Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: BJOG. 2020 Oct 9;128(5):827–836. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16498

Maternal risk of hypertension 7-15 Years after pregnancy: clues from the placenta

Claudia B Holzman 1, Patricia Senagore 2, Jia Xu 3, Galit L Dunietz 4, Kelly L Strutz 5, Yan Tian 6, Bertha L Bullen 7, Megan Eagle 8, Janet M Catov 9
PMCID: PMC10243612  NIHMSID: NIHMS1631561  PMID: 32931608

Abstract

Objective

To assess if pre-eclampsia (PE)-related placental/extraplacental membrane findings are linked to moderately-elevated blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy and later-life hypertension.

Design

Prospective Cohort

Setting

52 prenatal clinics, 5 Michigan communities

Sample

The POUCH Study recruited women at 16–27 weeks’ gestation (1998–2004) and studied a sub-cohort in-depth. This sample (n=490) includes sub-cohort women with detailed placental assessments and cardiovascular health evaluations 7–15 years later in the POUCHmoms follow-up study.

Methods

PE-related placental/extraplacental membrane findings (i.e. mural hyperplasia, unaltered/abnormal vessels, or atherosis in decidua; infarcts) were evaluated in relation to pregnancy BP and odds of Stage 2 hypertension at follow-up using weighted polytomous regression. Follow-up hypertension odds also were compared in 3 pregnancy BP groups, i.e. normotensives (referent), and moderately-elevated BP with or without PE-related placental/extraplacental membrane findings.

Main Outcome Measures

Stage 2 hypertension (SBP ≥140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥90 mmHg, or using antihypertensive medications) at follow-up.

Results

After removing women with pregnancy hypertension (i.e. chronic, PE, gestational), mural hyperplasia and unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels were each associated with Stage 2 hypertension at follow-up, adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 2.7 (95% CI 1.1,6.6), and 1.7 (95% CI 0.8, 3.4) respectively. Women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy and evidence of mural hyperplasia or unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels had greater odds of Stage 2 hypertension at follow-up, aOR= 4.5 (95% CI 1.6, 12.5) and 2.6 (95% CI 1.1, 5.9) respectively.

Conclusions

PE-related placental/extraplacental membrane findings help risk stratify women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy for later development of hypertension.

Keywords: Epidemiology: General Obstetrics, Maternal Physiology, Medical Disorders in Pregnancy, Placental Pathology, Risk Management, Translational Research

Tweetable Abstract

Placental findings associated with mother’s risk of later-life hypertension

Introduction

Among women, a larger percentage of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is attributable to hypertension as compared to men(1), and women experience blood pressure (BP) increases at a younger age.(2) Early identification of women at increased risk of hypertension, close monitoring and timely interventions could mitigate diseases such as CVD and chronic kidney disease. Studies consistently observe a positive link between pre-eclampsia (PE) in pregnancy and a woman’s risk of later-life hypertension and CVD(36). Investigators hypothesize that PE and later-life hypertension share underlying risk factors that pre-date pregnancy(7), and the physiological experience of PE might contribute to later hypertension and CVD(8). Currently, the American Heart Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend using history of PE for CVD risk stratification and targeted medical care management.(9)

Recently we reported on blood pressure (BP) among women in the Pregnancy Outcomes and Community Health (POUCH) Study who were re-evaluated in the POUCHmoms Study 7–15 years later. Those with even moderately-elevated BP during the POUCH Study pregnancy (defined by 2015 criteria for ‘pre-hypertension’ in non-pregnant populations) were more likely to have hypertension at follow-up with an odds ratio of 2.6 compared to normotensive in pregnancy.(10) A considerable proportion of POUCH Study women, 64%, met the criteria for moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy. We hypothesized that within this large group a subset carried the greatest risk for later-life hypertension, potentially with underlying pathology similar to that of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

To examine this hypothesis we used placental/extraplacental membrane pathology data and pregnancy BP data from the original POUCH Study in combination with BP data from the POUCHmoms follow-up. We focused on placental/extraplacental membrane maternal vessel findings frequently associated with PE, i.e. unusually thick maternal vessel walls (mural hyperplasia), decreased remodeling of maternal vessels, placental disc infarcts, and decidual blood vessel ‘atherosis’. We also considered placental evidence of chorioamnionitis, a pathology not typically linked to PE, to make sure our findings were specific to PE-related placental pathology. Our main goals were to answer the following questions: 1) Is PE-associated placental/extraplacental membrane pathology related to an increased risk of moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy? 2) After excluding women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, is PE-associated placental/extraplacental membrane pathology linked to an increased risk of later-life hypertension? and 3) Does the presence/absence of PE-associated placental/extraplacental membrane modify the relation between moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy and risk of later-life hypertension?

Materials and Methods

Study design

This prospective cohort includes a pregnancy study, the POUCH Study, and a maternal follow-up component, the POUCHmoms Study(11). The POUCH Study enrolled 3,019 pregnant women at 16–27 weeks’ gestation (1998–2004) from 52 clinics in five Michigan communities(12) with the aim of studying biological and social factors affecting adverse pregnancy outcomes. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy with no known congenital anomaly, maternal age ≥ 15, maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) screening, no pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus, and English speaking. Approval for this study was obtained from institutional review boards at MSU, Michigan Department of Community Health, and nine community hospitals. This study did not include core outcome sets and participants were not directly involved in shaping the research.

To conserve resources, a sub-cohort of 1,371 POUCH Study participants was studied in greater depth (e.g. medical records abstracted, biological samples analyzed, placental pathology). The sub-cohort was constructed by oversampling women with preterm delivery (PTD) and women with a higher risk of pregnancy complications (i.e. African Americans, women with high MSAFP). To account for the cohort and sub-cohort sampling strategy, inverse-probability sampling weights are used in all POUCH and POUCHmoms Study analyses. For example, African-American women, women with high MSAFP and women with PTD who were oversampled into the sub-cohort are assigned a ‘smaller weight’ so that they represent their proportion in the eligible population agreeing to participate in the original POUCH Study.

Of the 1,371 sub-cohort women, 1,280 did not decline future study participation and were presumed alive at the initiation of the POUCHmoms Study (Figure S1), which was designed primarily to assess risk factors for early evidence of CVD at 7–15 years post-POUCH Study pregnancy. Between 2011 and 2014, 678 POUCHmoms Study participants completed interviews and CVD-related assessments, i.e. BP, carotid ultrasounds, anthropometrics, heart rate variability and blood biomarkers. Women’s age at follow-up ranged from 25 to 58 years. For the current analyses we removed women if they lacked complete placenta information, i.e. placentas not saved at delivery or insufficient decidual tissue for assessment (n=160), had chronic hypertension before/during the POUCH Study pregnancy (n=22), or were missing prenatal records (n=6), which led to a final sample of 490 women.

Measures

Blood pressure in pregnancy

Eight pregnancy BP measures were abstracted from the medical records, i.e. the two highest systolic blood pressures (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) recorded before 20 weeks’ gestation, and the two highest SBP and DBP recorded at or after 20 weeks’ gestation. Women were categorized into four groups: 1) normal BP, i.e. SBP < 120 mmHg and DBP < 80 mmHg or can exceed this only one time; 2) moderately-elevated BP, i.e. at least two SBP ≥ 120 mmHg or at least two DBP ≥ 80 mmHg but no hypertensive disorder of pregnancy; 3) gestational hypertension (GH), i.e. explicit diagnosis of GH in medical records and/SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg on two occasions after 20 weeks’ gestation without proteinuria; and 4) PE, i.e. the criteria of group 3 plus proteinuria. Groups 3 and 4 criteria were standard at the time of the POUCH Study(13) and details of the data/process used for group assignment appear in a previous POUCH Study publication.(14)

Placental pathology findings

The POUCH Study developed a detailed protocol for placental evaluation.(12) Briefly, formalin-fixed placentas were examined grossly and nine tissue samples were embedded in paraffin blocks for microscopic assessment: two extra-placental membrane (membrane roll) samples; two umbilical cord samples (one proximal and one distal to disc insertion); and five full-thickness disc samples, one at the cord insertion, one in central tissue that appeared normal on gross exam, two from central tissue and one at the margin (these latter three were representative of grossly visible abnormalities if present). The study pathologist (PKS) was blinded to all clinical data and to gross examination findings when performing microscopic examinations.

Of particular interest for these analyses, the pathologist recorded two groups of placental/extra-placental membrane findings often linked to PE. The first group, known as ‘maternal vascular-developmental,’ included mural hyperplasia and unaltered/abnormal decidual (meaning inadequately remodeled or otherwise abnormal) vessels (Figure S2a, b, c, d).(15) Mural hyperplasia, defined as an increased thickening of the decidual vessel wall with three or more visible muscle cell layers and decreased luminal diameter, was not common in POUCH Study placentas. Only 15% of placentas showed evidence of mural hyperplasia in one or more of the seven decidual samples examined per placenta. Therefore, one positive decidual sample was the cut-point for a positive placenta. By contrast, unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels often appeared in a single decidual sample but less often were observed in two or more decidual samples (about 38% of placentas), therefore the latter was used as the cut-point for positive. Previous POUCH Study results showed these placental findings, using the aforementioned cut-points, were associated with an increased risk of both medically indicated and spontaneous PTD at < 35 weeks’ gestation.(15)

A second group of PE-related placental findings, ‘maternal vascular obstructive,’ included infarcts and decidual blood vessel ‘atherosis’.(15) (Figure S2e) Some pathologists consider placenta margin infarcts as less important/informative than central disc infarcts,(16, 17) motivating us to evaluate the two locations separately. We categorized ‘atherosis’, margin infarcts, and central disc infarcts as present if observed in any one placental/extra-placental membrane sample. In our previous work ‘atherosis’ and infarcts were associated with increased risk of medically indicated PTD.(15)

As a test of specificity, we also considered histologic chorioamnionitis (HCA) which typically is not associated with PE. HCA, defined as an advanced maternal inflammatory response or fetal inflammatory response in the chorion/amnion, was linked to increased risk of spontaneous PTD at < 35 weeks’ gestation in the POUCH Study.(12)

Blood pressure at follow-up

BP measures in the POUCHmoms Study were obtained by study nurses or ultrasonographers who followed the Joint National Committee (JNC) guidelines(18). Women sat with the arm extended level to the heart and three consecutive BPs were recorded one minute apart using either a Panasonic EW3109W (Panasonic Corp., Newark, NJ) or an Omron Hem-907 (Omron Healthcare, Inc., Lake Forest, IL) with a small, medium, or large cuff as indicated by arm size. Digital monitors were compared with manual readings to ensure accuracy. The second and third BP measures were averaged to create a final SBP and DBP. According to JNC-8 Guidelines, women were categorized as either normotensive/slightly elevated BP (SBP < 130 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg), Stage I hypertension (SBP between 130–139 mmHg and/or DBP between 80–89 mmHg), or Stage 2 hypertension (SBP ≥140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥90 mmHg or using antihypertensive medications). The normal BP and the slightly elevated BP were combined due to the small number of the latter.

Covariates

Women’s age (continuous) and body mass index (BMI, continuous) at enrollment in the POUCH Study, number of years to the follow-up visit (continuous 7–15 years), race/ethnicity (binary: White/other and African American), and smoking status during pregnancy (yes, no) were each evaluated as potential confounding variables in our analyses. Pregnancy BMI was highly correlated with BMI at follow-up; we chose to use the former given that follow-up BMI can’t directly influence previous placental findings (and therefore is not a direct confounder).

Analytic Strategy

Analyses were performed with survey procedures in SAS v9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) to account for the original POUCH Study sampling design and weighting. Maternal characteristics were compared between the POUCHmoms Study follow-up sample with our inclusion criteria (n=490) and the remaining sub-cohort POUCH Study mothers (Chi-square test). We first evaluated placental findings (positive and negative cut-points described above) as ‘exposure variables’ with a four-level ‘outcome variable’ of maternal BP in pregnancy, i.e. normal BP, moderately-elevated BP, GH, PE (Chi-square test). Next we used weighted polytomous regression models, unadjusted and adjusted with all the previously described covariates, to assess associations between the ‘exposure variable, ‘ placental findings, and our three-level ‘outcome variable’ of BP at follow-up after removing women with GH and PE.

In a final set of analyses we considered whether placental findings could help identify which women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy were at greatest risk of hypertension at follow-up. We created a three-group ‘exposure’ variable for BP in pregnancy and each placental finding, i.e. group 1 normal BP (ref), group 2 moderately-elevated BP and (−) placental finding, and group 3 moderately-elevated BP and (+) placental finding. We used this exposure variable and in relation to the ‘outcome variable’, BP at follow-up, in the polytomous regression models

Results

Maternal characteristics at the time of enrollment in the original POUCH Study and at the follow-up POUCHmoms Study are described in Table 1 for our analytic sample; we provide absolute percentages and percentages weighted for the POUCH Study sampling scheme. We compared these characteristics among three groups (data not shown); 1) women in the current analyses (n=490); 2) women in the POUCHmoms follow-up study who were removed from these analyses because of incomplete placenta assessments, chronic hypertension, or incomplete pregnancy BP data (188); and 3) women eligible for the POUCHmoms Study but not followed-up (n=693). Groups one and two are similar on all variables listed in Table 1. Group three, those not followed, had lower levels of education and were more likely to be insured by Medicaid at entry to the POUCH Study. In addition, African-American women were less likely to be in the follow-up study (unweighted 35% of the current study, 47% of those not followed). Other variables, i.e. pre-pregnancy BMI, hypertension disorders of pregnancy and PTD were comparable across all three groups.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study sample during the POUCH Study and 7–15 years later at follow-up POUCHmoms Study


POUCH Study
At POUCHmoms Follow-up 7–15 yrs later
N % Weighted %* N % Weighted %*

Maternal Age (years)
 < 30 355 72 72 38 8 8
 30–39 134 27 28 277 56 54
 ≥ 40 1 0.2 0.04 175 36 38
Maternal Education (years)
 < 12 92 19 18 32 7 6
 = 12 124 25 24 66 13 12
 > 12 274 56 58 392 80 82
Maternal Race/Ethnicity
 White/Other 318 65 75
 African American 172 35 25
Medicaid Insurance
 No 251 51 56 317 65 69
 Yes 239 49 44 173 35 31
Pre-pregnancy BMI
 Underweight 26 5 4
 Normal 222 45 47
 Overweight 102 21 22
 Obese 140 29 27
Parity
 0 215 44 44 0 0 0
 1 31 6 4 44 9 8
 ≥2 244 50 52 446 91 92
Smoking during pregnancy
 Yes 137 28 28
 No 353 72 72
Preterm
 Yes 118 24 11
 No 372 76 89
Blood pressure during pregnancy
 Normal Blood Pressure 152 31 28
 Moderately-elevated blood pressure 298 61 65
 Gestational hypertension 25 5 4
 PE 15 3 3
Blood pressure at follow up
 Normal Blood Pressure 287 58 59
 Elevated Blood Pressure 21 4 5
 Stage I hypertension 96 20 20
 Stage II hypertension 86 18 16
*

Weighted for POUCH Study sampling protocol of cohort and subcohort; these percentages approximate prevalences in eligible population agreeing to participate in the POUCH Study

First, we examined placental pathology and BP in pregnancy. The prevalence of PE appeared higher in women with PE-associated placental pathology findings, i.e. mural hyperplasia, unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels, infarcts and decidual blood vessel atherosis, as compare to women without these placental findings. However, the small numbers of women with PE made estimates and comparisons imprecise (Table 2). Two of the PE-associated placental findings, mural hyperplasia and unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels, also were linked to a higher prevalence of moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy. Placental infarcts were positively associated with GH. By contrast, histologic chorioamnionitis did not raise the risk of elevated BP in pregnancy.

Table 2.

Placental/extraplacental membrane findings and maternal blood pressure in the POUCH Study pregnancy (n=490)

Normal Blood Pressure (n=152) Moderately-elevated Blood Pressure (n=298) Gestational Hypertension (n=25) Pre-eclampsia (n=15)
Placental/Extraplacental Membrane Findings N (percentage*) N (percentage*) N (percentage*) N (percentage*) N (percentage*)
Mural Hyperplasia
  No (0/7) 413 (84%) 139 (34%) 237 (57%) 25 (6%) 12 (3%)
  Yes (≥1/7) 77 (16%) 13 (17%) 61 (79%) p=.05# 0 3 (4%) p=0.36#
Unaltered/Abnormal Decidual Vessels
  None or one (0/7 or 1/7) 261 (53%) 91 (35%) 145 (56%) 19 (7%) 6 (2%)
  Two or more (≥2/7) 229 (47%) 61 (27%) 153 (67%) p=.08# 6 (2%) p=0.15# 9 (4%) p=0.32#
Atherosis
  No 464 (95%) 145 (31%) 282 (61%) 25 (5%) 12 (3%)
  Yes 26 (5%) 7 (27%) 16 (61%) p=0.79# 0 3 (12%) p=0.66#
Infarct
  None 324 (66%) 108 (33%) 200 (62%) p=0.32# 11 (3%) p<0.05# 5 (2%) p<0.05#
  Disc Margin only 108 (22%) 27 (25%) 64 (59%) 9 (9%) 8 (7%)
  Central Disc 58 (12%) 17 (29%) 34 (59%) 5 (9%) 2 (3%)
Histologic Chorioamnionitis
  No 437 (89%) 126 (29%) 272 (62%) 25 (100%) 14 (88%)
  Yes 53 (11%) 26 (49%) 26 (44%) p <0.05# 0 1 (2%) p=0.92#
*

Weighted for the sub-cohort sampling scheme.

**

Number of positive samples among the seven decidual samples examined per placenta.

#

Chi-square comparison with no placental abnormality and normal blood pressure as referents

Next, we assessed placental pathology and BP at follow-up after excluding women with PE and GH. The odds of Stage 2 hypertension 7–15 years after the POUCH Study pregnancy was elevated among women with placental evidence of mural hyperplasia during the POUCH Study, adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 2.7 (95% CI 1.1, 6.6) Table 3. In an unadjusted model, a twofold increased odds of Stage 2 hypertension at follow-up was observed among women with unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels, though in the adjusted model the confidence interval included one, aOR=1.7 (95% CI 0.8, 3.4). Placental infarcts, ‘atherosis’ and HCA were not associated with blood pressure at follow-up, however, the number of women with decidual blood vessel ‘atherosis’ was too small to adequately assess their risk.

Table 3.

Associations between placental/extraplacental membrane findings and maternal blood pressure at follow-up (7–15 years after POUCH Study pregnancy) among women with no hypertensive disorders during the POUCH Study pregnancy (N=450)

Blood Pressure at follow-up
Normal/Slightly Elevated (ref)
Stage 1 Hypertension
Stage 2 Hypertension
<130 Systolic BP and <80 Diastolic BP
130–139 Systolic BP and /or 80–89 Diastolic BP
≥ 140 Systolic BP and /or ≥ 90 Diastolic BP or currently taking medications
N (ref) N OR* aOR# N OR* aOR#

Placental/extraplacental Membrane Findings
Mural Hyperplasia
 No (0/7)** 253 71 1.0 1.0 52 1.0 1.0
 Yes (≥1/7)** 42 12 0.8 (0.4, 1.8) 0.8 (0.3, 2.0) 20 2.9 (1.4, 5.8) 2.7 (1.1, 6.6)
Unaltered/Abnormal Decidual Vessels
 None or one (0–1/7)** 167 42 1.0 1.0 27 1.0 1.0
 Two or more (≥2/7)** 128 41 1.1 (0.6, 1.9) 0.9 (0.5, 1.8) 45 2.1 (1.1, 3.9) 1.7 (0.8, 3.4)
Atherosis
 No 284 78 1.0 1.0 65 1.0 1.0
 Yes 11 5 1.0 (0.3, 3.3) 0.8 (0.2, 3.1) 7 1.9 (0.7, 5.6) 1.3 (0.4, 4.7)
Infarct
 None 200 55 1.0 1.0 53 1.0 1.0
 Disc Margin only 60 21 1.2 (0.6, 2.5) 1.4 (0.7, 2.8) 10 0.8 (0.3, 1.8) 0.9 (0.4, 2.4)
 Central Disc 35 7 0.8 (0.3, 2.1) 0.8 (0.3, 2.0) 9 1.0 (0.4, 2.4) 0.8 (0.3, 2.1)
Histologic Chorioamnionitis
 No 264 72 1.0 1.0 62 1.0 1.0
 Yes 31 11 0.9 (0.4, 2.2) 0.9 (0.3, 2.3) 10 1.3 (0.5, 3.2) 1.1 (0.5, 2.5)
*

Weighted for the POUCH Study sub-cohort sampling scheme.

**

Number of positive samples among the seven decidual samples examined per placenta.

#

Adjusted for maternal race, maternal age at enrollment, interval of follow-up, smoking before pregnancy, and pre-pregnancy BMI at POUCH Study.

A final set of analyses used findings in POUCH Study placentas to stratify women with moderately-elevated BP during the POUCH Study pregnancy. The focus was on two placental findings associated with follow-up hypertension in the previous analyses, i.e. mural hyperplasia or unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels. Odds of Stage 2 hypertension in the placenta pathology-stratified, moderately-elevated BP groups were compared to that of women with normal BP in pregnancy. Approximately one third of women with both moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy and placental mural hyperplasia went on to have Stage 2 hypertension at follow-up; aOR= 4.5 (95% CI 1.6, 12.5) (Table 4). A similar pattern was observed for women with both moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy and unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels, aOR=2.6 (95% CI 1.1, 5.9). Women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy but no mural hyperplasia or unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels were not at increased risk of Stage 2 hypertension at follow-up.

Table 4.

Associations between moderately-elevated blood pressure during pregnancy, stratified by placental/placental membrane findings, and maternal blood pressure at follow-up (7–15 years after POUCH Study pregnancy) among women with no hypertensive disorders during the POUCH Study pregnancy (N=450)

Blood Pressure (BP)at follow-up (n=450)
Normal/Slightly Elevated BP (ref)
Stage 1 Hypertension
Stage 2 Hypertension
<130 Systolic BP and <80 Diastolic BP
130–139 Systolic BP and /or 80–89 Diastolic BP
≥ 140 Systolic BP and /or ≥ 90 Diastolic BP or currently taking medications
N (ref) N OR* aOR# N OR* aOR#

Blood Pressure in pregnancy and placental/extraplacental membrane findings
Normal BP (ref) 106 30 1.0 1.0 16 1.0 1.0
Moderately-elevated BP/ − Mural hyperplasia (0/7) 155 46 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) 1.0 (0.5, 2.1) 36 1.5 (0.7, 3.2) 1.6 (0.7, 3.6)
Moderately-elevated BP/ + Mural hyperplasia (≥1/7) 34 7 0.6 (0.2, 1.9) 0.6 (0.2, 2.0) 20 5.1 (2.1, 12.4) 4.5 (1.6, 12.5)

Normal BP (ref) 106 30 1.0 1.0 16 1.0 1.0
Moderately-elevated BP/None or one (0–1/7) unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels 99 27 1.0 (0.5, 2.0) 1.0 (0.4, 2.2) 19 1.3 (0.6, 3.1) 1.6 (0.6, 4.1)
Moderately-elevated BP/Two or more (≥2/7) unaltered/abnormal decidual vessels 90 26 1.0 (0.5, 2.1) 0.9 (0.4, 2.0) 37 2.9 (1.3, 6.2) 2.6 (1.1, 5.9)
*

Weighted for the POUCH Study sub-cohort sampling scheme.

#

Adjusted for maternal race, maternal age at enrollment, interval of follow-up, smoking before pregnancy, and pre-pregnancy BMI at POUCH Study.

Discussion

Main Findings

We assessed BP and placental/extraplacental membrane findings among pregnant women who later were evaluated (7–15 years after the pregnancy) for CVD risk factors including hypertension. We observed that women who did not meet the definition of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy but whose placentas showed evidence of decidual vessel mural hyperplasia and/or unaltered/abnormal vessels were at increased risk of Stage 2 hypertension at follow-up. In addition, these same decidual vessel findings helped risk stratify women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy, i.e. those with mural hyperplasia and/or unaltered/abnormal vessels had a 2–5 fold increased odds of Stage 2 hypertension at follow-up while those without these vessel findings showed no significant elevated risk.

Strengths and limitations

There are several major strengths of this study. Participants were diverse in socioeconomic indicators and sampled from multiple prenatal clinics situated within multiple communities, thereby enhancing the generalizability of our findings. We looked at prevalence of ‘normal BP’ in pregnancy, hypertensive disorders (PE, GH), and an understudied group, i.e. women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy, in relation to placental pathology findings. The placental findings were identified through a rigorous, unbiased protocol (pathologist blinded to pregnancy outcome, clinical complications, gross placental examination data) applied equally to placentas from routine and complicated pregnancies. Many studies rely on placentas selected for examination at inner city, teaching hospitals and rarely are placentas analyzed without knowledge of clinical information. We showed specificity of the positive association between decidual vessel findings and later risk of hypertension by demonstrating no link with the placental complication HCA. Trained study professionals obtained BP measures at follow-up by using a standard protocol. Often women’s health from pregnancy to later life is studied with extant data and considerable variability in measures of BP documented later in life.

Limitations of our study include small sample sizes for some placental findings, e.g. ‘atherosis’. The study sample was not entirely comparable to the original POUCH Study sub-cohort, e.g. the latter had a larger proportion of African-American women. Race/ethnicity was a POUCH Study sampling strata, therefore sampling weights used in our analytic models provide some adjustment for this discrepancy. Still, we recognize that within a sampling stratum those followed-up may not be completely representative. It seems unlikely, however, that follow-up would be biased according to placental findings, and the proportions of women with PTD or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in our study sample (weighted 11% and 7% respectively), and in the remaining sub-cohort women (weighted 11% and 7% respectively) were the same. Women in the follow-up POUCHmoms Study were 25–58 years of age with a modest prevalence of hypertension consistent with this age range; our results may be most applicable to women who become hypertensive at these earlier ages. While the placentas/extraplacental membranes offered compelling information on women’s future health, clinically it may be challenging to identify these decidual vessel findings in large groups of deliveries, e.g. all women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy. Thus, our results also motivate future research to identify biomarkers that correlate with placental vessel findings and, along with other co-factors, can be used to predict later-life hypertension.

Interpretation

For decades studies repeatedly demonstrated that women with PE are more likely to develop CVD(4, 19) including hypertension(20) later in life. More recent reports extended this increased risk to include women with GH.(21, 22) As a result, clinicians are encouraged to query woman about their history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and manage these patients accordingly. Thus, pregnancy is unique in offering a window into future CVD risk before overt, persistent clinical signs begin.

The clinical convention of BP cutoffs to define hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is guided by risks to mother and fetus during pregnancy and not by mother’s future risk of hypertension. We have been interested in moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy because in non-pregnant populations future risk of CVD increases across the BP spectrum(23) and cutoffs for intervention have been shifting downward.(24) While many factors influence BP during pregnancy, our previous report of increased risk for later-life hypertension among women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy(10) motivated further consideration of this group. Here we showed that the addition of placental/extraplacental membrane findings associated with PE can help further risk-stratify women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy.

Among the few reports of placental findings and later maternal health, most include women with clinical complications such as PE(25) or preterm birth(25, 26) as added risk factors. One Swedish study reported a positive association between history of placental abruption and higher maternal BP at age 40.( 27) Another study observed a link between delivery of an SGA infant (a possible proxy for placental vascular pathology) and maternal endothelial dysfunction six months after delivery, even in the absence of PE.(28) Among women in our study with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy and evidence of placental vascular pathology (mural hyperplasia and/or unaltered/abnormal vessels in the decidua) who went on to have hypertension at follow-up, most (two-thirds) had neither a preterm birth or an SGA infant during the POUCH Study pregnancy.

In POUCH Study placentas, mural hyperplasia in decidual vessels occurred less frequently than unaltered/abnormal vessels, and these two findings were strongly correlated, i.e. 94% of placentas with mural hyperplasia in decidual vessels showed evidence of unaltered/abnormal vessels while 31% of women with at least two of seven decidual samples showing unaltered/abnormal vessels had evidence of mural hyperplasia. Mural hyperplasia may represent an extreme of unaltered/abnormal vessels, with inability of the trophoblasts to remodel vessel walls and atypical vessel response to pregnancy. Of note, about 18% of POUCH Study women with PE in our initial analysis showed evidence of mural hyperplasia in decidual vessels and 52% showed unaltered/abnormal vessels in two more decidual vessel samples. While we excluded 22 POUCH Study sub-cohort women with chronic hypertension (CH) from this analysis, a look back at their placental findings indicate their prevalence of mural hyperplasia in decidual vessels (8%) was similar to that of women with normal BP in pregnancy. Their prevalence of unaltered/abnormal vessels was high (54%) and similar to that of women with PE, but the small number of women with CH and placental data preclude any strong inferences. Interestingly, while placental infarcts were more common in women with GH and PE, they were not associated with hypertension 7–15 years post-delivery.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest the ‘window of pregnancy’ contains clues, beyond the obvious complications of PE, GH, PTD, or SGA, to mothers’ future vascular health. Maternal vessel placental/extraplacental membrane findings typically associated with PE help risk stratify women with moderately-elevated BP in pregnancy who are at greater risk of later-life hypertension.

Supplementary Material

Supp fig 1

Figure S1: Current study sample: from the POUCH Study (parent cohort) and maternal follow-up 7-15 years later in the POUCHmoms Study

Supp fig 2

Figure S2: Representative placental/extra-placental membrane findings from POUCH Study participants. (A) Unaltered maternal decidual vessel; (B) Abnormal maternal decidual vessel; (C) Mural hyperplasia; (D) Mural hyperplasia; (E) Fibrinoid necrosis/atherosis

Supp Doc-1
Supp Doc-2
Supp Doc-4
Supp Doc-5
Supp Doc-3
Supp Doc-6
Supp Doc-7
Supp Doc-8
Supp Doc-9

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge participants in the POUCH study and follow-up Pouchmoms Study. We thank them for their time and commitment to improving knowledge about pregnancy health and women’s health.

Funding

Perinatal Epidemiological Research Initiative Program Grant from the March of Dimes Foundation (20FY01-38 and 20FY04-37); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD34543; T32HD046377) and the National Institute of Nursing Research (R01-HD34543); the Thrasher Research Foundation (02816-7); the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01-DP000143-01); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL103825)..

Funding

The POUCH Study was supported by the Perinatal Epidemiological Research Initiative Program Grant from the March of Dimes Foundation (20FY01-38 and 20FY04-37), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Nursing Research (R01-HD34543), the Thrasher Research Foundation (02816-7) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01-DP000143-01). The POUCHmoms Study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL103825).

Footnotes

Disclosure of Interests

None declared. Completed disclosure of interest forms are available to view online as supporting information.

Details of Ethics Approval

The POUCH Study has maintained continuous approval by the institutional review boards at Michigan State University (IRB# 95-590) since January, 1996, and at the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (IRB# 44-LHAS) since February, 1998. The POUCHmoms Study has also maintained continuous approval by the institutional review boards at Michigan State University (IRB# 10-161) since January, 2011, and at the University of Pittsburgh (IRB# REN15070264) since December, 2011.

Contributor Information

Claudia B. Holzman, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA

Patricia Senagore, Emeritus, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA.

Jia Xu, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN USA.

Galit L. Dunietz, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USA

Kelly L. Strutz, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA

Yan Tian, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, MI, USA.

Bertha L. Bullen, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA

Megan Eagle, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USA.

Janet M. Catov, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA USA..

References

  • 1.Cheng S, Claggett B, Correia AW, Shah AM, Gupta DK, Skali H, et al. Temporal trends in the population attributable risk for cardiovascular disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Circulation. 2014;130(10):820–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ji H, Kim A, Ebinger JE, Niiranen TJ, Claggett BL, Bairey Merz CN, et al. Sex Differences in Blood Pressure Trajectories Over the Life Course. JAMA Cardiol. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Behrens I, Basit S, Melbye M, Lykke JA, Wohlfahrt J, Bundgaard H, et al. Risk of post-pregnancy hypertension in women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2017;358:j3078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brown MC, Best KE, Pearce MS, Waugh J, Robson SC, Bell R. Cardiovascular disease risk in women with pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(1):1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garovic VD, Bailey KR, Boerwinkle E, Hunt SC, Weder AB, Curb D, et al. Hypertension in pregnancy as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease later in life. J Hypertens. 2010;28(4):826–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rich-Edwards JW, Fraser A, Lawlor DA, Catov JM. Pregnancy characteristics and women’s future cardiovascular health: an underused opportunity to improve women’s health? Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36:57–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Romundstad PR, Magnussen EB, Smith GD, Vatten LJ. Hypertension in pregnancy and later cardiovascular risk: common antecedents? Circulation. 2010;122(6):579–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Staff AC, Dechend R, Pijnenborg R. Learning from the placenta: acute atherosis and vascular remodeling in preeclampsia-novel aspects for atherosclerosis and future cardiovascular health. Hypertension. 2010;56(6):1026–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202 Summary: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):211–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dunietz GL, Strutz KL, Holzman C, Tian Y, Todem D, Bullen BL, et al. Moderately elevated blood pressure during pregnancy and odds of hypertension later in life: the POUCHmoms longitudinal study. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1606–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holzman C, Bullen B, Fisher R, Paneth N, Reuss L, Prematurity Study G. Pregnancy outcomes and community health: the POUCH study of preterm delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15 Suppl 2:136–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Holzman C, Lin X, Senagore P, Chung H. Histologic chorioamnionitis and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(7):786–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(1):S1–S22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mijal RS, Holzman CB, Rana S, Karumanchi SA, Wang J, Sikorskii A. Midpregnancy levels of angiogenic markers in relation to maternal characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(3):244 e1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kelly R, Holzman C, Senagore P, Wang J, Tian Y, Rahbar MH, et al. Placental vascular pathology findings and pathways to preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(2):148–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Benirschke KK P; Baergen RN. Legal Considerations. Pathology of the Human Placenta. Fifth ed. New York, New York: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.; 2006. p. 1050. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Redline R Disorders of the Placental Parenchyma. In: Lewis SP, E, editor. Pathology of the Placenta. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 411. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr., et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, Babu A, Kotronias RA, Rushton C, et al. Preeclampsia and Future Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(2). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Groenhof TKJ, van Rijn BB, Franx A, Roeters van Lennep JE, Bots ML, Lely AT. Preventing cardiovascular disease after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Searching for the how and when. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(16):1735–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haug EB, Horn J, Markovitz AR, Fraser A, Vatten LJ, Macdonald-Wallis C, et al. Life Course Trajectories of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women With and Without Hypertensive Disorders in First Pregnancy: The HUNT Study in Norway. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(15):e009250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sia WW, Pertman SM, Yan RM, Tsuyuki RT. Are Preeclampsia and Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease? A Case-Control Study of Women With Heart Disease. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(12):1760–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yano Y, Reis JP, Colangelo LA, Shimbo D, Viera AJ, Allen NB, et al. Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Young Adults Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline With Cardiovascular Events Later in Life. JAMA. 2018;320(17):1774–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr., Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017. ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1269–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cain MA, Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Kirby RS, Salihu HM, Louis JM. Pregnancy as a window to future health: maternal placental syndromes and short-term cardiovascular outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(4):484 e1–e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Catov JM, Muldoon MF, Reis SE, Ness RB, Nguyen LN, Yamal JM, et al. Preterm birth with placental evidence of malperfusion is associated with cardiovascular risk factors after pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2018;125(8):1009–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Parikh NI, Norberg M, Ingelsson E, Cnattingius S, Vasan RS, Domellof M, et al. Association of Pregnancy Complications and Characteristics With Future Risk of Elevated Blood Pressure: The Vasterbotten Intervention Program. Hypertension. 2017;69(3):475–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hillman SL, Kubba T, Williams DJ. Delivery of small-for-gestational-age neonate and association with early-onset impaired maternal endothelial function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(1):150–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp fig 1

Figure S1: Current study sample: from the POUCH Study (parent cohort) and maternal follow-up 7-15 years later in the POUCHmoms Study

Supp fig 2

Figure S2: Representative placental/extra-placental membrane findings from POUCH Study participants. (A) Unaltered maternal decidual vessel; (B) Abnormal maternal decidual vessel; (C) Mural hyperplasia; (D) Mural hyperplasia; (E) Fibrinoid necrosis/atherosis

Supp Doc-1
Supp Doc-2
Supp Doc-4
Supp Doc-5
Supp Doc-3
Supp Doc-6
Supp Doc-7
Supp Doc-8
Supp Doc-9

RESOURCES