Abstract
Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is one of the most common pharmaco-resistant epilepsies in adults. While hippocampal pathology is the hallmark of this condition, emerging evidence indicates that brain alterations extend beyond the mesiotemporal epicenter and affect macroscale brain function and cognition. We studied macroscale functional reorganization in TLE, explored structural substrates, and examined cognitive associations. We investigated a multisite cohort of 95 patients with pharmaco-resistant TLE and 95 healthy controls using state-of-the-art multimodal 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We quantified macroscale functional topographic organization using connectome dimensionality reduction techniques and estimated directional functional flow using generative models of effective connectivity. We observed atypical functional topographies in patients with TLE relative to controls, manifesting as reduced functional differentiation between sensory/motor networks and transmodal systems such as the default mode network, with peak alterations in bilateral temporal and ventromedial prefrontal cortices. TLE-related topographic changes were consistent in all three included sites and reflected reductions in hierarchical flow patterns between cortical systems. Integration of parallel multimodal MRI data indicated that these findings were independent of TLE-related cortical grey matter atrophy, but mediated by microstructural alterations in the superficial white matter immediately beneath the cortex. The magnitude of functional perturbations was robustly associated with behavioral markers of memory function. Overall, this work provides converging evidence for macroscale functional imbalances, contributing microstructural alterations, and their associations with cognitive dysfunction in TLE.
Keywords: temporal lobe epilepsy, multi-site, multimodal, gradient, effectivity connectivity, memory
Introduction
Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is among the most prevalent pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies in adults.1 Commonly conceptualized as a “focal” epilepsy with a mesiotemporal epicenter,2 increasing histopathological and neuroimaging evidence highlights the presence of widespread structural and functional alterations.3–7 These findings are in line with contemporary theories of brain pathology indicating that disease-related alterations remain rarely confined to a single locus, but instead often affect interconnected networks.8 Thus, a detailed understanding of brain network organization is crucial to fully capture TLE-related pathology at a system level. Single9,10 and multisite3 studies have firmly established structural network reorganization in TLE, both at the level of grey and white matter structural compromise. On the other hand, despite prior studies showing aberrant intrinsic functional connectivity based on resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) at the level of single regions or networks,11,12 large-sale functional reorganization in the condition remains less well understood. As macroscale imbalances compromise brain health, psychosocial function, but also wellbeing,13–15 there is need to comprehensively assess functional connectome architecture in TLE.
Brain connectivity is inherently high-dimensional (defined at the level of inter-regional edges), which challenges visualization and synthesis of disease-related perturbations. This complexity may also render it difficult to contextualize findings in relation to established, and more intuitive regional neuroimaging markers, notably brain maps describing structural alterations in the condition.6,7 However, recent analytical advances have enabled the decomposition of macroscale connectomes into a series of low-dimensional eigenvectors, also referred to as topographic gradients, describing spatial trends in connectivity.16 Such gradients can be estimated from functional or structural connectivity information,16–19 and have been shown to recapitulate established models of cortical functional hierarchy as well as microscale cortical features.20–23 Gradient mapping, thus, provides a data-driven and biologically plausible perspective on macroscale topographic organization, offering a continuous view of macroscale determinants of functional integration and segregation. This framework has found recent application in the study of neurodevelopment,24 structure-function coupling,25,26 and assessment of conditions of atypical brain function, including autism spectrum disorder,27,28 major depression disorder,29 and generalized epilepsy.30 In the case of TLE, connectome gradient analyses have been applied to high-resolution quantitative T1 relaxometry data and task-based functional MRI during memory paradigms, revealing microstructural miswiring and state-specific functional reorganization.31–33 Here, we expanded these findings by examining functional imbalances in TLE patients at rest, characterizing reorganization of intrinsic functional topographies. The low-dimensional insight into macroscale connectivity offered by spatial gradients also allowed us to assess whether alterations in functional topographies follow atypical patterns of regional brain morphology and microstructure, estimated from structural and diffusion MRI measures in the same participants.6,7,34–36
While the analysis of connectome gradients lends a concise and data-driven window into functional topographies, it does not per se provide insights into directional signal flow that is key to cortical hierarchical organization.37–39 Cortical hierarchy is thought to constrain bottom-up information flow from sensory towards transmodal systems, and top-down modulation in the opposite direction.40–43 Accordingly, changes in connectivity that result in hierarchical imbalances will affect information flow across cortices,27 as is hypothesized in TLE.44 To complement gradient-informed findings, we employed regression dynamic causal modeling (rDCM),45–47 a recently developed generative model of effective connectivity. rDCM expands on the classical dynamic causal modeling framework, and is computationally efficient when dealing with large networks containing hundreds of nodes.48 Additionally, it has high construct validity and test-retest reliability when applied to rs-fMRI data,49,50 making it a potentially useful clinical tool for mapping atypical signal flow in disease.
We investigated whether TLE is associated with atypical functional connectome topography and signal flow. Studying individuals with TLE and healthy controls, we estimated functional topography using data-driven connectome compression techniques and explored patterns of signal flow via rDCM. In addition to examining associations with TLE-related alterations in cortical morphology and white matter microstructure, we tested whether multiscale network-level features were related to cognitive impairments across several domains as measured by behavioral batteries. Our comprehensive analysis employed a large multisite cohort of TLE patients and controls, and various sensitivity analyses evaluated robustness of our findings.
Materials and methods
Participants
We examined 190 individuals, including 95 patients with pharmaco-resistant unilateral TLE (43 males; mean±standard deviation (SD) age = 31.2±10.6 years, 40 right-sided focus) and 95 age- (t = 0.24, P = 0.808) and sex-matched (χ2 = 0.08, P = 0.771) healthy controls (45 males; mean±SD age = 31.5±8.4 years). Participants were selected from three independent sites: (i) Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (MICA-MICs; n = 75),51 (ii) Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (EpiC; n = 50),52 and (iii) Jinling Hospital (NKG; n = 65).53 Patients were diagnosed according to the classification of the International League Against Epilepsy based on a comprehensive evaluation that includes clinical history, seizure semiology, video-electroencephalography recordings, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological assessment. The study was approved by the ethics committees of each site, and all participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declarations of Helsinki. See Table 1 for site-specific demographic and clinical information.
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical information.
EpiC Site | MICA-MICs Site | NKG Site | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||
HC | TLE | p-value | HC | TLE | p-value | HC | TLE | p-value | |
| |||||||||
Number | 25 | 25 | - | 40 | 35 | - | 30 | 35 | - |
Age, y | 31.8(12.2) | 30.8(11.7) | 0.751a | 34.4(3.9) | 35.7(10.7) | 0.481a | 27.5(7.4) | 27.0(7.8) | 0.818a |
Sex, M/F | 14/11 | 10/15 | 0.775b | 20/20 | 16/19 | 0.711b | 14/16 | 17/18 | 0.878b |
Focus Side, L/R | - | 15/10 | - | - | 25/10 | - | - | 15/20 | - |
Onset Age, y | - | 14.0(9.7) | - | - | 20.4(10.2) | - | - | 15.2(8.0) | - |
Duration, y | - | 16.6(14.0) | - | - | 15.2(12.3) | - | - | 11.1(7.6) | - |
HA, n (%) | - | 15(60%) | - | - | 19(54%) | - | - | 32(91%) | - |
Abbreviations: HC, healthy control; TLE, temporal lobe epilepsy; M, male; F, female; L, left; R, right; HA, hippocampal atrophy (percentage of patients in the group), determined as the absolute hippocampal volumes or inter-hemispheric asymmetry beyond 2 SDs of the corresponding mean of healthy controls.54 Age, age at seizure onset, and epilepsy duration are presented as mean (±SD) years.
Two-sample t-test.
Chi-square test.
MRI acquisition
Every participant underwent multimodal MRI data acquisitions, including T1-weighted MRI, rs-fMRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). For the EpiC site, data were acquired on a 3T Philips Achieva scanner, and included (i) a T1-weighted scan (3D spoiled gradient-echo, voxel size = 1×1×1 mm3, TR = 8.1 ms, TE = 3.7 ms, FA = 8°, 240 slices, FOV = 179×256×256 mm3), (ii) a rs-fMRI scan (gradient-echo EPI, voxel size = 2×2×3 mm3, TR = 2000 ms, TE = 30 ms, FA = 90°, 34 slices, 200 volumes), and (iii) a DWI scan (2D EPI, voxel size = 2×2×2 mm3, TR = 11.86 s, TE = 64.3 ms, FOV = 256×256×100 mm3, 2 b0 images, b-value = 2000 s/mm2, 60 diffusion directions). For the MICA-MICs site, data were acquired on a 3T Siemens Magnetom Prisma-Fit scanner, and included: (i) two T1-weighted scans (3D-MPRAGE, voxel size = 0.8×0.8×0.8 mm3, matrix size = 320×320, TR = 2300 ms, TE = 3.14 ms, FA = 9°, TI = 900 ms, 224 slices), (ii) a rs-fMRI scan (multiband accelerated 2D-BOLD EPI, voxel size = 3×3×3 mm3, TR = 600 ms, TE = 30 ms, FA = 52°, FOV = 240×240 mm2, multi-band factor = 6, 48 slices, 700 volumes), and (iii) a multi-shell DWI scan (2D EPI, voxel size = 1.6×1.6×1.6 mm3, TR = 3500 ms, TE = 64.4 ms, FA = 90°, FOV = 224×224 mm2, 3 b0 images, b-values = 300/700/2000 s/mm2, 10/40/90 diffusion directions). For the NKG site, data were acquired on a 3T Siemens Trio scanner, and included (i) a T1-weighted scan (3D-MPRAGE, voxel size = 0.5×0.5×1 mm3, TR = 2300 ms, TE = 2.98 ms, FOV = 256×256 mm2, FA = 9°), (ii) a rs-fMRI scan (2D echo-planar BOLD, voxel size = 3.75×3.75×4 mm3, TR = 2000 ms, TE = 30 ms, FA = 90°, FOV = 240×240 mm2, 30 slices, 255 volumes), and (iii) a DWI scan (2D EPI, voxel size = 0.94×0.94×3 mm3, TR = 6100 ms, TE = 93 ms, FA = 90°, FOV = 240×240 mm2, 4 b0 images, b-value = 1000 s/mm2, 120 diffusion directions).
MRI processing
Multimodal processing utilized micapipe (version 0.1.4; http://micapipe.readthedocs.io),55 an open-access pipeline that integrates AFNI, FSL, FreeSurfer, ANTs, and Workbench.56–60 T1-weighted data were de-obliqued, reoriented, linearly co-registered, intensity non-uniformity corrected, and skull stripped. Models of the inner and outer cortical interfaces were generated using FreeSurfer 6.0, and segmentation errors were manually corrected. Native cortical features were registered to the Conte69 template surface (~32k vertices/hemisphere). Subject-specific cortical thickness was measured as the Euclidean distance between corresponding pial and white matter vertices, and maps were registered to Conte69.61 DWI data were denoised, corrected for susceptibility distortions, head motion, and eddy currents. As in prior studies,36,62,63 a Laplacian potential field between the white–grey matter interface and the ventricular walls guided placement of a superior white matter (SWM) surface. A depth of ~2 mm beneath the grey–white matter boundary was chosen to target both the U-fibre system and the terminations of long-range bundles that lie between 1.5–2.5 mm beneath the cortical interface. Diffusion features, fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), surrogates of fibre architecture and tissue microstructure, were interpolated along the newly mapped SWM surface and registered to Conte69. The rs-fMRI processing included discarding the first five volumes, reorientation, slice-timing correction (EpiC and NKG), and head motion correction. Nuisance signals were removed using an in-house trained ICA-FIX classifier (MICA-MICs).64 Preprocessed timeseries were registered to native FreeSurfer space using boundary-based registration65 and resampled to Conte69. Preprocessed surface-based maps (cortical thickness, FA, MD, and rs-fMRI time series) underwent spatial smoothing (full-width-at-half-maximum = 10 mm). Finally, these vertex-wise maps were averaged based on the Glasser parcellation,66 a multimodal atlas with 180 homologous parcels per hemisphere.
Connectome gradient analysis
Cortex-wide functional connectome gradients were generated with BrainSpace (version 0.1.10; https://github.com/MICA-MNI/BrainSpace).67 Pearson’s correlations of time series between each pair of regions were calculated, yielding a 360×360 functional connectome matrix per participant. As in prior work,16 we retained the top 10% weighted connections per region after z-transforming. An affinity matrix was constructed using a normalized angle kernel to capture the similarity in connectivity profiles between regions.68 Diffusion map embedding, a robust and computationally efficient non-linear manifold learning technique,16,69 was used to identify gradient components that explained the variance in the connectivity profiles of the functional connectome. This algorithm was controlled by two parameters: α, which controlled the influence of the density of sampling points on the manifold (α = 0, maximal influence; α = 1, no influence), and t, which controlled the scale of eigenvalues of the diffusion operator. The values of α and t were set to 0.5 and 0, as previously, to retain global relations between data points in the embedded space.16,27,67 Individual-level gradient maps were aligned using Procrustes rotation70 to template gradients generated from 100 unrelated healthy adults from the Human Connectome Project database (HCP, MRI parameters and processing can be found elsewhere60,71), following prior work.31,72,73 The HCP dataset has high-quality imaging data, and is commonly used for building brain atlases,66 and constructing reference templates for gradient alignment as well as contextualization.25,67,72,73
To evaluate between-group differences in gradient values between TLE patients and controls, we first z-scored gradient maps in patients with respect to site-matched controls, and sorted them into ipsilateral/contralateral to the seizure focus.74 Surface-based linear models implemented in BrainStat (version 0.4.2; https://brainstat.readthedocs.io),75 with age, sex, and site as covariates, compared group and were used to determine Cohen’s d effect sizes. Multiple comparisons were corrected using a false discovery rate (FDR) procedure.76 We further stratified gradient findings based on twelve macroscale functional networks (Cole-Anticevic Brain-wide Network Partition) defined on the Glasser atlas.77
As participants were selected from three independent sites, we assessed consistency of our findings across sites using two analyses. First, we calculated mean gradient values within the significant clusters identified in the main multisite analysis and compared them between groups in each site separately using two-sample t-tests. Second, we implemented surface-wide gradient comparisons for each site while controlling for age and sex. We measured cortex-wide consistency across sites using spatial correlations of site-specific case-control effect size maps (Cohen’s d), and determined the significance of correlations using spin permutation tests (5,000 times) to preserve spatial autocorrelation of the original data (P values were denoted as Pspin).78–80
Effective connectivity analysis
To infer directed functional flow to and from regions of significant gradient alterations, we used rDCM, a scalable and computationally efficient generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity (EC) from rs-fMRI.45,49,81 Compared to conventional dynamic causal modelling framework,48 rDCM (i) translates state and observation equations of a linear dynamic causal model from the time to the frequency domain, (ii) substitutes the non-linear hemodynamic model with a linear hemodynamic response function, (iii) implements a mean-field approximation across regions (i.e., parameters targeting different regions are assumed to be independent), and (iv) specifies conjugate priors on the noise precision, connectivity, and driving input parameters.49,50 These modifications essentially reformulate a linear DCM in the time domain as a Bayesian linear regression in the frequency domain. rDCM, thus, scales to large networks including hundreds of nodes, enabling EC estimation from rs-fMRI at the whole-brain level. A comprehensive description of rDCM, including the mathematical details of the neuronal state equations, can be found elsewhere.45,46
Extracted time series from processed rs-fMRI were utilized for whole-brain EC estimation in each individual, using a fully connected network architecture of rDCM, implemented in TAPAS (version 6.0.1; https://www.tnu.ethz.ch/de/software/tapas).81 The resulting EC matrix (360×360, including 129,240 connectivity parameters and 360 inhibitory self-connections) was divided into an efferent component (i.e., columns in Fig. 2A), reflecting outward signal flow, and an afferent component (i.e., rows in Fig. 2A), reflecting inward flow. For each node, we computed weighted outward/inward degree (defined as the sum of unsigned efferent/afferent connectivity weights82). To capture overall signal flow alterations, we compared the aggregate of outward and inward degree measures between patients and controls using multivariate surface-based linear models. Post-hoc univariate models separately determined specific patterns of outward- or inward-degree differences between groups.
Figure 2. Relation to effective connectivity (EC).
(A) Regression dynamic causal modelling was used to construct whole-brain effective connectivity (EC) matrix (middle) from rs-fMRI data, where columns represent sources and rows represent targets. We computed node-wise outward degree by adding the column-wise unsigned EC weights (left), and node-wise inward degree by adding the row-wise unsigned EC weights (right) in each participant. (B) Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed EC changes in patients with TLE compared to controls. Significant clusters after multiple comparisons correction based on the false discovery rate (FDR) procedure are outlined in black. (C) Associations between gradient and EC alterations. (i) Between-group differences in the mean outward- and inward-degree values. (ii) Across-participant correlations between the mean gradient and outward-/inward-degree values in TLE and control groups separately. The individual-level mean gradient, outward- and inward-degree values were derived from averaging all clusters showing significant gradient reductions in multisite analyses (see Fig. 1C). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01. Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; TLE, temporal lobe epilepsy; Ipsi, ipsilateral; Contra, contralateral.
To interrogate whether EC alterations can account for gradient anomalies, we repeated our functional connectome gradient analysis while also controlling for node-wise outward- and inward-degree measures. Moreover, we computed the mean outward- and inward-degree values in clusters of significant gradient reductions (Fig. 1C), and correlated these with subject-specific mean gradient values in the same regions in controls and individuals with TLE separately.
Figure 1. Between-group differences in the principal functional gradient.
(A) The principal gradient in healthy controls and patients with TLE. (B) Global histograms indicated that the two gradient anchors were contracted in patients with TLE relative to controls. (C) Surface-based linear models, controlling for age, sex, and site, showed regional differences in the principal gradient between groups. Significant clusters after multiple comparisons correction, based on the false discovery rate (FDR) procedure, are outlined in black (PFDR < 0.05). (D) Community-wise analysis revealed reduced gradient values predominantly in the default-mode network (DMN) and increases in the secondary visual network (VS2) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) in TLE (PFDR < 0.05). (E) Across-site consistency. (i) Site-specific between-group differences in the mean gradient values within clusters of significant gradient reductions (from the main multisite analysis). (ii) Across-site spatial correlations of between-group effect size maps (i.e., unthresholded Cohen’s d maps), with each dot representing the Cohen’s d effect size from one region. Statistical significance of spatial correlations (i.e., Pspin) was evaluated using 5,000 spin permutation tests to account for the spatial autocorrelation.78–80 Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; TLE, temporal lobe epilepsy; Ipsi, ipsilateral; Contra, contralateral.
Assessment of morphological and microstructural substrates
We examined associations between functional changes, cortical morphology, and SWM microstructure with several analyses. Firstly, surface-based linear models compared morphological and microstructural indices between patients with TLE and controls, while regressing out effects of age, sex, and site. Secondly, we tested for TLE-related gradient changes above and beyond these effects. In particular, we compared principal functional gradient scores between groups while additionally controlling for regional cortical thickness and diffusion parameters independently. Finally, statistical mediation analyses evaluated whether altered cortical structure and SWM microstructure contributed to gradient changes. The model included the principal gradient values (i.e., Gradient) as dependent variable, Group (i.e., TLE vs. controls) as predictor, and cortical structure (i.e., Structure, including cortical thickness, FA, or MD) as mediator. We calculated mean cortical thickness, FA, MD, and gradient values within clusters of significant gradient reductions (see Fig. 1C) for each participant and examined four paths: (i) path a, the relationship between Group and Structure; (ii) path b, the relationship between Structure and Gradient; (iii) path c’: the direct effect of Group on Gradient while controlling for the mediator Structure; (iv) the mediation/indirect effect a*b, which refers to the effect of the relationship between Group and Gradient that was reduced after controlling for Structure. Significance was determined using bootstrapped confidence intervals (10,000 times), implemented in the MediationToolbox (version 1.0.0; https://github.com/canlab/MediationToolbox).
Associations with cognitive variables
At the MICA-MICs site, participants completed three memory tasks (semantic, episodic, and spatial) while in the scanner, and the EpiTrack test outside the scanner.83 In the semantic task, participants had to identify the item that was conceptually most similar to the target in a 3-alternative forced-choice design. There were 56 pseudo-randomized trials (28 easy, Sem-E; 28 difficult, Sem-D). The UMBC index (range: 0–1), measuring the semantic relatedness of items,84 was 0–0.3 between the foils and target in Sem-E trials, and 0.3–0.7 in Sem-D trials.85 The episodic task consisted of two phases, where participants had to memorize pairs of images presented simultaneously and identify the object item originally paired with the target from the encoding phase in a 3-alternative forced-choice design, following a 10-min delay.85 There were in total 56 pseudo-randomized trials, with 28 corresponding to pairs of images encoded only once (Epi-D), and 28 to pairs of images encoded twice (Epi-E). The UMBC index of each pair was smaller than 0.3. In the spatial task, which also consisted of two phases, participants had to memorize the spatial arrangement of 3 semantically unrelated items (UMBC index < 0.3), and discriminate the original layout from two additional foil layouts of the same items, following a jittered interval (0.5–1.5s).85 The task had 56 pseudo-randomized trials (28 easy, Spa-E; 28 difficult, Spa-D). In Spa-D trials, the foil layouts varied from the original one by 2 degrees of separation (i.e., rotation about the center of mass and spacing alteration), while in Spa-E trials, the foil layouts comprised 3 degrees (i.e., rotation about the center of mass, spacing alteration, and item positional swap). After excluding participants with incomplete data (n = 12), a total of 63 participants were retained for this analysis (38 controls and 25 TLEs). Experiment scripts and stimuli are available on http://github.com/MICA-MNI/micaopen/.
At the EpiC site, participants completed the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-IV) consisting of 7 subtests that evaluate memory performance.86 WMS-IV derived 5 indices, including auditory memory (AMI), visual memory (VMI), visual working memory (VWMI), immediate memory (IMI), and delayed memory (DMI). Indices were normalized based on a Mexican population, and adjusted for age as well as education level. After excluding participants with incomplete data (n = 5), a total of 45 participants were retained for this analysis (20 controls and 25 TLEs). No cognitive data were available for the NKG site.
We examined the relationship between participants’ cognitive performance and functional network metrics. We calculated the mean gradient, outward- and inward-degree values within regions exhibiting significant gradient reductions for everyone. Specific memory indices were z-scored, and fed into a principal component analysis to reduce dimensionality. We correlated the resulting first component (i.e., PC1, capturing overall memory performance) with each of the three imaging measures across TLE and controls while regressing out effects of age and sex. We also built a multiple linear regression model to combine all three imaging measures (i.e., PC1 ~ gradient + outward-degree + inward-degree). These analyses were conducted at MICA-MICs and EpiC sites separately. To interrogate specificity of brain-memory association, we assessed correlations with individual EpiTrack scores that reflected attention and executive functions (available only at the MICA-MICs site).83
Cognitive decoding based on Neurosynth
To explore cognitive associations of brain regions showing TLE-related gradient changes, we performed a functional decoding analysis using Neurosynth (https://neurosynth.org/, December 2020 release), a platform for ad hoc meta-analysis of task-based functional MRI data.87 FDR-corrected brain regions obtained from between-group comparisons of the principal functional gradient (Fig. 1C) were used as the input for a “decoder” wrapper implemented in BrainStat.75 We focused on cognitive and disorder-related terms, and excluded anatomical and demographic terms.
Sensitivity analyses
Left and right TLE
As seizure focus lateralization may affect topological organization of functional networks, we repeated our group-level functional gradient analysis in left (nLTLE = 55) and right TLE (nRTLE = 40) separately, and spatially correlated effect sizes (i.e., Cohen’s d). We also conducted two-sample t-tests to directly compare mean gradient values within significant regions of multisite aggregation analyses (see Fig. 1C) between left/right TLE and controls.
Head motion and tSNR effects
To confirm that main gradient findings were not related to fMRI-scanning related artifacts, we calculated the degree of head motion (i.e., framewise displacement, FD) during the rs-fMRI scan as well as cortex-wide temporal signal-to-noise ratio.88,89 We repeated functional gradient group comparisons while controlling for individual mean FD or regional tSNR estimates.
Data availability
The Human Connectome Project dataset is available under https://db.humanconnectome.org/. MICA-MICs dataset51 is available under the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform Data Portal (https://portal.conp.ca/) and the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/j532r/). Surface-based functional connectome gradients will be available on osf.io.
Results
Altered topographic gradients in TLE
We studied a multisite dataset of TLE patients and healthy controls, and applied non-linear dimensionality techniques to cortex-wide functional connectomes derived from rs-fMRI data to estimate topographic gradients in each participant.67 The principal gradient explained 16.5 ± 1.3% of the total variance (TLE: 16.4 ± 1.3%; healthy controls, 16.5 ± 1.3%), and displayed gradual connectivity differentiation from unimodal sensory/motor regions to transmodal association cortices in both groups (spatial map similarity: rho = 0.98, Pspin < 0.001; Fig. 1A), in line with prior findings in healthy adults.16
Notably, the extremes of the gradient histograms were contracted in TLE relative to controls (Fig. 1B). This finding was also supported by surface-based between-group comparisons, where we observed lower gradient values in bilateral temporal and ventromedial prefrontal cortices in TLE patients relative to controls (PFDR < 0.05; mean ± SD Cohen’s d in significant clusters: −0.46 ± 0.14; Fig. 1C). Stratification analysis using a well-established functional atlas77 showed that patients with TLE had lower gradient values in the default-mode network, and higher values in secondary visual and cingulo-opercular networks (PFDR < 0.05, Fig. 1D). Findings were consistent across all sites, with TLE patients showing robust gradient decreases in temporal and mesial prefrontal regions across all sites (Cohen’s d for EpiC/MICA-MICs/NKG = −0.41/−0.64/−1.02). Spatial patterns of TLE-related gradient alterations were similar across sites (EpiC vs. MICA-MICs: rho = 0.35, Pspin = 0.003; EpiC vs. NKG: rho = 0.31, Pspin = 0.011; MICA-MICs vs. NKG: rho = 0.53, Pspin < 0.001; Fig. 1E and Supplementary Fig. 1).
Relation to effective connectivity alterations
After characterizing connectome gradient alterations in TLE, we examined the relationship between the observed topographic changes and atypical functional signal flow. We utilized rDCM49 to estimate cortex-wide effective connectivity (EC) from rs-fMRI data for each individual, and to calculate nodal outward and inward degree centrality (see Materials and Methods for details). Spatial distributions of outward- and inward-degree values across the cortex were similar (rho = 0.54, Pspin < 0.001). Specifically, lateral frontoparietal and medial occipital regions showed higher outward degree, indicative of relatively stronger efferent signal flow, while the temporolimbic cortex exhibited lower outward degree, corresponding to weaker efferent flow. Inward degree, on the other hand, predominantly varied along the anterior-posterior axis of the neocortex, with occipito-parietal regions exhibiting highest afferent connectivity, while mesiotemporal and paralimbic cortices such as the orbitofrontal and anterior insula showed lower values (Fig. 2A).
Cortex-wide multivariate between-group comparisons, which aggregated outward- and inward-degree, revealed significant alterations in TLE relative to controls, predominantly in a bilateral network encompassing the middle temporal gyri, insula, ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, as well as in contralateral central regions (PFDR < 0.05; Fig. 2B). Univariate analyses indicated that both outward- and inward-degree values were reduced in these regions in TLE (PFDR < 0.05; Fig. 2B). To assess shared effects of gradient and directed connectivity changes, we then compared the principal functional gradient between groups using statistical models that also controlled for outward- and inward-degree in each region. Using this approach, effect sizes of gradient reductions were reduced and patterns of gradient changes in TLE were overall less extensive, with only the bilateral temporal poles showing significant gradient changes following FDR-correction (PFDR < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 2). We also quantified the association between principal gradient and EC changes in a post hoc analysis focusing on regions of significant gradient reductions in TLE (see Fig. 1C). Here, we calculated the mean outward- and inward-degree values within these regions for each participant and correlated them with subject-specific mean gradient values in the same regions. Compared to controls, patients with TLE exhibited lower outward- (Cohen’s d = −0.27, P = 0.030) and inward-degree values (Cohen’s d = −0.36, P = 0.005) (Fig. 2C). Moreover, there was a positive correlation between gradient values and corresponding outward- (r = 0.24, P = 0.010) and inward-degree values (r = 0.27, P = 0.005) in the TLE group (Fig. 2C). In other words, reduced outward/inward signal flow was associated with a lower connectome gradient value. In both cases, associations between gradient and EC degree values were nominally weaker in healthy controls (outward: r = 0.07, P = 0.266; inward: r = 0.20, P = 0.024).
Effects of cortical morphology and microstructure
Consistent with prior studies,6,7 individuals with TLE demonstrated grey matter atrophy in precentral, paracentral, superior parietal, and precuneus cortices bilaterally (PFDR < 0.05; Fig. 3A). Yet, the functional gradient reductions in TLE remained virtually unchanged (Cohen’s d = −0.47 ± 0.14; increase of Cohen’s d = −2%) when incorporating regional atrophy profiles as a covariate in the statistical model (Fig. 3A). We also detected widespread TLE-related alterations in SWM diffusion parameters (including decreased FA and increased MD), particularly in bilateral temporal, lateral frontal, and posterior parietal cortices (PFDR < 0.005; Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. 3). In contrast to the atrophy-corrected findings, correcting for SWM changes considerably weakened the observed functional gradient reductions in TLE (Cohen’s d = −0.36 ± 0.04; reduction of Cohen’s d = 21%; Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. 4). To further investigate the relationship between functional and structural alterations, we carried out a statistical mediation analyses using thickness/FA/MD as the mediator variable in regions of significant gradient reductions (see Fig. 1C). This analysis confirmed that TLE-related functional gradient reductions were independent of cortical atrophy (mediation effect = 0.001, P = 0.401), but mediated by SWM alterations (mediation effect of FA and MD = −0.006/−0.003, P < 0.001/0.050; Fig. 3C).
Figure 3. Structure-function relationship.
(A) Surface-wide between-group differences in cortical thickness (CT), and in the principal functional gradient after controlling for regional CT. (B) Surface-wide between-group differences in superficial white matter (SWM) properties (i.e., fractional anisotropy, FA; mean diffusivity, MD), and in the principal functional gradient after controlling for regional SWM parameters. (C) Mediation analyses using Group (TLE vs HC) as the predictive variable, Structure (CT, FA, or MD) as the mediator variable, and Gradient1 as the dependent variable. Path a indicated the effects of Group on Structure; path b indicated the effects of Structure on Gradient1, and paths c’ and a*b indicated the direct, and the indirect/mediation effects of Group on Gradient1, respectively. Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; TLE, temporal lobe epilepsy; Ipsi, ipsilateral; Contra, contralateral.
Associations with cognition
We conducted our main analysis at the MICA-MICs site, which included three memory tests based on episodic, semantic, and spatial paradigms.85,90 Results showed that patients with TLE exhibited poorer memory performance compared to controls based on a unified measure of these three tests, derived via principal component analysis (i.e., PC1 score, Cohen’s d = −0.76, P < 0.010). Individual memory performance correlated with the principal gradient (r = 0.23, P = 0.034), outward-degree (r = 0.33, P = 0.004), and inward-degree values (r = 0.34, P = 0.004) within regions of significant gradient reductions (Fig. 4A). In other words, greater functional topographic changes were associated with more severe memory impairments. We confirmed this relationship using multi-linear regression based on all three functional measures (i.e., PC1 ~ gradient + outward-degree + inward-degree) (r = 0.41, P = 0.004). Findings were replicated at the EpiC site (TLE vs. controls, Cohen’s d for PC1 = −0.95, P < 0.001; principal gradient: r = 0.21, P = 0.078; outward-degree: r = 0.22, P = 0.076; inward-degree: r = 0.20, P = 0.097; multi-linear regression: r = 0.34, P = 0.072; Fig. 4B).
Figure 4. Brain-memory associations at MICA-MICs (A) and EpiC (B).
(i) Between-group differences in the overall memory performance (i.e., PC1 score) determined through principal component analyses (PCA) on various memory tests; (ii) Across-subject correlations between memory performance and the mean gradient, outward-degree, and inward-degree values within significant clusters of gradient reductions (see Fig. 1C) after controlling for age and sex. ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; TLE: temporal lobe epilepsy; Epi-D, episodic difficult; Epi-E, episodic easy; Sem-D, semantic difficult; Sem-E, semantic easy; Spa-D, spatial difficult; Spa-E, spatial easy; AMI, auditory memory; DMI, delayed memory; IMI, immediate memory; VMI, visual memory; VWMI, visual working memory.
To assess specificity, we studied a complementary measure of attentional-executive ability (EpiTrack test) available at the MICA-MICs site.83 Although individuals with TLE exhibited lower EpiTrack scores relative to healthy controls (Cohen’s d = −0.48, P < 0.05), across-subject associations with connectome alterations were not as strong as those for memory (all P-values > 0.100; Supplementary Fig. 5). Moreover, an ad hoc meta-analysis confirmed that regions of significant gradient reductions were implicated in memory function,87 with several higher-order cognitive and memory-related terms showing high associations (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Sensitivity analyses
Several analyses supported robustness of our main gradient findings.
Left and right TLE
While the degree of gradient alterations was stronger in right compared to left TLE patients, findings were overall consistent in both cohorts (rho = 0.52, Pspin < 0.001, Supplementary Fig. 7). Left and right TLE patients showed marked gradient reductions in lateral temporal and medial prefrontal cortices relative to controls (Cohen’s d = −0.58/−0.86 and P < 0.001/0.001, respectively).
Head motion and tSNR effects
Main gradient findings were robust relative to several confounders; between-group changes in the principal functional gradient were comparable when controlling for individual mean FD (Cohen’s d = −0.41 ± 0.05) and regional temporal signal-to-noise ratio estimates (Cohen’s d = −0.45 ± 0.04, Supplementary Fig. 8).
Discussion
This study investigated macroscale functional network reorganization in pharmaco-resistant TLE patients relative to healthy controls, and interrogated its association with cortex-wide structural compromise as well as cognitive impairments. Capitalizing on topographic gradient mapping and model-based estimation of directional signal flow patterns in a multi-site cohort of TLE patients and controls, we discovered a marked contraction of the principal unimodal-transmodal gradient in the former group, with peak effects in temporolimbic and ventromedial prefrontal regions. Findings were consistent across the three included study sites, supporting generalizability. Regions of gradient alterations in TLE exhibited lower functional signal flow to and from the rest of the brain, suggesting atypical hierarchy-dependent signalling. Moreover, multimodal MRI feature integration in the same participants indicated that functional reorganization was mediated by white matter microstructural and architectural rearrangement in temporo-limbic regions, but rather unaffected by the rather diffuse and bilateral TLE-related changes in cortical grey matter thickness. Relating functional features to behavioral measures of cognitive abilities revealed specific associations with inter-individual differences in memory. Taken together, our study supports large-scale functional topographic and signalling alterations in TLE, emphasizes a mediatory role of white matter alterations, and suggests an association to memory impairment commonly seen in the condition.
The functional topographic mapping approach chosen in this work leveraged non-linear manifold learning techniques, which compress high-dimensional connectomes into a series of low-dimensional eigenvectors that describe spatial trends in connectivity changes in a data-driven and spatially unconstrained manner. As seen previously,16,23,91 the primary eigenvector followed a hierarchical gradient from sensory/motor systems (known to interact with the external environment) to transmodal association systems (such as the default mode and frontoparietal networks, known to support abstract, higher-order processing). Cortex-wide analysis uncovered a significant compression of the principal gradient in TLE compared to controls, signifying less divergent functional architecture in the former group. This could indicate an imbalance of functional segregation and integration.92–94 By supporting hierarchical information transmission, sensory-to-transmodal segregation may facilitate specialized processing, and contribute to integrative function.95 Our findings were prominent in temporal and ventromedial prefrontal cortices, transmodal regions known to be vulnerable to TLE-related compromise.6,62 Reductions in functional gradient values in these regions likely indicate a diminished hierarchical differentiation in connectivity profiles from other brain networks, in our case from regions that are likely at lower hierarchical levels. Such finding may echo prior work reporting atypical intrinsic functional signalling and altered connectivity in similar territories, both at the nodal and global levels, in TLE.96–98 Prior rs-fMRI studies have reported imbalances in short- and long-range functional connectivity in the temporoinsular cortex in TLE, supporting that the atypical connectivity of these regions may potentially predispose to aberrant signal flow.62 By showing atypical functional topographies that broadly colocalize with these areas, our results contribute to the emerging literature in supporting that TLE impacts intrinsic brain function, signaling, and macroscale functional topographic organization.44,99,100
To further capture atypical signal flow in TLE, we incorporated a recently formulated generative model of effective connectivity, rDCM, into our analytical stream. This approach is computationally efficient and can be scaled to large networks.49,50 Applying rDCM to healthy participants, we found a spatially heterogeneous distribution of regional outward and inward degree centrality, with core default mode nodes in medial parietal and lateral prefrontal as well as posterior regions exhibiting elevated outward- and inward-degree. This finding supports their role as cortical hubs, aligning with structural and functional connectomics research more generally.82,101 Notably, comparing inward- and outward-degree measures between cohorts, patients with TLE displayed broad perturbations in signal flow in several functional systems, particularly in bilateral temporal and frontoparietal cortices. Prior invasive electroencephalography studies have reported atypical, directed connectivity in TLE affecting specific localized circuits as well as macroscale functional networks.102–105 Hierarchical organisation constrains activity propagation,37,41 which may also explain why disruptions in cortical topographies were accompanied by a shift in signal flow in our patients.106 Associations between functional gradient and signal flow patterns were also more marked in TLE patients than in controls, supporting a pathological effect and strengthening associations between two complementary indices compared to the normative association seen in healthy individuals. Atypical signal flow in TLE may relate to findings showing aberrant synchronizability,107 mechanisms that are particularly visible in more distributed yet densely connected transmodal networks.108 Prior rs-fMRI evidence has supported increased functional segregation of temporolimbic cortices in TLE,62 which may be suggestive of a diminished ability of surrounding brain areas to regulate, or contain, activity patterns in these networks. Others have observed the presence of tight, inhibitory connections from hubs localized in areas outside of the seizure-generating region, which may limit synchronizability of healthy activity states.109
Structural and diffusion MRI studies have previously reported cortical morphological changes and altered microstructure in deep and superficial white matter in TLE patients relative to controls.7,34,36,62 These alterations may disrupt the spatial arrangement of functional networks, and in turn affect hierarchical organization. In our patients, alterations in SWM microstructure followed a spatial distribution with highest effects in the transmodal systems, including the temporolimbic, prefrontal, and default mode regions, and lower effects in sensory and unimodal areas. Prior analyses of both the deep and superficial white matter in TLE reported similar patterns,36,110 with effects often declining with increasing distance from the temporo-limbic disease epicentre. These findings also resemble analyses of intracortical myelin proxies, which pointed to altered microstructure and microstructural differentiation of temporo-limbic cortices.33,111 Importantly, the SWM findings spatially resembled the distribution of connectome gradient changes in our patients, supporting a mediatory role of this compartment on functional anomalies. Indeed, our post hoc analysis demonstrated that functional topographic findings were partially mediated by SWM changes. Such findings may corroborate connectivity-based models of regional susceptibility, where regions anatomically or functionally connected to a pathological epicentre undergo more marked alterations.6,8,112,113 In addition, they may furthermore support previous models of more marked susceptibility of paralimbic regions to structural and functional rearrangement, potentially due to their higher potential for plasticity and connectivity reorganization.72,114 In contrast to the SWM findings, functional topographic changes were not significantly mediated by cortical thinning, a finding echoing earlier work showing a modest contribution of neocortical morphological changes to macroscale functional imbalances in TLE.62,115 More diffuse grey matter changes beyond the mesiotemporal lobe, as mapped by case-control analyses here, may partly result from ongoing disease processes, and reflect cumulative effects of seizures, anti-seizure medication, and challenged psychosocial functioning.116–119 Such effects are possibly broad, and perhaps less well captured by the intrinsic functional measures that we employed here and that point to a more hierarchy-specific alteration.
Higher cognitive functions rely on distributed network mechanisms,120–122 and network changes in our TLE patients were also found to closely correlate with behavioral indices of cognitive impairment. Specifically, more pronounced topographic gradient alterations and reduced signal flow in temporal and medial prefrontal cortices reflected inter-individual differences in overall memory ability. Meta-analytical decoding confirmed that TLE-related functional gradient alterations co-localized with regions implicated in higher, self-generated functions, including memory. Echoing their established contribution to memory in healthy individuals,123–125 atypical activations of these regions in TLE patients have also been reported in prior memory task-fMRI studies.126,127 Default mode regions are situated at maximal distances from sensory/motor systems16,128, which may provide a physical substrate for a processing route that spans from the representation of concrete stimuli towards more abstract and integrative representations.91 This setup also increases the divergence between large-scale systems, facilitating the formation of abstract cognition by avoiding the interference of input noise.129 In our patients, reduced functional differentiation between sensory/motor and transmodal systems may, thus, contribute to an inefficient separation between stimulus-driven representations and internally-oriented processes, which may incur memory dysfunction. By contextualizing memory functions in a topographic connectome framework, our findings underscore contributions of macroscale reorganization to TLE-related memory impairments.
Supplementary Material
Funding
K.X. is funded by the China Scholarship Council (CSC: 202006070175). J.R. is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). S.L. is funded by the CIHR and the Ann and Richard Sievers Neuroscience Award. R.R.C. is funded by the Fonds de la Recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQ-S). A.N. is funded by the FRQ-S. J.D. is funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada - Post-Doctoral Fellowship (NSERC-PDF). L.C. acknowledges support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH, R56NS099348). B.F.’s salary is supported by a salary award of the FRQ-S (Chercheur-boursier Senior 2021–2025). The UNAM site is funded by the UNAM-DGAPA (IB201712, IG200117) and Conacyt (181508 and Programa de Laboratorios Nacionales). B.C.B. acknowledges research support from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Discovery-1304413), CIHR (FDN-154298, PJT-174995), SickKids Foundation (NI17–039), the Helmholtz International BigBrain Analytics and Learning Laboratory (HIBALL), Healthy Brains and Healthy Lives, BrainCanada, and the Tier-2 Canada Research Chairs program.
Abbreviations:
- AMI
auditory memory index
- DMI
delayed memory index
- EC
effective connectivity
- FA
fractional anisotropy
- IMI
immediate memory index
- MD
mean diffusivity
- rDCM
regression dynamic causal modeling
- SWM
superior white matter
- TLE
temporal lobe epilepsy
- VMI
visual memory index
- VWMI
visual working memory index
- WMS-IV
Wechsler Memory Scale
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors report no competing interests.
References
- 1.Téllez-Zenteno JF, Hernández-Ronquillo L. A review of the epidemiology of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res Treat. 2012;2012:630853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blümcke I, Thom M, Aronica E, et al. International consensus classification of hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy: A Task Force report from the ILAE Commission on Diagnostic Methods. Epilepsia. 2013;54(7):1315–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Larivière S, Royer J, Rodríguez-Cruces R, et al. Structural network alterations in focal and generalized epilepsy assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study follow axes of epilepsy risk gene expression. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Royer J, Bernhardt BC, Larivière S, et al. Epilepsy and brain network hubs. Epilepsia. 2022;63(3):537–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stasenko A, Lin C, Bonilha L, Bernhardt BC, McDonald CR. Neurobehavioral and clinical comorbidities in epilepsy: The role of white matter network disruption. Neuroscientist. 2022:10738584221076133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Larivière S, Rodríguez-Cruces R, Royer J, et al. Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study. Sci Adv. 2020;6(47):eabc6457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Whelan CD, Altmann A, Botia JA, et al. Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study. Brain. 2018;141(2):391–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(3):159–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bernhardt BC, Chen Z, He Y, Evans AC, Bernasconi N. Graph-theoretical analysis reveals disrupted small-world organization of cortical thickness correlation networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21(9):2147–2157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yasuda CL, Chen Z, Beltramini GC, et al. Aberrant topological patterns of brain structural network in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2015;56(12):1992–2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maccotta L, He BJ, Snyder AZ, et al. Impaired and facilitated functional networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;2:862–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bernhardt BC, Bernasconi A, Liu M, et al. The spectrum of structural and functional imaging abnormalities in temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(1):142–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lin JJ, Mula M, Hermann BP. Uncovering the neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy over the lifespan. The Lancet. 2012;380(9848):1180–1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rodriguez-Cruces R, Royer J, Larivière S, Bassett DS, Caciagli L, Bernhardt BC. Multimodal connectome biomarkers of cognitive and affective dysfunction in the common epilepsies. Netw Neurosci. 2022;6(2):320–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hermann BP, Struck AF, Busch RM, Reyes A, Kaestner E, McDonald CR. Neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy: towards a network-based precision taxonomy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Margulies DS, Ghosh SS, Goulas A, et al. Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(44):12574–12579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Paquola C, Hong S-J. The potential of myelin-sensitive imaging: Redefining spatiotemporal patterns of myeloarchitecture. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;93(5):442–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park B-y Bethlehem RAI, Paquola C, et al. An expanding manifold in transmodal regions characterizes adolescent reconfiguration of structural connectome organization. eLife. 2021;10:e64694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Paquola C, Seidlitz J, Benkarim O, et al. A multi-scale cortical wiring space links cellular architecture and functional dynamics in the human brain. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(11):e3000979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Burt JB, Demirtas M, Eckner WJ, et al. Hierarchy of transcriptomic specialization across human cortex captured by structural neuroimaging topography. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(9):1251–1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huntenburg JM, Bazin PL, Margulies DS. Large-scale gradients in human cortical organization. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018;22(1):21–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goulas A, Changeux JP, Wagstyl K, Amunts K, Palomero-Gallagher N, Hilgetag CC. The natural axis of transmitter receptor distribution in the human cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(3):e2020574118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sydnor VJ, Larsen B, Bassett DS, et al. Neurodevelopment of the association cortices: Patterns, mechanisms, and implications for psychopathology. Neuron. 2021;109(18):2820–2846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dong H-M, Margulies DS, Zuo X-N, Holmes AJ. Shifting gradients of macroscale cortical organization mark the transition from childhood to adolescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(28):e2024448118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Paquola C, Vos De Wael R, Wagstyl K, et al. Microstructural and functional gradients are increasingly dissociated in transmodal cortices. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(5):e3000284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Valk SL, Xu T, Paquola C, et al. Genetic and phylogenetic uncoupling of structure and function in human transmodal cortex. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hong SJ, Vos de Wael R, Bethlehem RAI, et al. Atypical functional connectome hierarchy in autism. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Park B-y Hong S-J, Valk SL, et al. Differences in subcortico-cortical interactions identified from connectome and microcircuit models in autism. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xia M, Liu J, Mechelli A, et al. Connectome gradient dysfunction in major depression and its association with gene expression profiles and treatment outcomes. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(3):1384–1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Meng Y, Yang S, Chen H, et al. Systematically disrupted functional gradient of the cortical connectome in generalized epilepsy: Initial discovery and independent sample replication. NeuroImage. 2021;230:117831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li Q, Tavakol S, Royer J, et al. Atypical neural topographies underpin dysfunctional pattern separation in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain. 2021;144(8):2486–2498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Caciagli L, Paquola C, He X, et al. Disorganization of language and working memory systems in frontal versus temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain. 2022;146(3):935–953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Royer J, Larivière S, Rodriguez-Cruces R, et al. Cortical microstructural gradients capture memory network reorganization in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain. 2023:awad125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hatton SN, Huynh KH, Bonilha L, et al. White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study. Brain. 2020;143(8):2454–2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bernhardt BC, Worsley KJ, Kim H, Evans AC, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of atrophy in pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2009;72(20):1747–1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu M, Bernhardt BC, Hong SJ, Caldairou B, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N. The superficial white matter in temporal lobe epilepsy: a key link between structural and functional network disruptions. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 9):2431–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Raut RV, Snyder AZ, Mitra A, et al. Global waves synchronize the brain’s functional systems with fluctuating arousal. Sci Adv. 2021;7(30):eabf2709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gu Y, Sainburg LE, Kuang S, et al. Brain activity fluctuations propagate as waves traversing the cortical hierarchy. Cereb Cortex. 2021;31(9):3986–4005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yousefi B, Keilholz S. Propagating patterns of intrinsic activity along macroscale gradients coordinate functional connections across the whole brain. NeuroImage. 2021;231:117827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Markov NT, Kennedy H. The importance of being hierarchical. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23(2):187–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Markov NT, Ercsey-Ravasz M, Van Essen DC, Knoblauch K, Toroczkai Z, Kennedy H. Cortical high-density counterstream architectures. Science. 2013;342(6158):1238406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Markov NT, Vezoli J, Chameau P, et al. Anatomy of hierarchy: Feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex. J Comp Neurol. 2014;522(1):225–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vezoli J, Magrou L, Goebel R, et al. Cortical hierarchy, dual counterstream architecture and the importance of top-down generative networks. NeuroImage. 2021;225:117479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Girardi-Schappo M, Fadaie F, Lee HM, et al. Altered communication dynamics reflect cognitive deficits in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2021;62(4):1022–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Frässle S, Lomakina EI, Razi A, Friston KJ, Buhmann JM, Stephan KE. Regression DCM for fMRI. NeuroImage. 2017;155:406–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Frässle S, Lomakina EI, Kasper L, et al. A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity. NeuroImage. 2018;179:505–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Frassle S, Manjaly ZM, Do CT, Kasper L, Pruessmann KP, Stephan KE. Whole-brain estimates of directed connectivity for human connectomics. NeuroImage. 2021;225:117491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Friston KJ, Kahan J, Biswal B, Razi A. A DCM for resting state fMRI. NeuroImage. 2014;94:396–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Frassle S, Harrison SJ, Heinzle J, et al. Regression dynamic causal modeling for resting-state fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42(7):2159–2180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Frassle S, Stephan KE. Test-retest reliability of regression dynamic causal modeling. Netw Neurosci. 2022;6(1):135–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Royer J, Rodríguez-Cruces R, Tavakol S, et al. An open MRI dataset for multiscale neuroscience. Sci Data. 2022;9(1):569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rodriguez-Cruces R, Bernhardt BC, Concha L. Multidimensional associations between cognition and connectome organization in temporal lobe epilepsy. NeuroImage. 2020;213:116706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Weng Y, Lariviere S, Caciagli L, et al. Macroscale and microcircuit dissociation of focal and generalized human epilepsies. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bernasconi N, Bernasconi A, Caramanos Z, Antel SB, Andermann F, Arnold DL. Mesial temporal damage in temporal lobe epilepsy: a volumetric MRI study of the hippocampus, amygdala and parahippocampal region. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 2):462–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cruces RR, Royer J, Herholz P, et al. Micapipe: a pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging and connectome analysis. NeuroImage. 2022;263:119612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cox RW. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res. 1996;29(3):162–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):782–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fischl B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):774–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage. 2011;54(3):2033–2044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA, et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage. 2013;80:105–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Van Essen DC, Glasser MF, Dierker DL, Harwell J, Coalson T. Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(10):2241–2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Larivière S, Weng Y, Vos de Wael R, et al. Functional connectome contractions in temporal lobe epilepsy: Microstructural underpinnings and predictors of surgical outcome. Epilepsia. 2020;61(6):1221–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hong SJ, Hyung B, Paquola C, Bernhardt BC. The superficial white matter in autism and its role in connectivity anomalies and symptom severity. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29(10):4415–4425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Salimi-Khorshidi G, Douaud G, Beckmann CF, Glasser MF, Griffanti L, Smith SM. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. NeuroImage. 2014;90:449–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Greve DN, Fischl B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. NeuroImage. 2009;48(1):63–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC, et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature. 2016;536(7615):171–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Vos de Wael R, Benkarim O, Paquola C, et al. BrainSpace: a toolbox for the analysis of macroscale gradients in neuroimaging and connectomics datasets. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Park B-y, Park H, Morys F, et al. Inter-individual body mass variations relate to fractionated functional brain hierarchies. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Coifman RR, Lafon S, Lee AB, et al. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: Diffusion maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(21):7426–7431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Langs G, Golland P, Ghosh SS. Predicting activation across individuals with resting-state functional connectivity based multi-atlas label fusion. Springer International Publishing; 2015:313–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, Behrens TEJ, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview. NeuroImage. 2013;80:62–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Park B-y, Larivière S, Rodríguez-Cruces R, et al. Topographic divergence of atypical cortical asymmetry and atrophy patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain. 2021;145(4):1285–1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wang Y, Royer J, Park BY, et al. Long-range functional connections mirror and link microarchitectural and cognitive hierarchies in the human brain. Cereb Cortex. 2022;33(5):1782–1798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Liu M, Bernhardt BC, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N. Gray matter structural compromise is equally distributed in left and right temporal lobe epilepsy. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37(2):515–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Larivière S, Bayrak Ş, Vos de Wael R, et al. BrainStat: A toolbox for brain-wide statistics and multimodal feature associations. NeuroImage. 2023;266:119807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995;57(1):289–300. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ji JL, Spronk M, Kulkarni K, Repovš G, Anticevic A, Cole MW. Mapping the human brain’s cortical-subcortical functional network organization. NeuroImage. 2019;185:35–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Alexander-Bloch AF, Shou H, Liu S, et al. On testing for spatial correspondence between maps of human brain structure and function. NeuroImage. 2018;178:540–551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lariviere S, Paquola C, Park B-y, et al. The ENIGMA Toolbox: multiscale neural contextualization of multisite neuroimaging datasets. Nat Methods. 2021;18:698–700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Váša F, Mišić B. Null models in network neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022;23(8):493–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Frässle S, Aponte EA, Bollmann S, et al. TAPAS: An open-source software package for translational neuromodeling and computational psychiatry. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:680811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zuo XN, Ehmke R, Mennes M, et al. Network centrality in the human functional connectome. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(8):1862–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lutz MT, Helmstaedter C . EpiTrack: Tracking cognitive side effects of medication on attention and executive functions in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;7(4):708–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Han L, Kashyap AL, Finin T, Mayfield J, Weese J. UMBC_EBIQUITY-CORE: Semantic textual similarity systems. 2013:44–52. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tavakol S, Li Q, Royer J, et al. A structure–function substrate of memory for spatial configurations in medial and lateral temporal cortices. Cereb Cortex. 2021;31(7):3213–3225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Rodriguez-Cruces R, Velázquez-Pérez L, Rodríguez-Leyva I, et al. Association of white matter diffusion characteristics and cognitive deficits in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;79:138–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yarkoni T, Poldrack RA, Nichols TE, Van Essen DC, Wager TD. Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat Methods. 2011;8(8):665–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Power JD, Mitra A, Laumann TO, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage. 2014;84:320–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Murphy K, Birn RM, Bandettini PA. Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup. NeuroImage. 2013;80:349–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sormaz M, Jefferies E, Bernhardt BC, et al. Knowing what from where: Hippocampal connectivity with temporoparietal cortex at rest is linked to individual differences in semantic and topographic memory. NeuroImage. 2017;152:400–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Smallwood J, Bernhardt BC, Leech R, Bzdok D, Jefferies E, Margulies DS. The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22(8):503–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Park C-h Choi YS, Jung AR, et al. Seizure control and memory impairment are related to disrupted brain functional integration in temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017;29(4):343–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Chiang S, Haneef Z. Graph theory findings in the pathophysiology of temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(7):1295–1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lucas A, Cornblath EJ, Sinha N, et al. Resting state functional connectivity demonstrates increased segregation in bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2023; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Chen Y, Wang S, Hilgetag CC, Zhou C. Features of spatial and functional segregation and integration of the primate connectome revealed by trade-off between wiring cost and efficiency. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(9):e1005776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Doucet G, Osipowicz K, Sharan A, Sperling MR, Tracy JI. Extratemporal functional connectivity impairments at rest are related to memory performance in mesial temporal epilepsy. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(9):2202–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Liao W, Zhang Z, Pan Z, et al. Default mode network abnormalities in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: A study combining fMRI and DTI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32(6):883–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Pittau F, Grova C, Moeller F, Dubeau F, Gotman J. Patterns of altered functional connectivity in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2012;53(6):1013–1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Burman RJ, Parrish RR. The widespread network effects of focal epilepsy. J Neurosci. 2018;38(38):8107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Tavakol S, Royer J, Lowe AJ, et al. Neuroimaging and connectomics of drug-resistant epilepsy at multiple scales: From focal lesions to macroscale networks. Epilepsia. 2019;60(4):593–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(12):683–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Narasimhan S, Kundassery KB, Gupta K, et al. Seizure-onset regions demonstrate high inward directed connectivity during resting-state: An SEEG study in focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2020;61(11):2534–2544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.van Mierlo P, Carrette E, Hallez H, et al. Ictal-onset localization through connectivity analysis of intracranial EEG signals in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2013;54(8):1409–1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Coito A, Genetti M, Pittau F, et al. Altered directed functional connectivity in temporal lobe epilepsy in the absence of interictal spikes: A high density EEG study. Epilepsia. 2016;57(3):402–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Coito A, Michel CM, Vulliemoz S, Plomp G. Directed functional connections underlying spontaneous brain activity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(3):879–888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Müller PM, Meisel C. Spatial and temporal correlations in human cortex are inherently linked and predicted by functional hierarchy, vigilance state as well as antiepileptic drug load. PLoS computational biology. 2023;19(3):e1010919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Khambhati AN, Davis KA, Lucas TH, Litt B, Bassett DS. Virtual cortical resection reveals push-pull network control preceding seizure evolution. Neuron. 2016;91(5):1170–1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Xiao Fan W, Guanrong C. Synchronization in scale-free dynamical networks: robustness and fragility. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Fundam. 2002;49(1):54–62. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Johnson GW, Doss DJ, Morgan VL, et al. The Interictal Suppression Hypothesis in focal epilepsy: network-level supporting evidence. Brain. 2023:awad016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Concha L, Kim H, Bernasconi A, Bernhardt BC, Bernasconi N. Spatial patterns of water diffusion along white matter tracts in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2012;79(5):455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Bernhardt BC, Fadaie F, Vos de Wael R, et al. Preferential susceptibility of limbic cortices to microstructural damage in temporal lobe epilepsy: A quantitative T1 mapping study. NeuroImage. 2018;182:294–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Shafiei G, Markello RD, Makowski C, et al. Spatial patterning of tissue volume loss in schizophrenia reflects brain network architecture. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;87(8):727–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Shafiei G, Bazinet V, Dadar M, et al. Network structure and transcriptomic vulnerability shape atrophy in frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2022;146(1):321–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.García-Cabezas MÁ, Zikopoulos B, Barbas H. The Structural Model: a theory linking connections, plasticity, pathology, development and evolution of the cerebral cortex. Brain Struct Funct. 2019;224(3):985–1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Xie K, Royer J, Lariviere S, et al. Atypical intrinsic neural timescales in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2023;64(4):998–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Galovic M, van Dooren VQH, Postma T, et al. Progressive cortical thinning in patients with focal epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(10):1230–1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Coan AC, Appenzeller S, Bonilha L, Li LM, Cendes F. Seizure frequency and lateralization affect progression of atrophy in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2009;73(11):834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Caciagli L, Bernasconi A, Wiebe S, Koepp MJ, Bernasconi N, Bernhardt BC. A meta-analysis on progressive atrophy in intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: Time is brain? Neurology. 2017;89(5):506–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Pardoe HR, Berg AT, Jackson GD. Sodium valproate use is associated with reduced parietal lobe thickness and brain volume. Neurology. 2013;80(20):1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Park HJ, Friston K. Structural and functional brain networks: from connections to cognition. Science. 2013;342(6158):1238411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Shine JM, Breakspear M, Bell PT, et al. Human cognition involves the dynamic integration of neural activity and neuromodulatory systems. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(2):289–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Bijsterbosch J, Harrison SJ, Jbabdi S, et al. Challenges and future directions for representations of functional brain organization. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(12):1484–1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Buckner RL, DiNicola LM. The brain’s default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20(10):593–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Buckner RL, Wheeler ME. The cognitive neuroscience og remembering. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(9):624–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Moscovitch M, Cabeza R, Winocur G, Nadel L. Episodic memory and beyond: the hippocampus and neocortex in transformation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Alessio A, Pereira FRS, Sercheli MS, et al. Brain plasticity for verbal and visual memories in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis: An fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(1):186–199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Sidhu MK, Stretton J, Winston GP, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study mapping the episodic memory encoding network in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain. 2013;136(6):1868–1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Oligschlager S, Huntenburg JM, Golchert J, Lauckner ME, Bonnen T, Margulies DS. Gradients of connectivity distance are anchored in primary cortex. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222(5):2173–2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Buckner RL, Krienen FM. The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(12):648–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The Human Connectome Project dataset is available under https://db.humanconnectome.org/. MICA-MICs dataset51 is available under the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform Data Portal (https://portal.conp.ca/) and the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/j532r/). Surface-based functional connectome gradients will be available on osf.io.