Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
editorial
. 1992 Aug;68(2):161–162. doi: 10.1136/hrt.68.8.161

Extending the use of autologous arterial conduits in myocardial revascularisation

Gianni D Angelini 1,2, Alan J Bryan 1,2
PMCID: PMC1025004  PMID: 1389729

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barner H. B., Naunheim K. S., Fiore A. C., Fischer V. W., Harris H. H. Use of the inferior epigastric artery as a free graft for myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991 Sep;52(3):429–437. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)90902-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron A., Davis K. B., Green G. E., Myers W. O., Pettinger M. Clinical implications of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study experience. Circulation. 1988 Apr;77(4):815–819. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.4.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaikhouni A., Crawford F. A., Kochel P. J., Olanoff L. S., Halushka P. V. Human internal mammary artery produces more prostacyclin than saphenous vein. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Jul;92(1):88–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cosgrove D. M., Loop F. D. Techniques to maximize mammary artery length. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985 Jul;40(1):78–79. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)61176-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cosgrove D. M., Lytle B. W., Loop F. D., Taylor P. C., Stewart R. W., Gill C. C., Golding L. A., Goormastic M. Does bilateral internal mammary artery grafting increase surgical risk? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 May;95(5):850–856. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eng J., Wells F. C. Morbidity following coronary artery revascularisation with the internal mammary artery. Int J Cardiol. 1991 Jan;30(1):55–59. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(91)90124-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fiore A. C., Naunheim K. S., Dean P., Kaiser G. C., Pennington G., Willman V. L., McBride L. R., Barner H. B. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Feb;49(2):202–209. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90139-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Furchgott R. F., Zawadzki J. V. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature. 1980 Nov 27;288(5789):373–376. doi: 10.1038/288373a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Galbut D. L., Traad E. A., Dorman M. J., DeWitt P. L., Larsen P. B., Kurlansky P. A., Button J. H., Ally J. M., Gentsch T. O. Seventeen-year experience with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Feb;49(2):195–201. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90138-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grossi E. A., Esposito R., Harris L. J., Crooke G. A., Galloway A. C., Colvin S. B., Culliford A. T., Baumann F. G., Yao K., Spencer F. C. Sternal wound infections and use of internal mammary artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Sep;102(3):342–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hazelrigg S. R., Wellons H. A., Jr, Schneider J. A., Kolm P. Wound complications after median sternotomy. Relationship to internal mammary grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Dec;98(6):1096–1099. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hurlbut D., Myers M. L., Lefcoe M., Goldbach M. Pleuropulmonary morbidity: internal thoracic artery versus saphenous vein graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Dec;50(6):959–964. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)91129-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kouchoukos N. T., Wareing T. H., Murphy S. F., Pelate C., Marshall W. G., Jr Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Feb;49(2):210–219. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90140-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Loop F. D., Lytle B. W., Cosgrove D. M., Mahfood S., McHenry M. C., Goormastic M., Stewart R. W., Golding L. A., Taylor P. C. J. Maxwell Chamberlain memorial paper. Sternal wound complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: early and late mortality, morbidity, and cost of care. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Feb;49(2):179–187. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90136-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Loop F. D., Lytle B. W., Cosgrove D. M., Stewart R. W., Goormastic M., Williams G. W., Golding L. A., Gill C. C., Taylor P. C., Sheldon W. C. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 2;314(1):1–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601023140101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lytle B. W., Cosgrove D. M., Saltus G. L., Taylor P. C., Loop F. D. Multivessel coronary revascularization without saphenous vein: long-term results of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983 Nov;36(5):540–547. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60684-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lüscher T. F., Diederich D., Siebenmann R., Lehmann K., Stulz P., von Segesser L., Yang Z. H., Turina M., Grädel E., Weber E. Difference between endothelium-dependent relaxation in arterial and in venous coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 1988 Aug 25;319(8):462–467. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198808253190802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. O'Neil G. S., Chester A. H., Allen S. P., Luu T. N., Tadjkarimi S., Ridley P., Khagani A., Musumeci F., Yacoub M. H. Endothelial function of human gastroepiploic artery. Implications for its use as a bypass graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Oct;102(4):561–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Oku T., Yamane S., Suma H., Satoh H., Koike R., Sawada Y., Takeuchi A. Comparison of prostacyclin production of human gastroepiploic artery and saphenous vein. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 May;49(5):767–770. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90018-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Radomski M. W., Palmer R. M., Moncada S. The anti-aggregating properties of vascular endothelium: interactions between prostacyclin and nitric oxide. Br J Pharmacol. 1987 Nov;92(3):639–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1987.tb11367.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rankin J. S., Newman G. E., Bashore T. M., Muhlbaier L. H., Tyson G. S., Jr, Ferguson T. B., Jr, Reves J. G., Sabiston D. C., Jr Clinical and angiographic assessment of complex mammary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Nov;92(5):832–846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sims F. H. The internal mammary artery as a bypass graft? Ann Thorac Surg. 1987 Jul;44(1):2–3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62341-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Suma H., Wanibuchi Y., Furuta S., Isshiki T., Yamaguchi T., Takanashi R. Comparative study between the gastroepiploic and the internal thoracic artery as a coronary bypass graft. Size, flow, patency, histology. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991;5(5):244–247. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(91)90171-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vahl C. F., Carl I., Müller-Vahl H., Struck E. Brachial plexus injury after cardiac surgery. The role of internal mammary artery preparation: a prospective study on 1000 consecutive patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Nov;102(5):724–729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vander Salm T. J., Chowdhary S., Okike O. N., Pezzella A. T., Pasque M. K. Internal mammary artery grafts: the shortest route to the coronary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Mar;47(3):421–427. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90386-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. van Son J. A., Smedts F., Vincent J. G., van Lier H. J., Kubat K. Comparative anatomic studies of various arterial conduits for myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 Apr;99(4):703–707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES