Skip to main content
JAAD International logoLink to JAAD International
. 2023 Apr 26;12:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2023.04.007

Hydrochlorothiazide increases risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer in an elderly Japanese cohort with hypertension: The Shizuoka study

Hideo Hashizume a,b,, Eiji Nakatani a,∗∗, Hatoko Sasaki a, Yoshiki Miyachi a
PMCID: PMC10236168  PMID: 37274382

Abstract

Background

Hydrochlorothiazide (HCT), a widely used hypertensive drug, has photocarcinogenic potential, leading to concerns about the development of nonmelanoma skin cancers (SCs) after intake. Despite substantial numbers of observational studies, the results remain inconsistent especially among Asian countries.

Objective

To assess the incidence of nonmelanoma SCs in hypertensive Japanese HCT users compared with nonusers.

Methods

A population-based, cohort nested, propensity score-matched study was conducted using the Shizuoka Kokuho database. All participants were patients aged ≥60 years. Hazard ratios for SC incidence were calculated in the matched cohorts using the propensity scores of potential confounders, sex, age category, comorbidities, and administration of methotrexate, cyclosporin, and statins.

Results

The risk of SC was higher in HCT users than in nonusers (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.40), with preferential sun-exposed location and a tendency to develop squamous cell carcinoma, but not basal cell carcinoma or Bowen disease.

Limitations

No additional information was available from other than medical records. The data were confined to a Japanese population.

Conclusion

HCT use increases the risk of SC in Japanese patients with hypertension and a dark skin type, highlighting the increased risk of SC among HCT users in the aging society worldwide.

Key words: big data, carcinogenesis, clinical research, cohort study, epidemiology, hydrochlorothiazide, observational study, skin cancer


Capsule Summary.

  • Hydrochlorothiazide, a widely used drug, has demonstrated photocarcinogenic potential, leading to concerns about the development of nonmelanoma skin cancers in the users.

  • Hydrochlorothiazide increases the risk of skin cancer even among Japanese hypertensive patients with relatively dark skin type, highlighting hazard of this usage in aging societies worldwide.

Introduction

Hypertension may cause life-threatening events.1 It presents an increasing burden in elderly people2 and is expected to expand rapidly worldwide in the next 2 decades. Cochrane analysis concluded that low-dose thiazides reduced all morbidity and mortality outcomes in adult hypertensive patients,3 leading to the rapid spread of hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) use in many countries, including Japan. HCT is a well-known diuretic that is still used worldwide because of its safety, efficacy, and economic benefits.1

In Japan, antihypertensives are used by 70% of older people and HCT is prescribed to 6.4% of them.4 However, HCT is known to cause photosensitivity dermatitis5,6 and also acts as a chromophore that absorbs UV radiation and transfers energy to adjacent pyrimidine nucleotides of DNA to form dimers with mutagenic potential.7,8 Several epidemiologic studies accordingly warned that HCT use may be associated with a substantially increased risk of skin cancers (SCs),9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 leading to concern over the development of SCs after HCT intake. Recent meta-analyses indicated possible carcinogenesis in HCT users in non-Asian countries,11,29,32 and in 2019, The International Agency for Research on Cancer claimed that HCT had carcinogenic potential as a class 2B agent.33 However, conflicting results among Asian countries mean that its status remains debatable.31,34, 35, 36 We aimed to clarify this issue in a population-based retrospective cohort study using the Shizuoka Kokuho database (SKDB), to improve our understanding of the potential cancer risks associated with HCT use in Japanese hypertensive patients.

Methods

Study design

This was a population-based, cohort nested, propensity score (PS)-matched study conducted using the SKDB. All participants were patients aged ≥60 years who were treated for hypertension during the study period. The primary outcome was the time to SC event onset, compared between HCT users and nonusers.

Setting and data source

Shizuoka prefecture was considered to be representative of Japan as a whole in terms of its population dynamics, nature, climate, industry, economy, and culture. The SKDB includes information on a regional, population-based longitudinal cohort comprising 2,230,848 Japanese individuals (women, n = 1,211,161; 54.3%) living in Shizuoka prefecture, near the center of Japan (population approximately 3.6 million),37 and has been used as a data source in several studies.38, 39, 40, 41 Comprehensive personally linked data were collected and all individuals were assigned a unique identifier. The dataset includes basic information from the subscriber list (sex, age, zip code, observation period, and reason for disenrollment, including death). Claims data were obtained from public health insurance organizations (<75 years old, national health insurance; ≥75 years old, late-stage elderly medical care system [LSEMCS]). The SKDB is a suitable database for statistical studies in Japan because it contains accurate information on deaths and losses to follow-up from Japan’s Basic Resident Registration Network System. Furthermore, the database uses the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes to search and classify diagnoses.

Study population

We conducted a database-nested cohort study using the SKDB during a study period from April 1, 2012, to September 30, 2020. All participants were aged ≥60 years and subscribed to national health insurance or LSEMCS during the study period. Cohort entry was defined as the registration date with the respective health insurance agency or April 1, 2012, whichever occurred later. The exclusion assessment window was from 1 year before the index date. Patients already prescribed HCT, patients diagnosed with nonmelanoma SC including solar keratosis (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC] in situ of skin), lymphoma, AIDS, and metastatic solid tumors, and patients who were not prescribed hypertension medication were excluded.

Baseline conditions

The covariate assessment window was from 1 year before the index date. Comorbidities were examined using the Charlson/Elixhauser comorbidy indexes.42 Related confounders were age, sex, Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities, and use of drugs that might impact cancer development, including cyclosporin-A, methotrexate, and statins.43, 44, 45 The participants were categorized into 4 age groups (60-69 years, 70-79 years, 80-89 years, and ≥90 years) and according to the presence or absence of comorbidities and drug use.

HCT and SC incidence

The primary outcome was time to SC event onset, including SCC in situ, such as solar keratosis and Bowen disease. An SC event was defined using ICD-1046 (Supplementary Table I, available via Mendeley at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/2sn9k5g3n7/1). We used a new-user design to estimate the causal effect of HCT exposure on SC incidence with less bias.47 The index date was defined as the day on which HCT was first prescribed for patients in the HCT-user group and as the day of 1 year after cohort entry date in the non-HCT user group. We adopted a 1-year latency period between the index date and SC onset in the HCT user and non-HCT user groups, consistent with a similar study48 and primary cutaneous cancer doubling times.49 The end date of the follow-up period was defined as the date of SC development, the end date of the study (September 30, 2020), or the withdrawal date from the national health insurance or LSEMCS program, whichever occurred first.

Statistical analyses

Means and interquartile ranges were calculated for continuous variables and frequencies (percentage) for categorical variables for both groups. Missing values were not imputed. Individual PSs for HCT exposure as an outcome variable were estimated using a multivariate logistic regression model conditional on potential confounders. One-to-one greedy matching was implemented with a caliper width equal to 0.20 of the standard deviation of the logit of the PS. Standardized mean differences with a cutoff value of 0.10 were then adopted to assess the balance of covariates between the 2 groups in the overall population and the PS-matched population. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of SC development were estimated using a univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between HCT, as a potential photocarcinogen, and the incidence of SC in sun-exposed areas. However, detailed data on the location of SC were not available in the SKDB, and we therefore, designated the face, neck, hands, and forearms as sun-exposed sites and other sites as sun-unexposed sites. We then compared the risk of SC between the HCT user and non-HCT user cohorts matched for PSs. This study did not assess the relationship between cumulative HCT dose and SC development because of the difficulty in acquiring the data. We also conducted an additional analysis to investigate the pathological types of SC associated with HCT administration, although relevant data were similarly only available for limited cases from the SKDB.

All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). All measures of associations were reported with the corresponding 95% CIs. All statistical tests were two-sided. CIs not overlapping 1.0 indicated statistical significance.

Ethics and data availability statements

The SKDB data were anonymized.37 The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health (#SGUPH_2021_001_028), and the study was conducted according to the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Health Data (RECORD) reporting guidelines.50 These data are administrated by the Shizuoka prefectural government and access is regulated to protect personal information. The data are only available to researchers after obtaining the appropriate permissions.

Results

Study cohort

A flowchart showing the cohort selection and construction of the study cohorts is shown in Fig 1. The source cohort consisted of 2,230,848 participants. The unmatched baseline characteristics after applying the respective exclusion criteria and exposure definitions are shown in Table I. Of 459,097 hypertensive patients treated with drugs, 12,219 (2.7%) patients received medication containing HCT and 446,878 (97.3%) patients received non-HCT drugs. Compared with non-HCT users, HCT users tended to be older (>70 years, P < .001) and predominantly male (P < .001). There was a significant difference in the cumulative incidence of SC between the HCT user (46/12,219, 0.4%) and non-HCT user groups (2476/446,876, 0.6%) during a follow-up period of 7.5 years (median, 7.12 years; max 7.5 years, 2,571,073.00 person-years) (odds ratio, 0.68; P = .01).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Flow diagram of study participants. HCT, Hydrochlorothiazide.

Table I.

Demographic profiles

Variable Category HCT treatment
SMD
No (%)
Yes (%)
446,878 (97.3) 12,219 (2.7)
Age (years, SD) 78.11 (9.33) 77.63 (8.36) 0.055
Age 60 to <70 y 96,902 (21.7) 2431 (19.9) 0.190
70 to <80 y 154,219 (34.5) 4566 (37.4)
80 to <90 y 138,763 (31.1) 4300 (35.2)
90 y and above 56,994 (12.8) 922 (7.5)
Sex Men 192,702 (43.1) 4908 (40.2) 0.060
Women 254,176 (56.9) 7311 (59.8)
Comorbidities
 Cerebrovascular disease Presence 122,066 (27.3) 3565 (29.2) 0.041
 Dementia Presence 28,536 (6.4) 1127 (9.2) 0.106
 Myocardial infarction Presence 18,967 (4.2) 366 (3.0) 0.067
 Renal disease Presence 26,349 (5.9) 755 (6.2) 0.012
 Congestive heart failure Presence 94,890 (21.2) 3087 (25.3) 0.096
 Peripheral vascular disease Presence 66,871 (15.0) 2075 (17.0) 0.055
 Chronic pulmonary disease Presence 103,327 (23.1) 3009 (24.6) 0.035
 Rheumatic disease Presence 15,651 (3.5) 442 (3.6) 0.006
 Peptic ulcer disease Presence 98,530 (22.0) 2392 (19.6) 0.061
 Mild liver disease Presence 82,344 (18.4) 2152 (17.6) 0.021
 Diabetes without chronic complication Presence 12,359 (2.8) 349 (2.9) 0.005
 Diabetes with chronic complication Presence 37,977 (8.5) 1097 (9.0) 0.017
 Hemiplegia or paraplegia Presence 8223 (1.8) 183 (1.5) 0.027
 Moderate or severe liver disease Presence 1338 (0.3) 25 (0.2) 0.019
 Cardiac arrhythmias Presence 88,449 (19.8) 2343 (19.2) 0.016
 Vulvar disease Presence 33,734 (7.5) 935 (7.7) 0.004
 Pulmonary circulation disorders Presence 1590 (0.4) 37 (0.3) 0.009
 Hypertension, uncomplicated Presence 445,269 (99.6) 12,189 (99.8) 0.021
 Other neurological disorders Presence 20,891 (4.7) 591 (4.8) 0.008
 Diabetes, uncomplicated Presence 11,174 (2.5) 313 (2.6) 0.004
 Diabetes, complicated Presence 38,435 (8.6) 1108 (9.1) 0.016
 Hypothyroidism Presence 10,815 (2.4) 353 (2.9) 0.029
 Renal failure Presence 26,317 (5.9) 753 (6.2) 0.011
 Liver disease Presence 82,619 (18.5) 2159 (17.7) 0.021
 Peptic ulcer disease excluding bleeding Presence 96,758 (21.7) 2337 (19.1) 0.063
 Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases Presence 18,990 (4.2) 533 (4.4) 0.006
 Coagulopathy Presence 4979 (1.1) 155 (1.3) 0.014
 Obesity Presence 2109 (0.5) 76 (0.6) 0.020
 Weight loss Presence 1725 (0.4) 74 (0.6) 0.031
 Fluid and electrolyte disorders Presence 54,447 (12.2) 1624 (13.3) 0.033
 Blood loss anemia Presence 1119 (0.3) 41 (0.3) 0.016
 Deficiency anemia Presence 41,897 (9.4) 1296 (10.6) 0.041
 Alcohol abuse Presence 3070 (0.7) 83 (0.7) 0.001
 Drug abuse Presence 96 (0.0) 4 (0.0) 0.007
 Depression Presence 28,994 (6.5) 1000 (8.2) 0.065
 Psychoses Presence 9055 (2.0) 308 (2.5) 0.033
Medicine
 Ciclosporin Taken 595 (0.1) 14 (0.1) 0.005
 Methotrexate Taken 3244 (0.7) 69 (0.6) 0.020
 Statins Taken 446,878 (100.0) 12,197 (99.8) 0.060
Skin cancers Taken 2476 (0.6) 46 (0.4) 0.026

HCT, Hydrochlorothiazide; SMD, standardized mean difference

Skin cancers

Because of diversity in the baseline covariates between the groups, 12,197 patients from each group (HCT users and non-HCT users) were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score estimation/matching and were then compared using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. The baseline characteristics of the matched cohorts for the primary outcome indicated that they were well-balanced (standardized differences <10%) (Tables I and II).

Table II.

Demographics of matched cohorts

Variable Category HCT treatment
SMD
No (%)
Yes (%)
12,197 12,197
Age (years, SD) 77.68 (8.54) 77.63 (8.36) 0.006
Age 60 to <70 y 2440 (20.0) 2423 (19.9) 0.009
70 to <80 y 4523 (37.1) 4562 (37.4)
80 to <90 y 4291 (35.2) 4293 (35.2)
90 y and above 943 (7.7) 919 (7.5)
Sex Men 4908 (40.2) 4901 (40.2) 0.001
Women 7289 (59.8) 7296 (59.8)
Comorbidities
 Cerebrovascular disease Presence 3490 (28.6) 3559 (29.2) 0.012
 Dementia Presence 1104 (9.1) 1123 (9.2) 0.005
 Myocardial infarction Presence 323 (2.6) 365 (3.0) 0.021
 Renal disease Presence 688 (5.6) 754 (6.2) 0.023
 Congestive heart failure Presence 3123 (25.6) 3084 (25.3) 0.007
 Peripheral vascular disease Presence 2068 (17.0) 2074 (17.0) 0.001
 Chronic pulmonary disease Presence 2996 (24.6) 3007 (24.7) 0.002
 Rheumatic disease Presence 413 (3.4) 442 (3.6) 0.013
 Peptic ulcer disease Presence 2398 (19.7) 2392 (19.6) 0.001
 Mild liver disease Presence 2068 (17.0) 2151 (17.6) 0.018
 Diabetes without chronic complication Presence 301 (2.5) 349 (2.9) 0.024
 Diabetes with chronic complication Presence 1100 (9.0) 1097 (9.0) 0.001
 Hemiplegia or paraplegia Presence 163 (1.3) 183 (1.5) 0.014
 Moderate or severe liver disease Presence 17 (0.1) 25 (0.2) 0.016
 Cardiac arrhythmias Presence 2311 (18.9) 2342 (19.2) 0.006
 Vulvar disease Presence 891 (7.3) 934 (7.7) 0.013
 Pulmonary circulation disorders Presence 29 (0.2) 37 (0.3) 0.013
 Hypertension, uncomplicated Presence 12,172 (99.8) 12,167 (99.8) 0.009
 Other neurological disorders Presence 539 (4.4) 590 (4.8) 0.02
 Diabetes, uncomplicated Presence 268 (2.2) 313 (2.6) 0.024
 Diabetes, complicated Presence 1108 (9.1) 1108 (9.1) <0.001
 Hypothyroidism Presence 323 (2.6) 353 (2.9) 0.015
 Renal failure Presence 686 (5.6) 752 (6.2) 0.023
 Liver disease Presence 2072 (17.0) 2158 (17.7) 0.019
 Peptic ulcer disease excluding bleeding Presence 2350 (19.3) 2337 (19.2) 0.003
 Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases Presence 506 (4.1) 533 (4.4) 0.011
 Coagulopathy Presence 150 (1.2) 155 (1.3) 0.004
 Obesity Presence 66 (0.5) 75 (0.6) 0.01
 Weight loss Presence 64 (0.5) 74 (0.6) 0.011
 Fluid and electrolyte disorders Presence 1574 (12.9) 1624 (13.3) 0.012
 Blood loss anemia Presence 26 (0.2) 41 (0.3) 0.024
 Deficiency anemia Presence 1289 (10.6) 1292 (10.6) 0.001
 Alcohol abuse Presence 68 (0.6) 83 (0.7) 0.016
 Drug abuse Presence 4 (0.0) 4 (0.0) <0.001
 Depression Presence 943 (7.7) 1000 (8.2) 0.017
 Psychoses Presence 293 (2.4) 308 (2.5) 0.008
Medicine
 Ciclosporin Taken 8 (0.1) 14 (0.1) 0.016
 Methotrexate Taken 58 (0.5) 69 (0.6) 0.013
 Statins Taken 12,197 (100.0) 12,197 (100.0) <0.001

HCT, Hydrochlorothiazide; SMD, standardized mean difference.

The proportional hazards assumption was fulfilled. After matching propensity scores, SC occurred in 46 of 12,197 HCT users (expected 36.0 patients) (5-year incidence, 0.47%; 95% CI, 0.39%-0.55%) compared with 47 of 12,197 nonusers (expected 57.0 patients) (5-year incidence, 0.36%; 95% CI, 0.30%-0.42%). The difference was significant according to log-rank test (P = .03) and Cox hazard analysis (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04-2.40) (Fig 2).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Cumulative incident curve of skin cancers in hypertension patients treated with and without hydrochlorothiazide.

Sensitivity analysis

Because sun exposure could be critical to the induction of SC in HCT users, we further investigated if SCs in HCT users arose preferentially in sun-exposed areas. Data on the SC location was available for 2522 cases (79.9%) in the database (1457 cases in sun-exposed areas and 558 cases in sun-unexposed areas). SCs without location records were postulated to arise at unknown locations. A Cox proportional hazard regression model adjusted by covariates of age, sex, comorbidities, and drugs, including cyclosporin, methotrexate, and statins, using PS-matched groups showed an increase in the risk of SC in sun-exposed areas (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.35-3.88; log-rank test P = .0022) (Supplementary Table IA, available via Mendeley at xxx) in HCT users compared with nonusers. The incidence of SC in sun-unexposed areas was comparable between the groups (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.47-3.08; P = .70) (Supplementary Table IB, available via Mendeley at xxx). These results support the primary analysis.

Additional analysis

SC comprises various pathological types with different origins and etiologies. We further investigated which pathological types of SC were associated with HCT use. Recorded pathological data were available for 1657 SC cases (65.7%). Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) was the most frequent type (28.9%, 726 cases), followed by SCC (23.1%, 583 cases), and Bowen disease (9.1%, 229 cases). Other types of SC were not analyzed because of insufficient numbers. SCs lacking pathology records were postulated to be SCs of unknown pathology. We found a 4.99-fold increase in risk of SCC (HR, 4.99; 95% CI, 2.00-12.52) (Supplementary Table IIA, available via Mendeley at xxx) in HCT users compared with nonusers, but no increased risk of BCC (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.65-2.79) (Supplementary Table IIB, available via Mendeley at xxx) or Bowen disease (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.39-3.76) (Supplementary Table IIC, available via Mendeley at xxx).

Discussion

The results of this study demonstrated that HCT promoted the development of SC in elderly Japanese patients with hypertension. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first regional-based population retrospective cohort study in Japan using PS-matched cohorts adjusted for covariates of age, sex, major comorbid disease categories, and drugs influencing SC development. There is currently controversy regarding the effects of HCT on the development of SC in Asian, but not non-Asian patients, with some studies indicating an increased risk,18 inconclusive evidence,34,35 or a protective role36 for SC development. Although one cohort study36 was postulated to have an immortal time bias,51 we considered that the conflict might be derived from differences in the covariates selected for adjustment among the studies, such as comorbid disease categories, because unbalanced covariates will lead to an incorrect interpretation of the results and conflicting conclusions. In contrast to the PS-matched analysis in this study, the unmatched cohorts showed a marked deviation in case numbers (19/36) of comorbid disease categories between HCT and non-HCT users (P < .05, χ2 analysis), and simple analysis demonstrated no effect of HCT on the incidence of SC. This suggests that some comorbid disease categories might become confounders, and appropriate adjustment of covariates is thus crucial to detect a robust effect of HCT on SC development, as shown in this study. Although it would be preferable to analyze the relationship between the cumulative HCT dose and SC incidence, most Japanese hypertensive patients take 12.5 mg/day of HCT, and the cumulative dose thus increases in proportion to the duration of administration, and we therefore, did not carry out this analysis in the current study.

Asians, including Japanese, with dark skin phototypes III to V are relatively resistant to UV-induced oncogenesis.52 However, the current results indicated that HCT increased the risk of SC in sun-exposed sites even in Japanese patients, as in Caucasians,11 implicating the potential photocarcinogenic effect of HCT in a wider regional setting. Furthermore, this effect was closely associated with the emergence of SCC but not BCC or Bowen disease, as shown in a previous report.28 Although the reason for this difference remains unclear, it might reflect different origins and etiologies. SCC originates from keratinocytes in the upper level of the skin, to which UV can penetrate quickly. However, it remains unclear why BCC, as the most common SC in sun-exposed areas,53 was unaffected by HCT intake. Notably, intermittent, intense sun exposure carries a high risk for the development of BCC, while SCC is strongly associated with lower level chronic exposure,54 suggesting that the pathology is affected by the quality of UV radiation, which might thus also be associated with the development of HCT-associated SC. The etiology of Bowen disease is accepted to be multifactorial, in association with not only sun exposure but also arsenic exposure and human papilloma virus infection.55,56 This result is consistent with the HCT-modified UV action in SC development. Further investigations are thus needed to clarify photoprotection measures and the avoidance of HCT use to prevent SC development in such populations, as suggested previously.25

Strengths and limitations

The main strength of this study was the use of matched cohorts from a database that allowed long-term follow-up of up to 7.5 years and captured a clear outcome, that is, the development of SC. However, this study also had several limitations because all the data were derived from the SKDB. First, we could not obtain additional information about the SCs, patients’ occupations, duration of exposure to sunlight, compliance with drug administration, exact cumulative drug dose, or the severity of comorbidities. Second, diagnoses were defined using only ICD-10 codes in the medical records. Third, genetic predisposition factors were not incorporated.

Conclusion

This population-based cohort study showed that long-term use of low-dose HCT increases the risk of SC in Japanese patients with hypertension, including individuals with relatively dark skin. This was demonstrated by a significant increase in the incidence of sun-exposure–related SC and the preferential development of SCC in HCT users. These results highlight the increasing risk of SC associated with increased HCT use in aging societies worldwide.

Conflicts of interest

None disclosed.

Footnotes

Drs Hashizume and Nakatani contributed equally to this work.

Funding sources: This project was funded by Shizuoka Prefecture.

IRB approval status: Approved by the ethics committee of Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health; approval #SGUPH_2021_001_028.

References

  • 1.Byrd J.B., Bakris G., Jamerson K. The contribution of the ACCOMPLISH trial to the treatment of stage 2 hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16(3):419. doi: 10.1007/s11906-014-0419-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mulrow C.D., Cornell J.A., Herrera C.R., Kadri A., Farnett L., Aguilar C. Hypertension in the elderly. Implications and generalizability of randomized trials. JAMA. 1994;272(24):1932–1938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wright J.M., Musini V.M., Gill R. First-line drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4(4) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ibaraki A., Goto W., Iura R., Tominaga M., Tsuchihashi T. Current prescription status of antihypertensive drugs with special reference to the use of diuretics in Japan. Hypertens Res. 2017;40(2):203–206. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harber L.C., Lashinsky A.M., Baer R.L. Photosensitivity due to chlorothiazide and hydrochlorothiazide. N Engl J Med. 1959;261:1378–1381. doi: 10.1056/nejm195912312612706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Götzinger F., Reichrath J., Millenaar D., et al. Photo-induced skin reactions of cardiovascular drugs - a systematic review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022;8(4):420–430. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kunisada M., Masaki T., Ono R., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide enhances UVA-induced DNA damage. Photochem Photobiol. 2013;89(3):649–654. doi: 10.1111/php.12048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bigagli E., Cinci L., D'Ambrosio M., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers: a biological plausibility study. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/6655542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adalsteinsson J.A., Muzumdar S., Waldman R., et al. Association between hydrochlorothiazide and the risk of in situ and invasive squamous cell skin carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma: a population-based case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(3):669–675. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Daniels B., Pearson S.A., Vajdic C.M., Pottegård A., Buckley N.A., Zoega H. Risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the lip and cutaneous melanoma in older Australians using hydrochlorothiazide: a population-based case-control study. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020;127(4):320–328. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de Macedo Andrade A.C., Felix F.A., França G.M., et al. Hydrochlorothiazide use is associated with the risk of cutaneous and lip squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;78(6):919–930. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03299-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eworuke E., Haug N., Bradley M., et al. Risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer in association with use of hydrochlorothiazide-containing products in the United States. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021;5(2) doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garrido P.M., Borges-Costa J. Hydrochlorothiazide treatment and risk of non-melanoma skin cancer: review of the literature. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2020;39(3):163–170. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2019.07.008. Terapêutica com hidroclorotiazida e risco de cancro cutâneo não melanoma: revisão da literatura. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Habel L.A., Achacoso N., Fireman B., Pedersen S.A., Pottegård A. Hydrochlorothiazide and risk of melanoma subtypes. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(10):1396–1401. doi: 10.1002/pds.5266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heng Y.K., Lim Y.L. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions in the elderly. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;15(4):300–307. doi: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Humbert X., Dolladille C., Chrétien B., et al. Thiazides and nonmelanoma skin cancer: is it a class effect? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(1):e25–e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jensen A., Thomsen H.F., Engebjerg M.C., Olesen A.B., Sørensen H.T., Karagas M.R. Use of photosensitising diuretics and risk of skin cancer: a population-based case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(9):1522–1528. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim J.C., Kim Y.C., Choi J.W. Use of hydrochlorothiazide and risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer in Koreans: a retrospective cohort study using administrative healthcare data. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021;46(4):680–686. doi: 10.1111/ced.14520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kreutz R., Algharably E.A.H., Douros A. Reviewing the effects of thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics as photosensitizing drugs on the risk of skin cancer. J Hypertens. 2019;37(10):1950–1958. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.León-Muñoz L.M., Duarte-Salles T., Llorente A., et al. Use of hydrochlorothiazide and risk of skin cancer in a large nested case-control study in Spain. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(9):1269–1278. doi: 10.1002/pds.5295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mehlan J., Ueberschaar J., Hagenström K., et al. The use of HCT and/or ACE inhibitors significantly increases the risk of non-melanotic skin cancer in the periocular region. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(8):2745–2751. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05576-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Morales D.R., Pacurariu A., Slattery J., Kurz X. Association between hydrochlorothiazide exposure and different incident skin, lip and oral cavity cancers: a series of population-based nested case-control studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86(7):1336–1345. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pedersen S.A., Gaist D., Schmidt S.A.J., Hölmich L.R., Friis S., Pottegård A. Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer: a nationwide case-control study from Denmark. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(4):673–681.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pedersen S.A., Johannesdottir Schmidt S.A., Hölmich L.R., Friis S., Pottegård A., Gaist D. Hydrochlorothiazide use and risk for Merkel cell carcinoma and malignant adnexal skin tumors: a nationwide case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(2):460–465.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pottegård A., Bech B.H., Pedersen S.A., Christensen B. Use of hydrochlorothiazide in Denmark following publication of skin cancer risk findings. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(11):1611–1616. doi: 10.1002/pds.5350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pottegård A., Pedersen S.A., Schmidt S.A.J., Hölmich L.R., Friis S., Gaist D. Association of hydrochlorothiazide use and risk of malignant melanoma. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(8):1120–1122. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rouette J., Yin H., Pottegård A., Nirantharakumar K., Azoulay L. Use of hydrochlorothiazide and risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Drug Saf. 2021;44(2):245–254. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schneider R., Reinau D., Stoffel S., Jick S.S., Meier C.R., Spoendlin J. Risk of skin cancer in new users of thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics: a cohort study using an active comparator group. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(2):343–352. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shin D., Lee E.S., Kim J., Guerra L., Naik D., Prida X. Association between the use of thiazide diuretics and the risk of skin cancers: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Med Res. 2019;11(4):247–255. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tchernev G., Patterson J.W. Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide-induced nevus-associated cutaneous melanoma: first report in the medical literature. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021;14(3):289–293. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1890581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.van den Born B.H., Olde-Engberink R., Vogt L. Hydrochlorothiazide and the risk of malignant melanoma. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(10):1425. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shao S.C., Lai C.C., Chen Y.H., Lai E.C., Hung M.J., Chi C.C. Associations of thiazide use with skin cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02419-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.IARC Working Group on the Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans . Some Aromatic Amines and related Compounds. International Agency for Research on Cancer© International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon (FR): 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pottegård A., Pedersen S.A., Schmidt S.A.J., et al. Use of hydrochlorothiazide and risk of skin cancer: a nationwide Taiwanese case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2019;121(11):973–978. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0613-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee S.M., Kim K., Yoon J., et al. Association between use of hydrochlorothiazide and nonmelanoma skin cancer: common data model cohort study in Asian population. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2910. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Park E., Lee Y., Jue M.S. Hydrochlorothiazide use and the risk of skin cancer in patients with hypertensive disorder: a nationwide retrospective cohort study from Korea. Korean J Intern Med. 2020;35(4):917–928. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nakatani E., Tabara Y., Sato Y., Tsuchiya A., Miyachi Y. Data resource profile of Shizuoka Kokuho Database (SKDB) using integrated health- and care-insurance claims and health checkups: the Shizuoka Study. J Epidemiol. 2021;32:391–400. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Goto H., Nakatani E., Yagi H., Moriki M., Sano Y., Miyachi Y. Late-onset development of psoriasis in Japan: a population-based cohort study. JAAD Int. 2021;2:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2020.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hashizume H., Nakatani E., Sato Y., Goto H., Yagi H., Miyachi Y. A new susceptibility index to predict the risk of severe herpes zoster-associated pain: a Japanese regional population-based cohort study, the Shizuoka study. J Dermatol Sci. 2022;105(3):170–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2022.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kohsaka S., Kumamaru H., Nishimura S., et al. Incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients after initiation of glucose-lowering agents: a population-based community study from the Shizuoka Kokuho database. J Diabetes Investig. 2021;12(8):1452–1461. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shimada K., Yamamoto H., Nakatani E., et al. Real-world evidence of the incidence of and risk factors for type 1 diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism as immune-related adverse events associated with programmed cell death-1 inhibitors. Endocr Pract. 2021;27(6):586–593. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2020.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Quan H., Sundararajan V., Halfon P., et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–1139. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Berna R., Rosenbach M., Margolis D.J., Mitra N., Baumrin E. Methotrexate cutaneous ulceration: a systematic review of cases. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23(4):449–457. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00692-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Blue E.D., Freeman S.C., Lobl M.B., et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma arising in immunosuppressed patients: a systematic review of tumor profiling studies. JID Innov. 2022;2(4) doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Friis S., Kesminiene A., Espina C., Auvinen A., Straif K., Schüz J. European Code Against Cancer 4th edition: medical exposures, including hormone therapy, and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39(suppl 1):S107–S119. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Health.mil Surveillance case definitions. https://www.health.mil/Reference-Center/Publications/2017/06/01/Non-Melanoma-Skin-Cancer
  • 47.Hernán M.A., Robins J.M. Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not available. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(8):758–764. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.de Haan-Du J., Landman G.W.D., Groenier K.H., et al. The risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma among patients with type 2 diabetes receiving hydrochlorothiazide: a cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(11):2114–2121. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-21-0620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Carlson J.A. Tumor doubling time of cutaneous melanoma and its metastasis. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25(4):291–299. doi: 10.1097/00000372-200308000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Benchimol E.I., Smeeth L., Guttmann A., et al. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015;12(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pottegård A., Morales D. Comment on “Hydrochlorothiazide use and the risk of skin cancer in patients with hypertensive disorder: a nationwide retrospective cohort study from Korea”. Korean J Intern Med. 2020;35(4):1014–1015. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kolitz E., Lopes F., Arffa M., Pineider J., Bogucka R., Adamson A.S. UV exposure and the risk of keratinocyte carcinoma in skin of color: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(5):542–546. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rubin A.I., Chen E.H., Ratner D. Basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(21):2262–2269. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra044151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Narayanan D.L., Saladi R.N., Fox J.L. Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(9):978–986. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04474.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee M.M., Wick M.M. Bowen's disease. CA Cancer J Clin. 1990;40(4):237–242. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.40.4.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cox N.H., Eedy D.J., Morton C.A. Guidelines for management of Bowen's disease: 2006 update. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(1):11–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAD International are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES