Skip to main content
Frontiers in Psychology logoLink to Frontiers in Psychology
. 2023 May 18;14:1163212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1163212

Corrigendum: Sociodemographic correlates and mental health comorbidities in adolescents with social anxiety: the Young-HUNT3 study, Norway

Ingunn Jystad 1,2, Ottar Bjerkeset 1,3, Tommy Haugan 1, Erik R Sund 1,4,5, Jonas Vaag 1,6,*
PMCID: PMC10234119  PMID: 37275724

In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. In the rows, “Mean all social anxiety items (SPAI-C) (SD)” and “Mean anxiety and depression items (SCL-5) (SD)” the mean values for SPAI-C and SCL-5 were erroneously reported with standard errors (SE) instead of standard deviations (SD). The corrected Table 1 appears below.

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of adolescents in Young-HUNT3 categorized/identified as Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM IV: child version (ADIS-C) screening negative, ADIS-C screening positive, screening positive not met to interview, and as diagnosed social anxiety disorder (SAD) cases.

SAD (ADIS-C) Screening neg (n = 6,222) SAD (ADIS-C) screening pos (n = 388)
All screening positives Screening positives that did not meet to interview Screening positives met to interview and diagnosed with SAD
(n=388) (n=176) (n=106)
Sex n (%)
Girls 3063 (49.23) 267 (68.81) 120 (68.18) 85 (80.19)
Boys 3159 (50.77) 121 (31.19) 56 (31.82) 21 (19.81)
Age mean (SD) 15.97 (1.70) 16.12 (1.90) 16.47 (2.13) 15.74 (1.63)
Age distribution n (%)
13–15 years 3176 (51.04) 195 (50.26) 76 (43.18) 62 (58.49)
≥16 years 3046 (48.96) 193 (49.74) 100 (56.82) 44 (41.51)
Subjective family economy3 n (%)
Worse than others 497 (8.46) 57 (15.92) 29 (18.13) 17 (17.35)
Mean all social anxiety items (SPAI-C) (SD) 1.86 (0.67) 2.82 (0.87) 2.86 (0.86) 3.04 (0.92)
Girls (mean all social anxiety items) 2.00 (0.67) 2.91 (0.85) 2.96 (0.85) 3.07 (0.87)
Boys (mean all social anxiety items) 1.71 (0.64) 2.63 (0.90) 2.65 (0.84) 2.91 (1.11)
Mean anxiety and depression items (SCL-5) (SD) 1.47 (0.52) 2.01 (0.72) 2.05 (0.73) 2.11 (0.74)
Difficulties falling asleep n (%)
Almost every night/often 890 (14.83) 115 (31.08) 54 (32.53) 33 (33.00)
Early morning awakening n (%)
Almost every night/often 342 (5.72) 55 (14.99) 30 (18.29) 12 (12.12)
Self-rated health n (%)
Very good/good 5536 (90.19) 293 (77.72) 132 (77.65) 81 (78.64)
Not very good/poor 602 (9.81) 84 (22.28) 38 (22.35) 22 (21.36)
Help-seeking n (%)
Psychologist 252 (4.39) 55 (16.18) 30 (19.87) 18 (18.75)
School health service 1249 (21.79) 91 (26.84) 36 (23.84) 34 (35.79)
Doctor at hospital 1719 (29.86) 130 (37.68) 55 (35.95) 42 (43.75)
All 3660 (67.48) 247 (77.43) 108 (78.83) 80 (88.89)
Physical activity n (%)
High 2555 (41.59) 89 (23.61) 40 (23.81) 18 (16.98)
Moderate 2139 (34.82) 149 (39.52) 59 (35.12) 51 (48.11)
Low 1449 (23.59) 139 (36.87) 69 (41.07) 37 (34.91)
Alcohol intoxications n (%)
Never 3087 (49.98) 217 (56.66) 94 (54.34) 65 (61.90)
1–10 times 1590 (25.74) 97 (25.33) 35 (20.23) 30 (28.57)
>10 times 1499 (24.27) 69 (18.02) 44 (25.43) 10 (9.52)
Smoking n (%)
Current smoker 877 (14.37) 63 (16.54) 31 (18.02) 17 (16.19)

Missing values ranged between 0.9% (alcohol intoxications) and 14.4% (all help).

Regarding the SPAI-C questions, missing values ranged between 2.8 and 3.2% across the six items, and the summed mean SPAI-C score missed values for 4.4% of the participants (19 (4.9%) of the screening positives, and 4 (3.8%) of the SAD individuals). For SCL-5, missing values ranged between 2.6 and 2.8% across the five items, and the summed total mean score missed values for 3.5% (16 (4.1%) of the screening positives, 2 (1.9%) of the SAD individuals).

In addition, there was also an error in Table 2 as published. The row “All” in the section “Help Seeking” was erroneously excluded. The corrected Table 2 appears below.

Table 2.

Age- and sex adjusted associations (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval) between sociodemographic and health-related variables and the different subgroups of social anxiety.

SAD (ADIS-C) screening pos (n=388)
All screening positives (n = 388) Screening positives that did not meet to interview (n = 176) Screening positives met to interview and diagnosed with SAD (n = 106)
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Sex 1
Boys 1 1 1
Girls 2.28 1.82-2.84 2.20 1.60-3.04 4.18 2.59-6.76
Age distribution 2
13–15 years 1 1 1
≥16 years 1.02 0.83-1.26 1.36 1.01-1.84 0.73 0.50-1.08
Family economy 3
Equal 1 1 1
Worse 1.93 1.42-2.62 2.20 1.44-3.36 2.04 1.19-3.50
Better 0.88 0.65-1.20 0.84 0.53-1.35 0.51 0.24-1.06
SPAI-C 3 4.17 3.64-4.78 4.16 3.47-4.99 4.99 3.98-6.26
SCL-5 3 3.25 2.79-3.79 3.36 2.72-4.15 3.49 2.70-4.50
Difficulties falling asleep 3
Occasionally/never 1 1 1
Almost every night/often 2.33 1.85-2.95 2.49 1.78-3.48 2.40 1.57-3.68
Early morning awakening 3
Occasionally/never 1 1 1
Almost every night/often 2.67 1.96-3.64 3.38 2.24-5.12 2.03 1.09-3.76
Self-rated health 3
Very good/good 1 1 1
Not very good/poor 2.52 1.94-3.26 2.46 1.69-3.57 2.44 1.51-3.97
Help seeking 3
No help seeking 1 1 1
Psychologist 3.80 2.76-5.24 4.67 3.05-7.15 4.65 2.72-7.98
School health service 1.15 0.89-1.47 0.97 0.66-1.43 1.65 1.07-2.53
Doctor at hospital 1.35 1.08-1.69 1.23 0.88-1.72 1.72 1.14-2.59
All 1.44 1.09-1.90 1.48 0.97-2.26 3.41 1.75-6.64
Physical activity 3
High 1 1 1
Moderate 1.87 1.43-2.45 1.65 1.10-2.49 3.06 1.78-5.26
Low 2.63 1.99-3.46 2.82 1.90-4.21 3.50 1.98-6.20
Alcohol intoxications 3
Never 1 1 1
1-10 times 0.72 0.54-0.94 0.53 0.34-0.81 0.79 0.49-1.28
>10 times 0.51 0.37-0.71 0.63 0.40-0.98 0.28 0.13-0.60
Smoking 3
Never/previous smoker 1 1 1
Current smoker 1.14 0.85-1.52 1.16 0.77-1.74 1.23 0.71-2.13

1) Adjusted only for age.

2) Adjusted only for sex.

3) Adjusted for age and sex.

In addition, there was also an error in Materials and methods, Measures, “Social Anxiety Disorder Screening and Clinical Interview (n = 6,610 and 212)”, “Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM IV: Child Version”, Paragraph 1. The number of participants who were asked the three social anxiety items was incorrectly stated as “n = 6,6610”, but should be “n = 6,610”. The corrected paragraph appears below.

The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM IV: Child Version is a semi-structured interview used to diagnose anxiety disorders and other mental disorders in children and adolescents, according to the DSM-IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2000; Rasmussen and Neumer, 2015). In the present study, the interview modules for SAD, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), separation anxiety disorder (SEP), specific phobias (SPH), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), dysthymia, and depression were used. For more convenient administration and coding, the modules were slightly shortened. In addition, questions regarding symptoms of substance abuse were asked, yet a diagnostic evaluation of substance abuse cannot be set based on the ADIS-C interview alone (Rasmussen and Neumer, 2015). The original version of ADIS-C has shown promising reliability (Lyneham et al., 2007), whereas research on psychometric properties of the Norwegian version is limited (Rasmussen and Neumer, 2015). However, the instrument is widely used in specialist health service, and items largely resemble the diagnostic criteria described in DSM-IV. It is highly recommended that it is used/applied only by trained clinicians with knowledge to the instrument and the diagnostic criteria (Rasmussen and Neumer, 2015). All participants (n = 6,610) were asked the following three social anxiety items from the ADIS-C (yes/no): “When you are with others, at school, in restaurants or at parties, do you ever feel that people might think that something you do is stupid or dumb?”, “When you are with other people at school, restaurants, or parties, do you think that people might laugh at you?”, and “When you are in these situations with others (school, restaurants, and parties), do you worry that you might do something that will make you feel ashamed or embarrassed?”. Individuals who answered yes to one or more questions were considered SP (n = 388) and invited to participate in a complete ADIS-C interview performed by specially trained psychiatric nurses. Those who answered no to all three questions were considered screening negative (SN; n = 6,222).

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Articles from Frontiers in Psychology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES