Skip to main content
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
. 2021 May 19;17(3):443–447. doi: 10.1177/15598276211015137

Motivations Behind Lifestyle Changes

Calder Dorn 1,, Sean Phillips 1, Sierra Nicol 1, Holly Russell 1, Elisabeth Guenther 1
PMCID: PMC10248364  PMID: 37304743

Abstract

Lifestyle modification has been demonstrated as a powerful tool in combating the morbidity and mortality of disease. Due to lack of training or education not enough physicians are discussing lifestyle changes with patients. The objective of this study was to determine what influenced participants to make lifestyle changes, and if it was a physician, what was said or done to motivate that decision. Inclusion criterion was participants were enrolled in a program dedicated to dietary modifications. One hundred participants were surveyed. Eighty-eight percent were over the age of 50; 78% were female; 92% were White; and 70% had a bachelor’s degree or higher. Sixty-eight percent felt they had not been educated by their health care provider about nutrition; 41% of participants felt information provided was the most impactful statement; 60% of participants noted that their medical diagnosis had a moderate to significant impact on their decision to make a lifestyle change. This study emphasizes that dietary modifications are not being discussed enough to alter the health decisions of patients in the clinical setting. Furthermore, it is paramount physicians take into account patient motivations when discussing lifestyle changes, as well as the role that proper patient education plays in motivating patients to make a change.

Keywords: lifestyle, nutrition, patient counseling, dietary choices


Despite the 1998 National Institutes of Health guidelines, which recommended that physicians counsel overweight and obese patients to lose weight, obesity is still increasing in prevalence and not enough patients are being counseled.

Lifestyle choices contribute to a large percentage of fatalities annually. Heart disease and cancer (599 108) accounted for 23% and 21.3%, respectively, of total US deaths in 2017, both of which have strong links to lifestyle choices. 1 Additionally, heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and obesity account for 75% of health care costs, but they can often be prevented and their progression can be mitigated or reversed with lifestyle changes. 2 Despite the 1998 National Institutes of Health guidelines, which recommended that physicians counsel overweight and obese patients to lose weight, obesity is still increasing in prevalence and not enough patients are being counseled.3,4 Lifestyle medicine is an emerging and evolving field of care that seeks to address the root causes of disease rather than just treat the symptoms. 5 Root causes include what we eat, how we move, the chemicals we choose, and how we deal with stress. Addressing these root causes has been shown to improve health and prevent, and even reverse, disease. One study showed that adhering to intensive lifestyle change, such as a whole food vegetarian diet, aerobic exercise, and smoking cessation, can actually reverse coronary heart disease.6,7 Additionally, following a vegetarian or vegan diet lowered the risk for type 2 diabetes, and following a low-fat vegan diet improved A1C and lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.8,9

Several studies have shown the positive effects physicians can have on the lifestyles of their patients.9-14 When physicians do bring up weight with obese patients, they are more likely to perceive themselves as overweight and attempt to lose weight. 10 However, another study found that even when physicians did discuss weight, diet, or physical activity with a patient, the patients’ did not report that they remembered having the conversation. This implies that physicians’ approach to counseling patients on lifestyle changes is often not affecting patients the way it could. 11 In another study, it was found that only 20% to 25% of physicians actually counseled their patients and suggested that counseling by physicians should be promoted more. 12 Additionally, not enough physician-patient conversations that involve diet and lifestyle modifications are being had, because physicians feel unprepared to successfully tackle these conversations. 13 It was found that physicians’ use of motivational interviewing techniques and empathy while discussing weight loss increases the likelihood that a patient attempts to lose weight. 14 A broad range of both verbal and nonverbal communication behaviors are associated with positive health outcomes such as empathy, humor, clarity, health education, and more. 15 However, few studies have focused on what specifically motivated a patient to change their lifestyle. With an increased correlation between diet and health, we seek to investigate ways in which physicians can motivate nutritional decisions.

Methods

Participants were individuals who currently attend or have attended a lifestyle medicine course taught by a physician assistant board certified in lifestyle medicine by the American College of Lifestyle Medicine. The course was started in June of 2018, and discusses topics such as diabetes, cancer, heart disease, the importance of fiber, weight management, food addiction and behavior change, nutritional myths, and whole-food plant-based diets.

An anonymous, online survey was developed and administered through the web-based survey system Qualtrics. This survey was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Western University of Health Sciences. The survey contained 18 questions, with 7 based on elucidating participant demographics and 11 focused on assessing what influenced their decision to make a lifestyle change. The beginning of the survey contained an informed consent and participants were permitted to skip any questions that they did not feel comfortable answering (see the Appendix for Informed Consent & Survey, available online).

In May 2020, a link to the survey on Qualtrics was distributed with the help of the PA via an email list-serve of all current and past participants. The survey was closed for further submissions in July 2020, with 2 email reminders sent out in the interim through the PA’s list-serve.

Results

Demographics of participants is listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of the Participants Surveyed.

N %
Age (years)
 18-19 0 0%
 20-29 1 1%
 30-39 3 3%
 40-49 8 8%
 50-59 24 24%
 60-69 39 39%
 70-80 23 23%
 Over 80 2 2%
Gender
 Male 22 22%
 Female 78 78%
Race
 White 91 92%
 African American or African American 0 0%
 American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0%
 Asian 1 1%
 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0%
 Hispanic/Latino(a) 3 3%
 Mixed race 2 2%
 Other 2 2%
Highest level of education
 Less than high school 0 0%
 High school graduate or equivalent (eg, GED) 5 5%
 Some college, no degree 13 13%
 Associate degree (eg, AA, AS) 12 12%
 Bachelor’s degree (eg, BA, BS) 37 37%
 Master’s degree (eg, MA, MS, MEd) 26 26%
 Professional degree (eg, MD, DDS, DVM) 2 2%
 Doctorate (eg, PhD, EdD) 5 5%

Our study found that 81% of participants reported that their health care provider (HCP) spoke to them about dietary modifications; however, 68% of participants felt they had not been properly educated about nutrition by their HCP. Thirty-eight percent had never discussed diet changes with their HCP, while 38% had only discussed diet changes 1 or 2 times. Of those that discussed diet changes with their HCP, 59% never mentioned a whole-food plant-based diet. When asked about the influence of various factors on their dietary changes, 56% stated that HCP had no to moderate influence, 53% stated that family and friends had a moderate to significant influence, and 60% stated that their medical diagnosis had a moderate to significant influence. When asked about impactful statements made by their HCP, 41% noted the information provided, 34% found concern over long-term health to be impactful, 31% were impacted by how the provider spoke to them, and 30% were impacted by shared personal benefit. When asked about the most impactful statement, 21% found that the information provided was the most impactful (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The most impactful statements made by the health care provided (HCP)

Discussion

Despite the fact that improved nutrition is considered one of the most important methods for combating disease, 16 our study further demonstrated that physicians still are not talking about nutrition. This observation appears to reflect the current literature on the lack of nutrition counseling provided by physicians, with fewer than 13.5% of today’s physicians feeling adequately trained to discuss nutrition with their patients, the majority of which devote less than 3 minutes to such discussions. 17 Of those who did discuss nutrition with their patients, whole-food plant-based was rarely mentioned despite the overwhelming evidence a whole-food plant-based diet can improve health outcomes in the right patient populations.18-20 This observation only further highlights the paucity of proper nutrition counseling and lack of proper physician education. While many programs to help bridge this gap in knowledge currently exist, 21 there still appears to be an insufficient amount of proper training in place that would give practicing physicians the confidence to initiate discussion on diet and nutrition. Modification of the medical curriculum offers itself as one such solution; however, a majority of medical schools still fail to adequately incorporate nutrition in their curriculum.22,23 Our study clearly indicates that there is still an opportunity to further expand discussion on how best to train physicians to engage in meaningful conversations with their patients on the role of diet in their health.

The motivation underlying people’s decision to change their behavior is multifaceted. Every participant ranked HCP and family/friends as having some impact on their decision to alter their diet, with the HCP having the lowest impact out of all 3 categories. It is well understood that a strong physician-patient relationship is necessary in order to achieve maximal health outcomes. 24 However, as our study indicates, it is paramount to take into consideration the role of an individual’s community on their health. Prior studies have demonstrated the significant impact that partners and other members of the individuals’ social circle have on diet changes and adherence to those changes.25,26 Therefore, it is paramount that the physician consider these individuals as an integral part of the health care team, when developing a lifestyle change strategy with their patients. In addition to the role of the HCP and family/friends on lifestyle change, our study indicated that the patient’s own diagnosis had the greatest impact on a participant’s motivation for change. Consistent with current literature, the perceived consequences associated with someone’s medical diagnosis provides an important intrinsic motivator for change.27,28 Therefore, it is imperative that physicians adequately communicate with their patient’s the nature of the disease as this information is often taken into consideration in the individual’s decision to move toward a lifestyle change.

The unique role of the physician in helping motivate lifestyle change cannot be overstated. As such, it is necessary that physicians have the skills necessary to effectively communicate and motivate their patients to make lifestyle changes. Motivational interview is one such method that has been shown to successfully motivate patients to make changes to their diet and exercise habits. 29 Our study highlights statements that can be utilized within the motivational interview framework. Information provided had the greatest impact, highlighting the importance of patient education. This is consistent with current literature that finds patient education strongly contributes to behavior and lifestyle change. 30 Therefore, it is important for physicians to properly educate their patients when counseling their patient to change in lifestyle or behavior. This education should not only include strategies for change and resources but should also highlight the nature and severity of the disease, which our study found plays an integral role in an individual’s motivation to change their lifestyle.

There are several limitations to consider with our data. The data were collected from self-reported surveys. Thus, we were unable to control for respondent bias. In addition, the demographics of our respondents reflects those of rural Oregon; however, these findings may not be generalizable to a more diverse patient population. Finally, our small sample size in this preliminary study restricts large-scale conclusions and generalizations, but it still shows possible patterns that warrant further investigation and consideration. While we cannot show statistical significances due to the small sample size, the findings are noticeable and may help expose obstacles facing the rural population.

Conclusion

While it has been established that nutrition and lifestyle change have a positive impact on health outcomes, our pilot study found that a minority of physicians are having conversations with their patients. This highlights the need for further discussion on how to best educate and motivate physicians to have discussions with the patients regarding nutrition and lifestyle changes. When considering the best method to counsel patients, our study found that it is important for the HCP to consider the impact of a patient’s medical diagnosis and contribution of family and friends in a patient’s decision to make a lifestyle change. Furthermore, we found that when counseling patients it is important for physicians to provide the proper information for their patient to make an educated decision on modifying their lifestyle. However, further research is needed to determine the role of the physician in patient adherence to lifestyle changes.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-ajl-10.1177_15598276211015137 – Supplemental material for Motivations Behind Lifestyle Changes

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-ajl-10.1177_15598276211015137 for Motivations Behind Lifestyle Changes by Calder Dorn, Sean Phillips, Sierra Nicol, Holly Russell and Elisabeth Guenther in American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine

Footnotes

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Informed Consent: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Trial Registration: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any clinical trials.

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult obesity causes & consequences. Published September 17, 2020. Accessed December 22, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/causes.html
  • 2.Ornish D.Intensive lifestyle changes and health reform. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:638-639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abid A, Galuska D, Khan LK, Gillespie C, Ford ES, Serdula MK.Are healthcare professionals advising obese patients to lose weight? A trend analysis. MedGenMed. 2005;7:10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.National Institutes of Health. Overweight & obesity statistics. Accessed December 22, 2020. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/overweight-obesity
  • 5.Bodai B.Lifestyle medicine: a brief review of its dramatic impact on health and survival. Perm J. 2018;22:17-025. doi: 10.7812/tpp/17-025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ornish D, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH, et al. Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1998;280:2001-2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Esselstyn CB.A plant-based diet and coronary artery disease: a mandate for effective therapy. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017;14:317-320. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tonstad S, Butler T, Yan R, Fraser GE.Type of vegetarian diet, body weight, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:791-796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barnard ND, Cohen J, Jenkins DJA, et al. A low-fat vegan diet improves glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in a randomized clinical trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1777-1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Baron RB. Telling patients they are overweight or obese: an insult or an effective intervention? Comment on “The influence of physician acknowledgment of patients’ weight status on patient perceptions of overweight and obesity in the United States.” Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:321-322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Greiner KA, Born W, Hall S, Hou Q, Kimminau KS, Ahluwalia JS.Discussing weight with obese primary care patients: physician and patient perceptions. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:581-587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anis NA, Lee RE, Ellerbeck EF, Nazir N, Greiner KA, Ahluwalia JS.Direct observation of physician counseling on dietary habits and exercise: patient, physician, and office correlates. Prev Med. 2004;38:198-202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ammerman AS, Devellis BM, Haines PS, et al. Nutrition education for cardiovascular disease prevention among low income populations—description and pilot evaluation of a physician-based model. Patient Educ Couns. 1992;19:5-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pollak KI, Østbye T, Alexander SC, et al. Empathy goes a long way in weight loss discussions. J Fam Pract. 2007;56:1031-1036. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD.Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15:25-38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Murray CJL. The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310:591-608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harkin N, Johnston E, Mathews T, et al. Physicians’ dietary knowledge, attitudes, and counseling practices: the experience of a single health care center at changing the landscape for dietary education. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019;13:292-300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vetter ML, Herring SJ, Sood M, Shah NR, Kalet al. What do resident physicians know about nutrition? An evaluation of attitudes, self-perceived proficiency and knowledge. J Am Coll Nutr. 2008;27:287-298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jakše B, Jakše B, Pinter S, et al. Dietary intakes and cardiovascular health of healthy adults in short-, medium-, and long-term whole-food plant-based lifestyle program. Nutrients. 2019;12:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Greger M.A whole food plant-based diet is effective for weight loss: the evidence. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020;14:500-510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lazarus K.Nutrition practices of family physicians after education by a physician nutrition specialist. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(6 suppl):2007S-2009S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kushner RF, Van Horn L, Rock CL, et al. Nutrition education in medical school: a time of opportunity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(5 suppl):1167S-173S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Adams KM, Butsch WS, Kohlmeier M.The state of nutrition education at US medical schools. J Biomed Educ. 2015;2015:1-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fuertes JN, Mislowack A, Bennett J, et al. The physician-patient working alliance. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:29-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tripathee S, Sweeting H, Chambers S, Maclean A.How men receive and utilise partner support when trying to change their diet and physical activity within a men’s weight management programme. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang ML, Pbert L, Lemon SC.Influence of family, friend and coworker social support and social undermining on weight gain prevention among adults: support and social undermining on weight gain prevention. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22:1973-1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ogden J, Karim L, Choudry A, Brown K.Understanding successful behaviour change: the role of intentions, attitudes to the target and motivations and the example of diet. Health Educ Res. 2007;22:397-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lundahl B, Burke BL.The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65:1232-1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martins RK, McNeil DW.Review of motivational interviewing in promoting health behaviors. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:283-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mullen PD, Simons-Morton DG, Ramírez G, Frankowski RF, Green LW, Mains DA.A meta-analysis of trials evaluating patient education and counseling for three groups of preventive health behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;32:157-173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-pdf-1-ajl-10.1177_15598276211015137 – Supplemental material for Motivations Behind Lifestyle Changes

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-ajl-10.1177_15598276211015137 for Motivations Behind Lifestyle Changes by Calder Dorn, Sean Phillips, Sierra Nicol, Holly Russell and Elisabeth Guenther in American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine


Articles from American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES