Skip to main content
BMC Women's Health logoLink to BMC Women's Health
. 2023 Jun 6;23:299. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02455-4

Knowledge and perceptions regarding Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and willingness to receive HPV vaccination among university students in a north-eastern city in Turkey

Ceren Varer Akpinar 1,, Sebnem Alanya Tosun 2
PMCID: PMC10243033  PMID: 37280608

Abstract

Background

For a HPV vaccination program to be successful, it is important that the target population has sufficient knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccines. The aim of this study was to evaluate HPV-related knowledge levels among students at a university in northern Turkey, to assess vaccination willingness, and to determine factors associated with HPV-related knowledge.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 824 (93.1%) students studying at 16 different faculties. The study population was identified through the proportional stratified sampling method. Data were collected through a questionnaire including socio-demographic characteristics and the HPV Knowledge Scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors that may be associated with knowledge scores.

Results

43.6% of the students had never heard of HPV, 50.6% of them had never heard of HPV screening tests or HPV vaccination. Only 2.7% of the students were vaccinated against HPV and 15.7% were willing to receive HPV vaccination. Awareness of HPV and willingness to receive vaccination were found to be higher among women, while previous experience with sexual intercourse was higher in men (p < 0.05). The mean HPV knowledge score was quite low (6.74 ± 7.13 out of 29 points). The studying in a field related to health sciences, being a senior student, intending to be vaccinated, being a woman, having had sex were found to be associated with high knowledge levels (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Educational programmes should be developed to increase university students' knowledge about HPV and the HPV vaccine.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02455-4.

Keywords: Human papillomavirus, HPV vaccine, Vaccination, Knowledge, University students

Background

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is one of the most frequently encountered sexually transmitted infections [1]. It is estimated that about 90% of sexually active men and 80% of sexually active women will be infected with various HPV types during their lives [2]. Fortunately, 90% of HPV infections disappear within 1–2 years without any symptoms, while 10% cause diseases. Among the disease-causing subtypes, low-risk genotypes (especially HPV 6 and 11) cause genital warts; whereas high-risk genotypes (especially HPV 16 and 18) are responsible for about 70% of all cervical cancer cases worldwide and are also being associated with head and neck and anogenital cancers [3]. Current estimates show that cervical cancer is the 4th most frequent cancer among women in the world (incidence: 15.6 per 100,000) [4], while it is the 9th most common cancer among women in Turkey (incidence: 4.2 per 100,000) [5].

In addition, in Islamic countries with a traditional culture such as Turkey, it may result in significant psychological consequences due to the sexually transmitted nature of the virus [6, 7]. In studies HPV infections result was associated with stigma, distress, unrealistic fear of cancer, and concerns over deteriorating of emotional relationships [6, 8, 9].

With the development of vaccines against critical HPV types (types 16 and 18), vaccination has become the primary preventative measure [10]. With the development of HPV vaccines, discussions about HPV vaccine and HPV-related diseases started in Turkey as well as in other countries of the world. In 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the inclusion of HPV vaccination in national immunization programs [11]. At the end of 2020, WHO announced a global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. Three main targets have been set to be achieved by 2030: vaccination (HPV vaccination of 90% of girls by the age of 15), screening (70% of women screened using a high-performance test by the age of 35, and again by the age of 45), and treatment (90% of women with pre-cancerous lesions treated and 90% of women with invasive cancer managed) [12, 13]. As of 2020, more than 100 countries have included HPV vaccinations in their national immunization programs [14, 15]. The bivalent, quadrivalent and 9-valent HPV vaccines are commercially available in Turkey but have not been included in the national immunization program.

Receiving HPV vaccination before sexual activity and before the first exposure to HPV is crucial [16, 17]. Although the age of first sexual intercourse varies according to countries and cultures, university age is generally accepted as the beginning of sexual activity in Turkey. There is growing evidence that sexually transmitted infections are on the rise among university students, and thus, it is clear that these students represent a high-risk group for HPV infection [18].

In order to carry out a successful HPV vaccination program, the target population should have adequate knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccines. Therefore, determining the level of HPV-related knowledge in the university student population can guide interventions and policies aimed at eliminating HPV-related cervical cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate knowledge and perceptions about HPV and HPV vaccines among students studying at Giresun University, to assess their willingness to be vaccinated, and to investigate factors associated with HPV-related knowledge.

Materials and methods

Design, participants and sampling

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Giresun University and included undergraduate students between February 2022 and April 2022. No special policies or news about HPV or HPV vaccination were released by the Ministry of Health or other organizations during the study period. The study population was to be selected from an overall pool of 9443 students enrolled in 16 faculties of the university. The pilot study was conducted in 20 participants to evaluate the comprehensiveness and language of the questionnaire. A target sample size of 885 students was determined using 50% prevalence with 5% error margin, 95% confidence interval, design effect 2 and 20% non-response rate. In sample selection, students were stratified according to their faculty first and then according to their grade level (years) in each faculty. The proportional stratified sample selection method was employed to select subjects in proportion for each faculty in the student pool. After the faculties were stratified according to grade level, simple random selection was made from each class list. The inclusion criteria for the study are as follows: to be a current student at the relevant university, to be native speakers to complete the questionnaire form in full. Participants filled out the questionnaire in-person with the self-report method. A total of 885 questionnaires were handed out, and the response rate was 93.1% (n = 824).

Instrument

The first part of questionnaire was designed by researchers, including 15 questions related to socio-demographic characteristics, medical history, sexual life and knowledge regarding HPV infection and vaccination. The second part of questionnaire was the HPV Knowledge Scale (HPV-KS), which is a 35-item scale developed by Waller et al. to measure knowledge about HPV, HPV vaccination and screening tests. It includes three subscales concerning general information regarding HPV infection/treatment, HPV screening, and HPV vaccination, while there is also an independent 6-item subscale [19]. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Demir et al. [20]. Cronbach's alpha value of the scale is 0.96. The first subscale includes questions about HPV risk factors, transmission route, prevention methods, general information about treatment of HPV infection; the second subscale assesses knowledge regarding pap smear and HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening; the third subscale evaluates knowledge about HPV vaccines and related diseases. Finally, the 6-item independent subscale examines knowledge status about the current vaccination schedule (in countries including HPV in their immunization programs). Since HPV vaccination is not included in the immunization program in our country, this last subscale was not applied. Each item in the questionnaire has three possible options (Yes/No/Don’t know). All items have a correct answer in the form of “Yes” or “No”; thus, the “Don’t know” option is always scored as an incorrect answer. Correct answers are scored as 1 point; incorrect answers are scored as 0 points. The scale has no breakpoints. Total scores range from 0 to 29, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was 0.94 for the current study.

Ethical considerations

All steps of the study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ordu University (January 19, 2022, no: 0685189). Additionally, permission to conduct the study on university students was obtained from the university administration.

Before completing the questionnaires, the participants were well informed about the purpose and contents of the study. Participants were asked to sign informed voluntary consent forms. To prevent response bias, participants were guaranteed anonymity and their personal information was kept strictly confidential. After data collection was completed, an informative online booklet about HPV and HPV vaccines containing the correct answers to the questions used to measure their knowledge levels was sent to the students via their university e-mail addresses.

Statistical analysis

Study data were evaluated using the SPSS 24.0 statistics program. Since much of the literature relies on data from studies conducted on females, many analyses were stratified according to sex. For descriptive analyses, numeric variables were described with mean and standard deviation, categorical variables were described as absolute and relative (%) frequencies. Normal distribution of data was evaluated with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, histograms, and skewness and kurtosis coefficients. According to these results, the independent samples t-test and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to evaluate relationships between HPV knowledge levels and independent variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors independently associated with HPV knowledge scores. The aim was to eliminate the effect of confounding factors with multiple regression analysis. Variables that were found to be related with HPV knowledge scores in univariate analyses were included in the regression model. Of note, 33 data identified by their Mahalanobis values before regression were not included in the analysis. Significance level was accepted as p < 0.05, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

Results

A total of 824 university students participated in the study. Table 1 shows the socio-demographics characteristics of participating students. The mean age of students was 21.4 ± 3.4 years. They were from 16 different faculties/vocational schools. The study group included students from 68 of the 81 provinces in Turkey.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of participating students (= 824)

Variables n %
Sex
 Female 512 62.1
 Male 312 37.9
Region
 West 164 19.9
 South 94 11.4
 Middle 85 10.3
 East 127 15.4
 North 354 43.0
Place of family’s residence
 Rural 682 82.8
 Urban 142 17.2
Faculty
 Health sciences 132 16.0
 Others 692 84.0
Class level
 1 182 22.1
 2 211 25.6
 3 197 23.9
  ≥ 4 234 28.4
Perception of income
 Good 160 19.4
 Average 551 66.9
 Bad 113 13.7

The medical / sexual histories and HPV-related characteristics of participants are described in Table 2. Overall, 24.4% of students stated that they had experienced sexual intercourse. Mean age at first sexual intercourse was 19 ± 2.7 years (females: 22.2 ± 4.7, males: 18.8 ± 2.0). Among students, 43.6% had never heard of HPV, 50.6% had never heard of HPV screening tests and HPV vaccination. Among students, only 2.7% had been vaccinated against HPV and only 15.7% were willing to receive HPV vaccination. A family history of genital cancer, visiting a physician in the last year, being aware of HPV/HPV screening tests and/or HPV vaccination, and willingness to get vaccinated were found to be higher in females, whereas males were more likely to have had sexual intercourse before the study (p < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Medical and sexual history and HPV related characteristics of participating students (Overall and stratified for sex) (= 824)

Variables Total Female Male P
n % n % n %
History of genital cancer in the family
 Yes 26 3.2 22 4.3 4 1.3 0.011
 No 798 96.8 490 95.7 308 98.7
Ever had sex before
 Yes 201 24.4 69 13.5 132 42.3 <0.001
 No 623 75.6 443 86.5 180 57.7
Age at first sexual intercoursea
 16–18 72 39.3 8 11.6 64 56.1 <0.001
  ≥ 19 111 60.7 61 88.4 50 43.9
Physician visit within last year
 Gynecologist/urologist 49 5.9 44 8.6 5 1.6 <0.001
 Other physician 534 64.8 336 65.6 198 63.5
 No 241 29.2 132 25.8 109 34.9
Having heard about HPV
 Yes, has sufficient knowledge 114 13.8 86 16.8 28 9.0 <0.001
 Yes, does not have sufficient knowledge 351 42.6 251 49.0 100 32.1
 No 359 43.6 175 34.2 184 59.0
Having heard about HPV screening tests
 Yes, has sufficient knowledge 95 11.5 68 13.3 27 8.7 <0.001
 Yes, does not have sufficient knowledge 312 37.9 223 43.6 89 28.5
 No 417 50.6 221 43.2 196 62.8
Having heard about HPV vaccination
 Yes, has sufficient knowledge 125 15.2 92 18.0 33 10.6 <0.001
 Yes, does not have sufficient knowledge 282 34.2 214 41.8 68 21.8
 No 417 50.6 206 40.2 211 67.6
Having received HPV vaccination
 Yes 22 2.7 18 3.5 4 1.3 0.059
 No 802 97.3 494 96.5 308 98.7
Willing to receive HPV vaccination
 Yes 129 15.7 104 20.3 25 8.0 <0.001
 No idea 363 44.1 217 42.4 146 46.8
 No 332 40.3 191 37.3 141 45.2

aPercentage calculated among students who had had sex before and were willing to state when

Figure 1 shows the reasons for refusal of HPV vaccination by the students. The most common reasons were the following: Believing HPV vaccination was unnecessary (30.2%), being afraid of any vaccine (18.7%), not knowing about HPV (17.1%).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Reasons associated with refusal of vaccination against HPV (%) (n = 695)

The average mean score of the students’ HPV-KS was 6.74 ± 7.13 (highest score possible: 29 points). General HPV knowledge mean score was 4.68 ± 4.42, HPV screening test knowledge mean score was 0.80 ± 1.38, and HPV vaccination knowledge mean score was 1.25 ± 1.92 points. HPV knowledge scale total score and subscale mean scores were significantly higher in women (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Human papillomavirus knowledge scale and subscale mean scores of participating students (Overall and stratified for sex) (n = 824)

Total Female Male P *
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
HPV-KS (max score: 29) 6.74 ± 7.13 7.18 ± 7.47 6.01 ± 6.50 0.012
The general HPV knowledge (max score: 16) 4.68 ± 4.42 4.90 ± 4.54 4.31 ± 4.20 0.041
The HPV screening test knowledge (max score: 6) 0.80 ± 1.38 0.87 ± 1.44 0.68 ± 1.27 0.042
The general HPV vaccination knowledge (max score: 7) 1.25 ± 1.92 1.40 ± 2.05 1.01 ± 1.65 0.003

*Student t-test

With the HPV knowledge scale and subscale scores of the students; a relationship was found between sex, faculty, grade level, income, sexual intercourse status, doctor visit, HPV vaccine willingness (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S1).

To clarify parameters independently associated with HPV knowledge levels, we created a multiple linear regression model by including variables that were found to be statistically significant in univariate analyses. The model generated was significant (F = 19.70, p < 0.001); together with the relevant variables, it explained 42% of the change in HPV knowledge (adjusted R2 = 0.418). According to the regression analysis, being a female, studying health sciences, being a 4th year student, to have had sex previously, having visited a gynecologist / urologist within the last year, and being willing to receive HPV vaccination were identified as factors that were independently associated with higher levels of HPV knowledge (p < 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression analysis of factors associated with HPV knowledge

Variable B Std. Error β t p 95% CI
Sex (Female) 2.52 0.43 0.17 5.75  < 0.001 1.66 3.38
Faculty (Health Sciences) 7.23 0.57 0.36 12.47  < 0.001 6.00 8.25
Class, years (4th year) 3.27 0.44 0.20 7.29  < 0.001 2.39 4.15
Perception of income (good/very good) 0.46 0.51 0.02 0.90 0.36 -0.54 1.46
Ever had sex (Yes) 2.06 0.49 0.12 4.15  < 0.001 1.08 3.03
Physician visit within last year (Gynecologist/urologist) 1.82 0.85 0.06 2.13  < 0.03 1.14 3.50
Willing to receive HPV vaccination (Yes) 4.18 0.60 0.21 6.95  < 0.001 3.00 5.36

R 2:0.418 f:19.70 p < 0.00

Discussion

This study evaluated the HPV and HPV vaccination-related knowledge levels of Turkish university students, who are the target population for HPV vaccination due to the estimated age of first sexual experience.

Approximately one-fourth of the students in the study group stated that they had sexual intercourse before, but men had almost three times greater frequency than that of women. In our study, the average age of first sexual intercourse was 19, but this value was higher among women. The age at first sexual intercourse differs with respect to countries and cultural contexts. The average age of sexual intercourse is around 19 in some western European countries, 17 in China and 16 in the United States. However, in these studies, no sex-based difference was observed in terms of the age of first sexual experience [2123]. Despite the changing attitudes under the influence of western culture in Turkey, sexual intercourse at an early age and before marriage is not approved in traditional culture [24]. This view is generally dominant for women in the context of sex inequality. This may explain the sex-based difference in the frequency of having experienced sexual intercourse in our study.

In our study group, 44% of participants had never heard of HPV, 51% had never heard of HPV screening tests or HPV vaccines. These rates were lower in women than in men. In a study conducted with university students in China, 49% of them stated that they had never heard of HPV and 51% of them stated that they had never heard about the HPV vaccine, and this rate was found to be significantly lower in women than in men similar to our study [22]. Another study conducted in Thailand showed that 73.8% of male students and 69.6% of female students did not know who should be screened for cervical cancer [25]. In studies conducted in European countries and the USA, the rate of hearing about HPV and HPV vaccine was reported as 82–90%, which is considerably higher than our study results. However, similar sex-based differences were also shown in these studies [2629]. In most western countries, HPV vaccination is part of the national vaccination program, especially for females, and training on HPV is provided during school years. HPV vaccine is not yet included in the national vaccination program in Turkey and there is no HPV-related program in the education curricula. Studies confirm that education about HPV will increase the level of HPV knowledge [30, 31]. This difference between countries may be due to the training activities carried out within the scope of the national immunization program.

Vaccination rates against HPV are very low in the study group. Only 2.7% were vaccinated against HPV. In many European countries, almost 80% of the target population has been vaccinated [32]. In a study conducted with female university students in Poland, a country which does not have a HPV immunization program, vaccination rates against HPV were below 10% [33]. Lower vaccination rates may be related to the lack of government-supported subsidy programs for HPV vaccination or inclusion in national immunization programs. It is expected that higher vaccination rates will be observed in countries that have included the HPV vaccine in their vaccination program.

In the present study, while 16% of participants were willing to be vaccinated, 40% were undecided about HPV vaccination, and 44% did not want to be vaccinated. While the desire to be vaccinated was higher in women, indecision was similar for both sexes. There are a wide variety of behavioral approaches from country to country to improve HPV vaccination intent. In a study conducted in Hong Kong, 13.3% of individuals were vaccinated against HPV and 69.6% of students stated that they planned to be vaccinated [34]. A similar study conducted in Korea similarly reported a 62.8% intention to vaccinate among participants [35]. In general, the willingness to be vaccinated is higher in western countries [32]. The high frequency of students unwilling to vaccinate in our study group may be related to low level of knowledge or being used to receiving free-of-charge vaccination by the government. Therefore, in addition to the lack of information, relatively high vaccination costs when met with sufficient information may lead to low rates of vaccination against HPV. Other studies have also reported that the costs associated with HPV vaccines may be an obstacle to HPV vaccination [36, 37]. In developing countries such as Turkey, where the HPV vaccine is not included in the national program, HPV vaccine becomes a privilege that can be accessed by those with higher socioeconomic status.

Although almost half of the students included in this study were aware about HPV, HPV screening tests and HPV vaccination; however, their knowledge scores were unfortunately quite low. The level of knowledge about HPV was lower compared to studies conducted in developed countries [26, 28, 29, 34]. The low level of knowledge is probably related to the limited importance given to HPV in education programs in Turkey. Awareness trainings are insufficient in terms of content and frequency. This might result from the traditional Turkish cultural context, which fosters a conservative attitude toward sex issues. In an intervention study conducted with high school students in Sweden, it was shown that knowledge significantly increased among male and female students after training on HPV and HPV prevention [38]. In this context, before the HPV vaccine is added to the national immunization program, it may be important to include education programs on sexually transmitted diseases and HPV into the education curriculum.

In our study, knowledge scores on HPV, HPV screening and HPV vaccine were found to be higher in women. In the literature, similar studies conducted with the participation of students from countries with different levels of development have shown that women generally have better knowledge and attitudes towards HPV than men [22, 26, 30]. The low level of knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccination in men with sexual experience at an earlier age increases the risk of HPV transmission [39]. Health promotion efforts to prevent HPV infection have focused primarily on cervical cancer which is unrelated to male health. Therefore, male students may be less aware of the potential impact of HPV infection on them and the benefits of vaccination.

This study also showed that students studying in non-health-related programs have less knowledge about HPV than students studying in health-related faculties/vocational schools. Studies conducted on students in the field of health sciences have shown that they have more awareness about HPV and HPV vaccines [40, 41]. A study conducted in Portugal revealed that students studying in health science departments were more likely to have heard about HPV than students from other departments [42]. It is to be expected that students in health-related fields will learn more about HPV infection and cervical cancer. Significantly higher scores among students in health-related programs may mean that better education is effective in improving students' knowledge and attitudes about HPV and HPV vaccination. However, the level of knowledge about general health, such as HPV, should be at a certain level in all young people, regardless of their field of education. In addition, in our study, the level of knowledge about HPV, HPV screening and HPV vaccination was found to be higher in senior students, regardless of the faculty they studied. In the international literature, it was stated that the level of knowledge about HPV increases with increasing age among students [43]. In our study, knowledge levels about HPV, HPV screening and HPV vaccines were found to be higher in those who had sexual intercourse before. In another study, the level of knowledge of those with sexual experience was found to be higher [44]. HPV vaccines are established to be most effective when administered before the onset of sexual activity. Sexually active people may benefit less because they may have already been exposed to one or more of the HPV types targeted by the vaccine. For this reason, it is important to provide information about HPV and HPV vaccination at an early age, particularly before first sexual experience.

Willingness to receive the HPV vaccination was significantly associated with knowledge scores for HPV for both male and female participants. This study shows that the level of knowledge is higher among those who are willing to be vaccinated. This is consistent with previous studies that found an association between greater knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccines and intention to vaccinate [22, 34, 4547]. Knowledge is an important indicator of willingness to vaccinate and vaccination rates. Therefore, education to increase knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccines will increase both willingness to be vaccinated and vaccination rates.

Most studies on HPV and HPV vaccination in Turkey generally focus only on women, and few studies have analyzed HPV-related knowledge in both males and females. This study has the advantages of obtaining a good sample size with appropriate sample selection, lack of refusal in participation, and that the selected group represented students who originated from the great majority of the country’s provinces. In addition, a scale with proven validity and reliability was used to evaluate the level of knowledge. However, there are some limitations of our study. First, the population of this study is not representative of the general youth population in Turkey, as it consists of university students. Second, we should take caution when interpreting the findings of our study, because a drawback of the cross-sectional study design is the lack of causality assessment.

Conclusion

Even among university students, who are a more educated group in Turkey, knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccination is at a very low level. In addition, HPV vaccination rates and vaccination intent appear to be very low. Despite having sexual experience at an earlier age, the knowledge level of men about HPV and HPV vaccine is lower. Students who have higher knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccine have a higher willingness to vaccinate.

The results of this study show that there is a need for education programs on HPV infection and vaccination. Studies should be conducted on the effectiveness of HPV-related educational interventions on willingness to be vaccinated. Before inclusion of HPV vaccination in the national immunization program, it is necessary to carry out health promotion studies and policies in order to improve the knowledge and attitudes regarding HPV and HPV vaccination, particularly for young men. The results of these studies should be taken into account when developing interventions and policies to eradicate HPV-related cervical cancer in countries where the HPV vaccine is not included in the national immunization program.

Supplementary Information

12905_2023_2455_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the students.

Abbreviations

HPV

Human papillomavirus

WHO

World health organization

FDA

Food and drug administration

Authors’ contributions

All authors discussed their research goals, objectives, and questions and participated in the phases of this study, recruitment and data collection (S.A.T), data analysis, interpretation (C.V.A), writing the article and reviewing the article critically (C.V.A, S.A.T). All authors have read and approved the final article.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All steps of the study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ordu University (January 19, 2022, no: 0685189). Additionally, participants were asked to sign informed voluntary consent forms and necessary information about the study was given.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Barros GS, Araujo ED, Santos FLSG, Batista MVA. Application of an entropy-based computational strategy to identify genomic markers for molecular detection and typing of human papillomavirus. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;77:104048. doi: 10.1016/j.meeg&#x00131;d.2019.104048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chesson HW, Dunne EF, Hariri S, Markowitz LE. The estimated lifetime probability of acquiring human papillomavirus in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41(11):660–664. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Collado JJ, Gómez D, Muñoz J, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. 2021. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in the World. Summary Report. https://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/XWX.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2022.
  • 4.World Health Organization. Global Health Estimates 2020: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2019. 2020. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death. Accessed 4 Mar 2022.
  • 5.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/CAAC.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Qaderi K, Mirmolaei ST, Geranmayeh M, Sheikh Hasani S, Farnam F. Iranian women’s psychological responses to positive HPV test result: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01272-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Daley EM, Perrin KM, Mcdermott RJ, Vamos CA, Rayko HL, Packing-Ebuen JL, et al. The Psychosocial Burden of HPV: a mixed-method study of knowledge, attitudes and behaviors among HPV+ women. J Health Psychol. 2010;15(2):279–290. doi: 10.1177/1359105309351249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Perrin KM, Daley EM, Naoom SF, Packing-Ebuen JL, Rayko HL, McFarlane M, et al. Women’s reactions to HPV diagnosis: Insights from in-depth interviews. Women Health. 2006;43(2):93–110. doi: 10.1300/J013v43n02_06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pourmohsen M, Simbar M, Nahidi F, Fakor F, Majd HA. Women’s experiences of infection with human papillomavirus in the face of disease symptoms: a qualitative study. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci. 2020;8(1):37–45. doi: 10.15296/ijwhr.2020.05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Durusoy R, Yamazhan M, Taşbakan MI, et al. HPV vaccine awareness and willingness of first-year students entering university in Western Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(6):1695–1701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization WHO position on HPV vaccines. Vaccine. 2009;27(52):7236–7237. doi: 10.1016/j.vacc&#x00131;ne.2009.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.World Health Organization. Global Strategy to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer as a Public Health Problem. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240014107. Accessed 4 Mar 2022.
  • 13.Simelela PN. WHO global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem: an opportunity to make it a disease of the past. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152(1):1–3. doi: 10.1002/&#x00131;jgo.13484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.World Health Organization. Immunization Analysis and Insights. 2020. https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/immunization-analysis-and-insights/surveillance. Accessed 28 Mar 2022.
  • 15.World Health Organization. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage. 2021. https://immunizationdata.who.int/pages/coverage/hpv.html. Accessed 5 May 2022.
  • 16.World Health Organization. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage monitoring manual. 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331807. Accessed 18 May 2022.
  • 17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommendations on the use of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in males--Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(50):1705-8. [PubMed]
  • 18.Xue L, Hu W, Zhang H, et al. Awareness of and willingness to be vaccinated by human papillomavirus vaccine among junior middle school students in Jinan China. Hum Vacin Immunother. 2018;14(2):404–411. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1393132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Waller J, Ostini R, Marlow LAV, McCaffery K, Zimet G. Validation of a measure of knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV) using item response theory and classical test theory. Prev Med. 2013;56(1):35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Demir F. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Human Papilloma Virus Knowledge Scale. University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Institute of Health Sciences, Public Health Nursing, Master Thesis, Ankara. 2019.
  • 21.Lawn RB, Sallis HM, Wootton RE, et al. The effects of age at menarche and first sexual intercourse on reproductive and behavioural outcomes: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dai Z, Si M, Su X, et al. Willingness to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and influencing factors among male and female university students in China. J Med Virol. 2021;94(6):2776–2786. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mendez Rojas B, Beogo I, Owili PO, Adesanya O, Chen CY. Community social capital on the timing of sexual debut and teen birth in Nicaragua: a multilevel approach. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:991. doi: 10.1186/S12889-016-3666-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cinar I, Ozkan S, Aslan G, Alatas E. Knowledge and behavior of university students toward human papillomavirus and vaccination. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019;6(3):300–307. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_10_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Songthap A, Pitisuttithum P, Kaewkungwal J, Fungladda W, Bussaratid V. Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of a human papilloma virus vaccine among students, parents and teachers in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012;43(2):340–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Blödt S, Holmberg C, Müller-Nordhorn J, Rieckmann N. Human Papillomavirus awareness, knowledge and vaccine acceptance: a survey among 18–25 year old male and female vocational school students in Berlin Germany. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(6):808–813. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Beshers SC, Murphy JM, Fix BV, Mahoney MC. Sex differences among college students in awareness of the human papillomavirus vaccine and vaccine options. J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(2):144–147. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.975720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barnard M, George P, Perryman ML, Wolff LA. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and uptake in college students: implications from the precaution adoption process model. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kasymova S, Harrison SE, Pascal C. Knowledge and awareness of human papillomavirus among college students in South Carolina. Infect Dis. 2019;12:117863371882507. doi: 10.1177/1178633718825077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim HW, Park S, Ahn HY, Park EJ. The effects of an HPV education program by gender among Korean university students. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(4):562–567. doi: 10.1016/J.nedt.2014.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yanikkerem E, Piyan G, Kavlak T, Karadeniz G. Assessing the role of education on Turkish university students’ knowledge about HPV and related diseases. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(6):1703–1711. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lévy-Bruhl D, Bousquet V, King LA, et al. The current state of introduction of HPV vaccination into national immunisation schedules in Europe: results of the VENICE 2008 survey. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(15):2709–2713. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kamzol W, Jaglarz K, Tomaszewski KA, Puskulluoglu M, Krzemieniecki K. Assessment of knowledge about cervical cancer and its prevention among female students aged 17–26 years. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166(2):196–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chiang VCL, Wong HT, Yeung PCA, et al. Attitude, acceptability and knowledge of HPV vaccination among local university students in Hong Kong. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(5):486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kang HY, Kim JS. Knowledge, attitudes of human papillomavirus vaccine, and intention to obtain vaccine among Korean Female undergraduate students. Women Health. 2011;51:759–776. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2011.627091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Daley MF, Liddon N, Crane LA, et al. A national survey of pediatrician knowledge and attitudes regarding human papillomavirus vaccination. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):2280–2289. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tissot AM, Zimet GD, Rosenthal SL, Bernstein DI, Wetzel C, Kahn JA. Effective strategies for HPV vaccine delivery: the views of pediatricians. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41(2):119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gottvall Rn M, Tydén T, Höglund AT, Larsson M. Knowledge of human papillomavirus among high school students can be increased by an educational intervention. Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21(8):558–562. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2010.010063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.AdjeiBoakye E, Tobo BB, Rojek RP, Mohammed KA, Geneus CJ, Osazuwa-Peters N. Approaching a decade since HPV vaccine licensure: racial and gender disparities in knowledge and awareness of HPV and HPV vaccine. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(11):2713–2722. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1363133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rajiah K, Maharajan MK, Chin NS, Num KSF. Awareness and acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccination among health sciences students in Malaysia. Virus Dis . 2015;26(4):297. doi: 10.1007/S13337-015-0287-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pelullo CP, Esposito MR, Di Giuseppe G. Human papillomavirus infection and vaccination: Knowledge and attitudes among nursing students in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(10):1770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Medeiros R, Ramada D. Knowledge differences between male and female university students about human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer: implications for health strategies and vaccination. Vaccine. 2010;29(2):153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.vacc&#x00131;ne.2010.10.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Suryadevara M, Bonville JR, Kline RM, et al. Student HPV vaccine attitudes and vaccine completion by education level. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(6):1491–1497. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1123359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Oz M, Cetinkaya N, Apaydin A, et al. Awareness and knowledge levels of Turkish college students about human papilloma virus infection and vaccine acceptance. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(2):260–268. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1116-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zimet GD, Weiss TW, Rosenthal SL, Good MB, Vichnin MD. Reasons for non-vaccination against HPV and future vaccination intentions among 19–26 year-old women. BMC women’s health. 2010;10(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-10-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Santhanes D, Yong CP, Yap YY, Saw PS, Chaiyakunapruk N, Khan TM. Factors influencing intention to obtain the HPV vaccine in South East Asian and Western Pacific regions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3640. doi: 10.1038/S41598-018-21912-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tung WC, Lu M, Qiu X, Ervin S. Human papillomavirus knowledge, attitudes, and vaccination among Chinese college students in the United States. Vaccine. 2019;37(24):3199–3204. doi: 10.1016/j.vacc&#x00131;ne.2019.04.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12905_2023_2455_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Women's Health are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES