Abstract
Current evidence has associated caspase activation with the regulation of basic cellular functions without causing apoptosis. Malfunction of non‐apoptotic caspase activities may contribute to specific neurological disorders, metabolic diseases, autoimmune conditions and cancers. However, our understanding of non‐apoptotic caspase functions remains limited. Here, we show that non‐apoptotic caspase activation prevents the intracellular accumulation of the Patched receptor in autophagosomes and the subsequent Patched‐dependent induction of autophagy in Drosophila follicular stem cells. These events ultimately sustain Hedgehog signalling and the physiological properties of ovarian somatic stem cells and their progeny under moderate thermal stress. Importantly, our key findings are partially conserved in ovarian somatic cells of human origin. These observations attribute to caspases a pro‐survival role under certain cellular conditions.
Keywords: autophagy, caspases, Hedgehog signalling, non‐apoptotic, ovarian stem cells
Subject Categories: Autophagy & Cell Death, Development, Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine
Non‐apoptotic activation of caspases sustains cell proliferation and differentiation in ovarian somatic cells under moderate thermal stress by modulating autophagy and Hedgehog (Hh)‐signalling.

Introduction
Recent findings have associated the evolutionarily conserved family of enzymes known as caspases with the regulation of essential cellular functions distinct from apoptosis (Aram et al, 2017; Bell & Megeney, 2017; Baena‐Lopez, 2018). These novel non‐apoptotic caspase roles ensure tissue homeostasis while preventing the initiation and development of numerous diseases (Aram et al, 2017; Baena‐Lopez, 2018). However, our understanding of non‐apoptotic caspase functions is still very limited. During the last decade, the Drosophila ovary has played a key role in enhancing our understanding regarding the fundamental principles that regulate stem cell physiology and intercellular communication (Losick et al, 2011; Hayashi et al, 2020). Intriguingly, the somatic progenitor cells in the Drosophila ovary and their progeny can activate effector caspases at sublethal levels in response to environmental stress (Tang et al, 2015). Therefore, it is an ideal cellular system to study the interplay between caspases, signalling mechanisms and stem cell physiology.
The early development of Drosophila female gametes occurs in the germarium, a tissue composed of germline cells and supporting somatic cells (Losick et al, 2011; Fadiga & Nystul, 2019; Hayashi et al, 2020; Fig 1A). In the anterior regions of the germarium (regions 1 and 2a), the germline is supported by the escort cells (ECs; hereafter, escort cellular domain ECD; Fig 1A; Fadiga & Nystul, 2019; Hayashi et al, 2020). At the boundary between the regions 2a and 2b, a population of follicular stem cells (FSCs) gives rise to all the posteriorly located follicular cells (pre‐FCs and FCs) and a subset of proximal anterior ECs (Fig 1A; Nystul & Spradling, 2010; Fadiga & Nystul, 2019). In regions 2b and 3 (hereafter, follicular cellular domain, FCD; Fig 1A), the germline is encapsulated to form independent follicles (Reilein et al, 2017; Fadiga & Nystul, 2019). Cell identity markers of the FCD are Fasciclin III (FasIII), Castor (Cas) and Eyes absent (Eya; Fig 1A; Nystul & Spradling, 2010; Chang et al, 2013). The cellular properties of the germarium are strongly influenced by the Hedgehog signalling pathway (Zhang & Kalderon, 2001; Vied & Kalderon, 2009; Rojas‐Rios et al, 2012; Chang et al, 2013; Sahai‐Hernandez & Nystul, 2013; Huang & Kalderon, 2014; Hayashi et al, 2020). The interaction of the Hedgehog (Hh) ligand with its membrane receptor Patched (Ptc) elicits the activation of the signalling transducer Smoothened (Smo; Briscoe & Therond, 2013). Smo subsequently prevents the proteolytic processing of the transcriptional regulator Cubitus interruptus (Ci; Briscoe & Therond, 2013; Hsia et al, 2015), thus controlling the expression of Hh target genes (Briscoe & Therond, 2013). The ECs and FSCs are the main somatic cells receiving Hh in the germarium (Rojas‐Rios et al, 2012; Sahai‐Hernandez & Nystul, 2013; Hayashi et al, 2020). The proliferation and differentiation of ovarian somatic precursors strongly rely on the activation of Hh pathway (Zhang & Kalderon, 2001; Chang et al, 2013; Sahai‐Hernandez & Nystul, 2013; Huang & Kalderon, 2014; Dai et al, 2017; Singh et al, 2018). Beyond the developmental requirements, Hh‐signalling prevents the excess of autophagy induced by Ptc under stress conditions, thus ensuring the homeostasis of ovarian somatic cells (Hartman et al, 2013; Singh et al, 2018). Importantly, numerous Hh pathway functions in ovarian somatic cells are conserved in humans (Ray et al, 2011; Szkandera et al, 2013; Rosales‐Nieves & Gonzalez‐Reyes, 2014; Zeng et al, 2017).
Figure 1. Non‐apoptotic activation of initiator caspases in somatic cells of the Drosophila germarium.

- Schematic drawing of the Drosophila germarium. Somatic cells relevant to this study (escort, follicular stem and pre‐follicular) are, respectively, depicted in green, dark blue and light blue; germline cells are shown in white.
- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing caspase activation at the dissection time point (red channel) and in the recent past (green channel, arrows) within putative escort somatic cells via DBS‐S‐QF sensor; TUNEL staining indicates apoptosis (grey, arrowhead); DAPI labels the nuclei in the entire Figure. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection. Genotype: Actin DBS‐S‐QF, UAS‐mCD8‐GFP, QUAS‐tomato‐HA/+;;QUAS‐Gal4/+ (BL83123).
- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing escort and follicular somatic cells permanently labelled with DBS‐S‐QF sensor (green channel, arrows); the arrowhead indicates the presence of germline cells positive for TUNEL staining (red, arrowhead). Notice the lack of TUNEL signal and therefore apoptosis in somatic cells permanently labelled with DBS‐S‐QF sensor (green). Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection. Genotype: Actin DBS‐S‐QF, UAS‐mCD8‐GFP, QUAS‐tomato‐HA/+; QUAS‐flippase (BL30126)/+; Actin5C FRT‐stop‐FRT lacZ‐nls/+ (BL6355).
- Graph showing the percentage of germaria permanently labelled with DBS‐S‐QF overtime at 25°C (N = 4 biological replicates; n = 520 and n = 536 germaria were inspected at 7 and 14 days post adult eclosion, respectively) and 29°C (N = 7, n = 799 at 7 days and n = 588 at 14 days). A two‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests were used to determine statistical significance (n.s. = not significant; ****P < 0.0001). Genotype: Actin DBS‐S‐QF, UAS‐mCD8‐GFP, QUAS‐tomato‐HA/+; QUAS‐flippase (BL30126)/+; Actin5C FRT‐stop‐FRT lacZ‐nls/+ (BL6355).
- Percentage of germaria showing permanently labelled with DBS‐S‐QF the ECD over time at 25 and 29°C. FasIII immunostaining was used to locate the DBS‐S‐QF labelling in the inspected germaria. The N and n numbers of these experiments are indicated in (D). A two‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant; ****P < 0.0001). Genotypes are shown in (D).
- Percentage of germaria showing permanently labelled with DBS‐S‐QF the ECD over time at 25 and 29°C. FasIII immunostaining was used to locate the DBS‐S‐QF labelling in the inspected germaria. The N and n numbers of these experiments are indicated in (D). A two‐way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant; ****P < 0.0001). Genotypes are shown in (D).
- Graph comparing the caspase activation levels reported by DBS‐S‐QF at the dissection time point (tomato‐HA) in different regions of the germarium with and without Dronc expression. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection. FasIII immunostaining was used to locate the DBS‐S‐QF labelling in the different regions of the germarium. N = 6 biological replicates; ptc‐Gal4 (n = 294) and ptc‐Gal4 UAS‐Dronc‐RNAi (n = 404) inspected germaria. An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to determine statistical significance (****P < 0.0001). The graph shows the mean and standard deviations. Genotypes: Actin DBS‐S‐QF, UAS‐mCD8‐GFP, QUAS‐tomato‐HA/+; ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+ and Actin DBS‐S‐QF, UAS‐mCD8‐GFP, QUAS‐tomato‐HA/+; ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐Dronc‐RNAi (a gift from Pascal Meier).
- Schematic drawing of the Drosophila germarium illustrating the somatic cells relevant consistently showing Dronc transcription (red).
- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing the activation of UAS‐Histone‐RFP (red channel, arrows) under the regulation of Dronc KO‐Gal4 after 7 days at 29°C; the follicular marker Castor is shown in green. Genotype: w;; Dronc KO‐Gal4/UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555).
- Biotinylation signal (green) generated in the germarium by a Dronc‐TurboID allele; notice the signal enrichment in the presumptive follicular stem cells (white arrows) and follicular cells; notice that germline cells express relative low levels of Dronc (asterisk). FasIII immunostaining (red) labels the somatic follicular cells. DAPI labels the nuclei (blue). Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 7 days at 29°C prior to dissection. Genotype: w;; Dronc TurboID (a gift from Masayuki Miura)/Tm3, Sb.
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm in the entire Figure. Full description of genotypes for all of the main figures can be found in Appendix Table S1. The box plots show the median, first quartile and third quartile of datasets. The whiskers illustrate the range between the maximum and minimum values of datasets.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Here, we investigate the potential caspase‐dependent regulation of cellular properties in ovarian somatic cells. Our experiments suggest that the homeostasis of somatic cells in the ovary under moderate thermal stress requires transient bursts of non‐apoptotic caspase activation. At the molecular level, non‐apoptotic caspase activation appears to prevent the accumulation of Ptc in autophagosomes and the subsequent Ptc‐dependent induction of autophagy. This ultimately sustains the level of Hh‐signalling and the physiological properties of ovarian somatic cells. These observations attribute to caspases a previously unrecognised pro‐survival role.
Results
Non‐apoptotic patterns of Dronc activation in ovarian somatic stem cells
We have previously generated DBS‐S‐QF (Drice‐based‐sensor short QF), a genetic sensor based on a cleavable but catalytically inactive form of the effector caspase Drice (Baena‐Lopez et al, 2018). Amongst other applications, this reporter provides a temporal perspective of initiator caspase activation by combining several cellular markers with variable cellular perdurance (Baena‐Lopez et al, 2018; Fig EV1A). Whereas the sensor‐dependent induction of tomato‐HA expression and GFP report on either the ongoing or recent past caspase activation, the presence of β‐gal labelling without any of the other signals are the unambiguous demonstration of past caspase activation without apoptosis (Baena‐Lopez et al, 2018; Fig EV1A). Intrigued by the previously described non‐apoptotic activation patterns of effector caspases in response to thermal (cold shock) or metabolic stress (starvation) in the Drosophila ovary (Tang et al, 2015), we used DBS‐S‐QF to investigate whether such activation was linked to initiator caspases. Interestingly, experiments conducted with our sensor under moderate thermal stress (29°C) consistently labelled putative somatic cells in the germarium (Fig 1B, full description of genotypes for all of the main figures can be found in Appendix Table S1). Furthermore, some DBS‐S‐QF positive cells did not show the fluorescent marker linked to ongoing caspase activation (tomato‐HA), yet they expressed GFP (recent past caspase activation) without showing signs of apoptosis (TUNEL labelling; Fig 1B). These observations suggested the presence of transient and non‐apoptotic bursts of caspase activation in the germarium. Supporting this hypothesis, we also noticed the presence of β‐gal immunoreactivity in large populations of seemingly proliferative and therefore healthy ECs and FCs (Fig 1C; hereafter, raw data used for the quantitative analyses in the main Figures can be found in the Source data files). Furthermore, the proportion of germaria permanently labelled with β‐gal significantly increased over time in flies kept at 29°C (Fig 1D). Co‐immunostaining with FasIII and β‐gal also revealed that the permanent labelling increase was not linked to germaria only showing β‐gal in the ECD (Fig 1E) but to germaria with combined labelling in the ECD and FCD (Figs 1F and EV1B, full description of genotypes for all of the EV figures can be found in Appendix Table S2). These results specifically correlated the increased DBS‐S‐QF labelling with the proliferative activity of FSCs.
Figure EV1. Non‐apoptotic caspase activation patterns detected in the germarium are connected to Dronc.

-
ASchematic diagram illustrating the temporal caspase activation profile obtained using Drice‐based sensor (DBS‐S‐QF). Left: schematic representation of the membrane attached mCD8‐DBS‐QF sensor. Right: different labelling systems used in combination with mCD8‐DBS‐QF to visualise the temporal patterns of initiator caspase activation. The early and ongoing view of initiator caspase activation is obtained through the expression of QUAS‐tomato‐HA. In parallel to the expression of tomato‐HA, the QF translocation into the nucleus upon caspase‐mediated cleavage can also activate the expression of the Gal4 transcription factor (QUAS‐Gal4) and the recombinase known as Flippase (QUAS‐flippase). Gal4 production can subsequently promote the transcription of a second cellular marker (UAS‐CD8‐GFP). Notice that the appearance of the GFP is temporarily delayed with respect to the tomato‐HA signal since it demands a second transcriptional step. However, the GFP signal lasts for longer than the tomato‐HA upon the caspase‐mediated release of QF ceases due to the second transcriptional amplification loop obtained with the Gal/UAS system. Permanent labelling of caspase‐activating cells (lineage tracing) can be achieved with the production of the Flippase recombinase. This enzyme facilitates the genomic excision of an FRT‐stop cassette that prevents the expression of a nuclear β‐galactosidase (β‐gal) from the lacZ gene under the control of the actin promoter. Upon cassette excision, the production of β‐gal stays forever in cells alive (permanent labelling).
-
BRepresentative 3D projections of confocal images showing the permanent labelling of different regions in the germarium (green, β‐gal) obtained with DBS‐S‐QF. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI staining (blue). FasIII immunostaining labels the somatic follicular cells (red). Genotype: Actin DBS‐S‐QF, UAS‐mCD8‐GFP, QUAS‐tomato‐HA/+; QUAS‐flippase (BL30126)/+; Actin5C FRT‐stop‐FRT lacZ‐nls/+ (BL6355).
-
CRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing the expression pattern of Dronc KO‐Gal4 at 29°C 10 days after adult eclosion from the pupae. UAS‐Histone‐RFP reports on Gal4 transcription (red and grey). DAPI stains the nuclei (blue). Notice the expression of Dronc in somatic cells of the germarium (arrows) as well as germarium the stalk and polar cells. Genotype: w;; Dronc KO‐Gal4/UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555).
-
DBiotinylation signal (green) generated in the germarium by a Dronc‐TurboID allele; notice the signal enrichment in stalk cells (white arrows) and polar cells (white arrowhead). FasIII (red) and DAPI (blue) stainings label the somatic cells and the nuclei, respectively. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 10 days at 29°C prior to dissection. Genotype: Dronc::V5::TurboID/+ (a gift from Masayuki Miura).
-
E, FExpression of Castor (red) and FasIII (grey) in mutant morphogenetic mosaics for Dronc l29 in the germarium (GFP negative cells). Notice the downregulation of Castor (red, white arrows). Genotype: yw hs‐flippase 1.22/+; FRT80 Dronc I29/FRT80 UbiGFP.
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm in the entire figure. Full description of genotypes for all of the EV Figures can be found in Appendix Table S2.
Since our sensor was designed to detect the activation of initiator caspases, we next evaluated the dependency of the DBS‐S‐QF labelling with Dronc; main initiator Drosophila caspase linked to non‐apoptotic functions and orthologue of Caspase‐2/9. The overexpression of a Dronc‐RNAi transgene, under the control of ptc‐Gal4, in all of the escort and follicular stem cells of the germarium reduced to residual levels the labelling with DBS‐S‐QF sensor (Fig 1G). Using a fly line expressing Gal4 under the physiological regulation of Dronc (Dronc KO‐Gal4 ; Arthurton et al, 2019), we correlated our previous findings with a consistent transcriptional activation of Dronc in both follicular stem cells and their progeny at 29°C (ECs and FCs; Figs 1H and I, and EV1C). Also, the so‐called polar and stalk cells in more mature follicle chambers showed robust transcriptional activation of Dronc (Figs 1I and EV1C). Furthermore, taking advantage of a biotin ligase TurboID fused to Dronc (Shinoda et al, 2019), we detected an enrichment of Dronc in follicular (Fig 1J), polar and stalk cells (Fig EV1D). Collectively, these results strongly suggested that the ovarian follicular stem cells and their progeny (escort and follicular cells) can transiently activate Dronc in a non‐apoptotic manner under moderate thermal stress (29°C).
Dronc activation sustains cell proliferation and differentiation in follicular cells
To determine the biological significance of non‐apoptotic Dronc activation in the germarium, we generated morphogenetic mosaics using the Dronc l29 null allele. Dronc l29 homozygous cells showed a downregulation of the follicular marker Castor (Chang et al, 2013; Fig EV1E and F). However, the genetic mosaics showing this phenotype normally encompassed both somatic and germline cells (Fig EV1F). This situation precluded us to extract unambiguous conclusions about the origin of the phenotype. More importantly, these large mosaics were recovered with very low frequency after applying several heat shocks (Laws & Drummond‐Barbosa, 2015; 11.4% (4/35); total number of analysed clones n = 35 in 85 germaria). Unfortunately, this experimental regime was largely incompatible with our aim to investigate the role of Dronc under moderate stress since it was previously shown to cause cell death in Drosophila tissues (Perez‐Garijo et al, 2004). To circumvent these technical limitations, we capitalised on several Dronc conditional alleles generated in the laboratory through genome engineering (Arthurton et al, 2019; Fig EV2A). These alleles enable the efficient conversion of heterozygous wild‐type cells containing an FRT‐Dronc‐FRT rescue cassette into homozygous mutant upon exposure to the Flippase recombinase (Fig EV2B; Arthurton et al, 2019). The FRT‐Dronc‐FRT rescue cassette was followed by the QF transcriptional activator in one of these alleles, thus allowing the expression of any cDNA of interest under the physiological regulation of Dronc upon cassette excision (Fig EV2B). Combining this allele with the 109‐30‐Gal4 follicular driver (Fig EV2C and D; Sahai‐Hernandez & Nystul, 2013), we efficiently eliminated Dronc expression (100% of inspected germaria, n = 14) in the prospective FCD and a subset of ECs (Fig EV2E). Interestingly, these genetic manipulations caused a characteristic set of morphological and genetic defects in the germarium (compare Fig 2A and B; compare Fig EV2E–H). Specifically, the total number of follicular cells and the total number of Castor‐positive cells in the FCD were significantly reduced (Fig 2C). Furthermore, Castor expression was downregulated since the proportion of Castor‐positive cells versus the total of FCs also diminished (Fig 2D). Equivalent results were obtained by eliminating Dronc expression in all of the ECs and FSCs with ptc‐Gal4 (Hartman et al, 2015; Figs 2C and D, and EV2I–K).
Figure EV2. Expression pattern of relevant Gal4 drivers used in the manuscript.

- Schematics depicting the conditional Dronc alleles used throughout the manuscript. (a) the Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐ApexFRT‐QF allele expresses the transcriptional activator QF under the physiological regulation of Dronc upon FRT‐rescue cassette excision; (b) the Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐ApexFRT‐suntagHA‐Cherry allele expresses a chimeric Suntag‐HA‐Cherry polypeptide upon FRT‐rescue cassette excision; (c) the Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐ApexFRT‐FL‐DroncCAEA allele can express a full‐length version of Dronc that has mutated the cysteine in the catalytic pocket C318A and the glutamic acid required for Dronc activation E352A. Diagram generated with BioRender.
- Diagram illustrating the allele conversion of Dronc heterozygous cells into homozygous mutants using the allele Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐ApexFRT‐QF. Notice the Dronc‐QF‐dependent induction of a QUAS‐CD8‐GFP transgene upon Flippase‐mediated excision of the FRT‐rescue cassette. Diagram generated with BioRender.
- Schematic depicting the lineage tracing of 109‐30‐Gal4 expressing cells (coloured in red) in the germarium at 29°C. Follicular Stem Cells (FSCs), pre‐follicular cells (Pre‐FCs) and adjacent Escort cells (ECs) are indicated.
- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing a germarium expressing UAS‐Histone‐RFP (red) under the regulation of 109‐30‐Gal4 driver during 14 days at 29°C; Castor (green) and DAPI (blue) label the follicular cells and the nuclei, respectively. Genotype: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+.
- Castor expression (red, grey and white arrows) in follicular cells without Dronc (green). Genotype 109‐30‐Gal4/QUAS‐CD8‐GFP; Dronc KO Tub‐G80ts/UAS‐flippase Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF. Dronc‐expressing cells excising the rescue cassette are labelled with GFP (green); notice the reduction in number of Castor‐expressing cells and size of the FCD (white arrows). Genotype: Dronc−/−: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/QUAS‐CD8‐GFP (BL 30002); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flipasse (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF.
- Wild‐type expression of the follicular marker Castor (red and/or grey) in a representative germarium of the following genotype: CTRL: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/QUAS‐CD8‐GFP (BL 30002); Dronc KO Tub‐G80ts (BL7019)/TM6b.
- Wild‐type expression of the follicular marker Eyes absent (Eya) (red and/or grey) in a representative germarium of the following genotype: CTRL: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/QUAS‐CD8‐GFP (BL 30002); Dronc KO Tub‐G80ts (BL7019)/TM6b.
- Eya expression (red, grey and white arrows) in follicular cells without Dronc. Notice the reduced expression of Eya (white arrows). Genotype: Dronc−/−: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/QUAS‐CD8‐GFP (BL 30002); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flipasse (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF.
- Schematic depicting the lineage tracing of ptc‐Gal4 expressing cells (coloured in red) in the germarium at 29°C.
- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing a germarium expressing UAS‐Histone‐RFP (red) under the regulation of ptc‐Gal4 driver at 29°C. FasIII (green) and DAPI (blue) label the follicular cells and the nuclei of the germarium, respectively. Genotype: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+.
- Castor expression (red, grey and white arrows) in a representative Dronc mutant germarium of the following genotype ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/QUAS‐CD8‐GFP (BL 30002); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐Flipasse (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF. Dronc‐expressing cells excising the rescue cassette are labelled with GFP (green); notice the reduction in number of Castor‐expressing cells in the FCD as well as the size (white arrows).
- Quantification of somatic cells in S‐phase labelled by EdU incorporation in control (CTRL: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+; n = 30) versus Dronc mutant germaria (Dronc−/−: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF; n = 23). Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test (****P ≤ 0.0001).
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm in the entire figure. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection. All the experimental data shown have been obtained from N ≥ 2 biological replicates. The median and quartiles are indicated in the violin plots. All the quantifications were made in germaria containing one single group of germline cells wrapped by follicular cells.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure 2. Functional characterisation of Dronc in somatic cells.

-
A, BRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing the expression of the cell identity Castor in follicular cells control with Dronc expression (A: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+) and without Dronc (B: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF). Notice the reduction in the number of Castor‐expressing cells in the FCD and the reduction in size of this region in (B). Nuclei are labelled with DAPI (blue); Castor (green) and FasIII (grey) label the follicular cells; UAS‐Histone‐RFP labels the nuclei of Gal4‐expressing cells (red).
-
CQuantification of total number of follicular cells (left) and Castor‐expressing cells (right) within the FCD (FasIII positive region) in either heterozygous or homozygous Dronc mutant conditions: Genotypes: CTRL = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+; Dronc−/− = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF.CTRL = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. Dronc−/− = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/ UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF. N = 2; the n number for each column in order of appearance n = 16, n = 14, n = 20, n = 17, n = 19, n = 18. Statistical significance was determined by using an unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test (****P ≤ 0.001). The median and quartiles are indicated in the violin plots.
-
DPercentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (C). The box plot shows the median, first quartile and third quartile of the dataset. The whiskers illustrate the range between the maximum and minimum values of the dataset. Statistical significance was established by using a nonparametric Mann–Whitney t‐test (****P ≤ 0.0001). n numbers and genotypes are shown in (C).
-
EPercentage of germaria showing TUNEL staining in different cell types of the germarium (somatic cells and germline cells) upon altering Dronc expression in all of the escort cells and follicular stem cells. N = 3 biological replicates; the n number of inspected germaria per condition is indicated close to the genotype. The genotypes in the graph are as follows: White triangle (n = 378 germaria) = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; +/+. Yellow circle (n = 381) = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. Red square (n = 196) = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐suntag‐HA. Blue circle (n = 184) = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐Dronc (BL56198); Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. An ordinary one‐way ANOVA and Holm–Sidak's multiple comparison test were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001). The graph shows the mean and standard deviations.
-
FRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing TUNEL staining (green) in a germarium ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. UAS‐Histone‐RFP expression induced by ptc‐Gal4 is shown in red. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI (blue). FasIII (grey) labels the follicular cells. Notice a group of germline cells (negative for FasIII and Histone‐RFP) positive for TUNEL (green; white arrow).
-
GRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing TUNEL staining (green) in a germarium ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KO UAS‐Histone‐RFP (BL56555) Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐Dronc (BL56198). UAS‐Histone‐RFP expression induced by ptc‐Gal4 is shown in red. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI (blue). FasIII (grey) labels the follicular cells. Notice a group of germline cells (negative for FasIII and Histone‐RFP) positive for TUNEL (green; white arrow). Overlap of TUNEL with Histone‐RFP and FasIII indicates apoptosis of a somatic cell (arrowhead).
-
HDiagram illustrating the labelling of the different stages in the cell cycle using UAS‐Fly‐Fucci.
-
IGraph quantifying the Fly‐FUCCI labelling in follicular cells with or without Dronc expression. Genotypes: CTRL (N = 2; n = 27) = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐FUCCI(BL55100); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (Dronc−/−: (N = 2; n = 24) = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐FUCCI(BL55100); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐suntagHA). FasIII staining was used as a reference to locate the follicular cells in the inspected germaria. Notice the accumulation of cells in S‐phase (red signal) at expense of other cell cycle stages. A nonparametric Mann–Whitney t‐test was used to determine statistical significance (**P ≤ 0.01; ****P ≤ 0.0001). The median and quartiles are indicated in the violin plots.
-
J, KRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images of the genotypes quantified in I. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI (blue). Red and green nuclei show the expression of different Fucci markers. FasIII (grey) was used to locate the FCD. Notice the reduction of follicular cells and limited overlap between the green and red fluorescent signals (white arrowheads) in (K).
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection (applicable to all panels).
Source data are available online for this figure.
To better determine the origin of the reduction in the number of follicular cells, we analysed the rate of apoptosis and the cell cycle profile in our mutant conditions. Predictably, low levels of Dronc in somatic cells reduced the rate of apoptosis in the germarium while its overexpression induced cell death (reduction in TUNEL staining, Fig 2E). These genetic manipulations also caused nonautonomous apoptosis in the germline (notice the TUNEL staining in groups of cells negative for somatic markers such as FasIII and Histone‐RFP; arrows; Fig 2F and G) that could indicate cell communication defects between somatic cells and the germline (Sahai‐Hernandez et al, 2012; Shi et al, 2021). These results dissociated the growth and differentiation phenotypes induced by caspase deficiency from the process of apoptosis itself since one would expect an excess of follicular cells upon inhibiting apoptosis, as opposed to a reduction.
Next, we analysed the impact of Dronc deficiency on cell proliferation by using several cell cycle markers. The Fly‐Fucci construct reports on the cell cycle progression by labelling the different stages with distinguishable fluorescent markers (Zielke et al, 2014; Fig 2H). This tool revealed that follicular cells with limited Dronc expression were accumulated in the S‐phase at the expense of other cell cycle stages (Fig 2I–K). The accumulation of cells in S‐phase was also correlated with a significant increase in EdU labelling (S‐phase marker; Fig EV2L, hereafter, raw data used for the quantitative analyses in Figs EV can be found in the Source data files). Since the excess of cells in the S‐phase in these experiments did not increase the total number of FCs but caused a reduction (Fig 2C), we concluded that Dronc deficiency slows down the transition through the S‐phase of FCs.
To discard potential unwanted effects of QF expression and validate the association of the phenotypes with Dronc, we analysed the behaviour of a different conditional Dronc allele in the follicular cells; Dronc FRT‐Dronc‐FRT‐suntag‐HA‐cherry (Arthurton et al, 2019). This allele expresses a synthetic suntag‐HA‐mCherry peptide instead of QF upon stop cassette excision (Fig EV2A). Follicular cells only expressing Droncsuntag‐HA‐Cherry showed proliferation and differentiation defects comparable to that of cells without Dronc protein (Fig 3A–C). Collectively, our data suggested that Dronc activation facilitates the proliferation and differentiation in the FCD at 29°C.
Figure 3. Enzymatic activity of Dronc and the entire caspase pathway is required to sustain the cellular properties of ovarian somatic cells.

- Quantification of total number of follicular cells in germaria with follicular stem cells expressing normal levels of Dronc (Dronc KO /+), without Dronc expression (Dronc KO /Dronc KO‐Suntag‐HA‐Cherry), and expressing a catalytically inactive form of Dronc (Dronc KO /Dronc KO‐FL‐CAEA‐Suntag‐HA‐Cherry). The genotypes are as follows: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+ (n = 13). 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT Dronc‐GFP‐Apex FRT‐Suntag‐HA‐Cherry (n = 15). 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT Dronc‐GFP‐Apex FRT‐Dronc FL‐CAEA‐Suntag‐HA‐Cherry (n = 14). A one‐way ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Quantification of total Castor‐expressing cells within the FasIII cellular domain in the genotypes shown in (A). n numbers are shown in (A). A one‐way ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Percentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (A). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Quantification of total number of follicular cells within the FasIII cellular domain in the following genotypes: 109‐30‐Gal4/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 16). 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐DriceRNAi UAS‐DecayRNAi (a gift from Pascal Meier); UAS‐DammRNAi, UAS‐Dcp1RNAi (a gift from Pascal Meier) (n = 15). 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐Dcp1RNAi (BL28909) (n = 25) 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐DriceRNAi (BL32403) (n = 16) 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐Dark‐sh; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (a gift from M. Miura) (n = 18). 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐microRNA‐RHG; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (a gift from Iswar Hariharan) (n = 10). A one‐way ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Quantification of total number of Castor‐expressing cells in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (D). n numbers are shown in (D). A one‐way ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Percentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells (FasIII+ cells) in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (A). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001).
Data information: Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection (applicable to all panels). All the experimental data shown have been obtained from N ≥ 2 biological replicates. The median and quartiles are indicated in the violin plots. The box plots show the median, first quartile and third quartile of datasets. The whiskers illustrate the range between the maximum and minimum values of datasets. All the quantifications were made in germaria containing one single group of germline cells wrapped by follicular cells.
Source data are available online for this figure.
The entire apoptotic pathway can be engaged for non‐lethal purposes in ovarian somatic cells
To assess the molecular features of Dronc required in our experimental scenario, we used an allele that can conditionally express a full‐length but enzymatically inactive form of Dronc (Dronc FRT‐Dronc‐FRT‐FLCAEA; Fig EV2A; Arthurton et al, 2019). DroncFLCAEA contains two mutations that prevent its enzymatic activity (C318A) and proteolytic activation (E352A; Chai et al, 2003; Muro et al, 2004). Follicular cells exclusively expressing DroncFLCAEA showed proliferation and differentiation defects (Fig 3A–C) that suggested an enzymatic requirement of Dronc in our experimental scenario. Next, we evaluated whether the implementation of Dronc functions could be mediated by the effector caspases; main Dronc substrates during apoptosis. To that end, we co‐overexpressed in the FSCs validated RNAi constructs able to reduce their expression (Drice, DCP‐1, Decay and Damm; Leulier et al, 2006; Fig EV3A). This genetic manipulation caused proliferation and differentiation phenotypes reminiscent of Dronc deficiency (Fig 3D–F). Since effector caspases can be functionally redundant (Xu et al, 2006), we separately assessed the contribution of DCP‐1 and Drice to these phenotypes. Although these experiments also caused proliferation defects, the differentiation phenotypes were weaker (Fig 3D–F; notice the proportion of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of follicular cells was reduced to a lesser extent), thus suggesting a likely implementation of Dronc functions mediated by the combinatorial activity of effector caspases. Supporting this hypothesis, the overexpression of either Diap‐1 or P35 (a viral pan‐effector caspase inhibitor (Hay et al, 1994)) also limited the proliferation and differentiation of ovarian somatic cells (Fig EV3A–C). In these experiments, we used ptc‐Gal4 to consistently reduce the activity of effector caspases in the entire ECD and the FSCs. In a different set of experiments, we evaluated the potential mechanisms of Dronc activation by ectopically expressing either a short‐hairpin RNA against Dark (Drosophila orthologue of Apaf‐1; Obata et al, 2014) or a microRNA against the main pro‐apoptotic factors (Hid, Reaper and Grim; RHG; Siegrist et al, 2010), respectively (Fig EV3A). Intriguingly, these experiments reduced the total number of follicular and Castor‐positive cells (Fig 3D and E); however, the proportion of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total was not affected (Fig 3F). These findings indicated that differentiation and proliferation phenotypes can be uncoupled. More importantly, our data provided evidence that the entire caspase pathway can be activated for non‐apoptotic purposes in somatic cells of the ovary.
Figure EV3. Caspase inhibition alters the cellular properties of ovarian somatic cells.

- Schematic depicting the caspase pathway, upstream regulators of Dronc and specific inhibitors of caspase activation such as Diap‐1 and P35.
- Quantification of total number of follicular cells (left) or Castor‐expressing cells (right) within the FasIII cellular domain in the following genotypes from left to right: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017) (N = 2; n = 15). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐Diap1 (BL63819) (N = 2; n = 15) ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐P35 (BL5072); UAS‐P35 (BL5073)/+ (N = 1; n = 6). Statistical significance was established by using Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test (***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Percentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells (FasIII+ cells) in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (B). n numbers are shown in (B). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
Data information: Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection. The violin plots show the mean and standard deviations in the entire figure. The box plot shows the median, first quartile and third quartile of the dataset. The whiskers illustrate the range between the maximum and minimum values of the dataset. All the quantifications were made in germaria containing one single group of germline cells wrapped by follicular cells.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Dronc activation can facilitate Hh‐signalling
The Hh pathway is activated in follicular stem cells and their progeny; ptc is a universal transcriptional Hh target (Briscoe & Therond, 2013) and the Ci‐155 antibody recognises the activated form of Ci (Motzny & Holmgren, 1995; Figs 4A and EV4A). This activation sustains the cell proliferation and differentiation in the FCD (Zhang & Kalderon, 2001; Chang et al, 2013; Sahai‐Hernandez & Nystul, 2013; Huang & Kalderon, 2014; Dai et al, 2017; Singh et al, 2018). Accordingly, our experiments either reducing the expression of Ci in FCs or overexpressing ptc 1130X in Hh‐expressing cells compromised the proliferation and differentiation of FCs (Fig EV4B–E). ptc 1130X encodes a form of Ptc receptor that efficiently prevents the activation of the Hh pathway in Hh‐producing cells (Johnson et al, 2000; Lu et al, 2006). Since both Hh‐signalling and caspase activation are able to sustain the cellular properties of FCs, we decided to investigate in detail their potential interplay. As indicated by ptc‐GFP expression and Ci155 immunoreactivity, the activation of the Hh pathway was downregulated in FCs without Dronc (Fig 4A–C). Importantly, comparable results were obtained upon reducing Caspase‐9 in OVCAR‐3 cells (ovarian somatic cells of human origin (Godwin et al, 1992); Fig 4D and E). To investigate how Dronc deficiency could be limiting Hh‐signalling, we overexpressed either Ci or a constitutively active form of Smo in follicular cells without Dronc. Importantly, these genetic manipulations rescued the growth and Castor expression (compare Fig 2A–C with Figs 4F–I, and EV4F and G). We then evaluated whether the Hh‐ligand was competent for signalling in FCs without Dronc. Since Hh is a diffusible extracellular ligand (Briscoe & Therond, 2013), we attempted to mainly restrict its overexpression within Hh‐expressing cells by using the ptc‐Gal4 driver. As previously reported (Chang et al, 2013), the excess of Hh caused a dramatic expansion of Castor‐positive cells and the fusion of egg chambers in otherwise wild‐type germaria (Fig EV4H). However, these phenotypes were partially rescued upon limiting Dronc expression in ECs and FSCs; notice the smaller proportion of fused egg chambers with continuous Castor expression and moderate increase in the number of stalk cells (Fig EV4I and J). These results suggested a potential intersection of Dronc with the Hh pathway upstream of Smo.
Figure 4. Dronc deficiency reduces Hh‐signalling in Drosophila and OVCAR‐3 ovarian somatic cells.

-
A, BRepresentative 2D projections of confocal images showing the expression of Ci‐155 (blue and grey channels), ptc‐GFP (green and grey); ptc‐GFP is a bona‐fide transcriptional read‐out of Hh pathway and weak hypomorph allele (Buszczak et al, 2007), and Castor (red and grey) in germaria with either normal (A) or deficient Dronc expression (B). Genotypes: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/ptc‐GFPCB02030 (a gift from Isabel Guerrero) (A) and 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/ptc‐GFPCB02030 ; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF .
-
CQuantification of ptc‐GFP expression in either control (n = 17) or Dronc mutant (n = 13) germaria shown in (A and B); an unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to establish the statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001).
-
DWestern blot showing Caspase‐9 expression (upper lane) and actin (bottom lane, loading control) in either control or Caspase‐9 deficient OVCAR‐3 cells (24 and 72 h post‐transfection of an shRNA against Caspase‐9). Notice the strong downregulation of Caspase‐9 72 h after siRNA treatment.
-
EmRNA levels of patch1 measured by Q‐PCR in either control or Caspase‐9 deficient OVCAR‐3 cells; a nonparametric Mann–Whitney t‐test was used to establish the statistical significance (**P ≤ 0.01). N = 6 biological replicates.
-
F, GRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing Castor expression (red and grey channels) in follicular cells either heterozygous (F) or homozygous (G) mutant for Dronc that express a constitutively active form of smo. DAPI staining labels the nuclei. Genotypes: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐smo Act (BL44621); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (F). 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐smo Act (BL44621); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF (G).
-
HQuantification of total number of follicular cells (left) or Castor‐expressing cells (right) within the FasIII cellular domain in the following genotypes from left to right: Dronc−/− = CTRL = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/ UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF (n = 16). CTRL = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐smo Act (BL44621); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 11). Dronc−/− = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐smoAct (BL44621); DroncKOTub‐G80ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) DroncKO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF (n = 8). CTRL = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐Ci (BL28984); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. (n = 7). Dronc−/− = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐UAS‐Ci (BL28984); DroncKOTub‐G80ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) DroncKO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF (n = 21). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
-
IPercentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells (FasIII+ cells) in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (H). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001).
-
JQuantification of total number of follicular cells (left) or Castor‐expressing cells (right) within the FasIII cellular domain in the following genotypes from left to right: Dronc+/+ = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019) (n = 19). Dronc+/− = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 23). Dronc+/− UAS‐Dronc = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐Dronc (BL56198) (n = 14). A one‐way ordinary ANOVA and Welch's correction were used to establish statistical significance (n.s., not significant; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
-
KPercentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells (FasIII+ cells) in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (J). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001).
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm in the entire figure. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection (applicable to all panels). Unless otherwise indicated, all experimental data presented were obtained from N ≥ 2 biological replicates. The median and quartiles are indicated in the violin plots. The box plots show the median, first quartile and third quartile of datasets. The whiskers illustrate the range between the maximum and minimum values of datasets. All the quantifications were made in germaria containing one single group of germline cells wrapped by follicular cells.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure EV4. Dronc deficiency limits Hh‐signalling.

-
ASchematics depicting the pattern of expression of ptc‐GFP (green, left) and Ci‐155 (blue, right) in the germarium. Notice the high levels of Ptc‐GFP in Escort cells (ECs) and Follicular Stem Cells (FSCs) and the low levels in some follicular cells. High levels of Ci‐155 are observed in follicular cells and the escort cells adjacent to the FSCs.
-
BRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing FasIII (green and/or grey), Castor (red and/or grey) and Ci‐155 (blue and/or grey) expression in a control germarium (109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+).
-
CRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing FasIII (green and/or grey), Castor (red and/or grey) and Ci‐155 (blue and/or grey) expression in a representative control germarium (109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; UAS‐Ci‐RNAi (BL28984)/+). Notice the gaps in Castor expression within the Follicular region (white arrows).
-
DQuantification of total number of follicular cells (left) or Castor‐expressing cells (right) within the FasIII cellular domain in the following genotypes from left to right: CTRL = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+ (n = 15). Dronc−/− = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; UAS‐Ci‐RNAi (BL28984)/+ (n = 21). CTRL = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 19). UAS‐ptc 1130XYFP = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐ptc 1130XYFP (BL52215); Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 8). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to determine statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
-
EPercentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells (FasIII+ cells) in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (D). n numbers are shown in (D). A nonparametric Mann–Whitney t‐tests were used to determine statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001).
-
F, GRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing Castor expression (red and/or grey) and DAPI (blue) in mutant germarium of the following genotypes: 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐Ci (BL32571); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (F). 109–30Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐Ci (BL32571); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐Flipasse (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF (G).
-
H, IRepresentative 3D projections of confocal images showing Castor expression (green), FasIII (red) and DAPI (blue) in mutant germarium of the following genotypes: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐hh‐EGFP.H (BL81024); Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (H). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐hh‐EGFP.H (BL81024); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐Flipasse (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐suntag‐HA‐Cherry (I). Whereas Castor expression is continuous and the egg chambers are normally fused in the genetic background of (H), caspase deficiency in (I) facilitates the formation of independent egg chambers and discontinuity in Castor expression (arrowheads).
-
JFrequency of ovarioles showing independent egg chambers and castor discontinuity in the genotypes shown in (H and I). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐hh‐EGFP.H (BL81024); Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. (N = 4, n = 445). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐hh‐EGFP.H (BL81024); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/UAS‐Flipasse (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐suntag‐HA‐Cherry. (N = 4, n = 335). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to determine statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001).
-
KWestern blot showing Ci‐155 expression (upper lane) and actin (bottom lane, loading control) in the genotypes indicated in the picture. Notice the downregulation of Ci‐155 72 h after siRNA treatment.
-
LRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing the expression of Ci‐155 (blue and grey channels), ptc‐GFP (green and grey) and Castor (red and grey) in ptc‐GFPCB02030 (a gift from Isabel Guerrero)/+; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ germaria. Notice the downregulation of ptc‐GFP and Ci‐155 (compare with Fig 4A).
-
MRepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing the expression of Castor (blue and grey) and DAPI (blue) in a ptc S2 (BL6332)/+; Dronc KO/+ germarium.
-
NQuantification of Castor expression within the FasIII domain in the following genotypes: ptc S2 (BL6332)/+ (N = 2; n = 23). ptc S2 (BL6332)/+; Dronc KO/+ (N = 2; n = 19). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to determine statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001).
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm in all of the confocal images of the figure. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection. The median and quartiles are indicated in the violin plots. The box plots show the median, first quartile and third quartile of datasets. The whiskers illustrate the range between the maximum and minimum values of datasets. All the quantifications were made in germaria containing one single group of germline cells wrapped by follicular cells.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Ptc is the receptor of Hh that represses the activation of Smo in an unbound state to Hh (Briscoe & Therond, 2013; Hsia et al, 2015). Strikingly, double heterozygous ptc‐Gal4:Dronc germaria (ptc‐Gal4/+; Dronc KO/+) showed differentiation defects compatible with Hh deficiency instead of a Hh gain‐of‐function (Figs 4J and K, and EV4K, and Appendix Fig S2). This phenotype was also linked to lower levels of ptc‐GFP and Ci‐155 expression (Fig EV4M); notice that ptc‐Gal4 and ptc‐GFP are both weak hypomorph transcriptional ptc alleles (Shyamala & Bhat, 2002; Buszczak et al, 2007). Furthermore, double heterozygous ptc S2:Dronc KO germaria (ptc S2/+; Dronc KO/+) also showed a reduction in the number of Castor‐expressing cells (Fig EV4N and L); ptc S2 is a null allele. The specificity of the genetic interaction between Ptc and Dronc was corroborated by overexpressing Dronc in ptc‐Gal4:Dronc KO germaria, since this genetic manipulation was sufficient to rescue the Castor expression and therefore the differentiation defects (Fig 4J and K). These results provided genetic evidence about an intriguing intersection of Dronc activation with the Hh pathway at the level of Ptc.
Dronc activation prevents Ptc accumulation in autophagosomes
The localisation of Ptc receptor in the plasma membrane is essential to limit the activation of Smo in cells not receiving Hh (Briscoe & Therond, 2013) and to promote Hh degradation upon internalisation (Hsia et al, 2015). To better understand a potential interplay between Dronc and the Hh pathway at the level of Ptc, we decided to investigate the distribution of Ptc in ptc‐Gal4:Dronc germaria. Immunostainings using anti‐Ptc antibody showed a significant increase in Ptc immunoreactivity in ptc‐Gal4:Dronc mutant germaria (Fig 5A and B). Furthermore, the cytoplasmic Ptc puncta (Fig EV5A) were significantly increased in size in the mutant condition (Fig EV5B). The excess of Ptc was also detected by western blot (Fig 5C). These results were unexpected since we previously showed a transcriptional downregulation of ptc in somatic cells without Dronc (Fig 4B). To assess whether Ptc could be intracellularly accumulated either on its way to the plasma membrane or after Hh‐mediated internalisation, we investigated the distribution of Ptc1130X, a highly stable form of Ptc in the plasma membrane with low internalisation rate (Lu et al, 2006). Our experiments showed again a striking accumulation of Ptc1130X in somatic cells without Dronc (Fig EV5C–E). These data strongly suggested that Dronc activation can post‐translationally prevent the intracellular accumulation of Ptc likely before reaching the plasma membrane.
Figure 5. Dronc deficiency facilitates the intracellular accumulation of Ptc in autophagosomes.

- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing Ptc immunostaining (grey channel) in germaria of the following genotypes: Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+.
- Relative number of Ptc‐positive puncta per germaria of the following genotypes, from left to right: DroncKO Tub‐G80ts/+ (n = 10). ptc‐Gal4/+; Tub‐G80ts/+ (n = 9). ptc‐Gal4/+; DroncKO Tub‐G80ts/+ (n = 10). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001).
- Western blot showing Ptc (upper lane) and actin (bottom lane, loading control) expression in ovaries of the genotypes shown in (A). Notice the Ptc accumulation in double heterozygous germaria (ptc‐Gal4/+; Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts /+).
- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing Ptc (green) and Atg8 immunostainings (red) in germaria of the following genotypes: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 (BL37749). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 (BL37749); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. Notice the higher colocalisation between the green and red signal in the germarium ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (arrows).
- Pearson colocalisation index between Ptc and Atg8 in germaria of the following genotypes: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 (BL37749) (n = 12). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 (BL37749); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 18). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to establish the statistical significance (**P ≤ 0.01).
- Fraction of Ptc positive that overlaps with Atg8 in germaria of the genotypes shown in (E). n number is indicated in (E). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to establish the statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001). The Y axis in the graph shows the Manders' Coefficient M1‐M2.
- Fraction of Atg8+ autophagosomes that overlaps with Ptc in germaria of the genotypes shown in (E). n number is indicated in (E). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to establish the statistical significance (**P ≤ 0.01). The Y axis in the graph shows the Manders' Coefficient M2‐M1.
- Quantification of total number of follicular cells (left) or Castor‐expressing cells (right) within the FasIII cellular domain in the following genotypes from left to right: CTRL = 109‐30‐Gal4 (BL7023)/+; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. (n = 17). Dronc−/− = 109–30Gal4 (BL7023)/+; DroncKOTub‐G80ts (BL7019)/UAS‐flippase (BL8209) DroncKO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF. (n = 16). Dronc−/− UAS‐ptc‐RNAi = 109–30Gal4 (BL7023)/UAS‐ptc‐RNAi (BL55686); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/ UAS‐flippase (BL8209) Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐GFP‐APEX‐FRT‐QF . (n = 15). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Percentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells (FasIII+ cells) in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (H). Data are expressed as box‐and‐whiskers plots, with min to max range as whiskers. A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001).
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection (applicable to all panels). All the experimental data shown have been obtained from N ≥ 2 biological replicates. The median and quartiles are indicated in the violin plots. The box plot shows the median, first quartile and third quartile of the dataset. The whiskers illustrate the range between the maximum and minimum values of the dataset. All the quantifications were made in germaria containing one single group of germline cells wrapped by follicular cells.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure EV5. Dronc deficiency facilitates the intracellular accumulation of Ptc.

-
ARepresentative 2D projection of confocal images showing the expression of Ptc (red and grey), mCD8‐GFP (green) and DAPI (blue) in a ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐mCD8‐GFP (BL108068); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ germarium. Notice the intracellular.
-
BEstimation of Ptc‐positive puncta size in germaria of the following genotypes: Dronc KO/+ (n = 10). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+ (n = 9). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 10). The statistical significance between groups was established using one‐way ANOVA Tukey's multiple comparisons test (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, *P ≤ 0.05). Notice the enlargement of Ptc‐positive puncta in a double heterozygous germaria (ptc‐Gal4/+; Dronc+/−). The mean and the standard deviation are indicated in the graph.
-
C, DExpression of the ptc 1130XYFP (green) in representative germaria of the following genotypes: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐ptc 1130XYFP (BL52215); Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019) (C) ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐ptc 1130XYFP (BL52215); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (D). Dapi (blue) and FasIII (red) stainings label the nuclei and follicular cells, respectively. Notice the preferential accumulation of GFP signal within the ECs next to the boundary of FasIII expression in (D).
-
EQuantification of ptc 1130X‐YFP expression levels in germaria of the following genotypes: CTRL = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/ UAS‐ptc 1130X YFP (BL52215); Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019) (n = 8). Dronc+/− = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐ptc 1130XYFP (BL52215); Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 16). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to determine statistical significance (****P ≤ 0.0001). Median and quartiles are shown in the violin plot.
-
FRepresentative confocal image showing the expression of Ci‐155 (blue and/or grey), ptc‐GFP (green and/or grey) and Castor (red) in germaria of the following genotype ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/ptc‐GFPCB02030; Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. Notice that the expression levels of Ci, ptc‐GFP and Castor are largely restored.
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm in all of the confocal images of the figure. All the experimental data shown have been obtained from N ≥ 2 biological replicates. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection. All the quantifications were made in germaria containing one single group of germline cells wrapped by follicular cells.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Intriguingly, recent reports have revealed a function of Ptc as a regulator of autophagy in the Drosophila ovary independent of Hh pathway (Jimenez‐Sanchez et al, 2012; Singh et al, 2018). In mammalian cells, it has also been reported the autophagy‐dependent degradation of Ptch1 (Yang et al, 2021). These findings prompted us to explore whether the Ptc aggregates observed in ptc‐Gal4:Dronc germaria could be localised in autophagosomes. To this end, we performed colocalisation experiments between Ptc and the autophagy regulator Atg8 (Slobodkin & Elazar, 2013). These experiments showed a significantly increased colocalisation between Ptc and Atg8 in ptc‐Gal4:Dronc germaria (Fig 5D and E), a higher proportion of Ptc in Atg8+ autophagosomes (Fig 5F), and more Atg8+ autophagosomes loaded with Ptc (Fig 5G). To assess the biological significance of Ptc accumulation in autophagosomes, we reduced Ptc protein levels without affecting its molecular features by overexpressing a Ptc RNAi construct in FSCs. These experiments rescued the proliferation and differentiation defects shown by FCs without Dronc (Fig 5H and I). A compatible phenotypic rescue was obtained by using a heteroallelic combination for ptc that reduced the transcription efficiency of the gene without affecting the molecular structure of the protein (Fig EV5F). Collectively, our experiments revealed a previously unrecognised ability of Dronc to prevent the accumulation of Ptc in autophagosomes. They also underscored the relevance of limiting the intracellular accumulation of Ptc to maintain the homeostasis of ovarian somatic cells.
Dronc phenotypes are strongly linked to Ptc‐induced autophagy
The reported ability of Ptc to induce autophagy (Jimenez‐Sanchez et al, 2012; Singh et al, 2018) and its prevalent accumulation in Atg8 autophagosomes in somatic cells without Dronc (Fig 5D–G) prompted us to evaluate the biological significance of autophagy in our cellular scenario. To assess the autophagy flux, we first used a dual GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 reporter (Nezis et al, 2010). Whereas early autophagosomes are labelled with GFP and mCherry, late autophagolysosomes only retain the mCherry signal (Nezis et al, 2010; Appendix Fig S1A). This is due to the degradation of GFP caused by the acidification of autophagosomes upon fusing with the lysosomes (Nezis et al, 2010). The live observation of the GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 reporter showed more abundant and larger autophagosomes in ptc‐Gal4:Dronc germaria (Fig 6A–C). Interestingly, the proportion of early autophagosomes expressing GFP and mCherry also increased (Fig 6D). We then evaluated the expression of the autophagy marker known as Ref2P; Ref2P is degraded in cells with high levels of autophagy (Bjorkoy et al, 2009) and is the Drosophila orthologue of p62 (Nezis et al, 2008). Our experiments showed an accumulation of Ref2P in ptc‐Gal4/+ germaria that was rescued by halving the dose of Dronc (ptc‐Gal4/+; Dronc KO/+; Fig 6E–G). Importantly, similar results were observed in human Caspase‐9‐deficient cells exposed to low concentrations of EtOH (Fig 6H and I); previous reports have shown that low levels of EtOH trigger moderate cellular stress and activation of autophagy (Li et al, 2014). We obtained further evidence regarding the specificity of p62 downregulation in these experiments by treating Caspase‐9 deficient cells exposed to ETOH with bafilomycin, a well‐characterised inhibitor of autophagy (Mauvezin & Neufeld, 2015). The bafilomycin treatment restored the intracellular levels of p62 (Fig 6H and I). These findings strongly connected caspase deficiency with the Ptc‐dependent induction of autophagy.
Figure 6. Dronc deficiency phenotypes are strongly linked to an excess of autophagy induced by Ptc accumulation.

- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing the overlap between GFP (green) and Cherry (red) of Atg8+ autophagosomes in germaria of the following genotypes: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 (BL37749). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/ UAS‐GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 (BL37749); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. Notice the higher colocalisation between the green and red signals in the germarium with reduced Dronc expression (arrows) as well as the higher size of Atg8+ puncta.
- Total number of Atg8+ autophagosomes in germaria of the following genotypes: ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 (BL37749) (n = 21). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 (BL37749); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+ (n = 28). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to establish the statistical significance (*P ≤ 0.05).
- Volume of Atg8+ autophagosomes in germaria of the genotypes described in (B). n number is indicated in (B). A nonparametric Mann–Whitney t‐test was used to determine statistical significance (***P < 0.001).
- Fraction of Cherry positive that overlaps with GFP in Atg8+ autophagosomes within germaria of the genotypes shown in (B). n number is indicated in (B). An unpaired parametric Welch's t‐test was used to establish the statistical significance (***P ≤ 0.001). The Y axis in the graph shows the Manders' Coefficient M1‐M2.
- Representative 2D projection of confocal images showing Ref2P immunostaining (grey channel) in germaria of the following genotypes: Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+.
- Relative number of Ref2P‐positive punctae per germaria of the following genotypes, from left to right: Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. (n = 15). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. (n = 16). ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. (n = 9). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (**P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Western blot showing Ref2P (upper lane) and actin (bottom lane, loading control) in ovaries of the genotypes shown in (A). Notice the Ref2P reduction in double heterozygous germaria (ptc‐Gal4/+; Dronc KO Tub‐G80 ts /+) compared with the (ptc‐Gal4/+; Tub‐G80 ts /+) control.
- Western blot showing the expression levels of the autophagy marker p62 (upper lane), Caspase‐9 (middle lane) and Actin (bottom lane, loading control) in either scrambled or Caspase‐9 deficient OVCAR‐3 cells; the protein levels of the different read‐outs were measured at 72 h after siRNA treatment in cells grown during the last 4 h before sample processing in our standard cell culture conditions, in cell culture media containing EtOH (0.2%), and in cell culture media containing EtOH (0.2%) + bafilomycin A1 (400 nM).
- Quantification of p62 protein levels in the experimental conditions described in (H). one sample T Wilcoxon test was used to calculate statistical significance, *P ≤ 0.05, N ≥ 3. Bars indicate value of the mean while error bars represent the standard deviation.
- Quantification of total number of follicular cells within the FasIII cellular domain in the following genotypes: ptc‐Gal4/+ = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/+; Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. (n = 19). ptc‐Gal4 /Atg8i = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐Atg8RNAi (VDRC 109654); Tub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/+. (n = 27). ptc‐Gal4/Atg8i Dronc KO/Dronc KO‐suntag‐HA‐Cherry = ptc‐Gal4 (BL2017)/UAS‐Atg8RNAi (VDRC 109654); Dronc KOTub‐G80 ts (BL7019)/Dronc KO‐FRT‐Dronc‐APEX‐GFP‐FRT‐suntag‐HA‐Cherry (n = 27). A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant, *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001).
- Quantification of the total number of Castor‐expressing cells within the FasIII cellular domain in the genotypes described in (J). n number is indicated also in (J). An ordinary one‐way ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant, **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001).
- Percentage of Castor‐expressing cells versus the total number of Follicular cells (FasIII+ cells) in germaria of the genotypes indicated in (J). Data are expressed as box‐and‐whiskers plots, with min to max range as whiskers. A Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison post‐test were used to determine statistical significance (n.s., not significant).
- Summary diagram illustrating the effects of caspase deficiency in ovarian somatic cells and their likely sequence of appearance based on our results. Diagram generated with BioRender.
Data information: Scale bars represent 10 μm. Experimental flies were kept after eclosion from the pupae for 14 days at 29°C prior to dissection (applicable to all panels). All the experimental data shown have been obtained from N ≥ 2 biological replicates. The median and quartiles are indicated in the violin plots. The box plot shows the median, first quartile and third quartile of the dataset. The whiskers illustrate the range between the maximum and minimum values of the dataset. All the quantifications were made in germaria containing one single group of germline cells wrapped by follicular cells.
Source data are available online for this figure.
To functionally assess the contribution of autophagy to Dronc phenotypes, we compromised the expression of Atg8 in FCs without Dronc. The reduction of Atg8 and therefore autophagy was sufficient to sustain the proliferation and differentiation of FCs without Dronc (Fig 6J–L; compare with Fig 2C). Consistently, Atg1 deficiency also rescued the differentiation defects observed in ptc‐Gal4/+; Dronc KO/+ germaria (Appendix Fig S1B–D; compare with Fig 4J). These findings suggested that the autophagy excess caused by caspase deficiency is key to explaining the proliferation and differentiation defects detected in ovarian somatic cells under moderate thermal stress.
Discussion
The caspases are the main drivers of apoptosis but also control numerous cellular processes without inducing cell death (Aram et al, 2017; Bell & Megeney, 2017; Baena‐Lopez, 2018). However, our knowledge regarding the regulation and biological significance of non‐apoptotic caspase functions is still limited. Here, we show that non‐apoptotic caspase activation prevents autophagy excess and sustains Hh‐signalling in ovarian somatic cells under moderate thermal stress. Importantly, these novel caspase functions are pro‐survival since they facilitate cell proliferation and differentiation of ovarian somatic precursors and their progeny.
Caspase activation can support essential cellular functions without causing apoptosis
Our experiments have shown widespread expression and transient non‐apoptotic activation of caspases in Drosophila ovarian somatic cells under moderate thermal stress (Figs 1 and EV1). Importantly, such caspase activation appears to sustain cell proliferation and differentiation (Fig 2). These findings strongly support a pro‐survival role of moderate and transient caspase activation in ovarian somatic cells while cautioning against the generic association of caspase patterns with apoptosis (Ding et al, 2016; Sun et al, 2017). Interestingly, the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation likely requires different levels of caspase activation. Supporting this hypothesis, the combined downregulation of all effector caspases causes more penetrant phenotypes than the individual deficiency of selected effector caspase members (Fig 3D–F). In parallel, our genetic manipulations have shown that the entire apoptotic pathway can be engaged for non‐apoptotic purposes (Fig 3D–F). Importantly, this is not exclusive to Drosophila since similar observations have been reported in mammalian muscle precursors (Dehkordi et al, 2020). Collectively, these results support the hypothesis that low and transient levels of caspase activation can implement pro‐survival functions while potent and sustained activation leads to apoptosis (Aram et al, 2017; Bell & Megeney, 2017; Burgon & Megeney, 2017; Baena‐Lopez, 2018).
Non‐apoptotic caspase activation prevents intracellular accumulation of Ptc and excess of autophagy
Our experiments have uncovered that caspase deficiency promotes the intracellular accumulation of Ptc receptor in autophagosomes under moderate thermal stress (Fig 5D–G); therefore, we propose that caspase activation limits the inclusion of Ptc into autophagosomes (Fig 6M). Importantly, this previously unrecognised caspase function appears to limit the Ptc‐dependent induction of autophagy (Jimenez‐Sanchez et al, 2012; Singh et al, 2018). Supporting this hypothesis, we have shown that either a reduction of Ptc protein levels (Fig 5H and I) or autophagy (Fig 6J–L) is sufficient to rescue the cell proliferation and differentiation defects caused by caspase deficiency in follicular cells (Fig 2). Although the key molecular substrate underlying these caspase functions remains elusive, our genetic experiments suggest that there must be a protein cleaved by effector caspases since either the lack of expression or activity of these caspase pathway components is sufficient to compromise the physiological properties of ovarian somatic cells (Fig 3D–F). The mutual antagonism between the apoptotic pathway and autophagy has repeatedly been described in the literature. Whereas caspase activation has been shown to cleave key autophagy components (e.g., the autophagy regulators Atg4 and Beclin are well chracterised Caspase‐3 substrates; Betin & Lane, 2009; Luo & Rubinsztein, 2010; Nikoletopoulou et al, 2013), several members of the caspase pathway are often degraded in autophagosomes to promote cell survival (Nikoletopoulou et al, 2013). Our findings now indicate that caspase activation can also limit autophagy levels by controlling the accumulation of autophagy inducers such as Ptc (Fig 6M). Importantly, the interplay between caspases and autophagy could be evolutionarily conserved in ovarian somatic cells of human origin (Fig 6H).
Non‐apoptotic caspase activation facilitates Hh‐signalling
The cell proliferation and differentiation phenotypes caused by caspase deficiency in the germarium are highly reminiscent of Hh‐signalling deprivation. Consistently, either caspase or Hh deficiency can delay the progression of the cell cycle in ovarian somatic cells (preprint: Melamed et al, 2022; Fig 2I). Furthermore, both factors are key to sustaining the expression of somatic markers such as Castor and Eyes absent (Fig 2A–D; Chang et al, 2013). These findings strongly connected the phenotypes caused by caspase deficiency with Hh‐signalling downregulation. Supporting this hypothesis, the ligand‐independent hyperactivation of the Hh pathway (overexpressing a constitutively active form of Smo or Ci) was sufficient to fully rescue the homeostasis of ovarian somatic cells without caspase activity (Figs 4F–I and 6M). Importantly, Hh‐signalling has previously been reported to inhibit autophagy in mammalian cells (Jimenez‐Sanchez et al, 2012), and the Hh‐dependent inhibition of autophagy is considered one of the main factors conferring drug resistance to transformed cells (Zeng & Ju, 2018). Taking into consideration all these factors, we suggest that the excess of autophagy is likely the primary defect caused by caspase deficiency, and this subsequently limits the efficient transduction of the Hh pathway (Fig 6M). In this scenario, it is conceivable that the excess of autophagy in ovarian somatic cells without caspase activity could promote the degradation of Hh pathway transduction components, thus limiting its signalling capacity (Fig 6M). Supporting this model, we have observed that the lack of autophagy is also sufficient to revert the proliferation and differentiation defects of FCs without caspase activation (Fig 6M). Irrespective of the ultimate molecular mechanism, the genetic evidence strongly supports that non‐apoptotic caspase activation prevents autophagy excess while facilitating Hh‐signalling in ovarian somatic cells.
Evolutionary implications of non‐apoptotic caspase activation in ovarian somatic cells
Taking into consideration the non‐apoptotic roles of ancient members of the caspase family (Lee et al, 2010; Dick & Megeney, 2013; Bell & Megeney, 2017), our findings may have evolutionary implications. Since Dronc can act as a pro‐survival factor in ovarian somatic cells, our data support the hypothesis that caspases could initially sustain basic cellular processes, and only their inadvertent/persistent activation would lead to cell death (Dick & Megeney, 2013). From this perspective, these pro‐apoptotic enzymes could act as pro‐survival factors, thus inverting the widely held view regarding their most primitive function.
Materials and Methods
Fly strains and fly husbandry details
All fly strains used are described at www.flybase.bio.indiana.edu unless otherwise indicated. After 24 h of egg laying at 25°C, experimental specimens were raised at 18°C, thus enabling the repression of Gal4 activity through a Gal80ts. This prevents lethality in our experiments during larval and pupal stages. After hatching, adults were then transferred from 18°C to 29°C until dissection time. At 29°C, the repression of Gal80ts disappears, and therefore gene expression via Gal4 is elicited within specific cell subpopulations.
Detailed genotype description
A full description of experimental genotypes and fly lines can be found in Figure legends and Appendix Tables S1 and S2.
Immunohistochemistry
Adult Drosophila ovaries were dissected in ice‐cold PBS. Immunostainings and washes were performed according to standard protocols (fixing in PBS 4% paraformaldehyde, washing in PBT 0.3% (0.3% Triton X‐100 in PBS)). Primary antibodies used in our experiments were as follows anti‐Castor (1:2,000; a gift from Alex Gould); rabbit anti‐HA (1:1,000; Cell Signaling C29F4); mouse anti‐β‐Gal (1:500; Promega Z378B); chicken Anti‐β‐Gal (1:200, Abcam AB9361); Anti‐FasIII (1:75, Hybridoma Bank 7G10); Anti‐Ci‐155‐full length (1:50, Hybridoma Bank 2A1); Anti‐Ptc (1:50, Hybridoma Bank Apa1); Anti‐Ref2P (1:300, Abcam 178440); Anti‐mCherry (1:50, invitrogen Cat #PA5‐34974). Conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) were diluted in 0.3% PBT and used in a final concentration (1:200): conjugated donkey anti‐rabbit Alexa‐Fluor‐488 (A21206) or 555 (A31572) or 647 (A31573), conjugated donkey anti‐mouse Alexa‐Fluor‐488 (A21202) or 555 (A31570) or 647 (A31571), conjugated goat anti‐rat Life Technologies (Paisley, UK) Alexa‐Fluor‐488 (A21247) or 555 (A21434). The detection of biotinylated proteins was made using Streptavidin conjugated with the 488 fluorophore (1:500; S11223). DAPI was added to the solution with the secondary antibodies for labelling the nuclei (1:1,000; Thermo Scientific 62248). Following incubation in secondary antibodies, samples were washed several times during 60 min in PBT. Finally, they were mounted on Poly‐Prep Slides (P0425‐72EA, Sigma) in Aqua‐Poly/Mount (Polysciences, Inc (18606)).
TUNEL staining
Follicles from adult Drosophila females were dissected in ice‐cold PBS and fixed in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde for 20′. After fixation, the samples were washed three times for 15′ with PBS and subsequently permeabilised with PBS containing 0.3% triton and 0.1% sodium citrate for 8′ on ice. Next we performed three washes for 20′ in PBS. The in situ detection of fragmented genomic DNA was performed according to the DeadEnd colorimetric TUNEL (Terminal transferase‐mediated dUTP nick‐end labelling) system (Promega). Briefly, samples were first equilibrated at room temperature in equilibration buffer (5–10′) and then incubated with TdT reaction mix for 1 h at 37°C in a humidified chamber to obtain the 3′‐end labelling of fragmented DNA. The reaction was terminated with three washes for 15′ in PBS. If necessary, the TUNEL protocol was followed by standard immunofluorescent staining. The detection of TUNEL‐positive cells was achieved by an incubation of 45′ with streptavidin‐fluorophore conjugated dyes.
EdU staining
Adult female ovaries were dissected in 1× PBS, transferred to a microfuge tube containing 10 mM EdU in 1× PBS, and kept at room temperature on a shaker for 1 h. Ovarioles were then dissociated, fixed and stained with primary and secondary antibodies as described above. The EdU detection reaction was performed according to the manufacturer's manual (Thermo Fisher Scientific, C10640).
Generation of morphogenetic mosaics
Two‐day‐old adult females of the genotype yw hs‐Flp 1.22/+; UAS‐flippase/+; FRT80, Dronc l29/ FRT80 Ubiquitin‐GFP were given either two or four 1‐h heat shocks at 37°C spread over 2 days (12 h apart). This allowed variable mitotic recombination efficiency and therefore different number of genetic mosaics. The higher is the number of heat shocks, the larger is the probability of covering a large fraction of tissue with mutant cells. After the last heat shock, flies were kept at 29°C under a regime of frequent transfer (every 2 days) to a fresh vial with standard food supplemented with yeast. Flies were dissected and immunostained 7 days after the last heat shock.
Imaging
Drosophila ovarioles were imaged using the Olympus Fluoview FV1200 and associated software. Z‐stacks were taken with a 40× objective at intervals along the apical‐basal axis that ensured adequate resolution along Z‐axis (step size 0.5–1.5‐μm). The same confocal settings were used during the image acquisition process of experimental and control samples. Acquired images were processed using ImageJ 1.52n, Adobe Photoshop2020 and Adobe Illustrator 2020 in order to complete the figure preparation. When confocal images were rotated, a dark rectangular background was added to create regularly shaped figures. The drawings of the manuscript corresponding to the synopsis, Figs EV2A and B, 6M, and Appendix Fig S1 were generated by Irina Stefana using the BioRender software. Biorender Figure licences can be provided upon request.
Ovaries expressing the transgene GFP‐mCherry‐Atg8 of the genotypes indicated in the figure (Fig 6A–D) were dissected and dissociated with dissection forceps over an ice‐cold slide coated with polylysine (P0425‐72EA). After the dissection was completed, two small coverslips (25/25 mm) were placed at both sides of the dissected germaria. Then, a large coverslip (25/50 mm) was placed on top of the specimens to facilitate the live imaging for no longer than 20 min under the microscope indicated above. The microscope was maintained at RT during image acquisition.
Image quantification
All of the images used in this study were randomised and blindly scored during the quantification process. Images for quantification purposes were processed with ImageJ 1.52p.
The total number of cells expressing either FasIII or UAS‐Histone‐RFP in the follicular region of the germarium was manually quantified in approximately 60 different confocal planes comprising the entire volume of the germarium using the ImageJ Cell Counter plug‐in and the following protocol. Using the Cell Counter plug‐in, we permanently label each follicular cell identified in a given focal plane with a solid dot. In subsequent focal planes, these dots appear in the same position as empty circles, thus avoiding the repeated counting of the same object. New dots can be added throughout the entire Z‐stack, in each focal plane (please see an example of the procedure in Appendix Fig S2). This procedure was followed to estimate the number of cells within the follicular region also expressing other markers (e.g., Castor). The percentage of Castor‐expressing cells in the follicular region was estimated dividing the total number of Castor‐expressing cells by the total number of FasIII/UAS‐Histone‐RFP‐positive cells in the follicular region.
To quantify the number and size of Ptc and Ref2P‐positive particles in the germarium, we first made a maximum projection of the total focal planes. Then, we sequentially applied the thresholding and “Analyse Particles” plug‐ins from ImageJ. An equivalent image processing method was used to estimate the levels of Ptc expression based on the GFP signal. The “mean grey value” function of image J was used in this instance to estimate the GFP levels.
To obtain Pearson's colocalisation and Mander's coefficients between Ptc and Atg8 as well as GFP and mCherry, we processed the confocal images with Fiji and applied the Fiji plug‐in named JACoP. Channels of interest were first separated and transformed into black‐and‐white images 8‐bit images. Then, they were merged and the area outside of the germarium was eliminated using the Fiji command “Clear outside.” Then, we opened the Fiji plug‐in JACoP and thresholded the images with the tool of this software dedicated to that function. We also limit the particle size (1 to 7) using the “Obj. function.” Finally, we clicked the Analyse button to obtain the results.
To calculate the volume of Atg8 autophagosomes, the channel showing the mCherry signal was separated and transformed into an 8‐bit black‐and‐white image in Fiji. Then, we used the “3D Objects counter” Fiji plug‐in to threshold and measure the particle volume.
Western blot
Adult Drosophila ovaries were dissected in ice‐cold PBS and snap‐frozen in liquid nitrogen. Subsequently, they were homogenised in NP40 buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 5% glycerol, 1% IGEPAL CA‐630). Cells were harvested using trypsin/EDTA and centrifuged at 300 g for 5′. Pellets were washed in PBS and then treated with RIPA lysis buffer 1× (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X‐100). Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Scientific Pierce) and Benzonase (BaseMuncher, Expedeon) were added according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein content was determined using Bradford reagent (Bio‐Rad). Extracts were mixed with NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer and separated by SDS‐PAGE. For performing the SDS‐PAGE electrophoresis, lysates were loaded and run in NuPAGE Bis‐Tris Gels in NuPAGE MOPS SDS Running Buffer (Thermofisher Scientific). Protein blot transfers were performed using Trans‐Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio‐Rad). Nitrocellulose blots were incubated at room temperature for 30′ in blocking buffer (Tris‐buffered saline with 0.1% Tween containing 5% nonfat dried milk) and then incubated overnight at 4°C in the same blocking solution with the corresponding antibodies. After washing three times for 15′ each with Tris‐buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween, the blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated (HRP) IgG, followed by washing. Immunoreactive bands were detected using the SuperSignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermofisher Scientific). Developed CL‐XPosure films (Thermofisher Scientific) were scanned using a flat‐bed scanner, and the density of the bands was measured using Gel Analyzer plug‐in in ImageJ software. Primary antibodies used: Anti‐Ptc (1:500, Hybridoma Bank Apa1); Anti‐Ref2P (1:500, Abcam 178440); Anti‐Actin (1:500, Hybridoma Bank JLA20s); Anti‐Ci‐155‐full length (1:500, Hybridoma Bank 2A1); Anti‐Caspase‐9 (C9) (1:1,000, Cell Signalling 9508); Anti‐β‐Actin−Peroxidase (1:20,000, Sigma A3854), Anti SQSTM1/P62 antibody (1:5,000, GeneTex GTX111393).
Cell culture mammalian cells
OVCAR‐3 cells were maintained in RPMI (Sigma, R8758), supplemented with 10% FBS (Life Technologies, 10500064) and grown at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. For the experiment shown in Fig 5C and D, we replaced the media with fresh media containing either EtOH (0.2%) or EtOH (0.2%) + the inhibitor of autophagy bafilomycin A1 (400 nM, Merck Chemicals). Cells were grown in these two different cell culture media during the last 4 h prior to sample processing.
RNA interference
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) specific for Caspase‐9 (ON‐TARGETplus SMART pool human L‐003309‐00‐0005, 842), PTCH1 (ON‐TARGETplus Human PTCH1, L‐003924‐00‐0005, 5727) and nontargeting controls (ON‐TARGET plus Non‐targeting Pool, D‐001810‐10‐05) were purchased from Dharmacon Inc. (UK). Cells were plated and transfected the day after with Oligofectamine™ Transfection Reagent (Thermofisher 12252) in the presence of siRNAs according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were kept in the transfection mix before processing for western blot or Q‐PCR at the specified time points (24 and 72 h).
Gene expression analyses by Q‐PCR
RNA extraction was performed using the Qiagen RNeasy Plus kit (74034). cDNAs were synthesised with Maxima First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Molecular Biology, Thermofisher, K1642) Q‐PCR were performed using QuantiNova SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, 208054). Detection was performed using Rotor‐Gene Q Real‐time PCR cycler (Qiagen).
Data were analysed using the Pfaffl method, based on ΔΔ − Ct and normalised to actin as the housekeeping gene.
Gene expression was estimated with the following primers:
Patched1:
Forward CCACGACAAAGCCGACTACAT
Reverse GCTGCAGATGGTCCTTACTTTTTC
B‐actin:
Forward CCTGGCACCCAGCACAAT
Reverse GGGCCGGACTCGTCATAC
Author contributions
Alessia Galasso: Data curation; formal analysis; supervision; validation; investigation; visualization; methodology; writing – review and editing. Derek Cui Xu: Data curation; investigation; writing – review and editing. Claire Hill: Data curation; investigation; writing – review and editing. Daria Iakovleva: Investigation; writing – review and editing. Maria Irina Stefana: Resources; data curation; writing – review and editing. Luis Alberto Baena‐Lopez: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; supervision; funding acquisition; validation; investigation; visualization; methodology; writing – original draft; project administration; writing – review and editing.
Disclosure and competing interests statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Appendix
Expanded View Figures PDF
Source Data for Expanded View and Appendix
PDF+
Source Data for Figure 1
Source Data for Figure 2
Source Data for Figure 3
Source Data for Figure 4
Source Data for Figure 5
Source Data for Figure 6
Acknowledgements
Thanks for providing flies and reagents to Isabel Guerrero (ptc‐GFP; Centro de Biología Molecular); Pascal Meier (UAS‐Dronc‐RNAi, UAS‐Drice‐RNAi, UAS‐Dcp‐RNAi, UAS‐Damm‐RNAi and UAS‐Decay‐RNAi); Iswar Hariharan (UAS‐miRGH); Alex Gould (anti‐Castor antibody, CRICK Institute), Masayuki Miura (Dronc TurboID), the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (antibodies), Addgene (pCDNA3‐connexin‐GFP‐Apex2 plasmid), Bloomington Stock Center (fly strains), Kyoto Stock Center (fly strains), Vienna Drosophila Research Center (VDRC; fly strains) and DGRC (wild‐type cDNA of dronc). Thanks to Genewiz and Bestgene for making the DNA synthesis and generating transgenic flies, respectively. Thanks also to Ulrike Gruneberg, Sonia Muliyil, Xavier Franch‐Marro, Jordan Raff and the caspaselab members (https://www.caspaselab.com) for the critical reading of the manuscript and valuable suggestions. Some diagrams in the manuscript have been created with BioRender.com. This work has been supported by Cancer Research UK C49979/A17516, the John Fell Fund from the University of Oxford (162/001), the Edward Penley Abraham Research Funds (RF290 and RF286 (19)), and the John Fell Fund from the University of Oxford 162/001. DCX was a Ph.D. student supported by the NIH NIDCR Intramural Research Program as part of the NIH‐Oxford/Cambridge Scholars Program. AG was a postdoctoral fellow of CRUK (C49979/A17516) during the execution of the project. CH was supported by funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC; BB/M011224/1).
EMBO reports (2023) 24: e51716
See also: KP Suthar & A Bergmann (June 2023)
Data availability
No primary datasets have been generated and deposited.
References
- Aram L, Yacobi‐Sharon K, Arama E (2017) CDPs: caspase‐dependent non‐lethal cellular processes. Cell Death Differ 24: 1307–1310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arthurton L, Nahotko DA, Alonso J, Baena‐Lopez LA (2019) Non‐apoptotic caspase‐dependent regulation of enteroblast quiescence in Drosophila . EMBO Rep 21: e48892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baena‐Lopez LA (2018) All about the caspase‐dependent functions without cell death. Semin Cell Dev Biol 82: 77–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baena‐Lopez LA, Arthurton L, Bischoff M, Vincent JP, Alexandre C, McGregor R (2018) Novel initiator caspase reporters uncover previously unknown features of caspase‐activating cells. Development 145: dev170811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bell RAV, Megeney LA (2017) Evolution of caspase‐mediated cell death and differentiation: twins separated at birth. Cell Death Differ 24: 1359–1368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Betin VM, Lane JD (2009) Caspase cleavage of Atg4D stimulates GABARAP‐L1 processing and triggers mitochondrial targeting and apoptosis. J Cell Sci 122: 2554–2566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bjorkoy G, Lamark T, Pankiv S, Overvatn A, Brech A, Johansen T (2009) Monitoring autophagic degradation of p62/SQSTM1. Methods Enzymol 452: 181–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Briscoe J, Therond PP (2013) The mechanisms of Hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 416–429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgon PG, Megeney LA (2017) Caspase signaling, a conserved inductive cue for metazoan cell differentiation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 82: 96–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buszczak M, Paterno S, Lighthouse D, Bachman J, Planck J, Owen S, Skora AD, Nystul TG, Ohlstein B, Allen A et al (2007) The carnegie protein trap library: a versatile tool for drosophila developmental studies. Genetics 175: 1505–1531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chai J, Yan N, Huh JR, Wu JW, Li W, Hay BA, Shi Y (2003) Molecular mechanism of reaper‐grim‐hid‐mediated suppression of DIAP1‐dependent Dronc ubiquitination. Nat Struct Biol 10: 892–898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang YC, Jang AC, Lin CH, Montell DJ (2013) Castor is required for Hedgehog‐dependent cell‐fate specification and follicle stem cell maintenance in drosophila oogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: E1734–E1742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai W, Peterson A, Kenney T, Burrous H, Montell DJ (2017) Quantitative microscopy of the Drosophila ovary shows multiple niche signals specify progenitor cell fate. Nat Commun 8: 1244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dehkordi MH, Tashakor A, O'Connell E, Fearnhead HO (2020) Apoptosome‐dependent myotube formation involves activation of caspase‐3 in differentiating myoblasts. Cell Death Dis 11: 308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dick SA, Megeney LA (2013) Cell death proteins: an evolutionary role in cellular adaptation before the advent of apoptosis. Bioessays 35: 974–983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding AX, Sun G, Argaw YG, Wong JO, Easwaran S, Montell DJ (2016) CasExpress reveals widespread and diverse patterns of cell survival of caspase‐3 activation during development in vivo. Elife 5: e10936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fadiga J, Nystul TG (2019) The follicle epithelium in the drosophila ovary is maintained by a small number of stem cells. Elife 8: e49050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godwin AK, Meister A, O'Dwyer PJ, Huang CS, Hamilton TC, Anderson ME (1992) High resistance to cisplatin in human ovarian cancer cell lines is associated with marked increase of glutathione synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 3070–3074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartman TR, Strochlic TI, Ji Y, Zinshteyn D, O'Reilly AM (2013) Diet controls drosophila follicle stem cell proliferation via Hedgehog sequestration and release. J Cell Biol 201: 741–757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartman TR, Ventresca EM, Hopkins A, Zinshteyn D, Singh T, O'Brien JA, Neubert BC, Hartman MG, Schofield HK, Stavrides KP et al (2015) Novel tools for genetic manipulation of follicle stem cells in the drosophila ovary reveal an integrin‐dependent transition from quiescence to proliferation. Genetics 199: 935–957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hay BA, Wolff T, Rubin GM (1994) Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in Drosophila . Development 120: 2121–2129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi Y, Yoshinari Y, Kobayashi S, Niwa R (2020) The regulation of drosophila ovarian stem cell niches by signaling crosstalk. Curr Opin Insect Sci 37: 23–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsia EY, Gui Y, Zheng X (2015) Regulation of Hedgehog signaling by ubiquitination. Front Biol (Beijing) 10: 203–220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang J, Kalderon D (2014) Coupling of Hedgehog and hippo pathways promotes stem cell maintenance by stimulating proliferation. J Cell Biol 205: 325–338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jimenez‐Sanchez M, Menzies FM, Chang YY, Simecek N, Neufeld TP, Rubinsztein DC (2012) The Hedgehog signalling pathway regulates autophagy. Nat Commun 3: 1200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson RL, Milenkovic L, Scott MP (2000) In vivo functions of the patched protein: requirement of the C terminus for target gene inactivation but not Hedgehog sequestration. Mol Cell 6: 467–478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laws KM, Drummond‐Barbosa D (2015) Genetic mosaic analysis of stem cell lineages in the drosophila ovary. Methods Mol Biol 1328: 57–72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee RE, Brunette S, Puente LG, Megeney LA (2010) Metacaspase Yca1 is required for clearance of insoluble protein aggregates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 13348–13353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leulier F, Ribeiro PS, Palmer E, Tenev T, Takahashi K, Robertson D, Zachariou A, Pichaud F, Ueda R, Meier P (2006) Systematic in vivo RNAi analysis of putative components of the drosophila cell death machinery. Cell Death Differ 13: 1663–1674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Wang S, Ni HM, Huang H, Ding WX (2014) Autophagy in alcohol‐induced multiorgan injury: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Biomed Res Int 2014: 498491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Losick VP, Morris LX, Fox DT, Spradling A (2011) Drosophila stem cell niches: a decade of discovery suggests a unified view of stem cell regulation. Dev Cell 21: 159–171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu X, Liu S, Kornberg TB (2006) The C‐terminal tail of the Hedgehog receptor patched regulates both localization and turnover. Genes Dev 20: 2539–2551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo S, Rubinsztein DC (2010) Apoptosis blocks Beclin 1‐dependent autophagosome synthesis: an effect rescued by Bcl‐xL. Cell Death Differ 17: 268–277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mauvezin C, Neufeld TP (2015) Bafilomycin A1 disrupts autophagic flux by inhibiting both V‐ATPase‐dependent acidification and Ca‐P60A/SERCA‐dependent autophagosome‐lysosome fusion. Autophagy 11: 1437–1438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melamed D, Choi A, Reilein A, Kalderon D (2022) Spatial regulation of drosophila ovarian follicle stem cell division rates and cell cycle transitions. bioRxiv 10.1101/2022.06.22.497017 [PREPRINT] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Motzny CK, Holmgren R (1995) The Drosophila cubitus interruptus protein and its role in the wingless and Hedgehog signal transduction pathways. Mech Dev 52: 137–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muro I, Monser K, Clem RJ (2004) Mechanism of Dronc activation in drosophila cells. J Cell Sci 117: 5035–5041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nezis IP, Simonsen A, Sagona AP, Finley K, Gaumer S, Contamine D, Rusten TE, Stenmark H, Brech A (2008) Ref(2)P, the Drosophila melanogaster homologue of mammalian p62, is required for the formation of protein aggregates in adult brain. J Cell Biol 180: 1065–1071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nezis IP, Shravage BV, Sagona AP, Lamark T, Bjorkoy G, Johansen T, Rusten TE, Brech A, Baehrecke EH, Stenmark H (2010) Autophagic degradation of dBruce controls DNA fragmentation in nurse cells during late Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. J Cell Biol 190: 523–531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nikoletopoulou V, Markaki M, Palikaras K, Tavernarakis N (2013) Crosstalk between apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833: 3448–3459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nystul T, Spradling A (2010) Regulation of epithelial stem cell replacement and follicle formation in the Drosophila ovary. Genetics 184: 503–515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Obata F, Kuranaga E, Tomioka K, Ming M, Takeishi A, Chen CH, Soga T, Miura M (2014) Necrosis‐driven systemic immune response alters SAM metabolism through the FOXO‐GNMT axis. Cell Rep 7: 821–833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez‐Garijo A, Martin FA, Morata G (2004) Caspase inhibition during apoptosis causes abnormal signalling and developmental aberrations in Drosophila . Development 131: 5591–5598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray A, Meng E, Reed E, Shevde LA, Rocconi RP (2011) Hedgehog signaling pathway regulates the growth of ovarian cancer spheroid forming cells. Int J Oncol 39: 797–804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reilein A, Melamed D, Park KS, Berg A, Cimetta E, Tandon N, Vunjak‐Novakovic G, Finkelstein S, Kalderon D (2017) Alternative direct stem cell derivatives defined by stem cell location and graded Wnt signalling. Nat Cell Biol 19: 433–444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rojas‐Rios P, Guerrero I, Gonzalez‐Reyes A (2012) Cytoneme‐mediated delivery of Hedgehog regulates the expression of bone morphogenetic proteins to maintain germline stem cells in Drosophila . PLoS Biol 10: e1001298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosales‐Nieves AE, Gonzalez‐Reyes A (2014) Genetics and mechanisms of ovarian cancer: parallels between Drosophila and humans. Semin Cell Dev Biol 28: 104–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahai‐Hernandez P, Nystul TG (2013) A dynamic population of stromal cells contributes to the follicle stem cell niche in the Drosophila ovary. Development 140: 4490–4498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahai‐Hernandez P, Castanieto A, Nystul TG (2012) Drosophila models of epithelial stem cells and their niches. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 1: 447–457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi J, Jin Z, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Yang F, Huang H, Cai T, Xi R (2021) A progressive somatic cell niche regulates germline cyst differentiation in the Drosophila ovary. Curr Biol 31: 840–852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shinoda N, Hanawa N, Chihara T, Koto A, Miura M (2019) Dronc-independent basal executioner caspase activity sustains Drosophila imaginal tissue growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116: 20539–20544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shyamala BV, Bhat KM (2002) A positive role for patched‐smoothened signaling in promoting cell proliferation during normal head development in Drosophila . Development 129: 1839–1847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siegrist SE, Haque NS, Chen CH, Hay BA, Hariharan IK (2010) Inactivation of both Foxo and reaper promotes long‐term adult neurogenesis in Drosophila . Curr Biol 20: 643–648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh T, Lee EH, Hartman TR, Ruiz‐Whalen DM, O'Reilly AM (2018) Opposing action of Hedgehog and insulin signaling balances proliferation and autophagy to determine follicle stem cell lifespan. Dev Cell 46: 720–734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slobodkin MR, Elazar Z (2013) The Atg8 family: multifunctional ubiquitin‐like key regulators of autophagy. Essays Biochem 55: 51–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun G, Guzman E, Balasanyan V, Conner CM, Wong K, Zhou HR, Kosik KS, Montell DJ (2017) A molecular signature for anastasis, recovery from the brink of apoptotic cell death. J Cell Biol 216: 3355–3368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szkandera J, Kiesslich T, Haybaeck J, Gerger A, Pichler M (2013) Hedgehog signaling pathway in ovarian cancer. Int J Mol Sci 14: 1179–1196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang HL, Tang HM, Fung MC, Hardwick JM (2015) In vivo CaspaseTracker biosensor system for detecting anastasis and non‐apoptotic caspase activity. Sci Rep 5: 9015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vied C, Kalderon D (2009) Hedgehog‐stimulated stem cells depend on non‐canonical activity of the notch co‐activator mastermind. Development 136: 2177–2186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu D, Wang Y, Willecke R, Chen Z, Ding T, Bergmann A (2006) The effector caspases drICE and dcp‐1 have partially overlapping functions in the apoptotic pathway in Drosophila . Cell Death Differ 13: 1697–1706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang X, Jin N, Wang Y, Yao Y, Wang Y, Li T, Liu C, Yu T, Yin H, Zhang Z et al (2021) Macroautophagy supports sonic Hedgehog signaling by promoting Patched1 degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1868: 119124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng X, Ju D (2018) Hedgehog signaling pathway and autophagy in cancer. Int J Mol Sci 19: 2279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng C, Chen T, Zhang Y, Chen Q (2017) Hedgehog signaling pathway regulates ovarian cancer invasion and migration via adhesion molecule CD24. J Cancer 8: 786–792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Kalderon D (2001) Hedgehog acts as a somatic stem cell factor in the Drosophila ovary. Nature 410: 599–604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zielke N, Korzelius J, van Straaten M, Bender K, Schuhknecht GFP, Dutta D, Xiang J, Edgar BA (2014) Fly‐FUCCI: a versatile tool for studying cell proliferation in complex tissues. Cell Rep 7: 588–598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
