Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2023 May 13;435(13):168145. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168145

APEX3 – an optimized tool for rapid and unbiased proximity labeling

Jordan T Becker 1,2,3,*, Ashley A Auerbach 4, Reuben S Harris 1,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC10247536  NIHMSID: NIHMS1900932  PMID: 37182813

Abstract

Macromolecular interactions regulate all aspects of biology. The identification of interacting partners and complexes is important for understanding cellular processes, host-pathogen conflicts, and organismal development. Multiple methods exist to label and enrich interacting proteins in living cells. Notably, the soybean ascorbate peroxidase, APEX2, rapidly biotinylates adjacent biomolecules in the presence of biotin-phenol and hydrogen peroxide. However, during initial experiments with this system, we found that APEX2 exhibits a cytoplasmic-biased localization and is sensitive to the nuclear export inhibitor leptomycin B (LMB). This led us to identify a putative nuclear export signal (NES) at the carboxy-terminus of APEX2 (NESAPEX2), structurally adjacent to the conserved heme binding site. This putative NES is functional as evidenced by cytoplasmic localization and LMB sensitivity of a mCherry-NESAPEX2 chimeric construct. Single amino acid substitutions of multiple hydrophobic residues within NESAPEX2 eliminate cytoplasm-biased localization of both mCherry-NESAPEX2 as well as full-length APEX2. However, all but one of these NES substitutions also compromises peroxide-dependent labeling. This unique separation-of-function mutant, APEX2-L242A, is termed APEX3. Localization and functionality of APEX3 are confirmed by fusion to the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling transcriptional factor, RELA. APEX3 is therefore an optimized tool for unbiased proximity labeling of cellular proteins and interacting factors.

Keywords: APEX2/3, nuclear export signal (NES), nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, proximity labeling technology, subcellular localization

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1900932-f0005.jpg

INTRODUCTION

The subcellular localization of biological macromolecules is a key determinant of function [16]. Notably, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and their preferred RNA substrates must occupy or transit to the same subcellular location in order to interact [710]. In homeostatic circumstances, colocalization is important for regulating key biological processes including RNA trafficking in neurons, mRNA translation, splicing, RNA export, and non-sense mediated decay [1115]. In the context of host-pathogen conflicts, compartmentalized interactions are required for multiple antiviral mechanisms such as APOBEC3 packaging into retroviral virions [16,17] and ZAP binding to CpG-rich RNAs [1820]. Finally, these interactions determine successful or abortive virus replication (e.g., viral structural proteins binding genomic RNA or RNA polymerase with template viral RNA [21,22]). Furthermore, purposeful disruption of biological localization is a pharmaceutical target (e.g., the XPO1 inhibitor Selinexor disrupts nuclear export) [2327]. Understanding the diverse interactions of a particular protein of interest (POI) is important and, accordingly, multiple methods have been developed to interrogate these interactions.

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and RNA-protein interactions (RPIs) are commonly investigated by immunoprecipitation (IP) of a known target using a specific antibody coupled to downstream mass spectrometry or RNA sequencing, respectively [28]. These methods are effective but may sometimes miss relevant interactions. For example, a particular protein may only interact with some partners transiently, weakly, or indirectly (i.e., through interaction with other molecules). Recent advances for in cellulo proximity labeling allow for tunable labeling and enrichment of interacting molecular complexes as well as capturing of transient interactions. Notably, the engineered soybean ascorbate peroxidase (APEX2) catalyzes the conjugation of biotin-phenol to adjacent proteins and RNA in the presence of hydrogen peroxide [2931]. This reaction occurs rapidly (seconds to minutes) and allows for flexible experimental modification. Indeed, APEX2 has been used to identify the spatiotemporal PPI network of GPCR signaling [32], the spatiotemporal PPI and RPI networks of RNA granule formation [33], and a transcriptome-wide atlas of subcellular RNA localization [34]. Notably, these studies used proteins with strong subcellular localization determinants fused to APEX2.

We initially intended to use APEX2 to identify the PPI and RPI networks and shuttling mechanisms of a family of related cellular proteins with disparate nuclear and cytoplasmic localizations. However, during experiments designed to validate the localization of APEX2 fusion proteins we found that APEX2 itself exhibits a cytoplasm-biased localization rather than a diffuse, whole-cell localization that is characteristic of most fluorescent and non-compartmentalized proteins. This observation led to the identification of a putative nuclear export signal (NES) in APEX2 that is conserved in the parental soybean ascorbate peroxidase 1 (APX1) protein as well other plant homologs. The functionality of this putative NES is demonstrated by cytoplasmic localization of a heterologous fusion to mCherry and responsiveness to the XPO1 inhibitor leptomycin B (LMB). In addition, mutations to hydrophobic residues in this NES motif compromise the cytoplasm-biased localization of APEX2, however most of these mutants also lack peroxidase activity. We identified one APEX2 mutant (L242A) that exhibits whole-cell localization and retains peroxidase activity. This separation-of-function mutant, termed APEX3, is further validated by fusion to a well-characterized nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein, the RELA component of NF-κB. Overall, we describe an optimized proximity labeling technology, APEX3, that expands the utility of this technology and may help answer a broader number of important questions.

RESULTS

APEX2 exhibits a cytoplasm-biased localization

We were initially interested in using APEX2 to identify interacting factors for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins. In the early stages of these experiments, we generated control constructs for labeling different subcellular compartments (i.e., nucleus, cytoplasm, and whole cell; construct schematics in Figure 1A): APEX2 alone, APEX2 fused to mNeonGreen (mNG) at either its amino- or carboxy-terminus (mNG-APEX2 or APEX2-mNG), a strong NLS [35] fused to mNG-APEX2 (NLS-mNG-APEX2), and a strong NES [3638] fused to mNG-APEX2 (NES-mNG-APEX2). A V5 epitope tag was also added to the carboxy-terminus of APEX2 in all these constructs for detection. HeLa cell lines were generated by transduction to stably express each of these constructs for imaging by fluorescence microscopy. To our surprise, we noticed that APEX2 alone as well as mNG-APEX2 and APEX2-mNG exhibit greater cytoplasmic than nuclear fluorescence intensity (Figure 1B). This localization bias was evident in fixed cells using direct mNG fluorescent signal (green) as well as by indirect V5 epitope staining and immunofluorescent microscopy (rose).

Figure 1. APEX2 is cytoplasmic and leptomycin B sensitive.

Figure 1.

(A) Schematic of APEX2-dependent biotin labeling of a protein-of-interest (POI). Illustrations of constructs used in Figure 1 and Figure S1 studies.

(B) Representative fixed images of the indicated APEX2 constructs expressed stably in HeLa cells (green, mNeonGreen fluorescence; rose, anti-V5 immunostaining; scale = 10 μm). Cell and nuclear boundaries outlined with white dashed lines.

(C) Representative live-cell images of the indicated APEX2 constructs expressed stably in HeLa cells following mock (top) or 2 hrs LMB treatment (bottom) (green, mNeonGreen fluorescence; scale = 10 μm). Cell and nuclear boundaries outlined with white dashed lines.

(D) Quantification of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear mNeonGreen fluorescence ratio in experiments from panel C (N=50 cells per condition; ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05; ****, p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA; scale = 10 μm).

As expected, the NES-mNG-APEX2 control construct with a heterologous NES exhibits increased nuclear localization in HeLa cells following leptomycin B (LMB) treatment to inhibit XPO1-dependent nuclear export [39]. To our surprise, the mNG-APEX2 and APEX2-mNG constructs (without a heterologous NES) also exhibit increased nuclear localization following LMB treatment (Figure 1C, quantified in 1D). As additional controls, mNG alone and NLS-mNG-APEX2 are unaffected by LMB. To demonstrate that this apparent LMB-sensitive (XPO1-dependent) nuclear export activity is intrinsic to APEX2 and not to other features of the mNG-APEX2-V5 fusion constructs, we created a mNG-APEX2 “Stop” construct lacking the V5 epitope and found that it still exhibits cytoplasmic localization and sensitivity to LMB treatment (Figure 1C, quantified in 1D). These constructs also display similar subcellular localization properties in 293T cells (Figure S1). Thus, these results led us to hypothesize that APEX2 has a signal or motif responsible for the observed cytoplasm-biased localization.

APEX2 encodes an amino acid motif that acts as a heterologous NES

Many XPO1-dependent nucleocytoplasmic cargo proteins have an amino acid motif with 3–4 hydrophobic residues [4042], which is often flanked by acidic residues [43] (e.g., DxLxxxLxxLxLxD; alignment in Figure 2A). Submission of the APEX2 amino acid sequence (including mNG, peptide linkers, and V5 epitope) to multiple NES prediction servers [4446] did not identify such a motif. However, manual inspection of the primary APEX2 amino acid sequence revealed an NES-like region at the carboxy-terminus of the protein that is shared with the parental soybean (Glycine hispida) ascorbate peroxidase, ghAPX1 (Figure 2A). Alignment of hundreds of available plant APX1 homologs indicated that this putative NES is highly conserved with the central leucine residues demonstrating 100% conservation (Figure S2). This putative NES is also found in split APEX2 [47] as well as the original APEX [48] derived from Pisum sativum APX.

Figure 2. Putative APEX2 NES functions autonomously upon fusion to mCherry.

Figure 2.

(A) Amino acid alignment of established NES peptides, NESAPEX2, and motif found in Glycine hispida apx1.

(B) Schematic of constructs used in Figure 2.

(C) Representative live-cell images of the indicated mCherry constructs expressed transiently in HeLa cells following mock (top) or 2 hrs LMB treatment (bottom) (pink, mCherry fluorescence; scale = 10 μm). Cell and nuclear boundaries outlined with white dashed lines.

(D) Quantification of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear mCherry fluorescence ratio in experiments from panel C (N=50 cells per condition; ns, not significant; ****, p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA; scale = 10 μm).

(E) Representative fixed images of HeLa cells transfected with indicated mCherry or mCherry-NES constructs. The single amino acid substitution mutants (sequence in panel A) are derivatives of mCherry-NESAPEX2 (scale = 10 μm). Cell and nuclear boundaries outlined with white dashed lines.

To test whether this candidate NES is responsible for APEX2 cytoplasmic localization, this motif (NESAPEX2) was fused to the carboxy-terminus of mCherry and examined in HeLa cells by fluorescent microscopy. In comparison to mCherry alone, which has a cell-wide distribution, mCherry-NESAPEX2 exhibits a distinctly cytoplasmic localization (Figure 2BC; quantification in Figure 2D). Moreover, LMB treatment of cells causes an accumulation of this construct in the nuclear compartment and yields an overall cell wide appearance. As a positive control, an analogous mCherry fusion construct with the well-characterized NES of HIV-1 Rev behaves similarly (Figure 2BC; quantified in 2D). In contrast, an mCherry construct fused with the NLS of SV40 shows predominantly nuclear localization and is unaffected by LMB (Figure 2BC; quantified in 2D).

We next generated a panel of single amino acid mCherry-NESAPEX2 mutant constructs to determine the residues responsible for nuclear export. NES-containing cargos are exported from the nucleus by XPO1, and this interaction is typically mediated by hydrophobic residues within the NES and can be further influenced by flanking acidic residues [40,43]. Therefore, these conserved residues were changed to alanine, glycine, or serine and studied by fluorescence microscopy in HeLa cells. Mutation of the acidic residues of the NES motif resulted in proteins that maintain export function as evidenced by predominantly cytoplasmic localization (E1A or D13A in Figure 2E). In contrast, changes to hydrophobic residues L6, L9, and F11 compromised export activity, evidenced by whole-cell mCherry localization (L6A/G/S, L9A/G/S, and F11A/G/S in Figure 2E). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the putative NES of APEX2 is both portable and functional and therefore a robust export motif.

Most APEX2 NES mutants also lack peroxidase activity

Upon inspection of the structure of soybean ascorbate peroxidase (PDB: 1OAG) [49], we noticed that the putative NES is part of an alpha-helix typical of many NES cargos (Figure 3A). This putative NES may have eluded prediction algorithms (e.g., LocNES and NESsential) because it may have been deemed structurally inaccessible and unlikely to achieve the disorder/flexibility required to engage export machinery [44,46]. Indeed, the critical hydrophobic residues required for export are positioned toward the globular center of the protein and therefore are likely to contribute to structural stability and function of the overall enzyme as a peroxidase (Figure 3A). To address this possibility and ask whether the putative APEX2 NES is active in the context of its native protein structure, single amino acid substitution mutations were introduced into the NES motif of the full-length mNG-APEX2-V5 construct (Figure 3B). Most of these mutations were selected to reduce hydrophobic interactions with XPO1 [40] and to overlap with the set described above. These constructs were expressed stably in HeLa cells and compared using fluorescence microscopy.

Figure 3. Putative APEX2 NES residues are mostly required for peroxidase activity.

Figure 3.

(A) Ribbon schematic of the Glycine hispida APX1 crystal structure (PDB: 1OAG) with NES highlighted in magenta and the heme in red. The NES in APEX2 is identical (Figure 2A).

(B) Schematic of the mNG-APEX2-V5 construct and the approximate position of NESAPEX2 residues.

(C) Representative live-cell images of the indicated mNG-APEX2-V5 constructs expressed stably in HeLa cells (green, mNG fluorescence; scale = 10 μm). Cell and nuclear boundaries outlined with white dashed lines.

(D) Quantification of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear mNeonGreen fluorescence ratio in experiments from panel C (N=50 cells per condition; ns, not significant; *, p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA compared to APEX2; scale = 10 μm). Gray dashed lines highlight values for APEX2 (top) and L242A (bottom).

(E) Representative fixed images of mNG-APEX2-V5 and the indicated L242 mutants expressed stably in HeLa cells showing mNeonGreen fluorescence (green), anti-V5 staining (rose), and streptavidin staining to detect peroxide-dependent biotinylation (blue) (scale = 10 μm). Cell and nuclear boundaries outlined with white dashed lines.

As expected, most substitutions that eliminate NES activity in the heterologous mCherry-NESAPEX2 construct described above also cause analogous reductions in the NES activity of full-length APEX2 (Figure 3C, quantified in 3D). Specifically, L242A/G/S/N or L245A/G/S single amino acid mutants show cell-wide localization indicative of compromised NES-like function. More conservative changes at position 242 (L242V and L242I) have no effect on NES function and, as above, the acidic residues at positions 237 and 249 are dispensable for function (E237A and D249A). An exception appears to be F247S which maintains NES function in the full-length protein despite losing it above in the heterologous mCherry-NESAPEX2 context. Nevertheless, taken together, these results further confirm the functionality of the putative APEX2 NES.

However, when the same cell lines were subjected to hydrogen peroxide-dependent labeling with biotin-phenol, we found that only the L242A mutant of mNG-APEX2-V5 retains labeling activity as detected by streptavidin immunofluorescence (Figure 3E and Figure S3, quantified in S3C). All other mutants showed one of three different phenotypes. The first group retained wild type-like peroxide-dependent labeling activity, as well as NES-like function as evidenced by cytoplasmic localization (e.g., E237A, L242I/V, D249A). The second group lost both peroxide-dependent labeling activity as well as NES function (e.g., L242G/N/S and L245A/G/S). The third group lost peroxide-dependent labeling activity but retained NES-like function (e.g., F247S as well as F231A, F232A, and Y235A that are located amino-terminal relative to the putative NES motif). We speculate that this null phenotype might be due to weakened heme binding and/or a compromised core structure (despite maintaining near wildtype expression levels; Figure 3E and Figure S3). Ultimately, only one single amino acid substitution mutant, L242A, exhibited whole cell localization while retaining peroxidase-dependent labeling activity and, thus, this protein is named APEX3.

APEX3 localizes faithfully upon fusion to nucleocytoplasmic shuttling factor RELA

Finally, the functionality of APEX3 was tested by fusing it to RELA, which is a well-characterized nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein (reviewed by [50,51]). RELA is a key component of the NF-κB transcription factor complex that exhibits cytoplasmic localization at steady state when bound by its inhibitor IκBα [5254]. However, upon receiving a relevant stimulus (e.g., LPS, IL-1, or TNF), IκBα releases from RELA which unveils a NLS that allows translocation to the nucleus, DNA binding, and interaction with transcription elongation factors, CCNT1 and CDK9 (schematic in Figure 4A). Therefore, human RELA was fused to APEX2 or APEX3 with a V5 epitope to observe localization and labeling at steady state and following stimulation with TNF for multiple time points in addition to RELA-mNG as a control (Figure 4B; with quantification in Figure 4C). As expected, RELA-mNG, RELA-APEX, and RELA-APEX3 exhibit cytoplasmic localization at steady state. Moreover, all 3 constructs fully relocalize to the nucleus upon stimulation with TNF after 60 minutes (min). However, by performing a time-course of TNF treatment, we observed that RELA-mNG and RELA-APEX3 exhibit faster nuclear translocation relative to RELA-APEX2 (Figure 4B; quantified in Figure 4C; p < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA). Together these results support the use of APEX3 as an optimized tool for rapid in cellulo proximity labeling, particularly for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins or proteins with uncharacterized localization and regulatory mechanisms.

Figure 4. APEX3 localizes and functions appropriately as fusion to RELA.

Figure 4.

(A) Schematic of RELA relocalization following TNF stimulation.

(B) Representative images of fixed HeLa cells stably expressing RELA-mNG, RELA-APEX2-V5, or RELA-APEX3-V5 following vehicle control or 30 ng/mL TNF treatment for the indicated times (green, mNG fluorescence; rose, anti-V5 immunostaining; scale = 10 μm). Cell and nuclear boundaries outlined with white dashed lines.

(C) Quantification of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear fluorescence ratio of cells in panel B (N=50 cells per condition; ns, not significant; *, p < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA).

DISCUSSION

Proximity labeling is now a widely used experimental technique for identifying molecular interactions across multiple time scales, subcellular locales, and organismal systems [28]. Selecting the appropriate enzymatic labeling tool can dramatically affect the nature and specificity of interactions identified. In trial experiments with the engineered ascorbate peroxidase, APEX2, we observed a cytoplasmic-biased localization that was sensitive to the XPO1 inhibitor, LMB (Figure 1). We identified an amino acid motif at the carboxy-terminus of APEX2 that can act heterologously as an NES when fused to mCherry (Figure 2). Mutations at hydrophobic residues of the NES-like motif in the mCherry fusion as well as in the context of full-length APEX2 eliminated NES-like activity, however only L242A retained the peroxide-dependent labeling activity (Figure 3). We called the L242A mutant, APEX3 – a localization-optimized ascorbate peroxidase. Finally, we confirmed that APEX3 faithfully localizes as a fusion to RELA during NF-κB signaling following TNF stimulation (Figure 4). APEX3 is therefore anticipated to enable a wider range of proximity labeling applications.

Previous work used APEX2 largely in the context of fusions to very strong subcellular-targeting amino acid motifs or to proteins with strong subcellular localizations. Notably, APEX2 fused to potent subcellular localization signals was used to determine the subcellular distribution of cellular RNA molecules [34]. Others used APEX2 fused to eIF4A1 to identify RNA and protein interactions during translation initiation and within stress granules [33]. As the primary helicase acting during translation initiation, eIF4A1 has a well characterized and strong cytoplasmic localization. In this study, all the APEX2 fusion constructs also included strong subcellular localization signals in addition to proteins of interest: NES derived from HIV-1 Rev on eIF4A1, eIF4E, and a GFP control, SV40 NLS on CBX1, and an endoplasmic reticulum signal from CYP2C1. Another group used G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) fused to APEX2 to identify protein-protein interactions that occur during signaling cascades with high spatiotemporal resolution [32]. As GPCRs are membrane-associated proteins, the NESAPEX2 was unlikely to have biased their results. Others used APEX2 fused to two RNA-binding proteins (MS2 coat protein or dCas13a) engineered to include strong nuclear localization signals to tether APEX2 to RNAs of interest (bound by MS2 or dCas13a) and label endogenous proteins bound to those RNAs of interest [55]. Finally, two groups used APEX2 fused to a catalytically inactive Cas9 to label proteins associated with specific genomic loci [56,57]. Altogether, the interactomes identified in these reports using APEX2 are unlikely to have been markedly affected by the cytoplasmic-biased localization of APEX2 due to the strong localization determinants that effectively “over-ride” the putative NES of APEX2.

The subcellular localization of RNA and proteins determines their functions, interactions, and regulation. Methods that can identify the complex networks of interacting RNA and proteins within cells are crucial in understanding development, disease, and degeneration as well as finding therapeutic strategies to extend and improve health-spans and lifespans. Here, we have identified and systematically confirmed a putative NES within the APEX2 proximity labeling peroxidase that may complicate its use for identifying interaction networks for several different types of proteins (e.g., nuclear proteins and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins). While many plant APX1 proteins are named “ascorbate peroxidase, cytosolic” as determined by cell fractionation followed by activity assay or western blot [5862], our studies here are the first to identify and characterize this conserved putative NES, which we speculate is perhaps necessary for preventing promiscuous activity in the plant cell nucleus. APEX2 has been used over other in cellulo biotin labeling methods such as BirA*/BioID [63] or TurboID [64] due to its rapid labeling activity. However, we found that the NES-like activity within APEX2 noticeably slows nuclear translocation on a time-scale of minutes, compared to APEX3. Importantly, we recommend that researchers validate the subcellular localization of proteins of interest with minimal tags relative to their APEX2 fusion proteins, as is common for fluorescent fusion proteins. We encourage those using APEX, APEX2, or split-APEX2 to test APEX3 in their systems to reduce potential unforeseen complications due to active nuclear export. In addition, APEX2 and APEX3 could be used in parallel to generate comparative interactomes of a particular protein of interest.

It is remarkable how mutationally sensitive the APEX2 enzyme is regarding amino acid changes in the conserved NES-containing alpha-helix region. In addition, it is curious that the hydrophobic NESAPEX2 residues that may interact with the nuclear export factor XPO1 are structurally occluded, which suggests dynamic flexibility in the structure of APEX2 throughout the cell. This carboxy-terminal alpha-helix of APEX2 could hinge away from the globular domain, which would allow binding to XPO1 and nuclear export. We would further predict that APEX2 would become transiently inactive during export but regain ascorbate peroxidase activity upon NES helix reorganization in the cytosol. Furthermore, it is possible that (1) post-translational modifications or (2) heme occupancy may modulate the accessibility of this region, or (3) a co-factor may facilitate an indirect interaction between APEX2 and XPO1. However, such post-translational modification machinery and substrate preferences or unknown co-factor for indirect interactions would need to be conserved in plants as well as in humans that lack an APX1 homolog. Finally, we note that while we have not shown a direct interaction between APEX2 and XPO1 here, our data strongly support this region of APEX2 exhibiting NES-like activity and, importantly, led to the rational discovery of APEX3.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmids

APEX2 cDNA was ordered as a gBlock from IDT based on sequence available from GFP-APEX2-NIK3x [34] (Addgene #129274) with synonymous codon optimization to remove restriction enzyme recognition sites and cloned in-frame to the V5 epitope (GKPIPNPLLGLDST) [65]. All APEX2-encoding (and mNeonGreen control) plasmid DNA constructs were cloned using conventional restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligation (New England Biosciences, #M0202L) cloning into a bespoke MIGR1-derived simple retroviral vector [66] encoding blasticidin resistance gene downstream of an IRES. mNeonGreen was ordered as a codon optimized gBlock from IDT based on the published amino acid sequence of mNeonGreen [67]. Codon-optimized cDNA encoding human RELA (NCBI GenBank accession: NP_068810.3) was ordered as a gBlock from IDT. mCherry expression constructs were cloned by PCR amplification with primers encoding amino acid motifs at the carboxy-terminus of mCherry. All amino acid substitutions were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using Phusion DNA Polymerase. Amino acid sequences of mNG-APEX3-V5 and mCherry-NESAPEX2 are provided in Figure S4.

Cell culture, transfections, and transductions

HeLa and 293T cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C/5%CO2/50%H2O. All transfections were performed using TransIT-LT1 (Mirus Bio, #MIR-2306) with OptiMEM serum-free media at the following ratio: 100 μL OptiMEM, 3 μg LT1, and 1 μg DNA. To generate retrovirus for transducing APEX2 expressing vectors, pre-adhered 293T cells in 6-well plates were transfected with 1 μg APEX2 or control package plasmid, 1 μg pMD.Gag/GagPol [68] plasmid, and 200 ng VSV-G [69] plasmid. Media was replaced at 24 hrs post-transfection. Virus-containing supernatant was harvested at 48 hrs post-transfection, 0.45 μm syringe-filtered, and stored at −20°C. Stable cells were generated as described [70]. Briefly, approximately 2,500 target cells (HeLa or 293T) were seeded into a 96-well flat bottom plate, allowed to adhere overnight at 37°C/5%CO2/50%H2O, and 50–200 μL of transducing viral supernatant with 10 μg/mL polybrene added to each well. Transduced cells were selected at 48 hrs post-transduction with 2 μg/mL Blasticidin S (GoldBio, #B-800-100), expanded, and maintained in culture in the presence of drug. Leptomycin B (LMB; Sigma; #L2913, dissolved in methanol) was used at a final concentration of 12.5 nM for two hrs. RELA-APEX/mNG expressing cells were stimulated with TNF (R&D Systems, #210-TA-020; 30 ng/mL) for up to 60 minutes.

Peroxide-dependent proximity labeling

For APEX2 labeling experiments, cells were plated in culture media for 24 hrs, then replaced with culture media containing 500 μM biotin-phenol (Iris Biotech GMBH; #LS3500) and incubated for at least 60 minutes. For peroxide-dependent labeling, H2O2 (Sigma; #H1009) was added to culture media at 100 mM concentration for 60 seconds while gently shaking/swirling. Peroxidase labeling reaction was stopped by removing media and replacing with “quenching solution” containing 10 mM sodium ascorbate (Sigma; #A7631), 10 mM sodium azide (Sigma; #S2002), and 5 mM Trolox (Sigma; #238813) in PBS. Cells were washed twice more with quenching solution. For fluorescence-based detection of labeling, cells were washed with PBS prior to fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes and washed again with PBS.

Immunostaining and fluorescence microscopy

Fixed cells were washed with PBS three times prior to permeabilization in PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100 for 15 minutes. After washing three times with PBS, cells with blocked with PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin (blocking buffer) for one hour. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies detecting V5 epitope (mouse anti-V5; Invitrogen, #R960-25) in blocking buffer for one hour at room temperature or overnight at 4°C at a 1:1000 dilution. Cells were washed thrice with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies in blocking buffer for one hour at room temperatures at the following dilutions: anti-mouse AlexaFluor-568 and streptavidin AlexaFluor-647 each at 1:1000 (Invitrogen; #A11032 and #S32357). Cells were washed once with PBS, incubated with PBS containing DAPI (Sigma; #D9542; 0.1μg/mL) for 15 mins, then washed twice with PBS. We note that imaging fixed and permeabilized cells expressing mNeonGreen exhibited a different distribution than live cells, yet other cells did not exhibit remarkable differences in fixed versus live cells. Cells were imaged using a Nikon Ti-2E widefield microscope using a 20X objective (NA 0.75). Live cell imaging of mNeonGreen-tagged constructs was performed similarly on a Nikon Ti-2E widefield microscope. LMB treatment was performed on live cells for 2 hrs at 12.5 nM alongside vehicle treated cells and/or cells imaged prior to treatment. Images were processed and analyzed using FIJI [71]. Cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio was quantified using integrated fluorescence intensity from each compartment for at least 50 cells per condition. Whole cell streptavidin integrated fluorescence intensity was quantified for at least 50 cells per condition and normalized to the maximum value quantified for wild-type APEX2. All constructs were tested in biological triplicate. Representative images are displayed with mNeonGreen in green, V5 staining in rose, streptavidin staining in blue, and mCherry in magenta. All scale bars represent 10 μm.

Bioinformatic analysis

Sequence logo of NES peptides from UniRef50 for UniProt P48534 containing 266 trimmed UniProt entries with ≥50% identity to Pisum sativum APX1 amino acid sequence (GenBank accession: AAA33645). Amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalOmega [72] in SeaView5 [73]. Aligned sequences corresponding to residues 237 to 249 from Glycine hispida APX1 (GenBank accession: AAD20022) were used to generate the sequence logo using WebLogo [74] (version 2.8.2).

Statistical analyses

GraphPad Prism 9.0 was used for statistical analysis (one-way or two-way ANOVA with corrections for multiple comparisons) of quantitative data presented as mean +/− 95% confidence interval for cytoplasmic-to-nuclear fluorescence intensity ratio or streptavidin intensity.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
4
5

HIGHLIGHTS.

  • APEX2 peroxidase has cytoplasmic localization due to a putative NES

  • Most mutations that eliminate NES activity also disrupt peroxidase function

  • One separation-of-function mutant, L242A, shows unbiased cell-wide localization

  • APEX3 (APEX2-L242A) is a more versatile proximity labeling enzyme

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We wish to acknowledge members of the Harris lab for helpful conversations. We appreciate feedback and critical reading of the manuscript from Arad Moghadasi, Sofia Moraes, and Ryan Langlois. This work was supported by NIAID R37-AI064046, NCI P01-CA234228, and a Recruitment of Established Investigators Award from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT RR220053). Salary support for JTB was provided by NIAID F32-AI147813. RSH is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Ewing Halsell President’s Council Distinguished Chair.

ABBREVIATIONS:

APEX2/3

ascorbate peroxidases

IP

immunoprecipitation

LMB

leptomycin B

mNG

mNeonGreen

NES

nuclear export signal

NLS

nuclear localization signal

POI

protein of interest

PPI

protein-protein interaction

RBP

RNA binding protein

RPI

RNA-protein interaction

XPO1

Exportin-1

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

REFERENCES

  • [1].Khong A, Parker R, The landscape of eukaryotic mRNPs, RNA. 26 (2020) 229–239. 10.1261/rna.073601.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Ivanov P, Kedersha N, Anderson P, Stress Granules and Processing Bodies in Translational Control, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 11 (2019) a032813. 10.1101/cshperspect.a032813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Castello A, Fischer B, Eichelbaum K, Horos R, Beckmann BM, Strein C, Davey NE, Humphreys DT, Preiss T, Steinmetz LM, Krijgsveld J, Hentze MW, Insights into RNA Biology from an Atlas of Mammalian mRNA-Binding Proteins, Cell. 149 (2012) 1393–1406. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Hentze MW, Castello A, Schwarzl T, Preiss T, A brave new world of RNA-binding proteins, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 19 (2018) 327–341. 10.1038/nrm.2017.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Keskin O, Tuncbag N, Gursoy A, Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from the Molecular to the Proteome Level, Chem Rev. 116 (2016) 4884–4909. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Lorenzi L, Chiu H-S, Avila Cobos F, Gross S, Volders P-J, Cannoodt R, Nuytens J, Vanderheyden K, Anckaert J, Lefever S, Tay AP, de Bony EJ, Trypsteen W, Gysens F, Vromman M, Goovaerts T, Hansen TB, Kuersten S, Nijs N, Taghon T, Vermaelen K, Bracke KR, Saeys Y, De Meyer T, Deshpande NP, Anande G, Chen T-W, Wilkins MR, Unnikrishnan A, De Preter K, Kjems J, Koster J, Schroth GP, Vandesompele J, Sumazin P, Mestdagh P, The RNA Atlas expands the catalog of human non-coding RNAs, Nat Biotechnol. 39 (2021) 1453–1465. 10.1038/s41587-021-00936-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Van Treeck B, Parker R, Principles of Stress Granules Revealed by Imaging Approaches, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 11 (2019). 10.1101/cshperspect.a033068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Das S, Vera M, Gandin V, Singer RH, Tutucci E, Intracellular mRNA transport and localized translation, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 22 (2021) 483–504. 10.1038/s41580-021-00356-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Sato H, Das S, Singer RH, Vera M, Imaging of DNA and RNA in Living Eukaryotic Cells to Reveal Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Gene Expression, Annu Rev Biochem. 89 (2020) 159–187. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-011520-104955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Calabretta S, Richard S, Emerging Roles of Disordered Sequences in RNA-Binding Proteins, Trends Biochem. Sci 40 (2015) 662–672. 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Buxbaum AR, Wu B, Singer RH, Single β-actin mRNA detection in neurons reveals a mechanism for regulating its translatability, Science. 343 (2014) 419–422. 10.1126/science.1242939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Chao JA, Yoon YJ, Singer RH, Imaging Translation in Single Cells Using Fluorescent Microscopy, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 4 (2012) a012310. 10.1101/cshperspect.a012310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Cullen BR, Nuclear mRNA export: insights from virology, Trends Biochem. Sci 28 (2003) 419–424. 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00142-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Hammarskjöld ML, Constitutive transport element-mediated nuclear export, Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol 259 (2001) 77–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Isken O, Maquat LE, The multiple lives of NMD factors: balancing roles in gene and genome regulation, Nat Rev Genet. 9 (2008) 699–712. 10.1038/nrg2402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].York A, Kutluay SB, Errando M, Bieniasz PD, The RNA Binding Specificity of Human APOBEC3 Proteins Resembles That of HIV-1 Nucleocapsid, PLoS Pathog. 12 (2016) e1005833. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Apolonia L, Schulz R, Curk T, Rocha P, Swanson CM, Schaller T, Ule J, Malim MH, Promiscuous RNA Binding Ensures Effective Encapsidation of APOBEC3 Proteins by HIV-1, PLoS Pathog. 11 (2015) e1004609. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Takata MA, Gonçalves-Carneiro D, Zang TM, Soll SJ, York A, Blanco-Melo D, Bieniasz PD, CG dinucleotide suppression enables antiviral defence targeting non-self RNA, Nature. (2017). 10.1038/nature24039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Meagher JL, Takata M, Gonçalves-Carneiro D, Keane SC, Rebendenne A, Ong H, Orr VK, MacDonald MR, Stuckey JA, Bieniasz PD, Smith JL, Structure of the zinc-finger antiviral protein in complex with RNA reveals a mechanism for selective targeting of CG-rich viral sequences, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 116 (2019) 24303–24309. 10.1073/pnas.1913232116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Luo X, Wang X, Gao Y, Zhu J, Liu S, Gao G, Gao P, Molecular Mechanism of RNA Recognition by Zinc-Finger Antiviral Protein, Cell Rep. 30 (2020) 46–52.e4. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Korboukh VK, Lee CA, Acevedo A, Vignuzzi M, Xiao Y, Arnold JJ, Hemperly S, Graci JD, August A, Andino R, Cameron CE, RNA virus population diversity, an optimum for maximal fitness and virulence, J. Biol. Chem 289 (2014) 29531–29544. 10.1074/jbc.M114.592303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Te Velthuis AJW, Grimes JM, Fodor E, Structural insights into RNA polymerases of negative-sense RNA viruses, Nat Rev Microbiol. 19 (2021) 303–318. 10.1038/s41579-020-00501-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Xu D, Farmer A, Chook YM, Recognition of nuclear targeting signals by Karyopherin-β proteins, Curr Opin Struct Biol. 20 (2010) 782–790. 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Fung HYJ, Chook YM, Atomic basis of CRM1-cargo recognition, release and inhibition, Semin Cancer Biol. 27 (2014) 52–61. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Wagstaff KM, Rawlinson SM, Hearps AC, Jans DA, An AlphaScreen®-based assay for high-throughput screening for specific inhibitors of nuclear import, J Biomol Screen. 16 (2011) 192–200. 10.1177/1087057110390360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Wagstaff KM, Sivakumaran H, Heaton SM, Harrich D, Jans DA, Ivermectin is a specific inhibitor of importin α/β-mediated nuclear import able to inhibit replication of HIV-1 and dengue virus, Biochem J. 443 (2012) 851–856. 10.1042/BJ20120150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Grosicki S, Simonova M, Spicka I, Pour L, Kriachok I, Gavriatopoulou M, Pylypenko H, Auner HW, Leleu X, Doronin V, Usenko G, Bahlis NJ, Hajek R, Benjamin R, Dolai TK, Sinha DK, Venner CP, Garg M, Gironella M, Jurczyszyn A, Robak P, Galli M, Wallington-Beddoe C, Radinoff A, Salogub G, Stevens DA, Basu S, Liberati AM, Quach H, Goranova-Marinova VS, Bila J, Katodritou E, Oliynyk H, Korenkova S, Kumar J, Jagannath S, Moreau P, Levy M, White D, Gatt ME, Facon T, Mateos MV, Cavo M, Reece D, Anderson LD, Saint-Martin J-R, Jeha J, Joshi AA, Chai Y, Li L, Peddagali V, Arazy M, Shah J, Shacham S, Kauffman MG, Dimopoulos MA, Richardson PG, Delimpasi S, Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, The Lancet. 396 (2020) 1563–1573. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32292-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Qin W, Cho KF, Cavanagh PE, Ting AY, Deciphering molecular interactions by proximity labeling, Nat Methods. 18 (2021) 133–143. 10.1038/s41592-020-01010-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Hung V, Zou P, Rhee H-W, Udeshi ND, Cracan V, Svinkina T, Carr SA, Mootha VK, Ting AY, Proteomic mapping of the human mitochondrial intermembrane space in live cells via ratiometric APEX tagging, Mol Cell. 55 (2014) 332–341. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Lam SS, Martell JD, Kamer KJ, Deerinck TJ, Ellisman MH, Mootha VK, Ting AY, Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling, Nat Methods. 12 (2015) 51–54. 10.1038/nmeth.3179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Zhou Y, Wang G, Wang P, Li Z, Yue T, Wang J, Zou P, Expanding APEX2 Substrates for Proximity-Dependent Labeling of Nucleic Acids and Proteins in Living Cells, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 58 (2019) 11763–11767. 10.1002/anie.201905949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Lobingier BT, Hüttenhain R, Eichel K, Miller KB, Ting AY, von Zastrow M, Krogan NJ, An Approach to Spatiotemporally Resolve Protein Interaction Networks in Living Cells, Cell. 169 (2017) 350–360.e12. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Padrón A, Iwasaki S, Ingolia NT, Proximity RNA Labeling by APEX-Seq Reveals the Organization of Translation Initiation Complexes and Repressive RNA Granules, Mol. Cell 75 (2019) 875–887.e5. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Fazal FM, Han S, Parker KR, Kaewsapsak P, Xu J, Boettiger AN, Chang HY, Ting AY, Atlas of Subcellular RNA Localization Revealed by APEX-Seq, Cell. 178 (2019) 473–490.e26. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Kalderon D, Roberts BL, Richardson WD, Smith AE, A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location, Cell. 39 (1984) 499–509. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90457-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Malim MH, Böhnlein S, Hauber J, Cullen BR, Functional dissection of the HIV-1 Rev trans-activator--derivation of a trans-dominant repressor of Rev function, Cell. 58 (1989) 205–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Fischer U, Huber J, Boelens WC, Mattaj IW, Lührmann R, The HIV-1 Rev activation domain is a nuclear export signal that accesses an export pathway used by specific cellular RNAs, Cell. 82 (1995) 475–483. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90436-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Fridell RA, Bogerd HP, Cullen BR, Nuclear export of late HIV-1 mRNAs occurs via a cellular protein export pathway, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93 (1996) 4421–4424. 10.1073/pnas.93.9.4421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Nishi K, Yoshida M, Fujiwara D, Nishikawa M, Horinouchi S, Beppu T, Leptomycin B targets a regulatory cascade of crm1, a fission yeast nuclear protein, involved in control of higher order chromosome structure and gene expression, J Biol Chem. 269 (1994) 6320–6324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Güttler T, Madl T, Neumann P, Deichsel D, Corsini L, Monecke T, Ficner R, Sattler M, Görlich D, NES consensus redefined by structures of PKI-type and Rev-type nuclear export signals bound to CRM1, Nat Struct Mol Biol. 17 (2010) 1367–1376. 10.1038/nsmb.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Kosugi S, Hasebe M, Tomita M, Yanagawa H, Nuclear export signal consensus sequences defined using a localization-based yeast selection system, Traffic. 9 (2008) 2053–2062. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Xu D, Farmer A, Collett G, Grishin NV, Chook YM, Sequence and structural analyses of nuclear export signals in the NESdb database, Mol Biol Cell. 23 (2012) 3677–3693. 10.1091/mbc.E12-01-0046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Patenaude A-M, Orthwein A, Hu Y, Campo VA, Kavli B, Buschiazzo A, Di Noia JM, Active nuclear import and cytoplasmic retention of activation-induced deaminase, Nat Struct Mol Biol. 16 (2009) 517–527. 10.1038/nsmb.1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Xu D, Marquis K, Pei J, Fu S-C, Cağatay T, Grishin NV, Chook YM, LocNES: a computational tool for locating classical NESs in CRM1 cargo proteins, Bioinformatics. 31 (2015) 1357–1365. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Bernhofer M, Goldberg T, Wolf S, Ahmed M, Zaugg J, Boden M, Rost B, NLSdb-major update for database of nuclear localization signals and nuclear export signals, Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (2018) D503–D508. 10.1093/nar/gkx1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Fu S-C, Imai K, Horton P, Prediction of leucine-rich nuclear export signal containing proteins with NESsential, Nucleic Acids Res. 39 (2011) e111. 10.1093/nar/gkr493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Han Y, Branon TC, Martell JD, Boassa D, Shechner D, Ellisman MH, Ting A, Directed Evolution of Split APEX2 Peroxidase, ACS Chem Biol. 14 (2019) 619–635. 10.1021/acschembio.8b00919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Martell JD, Deerinck TJ, Sancak Y, Poulos TL, Mootha VK, Sosinsky GE, Ellisman MH, Ting AY, Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy, Nat Biotechnol. 30 (2012) 1143–1148. 10.1038/nbt.2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Sharp KH, Mewies M, Moody PCE, Raven EL, Crystal structure of the ascorbate peroxidase-ascorbate complex, Nat Struct Biol. 10 (2003) 303–307. 10.1038/nsb913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Li Q, Verma IM, NF-kappaB regulation in the immune system, Nat Rev Immunol. 2 (2002) 725–734. 10.1038/nri910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Aqdas M, Sung M-H, NF-κB dynamics in the language of immune cells, Trends Immunol. 44 (2023) 32–43. 10.1016/j.it.2022.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Johnson C, Van Antwerp D, Hope TJ, An N-terminal nuclear export signal is required for the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of IkappaBalpha, EMBO J. 18 (1999) 6682–6693. 10.1093/emboj/18.23.6682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Huang TT, Kudo N, Yoshida M, Miyamoto S, A nuclear export signal in the N-terminal regulatory domain of IkappaBalpha controls cytoplasmic localization of inactive NF-kappaB/IkappaBalpha complexes, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 97 (2000) 1014–1019. 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Harhaj EW, Sun S-C, Regulation of RelA Subcellular Localization by a Putative Nuclear Export Signal and p50, Mol Cell Biol. 19 (1999) 7088–7095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Han S, Zhao BS, Myers SA, Carr SA, He C, Ting AY, RNA-protein interaction mapping via MS2- or Cas13-based APEX targeting, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117 (2020) 22068–22079. 10.1073/pnas.2006617117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Myers SA, Wright J, Peckner R, Kalish BT, Zhang F, Carr SA, Discovery of proteins associated with a predefined genomic locus via dCas9-APEX-mediated proximity labeling, Nat Methods. 15 (2018) 437–439. 10.1038/s41592-018-0007-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Gao XD, Tu L-C, Mir A, Rodriguez T, Ding Y, Leszyk J, Dekker J, Shaffer SA, Zhu LJ, Wolfe SA, Sontheimer EJ, C-BERST: defining subnuclear proteomic landscapes at genomic elements with dCas9-APEX2, Nat Methods. 15 (2018) 433–436. 10.1038/s41592-018-0006-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Dalton DA, Russell SA, Hanus FJ, Pascoe GA, Evans HJ, Enzymatic reactions of ascorbate and glutathione that prevent peroxide damage in soybean root nodules, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 83 (1986) 3811–3815. 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Klapheck S, Zimmer I, Cosse H, Scavenging of Hydrogen Peroxide in the Endosperm of Ricinus communis by Ascorbate Peroxidase, Plant and Cell Physiology. 31 (1990) 1005–1013. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a077996. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Mittler R, Zilinskas BA, Purification and characterization of pea cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase, Plant Physiol. 97 (1991) 962–968. 10.1104/pp.97.3.962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Patterson WR, Poulos TL, Crystal structure of recombinant pea cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase, Biochemistry. 34 (1995) 4331–4341. 10.1021/bi00013a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Maruta T, Inoue T, Noshi M, Tamoi M, Yabuta Y, Yoshimura K, Ishikawa T, Shigeoka S, Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 protects organelles against oxidative stress by wounding- and jasmonate-induced H(2)O(2) in Arabidopsis plants, Biochim Biophys Acta. 1820 (2012) 1901–1907. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Choi-Rhee E, Schulman H, Cronan JE, Promiscuous protein biotinylation by Escherichia coli biotin protein ligase, Protein Sci. 13 (2004) 3043–3050. 10.1110/ps.04911804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Branon TC, Bosch JA, Sanchez AD, Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Carr SA, Feldman JL, Perrimon N, Ting AY, Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID, Nat Biotechnol. 36 (2018) 880–887. 10.1038/nbt.4201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Hanke T, Szawlowski P, Randall RE, Construction of solid matrix-antibody-antigen complexes containing simian immunodeficiency virus p27 using tag-specific monoclonal antibody and tag-linked antigen, J Gen Virol. 73 (Pt 3) (1992) 653–660. 10.1099/0022-1317-73-3-653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Evans EL, Becker JT, Fricke SL, Patel K, Sherer NM, HIV-1 Vif’s Capacity To Manipulate the Cell Cycle Is Species Specific, J. Virol 92 (2018). 10.1128/JVI.02102-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Shaner NC, Lambert GG, Chammas A, Ni Y, Cranfill PJ, Baird MA, Sell BR, Allen JR, Day RN, Israelsson M, Davidson MW, Wang J, A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum, Nat. Methods 10 (2013) 407–409. 10.1038/nmeth.2413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Ory DS, Neugeboren BA, Mulligan RC, A stable human-derived packaging cell line for production of high titer retrovirus/vesicular stomatitis virus G pseudotypes, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93 (1996) 11400–11406. 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Naldini L, Blömer U, Gallay P, Ory D, Mulligan R, Gage FH, Verma IM, Trono D, In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector, Science. 272 (1996) 263–267. 10.1126/science.272.5259.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Becker JT, Sherer NM, Subcellular Localization of HIV-1 gag-pol mRNAs Regulates Sites of Virion Assembly, J. Virol 91 (2017). 10.1128/JVI.02315-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods 9 (2012) 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega, Mol Syst Biol. 7 (2011) 539. 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Gouy M, Tannier E, Comte N, Parsons DP, Seaview Version 5: A Multiplatform Software for Multiple Sequence Alignment, Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses, and Tree Reconciliation, Methods Mol Biol. 2231 (2021) 241–260. 10.1007/978-1-0716-1036-7_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE, WebLogo: a sequence logo generator, Genome Res. 14 (2004) 1188–1190. 10.1101/gr.849004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3
4
5

RESOURCES