Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1993 Mar;69(3):237–240. doi: 10.1136/hrt.69.3.237

Progression of aortic valve dysfunction in 51 adult patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve: assessment and follow up by Doppler echocardiography.

R T Pachulski 1, K L Chan 1
PMCID: PMC1024987  PMID: 8461222

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the pattern and progression of aortic valve dysfunction by serial Doppler echocardiographic examinations in ambulatory adult patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. DESIGN AND SETTING--Retrospective analysis of patients referred for Doppler echocardiography over a four year period. SUBJECTS--Fifty one adult patients with echocardiographic diagnosis of congenital bicuspid aortic valve had serial Doppler echocardiographic studies at least six months apart. There were 40 men and 11 women with a mean age of 36 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Doppler echocardiographic values of aortic valve dysfunction. Cardiac events including endocarditis and aortic valve replacement were also evaluated. RESULT--Coarctation was present in five patients. 31 (61%) patients had a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve defined as a mean gradient < 25 mm Hg and mild regurgitation. Significant aortic regurgitation was present in 15 patients (moderate in 12 and severe in three). Three patients had isolated aortic stenosis and two patients had combined aortic valve dysfunction. At a median follow up of 21 months (range six to 46 months), six patients had aortic valve surgery (one for aortic stenosis, three for aortic regurgitation, and two for endocarditis). Only 22 patients (43%) continued to have a functionally normal aortic valve. CONCLUSION--In this cohort of fairly young patients, aortic regurgitation is more common than aortic stenosis. Progression of aortic valve dysfunction occurs in patients with pre-existing valve dysfunction and even in those with normal aortic valve function at the initial echocardiographic examination.

Full text

PDF
237

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brandenburg R. O., Jr, Tajik A. J., Edwards W. D., Reeder G. S., Shub C., Seward J. B. Accuracy of 2-dimensional echocardiographic diagnosis of congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: echocardiographic-anatomic correlation in 115 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1983 May 15;51(9):1469–1473. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90659-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell M. Calcific aortic stenosis and congenital bicuspid aortic valves. Br Heart J. 1968 Sep;30(5):606–616. doi: 10.1136/hrt.30.5.606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ciobanu M., Abbasi A. S., Allen M., Hermer A., Spellberg R. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis and estimation of severity of aortic insufficiency. Am J Cardiol. 1982 Feb 1;49(2):339–343. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90510-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edwards W. D., Leaf D. S., Edwards J. E. Dissecting aortic aneurysm associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 1978 May;57(5):1022–1025. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.57.5.1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fenoglio J. J., Jr, McAllister H. A., Jr, DeCastro C. M., Davia J. E., Cheitlin M. D. Congenital bicuspid aortic valve after age 20. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Feb;39(2):164–169. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(77)80186-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hahn R. T., Roman M. J., Mogtader A. H., Devereux R. B. Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Feb;19(2):283–288. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90479-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mills P., Leech G., Davies M., Leathan A. The natural history of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Br Heart J. 1978 Sep;40(9):951–957. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.9.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Olson L. J., Subramanian R., Edwards W. D. Surgical pathology of pure aortic insufficiency: a study of 225 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984 Dec;59(12):835–841. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65618-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pachulski R. T., Weinberg A. L., Chan K. L. Aortic aneurysm in patients with functionally normal or minimally stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Apr 1;67(8):781–782. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90544-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Perry G. J., Helmcke F., Nanda N. C., Byard C., Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Apr;9(4):952–959. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80254-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Raizada V., Roth R., Abrams J., Schroeder K. Superiority of two-dimensional echocardiography in the diagnosis of congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. Jpn Heart J. 1982 May;23(3):305–313. doi: 10.1536/ihj.23.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roberts W. C. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol. 1970 Jul;26(1):72–83. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(70)90761-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Snider A. R., Silverman N. H. Suprasternal notch echocardiography: a two-dimensional technique for evaluating congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1981 Jan;63(1):165–173. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.63.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Subramanian R., Olson L. J., Edwards W. D. Surgical pathology of combined aortic stenosis and insufficiency: a study of 213 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1985 Apr;60(4):247–254. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60317-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Subramanian R., Olson L. J., Edwards W. D. Surgical pathology of pure aortic stenosis: a study of 374 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984 Oct;59(10):683–690. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zema M. J., Caccavano M. Two dimensional echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve morphology: feasibility of bicuspid valve detection. Prospective study of 100 adult patients. Br Heart J. 1982 Nov;48(5):428–433. doi: 10.1136/hrt.48.5.428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES