Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 May 18:2023.05.18.541325. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.05.18.541325

Dynamic nuclear polarization illuminates key protein-lipid interactions in the native bacterial cell envelope

James E Kent 1, Bryce E Ackermann 2, Galia T Debelouchina 2, Francesca M Marassi 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC10245764  PMID: 37292594

Abstract

Elucidating the structure and interactions of proteins in native environments has become a fundamental goal of structural biology. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is well suited for this task but often suffers from low sensitivity, especially in complex biological settings. Here, we use a sensitivity-enhancement technique called dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) to overcome this challenge. We apply DNP to capture the membrane interactions of the outer membrane protein Ail, a key component of the host invasion pathway of Yersinia pestis. We show that the DNP-enhanced NMR spectra of Ail in native bacterial cell envelopes are well resolved and enriched in correlations that are invisible in conventional solid-state NMR experiments. Furthermore, we demonstrate the ability of DNP to capture elusive interactions between the protein and the surrounding lipopolysaccharide layer. Our results support a model where the extracellular loop arginine residues remodel the membrane environment, a process that is crucial for host invasion and pathogenesis.


Understanding how proteins interact with their environments at the atomic level is critical for gaining mechanistic biomedical insights. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is exceptionally well suited for this purpose as NMR signals are highly susceptible to the local environment of their corresponding sites, and therefore, capable of reporting on even very weak intermolecular interactions. Taking advantage of these capabilities, the growing fields of in situ and in cell NMR (1, 2) present new opportunities for examining protein structure and interactions in native biological contexts, including the investigation of protein aggregation in cellular lysates (3), the characterization of protein function in native membranes (46), and the description of protein-drug interactions in cells (7). Despite these advances, however, a known limitation of NMR is its inherently low signal intensity. The extensive signal averaging times required to accumulate sufficient signal over noise can be impractical for complex samples such as native membranes and cells, and can compromise sample stability. Moreover, signals from sites undergoing chemical or dynamic exchange on the millisecond time scale are difficult to detect. These problems can be particularly limiting for solid-state NMR spectroscopy, which still predominantly relies on the observation of low sensitivity nuclei such as 13C and 15N, and can be sensitive to molecular motions that interfere with the recoupling and decoupling schemes employed in the experiments (8, 9).

The development of high field Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP) for solid-state NMR spectroscopy (10), reviewed in ref. (1113), provides a key avenue for overcoming these challenges. In a DNP experiment, polarization is transferred from unpaired electron spins to nuclei, typically resulting in enhancements of 10–150 for biological samples. To this end, samples are doped with stable biradicals, and experiments are performed at 90–100 K under magic angle spinning (MAS) conditions. DNP has been used to investigate a wide range of systems, including amyloid fibrils (3, 14), nucleic acids and chromatin polymers (1517), membrane-embedded proteins (4, 18, 19), and intact cells (2022). Here, we use DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy to investigate the lipid interactions of the protein Ail, a virulence factor of the plague pathogen Yersinia pestis, in intact bacterial cell envelopes.

Previously, we showed that the Yersinia pestis surface protein Ail can be expressed in the outer membrane of E. coli cells for in situ solid-state NMR structural studies at atomic-resolution (5). The solid-state NMR spectra from isolated bacterial cell envelopes (including both inner and outer membranes, and interleaving peptidoglycan layer) reflect the eight-stranded β-barrel structure of Ail, and reveal sites that interact with bacterial outer membrane components and human serum factors. Moreover, since Ail expression confers some of its key virulence phenotypes to E. coli, the structural data from these samples can be correlated with activity. Our previous NMR studies of Ail with bacterial cell envelopes, lipid nanodiscs, and liposomes, together with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and microbiology assays, all point to specific interactions between key basic sidechains of Ail with the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) lipids of the bacterial outer membrane (5, 23). These interactions are important for virulence as in Y. pestis bacteria, Ail and LPS have co-evolved to confer resistance to human innate immunity, and act cooperatively to enhance pathogen survival in serum, antibiotic resistance, and cell envelope integrity (2427). Nevertheless, the NMR signals from the LPS binding sites of Ail have been challenging to detect and this limits our understanding of the precise molecular mechanism for this interaction. In this study, we show that the DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR spectra of Ail in bacterial membranes provide direct evidence of contacts between key Arg sidechains of Ail and the outer membrane LPS.

To examine the potential of enhancing the NMR signals from Ail, in situ, using DNP, we used a 15N/13C labeled Ail sample in intact E. coli cell envelopes. The sample was prepared, as previously described (5), by first growing cells in unlabeled media and then transferring them to isotopically labeled media supplemented with both rifampicin and IPTG. Rifampicin halts transcription of the E. coli genome and suppresses endogenous protein production, while IPTG induces Ail expression (28). This protocol of targeted isotopic labeling is critical for suppressing background NMR signals from other cellular components and for yielding high-resolution solid-state NMR spectra of Ail in situ (5). We then doped the sample with 10 mM of the nitroxide-based biradical AMUPol, and cryoprotected the sample in a mixture of 60% glycerol-d8, 35% D2O, and 5% H2O. DNP experiments were performed at 600 MHz and 100 K, with 12 kHz MAS frequency.

The 15N-filtered two-dimensional 15N/13C correlation NCA spectrum acquired with DNP at 100K also exhibits significant signal enhancement. It compares very favorably with its counterpart acquired at 278K, notwithstanding the line broadening, with numerous identifiable signals that could be assigned based on their 278K assignments (Fig. 2). Twenty Gly peaks are expected based on the amino acid sequence of Ail and additional signals are observed in the 15N/13CA spectral region associated with Gly (13C: 42–48 ppm; 15N: 101–121 ppm), with one signal (13C: 44.5 ppm; 15N: 121.0 ppm) tentatively assignable to Gly19 in the first extracellular loop of Ail, based on comparison with resonance assignments made in decylphosphocholine micelles (2931). These results illustrate the greater amount of information that is available from NMR spectra obtained at low temperature. Moreover, the observation of discrete, resolvable peaks reflects relative order, within narrow conformational ensembles, for their corresponding protein sites rather than high conformational disorder.

Figure 2. Two-dimensional NCA spectrum of 15N,13C-Ail in E. coli cell envelopes acquired with DNP (green).

Figure 2.

Resolved assigned peaks are marked. Asterisks denote new unassigned peak observed with DNP. The spectrum from Ail in E. coli cell envelopes (black) acquired without DNP is shown for comparison and was described previously (5).

The combined effects of DNP and low temperature also yield a significant enhancement of the signals from Arg sidechains (13C: 40–45 ppm; 15N: 80–90 ppm) which are observable in the NCA spectra due to the similarity of the Nε-Cδ and N-Cα spin groups (Fig. 2). Eight Arg Nε- Cδ signals are visible, in line with the eight Arg residues in the Ail sequence. Of these, three are buried in the barrel interior near the intracellular membrane surface (R34, R80 and R155), while the others are located at the extracellular membrane surface (R14, R27, R51, R52, R110) where they can interact with LPS polar groups. Here too, the observation of discrete signals at low temperature indicates that their corresponding Arg sites must each adopt a relatively ordered conformational state, since the freezing out of multiple disordered conformational states for each site would be expected to result in extensive line broadening and loss of signal intensity.

To examine the potential of Ail-LPS contacts as a source of conformational order, we acquired two-dimensional NHHC spectra (32) where through-space contacts between 1H bound to 13C and 15N nuclei are observed as correlations between their respective 13C and 15N nuclei (Fig. 3A). We recorded spectra with DNP, at 100K, for Ail(+) and control Ail(−) cell envelopes. Overall, in the Ail(−) cell envelope sample, signals decrease for the amide nitrogen (15N: ~120 ppm) and Arg sidechain regions (15N: ~70 – 80 ppm), while the signals for the Lys side-chains remain essentially the same (15N: ~30 ppm). The dramatic difference in signal intensity for the Lys and Arg regions can also be seen in one dimensional 13C slices extracted from the spectra (Fig. 3B, C). A closer inspection of the Arg region reveals that much of this signal reflects intra-residue contacts along the sidechain (Cα, ~55 ppm; Cβ, 32 ppm; Cγ, 28 ppm; Cδ, 44 ppm). Ηowever, the 13C signals observed between 62–78 ppm are consistent with the chemical shifts of the peptidoglycan layer and the lipid A portion (glucosamine, 55–100 ppm; carbons from the acyl chains, 25–70 ppm) or the core sugars of LPS (33). The unique presence of these correlations in the Ail(+) sample strongly suggests that they reflect interactions between Arg residues on the protein and the outer leaflet LPS. On the other hand, the negligible difference for the characteristic Lys Nη signals between the Ail(+) and control Ail(−) suggests that interactions between Lys sidechains and LPS are not likely. This is also consistent with our previous solution NMR and MD simulation data, which suggest key roles for Arg side-chains in establishing specific hydrogen bonds with LPS (23). Finally, the decrease in the amide nitrogen signals, which is uniform throughout the whole chemical shift range, most likely reflects the reduced protein content of the control Ail(−) samples.

Figure 3. Two-dimensional NHHC spectra acquired with DNP.

Figure 3.

(A-C) Spectra were acquired for (15N,13C)-Ail(+) (green) or (15N,13C)-Ail(−) (pink) E. coli cell envelopes. Spectral regions of correlations are marked (gold boxes). One-dimensional slices (B, C) were taken at specific 15N chemical shifts (dashed lines) of sidechain N from Arg and Lys. (D) Snapshot of Ail obtained after 1.5 μs of MD simulation in a Y. pestis outer membrane showing that Arg27 in the LPS-recognition motif establishes multiple interactions with lipid A of an LPS molecule. MD simulations were described previously (23).

In summary, we have demonstrated that DNP-enhanced NMR spectroscopy, together with selective labeling strategies, can be used to characterize proteins in their native membrane context with high efficiency and specificity. Despite the line broadening that typically accompanies protein spectra at low temperatures, the spectra of the Ail outer membrane protein are of sufficient quality to allow the identification of many resolved cross peaks and the observation of new peaks that are absent in room temperature spectra. Of note, the new peaks that appear in the Gly and Arg regions of the spectra, for example, display narrow linewidths, suggesting that these residues have well defined conformations at low temperature. The sensitivity enhancement afforded by DNP, on the other hand, has allowed us to observe potential interactions between the Ail Arg e sidechains and LPS of the outer membrane layer, indicating that these residues can play a fundamental role in the restructuring of the lipid environment around the protein. These results showcase the ability of DNP-enhanced NMR spectroscopy to capture elusive interactions in native samples and to expand the size and complexity of biological systems that can be characterized at atomic resolution. We look forward to future studies that extend these capabilities to Ail in whole cells, and to illuminating its interactions with relevant human host proteins.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (134.6KB, pdf)

Figure 1. DNP signal enhancement of the 15N and 13C MAS solid-state NMR spectra of Ail in E. coli cell envelopes.

Figure 1.

(A-C) One dimensional spectra acquired with (A) 1H-15N CP, (B) 1H-13C CP, or (C) 1H-15N-13C double CP, and with (green) or without (black) microwave irradiation. Signal enhancement factors (εon/off) were measured as the ratio of signal intensity observed with and without microwave irradiation. (D, E) Two dimensional 13C/13C correlation spectrum of Ail in E. coli cell envelopes acquired with DNP (green). The spectra from Ail in E. coli cell envelopes (black) and Ail in liposomes (red), acquired without DNP are shown for comparison and were described previously (5). The yellow rectangle marks LPS-related correlations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

The authors thank Marassi and Debelouchina lab group members for helpful discussions.

FUNDING SOURCES:

This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R35 GM 118186 to F.F.M. and R35 GM138382 to G.T.D.) and the National Science Foundation (NSF MRI CHE 2019066 to G.T.D.).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT: Methods are provided in the Supporting Information.

REFERENCES:

  • (1).Theillet F. X. (2022) In-Cell Structural Biology by NMR: The Benefits of the Atomic Scale, Chemical reviews 122, 9497–9570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Luchinat E., Cremonini M., and Banci L. (2022) Radio Signals from Live Cells: The Coming of Age of In-Cell Solution NMR, Chemical reviews 122, 9267–9306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Frederick K. K., Michaelis V. K., Corzilius B., Ong T. C., Jacavone A. C., Griffin R. G., and Lindquist S. (2015) Sensitivity-enhanced NMR reveals alterations in protein structure by cellular milieus, Cell 163, 620–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Kaplan M., Narasimhan S., de Heus C., Mance D., van Doorn S., Houben K., Popov-Celeketic D., Damman R., Katrukha E. A., Jain P., Geerts W. J. C., Heck A. J. R., Folkers G. E., Kapitein L. C., Lemeer S., van Bergen En Henegouwen P. M. P., and Baldus M. (2016) EGFR Dynamics Change during Activation in Native Membranes as Revealed by NMR, Cell 167, 1241–1251 e1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Kent J. E., Fujimoto L. M., Shin K., Singh C., Yao Y., Park S. H., Opella S. J., Plano G. V., and Marassi F. M. (2021) Correlating the Structure and Activity of Y. pestis Ail in a Bacterial Cell Envelope, Biophys. J. 120, 453–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Takahashi H., Ayala I., Bardet M., De Paepe G., Simorre J. P., and Hediger S. (2013) Solid-state NMR on bacterial cells: selective cell wall signal enhancement and resolution improvement using dynamic nuclear polarization, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5105–5110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Luchinat E., and Banci L. (2022) In-cell NMR: From target structure and dynamics to drug screening, Curr Opin Struct Biol 74, 102374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Bajaj V. S., van der Wel P. C., and Griffin R. G. (2009) Observation of a low-temperature, dynamically driven structural transition in a polypeptide by solid-state NMR spectroscopy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 118–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Ni Q. Z., Markhasin E., Can T. V., Corzilius B., Tan K. O., Barnes A. B., Daviso E., Su Y., Herzfeld J., and Griffin R. G. (2017) Peptide and Protein Dynamics and Low-Temperature/DNP Magic Angle Spinning NMR, J Phys Chem B 121, 4997–5006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Hall D. A., Maus D. C., Gerfen G. J., Inati S. J., Becerra L. R., Dahlquist F. W., and Griffin R. G. (1997) Polarization-enhanced NMR spectroscopy of biomolecules in frozen solution, Science 276, 930–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Chow W. Y., De Paepe G., and Hediger S. (2022) Biomolecular and Biological Applications of Solid-State NMR with Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhancement, Chem Rev 122, 9795–9847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Biedenbander T., Aladin V., Saeidpour S., and Corzilius B. (2022) Dynamic Nuclear Polarization for Sensitivity Enhancement in Biomolecular Solid-State NMR, Chem. Rev. 122, 9738–9794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Jaudzems K., Polenova T., Pintacuda G., Oschkinat H., and Lesage A. (2019) DNP NMR of biomolecular assemblies, J. Struct. Biol. 206, 90–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Bahri S., Silvers R., Michael B., Jaudzems K., Lalli D., Casano G., Ouari O., Lesage A., Pintacuda G., Linse S., and Griffin R. G. (2022) (1)H detection and dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced NMR of Abeta(1–42) fibrils, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Daube D., Vogel M., Suess B., and Corzilius B. (2019) Dynamic nuclear polarization on a hybridized hammerhead ribozyme: An explorative study of RNA folding and direct DNP with a paramagnetic metal ion cofactor, Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 101, 21–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Conroy D. W., Xu Y., Shi H., Gonzalez Salguero N., Purusottam R. N., Shannon M. D., Al-Hashimi H. M., and Jaroniec C. P. (2022) Probing Watson-Crick and Hoogsteen base pairing in duplex DNA using dynamic nuclear polarization solid-state NMR spectroscopy, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119, e2200681119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Elathram N., Ackermann B. E., and Debelouchina G. T. (2022) DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy of chromatin polymers, J Magn Reson Open 10–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Bajaj V. S., Mak-Jurkauskas M. L., Belenky M., Herzfeld J., and Griffin R. G. (2009) Functional and shunt states of bacteriorhodopsin resolved by 250 GHz dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 9244–9249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Kaplan M., Cukkemane A., van Zundert G. C., Narasimhan S., Daniels M., Mance D., Waksman G., Bonvin A. M., Fronzes R., Folkers G. E., and Baldus M. (2015) Probing a cell-embedded megadalton protein complex by DNP-supported solid-state NMR, Nat Methods 12, 649–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Narasimhan S., Scherpe S., Lucini Paioni A., van der Zwan J., Folkers G. E., Ovaa H., and Baldus M. (2019) DNP-Supported Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy of Proteins Inside Mammalian Cells, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Schlagnitweit J., Friebe Sandoz S., Jaworski A., Guzzetti I., Aussenac F., Carbajo R. J., Chiarparin E., Pell A. J., and Petzold K. (2019) Observing an Antisense Drug Complex in Intact Human Cells by in-Cell NMR Spectroscopy, Chembiochem 20, 2474–2478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Ghosh R., Xiao Y., Kragelj J., and Frederick K. K. (2021) In-Cell Sensitivity-Enhanced NMR of Intact Viable Mammalian Cells, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 18454–18466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Singh C., Lee H., Tian Y., Schesser Bartra S., Hower S., Fujimoto L. M., Yao Y., Ivanov S. A., Shaikhutdinova R. Z., Anisimov A. P., Plano G. V., Im W., and Marassi F. M. (2020) Mutually constructive roles of Ail and LPS in Yersinia pestis serum survival, Mol. Microbiol. 114, 510–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Parkhill J., Wren B. W., Thomson N. R., Titball R. W., Holden M. T., Prentice M. B., Sebaihia M., James K. D., Churcher C., Mungall K. L., Baker S., Basham D., Bentley S. D., Brooks K., Cerdeno-Tarraga A. M., Chillingworth T., Cronin A., Davies R. M., Davis P., Dougan G., Feltwell T., Hamlin N., Holroyd S., Jagels K., Karlyshev A. V., Leather S., Moule S., Oyston P. C., Quail M., Rutherford K., Simmonds M., Skelton J., Stevens K., Whitehead S., and Barrell B. G. (2001) Genome sequence of Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague, Nature 413, 523–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Deng W., Burland V., Plunkett G. 3rd, Boutin A., Mayhew G. F., Liss P., Perna N. T., Rose D. J., Mau B., Zhou S., Schwartz D. C., Fetherston J. D., Lindler L. E., Brubaker R. R., Plano G. V., Straley S. C., McDonough K. A., Nilles M. L., Matson J. S., Blattner F. R., and Perry R. D. (2002) Genome sequence of Yersinia pestis KIM, Journal of Bacteriology 184, 4601–4611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Knirel Y. A., and Anisimov A. P. (2012) Lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia pestis, the Cause of Plague: Structure, Genetics, Biological Properties, Acta Naturae 4, 46–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Kolodziejek A. M., Hovde C. J., and Minnich S. A. (2012) Yersinia pestis Ail: multiple roles of a single protein, Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2, 103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Almeida F. C., Amorim G. C., Moreau V. H., Sousa V. O., Creazola A. T., Americo T. A., Pais A. P., Leite A., Netto L. E., Giordano R. J., and Valente A. P. (2001) Selectively labeling the heterologous protein in Escherichia coli for NMR studies: a strategy to speed up NMR spectroscopy, J Magn Reson 148, 142–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Ding Y., Fujimoto L. M., Yao Y., Plano G. V., and Marassi F. M. (2015) Influence of the lipid membrane environment on structure and activity of the outer membrane protein Ail from Yersinia pestis, Biochim Biophys Acta 1848, 712–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Marassi F. M., Ding Y., Schwieters C. D., Tian Y., and Yao Y. (2015) Backbone structure of Yersinia pestis Ail determined in micelles by NMR-restrained simulated annealing with implicit membrane solvation, J. Biomol. NMR 63, 59–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Dutta S. K., Yao Y., and Marassi F. M. (2017) Structural Insights into the Yersinia pestis Outer Membrane Protein Ail in Lipid Bilayers, J Phys Chem B 121, 7561–7570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Lange A., Luca S., and Baldus M. (2002) Structural constraints from proton-mediated rare-spin correlation spectroscopy in rotating solids, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 9704–9705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Laguri C., Silipo A., Martorana A. M., Schanda P., Marchetti R., Polissi A., Molinaro A., and Simorre J.-P. (2018) Solid State NMR Studies of Intact Lipopolysaccharide Endotoxin, ACS chemical biology 13, 2106–2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (134.6KB, pdf)

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES