Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1992 Feb;67(2):193–199. doi: 10.1136/hrt.67.2.193

Continuity equation and Gorlin formula compared with directly observed orifice area in native and prosthetic aortic valves.

J B Chambers 1, D C Sprigings 1, T Cochrane 1, J Allen 1, R Morris 1, M M Black 1, G Jackson 1
PMCID: PMC1024754  PMID: 1540443

Abstract

Orifice areas calculated by the continuity and Gorlin equations have been shown to correlate well in vivo. The continuity equation, however, gives underestimates compared with the Gorlin formula and it is not clear which is the more accurate. Both equations have therefore been tested against maximal orifice area measured by planimetry in eight prepared native aortic valves and four bioprostheses. A computer controlled, ventricular flow simulator (cycled at 70 beats/min) was used at five different stroke volumes that gave cardiac outputs of 2.8 to 7.0 l/min. The mean difference between measured and estimated orifice area was zero for the continuity equation, but -0.14 cm2 for the conventional Gorlin formula. Thus the Gorlin formula tended to give overestimates compared with both measured area and area estimated by the continuity equation, probably because of the effect of pressure recovery. When predictive equations derived from these data were tested, residual standard deviations were around 0.3 cm2 at all stroke volumes for the continuity equation, around 0.2 cm2 for the invasive Gorlin formula, and between 0.2 and 0.4 cm2 for the modified Gorlin formula. These results suggest that estimates of orifice area in an individual valve as judged by any of the equations tested should be seen as a guide to rather than as a precise measure of actual orific area.

Full text

PDF
193

Images in this article

194Image
on p.194
195Image
on p.195
195Image
on p.195

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chambers J. B., Cochrane T., Black M. M., Jackson G. The Gorlin formula validated against directly observed orifice area in porcine mitral bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Feb;13(2):348–353. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90510-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark C. The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis--I. Theory and steady flow experiments. J Biomech. 1976;9(8):521–528. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(76)90068-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen M. V., Gorlin R. Modified orifice equation for the calculation of mitral valve area. Am Heart J. 1972 Dec;84(6):839–840. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(72)90080-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GORLIN R., GORLIN S. G. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J. 1951 Jan;41(1):1–29. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(51)90002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goli V. D., Teague S. M., Prasad R., Harvey J., Voyles W. F., Olson E. G., Schechter E., Thadani U. Noninvasive evaluation of aortic stenosis severity utilizing Doppler ultrasound and electrical bioimpedance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jan;11(1):66–71. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90168-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kennedy K. D., Nishimura R. A., Holmes D. R., Jr, Bailey K. R. Natural history of moderate aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Feb;17(2):313–319. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80092-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nademanee K., Intarachot V., Josephson M. A., Rieders D., Vaghaiwalla Mody F., Singh B. N. Prognostic significance of silent myocardial ischemia in patients with unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Jul;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Oh J. K., Taliercio C. P., Holmes D. R., Jr, Reeder G. S., Bailey K. R., Seward J. B., Tajik A. J. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jun;11(6):1227–1234. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Otto C. M., Pearlman A. S., Comess K. A., Reamer R. P., Janko C. L., Huntsman L. L. Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Mar;7(3):509–517. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80460-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pasipoularides A., Murgo J. P., Bird J. J., Craig W. E. Fluid dynamics of aortic stenosis: mechanisms for the presence of subvalvular pressure gradients. Am J Physiol. 1984 Apr;246(4 Pt 2):H542–H550. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1984.246.4.H542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Richards K. L., Cannon S. R., Miller J. F., Crawford M. H. Calculation of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography: a direct application of the continuity equation. Circulation. 1986 May;73(5):964–969. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.5.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schoen F. J., Kujovich J. L., Webb C. L., Levy R. J. Chemically determined mineral content of explanted porcine aortic valve bioprostheses: correlation with radiographic assessment of calcification and clinical data. Circulation. 1987 Nov;76(5):1061–1066. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.5.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Segal J., Lerner D. J., Miller D. C., Mitchell R. S., Alderman E. A., Popp R. L. When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Jun;9(6):1294–1305. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Skjaerpe T., Hegrenaes L., Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1985 Oct;72(4):810–818. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.4.810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stamm R. B., Martin R. P. Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Oct;2(4):707–718. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80311-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Teirstein P., Yeager M., Yock P. G., Popp R. L. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: a noninvasive application of the Gorlin formula. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Nov;8(5):1059–1065. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80382-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thubrikar M., Bosher L. P., Nolan S. P. The mechanism of opening of the aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979 Jun;77(6):863–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tindale W. B., Trowbridge E. A. Modification of the Gorlin equation for use with heart valve substitutes. Cardiovasc Res. 1986 Jun;20(6):458–465. doi: 10.1093/cvr/20.6.458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zoghbi W. A., Farmer K. L., Soto J. G., Nelson J. G., Quinones M. A. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1986 Mar;73(3):452–459. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.3.452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES