When thinking of a healthy, well-balanced diet, most people would agree that “eating your greens” is perhaps the best approach one could follow. Dietary fibers indeed are well recognized for their ability to promote health, and recent studies have shown that a high intake of fibers significantly reduces mortality related to a number of diseases with a high incidence in Western population, including heart attack, coronary heart disease and other cardiovascular pathologies, colorectal and breast cancers, type 2 diabetes, among others.1,2 However, not only are the mechanisms behind these effects still not fully understood, but dietary fibers also is a broad term, englobing a variety of complex carbohydrates, mostly derived from plants, with distinct structural and biochemical properties. Dietary fibers can be divided into 2 major groups: insoluble fibers, whose effects rely mostly on adding bulk to the fecal mass, improving intestinal motility, and binding of noxious substances; and soluble fibers, carbohydrates that provide important bacterial metabolites after gut microbiota fermentation, thus impacting host responses both locally and systemically.3 Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin are examples of insoluble fibers, while guar gum, psyllium, inulin, pectin, and fructooligosaccharides are examples of soluble fibers. Studies on dietary fibers show large variability4 and sometimes even are contradictory, making it difficult to establish safe and accurate guidelines for fiber consumption because their effects seem to be strongly context-dependent. This might be explained by several reasons, including the different types of targeted fibers, their concentration, the duration of the dietary interventions, the direct and/or indirect correlations of the fibers with other variable elements present in the diet composition, as well as the wide variation in the gut microbial composition among animals raised in different facilities and people of different age, location, and lifestyle.5
In this issue of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bretin et al6 aimed to identify specific soluble fibers that can protect mice against experimental models of colitis without showing detrimental effects to the host. To this end, they compared the responses of animals fed with different panels of fiber-enriched diets with colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) or T-cell transfer. They observed that although the presence of inulin, cellulose, pectin, and glucomannan exacerbated the severity of DSS colitis to some extent, both psyllium and Hi-maize 260 resistant starch were able to alleviate the symptoms, yet psyllium showed the strongest protection, ameliorating colitis-related inflammation even at concentrations as low as 2%. The intake of psyllium also significantly impacted the gut microbiota by reducing the total bacterial load and the α-diversity of the bacterial community, with the loss of several members of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria and increased levels of Clostridiaceae, a unique phenotype that is contrary to those observed in animals fed with inulin. Surprisingly, the protective responses of psyllium were not mediated by interleukin 22, a cytokine largely regulated by the gut microbiome,7 and were not dependent on microbial fiber fermentation.
Next, Bretin et al6 sought to identify the host pathways involved in the protection driven by psyllium. By performing transcriptomic profiling of colonic cells, they observed that psyllium altered the gene expression of several functional categories, including genes related to bile acid secretion. Psyllium has long been recognized by its ability to bind to bile acids and prevent its reabsorption8; however, bile acid sequestration approaches failed to recapitulate the suppression of DSS colitis achieved by psyllium. Notwithstanding, psyllium-fed mice had increased levels of total bile acids in the serum, which was shown to further activate the bile acid sensor Farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a receptor that already has been reported to be involved in the alleviation of colitis severity, although the specific cell type involved in this process is still unclear.9,10 The investigators validated this correlation in their murine model by showing that the use of the FXR agonist obeticholic acid ameliorated DSS-induced inflammation, while the opposite effect was achieved by using the FXR antagonist glycol-β-muricholic acid. Moreover, psyllium-induced protection to colitis was abolished in FXR-deficient mice, but conditional depletion showed that FXR expression in epithelial cells and hepatocytes does not contribute to this phenotype. According to the investigators, they are currently generating distinct tissue-specific FXR-deficient mice aiming to identify the cell types in which FXR activation is crucial to lead to colitis protection. Altogether, these results highlight the role played by psyllium, a semisoluble, Plantago seed–derived fiber, in restoring gut health, showing that its intake modifies the gut microbiome, enhances the levels of bile acids in the serum, and activates FXR signaling, thus preventing the harmful effects of colitis without triggering other potential fiber-related deleterious phenotypes.
An interesting parallel can be made with a recent study published by Arifuzzaman et al11 showing that a high intake of inulin also strongly up-regulated the levels of bile acids in the serum of mice, an effect that was associated with increased type 2 inflammation both in the gut and lungs, and required FXR activation and the bacterial enzyme bile salt hydrolases. In addition, the effects of inulin were mimicked by the intake of cholic acid. Strikingly, despite the fact that inulin has been used by the food industry as a sugar and fat replacer in baked and dairy products given its properties of jellification and microcrystal formation,12 its beneficial effects in human beings remain poorly understood.13,14 Murine studies have claimed that inulin intake, when associated with high-fat or high-sugar diets, can ameliorate or even reverse the development of metabolic syndrome caused by these unbalanced diets.15, 16, 17, 18, 19 On the other hand, detrimental effects of inulin intake also have been reported, mainly at increased doses, leading to the exacerbation of intestinal inflammation in different models of colitis,20,21 once again highlighting the complexity and context-dependency of such dietary interventions.
Nonetheless, important questions remain when considering both recent articles6,11 together. How does psyllium contribute to increased bile acid levels in serum? Could psyllium and inulin share the same mechanisms (via bile salt hydrolases) to alter bile acid metabolism in the host, even when showing opposite modulation in the gut microbiome? How can both diets activate the same bile acid–FXR signaling pathway, and yet trigger opposite outcomes in terms of intestinal inflammation? Does the outcome depend on the cell type in which FXR is activated? If so, how is such refinement achieved? Further research along these lines will help to determine the context specificity of distinct dietary fibers. This research is highly relevant to provide a more solid ground to help improve the dietary recommendations to patients with intestinal bowel diseases because for many of them dietary fibers are not always well tolerated, and achieving the right balance between eating or not eating your greens can be a difficult challenge.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding Work on host microbiota interactions by the Laboratory of Intestinal Immunity is supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche Phagomic and the INSERM Transversal Program on Host Microbiota in Health and Disease. Also supported by an Agence Nationale de la Recherche fellowship (R.O.C.).
References
- 1.O’Keefe S.J. The association between dietary fibre deficiency and high-income lifestyle-associated diseases: Burkitt’s hypothesis revisited. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:984–996. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30257-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wilson A.S., Koller K.R., Ramaboli M.C., et al. Diet and the human gut microbiome: an international review. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65:723–740. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06112-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.DeVries J.W. On defining dietary fibre. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62:37–43. doi: 10.1079/PNS2002234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Perler B.K., Friedman E.S., Wu G.D. The role of the gut microbiota in the relationship between diet and human health. Annu Rev Physiol. 2023;85:1–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-031522-092054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Falony G., Joossens M., Vieira-Silva S., et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science. 2016;352:560–564. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bretin A., Zou J., Yeoh B.S., et al. Psyllium fiber protects against colitis via activation of bile acid sensor farnesoid X receptor. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;15:1421–1442. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2023.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kier M.E., Yi T., Lu T.L., Ghilardi N. The role of IL-22 in intestinal health and disease. J Exp Med. 2020;217 doi: 10.1084/jem.20192195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stanley M.M., Paul D., Gacke D., Murphy J. Effects of cholestyramine, Metamucil, and cellulose on fecal bile salt excretion in man. Gastroenterology. 1973;65:889–894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gadaleta R.M., van Erpecum K.J., Oldenburg B., et al. Farnesoid X receptor activation inhibits inflammation and preserves the intestinal barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2011;60:463–472. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.212159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Massafra V., Ijssennagger N., Plantinga M., et al. Splenic dendritic cell involvement in FXR-mediated amelioration of DSS colitis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arifuzzaman M., Won T.H., Li T.T., et al. Inulin fibre promotes microbiota-derived bile acids and type 2 inflammation. Nature. 2022;611:578–584. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05380-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ahmed W., Rashid S. Functional and therapeutic potential of inulin: a comprehensive review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1355775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Le Bastard Q., Chapelet G., Javaudin F., et al. The effects of inulin on gut microbial composition: a systematic review of evidence from human studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39:403–413. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03721-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hughes R.L., Alvarado D.A., Swanson K.S., Holscher H.D. The prebiotic potential of inulin-type fructans: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2021;13:492–529. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weitkunat K., Stuhlmann C., Postel A., et al. Short-chain fatty acids and inulin, but not guar gum, prevent diet induced obesity and insulin resistance through differential mechanisms in mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06447-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zou J., Chassaing B., Singh V., et al. Fiber-mediated nourishment of gut microbiota protects against diet-induced obesity by restoring IL-22-mediated colonic health. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shao T., Yu Q., Zhu T., et al. Inulin from Jerusalem artichoke tubers alleviates hyperglycaemia in high-fat-diet-induced diabetes mice through the intestinal microflora improvement. Br J Nutr. 2020;123:308–318. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519002332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Albouery M., Bretin A., Buteau B., et al. Soluble fiber inulin consumption limits alterations of the gut microbiota and hepatic fatty acid metabolism caused by high-fat diet. Nutrients. 2021;13:1–20. doi: 10.3390/nu13031037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Beisner J., Rosa L.F., Kaden-Volynets V., et al. Prebiotic inulin and sodium butyrate attenuate obesity-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction by induction of antimicrobial peptides. Front Immunol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.678360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Miles J.P., Zou J., Kumar M., et al. Supplementation of low- and high-fat diets with fermentable fiber exacerbates severity of DSS-induced acute colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23:1133–1143. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Singh V., Yeoh B.S., Walker R.E., et al. Microbiota fermentation-Nlrp3 axis shapes the impact of dietary fibres on intestinal inflammation. Gut. 2019;68:1801–1812. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
