Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1990 Sep;64(3):214–218. doi: 10.1136/hrt.64.3.214

Discrepancies in the measurement of isovolumic relaxation time: a study comparing M mode and Doppler echocardiography.

C H Lee 1, F Vancheri 1, M S Josen 1, D G Gibson 1
PMCID: PMC1024377  PMID: 2144990

Abstract

Mitral valve cusp separation on M mode echogram, the mitral valve opening artefact, and the onset of forward transmitral flow recorded by Doppler echocardiography have all been taken to mark the end of isovolumic relaxation, while its onset has been taken either as the aortic closure sound (A2) recorded phonocardiographically or the aortic closure artefact determined by Doppler technique. Possible differences in the measurement of the isovolumic relaxation time were studied when these landmarks were used in 44 healthy people, 14 patients with mitral stenosis, 21 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, and 24 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy by recording M mode echograms of the mitral valve, and pulsed and continuous wave Doppler spectra of transmitral flow, with simultaneous electrocardiograms and phonocardiograms. A2 was effectively synchronous with the aortic artefact. However, when the onset of Doppler flow was regarded as the end of isovolumic relaxation, the interval was significantly longer than when mitral cusp separation on M mode echograms was used: by 25 (10) ms in healthy individuals, by 25 (15) ms in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, and by 50 (35) ms in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. In patients with mitral stenosis the interval was only 5 (5) ms longer. The mitral valve opening artefact consistently followed the onset of flow and corresponded much more closely to the E point on the M mode echogram. This shows that it occurred during the rapid filling period and well beyond isovolumic relaxation by any definition. Thus isovolumic relaxation time measured from A2 to the onset of transmitral flow or the mitral valve opening artefact differs from that derived from A2 to mitral valve cusp separation. These intervals cannot be used interchangeably to measure "isovolumic relaxation time".

Full text

PDF
214

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brockman S. K. Mechanism of the movements of the atrioventricular valves. Am J Cardiol. 1966 May;17(5):682–690. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(66)90407-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen W., Gibson D. Relation of isovolumic relaxation to left ventricular wall movement in man. Br Heart J. 1979 Jul;42(1):51–56. doi: 10.1136/hrt.42.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gibson D. G., Prewitt T. A., Brown D. J. Analysis of left ventricular wall movement during isovolumic relaxation and its relation to coronary artery disease. Br Heart J. 1976 Oct;38(10):1010–1019. doi: 10.1136/hrt.38.10.1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hanrath P., Mathey D. G., Kremer P., Sonntag F., Bleifeld W. Effect of verapamil on left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time and regional left ventricular filling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1980 Jun;45(6):1258–1264. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90487-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatle L. K., Appleton C. P., Popp R. L. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1989 Feb;79(2):357–370. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.79.2.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klein A. L., Hatle L. K., Burstow D. J., Seward J. B., Kyle R. A., Bailey K. R., Luscher T. F., Gertz M. A., Tajik A. J. Doppler characterization of left ventricular diastolic function in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Apr;13(5):1017–1026. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mattheos M., Shapiro E., Oldershaw P. J., Sacchetti R., Gibson D. G. Non-invasive assessment of changes in left ventricular relaxation by combined phono-, echo-, and mechanocardiography. Br Heart J. 1982 Mar;47(3):253–260. doi: 10.1136/hrt.47.3.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ng K. S., Gibson D. G. Impairment of diastolic function by shortened filling period in severe left ventricular disease. Br Heart J. 1989 Oct;62(4):246–252. doi: 10.1136/hrt.62.4.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nishimura R. A., Housmans P. R., Hatle L. K., Tajik A. J. Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography. Part I. Physiologic and pathophysiologic features. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989 Jan;64(1):71–81. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65305-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pohost G. M., Dinsmore R. E., Rubenstein J. J., O'Keefe D. D., Grantham R. N., Scully H. E., Beierholm E. A., Frederiksen J. W., Weisfeldt M. L., Daggett W. M. The echocardiogram of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve. Correlation with hemodynamic and cineroentgenographic studies in dogs. Circulation. 1975 Jan;51(1):88–97. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.1.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sasson Z., Hatle L., Appleton C. P., Jewett M., Alderman E. L., Popp R. L. Intraventricular flow during isovolumic relaxation: description and characterization by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Sep;10(3):539–546. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80196-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shapiro L. M., Thwaites B. C. Measurement of isovolumic relaxation: comparison of echocardiographic mitral valve opening and Doppler mitral valve flow. Cardiovasc Res. 1987 Jul;21(7):489–491. doi: 10.1093/cvr/21.7.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tsakiris A. G., Gordon D. A., Padiyar R., Fréchette D. Relation of mitral valve opening and closure to left atrial and ventricular pressures in the intact dog. Am J Physiol. 1978 Feb;234(2):H146–H151. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1978.234.2.H146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES