Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1993 May;69(5):399–403. doi: 10.1136/hrt.69.5.399

Permanent pacing after cardiac transplantation.

C D Scott 1, J M McComb 1, J H Dark 1, R S Bexton 1
PMCID: PMC1025101  PMID: 8518062

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To determine the need for long-term pacing and optimum mode of pacing in cardiac transplant recipients. DESIGN--(a) A retrospective review of patient records. (b) A prospective study of pacemaker use by 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiography before and after reprogramming to minimise use of pacemakers. SETTING--Outpatient clinic, supra-regional cardiopulmonary transplant unit. PATIENTS--All 21 patients at this centre who had received permanent pacemakers after cardiac transplantation. 18 of 19 survivors completed the prospective part of the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--The presence of pacing during a 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recording (programming: 50 beats/min, rate sensor inactivated). RESULTS--21 of 191 (11%) recipients surviving one month or more received permanent pacemakers. The indication was sinus node dysfunction in 13 (62%) and atrioventricular (AV) block in eight (38%). Patients who paced on follow up 12 lead electrocardiograms declined from 38% at three months to 10% at three years after transplantation. After programming to 50 beats/min only five of 18 (28%) patients paced during a 24 hour ambulatory recording. Four of 11 (36%) recipients who received pacemakers for sinus node dysfunction paced compared with one of seven patients (14%) paced for AV block. No patient who had a pacemaker before the 16th day after operation continued to pace whereas five of nine implanted later were used long-term. CONCLUSION--Only five of 18 (28%) patients with pacemakers continued to pace long-term. Continued pacing was more common in those with persistent sinus node dysfunction after the second week after operation but the need for long-term pacing was not predictable.

Full text

PDF
399

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexopoulos D., Yusuf S., Johnston J. A., Bostock J., Sleight P., Yacoub M. H. The 24-hour heart rate behavior in long-term survivors of cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Apr 15;61(11):880–884. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90363-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bexton R. S., Nathan A. W., Hellestrand K. J., Cory-Pearce R., Spurrell R. A., English T. A., Camm A. J. Electrophysiological abnormalities in the transplanted human heart. Br Heart J. 1983 Dec;50(6):555–563. doi: 10.1136/hrt.50.6.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bexton R. S., Nathan A. W., Hellestrand K. J., Cory-Pearce R., Spurrell R. A., English T. A., Camm A. J. Sinoatrial function after cardiac transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Mar;3(3):712–723. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80247-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cook L. S., Will K. R., Moran J. Treatment of junctional rhythm after heart transplantation with terbutaline. J Heart Transplant. 1989 Jul-Aug;8(4):342–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DiBiase A., Tse T. M., Schnittger I., Wexler L., Stinson E. B., Valantine H. A. Frequency and mechanism of bradycardia in cardiac transplant recipients and need for pacemakers. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Jun 15;67(16):1385–1389. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebagosti A., Gueunoun M., Saadjian A., Dolla E., Gabriel M., Levy S., Torresani J. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with VVI pacing and sequential pacing with special reference to VA retrograde conduction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1929–1934. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06330.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher M., Kase C. S., Stelle B., Mills R. M., Jr Ischemic stroke after cardiac pacemaker implantation in sick sinus syndrome. Stroke. 1988 Jun;19(6):712–715. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.6.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heinz G., Ohner T., Laufer G., Gasic S., Laczkovics A. Clinical and electrophysiologic correlates of sinus node dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation. Observations in 42 patients. Chest. 1990 Apr;97(4):890–895. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.4.890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacquet L., Ziady G., Stein K., Griffith B., Armitage J., Hardesty R., Kormos R. Cardiac rhythm disturbances early after orthotopic heart transplantation: prevalence and clinical importance of the observed abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Oct;16(4):832–837. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80330-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jose A. D. Effect of combined sympathetic and parasympathetic blockade on heart rate and cardiac function in man. Am J Cardiol. 1966 Sep;18(3):476–478. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(66)90073-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LOWER R. R., STOFER R. C., SHUMWAY N. E. Homovital transplantation of the heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1961 Feb;41:196–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Loria K., Salinger M., McDonough T., Frohlich T., Arentzen C. Activitrax AAIR pacing for sinus node dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation: an initial report. J Heart Transplant. 1988 Sep-Oct;7(5):380–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mackintosh A. F., Carmichael D. J., Wren C., Cory-Pearce R., English T. A. Sinus node function in first three weeks after cardiac transplantation. Br Heart J. 1982 Dec;48(6):584–588. doi: 10.1136/hrt.48.6.584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Markewitz A., Kemkes B. M., Reble B., Osterholzer G., Reichart B., Puricelii C., Feruglio G. A., Sternotti G., Behrenbeck D. W. Particularities of dual chamber pacemaker therapy in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 Mar;10(2):326–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb05972.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Markewitz A., Kemkes B. M., Reble B., Osterholzer G., Reichart B., Puricelii C., Feruglio G. A., Sternotti G., Behrenbeck D. W. Particularities of dual chamber pacemaker therapy in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 Mar;10(2):326–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb05972.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Midei M. G., Baughman K. L., Achuff S. C., Walford G. D., Baumgartner W., Brinker J. A. Is atrial activation beneficial in heart transplant recipients? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Nov;16(5):1201–1204. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90553-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Payne M. E., Murray K. D., Watson K. M., Galbraith T. A., Horwanitz E. P., Starling R. C., Myerowitz P. D. Permanent pacing in heart transplant recipients: underlying causes and long-term results. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991 Sep-Oct;10(5 Pt 1):738–742. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Perrins E. J., Morley C. A., Chan S. L., Sutton R. Randomised controlled trial of physiological and ventricular pacing. Br Heart J. 1983 Aug;50(2):112–117. doi: 10.1136/hrt.50.2.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pope S. E., Stinson E. B., Daughters G. T., 2nd, Schroeder J. S., Ingels N. B., Jr, Alderman E. L. Exercise response of the denervated heart in long-term cardiac transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol. 1980 Aug;46(2):213–218. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scott C. D., Omar I., McComb J. M., Dark J. H., Bexton R. S. Long-term pacing in heart transplant recipients is usually unnecessary. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Nov;14(11 Pt 2):1792–1796. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES