Skip to main content
Cancer Science logoLink to Cancer Science
letter
. 2023 Mar 16;114(6):2689–2691. doi: 10.1111/cas.15784

Five‐year follow‐up of a phase II study of DA‐EPOCH‐R with high‐dose MTX in CD5‐positive DLBCL

Kana Miyazaki 1,, Rika Sakai 2, Noriko Iwaki 3, Go Yamamoto 4, Kayoko Murayama 5, Momoko Nishikori 6, Kazutaka Sunami 7, Isao Yoshida 8, Hiroki Yano 9, Naoki Takahashi 10, Akinao Okamoto 11, Saori Munemoto 12, Aiko Sawazaki 13, Youko Suehiro 14, Noriko Fukuhara 15, Atsushi Wake 16, Ayako Arai 17, Yasufumi Masaki 18, Kohtaro Toyama 19, Akihiro Yokoyama 20, Hiroko Tsunemine 21, Yuichi Hasegawa 22, Kenji Matsumoto 23, Tomomi Yamada 24, Yuki Nishimura 1, Satoshi Tamaru 1, Naoko Asano 25, Kohta Miyawaki 26, Koji Izutsu 27, Tomohiro Kinoshita 28, Ritsuro Suzuki 29, Koichi Ohshima 30, Koji Kato 26, Naoyuki Katayama 1, Motoko Yamaguchi 1
PMCID: PMC10236623  PMID: 36929591

Abbreviations

ABC

activated B‐cell‐like

CI

confidence interval

CNS

central nervous system

COO

cell‐of‐origin

DLBCL

diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

EPOCH‐R

etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab

IPI

International Prognostic Index

MTX

methotrexate

OS

overall survival

PFS

progression‐free survival

PS

performance status

Dear Editor,

CD5‐positive (CD5+) DLBCL is characterized by aggressive clinical characteristics and frequent CNS relapse. 1 In 2020, we reported the results of the primary analysis of a phase 2 study of dose‐adjusted (DA)‐EPOCH‐R combined with high‐dose (HD)‐MTX (DA‐EPOCH‐R/HD‐MTX) (PEARL5 study) with a median follow‐up of 3.1 years. 2 In this letter, we report the results of our preplanned 5‐year follow‐up of this study.

At a median follow‐up time of 6.0 (range, 5.0–7.7) years, the 5‐year PFS and OS of 47 eligible patients were 72% (90% CI, 57–83; 95% CI, 57–83) and 79% (90% CI, 67–87; 95% CI, 64–88), respectively (Figure 1A,B). One patient experienced a relapse in the cervical lymph nodes, Waldeyer's ring, and nasal cavity after the primary analysis. The 5‐year PFS and OS of patients with CD5+ ABC DLBCL (n = 39) were 72% and 74%, respectively (Figure 2A,B).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Survival curves for patients with CD5‐positive (CD5+) DLBCL with a median follow‐up of 6.0 years. (A) PFS and (B) OS for all patients (n = 47).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Survival according to COO categories. (A) PFS and (B) OS according to COO categories (n = 46).

The 5‐year CNS relapse rate was 9% (95% CI, 3–22) (Figure 3A). There were no CNS relapse events after the primary analysis. There was no significant difference in the CNS relapse rate among the CNS‐IPI categories (data not shown). In our previous retrospective study of CD5+ DLBCL, CNS events occurred in 13% of the patients at the median follow‐up of 6.8 years, and half of them were documented after 2 years of diagnosis. 3 Given that no CNS events were observed in the present phase 2 study, the treatment protocol may have contributed to the prevention of late CNS relapse.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Probability of CNS relapse in CD5+ DLBCL patients (n = 47).

No patients experienced grade 3 or higher late toxicity. There was no cardiovascular event and leukoencephalopathy during this follow‐up. Second malignancies were reported in six patients (6%) and all were above 60 years of age (Table S1). Among them, two patients who had colon cancers were successfully treated with endoscopic resection. Among two patients who died during this follow‐up, one died of a second malignancy.

Our updated analysis confirmed that both excellent efficacy and safety of DA‐EPOCH‐R/HD‐MTX were maintained for more than 5 years, indicating that DA‐EPOCH‐R/HD‐MTX is one of the most reasonable first‐line treatments for stage II–IV CD5+ DLBCL (UMIN000008507; jRCTs041180159).

FUNDING INFORMATION

This study was supported by grants‐in‐aid from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED (JP15Ack0106157, JP16ck0106157, JP17ck0106157, JP18ck0106439), the Ministry of Labour, Health, and Welfare of Japan (201438142A), the director of Mie University Hospital (2012, 2013), and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (26‐A‐4, 29‐A‐3).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

KMiyazaki reports research funding (Kyowa Kirin, Zenyaku). RSakai reports honoraria (Chugai, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, Bristol Myers Squibb); research funding (Chugai, Kyowa Kirin). KS reports honoraria (Bristol Myers Squibb); research funding (Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Kyowa Kirin). IY reports honoraria (Chugai, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda); research funding (Chugai, Kyowa Kirin); NT reports honoraria (Takeda); research funding (Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin). YS reports honoraria (Chugai, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer); research funding (Chugai, Kyowa Kirin). NF reports honoraria (Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, Zenyaku); research funding (Chugai). AA reports research funding (Chugai). YM reports research funding (Kyowa Kirin, Asahi Kasei, Takeda, Chugai). AY reports honoraria (Kyowa Kirin, Chugai, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb); research funding (Kyowa Kirin). KMiyawaki reports honoraria (Chugai). KI reports research funding (Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Kyowa Kirin, Chugai). RSuzuki reports honoraria (Chugai, Kyowa Kirin, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda); research funding (Chugai, Kyowa Kirin, Shionogi). KK reports honoraria (Kyowa Kirin, Chugai); research funding (Chugai, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, Bristol Myers Squibb). NK reports research funding (Kyowa Kirin). MY reports research funding (Kyowa Kirin, Chugai). The other authors have nothing to disclose. Tomohiro Kinoshita, Koichi Ohshima, and Ritsuro Suzuki are editorial board members of Cancer Science.

ETHICS STATEMENT

Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Review Board: The study was approved by the protocol review committee of the study and the institutional review board of each institution in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Registry and the registration no. of the study/trial: UMIN000008507; jRCTs041180159.

Animal studies: N/A.

Supporting information

Table S1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to thank Takuya Matsunaga (Hokuou Hospital), Noriko Usui (The Jikei University School of Medicine), and Akiko Kada (Nagoya Medical Center) as members of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Miyazaki K, Yamaguchi M, Suzuki R, et al. CD5‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a retrospective study in 337 patients treated by chemotherapy with or without rituximab. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1601‐1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Miyazaki K, Asano N, Yamada T, et al. DA‐EPOCH‐R combined with high‐dose methotrexate in patients with newly diagnosed stage II‐IV CD5‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a single‐arm, open‐label, phase II study. Haematologica. 2020;105:2308‐2315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yamaguchi M, Nakamura N, Suzuki R, et al. De novo CD5+ diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: results of a detailed clinicopathological review in 120 patients. Haematologica. 2008;93:1195‐1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1


Articles from Cancer Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES