in part by all of these factors. 19 Its vegetation is geologically young and originates from other ecosystems (Atlantic Forest, Amazon, Cerrado and Caatinga), but it exhibits phenotypic variation when compared to the habitat of origin, making it a unique, extreme ecosystem that requires specific adaptations and a high level of ecological plasticity. 36 As a result, the restinga diversity pattern varies greatly across its geographic range. 37

Restinga cover approximately 80% of the Brazilian coast, the equivalent to 7,360 Km in length, spanning all coastal states ( Figure 1). 23 In addition to providing habitat and refuge for many species for at least part of their life cycles, the restinga stores rainwater and assists in flood control and water cycle regulation. 25

Figure 1. Map of restinga extension (in black) along the Brazilian Atlantic coast.

Figure 1.

Collecting site and fungal sampling

Collections were made between October 2017 and May 2019 in three restinga areas in Florianópolis, Brazil: Parque Natural Municipal das Dunas da Lagoa da Conceição (-27.694028, -48.506587), Monumento Natural Municipal da Lagoa do Peri (-27.728243, -48.510175) and Parque Natural Municipal da Lagoa do Jacaré das Dunas do Santinho (-27.467783, -48.393395). The basidiomata were photographed in the field and identified by comparing them with the morphology described in the literature and by using DNA barcoding of the ITS region. Fungal species names were inspected in Index Fungorum (RRID:SCR_008975) and MycoBank (RRID:SCR_004950) for nomenclatural and taxonomic synonyms, and current names were adopted. After making morpho-anatomical analyses, the basidiomata were dried at 40 °C for further preservation. The identification of the plant was made by a botanist and confirmed by sequence similarity of the ITS region [ 38 Caddah personal communication].

For ECM, soil samples (approximately 20 cm 3) were collected below the basidiomata and left in water overnight. The roots were washed and carefully selected under a stereomicroscope. The roots that had an ectomycorrhizal mantle were morphotyped following the standard methodology and terminology used for studying ECM. 39 From each root system with a mantle, several tips were transferred to 70% alcohol and stored at -20 °C for subsequent DNA extraction. Also, part of the root system with the mantle was fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde for morpho-anatomical analyses. Voucher material of the basidiomata, ECM and the host plant are deposited in the FLOR herbarium and fungarium and the permanent collection of the mycology laboratory (Micolab) at the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.

Molecular identification of the fungi

Genomic DNA was extracted from the basidiomata using a PowerPlant®Pro DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc.), following the manufacturer's protocol adapted for fungi. The internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal nuclear DNA (nrITS) region was amplified using the primers ITS1F and ITS4 40 and the following cycling parameters: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min; 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 55 °C and 1 min at 72 °C; and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. A direct PCR approach was applied to amplify the ITS region from the ECM tips isolated from soil samples 41 using the same pair of primers (ITS1F/ITS4). A total of 2 ml of 20 mg/ml Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) solution was added to each reaction tube to prevent PCR inhibition. The parameters applied to the PCR cycles followed Leonardi et al. 42 To identify the host plant, plant DNA was extracted from the ECM root tips using an isolation kit (see above), and the ITS region for the plant was amplified using the ITS-u1 and ITS-u4 primer pair 38 and the following cycle parameters: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min; 34 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 40 s at 55 °C and 1 min at 72 °C; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The DNA extracted from Guapira opposita leaves was used as a positive control. Sanger sequencing was performed with a BigDye Terminator 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) at the company Myleus Biotecnologia, in Minas Gerais, Brazil, following the manufacturer’s instructions and using the same primers cited above for the correspondent symbionts. New sequences generated during this work were included in GenBank 43 and the accession numbers for the sequences are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Ectomycorrhizal fungi reported to be associated with restinga ecosystems.

Report of naturally occurring ectomycorrhizal fungi, potential host and/or sequence isolated from basidiomata or roots. All other records are about basidiomata collections, if not specified otherwise. Asterisk (*) refers to potential hosts which have not been confirmed. For names of fungal taxa and synonymy, we followed Index Fungorum ( http://www.indexfungorum.org/) and MycoBank ( http://www.mycobank.org).

Species Host Reference Accession number
Amanita coacta Bas Psydium sp. and Ocotea sp.* 82 -
Guapira opposita* This study -
Amanita crebresulcata Bas Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Mimosaceae* 80 -
- 81 -
Guapira opposita* This study -
Amanita lilloi Singer Ficus sp.* 113 -
Amanita petalinovolva Wartchow Myrtaceae* 88 -
Amanita psammolimbata Wartchow & Sulzbacher Coccoloba sp.* 114 -
Amanita sp. (FLOR61395) - 115 KY769843
Amanita sp. (FLOR61397) - 115 KY769853
Amanita sp. (FLOR61398) - 115 KY769858
Amanita viscidolutea Menolli, Capelari & Baseia Coccoloba sp.* 85 -
Guapira opposita 33 MW000472; MW000473
Guapira opposita 33 (ECM) MW000471
Guapira opposita This study -
- 14 -
Astraeus hygrometricus (Pers.) Morgan Chloroleucon foliolosum* 116 -
Austroboletus festivus (Singer) Wolfe Guapira opposita This study -
Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819290
- 110 KY888002; KY888001; KY888000; KY887999; KY887998; KY886203; KY886202
Boletellus cremeovelosus A. Barbosa-Silva & Wartchow Coccoloba spp.* 77 -
Boletellus nordestinus A.C. Magnago Myrtaceae, Coccoloba spp.* 75 MG760443; MG760444; MG760442
Boletinellus rompelii (Pat. & Rick) Watling - 117 -
- 118 -
Brasilioporus olivaceoflavidus A.C. Magnago Coccoloba, Guapira, Pisonia* 74 NG088318; OM068900; OM068913; OM068904; OM160556; OM160566; OM068912; OM068903; OM160555; OM160565; OM160576
Brasilioporus simoniarum A.C. Magnago Guapira spp. * 74 OM068914; OM068905; OM160557; OM160567; OM160577; NG088319
Cantharellus aurantioconspicuus Wartchow & Buyck - 92 -
Cantharellus guyanensis Mont. Nyctaginaceae, Poligonaceae* 91 -
- 115 KY769833
Cantharellus protectus Wartchow & F.G.B. Pinheiro Coccoloba sp.* 119 -
Clavulina amazonensis Corner - 120 -
Clavulina incrustata Wartchow Coccoloba sp.* 99 -
Clavulina incrustata as C. paraincrustata Meiras-Ottoni & Gibertoni - 100 KX811201; KX811196
Clavulina junduensis L.M. Ferst, A.N.M. Furtado & M.A. Neves Guapira opposita* 94 MZ092867; MZ092866
Guapira opposita* This study -
Clavulina puigarii (Speg.) Corner - 79 -
Coltricia focicola (Berk & M.A. Curtis) Murrill - 121 -
Coltricia permollis Baltazar & Gibertoni - 121 -
- 122 -
Coltriciella oblectabilis (Lloyd) Kotl., Pouzar & Ryvarden - 79 -
Craterellus niger Sá, Pinheiro & Wartchow - 123 -
Entoloma aripoanum Dennis - 124 -
Entoloma luteosplendidum E. Horak & Cheype - 71 -
Entoloma tucuchense Dennis - 124 -
Fistulinella ruschii A.C. Magnago Fabaceae* 125 KY886206; KY888006
- 126 -
Gloeocantharellus aculeatus Linhares, P.P. Daniëls & M.A. Neves - 127 KU884897; KU884889; KU884896; KU884888; KU884895; KU884887
Gloeocantharellus substramineus Wartchow Myrtaceae, Rubiaceae, Poaceae, Euphorbiaceae* 128 -
Gymnopus atlanticus V. Coimbra & Wartchow - 73 KT222654; KT222659
Gymnopus montagnei (Berk.) Redhead - 73 KT222652; KT222653
Gymnopus talisiae V. Coimbra & Wartchow - 73 KT222655; KT222656; KT222657; KT222658
Hydnum villipes Lloyd - 129 -
Hydnum pulcherrimum Berk. & M.A. Curtis - 129 -
Hydropus griseolazulins F.G.B. Pinheiro, Sá & Wartchow Myrtaceae, Rubiaceae, Poaceae, Euphorbiaceae* 72 -
Hysterangium atlanticum Sulzbacher, Grebenc, Baseia et Nouhra Coccoloba alnifolia and Coccoloba laevis 32 LT623206; LT623204; LT623205; LT635647; LT635648; LT635645; LT635646
Coccoloba alnifolia and Coccoloba laevis 32 (ECM) LT623210; LT623207; LT623208
Inocybe sp. Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819291
Lactifluus batistae Wartchow, J.L. Bezerra & M. Cavalc. Fabaceae subfam. Caesalpinoideae* 130 -
Lactifluus dunensis Sá & Wartchow - 131 -
Lactifluus neotropicus (Singer) Nuytinck - 132 MK937543; MK937563; MK937544; MK937564; KY769840;
Lactifluus venosellus Silva-Filho, Sá & Wartchow Polygonaceae and Fabaceae* 133 MK929292
Longistriata flava Sulzbacher, Orihara, Grebenc, M.P. Martín & Baseia Coccoloba alnifolia, C. laevis and Guapira* 67 LT574840; LT574842; LT574844; LT574839
Nevesoporus nigrostipitatus A.C. Magnago Coccoloba and Guapira* 74 OM068918; OM068910; OM160562; OM068919; OM068911
Phlebopus beniensis (Singer & Digilo) Heinem. & Rammeloo - 134 -
- 135 -
Phlebopus brasiliensis Singer Coccoloba laevis* 136 -
Phlebopus portentosus (Berk. & Broome) Boidjin - 118 -
Restingomyces reticulatus Sulzbacher, B.T. Goto & Baseia Caesalpinia echinata, Lafoensia pacari and Eugenia luschnathiana* 137 LT009410; LT009408; LT009409; LT009411; LT009412
Russula pluvialis Singer Dicotiledoneas* 48 , 138 -
Russula puiggarii (Speg.) Singer - 115 KY769834; KY769837
Guapira opposita* 34 -
Guapira opposita* This study -
Sebacina aureomagnifica Wartchow, Sulzbacher &Ovrebo Coccoloba alnifolia and Coccoloba laevis* 139 LN868949; LN868950
Thelephora palmata (Scop.) Fr. - 79 -
Thelephora sp.1 Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819292
Tomentella sp.1 Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819288
Tomentella sp.2 Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819289
Tomentella sp.3 Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819293
Tomentella sp.4 Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819286
Tomentella sp.5 Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819287
Tomentella sp. 6 Guapira opposita This study (ECM) OP819294
Trechispora brasiliensis (Corner) K.H. Larss. - 140 -
Trechispora copiosa Meiras-Ottoni & Gibertoni - 141 MN701013; MN687971
Trechispora regularis (Murrill) Liberta - 140 MT406381; MH279999
Trechispora thelephora (Lév.) Ryvarden Guapira opposita* 34 (ECM) KY769825; KY769820
Trechispora thelephora Guapira opposita* 34 KY769868
Tylopilus aquarius var. megistus - 77 -
Tylopilus dunensis A.C. Magnago & M.A. Neves - 142 MF113419; MF113428; MF113418; MF113420
Tylopilus nigripes A. Barbosa-Silva & Wartchow Coccoloba sp.* 143 -
Tylopilus sp. - 142 MF113424; MF113432; MF113425; MF113426; MF113427
Xerocomus hypoxanthus Singer - 144 -
Xerocomus sp. - 144 -

Developing the record list

The data provided here on the relationship between restinga plants and ectomycorrhizal fungi are mainly based on field observations reports. Personal observations and information collected from a wide range of published and platform sources are included in the data source. The Brazilian fungaria collections (through SpeciesLink network) and available literature databases (e.g., Scopus (RRID:SCR 022559), PubMed (RRID:SCR 004846), ISI Web of Science (RRID:SCR 022706), ResearchGate (RRID:SCR 006505)) were searched for records on potential restinga host plants and related mycobionts. Only species belonging to fungal genera for which the ectomycorrhizal status has been proved or is considered likely were considered for listing. 8 , 11 , 44 Listed sequences of restinga ECM fungi ( Table 1) are those reported in relevant publications and were retrieved from either GenBank or UNITE. Some of the punctual ectomycorrhizal records were based only on the presence of the sporome next to a known plant symbiont, without any direct confirmation of the presence of ectomycorrhiza. As a result, these data are susceptible to non-measurable errors, particularly when more than one potentially ectomycorrhizal plant is in the environment. Despite our efforts to scan as many bibliographic sources as possible, our survey may be partial and incomplete.

Results and Discussion

Ectomycorrhizae in the Neotropics: a different story

Rolf Singer, a true pioneer in the study of mycorrhiza biology in South America, once wrote that he believed three ‘ectotrophic regions’ did exist in the continent, each one characterized by a single host plant genus. In a seminal work for the field, he listed the Quercus humboldtii area in Colombia, the ecosystem formed by Alnus jorullensis in the Andes and, more extensively, the Nothofagus region in Chile and Argentina. 45 Beyond these areas, Singer stated, ectomycorrhizal symbiosis in South America was restricted to plantations of imported trees, in particular Pinus. 46 However, as his knowledge of various types of forests in temperate and tropical South America improved, Singer expanded his view. “Our own recent investigation in the Lower Rio Negro region of Central Amazonia show, that certain vegetation types (campina, campinarana, igapó) are rich in ectomycorrhiza-forming fungi, e.g., Boletaceae … Thus, in both hemispheres, certain tropical soils require for the formation of any kind of forest the presence of ectomycorrhiza,” Singer remarked in 1979. 47 , 48

Since Singer’s times, our understanding of the distribution, relevance and role of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis in many ecological settings in temperate, tropical and subtropical South America has grown considerably, but not so rapidly as one could have expected given the premises. Indeed, while Singer and colleagues just supposed the ectomycorrhizal status of many fungal species and relevant host plants on the basis of field observations, detailed studies able to identify and describe fungal structures on the roots of ectotrophic plants in most South American ecosystems began only in the last decade of the twentieth century, i.e., considerably later than in the Northern Hemisphere. 49 According to the recent account of the currently known biogeographic pattern of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis in South America by Nouhra and colleagues, 49 three main regions can be recognized, broadly confirming Singer’s vision but also elaborating on it: 1) the Northern Andean cordillera, with mostly temperate forests, where ECM such as Quercus, Colombobalanus, Alnus and Salix occur; 2) the sub Antarctic forests in far Southern America, dominated by ectomycorrhizal trees in the Nothofagaceae ( Fuscospora, Lophozonia and Nothofagus); the Guiana Shield region and the coastal vegetation of the Atlantic rainforests of Brazil, where a large (and fast growing) number of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the/cortinarius, /russula-lactarius, /amanita and/clavulina lineages have been spotted in recent times with their associated host plants, including Dicymbe, Aldina ( Fabaceae), Pseudomonotes ( Dipterocarpaceae), Pakaraimaea ( Cistaceae), Coccoloba ( Polygonaceae), Gnetum ( Gnetaceae), Pisonia, Neea, and Guapira ( Nyctaginaceae). And is here that our story becomes more specific and very personal, as outlined below.

Restinga mycorrhizae: more than it meets the eye

Mycorrhizal symbiosis plays a crucial role in basically each and every terrestrial ecosystem, 3 and restinga are not an exception. For many years, however, this peculiar coastal habitat has been the object of studies delving exclusively into the communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their plant relationships, while almost no attention whatsoever has been devoted to the ectomycorrhizal component. We thus started investigating the spread, diversity and ecology of the ECM-fungal contingent, not only by recording the occurrence of sporomata of supposedly ectomycorrhizal macrofungi, but also looking directly at the roots and the structures therein. What we found was surprising, indeed. Working mainly at a restinga in the Parque Natural Municipal das Dunas da Lagoa da Conceição in Florianópolis, Brazil, we rapidly understood that Guapira opposita (Vell.) Reitz. is a hub for local ectomycorrhizal community, hosting a range of fungal species on its roots. Out of a total of 29 morphotypes collected from soil samples, 10 were found associated with G. opposita roots, all corresponding to Basidiomycota taxa, based on molecular barcoding. 50 The best represented clade was/tomentella-thelephora, with Tomentella bursting six species ( Table 1); of note, two macrofungi native species from the restinga of the Atlantic Forest, namely Amanita viscidolutea and Austroboletus festivus, besides occurring as basidiomata were also found associated to G. opposita roots in our survey ( Table 1). 50 The most striking characteristics of Guapira ECMs, however, remain with their morpho-anatomical features, that make them rather unique. The short, simple or long, thin branched ectomycorrhizal systems, close connections between the layered mantle and the cortical cells, absence of a Hartig net or other fungal elements in the cortex are diagnostic characteristics that make the Guapira ECMs we observed rather unique, to the point that we proposed the term ‘Guapirioid’ to distinguish them from the other known ectomycorrhizal types ( Figure 2). 33 , 50 Our study on the ectomycorrhiza of A. viscidolutea on G. opposita has been the first detailed morpho-anatomical and molecular characterization of a naturally occurring mycorrhiza associated with a native plant host in restinga forest in South America. 33 Besides G. opposita, we can also find members of the following potential ectomycorrhizal families growing in restinga: Fabaceae, Moraceae, Myrtaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Polygonaceae, and Salicaceae. 51

Figure 2. Ectomycorrhizal morphotypes associated with Guapira opposita roots in the restinga from South Brazil.

Figure 2.

(a) Amanita viscidolutea; (b) Austroboletus festivus; (c) Inocybe sp.; (d) Thelephora sp1.; (e) Tomentella sp1. and Tomentella sp2.; (f) Tomentella sp3.; (g) Tomentella sp4.; (h) Tomentella sp5.; (i) Tomentella sp6.

As mentioned above, representatives of/tomentella-thelephora clade were the most frequently encountered taxa in our restinga surveys, a finding in line with studies based on root and soil analysis that revealed that the/tomentella–thelephora clade is diverse and dominant in neotropical habitats, 52 , 53 although they are generally undersampled due to their inconspicuous basidiomata, which makes it difficult to identify the sampled taxon. It is known that members of Nyctaginaceae establish ectomycorrhizal associations with a low ECM fungal diversity in the Neotropics. 19 , 54 The mycorrhizal status of the family seems to be not homogeneous, with several species confirmed as dual-mycorrhizal 55 , 56 and many others believed to be non-mycorrhizal. 7 , 57 Moreover, some of the mycorrhizal structures observed in Nyctaginaceae escape classical classification. In the so-called ‘Pisonioid’ mycorrhizae of Pisonia, Hartig net is poorly or not developed, and instead ‘transfer cells’ are observable in the epidermis and cortex of the host root. 58 , 59 Haug et al., 60 and Álvarez-Manjarrez et al., 61 observed Tomentella/Thelephora and Membranomyces ectomycorrhizae associated with Guapira roots in Ecuador and Mexico, respectively. In both cases, they pointed to the presence of intraradical hyphae in the roots and the possibility of Guapira species forming a type of ectendomycorrhiza. On the basis of their work on the ectomycorrhizal types of Nyctaginaceae genera Neea and Pisonia in South Ecuador, Haug and colleagues 54 concluded that the set of observed characters (the combination of long root systems that are only partly transformed into ectomycorrhizae, with root hair formation that is not suppressed, occasional intracellular penetration of hyphae, and sporadic formation of transfer cell-like structures) may suggest that Nyctaginaceae represent an early step in the evolutionary change from arbuscular mycorrhization to ectomycorrhization. The ectomycorrhizal morphotypes we observed on G. opposita do not present the intraradical hyphae arrangement observed in other Nyctaginaceae. However, the absence of Hartig net recorded in our study is another indication of the plasticity and peculiarity of mycorrhizal biology of this host plant family. Of note, besides in Pisonia, the absence of Hartig net has been reported in the case of Tremelloscypha sp. and Sebacina sp. ectomycorrhizae on the roots of Achatocarpus gracilis Walter ( Achatocarpaceae, Caryophyllales) in a neotropical dry forest in Mexico. 61 Overall, this evidence points out the significance of Caryophyllales (that include the Nyctaginaceae) as mycorrhizal hosts in a variety of neotropical ecosystems, and the necessity to study the peculiar ectomycorrhizal associations and the role of ECM symbiosis in the Neotropics more thoroughly. 62 As for G. opposita, further work is currently underway in our lab, through in vitro synthesis of ECMs with selected mycobionts, to ascertain whether the formation of Guapirioid ECMs depends on the plant host, the fungal partner, or both.

“In this ecosystem where plants need to constantly deal with various environmental stresses, the symbiotic association of plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is one of the main strategies for their survival, due to the ability of external fungal hyphae to absorb the scarce nutrients and water from the substrate, as well as hyphae contributing to soil aggregation … .and salinity tolerance,” noted da Silva and co-workers discussing the important ecological role played by AMF in restinga. 63 A host of studies conducted in the restinga across Brazil since the 1990s have indeed revealed many details of the AMF communities in these ecosystems, revealing that most of coastal dune plants investigated were associated with arbuscular mycorrhiza and that restinga AMF are significantly diverse. 64 , 65 In this context, it is relevant to note that Guapira—and likely other restinga host plants beyond is a dual-mycorrhizal species, capable of hosting both arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal associations. 66 Several ectomycorrhizal hosts share this feature, including Eucalyptus, Alnus, Populus, Salix and members of the Cistaceae. 56 They are typically plants that can survive in environments that are subject to severe disruptions like natural fire or even human activity, as well as soils deficient in nutrients. The benefits of dual-mycorrhizal colonization thus stretch from plants with increased rates of survival, growth, and nutrient absorption to environments, promoting establishment and increasing survival on unfavorable locations of linked AM/ECM plants. All these considerations fit potentially well with restinga characteristics.

Restinga ectomycorrhizal fungi: connecting the dots

Our attempts to assess the diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with restinga, both through direct field sampling and by surveying records in the literature and in national fungaria, revealed 726 entries (Table 1S, which can be found as Underlying data 23 ). A total of 74 of these correspond to putative ectomycorrhizal taxa specifically associated with restinga, mostly derived from recent dedicated research and our own data ( Table 1). A total of 14 different taxa were recorded in our fieldwork in restinga fragments in southern Brazil; all are reported for the first time as linked to Guapira opposita. Several important ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa are represented in the list, with Boletaceae (15 spp.), Amanita (9 spp.), Tomentella/ Thelephora (8 spp.), Russula/ Lactifluus (7 spp.), and Clavulina (4 spp.). Three taxa of hypogeous fungi were recorded in the restinga, including the recently described Longistriata flava Sulzbacher, Orihara, Grebenc, M.P. Martín & Baseia, possibly associated with Coccoloba and Guapira spp. 67

Throughout our investigation, we isolated 10 distinct morphotypes from restinga fragments using random soil sampling ( Table 1). Basidiomata of equivalent species were also collected in two cases ( Amanita viscidolutea and Austroboletus festivus). Another eight species were collected only in association with host roots ( Inocybe sp., Thelephora sp. and six unknown species of Tomentella). The high frequency of Thelephoraceae representatives as fungal partners is remarkable in our data, as well as in other studies. 52 , 68 It is widely recognized that many species in this family are saprotrophs, however, it is possible that ectomycorrhizal species also occupy niches as saprotrophs to survive periods when they are not associated with the plant symbiont. 69 Previous studies indicate that many thelephoroid fungi associated with members of the Pisonieae tribe ( Guapira, Neea and Pisonia, except P. grandis) are generalists, as all telephoroid fungi found associated with members of Pisonieae were also found associated with other plant symbionts. 68 , 70 Ectomycorrhizal plants of the Polygonaceae, Caesalpiniaceae and Fabaceae families often occur in the same regions as the Pisonieae species, such that symbiosis in these species should also be examined. 68 70

Species of Entoloma, Gymnopus, Hydropus, and Phlebopus have been mentioned as ectomycorrhizal, 12 possibly associated with Myrtaceae, Leguminosae, Rubiaceae, Polygonaceae, and Euphorbiaceae in the restinga. 71 74 These putative ectomycorrhizal lineages, however, are not concentrated in specific clades neither form monophyletic groups of ectomycorrhizal isolates, 12 in such a way that their true ectomycorrhizal status must be confirmed. The genus Boletus is not recorded from Brazil (except from exotic plantations) but several Tylopilus, Xerocomus and Phlebopus species were originally deposited under the name Boletus sp. Taking this into account, we considered for listing records of Boletus sp. only from natural habitats.

Restinga mycohighlights

During our survey, we unearthed notable records of ectomycorrhiza-forming fungi occurring in the restinga that deserve special mention and additional notes ( Figure 3). As shown in Table 1, several boletoid taxa have been described as being associated with restinga, such as Boletellus nordestinus (MycoBank MB823951) ( Figure 3a). This species has been recently described from material collected in sandy soils in the northeast of Brazil, in the states of Paraíba and Rio Grande do Norte. 75 Although only found in two locations, it is expected that this species occurs in other restinga fragments along the Brazilian Atlantic coast. However, extensive searches in southern Brazil have been conducted, and the lack of records in these areas may indicate that this is a rare species [Altielys Magnago, personal communication]. Boletellus nordestinus can be distinguished from its closely related Boletellus chrysenteroides (Snell) Snell by its dry, velutinous, chocolate brown pileus, smaller basidiospores longitudinally ridged, dichotomously forked. 75 Also B. chrysenteroides is a North-American species that associates with oaks and hemlocks and grows in an unusual environment for boletus, in the midst of decayed wood. 76 Although the ECM hosts of B. nordestinus are unknown, specimens have been observed growing near confirmed ectomycorrhizal host plants: Coccoloba alnifolia Casar., C. laevis Casar. (Polygonaceae) and Myrtaceae species. 5 Currently, only four species of the genus are known from Brazil: Boletellus ananas var. minor Singer, B. annas var. crassotunicatus Singer have been described for the Amazon 48 ; B. cremeovelosus Barbosa-Silva & Wartchow 77 and B. nordestinus have been described for the Atlantic Forest. 75

Figure 3. Basidiomata of selected species discussed in the text.

Figure 3.

(a) Boletellus nordestinus; (b) Amanita crebresulcata; (c) Amanita coacta; (d) Amanita viscidolutea; (e) Cantharellus guyanensis; (f) Clavulina junduensis; (g) Clavulina incrustata; (h) Brasilioporus olivaceoflavidus; (i) Brasilioporus simoniarum; (j) Nevesoporus nigrostipitatus. Photo credits (a) Eduardo Fazolino; (h; j) Altielys C. Magnago; (i) Juli Simon.

Amanita crebresulcata (MycoBank MB308549) ( Figure 3b), Amanita coacta (MycoBank MB308546) ( Figure 3c) and Amanita viscidolutea (MycoBank MB514222) ( Figure 3d) were also noteworthy findings from our survey. The first two are Vaginatae sect. members with a patchy distribution, with A. crebresulcata found in the states of Amazonas, Mato Grosso (in the Brazilian Amazon), Paraíba, Paraná, Pernambuco and Santa Catarina (in the coastal Atlantic Forest), 78 82 and A. coacta found in Amazonas, São Paulo and Santa Catarina [ 78 , 82 , 83 as A. crebresulcata]. These records, however, may not reflect the true distribution of taxa in the country, as several regions remain under-sampled, and species records are based on specialists' areas of expertise. 82 Despite their macromorphological similarity, A. coacta is mainly characterized by having a felted submembranous volva, and the presence of a transverse belt-like portion of the volva that detaches from the saccade portion attached to the base of the stipe as it increases in length. 84 Amanita crebresulcata, on the other hand, has a thin saccade volva that usually breaks at the apex and leaves no remnants on top of the stipe. 78 Amanita viscidolutea was one of the most frequent fungi found during our field trips. Basidiomata of the species are vibrant yellow with slightly striated white pileus margin and the exannulate stipe. 85 The taxon belongs to the well-supported sect. Amanita, 86 reported to group important ectomycorrhizal taxa such as Amanita muscaria (L.) Lam. and Amanita pantherina (DC.) Krombh. 87 The species is known from restinga areas in the coastal Atlantic Forest from Rio Grande do Norte, where it was originally described, 84 Paraíba 88 and Santa Catarina. 33 Although it is usually found in relatively large populations, A. viscidolutea is a rare species and it grows in a specific type of vegetation that has been threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation by human population growth and expansion, along the Brazilian coast. 25 Using transmission electron microscopy, we recently described the morpho-anatomical characteristics of the ectomycorrhiza formed between A. viscidolutea and Guapira opposita roots; both partners were identified from the ectomycorrhizal root tips through molecular analyzes. 33

Cantharellus guyanensis (MycoBank MB240517) ( Figure 3e) is a widespread species that was discovered in lowland forest in French Guiana. 89 Surprisingly, the species has gone nearly a century without being recorded since Montagne proposed it. However, studies of ectomycorrhizal fungi in neotropical ecosystems have revealed that the species ranges from southern Brazil to northern Colombia. 90 , 91 Despite some minor morphological differences between the recorded specimens of C. guyanensis and the type specimen, they agree on the relevant character set. Its wide geographical distribution appears to reflect the wide variety of host plants. It can be found associated with monodominant forests of Dicymbe or Aldina spp. in Guyana; or multidiverse ectotrophic forests in spatial proximity to Coccoloba, Guapira, and Neea species in French Guiana, Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil (in the restinga). 92 , 93 Singer et al. 48 discovered C. guyanensis in the Brazilian Amazon in the 1980s, possibly associated with Aldina species as well as Glycoxylon inophyllum (Mart. ex Miq.) Ducke. Basidiomata of this species are solitary, abundant, visible only for a short period of time (for a month or so), 91 have an orange yellow to orange pileus, a hymenophore clearly laminated or regularly folded at all stages of growth and the presence of purplish tints in its predominantly orange pileus. 90

Considering all the Clavulina described for the restinga, Clavulina junduensis (MycoBank MB839651) ( Figure 3f) deserves attention. The species is characterized by the coralloid, branched, purplish grey basidiomata with brownish orange stipe; hyaline, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid basidiospores and abundant gloepleurous hyphae with refringent content and swelling bulbs. 94 Basidiomata of C. junduensis are frequently found in restinga fragments in southern Brazil but have been misidentified as Clavulina cinerea (Bull.) J. Schröt. for the past years. 94 97 However, considering that specimens with dark gray coloration do not group in a single clade in the phylogenies, studies suggest C. cinerea represents a species complex and more than one species with gray coloration is subsumed under this name. 98 Although we are still working on identifying the host, based on field observations, C. junduensis is possibly associated with G. opposita, which is the most common symbiont in restinga fragments in southern Brazil. 33 Another species associated with the restinga that also deserves a mention is Clavulina incrustata Wartchow (MycoBank MB561193) ( Figure 3g). The taxon was described by Wartchow 99 based on material collected in the Atlantic Forest from Pernambuco and it is the first species of Clavulina with incrusted hyphae. The presence of crystals in the specimens represents a character of taxonomic significance within the genus, and despite being microscopically identical, Tibpromma and colleagues 100 proposed Clavulina paraincrustata Meiras-Ottoni & Gibertoni to differentiate from specimens of C. incrustata with a less robust and pale basidiomata, with amphigenous hymenium. By the time of the publication, the DNA of the type specimen was tentatively extracted, but with no success. 100 However, the researchers recognized that the characters used to describe the new species have low taxonomic significance and, based on new phylogenetic analyzes, they proved to be the same species and synonymization of the names is expected [Angelina Meiras-Ottoni, personal communication]. According to the available data, Clavulina is an ancestrally tropical lineage, 101 , 102 and, although the genus can be found in a variety of ecosystems, it has been shown it is especially diverse in South America, where many new species have been recently described. 11 , 103 , 104

It is known that over the years and with the expansion of molecular phylogenetic analyzes of Boletaceae, the family has undergone several re-circumscriptions, with the rescue of some taxa and the segregation of others, 105 , 106 as in the case of the two newly proposed genera, Brasilioporus and Nevesoporus. 74 Brasilioporus olivaceoflavidus (MycoBank MB836726) ( Figure 3h), the type species of the genus, was collected in the coastal Atlantic Forest of the state of Espírito Santo, but it has also been recorded for the state of Santa Catarina, in restinga fragments. 74 This species has tiny basidiomata, a pileus with fibrils and olive-green scales on a yellowish background, and a blackish hymenophore when injured. It grows solitary and in small groups, or gregarious on sandy soil in the vicinity of ectomycorrhizal Coccoloba, Guapira, and Pisonia species. Brasilioporus simoniarum (MycoBank MB836727) ( Figure 3i) is a Brazilian species phylogenetically close to it. This species has been described as growing clustered in groups of three basidiomata on restinga sandy soil, in vicinity of Guapira spp. and it is known only from the type locality in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest on Florianópolis Island. 74 Different from B. olivaceoflavidus, Brasilioporus simoniarum have distinguished purplish black basidiomata, fibrillose to squamulose pileus, whitish hymenophore mottled orange-red and gradually turning black and subreticulate/sublacunose stipe. A beautiful, although discreet, species associated with restinga is Nevesoporus nigrostipitatus (MycoBank MB838704) ( Figure 3j), characterized by the small, basidiomata, with pinkish brown velvety pileus, pinkish tubes that are slightly depressed around the stipe and unchanging where bruised, and slender, dark gray to blackish stipe. 74 Although the species has only been found in the type locality, Espírito Santo, and Paraíba, it is expected to be found along the entire coast of the Atlantic Forest. In situ, Nevesoporus nigrostipitatus grows gregariously in small groups on sandy soil near species of Coccoloba and Guapira.

Conservation issues

Despite their obvious relevance for understanding nature and ecosystem change, fungi have traditionally been neglected in biodiversity conservation. However, a number of initiatives and studies have raised general attention toward the status of fungal populations across the world, increasing awareness and spurring protection actions dedicated to fungi. 107 , 108 Restinga makes no exception, and together with the observation and description of its fungal diversity, it comes the assessment of the conservation status of several ectomycorrhizal taxa. A. viscidolutea, for example, has been reported from a handful of sites, although it is likely to be more widespread. A population decline of between 30% and 50% within the last three generations (50 years) has been suspected, based on the severe habitat decline in the area, justifying its conservation assessment as ‘Vulnerable’ following the IUCN criteria. 109 Another species determined as Vulnerable is A. festivus. 110 , 111 Known from the coastal Atlantic Forest of Brazil (Pernambuco, Paraná and Santa Catarina states), A. festivus occurs solitary to scattered in white sandy soil under trees in restinga. “There is concern over a decline of the habitat considering the restinga areas, as they are small highly fragmented patches open to recreational activities and tourism and there are no strict laws that restrict the use of these areas. Also, the areas in southern and north-eastern Brazil have been impacted by urban growth, threatening the last remnants of Atlantic Coast restingas. Invasion by non-native pine ( Pinus elliottii) is another threat,” reads the original description of the threats menacing this species. 111 Devising measures to efficiently protect threatened fungal restinga species is not a trivial matter. Generally speaking, protection of habitats where endangered macrofungi are found is pivotal for the conservation of these key microorganisms. To this aim, curbing the spread of invasive non-native species and avoiding excessive human exploitation of coastal areas are key conservation actions, especially when coupled to sound data on the distribution and population size of the macrofungi object of protection.

Conclusions

Restinga mycorrhizal biology and ecology is under the spotlight, but clearly, we are just scratching the surface. Identity of host plants, host-specificity of associated mycobionts and patterns of shared mycorrhizal networks among host plants, the role played by dual mycorrhizal symbiosis, are only a few of the many aspects that demand further investigation. 112 Besides enhancing our basic understanding of restinga as an ecosystem, casting light on these issues would also have practical consequences. Identifying symbionts and their effects on ecosystems, for example, will enable the development of conservation and restoration strategies for the restinga. Hopefully, this and other works will increase the awareness of researchers, providing us in the near future with fresh data coming from both fungal and botanical forays, aimed at describing the diversity of ECM fungi and associated plant ecology in restinga. Also, well-planned molecular studies examining mycorrhizal specificity at the root tip scale are bound to disclose many details of the structure and dynamics of restinga ectomycorrhizal communities.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conceptualization and design of the work, drafting the work and critically reviewing it for important intellectual content, as well as all authors approved the final version for publication. ANMF, MAN and ACR supervised the planning and execution of the research, including external guidance from the core team. ANMF annotated and curated the data for its initial use and later reuse, checking the overall reproducibility of the results. ANMF, ML and OC conducted phylogenetic analysis and morphological observations. MAN, ACR, ML and OC provided study materials and all other resources used as analysis tools. ACR, OC and ML secured financial support for the project that gave rise to this publication. All authors directed and coordinated the planning and execution of the research activity.

Acknowledgments

This article is a part of the PhD thesis of A.N.M.F. The authors thank LAMEB (UFSC, Brazil) for the support during the molecular work. We also thank the following: Dr. Mayara K. Caddah (UFSC, Brazil) for helping identify Guapira opposita; Dr. Savio T. Farias for helping during field expeditions; and those at the FLOR herbarium and fungarium (UFSC, Brazil) for the support. Thanks to Eduardo Fazolino, Altielys C. Magnago and Juli Simon for the photographs of Boletellus nordestinus, Brasilioporus olivaceoflavidus, Nevesoporus nigrostipitatus and Brasilioporus simoniarum. The first author was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brazil – Finance Code 001 (CAPES-DS and PDSE fellowship grants).

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Data availability

Underlying data

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M30R173. Accession number OP819286; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819286. 145

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M34R198. Accession number OP819287; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819287. 146

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M36AR200a. Accession number OP819288; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819288. 147

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M36AR200b. Accession number OP819289; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819289. 148

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Austroboletus festivus isolate M41CR210. Accession number OP819290; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819290. 149

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Inocybe sp. isolate M51AR230. Accession number OP819291; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819291. 150

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Thelephoraceae isolate M53AR235. Accession number OP819292; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819292. 151

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M57BR248. Accession number OP819293; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819293. 152

GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M68AR291. Accession number OP819294; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819294. 153

Figshare: Collections of ectomycorrhizal fungi from restinga fragments on the Brazilian coast. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22196836. 23

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • Furtado ANM et al - @F1000 Res_Supplementary Table 1.xlsx.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

References

  • 1. Mougi A, Kondoh M: Diversity of interaction types and ecological community stability. Science. 2012;337:349–351. 10.1126/science.1220529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RS, Straalen NM: The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2008;11:296–310. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Smith SE, Read DJ: Mycorrhizal symbiosis. New York: Academic Press; 3° ed 2008;815. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bonfante P, Genre A: Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nat. Commun. 2010;1:48. 10.1038/ncomms1046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Põlme S, Bahram M, Jacquemy H, et al. : Host preference and network properties in biotrophic plant-fungal associations. New Phytol. 2017;217:1230–1239. 10.1111/nph.14895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Siqueira JO, Souza FA, Cardoso EJBN, et al. : Micorrizas: 30 anos de pesquisa no Brasil. Lavras: Editora UFLA;2010;716. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tedersoo L, Brundrett MC: Evolution of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis in plants. Tedersoo L, editor. Biogeography of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis). Cham: Springer;2017; vol230: pp.407–468. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Comandini O, Rinaldi AC, Kuyper TW: Measuring and estimating ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: a continuous challenge. Mycorrhiza: Occurrence in Natural and Restored Environments. Pagano M, editor. New York: Nova Science Publishers;2012; pp.165–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hawksworth DL, Lücking R: Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million Species. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5:5. 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0052-2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Tedersoo L, Suvi T, Beaver K, et al. : Ectomycorrhizal fungi of the Seychelles: diversity patterns and host shifts from the native Vateriopsis seychellarum ( Dipterocarpaceae) and Intsia bijuga ( Caesalpiniaceae) to the introduced Eucalyptus robusta (Myrtaceae), but not Pinus caribea ( Pinaceae). New Phytol. 2007;175:321–333. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02104.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tedersoo L, May TW, Smith ME: Ectomycorrhizal lifestyle in fungi: global diversity, distribution, and evolution of phylogenetic lineages. Mycorrhiza. 2010;20:217–263. 10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tedersoo L, Smith ME: Lineages of ectomycorrhizal fungi revisited: foraging strategies and novel lineages revealed by sequences from belowground. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2013;27:83–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sulzbacher MA, Giachini AJ, Grebenc T, et al. : A survey of an ectotrophic sand dune forest in the northeast Brazil. Mycosphere. 2013;4:1106–1116. 10.5943/mycosphere/4/6/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sulzbacher MA, Grebenc T, Jacques RJS, et al. : Ectomycorrhizal fungi from southern Brazil – a literature-based review, their origin and potential hosts. Mycosphere. 2013;4:61–95. 10.5943/mycosphere/4/1/5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Roy M, Schimann H, Braga-Neto R, et al. : Diversity and distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi from Amazonian lowland white-sand forests in Brazil and French Guiana. Biotropica. 2016;48:90–100. 10.1111/btp.12297 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Giachini A, Oliveira VL, Castellano MA, et al. : Ectomycorrhizal fungi in Eucalyptus and Pinus plantations in southern Brazil. Mycologia. 2000;92:1166–1177. 10.1080/00275514.2000.12061264 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Giachini A, Souza LAB, Oliveira VL: Species richness and seasonal abundance of ectomycorrhizal fungi in plantations of Eucalyptus dunnii and Pinus taeda in southern Brazil. Mycorrhiza. 2004;14:375–381. 10.1007/s00572-004-0297-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sobestiansky G: Contribution to a macromycete survey of the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina in Brazil. J. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2005;48:437–457. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Corrales A, Henkel TW, Smith ME: Ectomycorrhizal associations in the tropics-biogeography, diversity patterns and ecosystem roles. New Phytol. 2018;220:1076–1091. 10.1111/nph.15151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, et al. : Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853–858. 10.1038/35002501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pérez-Pazos E, Certano A, Gagne J, et al. : The slippery nature of ectomycorrhizal host specificity: Suillus fungi associated with novel pinoid ( Picea) and abietoid ( Abies) hosts. Mycologia. 2021;1–11. 10.1080/00275514.2021.1921525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. CRIA-Centro de Referência e Informação Ambiental 2021. Specieslink - simple search.[08 Mai 2021]. Reference Source
  • 23. Furtado ANM, Leonardi M, Comandini O, et al. : @F1000 Res_Supplementary Table 1.xlsx.[Dataset]. figshare. 2023. 10.6084/m9.figshare.22196836 [DOI]
  • 24. Magnago LFS, Martins SV, Schaefer CEGR, et al. : Restinga forests of the Brazilian coast: richness and abundance of tree species on different soils. Annals of BAS. 2012;84:807–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. SOS Mata Atlântica: Mata Atlântica. 2021. [20 July 2021]. Reference Source
  • 26. Weidlich EWA, Mioto PT, Furtado ANM, et al. : Using ectomycorrhizae to improve the restoration of neotropical coastal zones. Restor. Ecol. 2020;28:1324–1326. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Barto EK, Weidenhamer JD, Cipollini D, et al. : Fungal superhighways: do common mycorrhizal networks enhance belowground communication? Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:633–637. 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Pickles BJ, Simard SW: Mycorrhizal networks and forest resilience to drought. Mycorrhizal mediation of soil: fertility, structure, and carbon storage. Johnson NC, Gehring C, Jansa J, editors. New York: Elsevier;2017;526. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Asmelash F, Bekele T, Birhane E: The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the restoration of degraded lands. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Brown KS, Jr., Brown GG: Habitat alteration and species loss in Brazilian forests. Tropical deforestation and species extinction. Whitmore JH, Sayer JA.editors. London, England; Chapman and Hallo;1992; pp.142–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Zamith LR, Scarano FR: Restoration of restinga sandy coastal plain in Brazil: survival and growth of planted woody species. Restor. Ecol. 2006;14:87–94. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00108.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sulzbacher MA, Grebenc T, Nouhra ER, et al. : Hysterangium atlanticum sp. nov., forms ectomycorrhizae with Coccoloba species ( Polygonaceae) from the Atlantic rainforest of Northeastern Brazil. Symbiosis. 2019;78:275–286. 10.1007/s13199-019-00617-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Furtado ANM, Comandini O, Leonardi M, et al. : Facing the Brazilian restinga diversity: Amanita viscidolutea ectomycorrhiza on Guapira opposita. Mycoscience. 2022;63:73–78. 10.47371/mycosci.2022.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Vanegas León ML, Sulzbacher MA, Rinaldi AC, et al. : Are Trechisporales ectomycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal root endophytes? Mycol. Prog. 2019;18:1231–1240. 10.1007/s11557-019-01519-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Falkenberg DB: Aspectos da Flora e da vegetação secundária da restinga de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Insular. 1999;28:1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Fine PV, Garca-Villacorta R, Pitman NC, et al. : A floristic study of the white-sand forests of Peru. I. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2010;97:283–305. 10.3417/2008068 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Correia BEF, Almeida EB, Jr, Zanin M: Key points about North and Northern Brazilian restinga: a review of geomorphological characterization, phytophysiognomies classification and studies’ tendencies. Bot. Rev. 2020;86:329–337. 10.1007/s12229-020-09230-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cheng T, Xu C, Lei L, et al. : Barcoding the kingdom Plantae: new PCR primers for ITS regions of plants with improved universality and specificity. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2015;16:138–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Agerer R: Characterization of ectomycorrhiza. (eds) Methods in Microbiology. Techniques for the Study of Mycorrhiza. Norris JR, Read DJ, Varma AK, editors. San Diego: Academic Press;1991; Vol.23: pp25–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gardes M, Bruns TD: ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993;2:113–118. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Iotti M, Zambonelli A: A quick and precise technique for identifying ectomycorrhizae by PCR. Mycol. Res. 2006;110:60–65. 10.1016/j.mycres.2005.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Leonardi M, Iotti M, Oddis M, et al. : Assessment of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in the natural habitats of Tuber magnatum ( Ascomycota, Pezizales). Mycorrhiza. 2013;23:349–358. 10.1007/s00572-012-0474-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, et al. : Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D5–D15. 10.1093/nar/gkn741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Rinaldi AC, Comandini O, Kuyper TW: Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: separating the wheat from the chaff. Fungal Divers. 2008;33:1–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Singer R, Morello JH: Ectotrophic Forest tree mycorrhizae and forest communities. Ecology. 1960;41:549–551. 10.2307/1933331 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Policelli N, Hoeksema JD, Moyano J, et al. : Global pine tree invasions are linked to invasive root symbionts. New Phytol. 2023;237:16–21. 10.1111/nph.18527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Singer R, Araujo I: Litter decomposition and ectomycorrhiza in Amazonian forests. Acta Amazon. 1979;9:25–42. 10.1590/1809-43921979091025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Singer R, Araujo I, Ivory MH: The ectotrophically mycorrhizal fungi of the neotropical lowlands, especially Central Amazonia. Beih Nova Hedwigia. 1983;77:1–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Nouhra ER, Palfner G, Kuhar F, et al. : Ectomycorrhizal fungi in South America: their diversity in past, present and future research. Pagano M, Lugo M, editors. Mycorrhizal fungi in South America. Cham: Springer;2019; pp.73–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Furtado ANM, Leonardi M, Comandini O, et al. : Morphological and molecular characterization of ectomycorrhizas associated with the roots of Guapira opposita ( Nyctaginaceae) in the restinga of southern Brazil. For. Syst. 2023. accepted. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Binfaré RW, Falkenberg DB: Guia ilustrado da Flora da restinga da Santa Catarina. Thesis dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil. 2017.
  • 52. Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, et al. : Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science. 2014;346:6213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Corrales A, Koch RA, Vasco-Palacios AM, et al. : Diversity and distribution of tropical ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycologia. 2022;114:919–933. 10.1080/00275514.2022.2115284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Haug I, Kottke I, Suárez JP: Ectomycorrhizas of three species of Nyctaginaceae in the tropical mountain rain forest of South Ecuador. Ectomycorrhizal symbioses in tropical and neotropical forests. Bâ AM, McGuire KL, Diédhiou AG, editors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press;2014; pp.19–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Moyersoen B: Ectomicorrizas y micorrizas vesículo-arbusculares en Caatinga Amazónica del Sur de Venezuela. Scientia Guaianae. 1993;3. [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Teste FP, Jones MD, Dickie IA: Dual-mycorrhizal plants: their ecology and relevance. New Phytol. 2020;225:1835–1851. 10.1111/nph.16190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Brundrett M, Tedersoo L: Misdiagnosis of mycorrhizas and inappropriate recycling of data can lead to false conclusions. New Phytol. 2019;221:18–24. 10.1111/nph.15440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ashford AE, Allaway WG: A sheathing mycorrhiza on Pisonia grandis R. Br. ( Nyctaginaceae) with development of transfer cells rather than a Hartig Net. New Phytol. 1982;90:511–519. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb04483.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Imhof S: Arbuscular, ecto-related, orchid mycorrhizas—three independent structural lineages towards mycoheterotrophy: implications for classification? Mycorrhiza. 2009;19:357–363. 10.1007/s00572-009-0240-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Haug I, Weiss M, Homeier J, et al. : Russulaceae and Thelephoraceae form ectomycorrhizas with members of the Nyctaginaceae ( Caryophyllales) in the tropical mountain rain forest of southern Ecuador. New Phytol. 2005;165:923–936. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01284.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Álvarez-Majarrez J, Garibay-Orijel R, Smith ME: Caryophyllales are the main hosts of a unique set of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Neotropical dry forest. Mycorrhiza. 2018;28:103–115. 10.1007/s00572-017-0807-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Roy M, Vasco-Palacios A, Geml J, et al. : The (re)discovery of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in Neotropical ecosystems sketched in Florianópolis. New Phytol. 2017;214:920–923. 10.1111/nph.14531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Silva FSP, Ignácio IG, Júnior OJS, et al. : Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in tropical sand dune and restinga at Peró Beach in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Fungal Ecol. 2019;40:150–158. 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.12.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Silva DKA, Pereira CMR, Souza RG, et al. : Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in restinga and dunes areas in Brazilian Northeast. Biodivers. Conserv. 2012;21:2361–2373. 10.1007/s10531-012-0329-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Pagano MC, Silva DK, Silva GA, et al. : Tropical dry forest compared to rainforest and associated ecosystems in Brazil. Pagano M, Lugo M, editors. Mycorrhizal fungi in South America. Cham: Springer;2019; pp.177–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Bonfim JA, Vasconcellos RLF, Gumiere T, et al. : Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest toposequence. Microb. Ecol. 2016;71:164–177. 10.1007/s00248-015-0661-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Sulzbacher MA, Orihara T, Grebenc T, et al. : Longistriata flava ( Boletaceae, Basidiomycota) – a new monotypic sequestrate genus and species from Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mycokeys. 2020;62:53–73. 10.3897/mycokeys.62.39699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Tedersoo L, Sadam A, Zambrano M, et al. : Low diversity and high host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Western Amazonia, a neotropical biodiversity hotspot. ISME J. 2010b;4:1–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Suvi T, Tedersoo L, Abarenkov K, et al. : Mycorrhizal symbionts of Pisonia grandis and P. sechellarum in Seychelles: identification of mycorrhizal fungi and description of new Tomentella species. Mycologia. 2010;102:522–533. 10.3852/09-147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Hayward J, Horton T: Phylogenetic trait conservation in the partner choice of a group of ectomycorrhizal trees. Mol. Ecol. 2014;23:4886–4898. 10.1111/mec.12903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Coimbra VRM, Wartchow F, Gibertoni TB: Studies on Entoloma ( Agaricales, Entolomataceae) in the Atlantic Forest, Northeast Brazil. Nova Hedwigia. 2013;97:139–157. 10.1127/0029-5035/2013/0100 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Pinheiro FGB, Sá MCA, Wartchow F: Hydropus griseolazulinus, a striking new species from Paraíba, Brazil. Mycosphere. 2013;4:218–225. 10.5943/mycosphere/4/2/4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Coimbra VRM, Pinheiro FGB, Wartchow F, et al. : Studies on Gymnopus sect. Impudicae ( Omphalotaceae, Agaricales) from Northern Brazil: two new species and notes on G. montagnei. Mycol. Prog. 2015;14:110. 10.1007/s11557-015-1131-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Magnago AC, Alves-Silva G, Henkel TW, et al. : New genera, species and combination of Boletaceae from Brazil and Guiana. Mycologia. 2022;114:607–625. 10.1080/00275514.2022.2037307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Magnago AC, Neves MA, Silveira RMB: Boletellus nordestinus ( Boletaceae, Boletales), a new species from Northeastern Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Stud Fungi. 2019;4:47–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 76. McNeil R: Le grand livre des champignons du Quebec et de l’est du Canada. Waterloo: Editions Michel Quintin;2006;575. [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Barbosa-Silva A, Wartchow F: Studies on Boletellus sect. Boletellus in Brazil and Guyana. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 2017;4:387–395. [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Bas C: Studies in Amanita—I. Some species from Amazonia. Persoonia: Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi. 1978;10:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Meijer AA: Preliminary list of the macromycetes from the Brazilian state of Paraná. Bol. Mus. Bot. Municipal. 2006;68:1–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Wartchow F, Maia LC: The neotropical Amanita crebresulcata Bas: new citation from Northeast Brazil. Hoehnea. 2007;34:131–134. 10.1590/S2236-89062007000200001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Magnago AC, Furtado ANM, Urrea-Valencia S, et al. : New records of agaricoid fungi ( Basidiomycota) from Paraíba, Brazil. Biotemas. 2015;28:9. 10.5007/2175-7925.2015v28n4p9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Scheibler G: Sistemática de Amanita Pers. ( Amanitaceae, Basidiomycota) no Brasil. Thesis dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil. 2019.
  • 83. Grandi RAP, Guzmán G, Bononi VL: Adições às Agaricales ( Basidiomycetes) do Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Rickia. 1984;11:27–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Menolli N, Jr, Asai T, Capelari M: Amanita coacta ( Amanitaceae, Agaricales) with a key to Amanita species occurring in Brazil. Mycotaxon. 2009;107:419–430. 10.5248/107.419 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Menolli N, Jr, Capelari M, Baseia IG: Amanita viscidolutea, a new species from Brazil with a key to Central and South American species of Amanita section Amanita. Mycologia. 2009;101:395–400. 10.3852/07-079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Zhang LF, Yang JB, Yang ZL: Molecular phylogeny of eastern Asian species of Amanita ( Agaricales, Basidiomycota): taxonomic and biogeographic implications. Fungal Divers. 2004;17. [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Cui YY, Cai Q, Tang LP, et al. : The family Amanitaceae: molecular phylogeny, higher-rank taxonomy and the species in China. Fungal Divers. 2018;91:5–230. 10.1007/s13225-018-0405-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Wartchow F, Maia LC, Cavalcanti MAQ: Studies on Amanita ( Agaricomycetidae, Amanitaceae) in Brazil: two yellow gemmatoid taxa. Beih Nova Hedwigia. 2012;96:61–71. 10.1127/0029-5035/2012/0053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Montagne JPFC: Cryptogamia Guyanensis. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Ser. 1854;4:91–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Henkel T, Wilson AW, Aime MC, et al. : Cantharellaceae of Guyana II: New species of Craterellus, new South American distribution records for Cantharellus guyanensis and Craterellus excelsus, and a key to the Neotropical taxa. Mycologia. 2014;106:307–324. 10.3852/106.2.307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Neves MA, Cardoso JS: Cantharellus guyanensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2020. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T172740593A172861197.en [DOI]
  • 92. Wartchow F, Buyck B, Maia LC: Cantharellus aurantioconspicuus ( Cantharellales), a new species from Pernambuco, Brazil. Beih Nova Hedwigia. 2012;94:129–137. 10.1127/0029-5035/2012/0094-0129 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Adeney JM, Christensen NL, Vicentini A, et al. : White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia. Biotropica. 2016;48:7–23. 10.1111/btp.12293 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Ferst LM, Furtado ANM, Lima DF, et al. : New species and identification key of Clavulina ( Clavulinaceae) from Brazil. Sydowia. 2023;75. [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Rick JE: Basidiomycetes Eubasidii in Rio Grande do Sul − Brasilia. III. Iheringia Ser Bot. 1959;5:126–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Corner EJH: A monograph of Clavaria and allied genera. London: Oxford University Press;1950. [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Corner EJH: Supplement to “A monograph of Clavaria and allied genera”. Nova Hedwigia. 1970;33:1–299. [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Olariaga I, Jugo BM, García-Etxebarria K, et al. : Species delimitation in the european species of Clavulina ( Chantarellales, Basidomycota) inferred from phylogenetic analyses of ITS region and morphological data. Mycol. Res. 2009;113:1261–1270. 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Wartchow F: Clavulina incrustata, a new species from Pernambuco, Brazil. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2012;33:105–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Tibpromma S, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, et al. : Fungal diversity notes 491–602: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2017;83(83):1–261. 10.1007/s13225-017-0378-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Smith ME, Henkel TW, Aime MC, et al. : Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure on three co-occurring leguminous canopy tree species in a Neotropical rainforest. New Phytol. 2011;2011(192):699–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Kennedy PG, Matheny PB, Ryberg KM, et al. : Scaling up: examining the macroecology of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mol. Ecol. 2012;21:4151–4154. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05703.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Uehling JK, Henkel TW, Aime MC, et al. : New species and distribution records for Clavulina ( Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) from the Guiana Shield, with a key to the lowland neotropical taxa. Fungal Biol. 2012;116:1263–1274. 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Uehling JK, Henkel TW, Vilgalys R, et al. : Membranomyces species are common ectomycorrhizal symbionts in Northern Hemisphere forests. Mycorrhiza. 2012;22:577–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Nuhn ME, Binder M, Taylor AF, et al. : Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae. Fungal Biol. 2013;2013(117):479–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Wu G, Femg B, Xu JP, et al. : Molecular phylogenetic analyses redefine seven major clades and reveal 22 new generic clades in the fungal family Boletaceae. Fungal Divers. 2014;69:93–115. 10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Mueller GM, Cunha KM, May TW, et al. : What do the first 597 Global Fungal Red List assessments tell us about the threat status of fungi? Diversity. 2022;14:736. 10.3390/d14090736 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Leonardi M, Comandini O, Sanjust E, et al. : Conservation status of milkcaps ( Basidiomycota, Russulales, Russulaceae), with notes on poorly known species. Sustainability. 2021;13:10365. 10.3390/su131810365 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Neves MA, Furtado ANM: Amanita viscidolutea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2020. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T172740193A172861167.en [DOI]
  • 110. Magnago AC, Neves MA: New record of Austroboletus festivus (Boletaceae) from Santa Catarina, Brazil. Braz. J. Bot. 2014;36:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Neves MA, Furtado ANM, Cardoso JS: Austroboletus festivus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2020. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T172740512A172861192.en [DOI]
  • 112. Silva-Flores PA, Argüelles-Moyao A, Aguilar-Paredes A, et al. : Mycorrhizal outreach: what is there and what can we do in a global change context. Plants People Planet. 2021;3:506–522. [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Wartchow F, Tulloss RE, Cavalcanti MAQ: The discovery of Amanita lilloi in Brazil. Mycotaxon. 2007;99:167–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Wartchow F, Sulzbacher MA, Baseia IG: Amanita psammolimbata, a new species from Northeastern Brazilian sand dunes. Mycosphere. 2015;6:260–265. 10.5943/mycosphere/6/3/3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Vanegas-Léon M: Ectomicorrizas tropicais: estudo de casos na Mata Atlântica. Thesis dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil. 2017.
  • 116. Baseia IG, Galvão TCO: Some interesting Gasteromycetes ( Basidiomycota) in dry áreas from Northeastern Brazil. Acta Bot. Bras. 2001;16:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Magnago AC: Estudos taxonômicos e filogenéticos de fungos boletoides ( Boletales) no Brasil. Doctoral thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 2018.
  • 118. Oliveira IC, Sousa MA: Boletales ( Hymenomycetes) no Campus I da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa: II – Gyrodontacea. REVNEBIO. 1996;119:7–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Pinheiro FGB, Wartchow F: Cantharellus protectus, a new species from Paraíba, Brazil. Sydowia. 2013;65:27–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Wartchow F: Clavulina amazonenses, um hongo amazónico descubierto em la Mata Atlántica. Tomo. 2012;37:113–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Baltazar JM, Ryvarden L, Gibertoni TB: The genus Coltricia in Brazil: new records and two new species. Mycologia. 2010;102:1253–1262. 10.3852/09-227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Baltazar JM, Bittencourt F, Neves MA, et al. : Coltricia permollis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2022;e.T209595443A209596030.
  • 123. Sá MCA, Pinheiro FGB, Silva NA, et al. : Craterellus niger ( Cantharellaceae, Cantharellales, Basidiomycota): a new species from Pernambuco, Brazil. Nova Hedwig. 2014;99:525–530. 10.1127/0029-5035/2014/0199 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Wartchow F, Maia LC, Cavalcante MAQ: New records of Agaricales from Atlantic Forest fragments of Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil. Mycotaxon. 2011;118:137–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Magnago AC, Neves MA, Silveira RMB: Fistulinella ruschii sp. nov. and a new record of Fistulinella campinaranae var. scrobiculata for the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Mycologia. 2018;109:1003–1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Oliveira IC, Sousa MA: Boletales ( Hymenomycetes) no Campus I da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa: III – Strobilomycetaceae. REVNEBIO. 2002;16:43–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Linhares FTF, Reck MA, Daniëls PP, et al. : Gloeocantharellus aculeatus ( Gomphaceae), a new neotropical species in the gomphoi-phalloid clade. Phytotaxa. 2016;268:193–202. 10.11646/phytotaxa.268.3.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Wartchow F, Sá MCA, Coimbra VRM: A new species of Gloeocantharellus from the Atlantic Forest of Paraíba, Brazil. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 2017;7:183–186. 10.5943/cream/7/3/4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Gibertoni TB, Ryvarden L, Cavalcanti MAQ: New records of Aphyllophorales ( Basidiomycota) in the Atlantic Rain Forest in Northeast Brazil. Acta Bot. Bras. 2004;18:975–979. 10.1590/S0102-33062004000400027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Wartchow F, Bezerra JL, Cavalcanti MAQ: Lactifluus batistae ( Russulaceae), a new species from Bahia, Brazil. Agrotrópica. 2013;25:103–108. 10.21757/0103-3816.2013v25n2p103-108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Sá MCA, Baseia IG, Wartchow F: Lactifluus dunensis, a new species from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Mycosphere. 2013;4:261–265. 10.5943/mycosphere/4/2/9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Duque-Barbosa JA, Delgat L, Elias SG, et al. : A new section, Lactifluus section Neotropicus ( Russulaceae), and two new Lactifluus species from the Atlantic Forest, Brasil. Syst. Biodivers. 2020;18:347–361. 10.1080/14772000.2020.1769221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Silva-Filho AGS, Sá MCA, Komura DL, et al. : Two novel species of Lactifluus subg. Pseudogymnocarpi ( Russulaceae) from Brazil. Phytotaxa. 2020;436:222–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Valões-Araújo JC, Wartchow F: Checklist of the agaricoid and similar morphology mycobiota of Paraíba State, Brazil. Hoehnea. 2021;48:e1322020. 10.1590/2236-8906-132/2020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Calaça FJS, Magnago AC, Alvarenga RLM, et al. : Phlebopus beniensis ( Boletinellaceae, Boletales) in the Brazilian Cerrado biome. Rodriguésia. 2018;69:939–944. 10.1590/2175-786020186924x6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Barbosa-Silva A, Wartchow F: Studies on Boletellus sect. Boletellus in Brazil and Guyana. Cur. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 2020;7:387–395. [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Sulzbacher MA, Grebenc T, Cabral TS, et al. : Restingomyces, a new sequestrate genus from the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest that is phylogenetically related to early-diverging taxa in Trappeaceae ( Phallales). Mycologia. 2016;108:954–966. 10.3852/15-265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Sá MCA, Baseia IG, Wartchow F: Checklist of Russulaceae of Brazil. Mycotaxon. 2013;125:303. 10.5248/125.303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Wartchow F, Sulzbacher MA, Selosse M-A, et al. : Sebacina aureomagnifica, a new heterobasidiomycete from the Atlantic Forest of northeast Brazil. Mycol. Prog. 2015;14:109. 10.1007/s11557-015-1132-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Chikowski RS, Larsoon K-H, Gibertoni TB: Taxonomic novelties in Trechispora ( Trechisporales, Basidiomycota) from Brazil. Mycol. Prog. 2020;19:1403–1414. 10.1007/s11557-020-01635-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Meiras-Ottoni A, Larsson K-H, Gibertoni TB: Additions to Trechispora and the status of Scytinopogon ( Trechisporales, Basdiomycota). Mycol. Prog. 2021;20:203–222. 10.1007/s11557-021-01667-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Magnago AC, Reck MA, Dentinger BTM, et al. : Two new Tylopilus species ( Boletaceae) from Northeastern Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Phytotaxa. 2017;316:250–260. 10.11646/phytotaxa.316.3.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Barbosa-Silva A, Sulzbacher MA, Wartchow F: Tylopilus nigripes sp. nov. ( Boletaceae, Basidiomycota) from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Feddes Repert. 2020;131:244–250. 10.1002/fedr.201900018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Singer R, Digilo APL: Las boletaceas de sudamerica tropical. Lilloa. 1960;30:141–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M30AR173 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
  • 146. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M34ER198 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
  • 147. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M36AR200a small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
  • 148. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M36AR200b internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
  • 149. Furtado ANM: Austroboletus festivus isolate M41CR210 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
  • 150. Furtado ANM: Inocybe sp. isolate M51AR230 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
  • 151. Furtado ANM: Thelephoraceae sp. isolate M53AR235 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
  • 152. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M57BR248 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
  • 153. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M68AR291 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
F1000Res. 2023 May 30. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.144410.r167497

Reviewer response for version 1

Roberto Flores Arzù 1

This article proves the importance of the Restinga Forest of Brazil, a not well-known ecosystem, whose mycobiota astonish with the presence of ectomycorrhizal fungi, with common genera present in Northern Hemisphere and temperate regions as Tomentella and Thelephora, but also with new records of basidiomicetes in Amanita, Austroboletus, Clavulina, Inocybe and Russula. The study verifies the identity of the fungal symbionts not only by the fruit bodies but also by different ectomycorrhizhae in restinga soil and by molecular analyses using the ITS region, adequate but not exhaustive to separate fungal genera and species.

The results remind the mycobiota found in the Guyana Shield, a region with similar tree genera but with the description of a new mycorrhiza type: the guapiroid, formed by Guapira and some fungal genera. A good discussion is introduced about coexistence and the role of AMF and ECM fungi in the Restinga Forest, as well as an accurate review of the distribution of the South American ectomycorrhizal species found.

The results are very interesting for the fungal diversity found. Authors humbly say that they are “just scratching the surface” of the Brazilian Restinga Forest and it is quite possible that diversity will be larger.

1. The work is clear, accurately presented and cites current literature with novel results for ECM fungi in South America.

2. Appropriate study design, considering the references and the sequences used in the analyses and conclusions.

3. Methodology sufficiently detailed and analysis provided can be replicated by others. There were no new techniques applied but a well-documented study to support the results.

4. The conclusions are quite supported by the results due to the deep bibliographic analysis about fungi and symbiont plants in Tropical South America.

5. Some minor changes could improve the paper as linking better the phrases in the first paragraph of Introduction.

6. The Figure 2 could be omitted if published in references 33 or 50.

7. Authors point correctly that genus Boletus has not been recorded in Brazil except from exotic plantations.

8. Maybe they could say something about the two Phlebopus species cited in the database, considering that both species have an African origin?

9. There is a good analysis for Boletellus in Brazil as well as for Amanita and Clavulina.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Ectomycorrhizal mushrooms of the Neotropics, especially in Subtropical lands. Ethnomycology. Ectomycorrhizae.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2023 Apr 24. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.144410.r168665

Reviewer response for version 1

Julieta Álvarez Manjarrez 1

The paper is a very important piece of information about the fungal diversity of a natural ecosystem in Brazil. The sampling reported 726 records from ectomycorrhizal taxa with the identification of their hosts. The paper is very well written and I just added few comments to improve it:

  • “In Brazil, ectomycorrhizal fungi often have a fragmented distribution due to the lack of information about them and because they do not always have the same distribution as the host plants”

    It is necessary to rephrase the two ideas of this sentences: the estimation of ECM fungi distribution is fragmented according to the current information; and how is it possible that the distribution have not the same distribution of host plants, I think you mean there is still missing information about all the ECM hosts in Brazil. Also, the citation you used to argue this sentence came from other countries but you are talking particularly from Brazil, could you add some accurate reference for Brazil ECM fungi and their hosts?

  • "This can result in high endemism at the species level due to the specific habitats they occupy."

    For me is not clear how the lack of information, that is the main topic of the previous sentence, would produce high endemism. Please be more clear about this hypothesis.

  • "In 2016, Roy and coworkers reported approximately 180 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Brazilian native forests. 15  In fact, the majority of the published studies were conducted in introduced Pinus and Eucalyptus plantations."

    The writing is very confusing, first you mentioned the number of species in native forests, but then you jumped to talk about plantations. I recommend to remove the plantation sentence from this paragraph and try to write a better connection between all the ideas form this paragraph.

  • In Restinga definition, please provide information about the soil types.

  • For Figure 1 it would be more useful to be closer to the areas that have this vegetation instead of presenting all Latin American map, and indicate with a signal the places you studied.

  • Add the GenBank number accession of the ITS region from the plant.

  • “The roots were washed and carefully selected under a stereomicroscope.” - Which characteristics you observed to select the root tips?

  • How did you extract DNA from the ECM tips?

  • In Table 1, would be ideal to know the location of every fungal species collections. Also it is unclear how you add more than one host per ECM fungal species, 1) how did you obtain more than 1 host? Then, when you have a list of hosts, use the asterisk for every single host name to refers to potential host. For example: Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Mimosaceae*, does that mean that just Mimosaceae is not confirmed or the whole plant list?

  • Add the GenBank number accession of your data in the Table 1. And add a column saying if the sequences were obtained from fruitbodies or ECM root tips.

  • I found some plant names are taxonomically incorrect, for example Mimosaceae or Caesalpiniaceae. Confirm that all the plant species/family names you are using are correct. You can use theplantlist.org or tropicos.org. I encourage that if there is a list of plants from the restinga, provide it in a Support information or at least a link where we can read the possible host names in each plant family you mentioned.

  • What is the percentage of similarity between your specimens of A. crebresulcata and GenBank? Could they be a different species?

  • “Considering all the  Clavulina described for the restinga” add citations

  • Add scale bar to each photo in Figures 2 and 3.

  • Provide an anatomical photo from the EM of Guapira opposita and cited after “The ectomycorrhizal morphotypes we observed on G. opposita do not present the intraradical hyphae arrangement observed in other Nyctaginaceae. However, the absence of Hartig net recorded in our study is another indication of the plasticity and peculiarity of mycorrhizal biology of this host plant family.”

  • You mentioned the AMF in restinga had been studied; besides G. opposita, do you know if your EM hosts also have AM in their roots?

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Tropical ecology and fungal systematics, especially ectomycorrhizal fungi

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Furtado ANM, Leonardi M, Comandini O, et al. : @F1000 Res_Supplementary Table 1.xlsx.[Dataset]. figshare. 2023. 10.6084/m9.figshare.22196836 [DOI]
    2. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M30AR173 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
    3. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M34ER198 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
    4. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M36AR200a small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
    5. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M36AR200b internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
    6. Furtado ANM: Austroboletus festivus isolate M41CR210 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
    7. Furtado ANM: Inocybe sp. isolate M51AR230 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
    8. Furtado ANM: Thelephoraceae sp. isolate M53AR235 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
    9. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M57BR248 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source
    10. Furtado ANM: Tomentella sp. isolate M68AR291 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.[Dataset]. GenBank. 2022. Reference Source

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M30R173. Accession number OP819286; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819286. 145

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M34R198. Accession number OP819287; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819287. 146

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M36AR200a. Accession number OP819288; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819288. 147

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M36AR200b. Accession number OP819289; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819289. 148

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Austroboletus festivus isolate M41CR210. Accession number OP819290; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819290. 149

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Inocybe sp. isolate M51AR230. Accession number OP819291; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819291. 150

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Thelephoraceae isolate M53AR235. Accession number OP819292; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819292. 151

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M57BR248. Accession number OP819293; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819293. 152

    GenBank: Eukaryotic Nuclear rDNA/ITS/Restinga ectomycorrhizas/Tomentella sp. isolate M68AR291. Accession number OP819294; https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:OP819294. 153

    Figshare: Collections of ectomycorrhizal fungi from restinga fragments on the Brazilian coast. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22196836. 23

    This project contains the following underlying data:

    • Furtado ANM et al - @F1000 Res_Supplementary Table 1.xlsx.

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES