Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2023 Jun 2;3(6):e0001974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001974

A surge in respiratory syncytial virus infection-related hospitalizations associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study at pediatric emergency referral hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture

Koichi Shichijo 1,*, Shoko Fukura 1, Shunsuke Takeuchi 1, Takahiro Tayama 1, Akemi Ono 1, Yuko Ichihara 1, Kenichi Suga 1, Hiroki Sato 2, Atsumi Takechi 2, Sonomi Matsumoto 2, Shuji Fujino 2, Takako Taniguchi 2, Akiyoshi Takahashi 2, Tsutomu Watanabe 2, Shuji Kondo 1
Editor: Everton Falcão de Oliveira3
PMCID: PMC10237384  PMID: 37267243

Abstract

The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) resulted in implementation of social distancing and other public health measures to control the spread of infection and improve prevention, resulting in a decrease in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and pediatric respiratory tract infection rates. However, there was a rapid and large re-emergence of RSV infection in Japan. Notably, we were faced with a difficult situation wherein there was a shortage of hospital beds. This study aimed to examine the epidemiological patterns of RSV-related hospitalizations among children before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset at two pediatric emergency referral hospitals covering the entire Tokushima Prefecture. Data were extracted from electronic medical records of children hospitalized with RSV infection between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. All patients meeting the eligibility criteria were included in this study. The rates of study outcomes were documented annually during 2018–2021 and compared between the 2018–2020 and 2021 periods. In 2020, there was no RSV infection outbreak. Hospitalizations at the peak week in 2021 were 2.2- and 2.8-fold higher than those in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Hospitalizations in 2021 were concentrated within a short period. In addition, there was a significant increase in hospitalizations among children aged 3–5 months and those older than 24 months. The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use rate nearly doubled in 2021. A new pandemic in the future may cause an outbreak of RSV infection that can result in an intensive increase in the number of hospitalizations of pediatric patients requiring respiratory support, especially in infants aged <6 months. There is an urgent need to improve the preparedness of medical systems, particularly in terms of the number of inpatient beds and the immediate availability of HFNC.

Introduction

The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) resulted in the worldwide implementation of social distancing and other public health measures to control spread of infection and improve prevention of the disease. In Japan, the public was encouraged to adopt infection control measures, such as face mask use and hand washing, and avoid the “three Cs” (closed spaces, crowded places, and cross-contact settings) via physical distancing [1]. These measures resulted in a decrease in the rates of pediatric respiratory infections, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections [2]. RSV infections affect children aged <2 years and can cause severe disease in infants aged <6 months [3]. There were an estimated 33 million cases of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections among children aged 0–60 months worldwide in 2019, including 3.6 million hospitalizations and 26,300 deaths [4].

Following the relaxation of COVID-19 measures, a re-emergence of RSV infections was observed worldwide [58]. In contrast, even in Japan, where infection control measures continue, the number of cases has increased nationwide since March 2021, with incidence rates peaking in July [9], including in Tokushima Prefecture [10]. At our hospitals, the number of hospitalized RSV infection patients increased massively. We were faced with a difficult situation wherein there was a shortage of hospital beds and high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNCs). The major change in the epidemiological pattern of RSV infection transmission observed in 2021, compared with that in previous years, was the increase in the age at infection among children, with those aged ≥2 years being more susceptible to infection [11]. However, it has not been well investigated whether infection numbers and severity, as well as age at infection, have changed and how these changes have impacted medical care for hospitalized children.

This study aimed to compare the patterns of pediatric RSV-related hospitalizations between the period before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic at two pediatric emergency referral hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture. These two hospitals provide pediatric care for the entire Tokushima Prefecture; therefore, the presented findings on RSV hospitalizations can be considered to provide an overall representation of the region.

Materials and methods

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Approval was granted by the Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital Ethics Committee (approval number 21–37) and Tokushima Red Cross Hospital Ethics Committee (approval number 399). The requirement for informed consent was waived because the study was a retrospective study.

Study design and patients

We conducted a retrospective observational study of all pediatric patients admitted to the two referral hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture; data were extracted from nominal identification of electronic medical records of children hospitalized with RSV infection before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Children who were admitted to the Department of Pediatrics at Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital (public funding) and the Department of Pediatrics at Tokushima Red Cross Hospital (public funding), in Tokushima Prefecture, Japan, between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, and who met the following eligibility criteria (1 or 2) were included in this study: entry in the electronic medical record as any of the following–“RSV infection,” “RSV bronchiolitis,” “RSV pneumonia,” and “RSV encephalopathy”; and treated on site during the study period, as evidenced by medical records.

  1. positive results on a rapid antigen test

  2. clinical diagnosis of RSV infection by a physician, with an outbreak of RSV infection in the surroundings (including negative results on a rapid antigen test or without the test)

Cases without an outbreak of RSV infection in the surroundings and negative results on a rapid antigen test were excluded.

Data source and collection

Tokushima Prefecture is located in the eastern part of Shikoku island, measuring 107.37 km from east to west and 79.03 km from north to south. It is connected to Honshu island by a bridge, accessible within a day trip from Osaka city [12]. In October 2020, the general population in Tokushima Prefecture was 719,559 and the number of children aged under five years was 22,651 [13]. The study period overlapped with the change in pediatric emergency medical care system schedules of the hospitals. Both participating hospitals had a 24-hour operating pediatric care system that accepted secondary and tertiary emergency patients after hours from 17:00 to 8:30 the following day, as well as primary emergency patients from 22:30 to 8:30 the following day. However, in November 2019, owing to a shortage of pediatricians, the two hospitals introduced a rotating system for providing out-of-hours pediatric emergency care. In July 2020, the Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital resumed the previous 24-hour emergency care system. During the period of the present analysis (2018–2021), only these two hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture provided out-of-hours emergency care and pediatric emergency hospitalization. In the study, there was no reallocation of pediatric care to the reference hospitals during this period. Therefore, the data obtained from the participating hospitals represent all RSV infection cases recorded during the study period in this area.

Data on the following variables were extracted and reviewed as far back as possible from the non-nominal identification databases of the participating hospitals: number of children hospitalized for RSV infection per week; patient characteristics, including age (months), sex, palivizumab indication (at the season), palivizumab prophylaxis (at the season), presence of siblings; hospitalization duration (days), oxygen use rate (%, [number of children on oxygen/number of hospitalized children] × 100); HFNC use rate ([HFNC children/admitted children] × 100); ventilator use rate (%, [number of ventilator-controlled children/number of hospitalized children] × 100); and mortality rate ([number of deaths/number of hospitalized children] × 100).

Palivizumab indications included: infants aged ≤12 months with a gestational age at birth of ≤28 weeks; infants aged ≤6 months with a gestational age at birth of 29–35 weeks; infants aged ≤24 months who had been treated for bronchopulmonary dysplasia within the previous 6 months; infants aged ≤24 months with congenital heart disease, immunodeficiency, and/or Down syndrome.

Data analysis

The rates of study outcomes were considered annually during 2018–2021 and were compared between 2018–2020 and 2021. If there was an increase in hospitalization frequency in any age group, we conducted age-stratified analyses. All statistical analyses were performed with EZR (Version 1.40, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) [14], which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). More precisely, it is a modified version of R commander designed to add statistical functions frequently used in biostatistics. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare age differences. The Welch t-test was used to compare hospitalization duration. The Pearson chi-square test was used for all other comparisons. P-values <0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

In this study, 834 cases were analyzed. Out of the total 834 cases, positive results on a rapid antigen test comprised 820 (98.3%), and clinical diagnosis of RSV infection by a physician comprised 14 (1.7%). There was no difference in the guidelines for rapid diagnostic testing and clinical diagnosis of RSV infection between the periods. We did not perform the rapid molecular diagnostic test or virus isolation for RSV infections. The maximum age of children was 172 months. Among the 834 cases, 813 (97.5%) were residents of Tokushima Prefecture, whereas 21 (2.5%) were non-residents. In 2018, the number of children hospitalized with RSV infection peaked at week 35 (27 August to 2 September), with 23 new hospitalizations/week (Fig 1). In 2019, the peak was at week 38 (16–22 September), with 18 new hospitalizations/week. In 2020, there were no infection peaks. In 2021, no hospitalizations were recorded before week 18; however, the number of hospitalizations peaked at week 30 (26 July to 1 August), with a rate of 50 hospitalizations/week; this represented 2.2- and 2.8-fold increases relative to values recorded in 2018 and 2019, respectively. To assess the degree of hospitalization during the epidemic, we examined the percentages of annual hospitalizations in the 3 weeks before and after the epidemic peak, which were 40.0% (107/267) in 2018, 29.8% (85/285) in 2019, and 86.3% (227/263) in 2021, indicating that significantly more hospitalizations were confined to a shorter period of time (both P<0.001).

Fig 1. Number of children hospitalized due to RSV infection per week.

Fig 1

RSV infections occurred throughout the year, with a peak arising before the COVID-19 pandemic. After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, RSV infection was not observed outside the peak season. COVID-19, coronavirus disease; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.

The annual number of hospitalizations was higher in 2018 (n = 267) and 2019 (n = 285) than in 2020 (n = 19) and comparable with that in 2021 (n = 263) (Table 1). Among children hospitalized for RSV infection, the proportion of those aged <6 months and ≥24 months increased in 2021 compared to that during 2018–2020. Specifically, there was a significant increase in the percentage of hospitalizations among children aged 3–5 months (11.6 vs. 16.7%; P<0.05) and among those aged ≥24 months (14.9 vs. 24.7%; P<0.001) in 2021. In contrast, the percentage of hospitalizations among children aged 12–23 months decreased in 2021 compared to 2018–2020 (31.7 vs. 19.0%; P<0.001). There was no significant change in palivizumab indication (2.6 vs. 2.3%). Prophylaxis rates among palivizumab-eligible children were 70% (7/10) in 2018, 60% (3/5) in 2019, and 66% (2/3, excluding three cases with an unknown status) in 2021. Among children who had siblings at home, a greater proportion was hospitalized in 2021 than in 2018–2020 (56.9 vs. 71.1%; P<0.05). The duration of hospitalization did not change (5.42 vs. 5.52 days). Oxygen use rates increased slightly (41.2 vs. 46.4%) and HFNC use rates increased significantly (7.7 vs. 13.7%; P<0.01). Ventilator use rates were low in 2018–2020 (0.5%) and 2021 (1.1%). Only one RSV-related death was recorded in 2021, which was due to cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival.

Table 1. Annual changes in characteristics of children hospitalized with an RSV infection.

2018 (n = 267) 2019 (n = 285) 2020 (n = 19) 2021 (n = 263) P-value
Age: months, n (%)
    <3 months 77 (28.8) 70 (24.6) 3 (15.8) 73 (27.8) 0.674
    3–5 months 30 (11.2) 33 (11.6) 3 (15.8) 44 (16.7) 0.0472
    6–11 months 39 (14.6) 45 (15.8) 5 (26.3) 31 (11.8) 0.168
    12–23 months 87 (32.6) 89 (31.2) 5 (26.3) 50 (19.0) 0.000123
    ≥24 months 34 (12.7) 48 (16.8) 3 (15.8) 65 (24.7) 0.000919
Sex: male, n (%) 153 (57.3) 153 (53.7) 10 (52.6) 142 (54.0) 0.765
Palivizumab indication
    n (%) 8(3.0) 4 (1.4) 0 (0) 2 (0.8) 0.246
    not indicated 259 (97.0) 281 (98.6) 19 (100.0) 261 (99.2)
Palivizumab prophylaxis
    n (%) 5 (1.9) 2 (0.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.105
    not administered 262 (98.1) 283 (99.3) 19 (100.0) 263 (100.0)
Presence of siblings
    n (%) 151 (56.6) 164 (57.5) 10 (52.6) 187 (71.1) 0.0154
    no siblings 45 (16.9) 44 (15.4) 4 (21.1) 31 (11.8)
    unknown 71 (26.6) 77 (27.0) 5 (26.3) 45 (17.1)
Hospitalization duration
    mean days (SD) 5.31 (1.97) 5.50 (2.17) 5.58 (1.61) 5.52 (2.50) 0.535
Oxygen use rate, n (%) 107 (40.1) 122 (42.8) 6 (31.6) 122 (46.4) 0.175
HFNC use rate, n (%) 17 (6.4) 25 (8.8) 2 (10.5) 36 (13.7) 0.00784
Ventilator use rate, n (%) 2 (0.7) 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 3 (1.1) 0.386
Mortality rate, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.4) NA

HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SD, standard deviation

Increases in hospitalizations among children aged <6 months and ≥24 months were examined separately. Among infants aged <6 months, there was a significant increase in hospitalizations among those who had siblings at home in 2021 (74.1% vs. 94.0%; P<0.01) (Table 2). The use of HFNC also increased significantly in 2021 (16.7% vs. 26.5%; P<0.05). Among children aged ≥24 months, there were no significant differences in either the presence of siblings or HFNC use in 2021 (Table 3).

Table 2. Epidemiological changes in characteristics of infants aged <6 months.

2018–2020 (n = 216) 2021 (n = 117) P-value
Sex: male, n (%) 117 (54.2) 59 (50.4) 0.566
Palivizumab indication, n (%) 8 (3.7) 1 (0.9) 0.168
    not indicated 208 (96.3) 116 (99.1)
Palivizumab prophylaxis, n (%) 6 (2.8) 0 (0) 0.0944
    not administered 210 (97.2) 117 (100.0)
Presence of siblings, n (%) 160 (74.1) 110 (94.0) 0.00256
    no siblings 20 (9.3) 2 (1.7)
    unknown 36 (16.7) 5 (4.3)
Hospitalization duration
    mean days (SD) 6.05 (2.38) 6.37 (2.98) 0.316
Oxygen use rate, n (%) 100 (46.3) 63 (53.8) 0.207
HFNC use rate, n (%) 36 (16.7) 31 (26.5) 0.0444
Ventilator use rate, n (%) 3 (1.4) 2 (1.7) 1
Mortality rate, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) NA

HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; SD, standard deviation

Table 3. Epidemiological changes in characteristics of children aged ≥24 months.

2018–2020 (n = 85) 2021 (n = 65) P-value
Sex: male, n (%) 40 (47.1) 39 (60.0) 0.138
Palivizumab indication, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1
    not indicated 85 (100.0) 65 (100.0)
Palivizumab prophylaxis, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1
    not administered 85 (100.0) 65 (100.0)
Presence of siblings, n (%) 39 (45.9) 29 (44.6) 0.833
    no siblings 18 (21.2) 15 (23.1)
    unknown 28 (32.9) 21 (32.3)
Hospitalization duration
    mean days (SD) 5.04 (1.71) 4.80 (1.88) 0.431
Oxygen use rate, n (%) 24 (28.2) 25 (38.5) 0.22
HFNC use rate, n (%) 3 (3.5) 3 (4.6) 1
Ventilator use rate, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) NA
Mortality rate, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) NA

HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; SD, standard deviation

Discussion

The present study highlights that a rapid and large increase in the number of hospitalizations within a short period resulted in a shortage of hospital beds. As a temporary measure, we managed to increase the number of pediatric beds from 20 to 30 at the Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital. However, we could not admit children who needed hospitalization, even if they were only a few months old. We had to follow them up carefully and frequently as outpatients every day.

In addition, there was an increase in hospitalizations of children aged <6 months. Most RSV-related deaths worldwide occur in children aged 0–6 months [4]. Due to the hospital bed shortage, vulnerable infants aged <6 months were given priority hospitalization. Additional HFNC therapies were selected for them because HFNC is useful in mild to moderate cases of bronchiolitis that do not improve with oxygen therapy [15]. However, such therapies could not be provided to all children who required it, as both hospitals faced a shortage of HFNCs. This emphasizes the need to prepare a sufficient reserve supply of HFNCs for pandemic events.

We also found an increase in hospitalizations of children older than 24 months in 2021, the details of which are shown in Table 3. The data reflect the increase in the number of children who were susceptible to RSV infection. The need for oxygen use in these children increased by only 10%. This means that the RSV severity in children aged ≥24 months was not so high. The percentage of children aged ≥24 months who had siblings at home did not differ between 2018–2020 and 2021, whereas the corresponding percentage in infants aged <6 months was higher in 2021. This might explain one of the reasons for younger infants to get infected at home by older siblings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In Finland, the re-emergence of RSV infections has been associated with the lifting of COVID-19-related restrictions [7]. Therein, a resurgence of influenza has occurred; however, an influenza outbreak has not been observed in Japan yet [16], suggesting that the epidemiology of infectious diseases after the onset of COVID-19 is different in both countries. The number of COVID-19 cases in Japan was 230,304 (3,414 deaths) on December 31, 2020, increasing to 1,733,325 (18,393 deaths) in 2021 [1719]. In Tokushima Prefecture, there were 199 cases of COVID-19 in 2020, increasing to a cumulative number of 3,291 cases by the end of 2021 [20], suggesting the outbreak continued beyond 2021. In Japan, in 2021, COVID-19 was centered on socially active adults aged 20–59 years, with few infections among those aged ≤19 years [21]. People with older relatives or young children in their families were more likely to fear the severity of the disease. To date, the Japanese government continues to recommend public health infection control measures, including avoiding crowded places [21]. Although public health measures in Japan remained relatively strict, young children were generally exempt from wearing masks, making them susceptible to RSV infection, which may be acquired at daycare centers and elsewhere. Although age-based infection patterns changed in Japan in 2021, they did not change in Israel [6]. While Japan and Australia observed peak RSV infection outbreaks [8, 22], France did not [5]. Overall, these differences in RSV infection patterns may have been affected by differences in public health measures introduced to control COVID-19 spread, as well as local lifestyles.

The earlier-than-usual outbreak of RSV infections may be because palivizumab was not administered in time. Palivizumab helps to prevent severe disease and complications associated with RSV infection in high-risk children, and hence, its administration to eligible children is strongly recommended [23]. In 2021, there was no significant change in both palivizumab indication and palivizumab prophylaxis among hospitalized children. The Tokushima Pediatric Association alerted local medical institutions regarding the transmission of RSV and provided information based on the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases in Japan. This may have suppressed RSV infection in high-risk children by facilitating the earlier initiation of palivizumab programs and timely inoculation.

This study had some limitations. Although clinical diagnoses accounted for a minority of cases (1.7% of the total), there is a possibility of incorrect classification due to potential overlap with other respiratory infections and co-infections, as rapid molecular diagnostic test or viral isolation was not performed. Decisions regarding hospitalizations were at the physicians’ discretion and depended on inpatient bed availability and family circumstances. In addition, selection of therapies such as HFNC was not only decided at conferences by several doctors, but also by the doctor-in-charge. While this study only presented epidemiological data on RSV infections for a specific region of Japan, the findings may help develop preparedness strategies for future outbreaks.

The number of RSV infection-related hospitalizations increased in children aged <6 months and in those older than 24 months at two pediatric emergency referral hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture between 2018–2020 and 2021. In 2021, the RSV infection rate peaks were observed 1–2 months earlier than those in the previous years. Hospitalizations were concentrated within a short period of time. Although the current pandemic is not yet over, we need to be aware that such pandemics can cause outbreaks of RSV infection that can increase the number of hospitalizations of pediatric patients requiring pulmonary support. The preparedness of medical systems, particularly in terms of the number of inpatient beds and the immediate availability of HFNCs, needs to be improved in order to handle such emergency situations.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Raw data in this study.

(XLSX)

S1 Table. Epidemiological changes in characteristics of infants aged 6–11 months.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Epidemiological changes in characteristics of infants aged 12–23 months.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001974.r001

Decision Letter 0

Everton Falcão de Oliveira

18 Apr 2023

PGPH-D-23-00225

A surge in respiratory syncytial virus infection-related hospitalizations associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study at pediatric emergency referral hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Shichijo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 18 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Everton Falcão de Oliveira, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

2. We ask that a manuscript source file is provided at Revision. Please upload your manuscript file as a .doc, .docx, .rtf or .tex.

3. In the online submission form, you indicated that "Raw data were generated at Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital and Tokushima Red Cross Hospital. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author KS on request". All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons by return email and your exemption request will be escalated to the editor for approval. Your exemption request will be handled independently and will not hold up the peer review process, but will need to be resolved should your manuscript be accepted for publication. One of the Editorial team will then be in touch if there are any issues.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This article represents a retrospective study on respiratory syncytial virus infections in a community in Japan (Tokushima prefecture), comparing the pre-pandemic period with the period during/immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, it is an interesting study as it represents something that many medical communities have also observed: a possible increase in the number of RSV infections in a short period of time, coinciding with the relaxation of non-pharmacological measures to control COVID-19. Transforming our experiences into data that can be analyzed and bringing practical lessons that can guide public policies and strategic planning is essential.

However, some points deserve to be highlighted. The first point, which I consider crucial for decision-making regarding the publication of the work, refers to the inclusion criteria for the selected patients. On page 6, line 78, the authors state, "The following eligibility criteria were included in this study: positive results on a rapid diagnostic test or clinical diagnosis of RSV infection by a physician." I understand that many paediatricians may give a clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis, but not all these cases may be caused by RSV. The authors do not report in the results how many diagnoses were made by rapid tests and how many were made clinically. I would like the authors to clarify the criteria used for exclusive clinical diagnosis and what proportion of clinical or laboratory diagnoses were made, as I believe this could impact the results. Another question in this field is about the performance of molecular tests, which are widely used today and were not mentioned in the text. Does the Tokushima prefecture perform molecular tests for patients with bronchiolitis symptoms and negative rapid tests for RSV? Has any other important etiological agent been identified?

Continuing the text, the rest of the methodology, data collection, and statistical analyses seem adequate. The results are presented clearly. Figure 1 is appropriate and clearly emphasizes what the authors want to highlight. The tables are also clear. Only a few adjustments need to be made. On page 12, at the end of Table 1, the Ventilator use rate, n (%) was not statistically significant and is in bold, which needs to be fixed by removing the bold formatting.

Regarding the discussion, the first idea presented is the increase in the number of cases in children under six months (and the increase in the need for oxygen) and also the increase in cases in children over 24 months. The exposure is appropriate, and the evidence of increased infection in children with siblings is very interesting.

On page 16, in the second paragraph, the author presents data on the significant increase in COVID-19 infections in Tokushima comparing 2020 and 2021 and states that the government continues to recommend infection control measures but does not discuss what led to this increase. Tokushima went from 199 cases in 2020 to over 3000 in 2021, and this increase is very significant! Discussing some factors that led to this significant increase is essential to understand the increase in COVID-19 cases and those of RSV.

The data support the conclusions, and the authors present the study's limitations, which I believe are adequate. Overall, it is an interesting article that can be considered for publication, provided that the authors can clarify the raised points and add some epidemiological discussion on the factors that led to the increase in the circulation of respiratory viruses in 2021. Congratulations on the work, and I will be available to contribute if necessary and relevant.

Reviewer #2: The study “A surge in respiratory syncytial virus infection-related hospitalizations associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study at pediatric emergency referral hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture” proposes to compare the number of hospitalizations due to RSV in children with before and after design, considering the Covid-19 pandemic. Secondary data from two reference hospitals for emergency care of the pediatric population are used. It is an important proposal that, as the authors themselves describe, the result will be able to prepare health services for future local epidemics. The study may also benefit other locations, as declines in RSV cases followed increases have been documented in other nations during the Covid-19 pandemic.

I thoroughly enjoyed reviewing this manuscript and only have some minor requests for revision.

The methodology is compatible with the objective of the study. However, readers may benefit from additional information on i) location, general population and number of children under five (or older) years of age in Tokushima Prefecture; ii) type of access to the hospitals included in the study (public or private funding); iii) nominal or non-nominal identification of electronic medical records and iv) maximum age of children included in the study. Regarding the last item, I was unable to identify in the methods section up to what age the children were included in the study for the age group ≥24 months.

The hospitals included in the study are mentioned as the reference for the pediatric emergency care. Was there hospitalizations for non-resident children in Tokushima Prefecture at the reference hospitals during the study time? Was there reallocation of pediatric care to the reference hospitals in the study during the periods before and after the Covid-19 pandemic?

Did the electronic medical records allow for long-term follow-up of children (medical history)? Or, were the data about the variables obtaining only at the time of hospitalization for RSV? My question is fundamented in terms of the proportion of children ≥24 months of age with an unknown status regarding having received , palivizumab prophylaxis in comparison with children <6 months of age (estatistical significance). Could there be a memory bias regarding answering this question during hospitalization? Maybe, the information about the time and the measure procedures of the variable ", palivizumab prophylaxis" could offer more support for the discussion text about the differences of proportion.

Was there difference in the guidelines for rapid diagnostic testing and clinical diagnosis of RSV between the before and after periods? Was there a possibility of incorrect classification of the clinical diagnosis for other respiratory infections? Viral isolation was a widely used method for the diagnosis of RSV infection in the reference hospitals during the period of the study?

I would like to suggest that authors include tables of epidemiological changes in the characteristics of infants aged 6 to 11 and 12 to 23 months as a supplementary file.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Gabriel Berg de Almeida

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001974.r003

Decision Letter 1

Everton Falcão de Oliveira

12 May 2023

A surge in respiratory syncytial virus infection-related hospitalizations associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study at pediatric emergency referral hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture

PGPH-D-23-00225R1

Dear Mr. Shichijo,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'A surge in respiratory syncytial virus infection-related hospitalizations associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study at pediatric emergency referral hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Everton Falcão de Oliveira, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Raw data in this study.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Table. Epidemiological changes in characteristics of infants aged 6–11 months.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Epidemiological changes in characteristics of infants aged 12–23 months.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_20230505_0410.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES