Abstract
Induction of effective immunity in the lungs should be a requisite for any vaccine designed to control the severe pathogenic effects generated by respiratory infectious agents. We recently provided evidence that the generation of endogenous extracellular vesicles (EVs) engineered for the incorporation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 Nucleocapsid (N) protein induced immunity in the lungs of K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, which then can survive the lethal virus infection. However, nothing is known about the ability of the N-specific CD8+ T cell immunity in controlling viral replication in the lungs, a major pathogenic signature of severe disease in humans. To fill the gap, we investigated the immunity generated in the lungs by N-engineered EVs in terms of induction of N-specific effectors and resident memory CD8+ T lymphocytes before and after virus challenge carried out three weeks and three months after boosting. At the same time points, viral replication extents in the lungs were evaluated. Three weeks after the second immunization, virus replication was reduced in mice best responding to vaccination by more than 3-logs compared to the control group. The impaired viral replication matched with a reduced induction of Spike-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes. The antiviral effect appeared similarly strong when the viral challenge was carried out 3 months after boosting, and associated with the persistence of N-specific CD8+ T-resident memory lymphocytes. In view of the quite low mutation rate of the N protein, the present vaccine strategy has the potential to control the replication of all emerging variants.
Subject terms: Vaccines, Infectious diseases
Introduction
Several vaccines were developed and distributed within an unprecedentedly short time in response to the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2. All vaccine preparations were conceived to elicit anti-Spike protein immune responses, and their effectiveness relies on the generation of neutralizing antibodies. Administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines leads to the production of extraordinarily high levels of anti-Spike antibodies in serum1,2. Regrettably, however, in humans the generation of Spike-binding antibodies at the viral port of entry, i.e., the mucosa of the upper respiratory tract, does not result in a significant virus neutralization activity3–7. In addition, anti-Spike immunity in lungs of vaccinees was found either barely detectable or absent8.
The virtual absence of Spike-specific cell immunity in lungs of vaccinees is not surprising given that the vaccine is administrated intramuscularly. In fact, it is known that the development of cell immunity in pulmonary tissues is largely independent of the events occurring in both peripheral circulation and distal lymphoid organs. Lymphocytes in lungs are maintained separately from the pool of circulating lymphocytes, and their continuous loss through intraepithelial migration toward the airways is constantly replenished by homeostatic proliferation9. In this scenario, the identification of new anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines eliciting adequate antiviral immunity in lungs would be of outmost relevance.
All cell types constitutively release nanovesicles (collectively referred to as extracellular vesicles, EVs), which are key players in intercellular communication10. We developed a CD8+ T-cell-based vaccine platform based on intramuscular (i.m.) injection of a DNA vector coding for antigens of interest fused at the C-terminus of a biologically inactive Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Type 1 Nef protein (Nefmut) having an unusually high efficiency of incorporation into EVs. This unique feature is maintained even when foreign polypeptides are fused to its C-terminus11,12. Both N-terminal myristoylation and palmitoylation fasten Nefmut to the luminal membrane leaflets, thus allowing its abundant uploading into EVs. Upon i.m. injection of DNA vectors expressing Nefmut-derivatives, nanovesicles containing antigens fused with Nefmut are released by muscle cells, can freely circulate into the body, and can be internalized by antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Thereby, EV-associated antigens are cross-presented to prime antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes13.
We already tested the efficacy of the Nucleocapsid (N)-specific CD8+ T cell immunity elicited by EVs engineered in vivo for the incorporation of SARS-CoV-2 N protein14 in survival assays carried out on K18-hACE2 transgenic mice15. These mice replicate SARS-CoV-2 by virtue of the expression of the human ACE2 receptor expressed under the control of a human cytokeratin-18 promoter which allows viral entry in epithelial cells16. However, it was reproducibly shown that the heavy pathogenic effects observed in infected mice essentially rely on viral invasion of central nervous system, while the infection in lung tissues contributes to the overall health decay and weight loss only marginally17–20. Nevertheless, SARS-CoV-2 replicates in lungs of K18-hACE2 mice as efficiently as in lungs of infected humans16. To evaluate the translation relevance of our vaccine strategy, we were interested in testing the efficacy of the EV-induced N-specific immunity in counteracting the viral replication in lungs. To this end, both CD8+ T cell immunity and viral loads in lungs were measured in mice challenged 3 weeks or 3 months after immunization. The results showing a strong viral inhibition in lungs of N-immunized mice pave the way toward the design of second-generation anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines which, considering the extremely low variability of N protein, could be effective against emerging variants.
Results
Induction of N-specific CD8+ T polyfunctional and CD8+ T resident memory lymphocytes in the lungs
K18-hACE2 transgenic mice were inoculated twice 2 weeks apart with vectors expressing either Nefmut (6 mice) or Nefmut/SARS-CoV-2 N fusion protein (9 mice) following the experimental flow depicted in Fig. 1. From 10 to 15 days thereafter, N-specific CD8+ T cell immunity was evaluated in both spleen and lungs, in the latter case by exploiting the intravenous injection of a fluorescent anti-CD45 antibody to identify lymphocytes residing in both alveolar and interstitial compartments as the CD45-/CD3+ cell sub-population21. IFN-γ EliSpot analysis for the detection of N-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes in spleens was carried out using the N219–228 peptide, and revealed a mean of more than 250 spots/2.5 × 105 total splenocytes from vaccinated mice (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 1), whereas mice injected with Nefmut-expressing DNA scored negative. By ICS/flow cytometry analysis, we found that immunization gave rise to a mean of 5.7% of N-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes, in the presence of a mean of more than 2% of polyfunctional (i.e., co-expressing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α), N-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes (Fig. 2b–d, Supplementary Fig. 2). When the ICS analysis was carried out in the CD45 negative fraction of cells isolated from lungs (which identified tissue-specific immune cells), higher percentages of both IFN-γ expressing and polyfunctional N-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes were found (Fig. 3a–c, Supplementary Fig. 3). In addition, and of a major importance, a well distinguishable population of N-specific T-resident memory (Trm, i.e., CD44+, CD49a+, CD69+, CD103+, IFN-γ+) CD8+ T lymphocytes was found in the lungs of vaccinated mice (Fig. 3d). Notably, a positive correspondence between the percentages of N-specific circulatory and lung CD8+ T cells can be found in Nefmut/N injected mice (Supplementary Fig. 4). Of note, due to the limited number of recovered cells, cultures from lungs were set by pooling cells from two/three infected mice per group.
We concluded that the immunization with Nefmut/N expressing vector induced a strong N-specific CD8+ T cell immunity in lung tissues associating with the generation of a sub-population of N-specific CD8+ Trm lymphocytes.
The Nefmut fusion is critical for the induction of N-specific immunity in the lungs
We previously reported that the fusion of Nefmut with either HPV16-E6 or -E7 viral proteins was critical for the induction of an effective antigen-specific CD8+ T cell immunity in circulating cells22. To test whether the Nefmut fusion is necessary for the generation of N-specific immunity in the lungs as well, we immunized K18-hACE2 transgenic mice by injecting DNA vectors expressing either N alone or Nefmut/N following the above reported prime-boost design. Results from preliminary western blot experiments carried out on EVs isolated from supernatants of transiently transfected 293T cells showed that, as expected, the N protein did not associate with EVs when expressed alone (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 5).
Fifteen days after the second immunization, immune cells from both blood and lungs of injected mice were isolated. The results from the analysis of both polyfunctional and resident memory N-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes in the lungs showed the lack of N-specific cells in mice injected with the DNA vector expressing N alone, in the presence of the induction of a limited number of N-specific, circulatory CD8+ T lymphocytes. Conversely, and as expected, the CD8+ T cell-specific immune response was readily detectable in cells from lungs of mice injected with the Nefmut/N-expressing DNA, in the presence of a higher number of N-specific circulatory CD8+ T lymphocytes (Fig. 4b–d).
These data support the idea that the generation of engineered EVs dictated by the Nefmut-fusion was a key step for the induction of N-specific CD8+ T cell immunity in the lungs.
Impaired SARS-CoV-2 replication in lungs of Nefmut/N-immunized mice
The effectiveness of any antiviral vaccine strategy should be evaluated in terms of its efficacy in reducing viral replication in the target tissue. In the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the assessment should be focused on the lungs, considering that in humans Covid-19-related severe disease and death are correlated with an uncontrolled viral replication in pulmonary alveoli. To this aim, in a third immunization experiment, mice (6 per group) were injected with either Nefmut or Nefmut/N DNA vectors, and actual immunization was checked fifteen days after the second immunization by IFN-γ EliSpot assay on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs, Fig. 5a). After additional 7 days, mice were infected intranasally (i.n.) with 4.4 lethal doses of SARS-CoV-2, and the lungs were isolated 4–6 days thereafter. Lung tissues were then processed for the extraction and purification of total RNA. RT-qPCR analysis was finally carried out to enumerate the copy numbers of SARS-CoV-2 N-related RNA molecules. Overall, we found that virus replicated in lungs of N-vaccinated mice more than 60-fold less efficiently than in control mice (Fig. 5b; two-tailed Mann–Whitney U Test, p = 0.0022). Consistently with what previously reported in survival assays15, the inhibition of virus replication appeared most effective (i.e., more than 3.5 logs of reduction) in mice that had developed stronger N-specific immune responses. In line with this observation, two-tailed Spearman Rank Correlation Test showed a negative correlation between pre-challenge N-specific IFN-γ EliSpot and days 4 and 6-cumulative results of RT-qPCR assays on N viral gene (Spearman R = −1, p = 0.0028) (Fig. 5c).
Intranasal SARS-CoV-2 infection does not affect the pre-existing N-specific cell immunity in lungs
It is well known that SARS-CoV-2 replication in lungs couples with hyper-inflammation and profound immune dysregulation23,24. Hence, we next were interested in monitoring whether and to what extent SARS-CoV-2 infection influenced the state of SARS-CoV-2-N-specific immunity in both circulating cells and lungs of vaccinated mice. To this aim, PBMCs recovered from infected mice were analyzed at both 4 and 6 days after challenge by IFN-γ EliSpot and ICS/flow cytometry assays using either N219–228 or Spike539–546 peptides (Fig. 6a, b). We noticed that at day 6 post-infection the Spike-specific CD8+ T cell immunity jumped dramatically in control mice, whereas it increased at apparently lower extents in N-vaccinated ones in the presence of a persistent N-specific immunity. Analysis on cumulative results from day 4- and day 6-N-specific IFN-γ EliSpot assay showed a statistically significant higher N-specific response in Nefmut/N vaccinated mice compared to control animals (two-tailed Student T Test with Welch correction, p = 0.0015). When the ICS/flow cytometry analysis was carried out in cells isolated from the lungs of mice 6 days after challenge, high levels of both Spike- and N-specific CD8+ T cell immunity were found in control mice that conversely appeared lower in Nefmut/N-immunized group (Fig. 6c).
These data indicated that the infection did not relevantly affect the levels of N-specific immunity in lungs of N-vaccinated mice.
Persistent N-specific CD8+ T cell immunity in lungs of vaccinated mice
The persistence of immune protection over time is a mandatory feature for any vaccine. In the case of EV-induced N-specific CD8+ T cell immunity, the prompt generation of an antigen-specific CD8+ Trm sub-population in lungs was suggestive of a durable immune response. To test this hypothesis, the N-specific immune response was monitored three months after the second shot in a fourth immunization experiment. IFN-γ EliSpot analysis on splenocytes isolated from four mice per group showed the persistence of N-specific circulatory CD8+ T lymphocytes (Fig. 7a), although at reduced levels compared to what observed three weeks after the second injection. The lungs of these mice were explanted after intravenous injection of fluorescently labeled anti-CD45 mAb. Then, the immune cells were isolated, and cultures each formed by pooling the cells from two mice were run in the presence of either N-specific or unspecific peptides. Authentically lung-associated cells were identified by flow cytometry analysis as the CD45 unlabeled cell fraction. Notably, N-specific lung Trm scored more than 9% of total lung CD8+ Trm in mice injected with the Nefmut/N vector (Fig. 7b). In addition, the percentages over the total of lung CD8+ T lymphocytes (Fig. 7c) apparently increased compared to those observed 2 weeks after boosters. These results were in line with the hypothesis that the injection of Nefmut/N DNA vector generated a long-lasting immunity in lungs.
Antiviral activity in lungs three months after immunization
Finally, we were interested to establish whether the persistence of N-specific Trm in lungs of vaccinated mice associated with an antiviral state. Six mice from the last immunization experiment were infected i.n. with the identical experimental conditions used in the previous challenges. In view of the already described activation effect of Nefmut on immature dendritic cells25, which would favor the natural antiviral immune response, a group of six mice injected with saline solution (sham) was included in the challenge experiment. The RT-qPCR analysis of total RNA isolated from lungs 4–6 days after challenge showed an overall drop of virus replication extent in N-immunized mice compared to controls (Fig. 8a) similarly to what observed upon challenge three weeks after boost. Kruskal–Wallis Test followed by Dunn’s Multiple Comparisons Test showed a statistically significant control of infection in Nefmut/N-vaccinated mice compared to the sham group in terms of mean of N-related viral gene copies, with p < 0.01. Interestingly, the immune response induced by Nefmut alone seemed to contribute to the total antiviral effect induced by the immunization against Nefmut/N. The infection generated a potent Spike-related CD8+ T cell immune response in control mice, as assessed by IFN-γ EliSpot analysis carried out on PBMCs isolated at both 4 and 6 days after challenge. Differently, the Spike-specific CD8+ T cell immune response in N-immunized mice was elicited at lower levels (Kruskal–Wallis Test followed by Dunn’s Multiple Comparisons Test, Nefmut/N-vaccinees vs sham mice, at day 6: p < 0.05), in the presence of an N-specific immunity not diminished compared to pre-infection levels (Fig. 8b).
Taken together, these data support the idea that CD8+ T N-specific immunity induced in lungs can control virus replication three months after boosting.
Discussion
Respiratory airways are the battlefield where the fate of persons infected by SARS-CoV-2 is determined. The efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines would be the result of promptness, potency, and durability of the immune response evoked in both upper and lower respiratory tracts. In humans, current mRNA-based vaccines have been shown to induce immune responses quantitatively limited and qualitatively incomplete in both tracts26. Second-generation vaccines are expected to overcome such limitations by focusing their immunogenic activity at pulmonary level. In this perspective, we investigated the potentialities of an innovative anti-SARS-CoV-2 CD8+ T cell-based vaccine consisting in engineered EVs spontaneously released by muscle cells incorporating the SARS-CoV-2 N protein. They are produced upon i.m. injection of a DNA vector expressing the SARS-CoV-2 N protein fused at the C-terminus of Nefmut, i.e., an EV-anchoring protein incorporating in EVs at very high efficiency even when fused with heterologous proteins27. Of importance, we previously demonstrated that Nefmut-dependent antigen incorporation into EVs is critical for the induction of circulatory antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes, which were induced much less efficiently when the antigen was expressed alone22. The here presented data extend this finding to the antigen-specific CD8+ T cell immunity induced in lungs, i.e., a distal tissue district respect to the injection site.
This model has been previously investigated in survival assays using K18-hACE2 transgenic mice and SARS-CoV-2 N engineered EVs as immunogen15. However, such an animal model recapitulates the Covid-19 pathogenesis occurring in humans only partly. In fact, results from different papers demonstrated that, upon i.n. challenge, the most evident clinical signs of infection derive almost exclusively from the viral neuroinvasion, with cells of olfactory bulbs acting as viral port of entry17–20. Hence, evaluating the efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 compounds in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice by measuring weight loss, ataxia, and death could lead to results of not obvious significance for humans. Conversely, since SARS-CoV-2 replicates efficiently in human lungs, monitoring the antiviral effects in terms of virus replication in lungs of transgenic mice would be much more informative for a possible translation in humans.
Using fluorescent EVs, several authors demonstrated that circulating EVs diffuse in lungs quite efficiently28–31. We assume that engineered EVs emerging from muscle cells expressing Nefmut/N fusion products freely circulate into the body reaching mediastinal lymph nodes and lung germinal centers, where N-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes are activated, leading to the generation of N-specific CD8+ Trm also. This mechanism might explain how a distal i.m. injection could result in a sustained cell immunity in lungs.
We measured the viral replication levels in lungs of vaccinated mice through RT-qPCR analysis.
Several authors reported that the i.n. infection of K18-hACE2 transgenic mice leads to a peak of virus replication in the lungs after 2–3 days17,19,32–34. The extents of viral replication then decrease, remaining stable until days 7 post challenge33,34. These evidences justified the gathering of data we obtained with lungs excised at days 4 and 6 after infection.
In the evaluation of these data, it should be considered that, despite the high sensitivity of the assay, it could not distinguish RNA viral molecules incorporated into infectious viral particles from those associated with non-infectious ones. On the other hand, the assay cannot discriminate cell-associated viral RNA molecules which will be allocated in emerging viral particles. In addition, one should consider the antiviral mechanism on the basis of the CD8+ T cell immunity. In fact, differently from neutralizing antibodies which prevent the entry of virus into target cells, virus-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes can control viral replication by recognizing and destroying cells exposing virus-related peptides loaded on MHC Class I, when high levels of intracellular viral RNA have been already produced. Finally, besides controlling the virus spread, the CD8+ T cell-mediated killing of infected cells would be beneficial also in terms of the generation of an environment facilitating the antiviral action of the natural immune response.
RT-qPCR data obtained in mice challenged 3 months after immunization suggested that the response to Nefmut alone might be part of the total antiviral effect observed in mice injected with Nefmut/N.
In view of the previously documented activation effect of Nefmut on dendritic cells (DCs)25, it is tempting to speculate that the total, i.e., natural plus vaccine-induced, N-specific CD8+ T cell immune response would be favored by a sort of persistent pre-activation state (i.e., trained immunity) of pulmonary dendritic cells induced by Nefmut after internalization of engineered EVs. Notably, in light of these considerations based on the results obtained three months after boosting, it cannot be excluded that the Nefmut/N-induced antiviral effect observed 3 weeks after last immunizations was underestimated.
We noticed that the levels of emerging Spike-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes in lungs appeared reduced in vaccinated mice compared to control ones. We assumed that this effect was consequence of the inhibitory effect on viral replication. On the other hand, the detection of a quantitatively similar N-specific sub-population of CD8+ Trm lymphocytes both 3 weeks and 3 months after boosting was strongly suggestive of the establishment of a long-lasting anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunity at lungs. The strong reduction of viral replication extents we detected 3 months after vaccination was in line with this idea. Considering that it was largely demonstrated that lung CD8+ Trm can duplicate even in absence of antigenic stimulus35, it is conceivable that this antiviral immunity has the potential to persist for a very long time. Based on here presented experimental evidences, lung N-specific CD8+ Trm might be considered the most appropriate immunologic correlate of the observed inhibition of viral replication in lungs.
Our study presents a number of limitations. First, virus loads from lungs of challenged mice were not evaluated in terms of infectious units. However, a strict correlation between viral titers and number of RNA copies in lungs of SARS-CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2 mice has been previously demonstrated17, and in many instances viral loads were measured exclusively in terms of number of RNA copies, as in the assessment report for the efficacy evaluation of the Spikevax vaccine in K18-hACE2 mice36. Additional limitations are as follows: the antiviral effect in lungs of vaccinated mice was evaluated using a single, very high viral dose, i.e., 4.4. LD50; dose-response experiments with different amounts of injected DNA are lacking; the contribution to the overall antiviral effect of an N-specific CD4+ T lymphocyte response in lungs cannot be excluded; and no data concerning the phenotypic cell signature of Nefmut/N-induced CD8+ T lymphocytes are available. On this subject, due to the several peculiarities of the Nefmut-based vaccine platform, e.g., the need of EVs for antigen delivery, the absence of adjuvants, and the intrinsic ability of Nefmut to activate DCs25, one may speculate that the CD8+ T cell signature would be unique and differing, for instance, from that recently described for a peptide-based CD8+ T cell-specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine37.
Due to its quite limited variability, N protein represents a privileged immunologic target to fight emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Notably, it was reported that N-specific T cells showed cross-reactivity among different endemic human Coronaviruses, and their numbers correlated with protection against severe Covid-19 disease38. In addition, the number of both N-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T circulating lymphocytes was shown to inversely correlate with inflammation and viral load in upper airways39.
Intranasal vaccines would represent a complementation/amelioration of current vaccines, which are not effective enough to impede virus replication in respiratory mucosa40–44. On this subject, the intranasal administration in mice of an anti-SARS-CoV, CD4+ T cell-specific vaccine was found more effective than its i.m. injection45. More recently, an intranasal Sendai virus vector-derived anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was shown to induce a powerful antiviral CD8+ T cell immunity46. The presented results, together with those very recently published regarding the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 N-engineered EVs in ex vivo human cells47, can be instrumental to the design of a second-generation, innovative anti-Covid-19 vaccine based on mucosal administration of N-engineered EVs. In this way, optimal levels of CD8+ T cell immunity should be achieved at the viral port of entry.
Methods
DNA constructs
Open-reading frames coding for either Nefmut alone or fused with SARS-CoV-2 N protein were cloned into pVAX1 DNA vector (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). To obtain the pVAX1 vector expressing Nefmut, its open reading frame was cloned into Nhe I and EcoR I sites. To recover the vector expressing Nefmut-N, an intermediate vector referred to as pVAX1/Nefmutfusion was produced. Here, the whole Nefmut ORF deprived of its stop codon was followed by a sequence coding a GPGP linker including a unique Apa I restriction site. In this way, N sequences comprising the Apa I site at their 5’ end, and the Pme I one at their 3’ end were fused in frame with Nefmut open reading frame. Stop codons of SARS-CoV-2-related sequences were preceded by sequences coding for a DYKDDDK epitope tag (flag-tag). In the Nefmut/N construct, the entire open reading frame for N protein (422 aa), except the M1 amino acid, was part of the fusion product. To express the SARS-CoV-2 N protein, the entire sequence from the SARS-CoV-2/Italy INMI1#52284 (SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, isolate Italy-INMI1, NR-52284, deposited by Dr. Maria R. Capobianchi for distribution through BEI Resources, NIAID, and NIH) was cloned into the pVAX1 vector, with a flag-tag inserted just before the stop codon. SARS-CoV-2 sequences were optimized for expression in human cells through GenSmart™ Codon Optimization software from Genescript (Piscataway, NJ). All vectors were synthesized by OfficinaeBio (Venice, Italy).
Animals and authorizations
Six-week-old, female C57 Bl/6 K18-hACE2 transgenic mice were purchased from Charles River (Calco, Italy) and hosted at the Central and BSL3 Animal Facilities of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, as approved by the Italian Ministry of Health, authorizations 565/2020 and 591/2021, and released on 3 June 2020 and 30 July 2021, respectively. Before the first procedure, Datamars (Lugano, Switzerland) microchips were inserted subcutaneously on the dorsal midline between the shoulder blades.
Mice immunization
Isoflurane-anesthetized mice were inoculated i.m. with 10 μg of DNA in 30 μL of sterile, 0.9% saline solution. DNA injection was immediately followed by electroporation at the site of inoculation with an Agilpulse BTX (Holliston, MA) device, using a 4-needle electrode array (4 mm gap, 5 mm needle length), and applying the following parameters: 1 pulse of 450 V for 50 μs; 0.2 ms interval; 1 pulse of 450 V for 50 μs; 50 ms interval; 8 pulses of 110 V for 10 ms with 20 ms intervals. Mice were immunized into both quadriceps, twice, 2 weeks apart. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation.
IFN-γ EliSpot analysis
Either 2.5 (for splenocytes) or 1 (for peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PBMCs) ×105 live cells were seeded in triplicate in microwells of 96-multiwell plates (Millipore, Burlington, MA) previously coated with 1:100 diluted anti-mouse IFN- AN18 mAb (Mabtech, Nacka Strand, Sweden, cat. 3321-3-250) in RPMI 1640, 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS, Gibco, Thermo Fisher), and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol. Cell cultures were carried out for 16 h in the presence of 5 μg/mL of CD8-specific H2-b-binding SARS-CoV-2 Spike: 539–546 VNFNFNGL48, N: 219–228 ALALLLLDRL49, or Nef: 48–56 TAATNADCA50 peptide. As negative controls, 5 μg/mL of unrelated H2-b binding peptides were used. Peptide preparations were obtained from BEI resources. To check for cell responsiveness, 10 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) plus 500 ng/mL of ionomycin (Sigma) were added to the cultures. After 16 h, the cells were discarded, and the plate was incubated for 2 h at room temperature with 1:1000 diluted R4-6A2 biotinylated anti-IFN-γ antibody (Mabtech, cat. 3321-6-250) at the concentration of 100 μg/mL. Wells were then washed and treated for 1 h at room temperature with 1:1000 diluted streptavidin-ALP from Mabtech. Afterward, 100 μL/well of SigmaFast BCIP/NBT were added to the wells to develop spots. Spot-forming cells were finally analyzed and counted using an AELVIS EliSpot reader (Hannover, Germany).
Cell isolation from spleens, blood, and lungs
PBMCs were recovered from EDTA-blood samples obtained through retro-orbital puncture under topical anesthesia. Erythrocytes were removed by treatment with ACK lysing buffer (Gibco) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
To isolate splenocytes, spleens were explanted, placed into tubes containing 1 mL of RPMI 1640 and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, then transferred into 60 mm Petri dishes with 2 mL of the same medium. Splenocytes were obtained by notching the spleen sac and pushing the cells out with the plunger seal of a 1 mL syringe. After addition of 2 mL of medium, cells were transferred into a 15 mL conical tube, and the Petri plate washed with 4 mL of medium to maximize cell recovery. Afterward, cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in RPMI complete medium containing 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol and 10% FCS, and counted.
For lung cell isolation, circulating blood cells were fluorescently labeled with 2 μg (10 µl of the commercial stock) of an anti-CD45 antibody (Tonbo-Bioscience, S. Diego, CA anti-mouse CD45.2-APC, cat. 20-04540U100) diluted in 200 µl of 1×PBS inoculated in the tail vein exactly 3 min before cervical dislocation. For cell recovery, lungs were excised, washed with 1×PBS, cut into small pieces, and then digested for 30 min under gentle agitation at 37 °C with 7 mL of 4 mg/mL of type III collagenase (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ) and 0.05 mg/mL of DNase I (Sigma) in 1×PBS. After digestion, an equal volume of medium was added and cells were passed through a 70 µm cell strainer, washed, and resuspended in 1×PBS/ACK 1:1 for red blood cells lysis. Finally, the isolated cells were resuspended in complete culture medium and counted.
Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and flow cytometry analysis
Cells collected from blood, spleens, and lungs were cultured at 1 × 107/mL in RPMI medium, 10% FCS, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 1 µg/mL brefeldin A (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and in the presence of 5 μg/mL of either Spike, N, or unrelated H2-b CD8+ T-specific peptides. Positive controls were conducted by adding 10 ng/mL PMA (Sigma) plus 1 µg/mL ionomycin (Sigma). After 16 h, cells were stained with 1 µL of LIVE/DEAD Fixable FVD-eFluor506 Dead Cell reagent (Invitrogen Thermo Fisher) in 1 mL of 1×PBS for 30 min at 4 °C, and excess dye removed by 2 washes with 500 µL of 1×PBS. Non-specific staining was minimized by pre-incubating cells with 0.5 µg of Fc blocking mAbs (i.e., anti-CD16/CD32 antibodies, Invitrogen/eBioscience Thermo Fisher, cat. 12-7021-82) in 100 µL of 1×PBS with 2% FCS for 15 min at 4 °C. Staining for cell surface markers was performed upon incubation for 1 h at 4 °C with 2 µL of the following anti-mouse Abs: FITC-conjugated anti-CD3 (clone 17A2, cat. 555274, BD Biosciences), APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD8a (clone53-6.7, cat. 557654, BD Biosciences), PerCP-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5, cat. 553052, BD Biosciences), and BUV395-conjugated anti-CD44 (clone IM7, cat. 740215, BD Biosciences). CD8+ T-resident memory (Trm) cells were identified by staining with BUV750-conjugated anti-CD49a (clone Ha31/8, cat. 746854, BD Biosciences), PECF594-conjugated anti-CD69 (clone H1.2F3, cat. 562455, BD Biosciences), and BUV563-conjugated anti-CD103 (clone M290, cat. 741261, BD Biosciences). For intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), cells were fixed and permeabilized using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Thereafter, cells were labeled for 1 h at 4 °C with 2 µL of the following Abs: PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-IFN-γ (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher, clone XMG1.2, cat. 25-7311-82), PE-conjugated anti-IL-2 (Invitrogen/eBioscience Thermo Fisher, clone JES6-5H4, cat. 12-7021-82), and BV421 rat anti-TNF-α (BD Biosciences, clone MP6-XT22, cat. 563387) in a total of 100 µL of 1× Perm/Wash Buffer (BD Biosciences). After two washes, cells were fixed in 200 µL of 1× PBS/formaldehyde (2% v/v). Samples were then acquired by a CyotFLEX LX (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) flow cytometer and analyzed using Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter). Gating strategy was as follows (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3): live cells as assessed by LIVE/DEAD dye vs. FSC-A, singlet cells from FSC-A vs. FSC-H (singlet 1) and SSC-A vs. SSC-W (singlet 2), CD3+ cells from CD3-FITC vs. SSC-A, CD8+, or CD4+ cells from CD8-APC-Cy7 vs. CD4-PerCP. CD3+/CD8+ cell population was gated against CD44+ cells, and, to detect polyfunctional CD8+ T lymphocytes, the population of cells positive for both CD8 and CD44 was analyzed for APC-Cy7, PE, and BV421 to detect simultaneous changes in IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α production, respectively. To detect CD8+ T resident memory (Trm), the population of cells positive for both CD8 and CD44 was analyzed for the co-expression of CD49a, CD69, and CD103. Boolean gates were created to measure co-expression patterns.
Western blot analysis
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells (ATCC, CRL-11268) were grown in DMEM (Gibco) plus 10% FCS (Gibco). Transfection assays were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific)-based method. 293T cells were transfected with vectors expressing either N or Nefmut/N, and supernatants harvested from 48 to 72 h after transfection. EVs were recovered through differential centrifugations by centrifuging supernatants at 500 × g for 10 min, and then at 10,000 × g for 30 min. Supernatants were harvested, filtered with 0.22 μm pore size filters, and ultracentrifuged at 70,000 × g for l h. Pelleted vesicles were resuspended in 1×PBS, and ultracentrifuged again at 70,000 × g for 1 h. Afterward, pellets containing EVs were resuspended in 1:100 of the initial volume.
Western blot analyses of both cell lysates and EVs were carried out as reported11, and filters were revealed using 1:2000 diluted anti-flag M2 mAb from Merck (cat. H1029), 1:500-diluted anti-β-actin mAb (cat. 122625, Cell Signaling), 1:500 diluted anti-Alix Abs (PA5-52873 Invitrogen). Filters were analyzed by a Chemi-Doc apparatus (Bio-Rad) and relevant signals quantified by Image Lab software version 6.1.
Virus production
VERO-E6 cells were grown in DMEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher) supplemented with 2% FCS, 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and non-essential amino acids (Gibco). The ancestral SARS-CoV-2/Italy INMI1#52284 viral isolate was propagated by inoculation of 70% confluent VERO-E6 cells51. Infected cell culture supernatant was harvested at 72 h post infection, clarified, aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C.
Mouse infection
Before experimental infection, mice were anesthetized with a combination of ketamine (50 mg/kg of body weight) and medetomidine (1 mg/kg of body weight) administered intraperitoneally. A volume of 30 μL of each dilution was administered intranasally (i.n.), at 15 μL per nostril, dropwise. After virus challenge, intraperitoneal injection of atipamezole (1 mg/kg of body weight) was used as a reversal agent. For in vivo titration of the SARS-CoV-2/Italy INMI1#52284 isolate, age-matched K18-hACE2 mice were randomized by body weight into groups of 4, and challenged with 5-fold serial dilutions in 1×PBS of the virus preparation containing 2.2 × 105, 4.4 × 104, 8.8 × 103, and 1.8 × 103 TCID50 measured as previously reported51. As a negative control, 4 mice were sedated and an equal volume of 1×PBS was administered. Animals were assessed daily for clinical signs of infection. Virus challenge in immunized mice was performed using a virus dose of 4.4 lethal doses at 50% (LD50) resulting in a 99.99% predicted probability of mortality in untreated mice.
Extraction and purification of lung RNA
Lungs were stored frozen after excision. After thawing, equal amounts of tissues were minced and incubated for 10 min in 1 mL of TRIzol™ Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Minced tissue was then passed through a QIAshredder homogenizer (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), and the flow-through was used for chloroform extraction according to the TRIzol™ protocol, using 0.2 mL of chloroform. Recovered total RNA was stored in water at −80 °C.
RT-qPCR
RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) gene was performed using a One-Step Taqman-based strategy. Mouse β-actin amplification was included as loading control. All probes and primers (Table 1) were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT). Each 20 µL reaction mixture contained 12 μL of qPCRBIO Probe 1-Step Virus Detect Lo ROX master mix (PCR Biosystems Ltd. London, UK), 3 µL of primers/probes mix, and of 1 µg of ezDNAse (Thermo Fisher)-treated RNA in a total of 5 µL. All samples were tested in duplicate, and samples with nuclease-free water alone were included as negative controls. Serial 10-fold dilutions of N1/N2 plasmid (10006625, 2019-nCoV_N_Positive Control from CDC, IDT, Belgium) were used to generate standard curves ranging from 1 to 100,000 copies. Median standard curve slope ranged from 3.25 to 3.43 with R2 > 0.998.
Table 1.
Gene name | Primer/Probe name | Sequence (5′–3′) |
---|---|---|
SARS-CoV-2 N | 2019-nCoV_N2-P | FAM/ACAATTTGCCCCCAGCGCTTCAG/BHQ1 |
2019-nCoV_N2-F | TTACAAACATTGGCCGCAAA | |
2019-nCoV_N2-R | GCGCGACATTCCGAAGAA | |
β-actin | β-actin_P | FAM/ATTCCATAC/ZEN/CCAAGAAGGAAGGCTGG/3IABkFQ |
β-actin_ F | AGGTCTTTACGGATGTCAACG | |
β-actin_R | ATTGGCAACGAGCGGTT |
Samples were run on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast PCR system (Thermo Fisher). The following cycling conditions were applied: reverse transcription for 10 min at 55 °C followed by denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min. Then, 50 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing/extension at 58 °C for 30 s. Amplification data were analyzed using Applied Biosystems 7500 software v2.3 (ThermoFisher). Results are reported as numbers of RNA copies for μg of total RNA.
Statistical analysis
When appropriate, data are presented as mean ± standard error (s.e.m.). For the in vivo virus titration, virus dilutions and number of deaths/group after challenge were used to calculate the LD50 (Quest Graph™ LD50 Calculator, AAT Bioquest, Inc., S. Francisco, CA, USA). When indicated, the one- or two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test, the two-tailed Student T Test with Welch Correction, or the Kruskal–Wallis Test followed by Dunn’s Multiple Comparisons Test were conducted. Correlation analyses were conducted using the Spearman Rank Correlation Test. Statistical analyses were conducted with GraphPad Prism 9 software. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by an institutional grant from Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy. Both SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, Isolate Italy-INMI1, NR-52284, and the peptide array of SARS-Related Coronavirus 2 Spike Glycoprotein, NR-52402, were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH. We thank Patrizia Cocco, Ferdinando Costa, Daniela Diamanti, Fabiola Diamanti, Daniele Macchia, Enrico Cardarelli, and Pietro Arciero Istituto Superiore di Sanità, for technical support, and Federica Magnani and Rosangela Duranti Istituto Superiore di Sanità for secretarial assistance.
Author contributions
F.M. and C.C. contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization: M.F., F.M., and C.C; methodology: M.A., M.S., A.D., A.G., P.L., K.P., and Z.M.; investigation: F.M., C.C., F.F., and M.A.; resources: M.V., A.C., and M.F.; data curation: F.M., C.C., F.F., and M.A.; writing—original draft preparation: M.F.; writing—review and editing: F.F., C.C., and F.M.; funding acquisition: M.F.
Data availability
All data produced during the present study are available upon request made to the correspondence author.
Materials availability
All requests for reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled, upon the completion of a Material Transfer Agreement, by the correspondence author.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41541-023-00686-y.
References
- 1.Walsh EE, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based Covid-19 vaccine candidates. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:2439–2450. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jackson LA, et al. An mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2—preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:1920–1931. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Acharya CB, et al. Viral load among vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic persons infected with the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022;9:ofac135. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eyre DW, et al. Effect of Covid-19 vaccination on transmission of alpha and delta variants. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022;386:744–756. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Planas D, et al. Duration of BA.5 neutralization in sera and nasal swabs from SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated individuals, with or without omicron breakthrough infection. Med. 2022;3:838–847.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Azzi L, et al. Mucosal immune response in BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine recipients. eBioMedicine. 2022;75:103788. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garziano M, et al. Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection affects neutralizing activity in saliva of vaccinees. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:820250. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.820250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tang J, et al. Respiratory mucosal immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after mRNA vaccination. Sci. Immunol. 2022;7:eadd4853. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.add4853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Allie SR, et al. The establishment of resident memory B cells in the lung requires local antigen encounter. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:97–108. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0260-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.van Niel G, D’Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:213–228. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Di Bonito P, et al. Antitumor HPV E7-specific CTL activity elicited by in vivo engineered exosomes produced through DNA inoculation. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2017;12:4579–4591. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S131309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anticoli S, et al. An exosome-based vaccine platform imparts cytotoxic T lymphocyte immunity against viral antigens. Biotechnol. J. 2018;13:1700443. doi: 10.1002/biot.201700443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Federico M. Virus-induced CD8+ T-cell immunity and its exploitation to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Vaccines. 2021;9:922. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ferrantelli F, et al. Simultaneous CD8+ T-cell immune response against SARS-Cov-2 S, M, and N induced by endogenously engineered extracellular vesicles in both spleen and lungs. Vaccines. 2021;9:240. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ferrantelli F, et al. Strong SARS-CoV-2 N-specific CD8+ T immunity induced by engineered extracellular vesicles associates with protection from lethal infection in mice. Viruses. 2022;14:329. doi: 10.3390/v14020329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McCray PB, et al. Lethal infection of K18-hACE2 mice infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 2007;81:813–821. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02012-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kumari P, et al. Neuroinvasion and encephalitis following intranasal inoculation of SARS-CoV-2 in K18-hACE2 mice. Viruses. 2021;13:132. doi: 10.3390/v13010132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Joyce, J. D. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects peripheral and central neurons of mice before viremia, facilitated by neuropilin-1. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2022.05.20.492834 (2022).
- 19.Carossino M, et al. Fatal neurodissemination and SARS-CoV-2 tropism in K18-hACE2 mice is only partially dependent on hACE2 expression. Viruses. 2022;14:535. doi: 10.3390/v14030535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seehusen F, et al. Neuroinvasion and neurotropism by SARS-CoV-2 variants in the K18-hACE2 mouse. Viruses. 2022;14:1020. doi: 10.3390/v14051020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Anderson KG, et al. Cutting edge: intravascular staining redefines lung CD8 T cell responses. J. Immunol. 2012;189:2702–2706. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ferrantelli F, et al. Long-term antitumor CD8+ T cell immunity induced by endogenously engineered extracellular vesicles. Cancers. 2021;13:2263. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xu Z, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:420–422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou Y, et al. Pathogenic T-cells and inflammatory monocytes incite inflammatory storms in severe COVID-19 patients. Natl Sci. Rev. 2020;7:998–1002. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sistigu A, et al. Strong CD8+ T cell antigenicity and immunogenicity of large foreign proteins incorporated in HIV-1 VLPs able to induce a Nef-dependent activation/maturation of dendritic cells. Vaccine. 2011;29:3465–3475. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Federico M. How do anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines protect from severe disease? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:10374. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lattanzi L, Federico M. A strategy of antigen incorporation into exosomes: comparing cross-presentation levels of antigens delivered by engineered exosomes and by lentiviral virus-like particles. Vaccine. 2012;30:7229–7237. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Takahashi Y, et al. Visualization and in vivo tracking of the exosomes of murine melanoma B16-BL6 cells in mice after intravenous injection. J. Biotechnol. 2013;165:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lai CP, et al. Dynamic biodistribution of extracellular vesicles in vivo using a multimodal imaging reporter. ACS Nano. 2014;8:483–494. doi: 10.1021/nn404945r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wiklander OPB, et al. Extracellular vesicle in vivo biodistribution is determined by cell source, route of administration and targeting. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2015;4:26316. doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.26316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gangadaran P, et al. A new bioluminescent reporter system to study the biodistribution of systematically injected tumor-derived bioluminescent extracellular vesicles in mice. Oncotarget. 2017;8:109894–109914. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fumagalli V, et al. Administration of aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 to K18-hACE2 mice uncouples respiratory infection from fatal neuroinvasion. Sci. Immunol. 2022;7:eabl9929. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abl9929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dong W, et al. The K18-human ACE2 transgenic mouse model recapitulates non-severe and severe COVID-19 in response to an infectious dose of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. J. Virol. 2022;96:e00964–21. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00964-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Natekar JP, et al. Differential pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in human ACE2-expressing mice. Viruses. 2022;14:1139. doi: 10.3390/v14061139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zheng MZM, Wakim LM. Tissue resident memory T cells in the respiratory tract. Mucosal Immunol. 2022;15:379–388. doi: 10.1038/s41385-021-00461-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.EMA/896245/2022 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Assessment report Spikevax Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005791/II/0075/G (2022).
- 37.Pardieck IN, et al. A third vaccination with a single T cell epitope confers protection in a murine model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:3966. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31721-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kundu R, et al. Cross-reactive memory T cells associate with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 contacts. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:80. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27674-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Eser, T. M. et al. Early nucleocapsid-specific T cell responses associate with control of SARS-CoV-2 in the upper airways and reduced systemic inflammation before seroconversion. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2222184/v1 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Wang Z, et al. Exosomes decorated with a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain as an inhalable COVID-19 vaccine. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022;6:791–805. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00902-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Popowski KD, et al. Inhalable dry powder mRNA vaccines based on extracellular vesicles. Matter. 2022;5:2960–2974. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang, Q. et al. An oral vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 RBD mRNA-bovine milk-derived exosomes induces a neutralizing antibody response in vivo. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.12.19.517879 (2022).
- 43.Huang W-C, Chiem K, Martinez-Sobrido L, Lovell JF. Intranasal immunization with liposome-displayed receptor-binding domain induces mucosal immunity and protection against SARS-CoV-2. Pathogens. 2022;11:1035. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11091035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Adashi EY, Gruppuso PA. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: the mucosal immunity imperative. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2022;97:1771–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhao J, et al. Airway memory CD4(+) T cells mediate protective immunity against emerging respiratory coronaviruses. Immunity. 2016;44:1379–1391. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ishii H, et al. Neutralizing-antibody-independent SARS-CoV-2 control correlated with intranasal-vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses. Cell Rep. Med. 2022;3:100520. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Manfredi F, et al. Activation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 human CTLs by extracellular vesicles engineered with the N viral protein. Vaccines. 2022;10:1060. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhi Y, et al. Identification of murine CD8 T cell epitopes in codon-optimized SARS-associated coronavirus spike protein. Virology. 2005;335:34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.01.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhao J, Zhao J, Perlman S. T Cell responses are required for protection from clinical disease and for virus clearance in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-infected mice. J. Virol. 2010;84:9318–9325. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01049-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liang X, Fu T-M, Xie H, Emini EA, Shiver JW. Development of HIV-1 Nef vaccine components: immunogenicity study of Nef mutants lacking myristoylation and dileucine motif in mice. Vaccine. 2002;20:3413–3421. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00308-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Michelini Z, et al. UltraViolet SANitizing system for sterilization of ambulances fleets and for real-time monitoring of their sterilization level. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;19:331. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data produced during the present study are available upon request made to the correspondence author.
All requests for reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled, upon the completion of a Material Transfer Agreement, by the correspondence author.