Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
editorial
. 2023 Mar 21;15(6):1527–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2023.02.015

PFKFB4 Is a Metabolic Driver of HCC Progression and Chemoresistance Through ROS Mitigation

Paula Olaizola 1,2, Jesus M Banales 3,4,5,6,∗
PMCID: PMC10242301  PMID: 36963434

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent malignancies and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, representing a major social and health problem.1 The heterogeneity of HCCs at genomic, metabolic, and immune levels, together with other features, compromise the success of therapies.2,3 In particular, metabolic reprogramming is a well-stablished hallmark of cancer. To meet the high demand of energy and biomaterials to support uncontrolled growth, tumor cells acquire metabolic adaptations in response to a wide variety of extrinsic and intrinsic cell signals and remodel their nutrient absorption, energy production, and biomolecule synthetic mechanisms.4 These metabolic changes promote malignant cell transformation, as well as cancer cell growth and resistance to drugs.4

In this issue of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kam et al5 investigated the potential role of phosphofructokinase-fructose bisphosphatase 4 (PFKFB4), an activator of the key regulatory enzyme of glycolysis phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK1), in the pathogenesis of HCC. The investigators found that PFKFB4 expression was upregulated in HCC tumors from 3 independent cohorts of patients compared to non-malignant liver tissues, being associated with larger tumor size, advanced tumor stage or invasion, and reduced patient overall survival. Of note, the expression of PFKFB4 in HCC was also associated with the presence of TP53 gene mutations. These findings were validated further using Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats - CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) engineered TP53 knockout (KO) HCC cells. The authors also observed that the hyperactivation of Hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha under hypoxic stress promotes PFKFB4 expression. Hypoxia is known to activate multiple pro-angiogenic pathways and PFKFB4 has been shown to induce angiogenesis in certain solid tumors,6 but its role in HCC remains to be explored. Importantly, the experimental depletion (CRISPR-Cas9) of PFKFB4 in HCC cells reduces their tumorigenicity and metastatic capacity in subcutaneous and orthotopic mouse models of HCC. Nevertheless, those findings were not observed in vitro. Such discrepancy could be attributed to; i) in vitro culture media, which might not recapitulate the nutrient composition of the liver microenvironment during HCC development and progression, or ii) hypoxia achievement, since in vivo is more likely to be a gradual process rather than acute hypoxia, which was assayed in culture. On the other hand, PFKFB4-mediated glycolytic reprogramming has been shown to promote fibrosis,7 highlighting the need to explore its role in models of chronic liver injury and related HCC.

To elucidate the impact of PFKFB4 in the metabolic rewiring of HCC, metabolomic analyses were performed in the PFKFB4 KO HCC cells, revealing that PFKFB4 generally acts as a phosphatase mediating the dephosphorylation of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate into fructose-6-phosphate, which is the substrate of PFK1. Thus, PFKFB4 depletion in hypoxic conditions lead to the accumulation of downstream metabolites in glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway. Next, RNA sequencing analyses of the PFKFB4 KO and control xenografts were conducted, identifying 63 differentially expressed genes, 16 of which were found to be upregulated in the PFKFB4-depleted xenografts and 47 were found to be downregulated. Among the upregulated genes, half were hypoxia-responsive, of which 25% were involved in oxidative stress alleviation and the other 25% were involved in glycolysis. With the aim to unravel the potential effect of PFKFB4 loss on intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and tumorigenesis, the investigators evaluated ROS levels in PFKFB4 KO xenografts by flow cytometry, observing a 2- to 3-fold increase of ROS, which did not result in apoptosis. In this regard, sorafenib-induced cell death in HCC has been reported to be dependent on ROS generation.8 Because PFKFB4 appears to be involved in ROS mitigation through glucose metabolic reprogramming, the investigators evaluated the potential role of PFKFB4 in sorafenib cell resistance, demonstrating that PFKFB4-overexpressing cells and xenografts displayed higher tolerance to sorafenib and no reduction in tumor volume.

This study introduces PFKFB4 as a novel driver of hepatocarcinogenesis. The relevance of PKFKB4 in modulating oncometabolic processes in different cancers already has been reported, being PFKFB4 particularly associated with cancer cell survival and metastasis.9,10 The current study describes an original pro-oncogenic role of PFKFB4 in HCC through the reduction of ROS levels and as a promoter of sorafenib resistance. Importantly, this work complements previous findings reporting the influence of genomic mutations in TP53 and microenvironmental stress in PFKFB4 expression,11 and also reveals the clinical association between PFKFB4 overexpression and tumor aggressiveness in a subgroup of patients with HCC carrying loss-of-function TP53 mutations. Therefore, pharmacologic targeting of PFKFB4, alone or in combination with sorafenib, may represent a novel therapeutic avenue for patients with HCC, particularly for those harboring TP53 mutations, which deserves further investigation. Indeed, considering that the phosphatase function of PFKFB4 is predominant in the context of HCC, administration of the first-in-class PFKFB4 selective inhibitor 5MPN, which inhibits the fructose-6-phosphate binding site of the PFKFB4 kinase domain,12 could enhance the pro-oncogenic activity of PFKFB4. Hence, exploring and developing alternative PFKFB4 inhibitors to selectively block the phosphatase activity might provide novel therapeutic opportunities for patients with HCC. Furthermore, future studies should explore the role of PFKFB4 in the promotion of antigen cell presentation and response to immunotherapy (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open questions and future perspectives on the role of PFKFB4 in HCC pathogenesis and treatment. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; mut, mutation; PFKFB4, phosphofructokinase-fructose bisphosphatase 4; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest The author discloses no conflicts.

Funding Supported by the Spanish Carlos III Health Institute grants FIS PI18/01075, PI21/00922, and Miguel Servet CPII19/00008 (J.M.B.); “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional” grant PMP21/00080 (J.M.B.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas Spanish Carlos III Health Institute, Spain (J.M.B. and P.O.); Department of Health of the Basque Country grants 2020111077 and “Euskadi RIS3” 2022333032 (J.M.B.); La Caixa Scientific Foundation grant HR17-00601 (J.M.B.); PSC Partners US (J.M.B.); and PSC Supports UK grant 06119JB (J.M.B.); European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program grant 825510 ESCALON (J.M.B.); The Alan Morement Memorial Fund-The Cholangiocarcinoma Charity grant EU/2019/AMMFt/001 (J.M.B.); Basque Government grant POS_2022_1_0044 and the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver Juan Rodés Award 2022 (P.O.). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the article.

Contributor Information

Paula Olaizola, Email: paula.olaizola@ed.ac.uk.

Jesus M. Banales, Email: jesus.banales@biodonostia.org.

References

  • 1.Vogel A., Meyer T., Sapisochin G., et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2022;400:1345–1362. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Llovet J.M., Kelley R.K., Villanueva A., et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Llovet J.M., Ricci S., Mazzaferro V., et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–390. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Faubert B., Solmonson A., DeBerardinis R.J. Metabolic reprogramming and cancer progression. Science. 2020;368(6487):eaaw5473. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw5473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kam C.S., Wai-Hung Ho D., Sheung-In Ming V., et al. PFKFB4 drives the oncogenicity in TP53-mutated hepatocellular carcinoma in a phosphatase-dependent manner. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;15:1325–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2023.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li D., Tang J., Gao R., et al. PFKFB4 promotes angiogenesis via IL-6/STAT5A/P-STAT5 signaling in breast cancer. J Cancer. 2022;13:212–224. doi: 10.7150/jca.66773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee M.O., You C.H., Son M.Y., et al. Pro-fibrotic effects of PFKFB4-mediated glycolytic reprogramming in fibrous dysplasia. Biomaterials. 2016;107:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Coriat R., Nicco C., Cheŕeau C., et al. Sorafenib-induced hepatocellular carcinoma cell death depends on reactive oxygen species production in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:2284–2293. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goidts V., Bageritz J., Puccio L., et al. RNAi screening in glioma stem-like cells identifies PFKFB4 as a key molecule important for cancer cell survival. Oncogene. 2012;31:3235–3243. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ros S., Santos C.R., Moco S., et al. Functional metabolic screen identifies 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 4 as an important regulator of prostate cancer cell survival. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:328–343. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ros S., Flöter J., Kaymak I., et al. 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 4 is essential for p53-null cancer cells. Oncogene. 2017;36:3287–3299. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chesney J., Clark J., Lanceta L., et al. Targeting the sugar metabolism of tumors with a first-in-class 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB4) inhibitor. Oncotarget. 2015;6:18001–18011. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES