Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Jun 6;18(6):e0286855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286855

Temperature effects on the calculation of the functional derivative of Tc with respect to α2F(ω)

JA Camargo-Martínez 1,#, F Mesa 2,*,#, GI González-Pedreros 3,#
Editor: Boris Malomed4
PMCID: PMC10243620  PMID: 37279201

Abstract

The functional derivative of the superconducting transition temperature Tc with respect to the electron-phonon coupling function α2F(ω),δTc2/δα2F(ω) permits identifying the frequency regions where phonons are most effective in raising Tc. This work presents an analysis of temperature effects on the calculation of the δTc/δα2F(ω) and μ* parameters. The results may permit establishing that the variation of the temperature in the δTc/δα2F(ω) and μ* parameter allows establishing patterns and conditions that are possibly related to the physical conditions in the superconducting state, with implications on the theoretical estimation of the Tc.

Introduction

Superconductivity is the complete loss of electrical resistivity of a material that occurs only below a certain temperature, called superconducting critical temperature Tc. It is a state of matter with technologically impactful applications but with serious difficulties of use on a large scale due to the extreme conditions in which it occurs: low temperatures or high pressures. However, its application on a small scale is a current fact.

Research on the subject from a theoretical approach seeks to establish its fundamental physical mechanisms, the understanding of which will positively lead to the engineering of superconducting materials with a view to their application on a large scale. The best approach, recognized with the Nobel Prize in physics in 1971, is the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory, which states that superconductivity is the “physics of Cooper pairs” [1].

Here, the effective attraction between electrons forming the Cooper pair is generated by the interaction between the electrons and the lattice vibrations (phonons), called the electron-phonon interaction. This scheme explains the phenomenon for weak electron-phonon coupling systems, leading to Tc below 70 K, (lower than the temperature of liquid nitrogen). Thus, the next step was to generalize the BCS theory to superconductors, in which the electron-phonon interaction is strong and hence has a higher Tc This was the work of G. M. Eliashberg [2] who in his theoretical description, introduced the electron-phonon interaction and the electronic and phononic band structure more precisely. All that information is gathered in a function, the Eliashberg spectral function, or electron-phonon coupling function α2F(ω) (see Fig 1), which can be obtained both theoretically (DFT calculations) and experimentally (tunneling experiment). The Eliashberg spectral function is obtained from the calculated phonon spectrum and the calculated electron–phonon matrix elements [3, 4]. The Coulombic repulsion between electrons is included through a parameter μ.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Schematics of (a) the Eliashberg spectral function α2F(ω) and (b) the functional derivative of the superconducting critical temperature Tc concerning the α2F(ω) function, ΔTc/δα2F(ω).

On the other hand, the linearization of the Eliashberg equations makes it possible to determine the functional derivative of the superconducting critical temperature Tc concerning the function α2F(ω), δFc/δα2F(ω). The first numerical calculations of the δFc/δα2F(ω) in superconductors were performed by Bergmann and Rainer [5]. Their results showed that this function has a universal form (see Fig 1b): it grows from ω = 0 to a maximum at ω ∼ 7KBTc and then slowly decreases to 0 as ω → ∞ [5, 6]. From δTc/δα2F(ω), it is possible to determine the phonon frequency leading to the highest possible Tc in a superconductor [7] and to describe the change in Tc, ΔTc, given a slight variation in the α2F(ω) function, Δα2F(ω), generated by the action of physical conditions such as pressure, doping, etc. [810], thus (Eq (1);

ΔT=0+ΔTcδα2F(ω)Δα2F(ω)dω (1)

A previous theoretical study showed that there is a correlation between the frequencies of the maxima of the δTcδα2F(ω) and α2F(ω) functions [11, 12], where the convergence of these frequencies occurs at the optimal electron-phonon interaction conditions leading to the superconductor reaching the maximum possible Tc(TcMax) [1317]. This convergence frequency is called the optimum frequency ωopt, which satisfies the relation ωopt=7KBTcMax, where KB is the Boltzmann constant. The calculation of the δTc/δα2F(ω) requires the experimental (or test) Tc value for the prior determination of the parameter μ*, which physically accounts for the Coulombic repulsion between electrons in the system under study. The parameter μ* is determined from the fit to the linearized Eliashberg equations (see Materials and methods section- Eq (3) when the pair breakdown parameter ρ tends to zero (ρ → 0), which is valid for T = Tc [15].

Up until now, the physical interpretation and application of the δTc/δα2F(ω) have failed to consolidate. In 2015 Nicol and Carbotte used the δTc/δα2F(ω) to demonstrate that the α2F(ω) spectral function of sulfur trihydride H3S at 200 GPa is highly optimized for Tc [18]. González-Pedreros and Baquero [10] and Camargo-Martínez et al. [19] used the δTc/δα2F(ω) to determine the trend of Tc as a function of pressure in Nb-bcc (Cubic Niobium) and H3S respectively, taking the reported experimental Tc as a starting point. In other work, the δTc/δα2F(ω) was determined to identify possible frequency regions where phonons would be the most effective in increasing Tc [20, 21]. All these results are descriptive and not predictive in nature.

One of the possible contributions of theoretical physics in superconductivity is to clearly establish the fundamental physical foundations of the superconducting phenomenon in order to suggest with certainty, the line of experimental process to obtain superconductivity at room temperature in viable conditions for its application to large-scale. An example of the predictive effect of the theoretical approach on superconductivity was observed in the idea proposed by Ashcroft [22], who stated that hydrogen-rich systems would be viable candidates to be high critical temperature superconductors. This proposal gave rise to experimentation in this field with the discovery of new high-Tc superconductors, as H3S (Tc of 203 K at 155 GPa [23]) or LaH10 (Tc of 260 K at 180 GPa [24]), called hydride superconductors. This discovery gave a new impetus to this field of study, which had been stuck with the superconducting cuprates (Tc of 164 K) since 1994 [25]. The current difficulty with hydride superconductors is in their high-pressure conditions of formation. In this sense, evaluating possible new ways to predict Tc values in terms of well-defined physical conditions (such as pressure, doping, etc.) is an interesting line of work. Here, the study of the functional derivative δTc/δα2F(ω) seeks to establish the possible existence of patterns that lead to the determination of an optimum temperature of the system (superconducting critical temperature), which would also avoid the use of test or experimental Tc in first-principles calculations.

From a purely computational point of view, the temperature value can have pivotal implications in the calculation, result, and interpretation of the functional derivative δTc/δα2F(ω). For this reason, in this manuscript, we present the analysis of the effects of temperature variation, around experimental Tc value, on the calculation of the functional derivative δTc/δα2F(ω), in the superconductor H3S, of which a Tc of 203 K at 155 GPa was measured [23].

Materials and methods

This study was developed based on the Eliashberg α2F(ω) spectral functions of H3S obtained in previous work [12, 19], whose calculations were performed in the range of pressures (155–225 GPa), where the experimental Tc were reported [23]. Here, the functional derivatives were obtained with the procedure widely used by Carbotte et al. [1316, 18, 26, 27] which is based on the work of G. Bergmann and D. Rainer [5]. The determination of the functional derivative (see Eq (2)) of the superconducting critical temperature Tc with respect α2F(ω) function, δTc/δα2F(ω), was performed from the relation:

δTcδα2F(ω)=δρδα2F(ω)(ρT)Tc (2)

Where ρ was expressed in terms of Knm for T = Tc, which is obtained as a (kernel) solution of the linearized Eliashberg equations on the imaginary axis [5, 6]:

ρΔ¯n=πTm(λnm-μ*-δnm|ω˜|πT)Δ¯m (3)

with ω~=iωn+πTmλnmsgn(ωn), ωn = πT(2n − 1) the n-th Matsubara frequency and Δn=Δn~ρ+|ωn~|. For more details on the mathematical formulation, see the reference [17]. To evaluate the effects of the Tc parameter on the δTc/δα2F(ω) calculations, 10 K variations in temperature around the experimental value (reference temperature) were developed for each of the pressures evaluated (155 GPa,175 GPa, 195 GPa, and 215 GPa).

Results and discussion

The δTc/δα2F(ω) as a function of frequency calculated for H3S at different pressures and temperatures are presented in Fig 2.

Fig 2. δTc/δα2F(ω) as a function of frequency ω for H3S calculated at different temperatures at pressures of a) 155GPa, b) 175 GPa, c) 195 GPa, and d) 215 GPa.

Fig 2

Stars show critical temperature related to corresponding pressure, horizontal arrows indicate frequency shift of the maximum value of the δTc/δα2F(ω), ωδMAX, red arrows present how δTc/δα2F(ω)-curve increases their separation, and vertical arrows point average frequency of intersection of the δTc/δα2F(ω).

Each case evaluated (Fig 2), frequency values in every δTc/δαT2F(ω)-maximum are displaced, δMAX, as temperature is increased in accord with relation ωoptkBTc [5]. The δTc/δα2F(ω)-maximum allows identifying of the frequency regions ωopt where phonons are more effective in increasing Tc [28]; this is why it is so important to evaluate their behavior.

To every pressure (Fig 2a–2d), in a temperature interval ΔT = 40K about Tc, δTc/δα2F(ω) intersects a narrow frequency range (it looks point-like) is verified. Condition of small variation of the δTc/δα2F(ω) due to temperature effects, below the intersection point, is observed for the system under the lowest compression (155 GPa) and vice versa. This behavior is opposite if the δTc/δα2F(ω) are compared at frequencies higher than the intersection point. In both cases, the effect of temperature on the calculation of the δTc/δα2F(ω) could establish patterns (intersection point, variation, or separation between the δTc/δα2F(ω) and their maxima) that would lead to the determination of optimal physical conditions of the superconducting state and the possible estimation of the Tc.

Now, the intensities (value on the vertical axis) of the δTc/δα2F(ω)-maximums show two different behaviors (Fig 2). At 155 GPa, such intensities slightly increase their value as the temperature increases, as a consequence of the little separation induced in the δTc/δα2F(ω). However, for the other pressures (175, 195, and 215 GPa), the behavior of the δTc/δα2F(ω) intensities is opposite to the 155 GPa case, starting from a higher intensity and decreasing with increasing temperature, being more evident with increasing pressure. It is important to note that there seems to be no relationship between the variation of the frequency of the maximum of the δTc/δα2F(ω),ωδMAX, and the intensity of the maximum of the δTc/δα2F(ω).

The patterns of the δTc/δα2F(ω) vs Tc in the H3S reveal that these seem to have a characteristic behavior at a specific pressure (155 GPa).

(Fig 3) shows the linearity of the frequency of the maximum of the δTc/δα2F(ω)(ωδMAX) as a function of temperature for all pressures. Such lines are collinear with mean slope m=+0.64 meV/K. This means that the ωδMAX moves uniformly toward higher frequencies as the temperature increases. On the other hand, ωδMAX is almost unaffected by the pressure (p) since a considerable change of Δp = 40 GPa induces a small ΔωδMAX=2.5 meV. However, each pressure has a limit of ωδMAX, whose maximum value is reached at 155 GPa, leading to a higher Tc.

Fig 3. Frequency of the maximum of the δTc/δα2F(ω),ωδMAX, as a function of temperature, at different pressures.

Fig 3

The dashed boxes (yellow) show the slight change in ωδMAX induced by pressure.

In the calculation of the δTc/δα2F(ω), the temperature variation involves the determination of the μ* parameter of Fig 3. The comparison between the parameters μ* adjusted at different temperatures for each of the pressures is presented in Fig 4.

Fig 4. The parameter μ* as a function of temperature T for H3S at different pressures.

Fig 4

The horizontal band (yellow) marks the Δμ* within which the μ* fitted to the experimental Tc are set, indicated by the diagonal band (purple).

It is observed in Fig 4 that μ* vs T has a comparable trend between pressures. This could be assumed to be quasi-linear in a first approximation. However, this quasi-linearity is much more evident at higher pressure. The results show that a ΔTc = 40K induces a Δμ*¯=0.25. However, the μ* values fitted to the experimental Tc in the pressure range from 155 to 215 GPa are in the Δμ* range of 0.209–0.285, which implies a ΔTc¯=18.1 K, a small range with respect to the 203 K of the experimental maximum Tc of H3S. This result is interesting because it would allow establishing an initial criterion of theoretical estimation of the Tc around a small range of temperatures, according to the Δμ*. It is then necessary to determine, with this procedure, the Δμ* other systems to evaluate if this presents a universal range or if it varies significantly from one system to another.

In the calculation of the δTc/δα2F(ω), it was found that for temperatures distant between -60 K and +30 K with respect to the experimental Tc, μ* values of 0,8 and 0,09 are generated, which are outside the values typically used or calculated (between 0,3 and 0,1), and their δTc/δα2F(ω) presented computational difficulties in their calculation, with behaviors different in form from those observed in the δTc/δα2F(ω) calculated at temperatures close to the experimental Tc.

Conclusions

This paper presents the preliminary theoretical analysis of the effects of temperature variation around the experimental superconducting critical temperature Tc on the calculation of the functional derivative δTc/δα2F(ω) for superconducting H3S in the pressure range from 155 to 215 GPa. These calculations included the determination of the μ* parameters through fitting Tc in the linearized Eliashberg equations. The calculated δTc/δα2F(ω) revealed temperature- and pressure-induced displacement, intersection, and separation patterns that could be associated with the physical conditions in the superconducting state and the estimation of Tc. The μ* values obtained allowed the determination of a range of values leading to temperatures that could establish an initial criterion for possible theoretical estimation of Tc. This procedure must be evaluated and confirmed in other similar systems to establish the possible generalization of the results presented here.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

F. Mesa was financed by the Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Bardeen J, Cooper LN, Schrieffer JR. Theory of Superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 1957;108:1175–1204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Eliashberg GM. Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor. Sov. Phys.—JETP (Engl Transl). 1960;11:3. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Allen PB, Dynes RC. Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed. Phys. Rev. B 1975;12:905. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.905 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Karaca E, Arslan E, Tütüncü HM, Srivastava GP. Physical properties of the body-centred tetragonal CaPd2Ge2. Philosophical Magazine 2017;97(22):1866. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2017.1320439 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bergmann G, Rainer D. The sensitivity of the transition temperature to changes in α2 F(ω). Z Physik. 1973;263:59–68. doi: 10.1007/BF02351862 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rainer D, Bergmann G. Temperature dependence of Hc2 and κ1 in strong coupling superconductors. J Low Temp Phys. 1974;14:501–519. doi: 10.1007/BF00658876 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Baquero R, Gutiérrez-Ibarra J, Meza L, Navarro O, Kihlstrom KE. Eliashberg theory and high-Tc superconductivity. Revista Mexicana de Física 1989;35(3):161–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Baquero R, López-Olazagasti E. Superconducting lanthanum under pressure. Phys. Rev. B. 1984;30:5019. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mitrović B. A new method for calculating the functional derivative δTc/δα2 F(Ω): Application to MgB2. Int. J Mod. Phys. C. 2002;13:1087–1093. doi: 10.1142/S012918310200384X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. González-Pedreros GI, Baquero R. Superconducting critical temperature under pressure. Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications. 2018;548:132–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. González-Pedreros GI, Camargo-Martínez JA, Mesa F. Cooper Pairs Distribution function for bcc Niobium under pressure from first-principles. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87028-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. González-Pedreros GI, Camargo-Martínez JA, Mesa F. Cooper-pair distribution function Dcp(ω, Tc) for superconducting D3S and H3S. Sci Rep. 2021;11:22618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02081-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Daams MJ. Anisotropic Superconductors and Elastic Impurity Scattering. Ph.D. thesis. Mc-Master University, Hamilton, Ont. 1977. Available: https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/handle/11375/12642
  • 14. Daams JM, Carbotte JP, Baquero R. Critical field and specific heat of superconducting Tl-Pb-Bi alloys. J Low Temp Phys. 1979;35:547–559. doi: 10.1007/BF00117895 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Daams JM, Carbotte JP. Thermodynamics of superconducting Nb3Sn. Solid State Communications. 1979;29:501–505. doi: 10.1016/0038-1098(79)90794-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Daams JM, Carbotte JP. Thermodynamics of strong coupling superconductors including the effect of anisotropy. J Low Temp Phys. 1981;43:263–286. doi: 10.1007/BF00116155 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Camargo-Martínez JA, González-Pedreros GI, Mesa F. The higher superconducting transition temperature Tc and the functional derivative of Tc with α2 F(ω) for electron–phonon superconductors. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2020;32:505901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nicol EJ, Carbotte JP. Comparison of pressurized sulfur hydride with conventional superconductors. Phys Rev. B. 2015;91:220507. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.220507 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Camargo-Martínez J.A., González-Pedreros G.I., Baquero R. High-Tc superconductivity in H3S: pressure effects on the superconducting critical temperature and Cooper pair distribution function. Supercond Sci Technol. 2019;32:125013. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tanaka K, Tse JS, Liu H. Electron-phonon coupling mechanisms for hydrogen-rich metals at high pressure. Phys Rev B. 2017;96:100502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.100502 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yao Y, Tse JS, Tanaka K, Marsiglio F, Ma Y. Superconductivity in lithium under high pressure investigated with density functional and Eliashberg theory. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:054524. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.054524 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ashcroft N.W. Hydrogen Dominant Metallic Alloys: High Temperature Superconductors? Rev. Lett. 92, 187002 (2004). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Drozdov AP, Eremets MI, Troyan IA, Ksenofontov V, Shylin SI. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature. 2015;525:73–76. doi: 10.1038/nature14964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Somayazulu M, Ahart M, Ajay KM, Geballe ZM, Baldini M, Meng Y, et al. Evidence for Superconductivity above 260 K in Lanthanum Superhydride at Megabar Pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:027001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.027001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gao L, Xue YY, Chen F, Xiong Q, Meng RL, Ramirez D, et al. Superconductivity up to 164 K in HgBa2Cam−1CumO2m+2+δ (m = 1, 2, and 3) under quasihydrostatic pressures. Phys. Rev. B 1994;50:4260(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.4260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Daams J.M., Carbotte J.P. Functional derivatives for the critical magnetic field of Pb. Can. J. Phys. 56 (1978) 1248. doi: 10.1139/p78-165 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Daams J., Carbotte J.P. Thermodynamic properties of superconducting niobium J. Low Temp. Phys. 40 (1980) 135. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mitrović B, Carbotte JP. Tunneling in a superconductor with an energy dependent electronic density of states. Solid State Communications. 1981;40:249–252. doi: 10.1016/0038-1098(81)90751-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Boris Malomed

8 May 2023

PONE-D-23-09741Temperature effects on the calculation of the functional derivative of Tc with respect to α2F(ω)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mesa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 22 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Boris Malomed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please update your submission to use the PLOS LaTeX template. The template and more information on our requirements for LaTeX submissions can be found at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/latex

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. I cannot agree with the sentence: "The function α2F(ω) is obtained from the solution of the Eliashberg equations" (page 3, line 62).

It is generally known that the function α2F(ω) is an input parameter (together with the Coulomb pseudopotential) to the Eliashberg equations.

Eliashberg spectral function can be obtained theoretically (DFT calculations) or experimentally (tunneling experiment).

2. Paper is very interesting but more technical information is needed. Did Authors use their codes and are they widely available?

It would be great to can verify their correct operation.

3. It is possible to calculate the functional derivative of Tc on the base of the Allen-Dynes equation? Tc calculated using the Allen-Dynes equation depends on the a2F function.

After addressing this topics, I would recommend this paper for publication in PLOS ONE

Reviewer #2: The paper discusses the behavior of δTc/δα2 F(ω) as a function of frequency calculated for H3S at different pressures and temperatures. The authors present their findings in Figs. 2-4 and discuss the implications of their results.

Overall, the paper is well-written and the results are presented clearly. The figures are of good quality and support the conclusions drawn by the authors. However, some points should be addressed:

It would be helpful to provide more context about the significance of the results for non-experts in the field. While the authors briefly mention the importance of the behavior of δTc/δα2 F(ω) for determining optimal physical conditions of the superconducting state and estimating Tc, more information could be provided about why this is important and how it relates to current research in the field.

The authors mention in the abstract that their findings support the hypothesis that H3S under 155 GPa pressure achieves the highest experimental Tc. However, this is not discussed in detail in the main text. It would be helpful to explain how the results in Figs. 2-4 support this hypothesis, and to relate this to the broader literature on high-temperature superconductivity.

The authors mention that μ* shows an almost linear correlation with temperature in Fig. 4, but it is unclear from the figure whether this is true for all pressures or only for certain ones. It would be helpful to clarify this point in the caption or main text

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 6;18(6):e0286855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286855.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


23 May 2023

Bogotá - Colombia, 18 de May 2023

PLOS ONE

Editorial Board

Dear Sirs,

The authors wish to acknowledge all the suggestions and comments given to this work by the reviewers. The ideas proposed by reviewers are very interesting and consistent with our work. The corrections made considerably improved the manuscript.

We present point-by-point responses to the comments from reviewers:

For Reviewer 1:

(1) I cannot agree with the sentence: "The function α2F(ω) is obtained from the solution of the Eliashberg equations" (page 3, line 62). It is generally known that the function α2F(ω) is an input parameter (together with the Coulomb pseudopotential) to the Eliashberg equations. Eliashberg spectral function can be obtained theoretically (DFT calculations) or experimentally (tunneling experiment).

Answer: We recognize the error in the mentioned sentence. So, the last part of the paragraph that contains the mentioned sentence was adjusted as follows:

“All that information is gathered in a function, the Eliashberg spectral function, or electron-phonon coupling function α2F(ω) (see Fig.1a), which can be obtained both theoretically (DFT calculations) and experimentally (tunneling experiment). The Eliashberg spectral function is obtained from the calculated phonon spectrum and the calculated electron–phonon matrix elements [cites]. The Coulombic repulsion between electrons was included through a parameter μ”

As can be seen in the manuscript:

(2) Paper is very interesting but more technical information is needed. Did Authors use their codes and are they widely available? It would be great to can verify their correct operation.

Answer: This work is based on a2F(w) calculations obtained by us in previous works, which were developed using Quantum ESPRESSO code. The functional derivatives were determined with the procedure widely used by Carbotte et al., which is based on the work of G. Bergmann and D. Rainer.

So, the Materials and Methods section was adjusted with the following clarification:

Here, the functional derivatives were obtained with the procedure widely used by Carbotte et al. [cites] which is based on the work of G. Bergmann and D. Rainer [cite].

As can be seen in the manuscript:

(3) It is possible to calculate the functional derivative of Tc on the base of the Allen-Dynes equation? Tc calculated using the Allen-Dynes equation depends on the a2F function.

Answer: The critical temperature formula proposed by Allen-Dynes could be understood as a result of the adjustment of the Eliashberg model with a tendency to the BCS limit. The Allen-Dynes equation depends indirectly on the function α2F(ω) through the electron-phonon coupling parameter (λ). This implies the possibly that δTc/δα2F(ω) could be obtained from it. We infer that this possible procedure would not achieve the generality of the one proposed by G. Bergmann and D. Rainer, since the Allen-Dynes equation contains physical considerations (phonon contributions simplified) that limit its scope. So, obtaining the functional derivative of Tc from Allen-Dynes equation would leave the phonon-detailed contribution incomplete.

In a recent work1 an improved analytical correction to the Allen-Dynes equation (which eliminates the systematic underprediction of Tc at higher temperatures) was reported, through a symbolic regression to a curated dataset of α2F(ω) spectral functions. Possibly through this new formulation of Tc formula a δTc/δα2F(ω) could be obtained, with relatively consistent results.

1https://www.nature.com/articles/s41524-021-00666-7

This subject is interesting, but we think that it must be analyzed in greater detail before making any proposal. For this reason, this idea will not be included in this manuscript.

For Reviewer 2:

(1) It would be helpful to provide more context about the significance of the results for non-experts in the field. While the authors briefly mention the importance of the behavior of δTc/δα2 F(ω) for determining optimal physical conditions of the superconducting state and estimating Tc, more information could be provided about why this is important and how it relates to current research in the field.

Answer: The following contextualization paragraph is included in the manuscript (introduction section)

“One of the possible contributions of theoretical physics in superconductivity is to clearly establish the fundamental physical foundations of the superconducting phenomenon in order to suggest with certainty, the line of experimental process to obtain superconductivity at room temperature in viable conditions for its application to large-scale. An example of the predictive effect of the theoretical approach on superconductivity was observed in the idea proposed by Ashcroft (cita), who stated that hydrogen-rich systems would be viable candidates to be high critical temperature (Tc) superconductors. This proposal gave rise to experimentation in this field with the discovery of new high-Tc superconductors, as H3S (Tc of 203 K at 155 GPa) or LaH10 (Tc of 260 K at 180 GPa), called hydride superconductors. This discovery gave a new impetus to this field of study, which had been stuck with the superconducting cuprates (Tc of 150 K) since 1995. The current difficulty with the hydride superconductors is in their high-pressure conditions of formation.

In this sense, evaluating possible new ways to predict Tc values in terms of well-defined physical conditions (such as pressure, doping, etc.) is an interesting line of work. Here, the study of the derivative seeks to establish the possible existence of patterns that lead to the determination of an optimum temperature of the system (superconducting critical temperature), which would also avoid the use of test or experimental Tc in first-principles calculations.”

As can be seen in the manuscript:

(2) The authors mention in the abstract that their findings support the hypothesis that H3S under 155 GPa pressure achieves the highest experimental Tc. However, this is not discussed in detail in the main text. It would be helpful to explain how the results in Figs. 2-4 support this hypothesis, and to relate this to the broader literature on high-temperature superconductivity.

Answer: The authors clarify that no mention was made in the abstract of the submitted manuscript that our results support “the hypothesis that H3S under 155 GPa pressure achieves the highest experimental Tc”. However, in the main text, the following affirmation was made: “These patterns seem to point to the system under 155 GPa pressure as the distinctive or particular condition of H3S, which is consistent with the fact that at this pressure, H3S achieves the highest experimental Tc”. We do not have the necessary results that allow us to support with certainty the validity of said assumption, remaining only as a coincidence. For this reason, the wording is adjusted to avoid any misinterpretation, remaining as follows:

The patterns of the derivative vs. Tc in the H3S reveal that these seem to have a characteristic behavior at a specific pressure (155 GPa).

As can be seen in the manuscript:

(3) The authors mention that μ* shows an almost linear correlation with temperature in Fig. 4, but it is unclear from the figure whether this is true for all pressures or only for certain ones. It would be helpful to clarify this point in the caption or main text.

Answer: The wording of the sentence was improved to make the idea clearer.

It is observed in Fig.4 that μ* vs T has a comparable trend between pressures. This could be assumed to be quasi-linear in a first approximation. However, this quasi-linearity is much more evident at higher pressure.

As can be seen in the manuscript:

The final version of the manuscript is attached (LaTeX format), in which all the adjustments made have been highlighted.

We hope that we have been clear in each answer.

Thank you for your consideration of our work,

Yours,

The Authors (José Camargo, Ivan Gonzalez, and Fredy Mesa).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Boris Malomed

25 May 2023

Temperature effects on the calculation of the functional derivative of Tc with respect to α2F(ω)

PONE-D-23-09741R1

Dear Dr. Mesa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Boris Malomed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Boris Malomed

29 May 2023

PONE-D-23-09741R1

Temperature effects on the calculation of the functional derivative of Tc with respect to α2F(ω) 

Dear Dr. Mesa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Boris Malomed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES