Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common human malignancy with an estimated incidence of around 377,713 new cases worldwide in 2020. Despite the advance in clinical management, some of OSCC patients still miss the opportunity of completable resection of tumor, and have to accept medical therapies, e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy when the disease develops into the advanced stage. However, these therapies have been reported to be far from ideal due to the low efficiency of conventional delivery approaches. To obtain a better therapeutic effect, considerable attempts have been made toward to develop an effective drug delivery system (DDS). Nanoparticles (NPs) including inorganic NPs, polymer NPs, lipid NP, extracellular vesicles and cell membrane-based NPs have been evaluated as the better DDS candidates that can specifically accumulate in the tumor microenvironment along with a large amount of blood vessels. Emerging evidence suggested that NPs formulated with anticancer drugs including chemotherapeutic drugs, radiotherapy and immunotarget antibodies could remarkably improve the release and increase concentration of these drugs at the tumor site and show a better therapeutic efficacy, suggesting that NPs might serve as promising DDSs in the treatment of OSCC. Therefore, we have conducted this review to summarize recent progression and current status of diverse NPs as DDSs in this research field.
Keywords: nanoparticles, drug delivery system, oral squamous cell carcinoma, anticancer drug, treatment
1 Introduction
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common type of oral cancers, with an approximately 70% increase in incidence over the past 20 years (Gulland, 2016; Bugshan and Farooq, 2020). The estimated annual incidence of OSCC in 2020 was around 377,713 new cases worldwide, with Asia having the highest number of cases, followed by Europe and North America, according to statistical data obtained from 185 countries (Sung et al., 2021). The usual treatment for patients with early stage OSCC is surgery that can totally remove the tumors. The main clinical management for patients with advanced stage OCSS is diverse medical therapies i.e., radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapy (Nandini et al., 2020; Deshmukh et al., 2021). Although these medical therapies have been optimized over the last several decades, however, they are still far from ideal therapeutic efficacy (Siegel et al., 2020; Surer et al., 2021) and the overall 5-year survival rate is less than 60% (Yu et al., 2019). Studies indicate that one of the main mechanisms responsible for such low therapeutic effect is the low efficacy of drug delivery system (DDS) that results in anticancer drugs being too low at the tumor site to exert their anticancer effects (Zhang et al., 2020a). Therefore, considerable attempts in the development of novel DDSs that can notably increase the concentration of drugs at the tumor site have been made (Ketabat et al., 2019). Recent studies have demonstrated that nanoparticles (NPs) as DDSs might reduce the toxicity and improve the safety and specificity of drugs, and represent as a promising tool for the treatment of OSCC (Calixto et al., 2014; Sah et al., 2018; Ketabat et al., 2019).
Theoretically, NPs usually refer to particles with a particle size between 1 and 100 nm. Extensive studies show that NPs can be specifically absorbed into the interstitial space of the tumor and are not rapidly cleared through enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects, that is a really stablished and important process and can induce in an enhanced accumulation of formulated anticancer drugs within the tumor microenvironment and result in a improve therapeutic effect (Nakamura et al., 2016). Currently, considerable NPs has been developed and evaluated, results showed an encouraged result in the treatment of OSCC.
CC. We have, therefore, summarized recent advances in the applications of major NPs as novel DDSs in the treatment of OSCC. These findings might help researchers and clinicians to better understand the effects of NPs in combining with anticancer medical therapies and to design novel therapies that significantly improve therapeutic response in patients with OSCC.
2 Different NPs as DDSs in enhancing the efficacy of anticancer drugs in OCSS
Modern nanotechnology is involved in various fields of clinical research and science, where such NPs-based DDSs are of major interest (Calixto et al., 2014). Several NPs have been developed as DDSs in the treatment of OSCC, which included inorganic NPs, extracellular vesicles, polymer NPs, and lipid NPs, cell membrane-based NPs and nanoenzymes (Calixto et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2023a; Mabrouk et al., 2023; Ortega et al., 2023). The improved therapeutic effect of NPs combined with anticancer agents has been demonstrated (De Felice et al., 2019). For example, Mukherjee et al. (2022) treated OSCC cell line (KB 3-1 cell) for 24 h with cetuximab (a epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor) and NC in various doses. Comparing NC to cetuximab, they found a concentration-dependent cancer cell death that was remarkable. Therefore, NPs as promising DDS candidates have shown a great potential to increase cytotoxicity and overcome resistance to anticancer therapies, in the treatment of OSCC.
The following paragraphs will discuss the potential effect of NPs as effective DDSs individually.
2.1 Inorganic NPs
Inorganic NPs have been broadly used as DDSs in the treatment of tumors due to their unique physicochemical properties, e.g., facile preparation, excellent biocompatibility and wide surface conjugation chemistry (Wang et al., 2016), including various gold NPs, platinum NPs, iron NPs, manganese NPs, and silicon NPs, etc. For example, gold NPs have unique optical and surface plasmon resonance properties, making them particularly suitable for the ultra-sensitive detection and imaging-based therapeutic techniques needed to treat cancer (Singh et al., 2018). Due to the strong anticancer effect of platinum, platinum NPs also possess efficient anticancer ability despite behaving differently from platinum-containing compounds (Abed et al., 2022). Another commonly used inorganic NPs, iron oxide, is superparamagnetic at certain sizes and has been widely used as a contrast agent and drug delivery vehicle to treat cancer (Arias et al., 2018). A reduced toxicity, greater tolerance to organic solvents, and higher bioavailability than free drugs have been demonstrated in experiments (Ketabat et al., 2019). The characteristics of each inorganic nanoparticle are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Exhibitions of inorganic NPs as drug delivery system in OSCC.
| Inorganic nanoparticles | Experimental models/cells | Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| GNP | NIH-3T3、UPCI-SCC-131 | Enhance efficacy of radiotherapy | Surer et al. (2021) |
| GNP-CDDP | NIH-3T3 | Reduce OSCC cell activity | |
| UPCI-SCC-131 | Enhance efficacy of radiotherapy | ||
| GNP-CDDP-CTX | NIH-3T3、UPCI-SCC-131 | Reduce OSCC cell activity | |
| 5-Fu、CPT、FGFR1i combined with AuNSs | Chemical induced hamster buccal pouch carcinoma model (HBPC) | FGFR1i-AuNSs Induce a more pronounced sub-G1 cell population | Abdel Hamid et al. (2021) |
| FGFR1i-AuNSs induced higher tumor reduction rates than other groups | |||
| AuNS selectively enhance the therapeutic effect of small molecule inhibitors | |||
| GA-AuNPs | Cal-27 | GA-AuNPs induce cytotoxicity | Gamal-Eldeen et al. (2021) |
| Inhibition of cellular hypoxia effects in a dose-dependent manner | |||
| Induces early and late apoptosis in CAL-27 cells | |||
| Significantly decreased the expression of miR-210 and miR-21 | |||
| Inhibits HIF-1α and c-Myc | |||
| Potential to reduce hypoxic and hypoxic expression levels | |||
| GNP、PD-L1、NTP | SCC-25 | Enhance cellular intake of drugs | Liu et al. (2020) |
| Reduce OSCC cell activity | |||
| Promote apoptotic protein expression | |||
| (PDPN Ab)-AuNP-DOX | Noncancerous 293T cells | Reduced cytotoxicity | Liu et al. (2020) |
| Cal-27 | Enhance cellular intake of drugs | ||
| Enhance anticancer efficacy with PTT | |||
| Xenograft Model by Subcutaneous Injection of CAL-27 | Enhance anticancer efficacy of PTT, increased DOX concentration in tumor site | ||
| HSC-3 、HaCat | Enhanced apoptosis in tumor cells | Essawy et al. (2021) | |
| Ph sensitive DOX-s-AuNPs | Chemical induced hamster buccal pouch carcinoma model (HBPC) | DOX-N-N-AuNPs-treated animals had significantly reduced tumor size and high survival rates without hematopoietic adverse effects | |
| Ph stable DOX-N-N-AuNPs | DOX-N-N-AuNPs enhance apoptosis in tumor cells | ||
| GNSb | Mouse L929 fibroblast cell line, CAL-27 | Selective toxicity higher cellular uptake of drugs | Chen et al. (2021) |
| Combined radiation enhances cytotoxicity, forms more ROS, induces more pronounced DNA double-strand breaks and arrest in G2/M phase | |||
| OSCC Xenograft Model Established by Injecting CAL-27 into Mice | Combining radiation significantly inhibits tumor growth | ||
| OSC-19 | CRDs induce higher cytotoxicity | Zuo et al. (2020) | |
| CRDs are highly biocompatible | |||
| Cu2-x-S-RB@DMSN-AE105 (CRDA) | Xenograft Model by Subcutaneous Injection of OSC-19 cells in Mice | CRDs accumulate faster and higher at tumor sites inhibit tumor cell proliferation | |
| Cu2-x-S-RB@DMSN Nanoparticles (CRDs) | Reduce tumor cells and increase the proportion of apoptotic areas | ||
| Combined PTT and SDT eradicated xenografts and prolonged mouse survival | |||
| SPION | OSCC cells | Decreased SDH activity, increased ROS levels, MMP collapse, mitochondrial swelling, and cytochrome c release in mitochondria of OSCC cells | Afrasiabi et al. (2021) |
| Decreased cell viability, increased LPO levels and caspase-3 activation in OSCC cells | |||
| PtNCP (platinum nanocomposite beads) | HSC-3-M3 | Inhibit OSCC cell activity in a dose-response manner | Tanaka et al. (2019) |
| Promote cytotoxicity via LDH | |||
| Xenograft Model by Subcutaneous Injection of HSC-3-M3 in Mice | Suppress tumor growth | ||
| Induce tumor cell necrosis | |||
| Nano-SHAP contained cisplatin and carboplatin | HSC-4、KOSC、SAS | Suppress tumor cell proliferation | Murata et al. (2018) |
| UCA-cMBP | Cal-27、A549、HeLa 、4T1 、MCF-10 A | Better targeting ability to Cal27 cells | Lin et al. (2021) |
| Enhanced cellular uptake of drugs | |||
| Inhibit the invasion and metastasis of Cal27 cells | |||
| Concentration-dependent apoptosis in tumor cells | |||
| Mice were injected intravenously with UCA-cMBP | Good clearance from the body without significant organ damage | ||
| Anti-GFR-PEG-TiO 2-UCNs | CAL-27、H596 (HTB-178) 和 H460 (HTB-177)、A549 (CCL-185)、MCF-7 (HTB-22)、Hep-G2 (HB-8065) 和 NHF (IMR-90) | Faster and more efficient internalization by OSCC cells | Lucky et al. (2016) |
| Selectively kills EGFR expressing cells | |||
| Xenograft Model Established by Injecting OSCC cells into Mice | Mice exhibited significant tumor growth delay and higher survival | ||
| S-CD | UM1 cell line derived from HNSCC patient | The ability to generate singlet oxygen under light is higher than that of traditional 5-ALA | Li et al. (2020a) |
| When it is taken up by cells under light, the cell viability decreases immediately, and it is concentration-dependent | |||
| Exhibits low cytotoxicity in the absence of light | |||
| NCQD-HCS | FaDu cell, HaCaT cell | NCQD-HCS was internalized by cells and induced a significant thermal ablation effect in FaDu cells when exposed to 980 nm near-infrared laser light | Das et al. (2019) |
| GQD-PEG | SCC-25、SCC-9 、HOK | Has strong phototoxicity | Zhang et al. (2020b) |
| Low cytotoxicity, satisfactory solution stability and excellent endocytosis | |||
| Xenograft Model by Subcutaneous Injection of SCC VII in Mice | Significantly increases host immune-associated CD8+ T cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines | ||
| Robust ablation of OSCC and tumor-targeted accumulation under photoirradiation | |||
| H-MnO 2-PEG/TP nanoshells | CAL-27、SCC-7 | Cell proliferation, colony formation, and migration abilities were significantly reduced | Zhang et al. (2020b) |
| Enhanced apoptosis in tumor cells | |||
| Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) was downregulated | |||
| Xenograft Model by Intravenous or Subcutaneous Injection of CAL-27 in Mice | The uptake ratio of drugs between tumor and normal organs in mice was significantly increased | ||
| Most tumor cells are severely damaged | |||
| Enhanced apoptosis |
2.1.1 Gold NPs (AuNPs or GNPs)
Gold NPs, as DDS, have been extensively studied, and promising results were observed. For example, Abdel Hamid et al. (2021) used AuNS as a drug delivery vectors to evaluate the combination effect of cytotoxic chemo-drugs 5- fluorouracil (5-Fu), camptothecin (CPT), and small molecule inhibitor fibroblast growth factor receptor1-inhibitor (FGFR1i) both in vitro and in vivo in the oral cancer, survival analysis data showed that Syrian golden male hamsters treated with conjugating AuNSs with FGFR1i, 5Fu, and CPT could remarkedly enhance survival time to more than 27 days, which was much longer than animals treated with free FGFR1i (survival time 13.5 days). In addition, animals treated with FGFR1i-AuNSs induced the highest tumor volume reduction with a 2-fold decrease (−63.09%) compared with those injected by CPT-AuNSs (−32.1%) or 5Fu-AuNSs (−43.4%) (Abdel Hamid et al., 2021). When Gamal-Eldeen et al. (2021) examined the effect of gum arabic encapsulated gold NPsNPs (GA-AuNPs) on the hypoxia regulators in tongue squamous cell carcinoma (CAL-27 cells) in vitro, they found that GA-AuNPs can remarkably reduce cell viability with IC50 of 392.3 and 247.3 μg/mL after 24 and 48 h, respectively, and increase CAL-27 cell death rate via enhanced apoptosis. In addition, GA-AuNPs significantly inhibited hypoxia production in a dose-dependent manner, which could be via the decreased expression of hypoxia-regulating miRNAs (miR-210 and miR-21), hypoxia inducible factor-1 α (HIF-1α) and c-Myc (factors influence cell survival and angiogenesis) by GA-AuNPs (30% IC50, for 48 h) (Gamal-Eldeen et al., 2021). Park et al. (2021) investigated the effectiveness of a novel combination therapy by using gold nanoparticles (GNP) conjugated to anti programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies and nonthermal plasma (NTP) in PD-L1 expressing SCC-25 cells. They found that immunotarget anti- PD-L1 antibody and NTP-conjugated gold NPs could specifically bind to SCC-25 cells and induced an increase in the selective uptake of anti-PD-L1 antibody + GNP on SCC-25 cells, but significantly reduced tumor cell viability. In addition, the expression of apoptosis-related proteins and the number of dead cells were remarkably increased after treatment with anti-PD-L1 antibody + GNP + NTP. Thus, their results suggested a synergistic therapeutic effect than monotherapy.
In addition, some gold NPs can also increase the respond to environmental conditions such as light and heat. These features allowed gold NPs conjugated with radiotherapy, phototherapy, or photothermal therapy to potent their therapeutic effect. Indeed, Inanc Surer et al. (2021) used nanodrug complex containing cetuximab (CTX) and cisplatin (CDDP) conjugated with gold NPs to evaluate its therapeutic effects in both radioresistant oral cancer cell line (UPCI-SCC-131) and fibroblast cell line (NIH-3T3) in vitro. The results showed that the combination of nanodrugs GNP-CTX or CDDP with radiotherapy significantly result in 2-fold and 9-fold greater decrease in the colony number of radioresistant oral cancer cells than radiotherapy alone or free CTX combined with radiotherapy respectively (Surer et al., 2021). Furthermore, PEG-stabilized, PDPN antibody and doxorubicin (DOX)-conjugated gold NPs and Ph-stabilized DOX-AuNPs (DOX-NN-AuNPs) in combining with laser treatment could significantly increase apoptosis and decrease the growth of tumor cells (Liu et al., 2020; Essawy et al., 2021). The study by Chen et al. (2021) showed that gold nano-sesame beads (GNSbs) in combining with 2 Gy irradiation significantly increased the cytotoxic activity and decreased the proliferation activity of CAL-27 cells in a concentration-dependent manner, and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as compared with irradiation alone (Chen et al., 2021). In mice with CAL-27 orthotopically injected into the oral wall model, radiotherapy combining with GNSbs (delivered every 3 days for a total dose of 10 Gy (irradiation × 5 times) and 54 mg kg−1 GNSbs) treatment resulted in a significantly decrease in average tumor size from day 0 to day 21 (Chen et al., 2021). These results suggest that GNSbs is a promising radioenhancer that enhances the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy in OSCC.
2.1.2 Mesoporous silica NPs (MSNs)
Due to their distinguishing characteristics, such as pore volume, large specific surface area, controllable particle size, and great biocompatibility, MSNs as DDSs have attracted considerable attention and been intensively studied (Wang et al., 2015). Shi et al. (2019) reported that delivery of MTH1 inhibitor (TH287) and MDR1 siRNA via hyaluronic acid-based MSN in CAL-27 OSCC cells could induce more effective anticancer effects in vitro. In male Balb/c mice with subcutaneously injecting 2 × 106 CAL27 cells model, both SiTMSN and HA-siTMSN showed an antitumor effect. However, HA-siTMSN induced 4-fold decrease in the tumor volume compared to that of control and 2-fold compared to that of the siTMSN. indicating its stronger anti-oral cancer efficacy. By using the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-targeting ligand AE105 decorated dendritic mesoporous silica nanoparticles (DMSN) encapsulating photonic active ultrasmall Cu2−xS NPs and sonosensitizer Rose Bengal (RB) (Cu2−xS-RB@DMSN-AE105, abbreviated as CRDA), Zuo et al. (2020) showed an increase of CRAD at tumor site and induced higher cytotoxicity, inhibit cell proliferation, reduce tumor cells by increasing apoptosis rate in OSCC cells. Furthermore, they further evaluated synergetic therapeutics of CRDAs against OSCC xenografts in BALB/c mice, their results showed that CRAD combined with photonic hyperthermal therapy (PTT) or sonodynamic therapy (SDT) in mice elicited enhanced therapeutic efficacy with an inhibition rate of 103.4%. The eradication of the xenografts in the CRDAs + US + laser group were enhanced, the survival rate was increased and living time of mice was prolonged (Zuo et al., 2020).
2.1.3 Other inorganic NPs
There are other inorganic NPs have been assessed. For example, both platinum nanocomposite (PtNCP) beads and superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs (SPION) were found to be cytotoxic to OSCC cells (Tanaka et al., 2019; Afrasiabi et al., 2021), Tanaka et al. (2019) reported that PtNCP could significantly inhibit tumor growth and caused more pathological necrosis area in subcutaneously xenografting mice with human squamous cell carcinoma cells, HSC-3-M3. They found that the mean tumor volumes in HSC-3-M3 cells xenografts in mice receiving PtNCP treatment for 14 days were significantly reduced than that in untreated group (PtNCP treated group vs. untreated group: 91.38 vs. 206.18 mm3). The inhibition rate on tumor volume in PtNCP treated group was 44.32% compared to untreated group (Tanaka et al., 2019). Histologically, necrotic areas in tumors were frequently observed in the PtNCP beads-treated group compared to the untreated group (Tanaka et al., 2019). Their findings suggest an inhibitory effect of PtNCP on OSCC.
The use of hollow mesoporous MnO2 (H-MnO2) nanoshells formulated with docetaxel and cisplatin and highly dispersed calcined hydroxyapatite NPs (nano-SHAP) loaded with zoledronic acid (ZA) were both shown to inhibit OSCC cell proliferation (Murata et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2021). Murata et al. (Zhou et al., 2021) evaluated the effect of hydroxyapatite anoparticle as a new DDS on OSCC cell line, their results showed that Nano-SHAP with ZA suppressed remarkably OSCC tumor cell growth, damage tumor cells and upregulate apoptosis in OSCC in vivo.
By using dual-modal optical imaging rare earth nanoparticle (RENP) probes with peptide functionalization (RENP@C@Au (UCA)), Lin et al. (2021) demonstrated that it could effectively target Cal-27 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) cells, enhance cell uptake of drug, inhibit invasion and metastasis, cause concentration-dependent apoptosis, and has an excellent in vivo clearance rate without causing significant organ damage.
In addition, photothermal Therapy has been shown to be a potential therapeutic approach in treating OSCC (Ran et al., 2023). Based on the properties of near-infrared (NIR) excitable upconversion NPs (UCN), photosensitizers such as photodynamic therapy (PDT) agents (Lucky et al., 2016), sulfur-doped carbon dots (S-CD) (Li et al., 2020a), nitrogen-rich mesoporous carbon Nanosphere void spaces trapping ultra-small nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots (NCQDs) (Das et al., 2019) have been reported to show an enhanced therapeutic effect. Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) as the photosensitizer and GQD-polyethylene glycol (PEG) obtained by combining with PEG (Zhang et al., 2020b) have also been found to enhance the antitumor effect in the combination with different degrees of light in subcutaneously xenografting mice with SCC VII cells. They found that SCC VII tumor-bearing C3H mice treated with GQD-PEG plus irradiation induced tumor size reduction exceeding 70%, compared with control groups, they concluded that such antitumor effect might be attributable to the efficient tumor accumulations mediated by the EPR effect and the high 1O2 toxicity induced from photoactivity (Zhang et al., 2020b).
For the convenience of readers, the characteristics of these NPs are summarized in Table 1.
2.2 Extracellular vesicles (EVs)
EVs are natural nano-sized lipid bilayer vesicles released by all cell types and can be found in biological fluids such as blood, saliva, breast milk, cerebrospinal fluids and malignant ascites (Elsharkasy et al., 2020). Multiple studies have shown that EVs have a similar specific cellular tropism, which function as target vesicles for specific tissues and/or organs. Exosomes (EXO), nanoscale vesicles secreted by various cells, have the ability to cross biological barriers, including the most impenetrable blood-brain barrier (Batrakova and Kim, 2015; Wiklander et al., 2015) and attract a high attention (Wiklander et al., 2015).
Qiu et al. (2020) found that the loading and release of CTX from mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-derived EXO (MSC-EXO) significantly inhibited tumor growth by the activation of PI3K, Akt and mTOR and the induction of apoptosis in SCC-25 cells in a dose-dependent manner. They further showed that such inhibitory degree was in an effective synergistic and pharmacological effect. By developing a pH/light sensitive drug system based on milk-EXO for OSCC therapy, Zhang et al. (2020c found that a bovine milk EXO-based EXO-doxorubicin (DOX)-anthracene endoperoxide derivative (Exo@Dox-EPT1) could remarkably increase cellular uptake, release of DOX under an acidic microenvironment and generate ROS in combination with 808 nm NIR laser stimulation [31]. This new milk-EXO-based DDS exhibited an significant control effect on drug-release, biocompatibility and OSCC cell growth.
Apart from its inhibitory effect on OSCC cells, bitter melon-derived extracellular vesicles (BMEV) have been found to suppress the expression of NLRP3 and IL-1β and reduce the tumor resistance to 5-FU via an increase in apoptosis rate in OSCC cells (Yang et al., 2021). By using γδ T cell-derived extracellular vesicles (γδ TDE) loaded with miR-138, Li et al. (2019) showed that γδ TDE could directly inhibit OSCC tumor progression by up-regulating anti-tumor immunity through enhanced CD8 + T cells in pre-immunized immunocompetent C3H mice.
Regarding the role of EVs as DDSs in treating OSCC, we have summarized it in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Exhibitions of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as natural nano drug delivery system in OSCC.
| EVS | Models/cells | Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMEV | CAL-27、WSU-HN6 | Induces S-phase arrest to inhibit cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner | Yang et al. (2021) |
| Upregulation of caspase 3 and stimulation of ROS generation to induce apoptosis in OSCC cells | |||
| Downregulation of NLRP3 expression | |||
| BMEV、5-FU | OSCC xenograft model by injecting CAL-27 into mice | Decreased expression of NLRP3 and IL-1β | |
| Reduce tumor resistance to 5-FU | |||
| Increased apoptosis rate of OSCC cells | |||
| MSCT-EXO/CTX | SCC-25 | Inhibits the activation of PI3K, Akt and mTOR | Qiu et al. (2020) |
| Induces apoptosis of SCC25 tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner | |||
| OSCC xenograft model by injecting SCC-25 into mice | Tumor size shrinks | ||
| Increased tumor suppression rate | |||
| Exo@Dox-EPT1 | HSC-3、SCC-9、CAL-27 | Increase cellular uptake | Zhang et al. (2020c) |
| Sustained release of Dox under acidic conditions | |||
| Efficient generation of ROS after stimulation with 808 nm NIR laser | |||
| The cytotoxicity of NP 808 group to cancer cells was significantly higher than that of free Dox group | |||
| Mouse Models of HSC-3, SCC-9, and CAL-27 Xenograft Tumors | The tumor growth in the NP 808 group was effectively inhibited and almost disappeared after treatment | ||
| Enhance drug accumulation and retention in tumor tissue | |||
| Has good biocompatibility | |||
| γδ TDE loaded with miR-138 | Cal-27 、SCC-VII | Regulation of antitumor immunity by CD8+ T cells | Li et al. (2019) |
| Xenograft Models Established by Subcutaneous Injection of Tumor Cells in Immunodeficient Nude and Immunocompetent C3H Mice | Preimmunized immunocompetent C3H mice and directly inhibited OSCC tumor growth |
2.3 Polymer NPs
Polymer NPs, including natural polymers and semi-synthetic polymer NPs, possess the promoting potential to cellular permeability (Charbe et al., 2020; Xia et al., 2021). Among them, some polymer NPs with good biocompatibility and controlled drug release as targeted DDSs have been evaluated (Rizvi and Saleh, 2018).
Kurakula and Naveen (2020) loaded quercetin-doped chitosan-coated simvastatin (SIM) NPs in an in situ gel (ISG) (SIM-QRC NP-loaded ISGs) and demonstrated an delay of drug release, which resulted in a markedly increase in caspase-3-mediated apoptosis and tumor suppressor protein expression in tongue SSC cells. Enășescu et al. (2021) found that lutein and poly (d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) NPs potentially downregulated matrix metallopeptidase 9 level in human OSCC cells, which has been recognized as a protecting factor that could against local invasion in tumors (Chakraborty et al., 2023). Furthermore, both DOX-loaded catechol (Cat)-modified chitosan/hyaluronic acid (HA) NPs (Cat-NPs) and phloretin-loaded chitosan NPs (PhCsNPs) could increase the release of DOX, which significantly inhibited cancer cell growth and increased apoptosis rate in human oral cancer cells (Mariadoss et al., 2019; Pornpitchanarong et al., 2020). Endo et al. (2013) reported that commonly used chemotherapy drug cisplatin-carrying polymer micelles (NC-6004) showed an equivalent antitumor effect as free cisplatin in vivo, although the inhibitory effect on the growth of oral cancer cells was less than that of free cisplatin in vitro. The authors also found that the toxicity of NC-6004 to kidney and the incidence of lymphatic metastasis were lower than free cisplatin (Endo et al., 2013). Li et al. (2020b) found that polylactic acid (PLA) combined with CDDP-chloroquine (CQ) NPs (CDDP/CQ-PLA NPs) could induce a stronger activation of caspase-3 pathway and the induction of ROS than PLA combined with CDDP NPs (CDDP-PLA NPs), which leaded to an increased rate of caspase-dependent apoptosis and but lower rate of autophagy in OSCC (Li et al., 2020b).
Polymer NPs with targeting function have broad prospects as DDS. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) can be loaded onto PLGA-PEG and then modified with PD-L1 antibody to prepare ATRA- Targeted α-t- FU-PLGA NPs (Srivastava et al., 2019), glutathione (GSH)-sensitive and folic acid (FA)-targeted paclitaxel-loaded NPs (FA-PEG-SS-PCL@PTX, FA-NPs) (Fan et al., 2020a), cRGD targeted polycarbonate (PCA) copolymer-based NPs (NanoPCA) loaded with DOX (NanoPCA-cRGD) (Yunxia et al., 2018) have been proved to have a good targeting effect, which can precisely release and enhance antitumor efficacy of diverse anti-tumor drugs. To evaluate the potential effect of polymer NPs on immune checkpoint inhibitor in oral dysplasia and squamous carcinoma cells, Chen et al. (2020) examined CD8+ T cells surrounding PD-L1-positive cells in the tumor microenvironment. Both in vitro and in vivo results showed that CD8+ T cells were more activated after ATRA-PLGA-PEG-PD-L1 treatment (Chen et al., 2020).
Finally, polymer NPs combined with radiotherapy also exhibited an improved therapeutic effect on OSSC. Lang et al. (2020) reported that radiation combined with capivasertib-encapsulated cathepsin B (CTSB)-reactive NPs could significantly reduce tumor cell viability and increase the rate of apoptosis than radiation alone, or free capivasertib in OSCC cells, providing a novel strategy to improve therapeutic strategy for patients with radiation resistant.
The effects of polymer NPs as DDSs in the oral cancer were summarized in Tables 3, 4.
TABLE 3.
Exhibitions of polymer NPs as drug delivery systemin in OSCC.
| Polymer nanoparticles | Models/cells | Exhibitions | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATRA-PLGA-PEG-PD-L1 | DOK、CAL-27 | fast cellular uptake of drugs | Chen et al. (2020) |
| Significantly inhibit cell proliferation induce apoptosis | |||
| Xenograft model established by subcutaneous injection of SCC-7 cells in mice | Specifically targeting tumor cells | ||
| Enhance anticancer activity | |||
| Reduce side effects of drugs | |||
| Activate CD8+ T cells and PD-L1-positive cells in the tumor microenvironment | |||
| CDDP/CQ-PLA NPs and CDDP-PLA NPs | CAL-27 cells | Reliable performance in nano drug loading and drug release | Li et al. (2020b) |
| CDDP/CQ-PLA NPs lead to more caspase-dependent apoptosis than CDDP-PLA NPs through the caspase-3 pathway and induce more ROS production | |||
| Cathepsin B-reactive nanoparticles encapsulate capivasertib (Nano-cap) | SCC-35、CAL-27、HN6、HN12 cells | Reduce tumor cell viability | Lang et al. (2020) |
| Induce tumor cell apoptosis | |||
| Xenograft model established by injecting HN12 cells into NSG mice | Induces apoptosis of OSCC tumor cells | ||
| Shrink the tumor | |||
| α-t-FU-PLGA NPs | SCC-15 cells | Higher cytotoxicity | Srivastava et al. (2019) |
| Higher cell penetration | |||
| Higher accumulation of cancer cells | |||
| FA-PEG-SS-PCL@PTX, FA-NPs | HSC-3 cells | PTX in FA-NPs can be precisely released and enhance cell growth inhibition in FA-overexpressing HSC3 cells | Fan et al. (2020a) |
| Xenograft model established by subcutaneous injection of HSC-3 cells in mice | FA-NPs can accumulate in HSC3 cells and exhibit greater antitumor efficacy than free PTX and PEG-SS-PCL@PTX treatment with reduced side effects | ||
| ISG loaded with SIM-QRC NP | HSC-3 cells | The drug is released slowly and takes 96 h to reach the plateau | Kurakula and Naveen (2020) |
| Significantly increased apoptosis mediated by caspase-3 | |||
| Increased tumor suppressor protein levels | |||
| Lut Nps | BICR10 OSCC cells (ECACC 04072103) | Downregulates MMP-9 levels | Enășescu et al. (2021) |
| NanoPCA, including P(CA-co-LA), P(CA-co-LA)-g-MPEG, P(CA-co-LA)-g-PEG-cRGD] | Excellent drug loading capacity (9.1% mass ratio) long-term stability in water | Yunxia et al. (2018) | |
| SCC15 cells | The cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction of DOX released by NanoPCA are not as good as that of free DOX | ||
| Slow and stable release, faster release under acidic conditions | |||
| NanoPCA-cRGD can enhance DOX uptake by SCC-15 cells through active targeting of cRGD | |||
| Xenograft model established by subcutaneous injection of SCC15 cells in mice | DOX-loaded NanoPCA significantly inhibits tumor growth and prolongs the survival time of mice | ||
| No obvious adverse reactions | |||
| Cat-NPs loaded with DOX | Pig buccal oral mucosa | Excellent mucoadhesive ability, high drug loading and slow drug release | Pornpitchanarong et al. (2020) |
| HN22 cells | More extensive uptake and accumulation in cancer cells | ||
| PhCsNPs | HEK-293、KB cells | PhCsNPs release phloretin in the acidic environment of cancer cells with sustained and controlled drug release | Mariadoss et al. (2019) |
| Enhances mitochondria-mediated apoptosis by inducing intracellular ROS production, stimulating oxidative stress, depleting cellular antioxidants, and cell cycle arrest | |||
| siTMSN 和 HA-siTMSN | CAL-27 cells | Effective control of drug release and internalization in cancer cells | Shi et al. (2019) |
| The combination of TH287 + MDR1 siRNA is more effective in inducing anticancer effects | |||
| Xenograft model established by subcutaneous injection of CAL-27 cells in mice | SiTMSN and HA-siTMSN significantly reduce tumor size | ||
| NC‐6004 | OSC-19、OSC-20、HSC-3 、HSC-4 | NC‐6004 was significantly less growth inhibitory than free CDDP | Endo et al. (2013) |
| Xenograft model established by subcutaneous injection of OSC-19 cells in mice | NC‐6004 and free CDDP show equivalent antitumor effects | ||
| NC-6004 is less toxic to the kidney than free CDDP | |||
| NC-6004 also has a lower incidence of lymphatic metastasis |
TABLE 4.
Exhibitions of lipid NPs as drug delivery systemin in OSCC.
| Lipid nanoparticles | Cells/models | Exhibitions | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLN loaded with PTX, 5-FU and AA individually | 4-NQO-induced OSCC mouse model | Combination of PTX-loaded SLN and AA-loaded SLN has greater efficacy in OSCC | Bharadwaj et al. (2019) |
| SAS cells | LPC shows greater cancer cell killing than CDDP | Gusti-Ngurah-Putu et al. (2019) | |
| SCC model established by subcutaneous inoculation of SAS cells in mice | PDT + LPC significantly reduced tumor volume by approximately 112%, stronger than LPC, PDT + CDDP or CDDP groups | ||
| LPC NPs | Reduced tumor growth rate | ||
| LPC NPs | Significantly less side effects | ||
| PDT + LPC or LPC treatment had minimal adverse effects on kidney injury compared with CDDP or PDT + CDDP group | |||
| Strong additive effects of PDT enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy of LPC NPs |
2.4 Lipid NPs
Lipid NPs are delivered into tumor tissue through the passively targeted EPR effects. To obtain an selective targeting efficacy, ligands can also be attached to the surface of lipid NPs. Lipid NPs are ideal carriers for drugs with low water solubility because of their ability to penetrate cancer cells and the high stability, allowing the controlled release of loaded drugs, and protecting drugs from chemical degradation (Coelho et al., 2010).
In the context of OSCC, Bharadwaj et al. (2019) used solid lipid NPs (SLN) loaded with paclitaxel (PTX), 5-FU and ascorbic acid individually to treat OSCC cells. They reported that the combination of SLN loaded with PTX and ascorbic acid respectively exhibited a better therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of OSCC in 4-NQO induced OSCC mouse model. After 2 weeks treatment, pathological analysis showed that dysplastic degree of tumor was decreased. Their results provided valuable insights for the design of novel combinational therapeutic strategies for the treatment of OSCC. Gusti-Ngurah-Putu et al. (2019) evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of PDT + lipid-platinum-chloride nanoparticles (LPC NPs) on a xenograft model of OSCC. Mice treated with PDT + LPC exhibited an significantly reduced tumor volume by up to ∼112% as compared with the control mice, histological analysis confirmed that proliferation index was decreased, but apoptosis rate increased in OSCC cells. In addition, side effects on renal damage was reduced (Gusti-Ngurah-Putu et al., 2019). Their results indicated that combined PDT with LPC NPs could significantly enhance the medicinal outcome in human OSCC.
3 Cell membrane-based NPs
Recently, studies revealed that cell membrane-based NPs are an emerging technique that uses cell membranes to directly coat the outermost layer of NPs (Pereira-Silva et al., 2020) and can maximize drug targeting by exploiting the inherited bio-functionalities of cell membranes (CM) extracted from source cells and might potentially enhance the effect of anticancer drugs (Pereira-Silva et al., 2020). Thus, CM-based NPs have received widespread attention in the field of cancer (Sushnitha et al., 2020).
Using this approach, Shi et al. (2020) prepared poly (β-amino ester)/PLGA nanoparticles co-loaded with indocyanine green and Nrf2-siRNA and then encapsulated them in vesicles derived from OSCC CM to form M@PPI-siRNA. They reported that photosensitizer indocyanine green (ICG) and Nrf2-siRNA encapsulated within the vesicles of cancer cell CM showed an synergistic anticancer effect of PTT and amplified PDT in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells through an inhibitory effect on the proliferation and stimulatory effect on the apoptosis of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells. Dai et al. (2022) developed the biomimetic nanomaterial PCN-CQ@CCM that could homologously adhere to cancer cells, enhancing the retention and uptake of nanomaterials in the tumor microenvironment. Their results showed that such biomimetic nanomaterial system could synergically potent the effect of PDT by inhibiting macrophage phagocytosis in oral cancer (Dai et al., 2022). Chen et al. (2023b) further synthetized an biomimetic nanomaterial system named cobalt-ferrocene metal–organic framework (Co-Fc) and loaded with the classical autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (Co-Fc@HCQ) nanoparticles and then constructed with CMM extracted from CAL-27 OSCC cells, which reduced immune escape and macrophage phagocytosis in OSCC cells. These findings indicate that CM may be used as an efficient synergist of PDT for OSCC treatment.
Taken together above reviewing data, we have summarized current findings in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1.
Schematic summary of NPs as DDSs for the treatment of OSCC. Analysis of current studies suggested that several NPs, including inorganic NPs, extracellular vesicles, polymer NPs, lipid NPs, and cell membrane-based NPs, have been developed as DDSs for the treatment of OSCC and showed an enhanced therapeutic efficacy through multiple mechanisms.
4 Current challenges of the strategies of NPs as DDSs in OSCC
Despite encouraging findings demonstrating their exciting potential of NPs as DDSs in the treatment of OSCC, however a number of challenges remain. For example, experimental models used in vivo and in vitro studies were different to human OSCC in the oral environment. Most of in vitro models used OSCC cell lines that derived from human OSCC and cultured in experimental media and treated with NPs combined with anticancer drugs, which is much simple than physiological oral condition. Even in vivo animal models, whether subcutaneous xenotransplanted mice or in situ oral tumor mice, face problems such as lack of normal-precancerous-cancerous process, which is different to the process of human OSCC (Montenegro et al., 2016). Thus, how to develop an experimental model that well mimics the human oral environment and can be used for the verification of in vivo animal and in vitro cellular findings become necessary. Various novel NPs-based DDSs have been extensively studied. However, in vivo bioavailability data was still waiting to be investigated (Sachdeva et al., 2022). Furthermore, studies on long-term toxicity and side effects of NPs in human body are needed to be conducted. Therefore, more detailed studies are required to evaluate biosafety of all types of NPs. Particularly, there is a lack of ongoing and completed clinical trials in patients with OSCC so far (De Felice et al., 2019), which is a necessary step for the definition of the potential oncology applications of NPs as DDSs in daily clinical practice in the treatment of OSCC in the future. Therefore, how to develop NPs as DDSs in a cheaper, easier, and faster way still remains a technical hurdle. Until these issues are resolved, clinical trials can be considered.
Unlike other human cancers, such as gastric, colorectal and lung cancers, OSCC is not rich in angiogenesis, which means that the level of chemotherapeutic drugs (such as paclitaxel and platinum-based drugs) that normally enter the circulation and reach the tumor site, by oral or intravenous administration, is limited (Bhat et al., 2021; Kitamura et al., 2021). In addition, the use of these free drugs is faced with poor therapeutic efficacy and severe side effects. Therefore, NPs-based therapies become particularly suitable for enhancing the bioavailability of chemotherapeutic drugs and target delivery to the tumor site, which can significantly improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects (De Felice et al., 2019). In addition, unlike tumors located deeply in the human body, such as colon cancer and liver cancer, OSCC is located at surface such as the buccal mucosa and tongue, which makes that OSCC is suitable for combinational treatment with NPs-mediated/enhanced PDT/PTT (Fan et al., 2020b). Also, hydrogels that can be applied to the surface of the skin or placed inside the surgical wound are options for the treatment of OSCC (Sepantafar et al., 2017).
5 Conclusion marks and perspectives
OSCC patients with advanced stage are often unresectable and metastatic, therapeutic approaches are commonly chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and biotherapy, which have various limitations and shortcomings and result in a decreased therapeutic response in clinical practice. For example, these conventional therapeutic approaches lack optimal anticancer effects, however, they may induce strong site effects e.g., non-specific cell toxicity that can significantly damage health cells during the treatment period and some patients have to cease therapies. Therefore, the improvement of these therapeutic efficacy become critically important. It is becoming evident that NPs can be used as DDSs and combined with different therapies to achieve an better therapeutic effect in patients with OSCC due to their ultra-small size, functional modification, and responsiveness to heat, light and other conditions as compared with conventional drug delivery approaches. Further work that verifies and confirms the improvement of clinical efficacy of different NPs as DDSs combining with anticancer drugs in treating patients with OSCC is necessary and important.
Author contributions
GC conceived the outline of the manuscript. SC and HL performed the electronic search for literatures and selection, data extraction and analysis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Glossary
| ATRA | all-trans retinoic acid |
| AuNPs or GNPs | gold nanoparticles |
| BMEV | bitter melon-derived extracellular vesicles |
| Cat | catechol |
| Cat-NPs | catechol (Cat)-modified chitosan/hyaluronic acid (HA) nanoparticles |
| CTSB | capivasertib-encapsulated cathepsin B |
| CDDP | a nanodrug complex containing cetuximab (CTX) and cisplatin |
| CDDP-PLA NPs | PLA combined with CDDP nanoparticles |
| CM | cell memberane |
| Co-Fc | cobalt-ferrocene metal–organic framework |
| CRDA | Cu2−xS-RB@DMSN-AE105 |
| CQ | chloroquine |
| CTX | cetuximab |
| DDS | drug delivery system |
| DMSN | dendritic mesoporous silica nanoparticles |
| DOX | doxorubicin |
| EGFR | epithelial growth factor receptor |
| EPR | enhanced permeability and retention |
| EXO | exosomes |
| FA | folic acid |
| FA-NPs | folic acid (FA)-targeted paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles |
| FGFR1i | fibroblast growth factor receptor1-inhibitor |
| GA-AuNPs | gum arabic encapsulated gold nanoparticles |
| GNSbs | gold nano-sesame beads |
| GQDs | graphene quantum dots |
| GSH | glutathione |
| HA | hyaluronic acid |
| HIF-1α | hypoxia inducible factor-1 α |
| H-MnO2 | hollow mesoporous MnO2 |
| ISG | in situ gel |
| LPC NPs | lipid-platinum chloride nanoparticles |
| MDR | multidrug resistance |
| MMP-9 | matrix metallopeptidase 9 |
| MSC | mesenchymal stromal cell |
| MSC-EXO | mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes |
| MSN | mesoporous silica nanoparticles |
| nano-SHAP | hydroxyapatite nanoparticles |
| NF-κB | nuclear factor-κB |
| NIR | near-infrared |
| NPs | nanoparticles |
| NTP | non-thermal plasma |
| OSCC | oral squamous cell carcinoma |
| PCA | polycarbonate |
| PD-L1 | programmed cell death protein ligand 1 |
| PDT | photodynamic therapy |
| PEG | polyethylene glycol |
| PhCsNPs | phloretin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles |
| PLA | polylactic acid |
| PLGA | Poly (d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) |
| PtNCP | platinum nanocomposite |
| PTT | photonic hyperthermal therapy |
| PTX | paclitaxel |
| RENP | rare earth nanoparticle |
| ROS | reactive oxygen species |
| S-CD | sulfur-doped carbon dots |
| SDT | sonodynamic therapy |
| SIM | simvastatin |
| SPION | superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles |
| TSCC | tongue squamous cell carcinoma |
| UCN | upconversion nanoparticles |
| ZA | zoledronic acid |
| γδ TDE | γδ T cell-derived extracellular vesicles |
| 5-FU | 5-fluorouracil |
References
- Abdel Hamid H. M., Darwish Z. E., Elsheikh S. M., Mourad G. M., Donia H. M., Afifi M. M. (2021). Following cytotoxic nanoconjugates from injection to halting the cell cycle machinery and its therapeutic implications in oral cancer. BMC Cancer 21 (1), 170. 10.1186/s12885-021-07849-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abed A., Derakhshan M., Karimi M., Shirazinia M., Mahjoubin-Tehran M., Homayonfal M., et al. (2022). Platinum nanoparticles in biomedicine: Preparation, anti-cancer activity, and drug delivery vehicles. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 797804. 10.3389/fphar.2022.797804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Afrasiabi M., Seydi E., Rahimi S., Tahmasebi G., Jahanbani J., Pourahmad J. (2021). The selective toxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by targeting their mitochondria. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 35 (6), 1–8. 10.1002/jbt.22769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arias L. S., Pessan J. P., Vieira A. P. M., Lima T. M. T., Delbem A. C. B., Monteiro D. R. (2018). Iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications: A perspective on synthesis, drugs, antimicrobial activity, and toxicity. Antibiotics 7 (2), 46. 10.3390/antibiotics7020046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Batrakova E. V., Kim M. S. (2015). Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery. J. Control Release 219, 396–405. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bharadwaj R., Sahu B. P., Haloi J., Laloo D., Barooah P., Keppen C., et al. (2019). Combinatorial therapeutic approach for treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Artif. Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 47 (1), 572–585. 10.1080/21691401.2019.1573176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhat A. A., Yousuf P., Wani N. A., Rizwan A., Chauhan S. S., Siddiqi M. A., et al. (2021). Tumor microenvironment: An evil nexus promoting aggressive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and avenue for targeted therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6 (1), 12. 10.1038/s41392-020-00419-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bugshan A., Farooq I. (2020). Oral squamous cell carcinoma: Metastasis, potentially associated malignant disorders, etiology and recent advancements in diagnosis. F1000Res. 9, 229. 10.12688/f1000research.22941.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calixto G., Bernegossi J., Fonseca-Santos B., Chorilli M. (2014). Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for treatment of oral cancer: A review. Int. J. Nanomedicine 9, 3719–3735. 10.2147/IJN.S61670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty S., Suresh T. N. R., Mohiyuddin A. S. (2023). Role of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in predicting lymph node metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cureus 15 (1), e33495. 10.7759/cureus.33495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charbe N. B., Amnerkar N. D., Ramesh B., Tambuwala M. M., Bakshi H. A., Aljabali A. A. A., et al. (2020). Small interfering RNA for cancer treatment: Overcoming hurdles in delivery. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 10 (11), 2075–2109. 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J., Zhu Z., Pan Q., Bai Y., Yu M., Zhou Y. (2023). Targeted therapy of oral squamous cell carcinoma with cancer cell membrane coated Co-fc nanoparticles via autophagy inhibition. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2300235. 10.1002/adfm.202300235 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L., Kong Q., Tian M., Zhang Q., Xia C., Deng C. (2023). Zn(0.4)Mg(0.6)Fe(2)O(4) nanoenzyme: A novel chemo-sensitizer for the chemotherapy treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Nanoscale Adv. 5 (3), 851–860. 10.1039/d2na00750a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen M. H., Chen M. H., Li C. Y., Tung F. I., Chen S. Y., Liu T. Y. (2021). Using gold-nanorod-filled mesoporous silica nanobeads for enhanced radiotherapy of oral squamous carcinoma. Nanomaterials 11 (9), 2235. 10.3390/nano11092235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X. J., Zhang X. Q., Tang M. X., Liu Q., Zhou G. (2020). Anti-PD-L1-modified and ATRA-loaded nanoparticles for immuno-treatment of oral dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Nanomedicine (Lond) 15 (10), 951–968. 10.2217/nnm-2019-0397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coelho J. F., Ferreira P. C., Alves P., Cordeiro R., Fonseca A. C., Gois J. R., et al. (2010). Drug delivery systems: Advanced technologies potentially applicable in personalized treatments. EPMA J. 1 (1), 164–209. 10.1007/s13167-010-0001-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai H., Yan H., Dong F., Zhang L., Du N., Sun L., et al. (2022). Tumor-targeted biomimetic nanoplatform precisely integrates photodynamic therapy and autophagy inhibition for collaborative treatment of oral cancer. Biomater. Sci. 10 (6), 1456–1469. 10.1039/d1bm01780b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Das R. K., Panda S., Bhol C. S., Bhutia S. K., Mohapatra S. (2019). N-doped carbon quantum dot (NCQD)-Deposited carbon capsules for synergistic fluorescence imaging and photothermal therapy of oral cancer. Langmuir 35 (47), 15320–15329. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Felice F., Cavallini C., Barlattani A., Tombolini M., Brugnoletti O., Tombolini V., et al. (2019). Nanotechnology in oral cavity carcinoma: Recent trends and treatment opportunities. Nanomater. (Basel) 9 (11), 1546. 10.3390/nano9111546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deshmukh V., Shekar K. (2021). “Oral squamous cell carcinoma: Diagnosis and treatment planning,” in Oral and maxillofacial surgery for the clinician. Editors Bonanthaya K., Panneerselvam E., Manuel S., Kumar V. V., Rai A. (Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; ), 1853–1867. [Google Scholar]
- Elsharkasy O. M., Nordin J. Z., Hagey D. W., de Jong O. G., Schiffelers R. M., Andaloussi S. E., et al. (2020). Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: Why and how?. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 159, 332–343. 10.1016/j.addr.2020.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enășescu D. A., Moisescu M. G., Imre M., Greabu M., Ripszky Totan A., Stanescu-Spinu I., et al. (2021). Lutein treatment effects on the redox status and metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in oral cancer squamous cells—are there therapeutical hopes?. Materials 14 (11), 2968. 10.3390/ma14112968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Endo K., Ueno T., Kondo S., Wakisaka N., Murono S., Ito M., et al. (2013). Tumor-targeted chemotherapy with the nanopolymer-based drug NC-6004 for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 104 (3), 369–374. 10.1111/cas.12079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Essawy M. M., El-Sheikh S. M., Raslan H. S., Ramadan H. S., Kang B., Talaat I. M., et al. (2021). Function of gold nanoparticles in oral cancer beyond drug delivery: Implications in cell apoptosis. Oral Dis. 27 (2), 251–265. 10.1111/odi.13551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan H. Y., Zhu Z. L., Zhang W. L., Yin Y. J., Tang Y. L., Liang X. H., et al. (2020). Light stimulus responsive nanomedicine in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 199, 112394. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan L., Wang J., Xia C., Zhang Q., Pu Y., Chen L., et al. (2020). Glutathione-sensitive and folate-targeted nanoparticles loaded with paclitaxel to enhance oral squamous cell carcinoma therapy. J. Mater Chem. B 8 (15), 3113–3122. 10.1039/c9tb02818h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gamal-Eldeen A. M., Baghdadi H. M., Afifi N. S., Ismail E. M., Alsanie W. F., Althobaiti F., et al. (2021). Gum Arabic-encapsulated gold nanoparticles modulate hypoxamiRs expression in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 17 (2), 111–121. 10.1007/s13273-021-00117-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gulland A. (2016). Oral cancer rates rise by two thirds. BMJ 355, i6369. 10.1136/bmj.i6369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gusti-Ngurah-Putu E. P., Huang L., Hsu Y. C. (2019). Effective combined photodynamic therapy with lipid platinum chloride nanoparticles therapies of oral squamous carcinoma tumor inhibition. J. Clin. Med. 8 (12), 2112. 10.3390/jcm8122112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ketabat F., Pundir M., Mohabatpour F., Lobanova L., Koutsopoulos S., Hadjiiski L., et al. (2019). Controlled drug delivery systems for oral cancer treatment-current status and future perspectives. Pharmaceutics 11 (7), 302. 10.3390/pharmaceutics11070302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitamura N., Sento S., Yoshizawa Y., Sasabe E., Kudo Y., Yamamoto T. (2021). Current trends and future prospects of molecular targeted therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (1), 240. 10.3390/ijms22010240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurakula M., Naveen N. R. (2020). In situ gel loaded with chitosan-coated simvastatin nanoparticles: Promising delivery for effective anti-proliferative activity against tongue carcinoma. Mar. Drugs 18 (4), 201. 10.3390/md18040201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lang L., Lam T., Chen A., Jensen C., Duncan L., Kong F. C., et al. (2020). Circumventing AKT-associated radioresistance in oral cancer by novel nanoparticle-encapsulated capivasertib. Cells 9 (3), 533. 10.3390/cells9030533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Lu S., Liang X., Cao B., Wang S., Jiang J., et al. (2019). γδTDEs: An efficient delivery system for miR-138 with anti-tumoral and immunostimulatory roles on oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 14, 101–113. 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Q., Liu X., Yan W., Chen Y. (2020). Antitumor effect of poly lactic acid nanoparticles loaded with cisplatin and chloroquine on the oral squamous cell carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY) 13 (2), 2593–2603. 10.18632/aging.202297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Q., Zhou R., Xie Y., Li Y., Chen Y., Cai X. (2020). Sulphur-doped carbon dots as a highly efficient nano-photodynamic agent against oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Prolif. 53 (4), e12786. 10.1111/cpr.12786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin B., Wu J., Wang Y., Sun S., Yuan Y., Tao X., et al. (2021). Peptide functionalized upconversion/NIR II luminescent nanoparticles for targeted imaging and therapy of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomater. Sci. 9 (3), 1000–1007. 10.1039/d0bm01737j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Shi J., Zhu B., Xu Q. (2020). Development of a multifunctional gold nanoplatform for combined chemo-photothermal therapy against oral cancer. Nanomedicine (Lond) 15 (7), 661–676. 10.2217/nnm-2019-0415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucky S. S., Idris N. M., Huang K., Kim J., Li Z., Thong P. S., et al. (2016). In vivo biocompatibility, biodistribution and therapeutic efficiency of titania coated upconversion nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy of solid oral cancers. Theranostics 6 (11), 1844–1865. 10.7150/thno.15088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mabrouk A. A., El-Mezayen N. S., Tadros M. I., El-Gazayerly O. N., El-Refaie W. M. (2023). Novel mucoadhesive celecoxib-loaded cubosomal sponges: Anticancer potential and regulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 182, 62–80. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mariadoss A. V. A., Vinayagam R., Senthilkumar V., Paulpandi M., Murugan K., Xu B., et al. (2019). Phloretin loaded chitosan nanoparticles augments the pH-dependent mitochondrial-mediated intrinsic apoptosis in human oral cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 130, 997–1008. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montenegro M. F., Sundqvist M. L., Nihlen C., Hezel M., Carlstrom M., Weitzberg E., et al. (2016). Profound differences between humans and rodents in the ability to concentrate salivary nitrate: Implications for translational research. Redox Biol. 10, 206–210. 10.1016/j.redox.2016.10.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mukherjee D., Dash P., Ramadass B., Mangaraj M. (2022). Nanocurcumin in oral squamous cancer cells and its efficacy as a chemo-adjuvant. Cureus 14 (5), e24678. 10.7759/cureus.24678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murata T., Kutsuna T., Kurohara K., Shimizu K., Tomeoku A., Arai N. (2018). Evaluation of a new hydroxyapatite nanoparticle as a drug delivery system to oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Anticancer Res. 38 (12), 6715–6720. 10.21873/anticanres.13040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura Y., Mochida A., Choyke P. L., Kobayashi H. (2016). Nanodrug delivery: Is the enhanced permeability and retention effect sufficient for curing cancer?. Bioconjug Chem. 27 (10), 2225–2238. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nandini D. B., Rao R. S., Hosmani J., Khan S., Patil S., Awan K. H. (2020). Novel therapies in the management of oral cancer: An update. Dis. Mon. 66 (12), 101036. 10.1016/j.disamonth.2020.101036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ortega A., da Silva A. B., da Costa L. M., Zatta K. C., Onzi G. R., da Fonseca F. N., et al. (2023). Thermosensitive and mucoadhesive hydrogel containing curcumin-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules coated with chitosan for the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 13 (2), 642–657. 10.1007/s13346-022-01227-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park J., Jang Y.-S., Choi J.-H., Ryu M., Kim G.-C., Byun J. H., et al. (2021). Anticancer efficacy of nonthermal plasma therapy combined with PD-L1 antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles on oral squamous cell carcinoma. Appl. Sci. 11 (10), 4559. 10.3390/app11104559 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pereira-Silva M., Santos A. C., Conde J., Hoskins C., Concheiro A., Alvarez-Lorenzo C., et al. (2020). Biomimetic cancer cell membrane-coated nanosystems as next-generation cancer therapies. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 17 (11), 1515–1518. 10.1080/17425247.2020.1813109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pornpitchanarong C., Rojanarata T., Opanasopit P., Ngawhirunpat T., Patrojanasophon P. (2020). Catechol-modified chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles as a new avenue for local delivery of doxorubicin to oral cancer cells. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 196, 111279. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu Y., Sun J., Qiu J., Chen G., Wang X., Mu Y., et al. (2020). Antitumor activity of cabazitaxel and MSC-TRAIL derived extracellular vesicles in drug-resistant oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Manag. Res. 12, 10809–10820. 10.2147/CMAR.S277324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ran J., Liu T., Song C., Wei Z., Tang C., Cao Z., et al. (2023). Rhythm mild-temperature photothermal therapy enhancing immunogenic cell death response in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Adv. Healthc. Mater 12 (6), e2202360. 10.1002/adhm.202202360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rizvi S. A. A., Saleh A. M. (2018). Applications of nanoparticle systems in drug delivery technology. Saudi Pharm. J. 26 (1), 64–70. 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.10.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sachdeva A., Dhawan D., Jain G. K., Yerer M. B., Collignon T. E., Tewari D., et al. (2022). Novel strategies for the bioavailability augmentation and efficacy improvement of natural products in oral cancer. Cancers (Basel) 15 (1), 268. 10.3390/cancers15010268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sah A. K., Vyas A., Suresh P. K., Gidwani B. (2018). Application of nanocarrier-based drug delivery system in treatment of oral cancer. Artif. Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 46 (4), 650–657. 10.1080/21691401.2017.1373284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sepantafar M., Maheronnaghsh R., Mohammadi H., Radmanesh F., Hasani-sadrabadi M. M., Ebrahimi M., et al. (2017). Engineered hydrogels in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Trends Biotechnol. 35 (11), 1074–1087. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi S., Wang Y., Wang B., Chen Q., Wan G., Yang X., et al. (2020). Homologous-targeting biomimetic nanoparticles for photothermal therapy and Nrf2-siRNA amplified photodynamic therapy against oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Chem. Eng. J. 388, 124268. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124268 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shi X. L., Li Y., Zhao L. M., Su L. W., Ding G. (2019). Delivery of MTH1 inhibitor (TH287) and MDR1 siRNA via hyaluronic acid-based mesoporous silica nanoparticles for oral cancers treatment. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 173, 599–606. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.09.076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Jemal A. (2020). Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70 (1), 7–30. 10.3322/caac.21590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh P., Pandit S., Mokkapati V. R. S. S., Garg A., Ravikumar V., Mijakovic I. (2018). Gold nanoparticles in diagnostics and therapeutics for human cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (7), 1979. 10.3390/ijms19071979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava S., Gupta S., Mohammad S., Ahmad I. (2019). Development of alpha-tocopherol surface-modified targeted delivery of 5-fluorouracil-loaded poly-D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles against oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 15 (3), 480–490. 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_263_18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R. L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., et al. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71 (3), 209–249. 10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Surer S. I., Elcitepe T. B., Akcay D., Daskin E., Calibasi Kocal G., Arican Alicikus Z., et al. (2021). A promising, novel radiosensitizer nanodrug complex for oral cavity cancer: Cetuximab and cisplatin-conjugated gold nanoparticles. Balk. Med. J. 38 (5), 278–286. 10.5152/balkanmedj.2021.21013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sushnitha M., Evangelopoulos M., Tasciotti E., Taraballi F. (2020). Cell membrane-based biomimetic nanoparticles and the immune system: Immunomodulatory interactions to therapeutic applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 627. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka M., Okinaga T., Iwanaga K., Matsuo K., Toyono T., Sasaguri M., et al. (2019). Anticancer effect of novel platinum nanocomposite beads on oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. J. Biomed. Mater Res. B Appl. Biomater. 107 (7), 2281–2287. 10.1002/jbm.b.34320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang F., Li C., Cheng J., Yuan Z. (2016). Recent advances on inorganic nanoparticle-based cancer therapeutic agents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13 (12), 1182. 10.3390/ijerph13121182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Zhao Q., Han N., Bai L., Li J., Liu J., et al. (2015). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Nanomedicine 11 (2), 313–327. 10.1016/j.nano.2014.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiklander O. P., Nordin J. Z., O'Loughlin A., Gustafsson Y., Corso G., Mager I., et al. (2015). Extracellular vesicle in vivo biodistribution is determined by cell source, route of administration and targeting. J. Extracell. Vesicles 4, 26316. 10.3402/jev.v4.26316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xia W., Tao Z., Zhu B., Zhang W., Liu C., Chen S., et al. (2021). Targeted delivery of drugs and genes using polymer nanocarriers for cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (17), 9118. 10.3390/ijms22179118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang M., Luo Q., Chen X., Chen F. (2021). Bitter melon derived extracellular vesicles enhance the therapeutic effects and reduce the drug resistance of 5-fluorouracil on oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Nanobiotechnology 19 (1), 259. 10.1186/s12951-021-00995-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu A. J., Choi J. S., Swanson M. S., Kokot N. C., Brown T. N., Yan G., et al. (2019). Association of race/ethnicity, stage, and survival in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A seer study. OTO Open 3 (4), 2473974X19891126. 10.1177/2473974X19891126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yunxia L., Wenjuan D., Zhiguang F., Huanhuan W., Jiexin W., Yuan L., et al. (2018). pH-Responsive polycarbonate copolymer-based nanoparticles for targeted anticancer drug delivery. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 34, 1041–1050. 10.1007/s40242-018-8147-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang M., Liang J., Yang Y., Liang H., Jia H., Li D. (2020). Current trends of targeted drug delivery for oral cancer therapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 618931. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.618931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Q., Xiao Q., Yin H., Xia X., Pu Y., He Z., et al. (2020). Milk-exosome based pH/light sensitive drug system to enhance anticancer activity against oral squamous cell carcinoma. RSC Adv. 1 (47), 28314–28323. 10.1039/d0ra05630h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X., Li H., Yi C., Chen G., Li Y., Zhou Y., et al. (2020). Host immune response triggered by graphene quantum-dot-mediated photodynamic therapy for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Nanomedicine 15, 9627–9638. 10.2147/IJN.S276153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Z.-H., Liang S.-Y., Zhao T.-C., Chen X.-Z., Cao X.-K., Qi M., et al. (2021). Overcoming chemotherapy resistance using pH-sensitive hollow MnO2 nanoshells that target the hypoxic tumor microenvironment of metastasized oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Nanobiotechnology 19 (1), 157. 10.1186/s12951-021-00901-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuo J., Huo M., Wang L., Li J., Chen Y., Xiong P. (2020). Photonic hyperthermal and sonodynamic nanotherapy targeting oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Mater Chem. B 8, 9084–9093. 10.1039/d0tb01089h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

