Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2019 May 3;32(2):163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2019.05.001

Hereditary Myeloid Malignancies

Hind Rafei 1, Courtney D DiNardo 2
PMCID: PMC10246934  NIHMSID: NIHMS1903157  PMID: 31203998

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia are sporadic for the majority of cases affecting the elderly population. Inherited cases, however, do occur. Genetic predispositions to myeloid malignancies can be classified into three categories: familial cancer syndromes associated with increased risk of various malignancies including myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome and constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD); germline mutations conferring a specific increased risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia such as mutations in ANKRD26, CEBPA, DDX41, ETV6, GATA2, RUNX1, SRP72 genes; and finally primarily pediatric inherited bone marrow failure syndromes such as Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, severe congenital neutropenia, Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and Diamond Blackfan anemia. The recognition of these germline syndromes is essential in the management and follow-up of patients. Herein, we review the conditions associated with hereditary myeloid leukemia with a special clinical focus on management and monitoring.

Keywords: Myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, germline, predisposition, hereditary, familial, genetic, bone marrow failure

Introduction

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) present primarily as sporadic diseases affecting the elderly, with a median age of ≥ 65 years at presentation and increasing incidence with age in adulthood (1). However, there is increasing appreciation that hematologic malignancies can also be inherited and can be associated with specific familial syndromes. Awareness and evaluation, particularly of younger patients or those with positive family history, is important for the optimal care of patients. The primarily solid cancer predisposition syndromes associated with an increased risk of myeloid malignancies include Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD), Werner syndrome, Bloom syndrome, Nijmegen breakage syndromes, neurofibromatosis 1, as well as others.

In addition to cancer predisposition syndromes, there are specific inherited bone marrow failure syndromes which are associated with an increased risk of hematologic malignancy, particularly including the myeloid disorders MDS and AML (2). Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by bone marrow failure often in childhood or adolescence, congenital abnormalities, and increased risk of malignancy (3). The tendency to develop MDS/AML varies between the different syndromes, with Fanconi anemia (FA) carrying the highest risk (4) and others such as severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) (5) dyskeratosis congenita (DC), Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) and Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA) generally have lower or intermediate risks (68).

With the advent of precision medicine, a growing number of genes causing inherited forms of MDS/AML, often without syndromic presentations and occurring across different age groups, are now recognized. Studies suggest that around 4–10% of children and young adults with MDS or AML (911) and roughly similar percentages of adults with AML (12) may carry inherited mutations in genes predisposing to cancer. The genes implicated in myeloid malignancies are diverse, including hematopoietic transcription factors such as CEBPA, GATA2, RUNX1, ANKRD26, and ETV6, genes traditionally associated with solid tumors such as MSH6 and BRCA1, as well as more recently identified genes that are involved in leukemogenesis such as DDX41, SAMD9 and SAMD9L (1316).

Herein, we review the various inherited cancer predisposition syndromes associated with MDS/AML as well as the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. We also discuss the genetic aberrations associated with these disorders.

Molecular Aberrations Associated with Familial Myeloid Malignancies

Although most MDS and AML cases are sporadic, a subset may be familial (17). The 2016 WHO classification acknowledges AML and other myeloid neoplasms that are associated with germline mutations or a predisposition syndrome. A number of known mutations are associated with familial MDS/AML including mutations in the ANKRD26, CEBPA, DDX41, ETV6, GATA2, RUNX1, SRP72 genes (Table 1).

Table 1:

Genetic predisposition to MDS/AML

Gene Syndrome Hematologic malignancies Other hematologic manifestations Nonhematologic manifestations
CEBPA Familial AML with mutated CEBPA
DDX1 Familial AML with mutated DDX41 MDS, CMML
RUNX1 Familial platelet disorder with propensity to myeloid malignancies MDS, T-ALL Thrombocytopenia, bleeding propensity Eczema
ANKRD26 Thrombocytopenia 2 MDS Thrombocytopenia, bleeding propensity
ETV6 Thrombocytopenia 5 MDS, CMML, B-ALL, PCM Thrombocytopenia Possible Risk for solid tumors
GATA2 Familial MDS/AML with mutated GATA2 MDS, CMML MonoMAC syndrome Lymphedema, hearing loss, extragenital warts
SRP72 SRP72-associated familial aplasia and myelodysplasia MDS Aplastic anemia Deafness
SAMD9 MIRAGE syndrome MDS Infections, intrauterine growth restrictions, adrenal hypoplasia, enteropathy
SAMD9L Ataxia-pancytopenia syndrome MDS Pancytopenia Neurological deficits

- ANKRD26

ANKRD26-related thrombocytopenia (ANKRD26-RT) is an autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia caused by gain-of-function single nucleotide substitutions in the ankyrin repeat domain 26 (ANKRD26) gene, typically in the promoter region (18). ANKRD26-RT presents with moderate thrombocytopenia with a normal mean platelet volume. The age of diagnosis commonly ranges from the early 20s through the 70s; pediatric patients aged 2 to 16 years have also been reported (19, 20). Spontaneous bleeding is rare, and a number of patients have undergone surgeries without need for platelet transfusion, and most women in the studied families gave birth without bleeding complications (20).There are reports of partial responses to immune thrombocytopenia-directed therapies (19). Around 222 cases of ANKRD26-RT have been reported to date. These patient have an increased incidence of myeloid malignancies, estimated at 5% acute leukemia development, 2.2% MDS, and 1.3% developing CML, yielding an estimated risk of these malignancies that is 23-fold, 12-fold, and 21-fold higher than the general population, respectively (21).

- CEBPA

Familial AML with mutated CRBPA is an autosomal dominant familial AML syndrome with near complete penetrance, caused by germline mutations in the CCAAT enhancer binding protein-alpha (CEBPA). At the time of AML development, a somatic CEBPA mutation frequently occurs on the other allele (22) leading to bi-allelic CEBPA mutations. CEBPA-associated familial AML presents at a median age of 24.5 years (22). The presentation is, however, variable. A case of AML in monozygotic twins carrying the same germline CEBPA mutation, whose age at onset of AML differed by 13 years, has been reported (23). Survival outcomes are generally favorable, with recurrence typically caused by independent leukemic episodes (24).

- GATA2

GATA2 haploinsufficiency is an autosomal dominant bone marrow failure and primary immunodeficiency syndrome that predisposes to MDS and AML. It is caused by loss-of-function mutations or deletions in the GATA2 gene. It is associated with a spectrum of described syndromes including Emberger syndrome (Primary Lymphedema and Myelodysplasia), MONOMAC syndrome (monocytopenia and mycobacterial infection syndrome), and DCML (dendritic cell, monocytes, B and NK lymphoid deficiency) (2529). GATA2 is a zinc finger transcription factor that is essential in hematopoiesis (30). A cohort of 57 patients with GATA2 haploinsufficiency was reported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (25). The median age of initial presentation was 20 years (5 months to 78 years). The patients’ presenting symptoms ranged from viral infections in 32% of cases, disseminated non-tuberculosis mycobacterial infections in 28%, MDS/AML in 21%, lymphedema in 9%, and invasive fungal infections in 4%. Cardinal findings in GATA2 haploinsufficiency include: severe viral or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections, MDS/AML, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, or lymphedema (25).

Some patients might also present with mild congenital neutropenia (31). Progression to myelodysplasia in GATA2 haploinsufficiency is frequently associated with monosomy 7 and trisomy 8 (25), as well as acquisition of somatic ASXL1 mutations in ~30% of patients (32).

- RUNX1

RUNX1-associated familial platelet disorder with predisposition to MDS/AML (FPD/AML) is an autosomal dominant familial MDS/AML syndrome caused by inherited mutations in the RUNX1 gene that encodes a hematopoietic transcription factor (33). RUNX1 mutations lead to reduced hematopoietic progenitors and impaired differentiation of megakaryocytes (34). The clinical presentation and course are highly variable. The age at presentation ranges from early childhood into the sixth decade (35, 36). There is commonly a history of thrombocytopenia accompanied by a mild to moderate bleeding tendency with aspirin-like platelet dysfunction. The rate of MDS/AML transformation in FPD/AML is estimated at 20–60%, with high variability even among families carrying the same mutation (37, 38).

- SRP72

Mutations in SRP72 lead to an autosomal dominant bone marrow failure syndrome; SRP72-associated aplasia and myelodysplasia. SRP72 is part of the signal recognition particle that is responsible of halting the translation of nascent secretory or extracellular proteins and directing them to the endoplasmic reticulum. Mutations in SRP72 lead to a decrease in the localization of the mutant protein in the endoplasmic reticulum and is a pathway for bone marrow failure and MDS. Mutations in SRP72 were detected in two kindreds with aplasia and MDS; both families had auditory abnormalities (labyrinthitis in one family and deafness in another). The age at onset of cytopenias and/or MDS ranges from 11 to 76 years (39).

- DDX41

DDX41-associated familial MDS/AML syndrome is an autosomal-dominant syndrome often presenting in mid to late adulthood, caused by germline mutations in the DEAD-Box helicase DDX41, leading to altered pre-mRNA splicing and RNA processing (16). DDX41-associated familial MDS/AML presents later in adulthood with an age at presentation ranging from 44 to 88 years, which notably overlaps with the average age of sporadic myeloid malignancies. Approximately half of patients had biallelic DDX41 mutations with a second somatic event in the wild type allele, at specific recurrent hotspots. Additional somatic mutations were frequently found, most commonly mutations in TP53, RUNX1, and LUC7L2 (16).

- ETV6

Germline mutations in the ETS family transcriptional repressor variant 6 (ETV6) cause altered DNA binding and ETV6 protein mislocalization, and are associated with familial thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancy (40, 41). ETV6 is a tumor suppressor frequently mutated by somatic alterations, such as the ETV6-RUNX1 fusion commonly seen in childhood leukemia. In contrast, patients with germline ETV6 mutations typically present with bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and red cell macrocytosis (40, 41). Hereditary hematologic malignancies associated with familial cases include ALL, MDS RAEB-1, CMML, mixed phenotype acute leukemia, and multiple myeloma. There also appears to be a predisposition to other types of cancers such as skin and colon cancer (4042).

Syndromes associated with myeloid malignancies (Table 2)

Table 2:

Cancer predisposition syndromes

Syndrome Mechanism Inheritance Gene(s) Characteristics Diagnostic Test Risk of MDS/AML
Bloom Syndrome DNA repair AR BLM Short stature, immunodeficiency, microcephaly, highpitched voice, hypogonadism gene sequencing 15–25%
Li-Fraumeni Syndrome TP53 AD TP53, CHEK2 Cancer predisposition gene sequencing 8%
Neurofibromatosis Type I Ras signaling AD NF1, SPRED1 café-au-lait spots, axillary/inguinal freckling, neurofibromas, Lisch nodules, optic gliomas, bony dysplasia gene sequencing <1%
Noonan Syndrome Ras signaling AD PTPN11, KRAS, RAF1, SOS1, CBL Short stature, facial dysmorphology, congenital heart defect gene sequencing Unknown

AD: autosomal dominant; AR: autosomal recessive; XLR: X-linked recessive

- Li-Fraumeni Syndrome

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is caused by germline mutations in in the TP53 gene which leads to strong predisposition to various and primarily solid malignancies (43). LFS affects all ethnicities and has an estimated incidence of 1:5000 (44). LFS is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern but can also occur de novo at a rate of 7–20% (45).

The tendency to develop malignancies in LFS stems from the central role that the p53 protein, encoded by the TP53 gene, plays in the control of cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis (46, 47). This role confers a well-known tumor suppressor function to p53, which is often referred to as the “guardian of the genome” (48, 49). Patients with LFS are predisposed to a wide variety of cancers including breast cancer, sarcomas of the bone and soft tissues, adrenocortical carcinoma, brain cancers, and leukemia (50). Nearly 100% of individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome develop cancer by the age of 70, with the median age of first cancer at 20–30 years, and about 50% develop a second primary cancer within 10 years of their first cancer diagnosis (51).

The incidence of leukemia in patients with LFS is about 2–4% (5254). Germline TP53 mutations occur in high rates in certain leukemia subsets, particularly pediatric low hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), defined as ALL containing 32–39 chromosomes (55). In TP53 mutations carriers, myeloid malignancies and MDS are more likely to present as secondary cancers following the treatment of primary neoplasms although they can less likely be the presenting clinical manifestation (56). Testing for LFS should be considered in patients with hypodiploid ALL, as well as patients with myeloid malignancies and a strong family history that meet either the classic or the Chompret criteria for LFS (54, 57, 58). Testing can also be considered when myeloid malignancies develop following treatment for a primary cancer such as bone and soft tissue sarcoma, brain cancer, or breast cancer in younger individuals, etc. The management of patients with LFS and a myeloid malignancy includes limiting the exposure to radiation therapy if possible. When necessary, for example as part of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), radiated sites need to be closely and regularly monitored for the development of site-specific radiation-induced neoplasms. Relatives should be screened for the presence of a familial TP53 mutation prior to donor selection for HSCT. Ideally, tumor surveillance including annual MRI in those individuals should start in childhood (59).

- Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome

Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) (also known as biallelic mismatch repair deficiency [BMMRD]) is caused by biallelic mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and, rarely, EPCAM. Heterozygous mutations in these genes cause Lynch syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder that predisposes to adult-onset cancers, including colorectal, endometrial, breast cancers and others (60, 61). In contrast, when an individual inherits either homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in an MMR gene, the autosomal dominant CMMRD syndrome occurs.

CMMRD confers a very high risk of cancer development in childhood and adulthood as well as characteristic physical features such as café-au-lait spots and skin-fold freckling. These manifestations can mimic those exhibited by individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF 1) (62). Various cancers have been reported with CMMRD with the majority of affected patients diagnosed with their first malignancy in childhood (62, 63). In a report of 146 patients with this disease by the European Consortium “Care for CMMRD”, 217 malignancies were documented, among which 2.3% were accounted for by AML (64). Other common tumors included colorectal cancer (27.2%), high-grade glioma (26.7%), lymphoma (14.7%), and small bowel cancer (8.3%). Another report of 56 patients with CMMRD assessed 62 hematological malignancies of which 10 myeloid malignancies were reported in 9 patients (16% of reported hematologic malignancies) (65). Two of the nine patients with myeloid malignancies (one with AML and the other with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia [CML]) presented with primary leukemia. Another patient developed refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) following treatment for medulloblastoma and then progressed to AML. The remaining 6 had AML secondary to the treatment of non-hematological malignancies. Tumors of individuals with CMMRD tend to express an exceedingly high mutational burden, thus the diagnosis should be considered in tumors with high mutated phenotypes (i.e. “MSI high phenotype”) and there are several recent reports of response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in resistant cases(66, 67).

Patients with hematological malignancies associated with CMMRD tend to tolerate chemotherapy well without experiencing excessive treatment toxicity (65). However, they appear to have a high relapse rate as well as predisposition to secondary malignancies (68). Experts recommend the initiation of multisystem surveillance early in childhood for patients with CMMRD, including early brain imaging, gastrointestinal surveillance, and blood screening for hematologic malignancies (64, 69).

- Werner Syndrome

Werner syndrome, also known as “adult progeria”, is a syndrome of premature aging caused by biallelic mutations in the WRN gene and inherited in an autosomal recessive fashion (70, 71). The prevalence of Werner’s syndrome is estimated at 1:380,000–1,000,000 (72) with higher prevalence in Japanese (1:20,000–40,000) and Sardinian populations (1:50,000) due to founder mutations (73, 74). WRN, the Werner syndrome RecQ-like helicase protein, plays a role in senescence-associated pathways, which may account for the premature aging phenotype that is observed in patients with Werner syndrome (75).

Patients with Werner syndrome develop normally during the first decade of life with absence of a growth spurt in the teenage years. Clinical features do not commonly start to appear before the 20s (70). The cardinal features present in all individuals with Werner’s syndrome include bilateral cataracts, premature graying/thinning of the hair, scleroderma-like skin changes, and short stature. The presence of ulcerations around the Achilles tendon and malleoli is pathognomonic. Patients with Werner’s syndrome tend to develop other comorbidities including osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, and atherosclerosis; causing a short life expectancy averaging mid-40s as patients die as a result of atherosclerosis or malignancies (70).

Malignancies associated with Werner’ syndrome include hematological neoplasms (9.3% of all tumors) including AML and MDS (76), thyroid tumors (16.1%), melanoma (13.3%), meningioma (10.9%), sarcomas (10.1%) and osteosarcoma (7.7%) (76). There appears also to be a susceptibility to breast cancer as some suggested that variants in WRN function as low-penetrance cancer predisposition alleles in the heterozygous state (77, 78).

Counseling parents and patients about the risk of malignancies and comorbidities play a crucial role in the care of patients with Werner’s syndrome. Individuals should be screened yearly for type 2 diabetes, ocular pathology and lipid abnormalities. Tumor surveillance is currently limited to annual physical examination with special attention to the skin (79). Treatment is mainly supportive with a multidisciplinary approach including ophthalmology, orthopedics, and endocrinology services.

- Bloom Syndrome

Bloom syndrome is a rare genetic syndrome with hundreds cases reported to-date worldwide (80). It is caused by biallelic mutations in the BLM gene (81, 82). It is more common in Ashkenazi Jews of Polish descent due to the presence of a founder mutation (83). If molecular testing is inconclusive, cytogenetic evaluation of sister-chromatid exchanges (SCEs) might help (80). Bloom syndrome patients have a short stature and the majority have characteristic skin lesions including an erythematous butterfly-shaped facial rash over the cheeks and nose (84). They can also have early-onset feeding difficulties that may be present through young childhood, and immunodeficiency, which can cause recurrent infections. Men with Bloom syndrome are infertile and women undergo premature menopause (84).

Cancer risk is high in Bloom syndrome and is the leading cause of death in this patient population. In a report from the Bloom Syndrome Registry of 131 patients, AML represented 12.5% of all tumors (80). Other tumors include lymphoma (16.9%), GI cancers (15%), skin cancer (13%), and cancers of upper GI and respiratory tract (10.6%). There are 23 cases of MDS reported to-date in the Bloom Syndrome Registry with leukemia progression in seven individuals. Twenty of these 23 patients were treated for prior malignancies with chemotherapy, suggesting that the risk for MDS in this population may be largely treatment-related. Chromosome 7 anomalies including full and partial deletions are common cytogenetic abnormalities in these AML and MDS patients (85).

In patients who develop malignancies, special consideration should be given to the dose of radiation and type of chemotherapy given due to the high sensitivity in these individuals to DNA-damaging agents.

- Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome

Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS) is caused by biallelic mutations in the NBN gene (86). It is a rare syndrome with an estimated prevalence of 1:100,000 individuals affected worldwide (87). It is more common in individuals of Slavic descent tracing ancestry to Eastern European countries such as Poland, Ukraine, and the Czech Republic due to the presence of a founder mutation (87). The syndrome is mainly due to deficiency in nibrin which leads to increased cellular radiosensitivity and chromosome instability (88).

NBS is associated with characteristic physical features, including progressive microcephaly, short stature, café-au-lait macules, and distinctive facial features including a receding forehead, prominent midface, retrognathia, epicanthal folds, and upslanting palpebral fissures. Patients may also have immunodeficiency and cognitive deficits (89). Primary ovarian insufficiency could occur in females (90). Aplastic anemia has been reported in a small number of affected individuals (91).

There is a substantial increase in the risk of malignancy in patients affected with NBS with 40% occurring by the second decade of life. Lymphoma accounts for the majority of reported malignancies, with other cancers including acute leukemia (mostly lymphoblastic although myeloid has been reported), brain tumors and sarcomas being reported as well (42).

While reduced dosage of chemotherapy in the management of NBS-associated malignancies is a reasonable consideration due to the known increased risk of treatment toxicity as is the case with other DNA repair syndromes, it, however, has not been effective in achieving remission in this patient population (92). HSCT has been successfully performed for treatment-resistant hematologic malignancies (93).

- Down Syndrome

Individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) have various developmental abnormalities, including craniofacial dysmorphology, cardiovascular defects and cognitive impairment. Paradoxically, individuals with DS have a decreased frequency of solid tumors (9496), but a higher incidence of leukemia (10–20 fold) (97). There is a well-defined preceding transient myeloproliferative disorder (TMD), also called transient leukemia (TL), occurring in the neonatal period in 10% of infants with DS (98100). TMD is a clonal preleukemic evolution characterized by an accumulation of immature megakaryoblasts in the fetal liver and peripheral blood (101). Children with DS who are younger than 4 years have a 500-fold increased incidence of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL, also known as ML-DS) (101). It is thought that trisomy 21 directly contributes to the malignant transformation of hematopoietic cells. In addition, somatic mutations of the GATA1 gene have been detected in nearly all DS AMKL cases and are notably absent in non-DS AMKL.

Treatment of patients with DS-associated AML with high dose cytarabine and anthracycline-based therapy showed an increased sensitivity to this regimen with a significantly greater event-free survival (EFS) compared to non-DS AML patients (3-year EFS 100% in DS-AML compared to 33% in non-DS AML) (102). However, intensive regimen has been shown to be associated with increased toxicity and mortality in subsequent trials, as have autologous and allogeneic transplant (103). AMKL has been treated on protocols with conventional (104) or high dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) with reported 3-year overall survival (OS) greater than 80%. However, high dose Ara-C was associated with increased risk of toxicity (105107). Low dose subcutaneous Ara-C induced remission in almost all cases of AMKL and complicated TMD with 5-year EFS and OS similar with standard chemotherapy (108110). Due to the limitations of toxic deaths, infections, and cardiac toxicity in treating DS-AMKL, newer, less-intensive protocols have been conducted in the United States, Japan and Europe (105, 111).

- Leopard/Noonan Syndrome

Noonan syndrome (NS) is a relatively common (1/2000 births) developmental disorder characterized by reduced postnatal growth, congenital heart defects and cardiomyopathy, variable cognitive deficits, and distinctive facial dysmorphism (112). NS has an equal male to female ratio (113, 114). Familial cases correspond to approximately 20% of the cases and exhibit primarily an autosomal dominant inheritance with a near complete penetrance (115, 116).

Germline mutations in components of the RAS-MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of NS and of four rare syndromes with NS overlapping features: Leopard syndrome, cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome (CFC), Costello syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) (117).

NS patients have an increased risk of developing several types of malignancies (112, 118) including myeloproliferative disorders (MPN) resembling juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia (JMML) (119). JMML is a rare and aggressive myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasm of early childhood, associated with excessive monocytic and macrophagic proliferation (120). Patients typically present with anemia, thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, monocytosis, and elevated fetal hemoglobin (HbF) (121). JMML is characterized by the hypersensitivity of myeloid progenitors to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (122). Sporadic JMML has a poor prognosis and the only curative treatment is allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, with a relapse rate of 30– 40%. However, NS-related JMML is often benign and may even resolve spontaneously within one year of presentation (119, 123127).

Most patients with NS and MPN harbor a PTPN11 mutation (126, 128) and about 35% of sporadic JMML cases display an acquired somatic PTPN11 mutation. PTPN11 encodes the cytoplasmic phosphatase SHP2, which enhances the signal transduction of growth factors and cytokines by upregulating RAS/MAPK pathway activation (129).

- Neurofibromatosis I

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder, characterized by the development of peripheral nerve sheath tumors called neurofibromas. Patients affected with NF1 also have café-au-lait macules, skeletal anomalies, and cognitive deficits. Despite the low incidence of malignancy in NF1, cancer remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. While neurofibromas are benign tumors, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) may also occur. In addition, gliomas, particularly pilocytic astrocytomas of the optic nerve, and leukemia, have an increased frequency in NF1 (130). The gene involved in NF1 encodes a protein called neurofibromin (130133). Although the function of neurofibromin is not completely understood, it is known to include a GTPase activating protein (GAP) domain that regulates hydrolysis of Ras-GTP to Ras-GDP (134137).

Children with NF1 have an increased prevalence of myeloid leukemia (138). A population-based study found an increased relative risk of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the NF1 population. Juvenile xanthogranuloma (JXG) which is a form of histiocytosis manifesting as cutaneous nodules is found with increased frequency in children with NF1 and also has been correlated with risk of juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia (JCML) in the general population (139). This however has not been validated and hence it is not clear that there is clinical benefit to closely observe of children with NF1 and JXG for leukemia. In contrast with many non-NF1-associated myeloid malignancies, leukemic cells from NF1 patients have loss of heterozygosity for the NF1 gene but do not have activating Ras mutations (140) . Increased levels of Ras-GTP are found in the NF1-associated leukemias (141) which show an increased sensitivity to GM-CSF and other cytokines (142).

Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes (Table 3)

Table 3:

Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes

Syndrome Mechanism Inheritance Gene(s) Characteristics Diagnostic Test Risk of MDS/AML
Diamond-Blackfan Anemia Ribosome biogenesis AD, XLR RPS19, RPS17, RPS24, RPL35A, RPL5, RPL11, RPS7, RPS26, RPS10, GATA1 Short stature, congenital anomalies (head and neck, cardiac, thumb) Elevated erythrocyte adenosine deaminase and HgF; gene sequencing 1–20%
Dyskeratosis Congenita Telomere maintenance XLR, AD, AR DKC1, TERT, TERC, TINF2, RTEL1, NOP10, NHP2, WRAP53, CTC1, PARN Nail dystrophy, lacy skin pigmentation, oral leukoplakia, pulmonary fibrosis, hepatic fibrosis, cancer predisposition Telomere lengths; gene sequencing 30%
Fanconi Anemia Homologous DNA repair, impaired tolerance of reactive metabolites AR, XLR FANCA, FANCC, FANCD1/BRCA2, FANCD2, FANCE,FANCF, FANCG/XRCC9, FANCI, FANCJ/BACH1/BRIP1, FANCL, FANCM, FANCN/PALB2, FANCO/RAD51C,FANCP/SLX4, FANCQ(ERCC4), FANCB Radial anomalies, caféau-lait spots, short stature, microcephaly, GU anomalies, hip dysplasia, cancer predisposition Chromosome breakage studies; gene sequencing 40%
Severe Congenital Neutropenia Various AR ELA2, HAX1, GFI1 Neutropenia, frequent Infections gene sequencing 10%
Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome Ribosome biogenesis AR SBDS Short stature, pancreatic insufficiency, skeletal abnormalities stool studies; gene sequencing 20–30%

AD: autosomal dominant; AR: autosomal recessive; XLR: X-linked recessive; GU: genitourinary

- Fanconi Anemia

Fanconi anemia (FA) is an autosomal or X-linked recessive inherited bone marrow failure syndrome characterized by growth retardation, congenital abnormalities, bone marrow failure with predisposition to AML, increased risk of other solid tumors (143). Congenital abnormalities include short stature, abnormal skin pigmentation, radial ray defects, and abnormalities of various organs, including arms, head, eyes, ears, and kidneys. However, it is important to note that 25–40% of patients lack physical abnormalities (144). The age at presentation is variable and spans the pediatric and adult age groups with a median age at diagnosis of 6.5 years for boys and 8 years for girls. The median age of development of bone marrow failure is 7 years (145). The cumulative incidence of bone marrow failure by the age of 40 is 90% and the median overall survival is 24 years (146).

Fifteen genes have been identified to be associated with FA (144). FANCA mutations are the most common. FANCB mutations confer an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern due to the location of FANCB on the X-chromosome (147). FA genes are involved in DNA crosslinks repair involved in the FA/BRCA pathway. FANCD1 is identical to BRCA2 with homozygous mutations leading to an increased susceptibility to breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer (148). MDS/AML that develops in the setting of FA tend to harbor certain cytogenetics more commonly, including +3q (41%), −7/7q (17%), and −11q (14%). Cryptic rearrangements of RUNX1, including translocations and deletions, as well as point mutations are also seen in ~21% of patients with FA (149). FA is diagnosed by the chromosome breakage test demonstrating an increased number of chromosomal breaks. HSCT offers the only cure for this condition. Sibling-matched transplantation is the preferred modality. Due to the high mortality with cyclophosphamide, reduced intensity conditioning regimens are preferred. Current data support the feasibility of reducing radiation dosages from the standard conditioning regimens in matched-unrelated donor transplants, and perhaps elimination of radiation in sibling-matched transplants (150).

- Dyskeratosis Congenita

Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome, often characterized by the triad of mucosal leukoplakia, abnormal skin pigmentation and nail dystrophy (151). Abnormalities of other organs include gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dental, ophthalmic, pulmonary, neurological, and skeletal and in particular hepatic and pulmonary fibrosis. Inheritance pattern can be X-linked, recessive, or autosomal dominant depending on the mutation. Genes identified to cause DC include CTC1, DKC1, TERC, TERT, TINF2, NHP2, NOP10, RTEL1, and WRAP53, although pathogenic germline mutations can be detected in only ~80% of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of DC. DKC1 encodes dyskerin, a highly conserved nucleolar protein (152), which is important in the process of ribosomal RNA maturation as well as stabilization of the telomerase complex, which in turns is critical in the maintenance of telomeres (153). Heterozygous mutations in TERC, TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase) and RTEL1 are often identified in adult patients with autosomal dominant dyskeratosis congenita and in some patients with aplastic anemia, MDS and pulmonary fibrosis (154, 155). Individuals with DC are at increased risk for MDS/AML, solid tumors (typically squamous cell carcinomas of the head, neck, anogenital tract), and pulmonary fibrosis. The median age at onset of MDS is 35 years (range 19–61) (2). Telomere length analysis in total leukocytes and a panel of six leukocyte subsets (granulocytes, naïve T-cells, memory T-cells, B-cells, and NK cells) by flow-FISH is recommended for the diagnosis of DC (156).

HSCT is the only cure for patients with bone marrow failure and MDS/AML in the setting of DC. However, there is an increased rate of complications in patients with DC undergoing HSCT, including graft failure, graft vs. host disease, sepsis, pulmonary fibrosis, hepatic cirrhosis, and veno-occulsive disease (157) so care for a non-myeloablative conditioning regimens are paramount.

- Ataxia-Pancytopenia Syndrome

Ataxia-pancytopenia syndrome (ATXPC) is an autosomal dominant disease of characteristic neurological deficits as well as hematological abnormalities. Neurological deficits include early-onset gait and balance impairment, nystagmus, mild pyramidal signs, and marked cerebellar atrophy. Hematological abnormalities include pancytopenia, bone marrow failure and progression into MDS and AML. Elimination of the germline SAMD9L mutation by loss of chromosome 7(q) can result in myeloid malignancies (158). ATXPC has so far been described in 5 families (14, 158161). Missense mutations in sterile alpha motif domain–containing protein 9-like (SAMD9L) have been identified as the cause of ATXPC in 4 of these families (14, 158161).

- MIRAGE Syndrome

MIRAGE syndrome is a multiorgan disorder characterized by six core features: bone marrow failure and myelodysplasia, infection, intrauterine growth restriction, adrenal hypoplasia, genital phenotypes and enteropathy (162) which has been recently recognized as related to heterozygous SAMD9 mutation. Chronic diarrhea with colonic dilatation was observed in almost all patients in previous reports (13, 162). It is caused by de novo germline heterozygous gain-of-function mutations in SAMD9, a growth-restricting protein that plays a major role in the development of many systems and leads to intrauterine growth retardation and a marked effect on adrenal gland and testes differentiation. Progressive loss of mutated SAMD9 through the development of monosomy 7 (–7), deletions of 7q (7q–), and secondary somatic loss-of-function (nonsense and frameshift) mutations in SAMD9 rescue the growth-restricting effects of mutant SAMD9 proteins in bone marrow and is associated with increased length of survival in one study (13).

- Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome

Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome (SDS) is an autosomal-recessive disorder, primarily diagnosed in childhood, characterized by malabsorption and failure to thrive. Patients also have abnormal physical findings including short stature, with metaphyseal dysostosis particularly at the hips and femurs in about half the patients. Some patients have cognitive deficits. Neutropenia is usually identified during the general evaluation (163). Other cytopenias and macrocytosis may be observed, and many patients evolve to aplastic anemia, MDS, or AML. The median age for the transformation to leukemia is 18 years, and the age-dependent cumulative probability of leukemia is greater than 70% (164).

The diagnosis of SDS relies on proving exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. This is demonstrated by reduced levels of serum trypsinogen and isoamylase and/or detection of a fatty pancreas by imaging (165). In addition, neutropenia below 1500/μL must be documented on more than one occasion (166). Patients with SDS often have bone marrow cytogenetic clones, particularly monosomy 7, der(7), and i(7q), as well as del(20q). The prognostic significance of the cytogenetic clones is unclear. More than 95% of patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for SDS have biallelic mutations in SBDS (Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome), a gene which plays a role in ribosome formation. Most mutations are due to gene conversion between the SBDS gene and an adjacent pseudogene. However, the reason for bone marrow failure in patients with SBDS mutations remains unclear (167, 168).

The management of patients with SDS is multifaceted and aims at improving malabsorption as well as close monitoring for the development of myelodysplasia. Malabsorption is treated by administration of pancreatic enzyme supplements and fat soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K). Pancreatic function often improves with age, and fewer or no supplements may be needed by adult patients. Neutropenia is rarely of clinical significance and usually improves with growth factors. Bone marrow function does not improve with age, and clonal cytogenetics, MDS, and leukemia may develop. HSCT has been successfully used for patients with SDS, although care should be taken as there is an increased risk of cardiac toxicity from preparative regimens that include cyclophosphamide (164).

- Severe Congenital Neutropenia

Severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) is a heterogeneous group of hematological diseases that are characterized by impaired maturation of neutrophil granulocytes. SCN patients are at increased risk for recurrent and often life-threatening infections beginning in their first months of life (169). SCN is most commonly caused by autosomal dominant mutations in ELANE, which encodes neutrophil elastase, and autosomal recessive mutations in HAX1, which contributes to the activation of the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor signaling pathway (170, 171). SCN is a bone marrow failure syndrome that predisposes to MDS and AML. Molecular events in the malignant progression include acquired mutations in CSF3R (encoding G-CSF receptor) and subsequently in other leukemia-associated genes (such as RUNX1) in a majority of patients (172). Diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations, blood neutrophil count, bone marrow examination, and genetic and immunological analyses. Daily subcutaneous G-CSF administration is the treatment of choice and leads to a substantial increase in blood neutrophils count, reduction of infections and drastic improvement of quality of life (173, 174). HSCT is the alternative treatment (175). Close clinical observation including yearly bone marrow evaluations to detect chromosomal abnormalities such as trisomy 21 and monosomy 7 as well as somatic leukemogenic mutations is highly recommended (164).

- Diamond-Blackfan Anemia

Diamond-Blackfan Anemia (DBA) is a bone marrow failure syndrome characterized by the diagnosis of anemia in utero, at birth or within the first year of life. While physical abnormalities might also be present including thumb abnormalities and short stature, the majority of patients have few or subtle abnormalities. Spontaneous remission happens in 20% of patients with DBA with no further need of corticosteroids or transfusions. Other patients might remain anemic and require HSCT (176). Patients with DBA have an estimated 5-fold increase risk of cancer, including osteogenic sarcoma, AML and colon cancer (8, 177).

Indications for HSCT in patients with DBA include refractory disease despite corticosteroids and transfusions or to avoid toxicities from steroids and iron overload from chronic transfusions.. There are no data on the use of reduced-intensity HSCT regimen and standard myeloablative regimens are recommended, however (178) iron overload post-HSCT is a major challenge. Monitoring post-SCT includes iron chelation as well as routine phlebotomy for an extended period, and MRI monitoring of heart and liver iron burdens. Another problem post-HSCT is development of malignancies but the small number of patients makes it difficult to determine whether this increased risk is significant (179).

Summary

Multiple hereditary predispositions to myeloid malignancies have been and continue to be identified, particularly in the setting of increasingly available and comprehensive genetic testing that is now integrated into the evaluation, prognostication, and treatment of patients with MDS and AML. Patients with inherited MDS/AML should be treated differently from sporadic cases with unique considerations particularly in regards to allogeneic SCT; both intensity of transplant regimens and donor selection. Clinicians should be able to recognize the characteristic features of hereditary predispositions to hematologic malignancies, and obtain a careful family and medical history in all patients with MDS and AML to identify patients who may be appropriate for further genetic counseling and testing. It is important to note that genetic testing in hematological malignancies differ from that in solid tumors where peripheral blood is the usual source of DNA. In hematological malignancies, peripheral blood is usually contaminated with cancer cells, thus, genetic testing on blood is somatic and not germline. Skin fibroblasts are the gold standard source of germline DNA for individuals with hematologic malignancies for germline analysis. Standard skin punch biopsies can provide a quick and practical way for obtaining cultured skin fibroblasts.

The recognition of inherited cancer predisposition syndromes is essential for the optimal management and treatment of patients. Management of patients with familial syndromes is ideally multidisciplinary, involving different specialists depending on the organ systems involved, with care to avoid risks of increased toxicity seen in many inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. In affected patients, close monitoring for early identification of malignant transformation is recommended.

Practice Points.

  • Familial forms of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloid leukemia have traditionally been considered rare, especially in adults; however, the increasing awareness and availability of genetic testing has identified multiple susceptibility genes.

  • Bone marrow failure syndromes such as Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, Diamond–Blackfan anemia, and Shwachman–Diamond syndrome, are often characterized by clinically-recognizable phenotypes and have significantly increased risks for myelodysplasia and/or acute myeloid leukemia in the setting of bone marrow failure.

  • An increasing number of genes conferring inherited risks for myelodysplastic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia as the primary malignancy have been identified including RUNX1, ANKRD26, DDX41, ETV6, GATA2, and SRP72.

  • Some cancer predisposition syndromes are associated with a significant increase in the risk of development of myelodysplasia and myeloid leukemia including Li-Fraumeni syndrome, constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD), Werner syndrome, Bloom syndrome, Nijmegen breakage syndromes, neurofibromatosis 1, etc.

  • The management of patients with inherited myeloid malignancies is different from that of sporadic cases and hence the recognition of these syndromes is of paramount importance.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

H.R. and C.D.D. report no relevant conflicts of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Goldberg SL, Chen E, Corral M, Guo A, Mody-Patel N, Pecora AL, et al. Incidence and clinical complications of myelodysplastic syndromes among United States Medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(17):2847–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alter BP, Giri N, Savage SA, Peters JA, Loud JT, Leathwood L, et al. Malignancies and survival patterns in the National Cancer Institute inherited bone marrow failure syndromes cohort study. Br J Haematol. 2010;150(2):179–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Savage SA, Dufour C. Classical inherited bone marrow failure syndromes with high risk for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2017;54(2):105–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alter BP. Fanconi anemia and the development of leukemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2014;27(3–4):214–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dale DC, Cottle TE, Fier CJ, Bolyard AA, Bonilla MA, Boxer LA, et al. Severe chronic neutropenia: treatment and follow-up of patients in the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry. Am J Hematol. 2003;72(2):82–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dokal I Dyskeratosis congenita in all its forms. Br J Haematol. 2000;110(4):768–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Myers KC, Bolyard AA, Otto B, Wong TE, Jones AT, Harris RE, et al. Variable clinical presentation of Shwachman-Diamond syndrome: update from the North American Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome Registry. J Pediatr. 2014;164(4):866–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vlachos A, Rosenberg P, Kang J, Atsidaftos E, Alter B, Lipton J. Cancer Predisposition in Diamond Blackfan Anemia: An Update from the Diamond Blackfan Anemia Registry. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:S61-S. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keel SB, Scott A, Sanchez-Bonilla M, Ho PA, Gulsuner S, Pritchard CC, et al. Genetic features of myelodysplastic syndrome and aplastic anemia in pediatric and young adult patients. Haematologica. 2016;101(11):1343–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wlodarski MW, Hirabayashi S, Pastor V, Stary J, Hasle H, Masetti R, et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of GATA2-related myelodysplastic syndromes in children and adolescents. Blood. 2016;127(11):1387–97; quiz 518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang J, Walsh MF, Wu G, Edmonson MN, Gruber TA, Easton J, et al. Germline Mutations in Predisposition Genes in Pediatric Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(24):2336–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lu C, Xie M, Wendl MC, Wang J, McLellan MD, Leiserson MD, et al. Patterns and functional implications of rare germline variants across 12 cancer types. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buonocore F, Kuhnen P, Suntharalingham JP, Del Valle I, Digweed M, Stachelscheid H, et al. Somatic mutations and progressive monosomy modify SAMD9-related phenotypes in humans. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(5):1700–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen DH, Below JE, Shimamura A, Keel SB, Matsushita M, Wolff J, et al. Ataxia-Pancytopenia Syndrome Is Caused by Missense Mutations in SAMD9L. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(6):1146–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Drazer MW, Feurstein S, West AH, Jones MF, Churpek JE, Godley LA, et al. How I diagnose and manage individuals at risk for inherited myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2016;128(14):1800–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Polprasert C, Schulze I, Sekeres MA, Makishima H, Przychodzen B, Hosono N, et al. Inherited and Somatic Defects in DDX41 in Myeloid Neoplasms. Cancer Cell 2015;27(5):658–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nickels EM, Soodalter J, Churpek JE, Godley LA. Recognizing familial myeloid leukemia in adults. Therapeutic Advances in Hematology. 2013;4(4):254–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pippucci T, Savoia A, Perrotta S, Pujol-Moix N, Noris P, Castegnaro G, et al. Mutations in the 5’ UTR of ANKRD26, the ankirin repeat domain 26 gene, cause an autosomal-dominant form of inherited thrombocytopenia, THC2. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(1):115–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boutroux H, Petit A, Auvrignon A, Lapillonne H, Ballerini P, Favier R, et al. Childhood diagnosis of genetic thrombocytopenia with mutation in the ankyrine repeat domain 26 gene. European journal of pediatrics. 2015;174(10):1399–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Noris P, Perrotta S, Seri M, Pecci A, Gnan C, Loffredo G, et al. Mutations in ANKRD26 are responsible for a frequent form of inherited thrombocytopenia: analysis of 78 patients from 21 families. Blood. 2011;117(24):6673–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Noris P, Favier R, Alessi MC, Geddis AE, Kunishima S, Heller PG, et al. ANKRD26-related thrombocytopenia and myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2013;122(11):1987–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith ML, Cavenagh JD, Lister TA, Fitzgibbon J. Mutation of CEBPA in familial acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(23):2403–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Debeljak M, Kitanovski L, Pajic T, Jazbec J. Concordant acute myeloblastic leukemia in monozygotic twins with germline and shared somatic mutations in the gene for CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein alpha with 13 years difference at onset. Haematologica. 2013;98(7):e73–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tawana K, Wang J, Renneville A, Bodor C, Hills R, Loveday C, et al. Disease evolution and outcomes in familial AML with germline CEBPA mutations. Blood. 2015;126(10):1214–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Spinner MA, Sanchez LA, Hsu AP, Shaw PA, Zerbe CS, Calvo KR, et al. GATA2 deficiency: a protean disorder of hematopoiesis, lymphatics, and immunity. Blood. 2014;123(6):809–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ostergaard P, Simpson MA, Connell FC, Steward CG, Brice G, Woollard WJ, et al. Mutations in GATA2 cause primary lymphedema associated with a predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (Emberger syndrome). Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):929–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Calvo KR, Vinh DC, Maric I, Wang W, Noel P, Stetler-Stevenson M, et al. Myelodysplasia in autosomal dominant and sporadic monocytopenia immunodeficiency syndrome: diagnostic features and clinical implications. Haematologica. 2011;96(8):1221–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mansour S, Connell F, Steward C, Ostergaard P, Brice G, Smithson S, et al. Emberger syndrome-primary lymphedema with myelodysplasia: report of seven new cases. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152a(9):2287–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vinh DC, Patel SY, Uzel G, Anderson VL, Freeman AF, Olivier KN, et al. Autosomal dominant and sporadic monocytopenia with susceptibility to mycobacteria, fungi, papillomaviruses, and myelodysplasia. Blood. 2010;115(8):1519–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Collin M, Dickinson R, Bigley V. Haematopoietic and immune defects associated with GATA2 mutation. Br J Haematol. 2015;169(2):173–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pasquet M, Bellanne-Chantelot C, Tavitian S, Prade N, Beaupain B, Larochelle O, et al. High frequency of GATA2 mutations in patients with mild chronic neutropenia evolving to MonoMac syndrome, myelodysplasia, and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(5):822–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.West RR, Hsu AP, Holland SM, Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Hickstein DD. Acquired ASXL1 mutations are common in patients with inherited GATA2 mutations and correlate with myeloid transformation. Haematologica. 2014;99(2):276–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Beri-Dexheimer M, Latger-Cannard V, Philippe C, Bonnet C, Chambon P, Roth V, et al. Clinical phenotype of germline RUNX1 haploinsufficiency: from point mutations to large genomic deletions. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16(8):1014–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sakurai M, Kunimoto H, Watanabe N, Fukuchi Y, Yuasa S, Yamazaki S, et al. Impaired hematopoietic differentiation of RUNX1-mutated induced pluripotent stem cells derived from FPD/AML patients. Leukemia. 2014;28(12):2344–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jongmans MC, Kuiper RP, Carmichael CL, Wilkins EJ, Dors N, Carmagnac A, et al. Novel RUNX1 mutations in familial platelet disorder with enhanced risk for acute myeloid leukemia: clues for improved identification of the FPD/AML syndrome. Leukemia. 2010;24(1):242–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Preudhomme C, Renneville A, Bourdon V, Philippe N, Roche-Lestienne C, Boissel N, et al. High frequency of RUNX1 biallelic alteration in acute myeloid leukemia secondary to familial platelet disorder. Blood. 2009;113(22):5583–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ganly P, Walker LC, Morris CM. Familial mutations of the transcription factor RUNX1 (AML1, CBFA2) predispose to acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2004;45(1):1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Owen CJ, Toze CL, Koochin A, Forrest DL, Smith CA, Stevens JM, et al. Five new pedigrees with inherited RUNX1 mutations causing familial platelet disorder with propensity to myeloid malignancy. Blood. 2008;112(12):4639–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kirwan M, Walne AJ, Plagnol V, Velangi M, Ho A, Hossain U, et al. Exome sequencing identifies autosomal-dominant SRP72 mutations associated with familial aplasia and myelodysplasia. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(5):888–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Noetzli L, Lo RW, Lee-Sherick AB, Callaghan M, Noris P, Savoia A, et al. Germline mutations in ETV6 are associated with thrombocytopenia, red cell macrocytosis and predisposition to lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2015;47(5):535–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang MY, Churpek JE, Keel SB, Walsh T, Lee MK, Loeb KR, et al. Germline ETV6 mutations in familial thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancy. Nat Genet. 2015;47(2):180–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nijmegen breakage syndrome. The International Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Study Group. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82(5):400–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Malkin D, Li FP, Strong LC, Fraumeni JF Jr., Nelson CE, Kim DH, et al. Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science. 1990;250(4985):1233–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lalloo F, Varley J, Ellis D, Moran A, O’Dair L, Pharoah P, et al. Prediction of pathogenic mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer by family history. Lancet. 2003;361(9363):1101–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gonzalez KD, Noltner KA, Buzin CH, Gu D, Wen-Fong CY, Nguyen VQ, et al. Beyond Li Fraumeni Syndrome: clinical characteristics of families with p53 germline mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(8):1250–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Reinhardt HC, Schumacher B. The p53 network: cellular and systemic DNA damage responses in aging and cancer. Trends Genet. 2012;28(3):128–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vousden KH, Prives C. Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53. Cell. 2009;137(3):413–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lane DP. Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature. 1992;358(6381):15–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nigro JM, Baker SJ, Preisinger AC, Jessup JM, Hostetter R, Cleary K, et al. Mutations in the p53 gene occur in diverse human tumour types. Nature. 1989;342(6250):705–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schneider K, Zelley K, Nichols KE, Garber J. Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, et al. , editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA) 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mai PL, Best AF, Peters JA, DeCastro RM, Khincha PP, Loud JT, et al. Risks of first and subsequent cancers among TP53 mutation carriers in the National Cancer Institute Li-Fraumeni syndrome cohort. Cancer. 2016;122(23):3673–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bougeard G, Renaux-Petel M, Flaman JM, Charbonnier C, Fermey P, Belotti M, et al. Revisiting Li-Fraumeni Syndrome From TP53 Mutation Carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(21):2345–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Stieglitz E, Loh ML. Genetic predispositions to childhood leukemia. Ther Adv Hematol. 2013;4(4):270–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tinat J, Bougeard G, Baert-Desurmont S, Vasseur S, Martin C, Bouvignies E, et al. 2009 version of the Chompret criteria for Li Fraumeni syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(26):e108–9; author reply e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Holmfeldt L, Wei L, Diaz-Flores E, Walsh M, Zhang J, Ding L, et al. The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013;45(3):242–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Talwalkar SS, Yin CC, Naeem RC, Hicks MJ, Strong LC, Abruzzo LV. Myelodysplastic syndromes arising in patients with germline TP53 mutation and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(7):1010–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chompret A, Abel A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Brugieres L, Pages S, Feunteun J, et al. Sensitivity and predictive value of criteria for p53 germline mutation screening. J Med Genet. 2001;38(1):43–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li FP, Fraumeni JF Jr., Mulvihill JJ, Blattner WA, Dreyfus MG, Tucker MA, et al. A cancer family syndrome in twenty-four kindreds. Cancer Res. 1988;48(18):5358–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Villani A, Shore A, Wasserman JD, Stephens D, Kim RH, Druker H, et al. Biochemical and imaging surveillance in germline TP53 mutation carriers with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: 11 year follow-up of a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(9):1295–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen S, Wang W, Lee S, Nafa K, Lee J, Romans K, et al. Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome. JAMA. 2006;296(12):1479–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A. Hereditary colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(10):919–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wimmer K, Kratz CP, Vasen HF, Caron O, Colas C, Entz-Werle N, et al. Diagnostic criteria for constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome: suggestions of the European consortium ‘care for CMMRD’ (C4CMMRD). J Med Genet. 2014;51(6):355–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bakry D, Aronson M, Durno C, Rimawi H, Farah R, Alharbi QK, et al. Genetic and clinical determinants of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome: report from the constitutional mismatch repair deficiency consortium. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(5):987–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Vasen HF, Ghorbanoghli Z, Bourdeaut F, Cabaret O, Caron O, Duval A, et al. Guidelines for surveillance of individuals with constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency proposed by the European Consortium “Care for CMMR-D” (C4CMMR-D). J Med Genet. 2014;51(5):283–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ripperger T, Schlegelberger B. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma in the context of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2016;59(3):133–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bouffet E, Larouche V, Campbell BB, Merico D, de Borja R, Aronson M, et al. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Hypermutant Glioblastoma Multiforme Resulting From Germline Biallelic Mismatch Repair Deficiency. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(19):2206–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shlien A, Campbell BB, de Borja R, Alexandrov LB, Merico D, Wedge D, et al. Combined hereditary and somatic mutations of replication error repair genes result in rapid onset of ultra-hypermutated cancers. Nat Genet. 2015;47(3):257–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Elhasid R, Dvir R, Rosenfeld Keidar H, Ben Shachar S, Bitan M, Solar I, et al. Management of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia in a Child With Biallelic Mismatch Repair Deficiency. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2015;37(8):e490–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Durno CA, Aronson M, Tabori U, Malkin D, Gallinger S, Chan HS. Oncologic surveillance for subjects with biallelic mismatch repair gene mutations: 10 year follow-up of a kindred. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;59(4):652–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Epstein CJ, Martin GM, Schultz AL, Motulsky AG. Werner’s syndrome a review of its symptomatology, natural history, pathologic features, genetics and relationship to the natural aging process. Medicine (Baltimore). 1966;45(3):177–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yu CE, Oshima J, Wijsman EM, Nakura J, Miki T, Piussan C, et al. Mutations in the consensus helicase domains of the Werner syndrome gene. Werner’s Syndrome Collaborative Group. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60(2):330–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Huang S, Lee L, Hanson NB, Lenaerts C, Hoehn H, Poot M, et al. The spectrum of WRN mutations in Werner syndrome patients. Hum Mutat. 2006;27(6):558–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Satoh M, Imai M, Sugimoto M, Goto M, Furuichi Y. Prevalence of Werner’s syndrome heterozygotes in Japan. Lancet. 1999;353(9166):1766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Masala MV, Scapaticci S, Olivieri C, Pirodda C, Montesu MA, Cuccuru MA, et al. Epidemiology and clinical aspects of Werner’s syndrome in North Sardinia: description of a cluster. Eur J Dermatol. 2007;17(3):213–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tang W, Robles AI, Beyer RP, Gray LT, Nguyen GH, Oshima J, et al. The Werner syndrome RECQ helicase targets G4 DNA in human cells to modulate transcription. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(10):2060–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lauper JM, Krause A, Vaughan TL, Monnat RJ, Jr. Spectrum and risk of neoplasia in Werner syndrome: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ding SL, Yu JC, Chen ST, Hsu GC, Shen CY. Genetic variation in the premature aging gene WRN: a case-control study on breast cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(2):263–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sokolenko AP, Preobrazhenskaya EV, Aleksakhina SN, Iyevleva AG, Mitiushkina NV, Zaitseva OA, et al. Candidate gene analysis of BRCA1/2 mutation-negative high-risk Russian breast cancer patients. Cancer Lett. 2015;359(2):259–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Oshima J, Martin GM, Hisama FM. Werner Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, et al. , editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA) 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sanz MM, German J, Cunniff C. Bloom’s Syndrome. In: Adam, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, et al. , editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA) 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bloom D Congenital telangiectatic erythema resembling lupus erythematosus in dwarfs; probably a syndrome entity. AMA Am J Dis Child. 1954;88(6):754–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ellis NA, Groden J, Ye TZ, Straughen J, Lennon DJ, Ciocci S, et al. The Bloom’s syndrome gene product is homologous to RecQ helicases. Cell. 1995;83(4):655–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Shahrabani-Gargir L, Shomrat R, Yaron Y, Orr-Urtreger A, Groden J, Legum C. High frequency of a common Bloom syndrome Ashkenazi mutation among Jews of Polish origin. Genet Test. 1998;2(4):293–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.German J Bloom syndrome: a mendelian prototype of somatic mutational disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 1993;72(6):393–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Poppe B, Van Limbergen H, Van Roy N, Vandecruys E, De Paepe A, Benoit Y, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in Bloom syndrome patients with myeloid malignancies. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2001;128(1):39–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Varon R, Vissinga C, Platzer M, Cerosaletti KM, Chrzanowska KH, Saar K, et al. Nibrin, a novel DNA double-strand break repair protein, is mutated in Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Cell. 1998;93(3):467–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Varon R, Demuth I, Chrzanowska KH. Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens, et al. , editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA) 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Digweed M, Sperling K. Nijmegen breakage syndrome: clinical manifestation of defective response to DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3(8–9):1207–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chrzanowska KH, Gregorek H, Dembowska-Baginska B, Kalina MA, Digweed M. Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Chrzanowska KH, Szarras-Czapnik M, Gajdulewicz M, Kalina MA, Gajtko-Metera M, WalewskaWolf M, et al. High prevalence of primary ovarian insufficiency in girls and young women with Nijmegen breakage syndrome: evidence from a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(7):3133–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Resnick IB, Kondratenko I, Togoev O, Vasserman N, Shagina I, Evgrafov O, et al. Nijmegen breakage syndrome: clinical characteristics and mutation analysis in eight unrelated Russian families. J Pediatr. 2002;140(3):355–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Dembowska-Baginska B, Perek D, Brozyna A, Wakulinska A, Olczak-Kowalczyk D, Gladkowska-Dura M, et al. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in children with Nijmegen Breakage syndrome (NBS). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;52(2):186–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Albert MH, Gennery AR, Greil J, Cale CM, Kalwak K, Kondratenko I, et al. Successful SCT for Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45(4):622–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hasle H, Clemmensen IH, Mikkelsen M. Risks of leukaemia and solid tumours in individuals with Down’s syndrome. Lancet. 2000;355(9199):165–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Patja K, Pukkala E, Sund R, Iivanainen M, Kaski M. Cancer incidence of persons with Down syndrome in Finland: a population-based study. International journal of cancer. 2006;118(7):1769–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sullivan SG, Hussain R, Glasson EJ, Bittles AH. The profile and incidence of cancer in Down syndrome. Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR. 2007;51(Pt 3):228–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mitelman F, Heim S, Mandahl N. Trisomy 21 in neoplastic cells. American journal of medical genetics Supplement. 1990;7:262–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Creutzig U, Ritter J, Vormoor J, Ludwig WD, Niemeyer C, Reinisch I, et al. Myelodysplasia and acute myelogenous leukemia in Down’s syndrome. A report of 40 children of the AML-BFM Study Group. Leukemia. 1996;10(11):1677–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Okada H, Liu PI, Hoshino T, Yamamoto T, Yamaoka H, Murakami M. Down’s syndrome associated with a myeloproliferative disorder. American journal of diseases of children (1960). 1972;124(1):107–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Pine SR, Guo Q, Yin C, Jayabose S, Druschel CM, Sandoval C. Incidence and clinical implications of GATA1 mutations in newborns with Down syndrome. Blood. 2007;110(6):2128–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lange B The management of neoplastic disorders of haematopoiesis in children with Down’s syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2000;110(3):512–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ravindranath Y, Abella E, Krischer JP, Wiley J, Inoue S, Harris M, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in Down’s syndrome is highly responsive to chemotherapy: experience on Pediatric Oncology Group AML Study 8498. Blood. 1992;80(9):2210–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lange BJ, Kobrinsky N, Barnard DR, Arthur DC, Buckley JD, Howells WB, et al. Distinctive demography, biology, and outcome of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in children with Down syndrome: Children’s Cancer Group Studies 2861 and 2891. Blood. 1998;91(2):608–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kudo K, Kojima S, Tabuchi K, Yabe H, Tawa A, Imaizumi M, et al. Prospective study of a pirarubicin, intermediate-dose cytarabine, and etoposide regimen in children with Down syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: the Japanese Childhood AML Cooperative Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(34):5442–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Creutzig U, Reinhardt D, Diekamp S, Dworzak M, Stary J, Zimmermann M. AML patients with Down syndrome have a high cure rate with AML-BFM therapy with reduced dose intensity. Leukemia. 2005;19(8):1355–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Rao A, Hills RK, Stiller C, Gibson BE, de Graaf SS, Hann IM, et al. Treatment for myeloid leukaemia of Down syndrome: population-based experience in the UK and results from the Medical Research Council AML 10 and AML 12 trials. Br J Haematol. 2006;132(5):576–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Gamis AS, Woods WG, Alonzo TA, Buxton A, Lange B, Barnard DR, et al. Increased age at diagnosis has a significantly negative effect on outcome in children with Down syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group Study 2891. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(18):3415–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Al-Ahmari A, Shah N, Sung L, Zipursky A, Hitzler J. Long-term results of an ultra low-dose cytarabine-based regimen for the treatment of acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia in children with Down syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2006;133(6):646–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Al-Kasim F, Doyle JJ, Massey GV, Weinstein HJ, Zipursky A. Incidence and treatment of potentially lethal diseases in transient leukemia of Down syndrome: Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;24(1):9–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Tchernia G, Lejeune F, Boccara JF, Denavit MF, Dommergues JP, Bernaudin F. Erythroblastic and/or megakaryoblastic leukemia in Down syndrome: treatment with low-dose arabinosyl cytosine. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1996;18(1):59–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Taga T, Shimomura Y, Horikoshi Y, Ogawa A, Itoh M, Okada M, et al. Continuous and high-dose cytarabine combined chemotherapy in children with down syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: Report from the Japanese children’s cancer and leukemia study group (JCCLSG) AML 9805 down study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57(1):36–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kratz CP, Rapisuwon S, Reed H, Hasle H, Rosenberg PS. Cancer in Noonan, Costello, cardiofaciocutaneous and LEOPARD syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(2):83–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Jongmans M, Sistermans EA, Rikken A, Nillesen WM, Tamminga R, Patton M, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Noonan syndrome: New data and review of the literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2005;134A(2):165–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Shaw AC, Kalidas K, Crosby AH, Jeffery S, Patton MA. The natural history of Noonan syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(2):128–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Mendez HM, Opitz JM. Noonan syndrome: a review. American journal of medical genetics. 1985;21(3):493–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Tartaglia M, Gelb BD. Noonan syndrome and related disorders: genetics and pathogenesis. Annual review of genomics and human genetics. 2005;6:45–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Schubbert S, Shannon K, Bollag G. Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nature reviews Cancer. 2007;7(4):295–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hasle H Malignant diseases in Noonan syndrome and related disorders. Horm Res. 2009;72 Suppl 2:8–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Bader-Meunier B, Tchernia G, Mielot F, Fontaine JL, Thomas C, Lyonnet S, et al. Occurrence of myeloproliferative disorder in patients with Noonan syndrome. J Pediatr. 1997;130(6):885–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Niemeyer CM, Arico M, Basso G, Biondi A, Cantu Rajnoldi A, Creutzig U, et al. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in childhood: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases. European Working Group on Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Childhood (EWOG-MDS). Blood. 1997;89(10):3534–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Chan RJ, Cooper T, Kratz CP, Weiss B, Loh ML. Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: a report from the 2nd International JMML Symposium. Leuk Res. 2009;33(3):355–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Emanuel PD, Bates LJ, Castleberry RP, Gualtieri RJ, Zuckerman KS. Selective hypersensitivity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor by juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 1991;77(5):925–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Cheong JL, Moorkamp MH. Respiratory failure, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, and neonatal Noonan syndrome. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007;29(4):262–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Choong K, Freedman MH, Chitayat D, Kelly EN, Taylor G, Zipursky A. Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Noonan syndrome. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1999;21(6):523–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Fukuda M, Horibe K, Miyajima Y, Matsumoto K, Nagashima M. Spontaneous remission of juvenile chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in an infant with Noonan syndrome. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1997;19(2):177–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kratz CP, Niemeyer CM, Castleberry RP, Cetin M, Bergstrasser E, Emanuel PD, et al. The mutational spectrum of PTPN11 in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Noonan syndrome/myeloproliferative disease. Blood. 2005;106(6):2183–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Yoshida R, Miyata M, Nagai T, Yamazaki T, Ogata T. A 3-bp deletion mutation of PTPN11 in an infant with severe Noonan syndrome including hydrops fetalis and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;128A(1):63–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Tartaglia M, Niemeyer CM, Fragale A, Song X, Buechner J, Jung A, et al. Somatic mutations in PTPN11 in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 2003;34(2):148–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Perez B, Kosmider O, Cassinat B, Renneville A, Lachenaud J, Kaltenbach S, et al. Genetic typing of CBL, ASXL1, RUNX1, TET2 and JAK2 in juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia reveals a genetic profile distinct from chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2010;151(5):460–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Cawthon RM, Weiss R, Xu GF, Viskochil D, Culver M, Stevens J, et al. A major segment of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene: cDNA sequence, genomic structure, and point mutations. Cell. 1990;62(1):193–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Cawthon RM, O’Connell P, Buchberg AM, Viskochil D, Weiss RB, Culver M, et al. Identification and characterization of transcripts from the neurofibromatosis 1 region: the sequence and genomic structure of EVI2 and mapping of other transcripts. Genomics. 1990;7(4):555–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Viskochil D, Buchberg AM, Xu G, Cawthon RM, Stevens J, Wolff RK, et al. Deletions and a translocation interrupt a cloned gene at the neurofibromatosis type 1 locus. Cell. 1990;62(1):187–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Wallace MR, Marchuk DA, Andersen LB, Letcher R, Odeh HM, Saulino AM, et al. Type 1 neurofibromatosis gene: identification of a large transcript disrupted in three NF1 patients. Science. 1990;249(4965):181–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Ishioka C, Ballester R, Engelstein M, Vidal M, Kassel J, Bernards A, et al. A functional assay for heterozygous mutations in the GTPase activating protein related domain of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene. Oncogene. 1995;10(5):841–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Martin GA, Viskoohil D, Bollag G, McCabe PC, Crosier WJ, Haubruck H, et al. The GAP-related domain of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene product interacts with ras p21. Cell. 1990;63(4):843–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Xu G, Lin B, Tanaka K, Dunn D, Wood D, Gesteland R, et al. The catalytic domain of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene product stimulates ras GTPase and complements ira mutants of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990;63(4):835–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Xu G, O’Connell P, Viskochil D, Cawthon R, Robertson M, Culver M, et al. The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene encodes a protein related to GAP. Cell. 1990;62(3):599–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Stiller C, Chessells J, Fitchett M. Neurofibromatosis and childhood leukaemia/lymphoma: a population-based UKCCSG study. British journal of cancer. 1994;70(5):969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Zvulunov A, Barak Y, Metzker A. Juvenile xanthogranuloma, neurofibromatosis, and juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia: world statistical analysis. Archives of dermatology. 1995;131(8):904–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Shannon KM, O’Connell P, Martin GA, Paderanga D, Olson K, Dinndorf P, et al. Loss of the normal NF1 allele from the bone marrow of children with type 1 neurofibromatosis and malignant myeloid disorders. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;330(9):597–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Bollag G, Clapp DW, Shih S, Adler F, Zhang YY, Thompson P, et al. Loss of NF1 results in activation of the Ras signaling pathway and leads to aberrant growth in haematopoietic cells. Nature genetics. 1996;12(2):144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Birnbaum RA, O’Marcaigh A, Wardak Z, Zhang Y-Y, Dranoff G, Jacks T, et al. Nf1 and Gmcsf interact in myeloid leukemogenesis. Molecular cell. 2000;5(1):189–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Soulier J Fanconi anemia. ASH Education Program Book. 2011;2011(1):492–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kee Y, D’andrea AD. Molecular pathogenesis and clinical management of Fanconi anemia. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2012;122(11):3799–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Butturini A, Gale RP, Verlander PC, Adler-Brecher B, Gillio A, Auerbach A. Hematologic abnormalities in Fanconi anemia: an International Fanconi Anemia Registry study [see comments]. Blood. 1994;84(5):1650–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Kutler DI, Singh B, Satagopan J, Batish SD, Berwick M, Giampietro PF, et al. A 20-year perspective on the International Fanconi Anemia Registry (IFAR). Blood. 2003;101(4):1249–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Wang W Emergence of a DNA-damage response network consisting of Fanconi anaemia and BRCA proteins. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2007;8(10):735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Howlett NG, Taniguchi T, Olson S, Cox B, Waisfisz Q, de Die-Smulders C, et al. Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi anemia. Science. 2002;297(5581):606–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Quentin S, Cuccuini W, Ceccaldi R, Nibourel O, Pondarre C, Pagès M-P, et al. Myelodysplasia and leukemia of Fanconi anemia are associated with a specific pattern of genomic abnormalities that includes cryptic RUNX1/AML1 lesions. Blood. 2011;117(15):e161–e70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Gluckman E, Auerbach A, Horowitz M, Sobocinski K, Ash R, Bortin M, et al. Bone marrow transplantation for Fanconi anemia. Blood. 1995;86(7):2856–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Walne AJ, Dokal I. Advances in the understanding of dyskeratosis congenita. Br J Haematol. 2009;145(2):164–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Heiss NS, Knight SW, Vulliamy TJ, Klauck SM, Wiemann S, Mason PJ, et al. X-linked dyskeratosis congenita is caused by mutations in a highly conserved gene with putative nucleolar functions. Nat Genet. 1998;19(1):32–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Mitchell JR, Wood E, Collins K. A telomerase component is defective in the human disease dyskeratosis congenita. Nature. 1999;402(6761):551–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Vulliamy T, Marrone A, Goldman F, Dearlove A, Bessler M, Mason PJ, et al. The RNA component of telomerase is mutated in autosomal dominant dyskeratosis congenita. Nature. 2001;413(6854):432–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Yamaguchi H, Calado RT, Ly H, Kajigaya S, Baerlocher GM, Chanock SJ, et al. Mutations in TERT, the gene for telomerase reverse transcriptase, in aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(14):1413–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Alter BP, Baerlocher GM, Savage SA, Chanock SJ, Weksler BB, Willner JP, et al. Very short telomere length by flow fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies patients with dyskeratosis congenita. Blood. 2007;110(5):1439–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.de la Fuente J, Dokal I. Dyskeratosis congenita: advances in the understanding of the telomerase defect and the role of stem cell transplantation. Pediatric transplantation. 2007;11(6):584–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Tesi B, Davidsson J, Voss M, Rahikkala E, Holmes TD, Chiang SC, et al. Gain-of-function SAMD9L mutations cause a syndrome of cytopenia, immunodeficiency, MDS, and neurological symptoms. Blood. 2017;129(16):2266–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Daghistani D, Curless R, Toledano SR, Ayyar DR. Ataxia-pancytopenia and monosomy 7 syndrome. The Journal of pediatrics. 1989;115(1):108–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Li FP, Hecht F, Kaiser-McCaw B, Baranko PV, Potter NU. Ataxia-pancytopenia: syndrome of cerebellar ataxia, hypoplastic anemia, monosomy 7, and acute myelogenous leukemia. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics. 1981;4(3):189–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Li FP, Potter NU, Buchanan GR, Vawter G, Whang-Peng J, Rosen RB. A family with acute leukemia, hypoplastic anemia and cerebellar ataxia: association with bone marrow C-monosomy. The American journal of medicine. 1978;65(6):933–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Narumi S, Amano N, Ishii T, Katsumata N, Muroya K, Adachi M, et al. SAMD9 mutations cause a novel multisystem disorder, MIRAGE syndrome, and are associated with loss of chromosome 7. Nature genetics. 2016;48(7):792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Dror Y, Freedman MH. Shwachman-diamond syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2002;118(3):701–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Diagnosis Alter B., Genetics, and Management of Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes2007.
  • 165.Ip WF, Dupuis A, Ellis L, Beharry S, Morrison J, Stormon MO, et al. Serum pancreatic enzymes define the pancreatic phenotype in patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. The Journal of pediatrics. 2002;141(2):259–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Rothbaum R, Perrault J, Vlachos A, Cipolli M, Alter BP, Burroughs S, et al. Shwachman-Diamond syndrome: report from an international conference. The Journal of pediatrics. 2002;141(2):266–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Boocock GR, Morrison JA, Popovic M, Richards N, Ellis L, Durie PR, et al. Mutations in SBDS are associated with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Nat Genet. 2003;33(1):97–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Menne TF, Goyenechea B, Sanchez-Puig N, Wong CC, Tonkin LM, Ancliff PJ, et al. The Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome protein mediates translational activation of ribosomes in yeast. Nat Genet. 2007;39(4):486–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Welte K, Zeidler C, Dale DC. Severe congenital neutropenia. Semin Hematol. 2006;43(3):189–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Horwitz M, Benson KF, Person RE, Aprikyan AG, Dale DC. Mutations in ELA2, encoding neutrophil elastase, define a 21-day biological clock in cyclic haematopoiesis. Nat Genet. 1999;23(4):433–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Horwitz MS, Duan Z, Korkmaz B, Lee HH, Mealiffe ME, Salipante SJ. Neutrophil elastase in cyclic and severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 2007;109(5):1817–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Carlsson G, Fasth A, Berglof E, Lagerstedt-Robinson K, Nordenskjold M, Palmblad J, et al. Incidence of severe congenital neutropenia in Sweden and risk of evolution to myelodysplastic syndrome/leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2012;158(3):363–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Bonilla MA, Gillio AP, Ruggeiro M, Kernan NA, Brochstein JA, Abboud M, et al. Effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on neutropenia in patients with congenital agranulocytosis. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(24):1574–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Welte K, Zeidler C, Reiter A, Muller W, Odenwald E, Souza L, et al. Differential effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with severe congenital neutropenia. Blood. 1990;75(5):1056–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Fioredda F, Iacobelli S, van Biezen A, Gaspar B, Ancliff P, Donadieu J, et al. Stem cell transplantation in severe congenital neutropenia: an analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood. 2015;126(16):1885–92; quiz 970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Vlachos A, Ball S, Dahl N, Alter BP, Sheth S, Ramenghi U, et al. Diagnosing and treating Diamond Blackfan anaemia: results of an international clinical consensus conference. British journal of haematology. 2008;142(6):859–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Vlachos A, Rosenberg PS, Atsidaftos E, Alter BP, Lipton JM. Incidence of neoplasia in Diamond Blackfan anemia: a report from the Diamond Blackfan Anemia Registry. Blood. 2012;119(16):3815–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.De Latour RP, Peters C, Gibson B, Strahm B, Lankester A, De Heredia C, et al. Recommendations on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Bone marrow transplantation. 2015;50(9):1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Vlachos A, Rosenberg PS, Kang J, Atsidaftos E, Alter BP, Lipton JM. Myelodysplastic syndrome and gastrointestinal carcinomas characterize the cancer risk in Diamond Blackfan anemia: a report from the Diamond Blackfan Anemia Registry. Am Soc Hematology; 2016. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES