Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1990 Mar;63(3):195–199. doi: 10.1136/hrt.63.3.195

Automated non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by the carbon dioxide rebreathing method: comparisons with dye dilution and thermodilution.

A E Russell 1, S A Smith 1, M J West 1, P E Aylward 1, R J McRitchie 1, R M Hassam 1, R B Minson 1, L M Wing 1, J P Chalmers 1
PMCID: PMC1024406  PMID: 2109625

Abstract

The accuracy and reproducibility of indirect measurement of cardiac output at rest by the carbon dioxide rebreathing (indirect Fick) method with an automated respiratory analysis system (Gould 9000IV) were compared with simultaneous measurements made in duplicate by dye dilution and thermodilution in 25 patients having cardiac catheterisation studies. Measurements of cardiac output by the carbon dioxide rebreathing method were not significantly different from those obtained with dye dilution (mean difference -0.3 l/min, SD 0.76, 95% confidence interval -0.7 to 0.1). Thermodilution significantly over-estimated cardiac output by a mean of 2.2 l/min or 39% (SD 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.8) compared with the carbon dioxide rebreathing method and significantly overestimated cardiac output by 1.9 l/min or 31% (SD 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.5) compared with dye dilution. The reproducibility of measurements of cardiac output in individual patients was satisfactory with the dye dilution method but was poor with carbon dioxide rebreathing and thermodilution. Indirect measurement of resting cardiac output by the Gould 9000IV automated carbon dioxide rebreathing method is more accurate but the variability inherent with this method requires that multiple measurements be taken for each determination. Measurement of cardiac output by the thermodilution method by a commercially available cardiac output computer was not satisfactory because not only was there considerable variability between repeat measurements but the method also consistently overestimated cardiac output compared with the dye dilution method.

Full text

PDF
195

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G. Statistics and ethics in medical research: V--Analysing data. Br Med J. 1980 Nov 29;281(6253):1473–1475. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6253.1473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COLLIER C. R. Determination of mixed venous CO2 tensions by rebreathing. J Appl Physiol. 1956 Jul;9(1):25–29. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1956.9.1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clausen J. P., Larsen O. A., Trap-Jensen J. Cardiac output in middle-aged patients determined with CO2 rebreathing method. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Mar;28(3):337–342. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.28.3.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis C. C., Jones N. L., Sealey B. J. Measurements of cardiac output in seriously ill patients using a CO2 rebreathing method. Chest. 1978 Feb;73(2):167–172. doi: 10.1378/chest.73.2.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dobb G. J., Donovan K. D. Non-invasive methods of measuring cardiac output. Intensive Care Med. 1987;13(5):304–309. doi: 10.1007/BF00255784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dobbs W. A., Jr, Prather J. W., Guyton A. C. Relative importance of nervous control of cardiac output and arterial pressure. Am J Cardiol. 1971 May;27(5):507–512. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(71)90413-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eccles R. C., Swinamer D. L., Jones R. L., King E. G. Validation of a compact system for measuring gas exchange. Crit Care Med. 1986 Sep;14(9):807–811. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198609000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Franciosa J. A. Application of noninvasive techniques for measuring cardiac output in hypertensive patients. Am Heart J. 1988 Aug;116(2 Pt 2):650–656. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90565-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Franciosa J. A., Ragan D. O., Rubenstone S. J. Validation of the CO2 rebreathing method for measuring cardiac output in patients with hypertension or heart failure. J Lab Clin Med. 1976 Oct;88(4):672–682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haites N. E., McLennan F. M., Mowat D. H., Rawles J. M. How far is the cardiac output? Lancet. 1984 Nov 3;2(8410):1025–1027. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91118-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hargreaves M., Jennings G. Evaluation of the CO2 rebreathing method for the non-invasive measurement of resting cardiac output in man. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1983 Sep-Oct;10(5):609–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1983.tb00230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeremy R., Tokuyasu Y., Choong C. Y., Bautovich G., Hutton B. F., Shen W. F., Kelly D. T., Harris P. J. The reproducibility of nongeometric analysis of cardiac output and left ventricular volume by radionuclide angiography. Am Heart J. 1985 Nov;110(5):1020–1026. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90203-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kubicek W. G., Karnegis J. N., Patterson R. P., Witsoe D. A., Mattson R. H. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med. 1966 Dec;37(12):1208–1212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kubo S. H., Burchenal J. E., Cody R. J. Comparison of direct Fick and thermodilution cardiac output techniques at high flow rates. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Feb 1;59(4):384–386. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90829-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levett J. M., Replogle R. L. Thermodilution cardiac output: a critical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res. 1979 Dec;27(6):392–404. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(79)90159-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mackenzie J. D., Haites N. E., Rawles J. M. Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers. Br Heart J. 1986 Jan;55(1):14–24. doi: 10.1136/hrt.55.1.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McHardy G. J. The relationship between the differences in pressure and content of carbon dioxide in arterial and venous blood. Clin Sci. 1967 Apr;32(2):299–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Muiesan G., Sorbini C. A., Solinas E., Grassi V., Casucci G., Petz E. Comparison of CO2-rebreathing and direct Fick methods for determining cardiac output. J Appl Physiol. 1968 Mar;24(3):424–429. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1968.24.3.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nadeau S., Noble W. H. Limitations of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986 Nov;33(6):780–784. doi: 10.1007/BF03027130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rawles J., Haites N. Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac output. Br J Hosp Med. 1984 Apr;31(4):292–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reddy P. S., Curtiss E. I., Bell B., O'Toole J. D., Salerni R., Leon D. F., Shaver J. A. Determinants of variation between Fick and indicator dilution estimates of cardiac output during diagnostic catheterization. Fick vs. dye cardiac outputs. J Lab Clin Med. 1976 Apr;87(4):568–576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schuster A. H., Nanda N. C. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: comparison with a non-golden standard. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):257–259. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90723-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith S. A., Russell A. E., West M. J., Chalmers J. Automated non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: comparison of electrical bioimpedance and carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques. Br Heart J. 1988 Mar;59(3):292–298. doi: 10.1136/hrt.59.3.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Swan H. J., Ganz W., Forrester J., Marcus H., Diamond G., Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970 Aug 27;283(9):447–451. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197008272830902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilmore J. H., Farrell P. A., Norton A. C., Coté R. W., 3rd, Coyle E. F., Ewy G. A., Temkin L. P., Billing J. E. An automated, indirect assessment of cardiac output during rest and exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Jun;52(6):1493–1497. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.6.1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van Grondelle A., Ditchey R. V., Groves B. M., Wagner W. W., Jr, Reeves J. T. Thermodilution method overestimates low cardiac output in humans. Am J Physiol. 1983 Oct;245(4):H690–H692. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1983.245.4.H690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES