Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2023 May 30;24(11):9518. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119518

Transcriptome Revealed the Macrophages Inflammatory Response Mechanism and NOD-like Receptor Characterization in Siberian Sturgeon (Acipenser baerii)

Defang Chen 1,, Yinqiu Chen 1,, Lu Lu 1, Hao Zhu 1, Xin Zhang 1, Xiaoli Huang 1, Zhiqiong Li 1, Ping Ouyang 2, Xiaoli Zhang 3, Liangyu Li 3, Yi Geng 2,*
Editor: Kiyoshi Naruse
PMCID: PMC10253273  PMID: 37298469

Abstract

Nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain-like receptors (NOD-like receptors, NLRs) can regulate the inflammatory response to eliminate pathogens and maintain the host’s homeostasis. In this study, the head kidney macrophages of Siberian sturgeon were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce inflammation by evaluating the expression of cytokines. The high-throughput sequencing for macrophages after 12 h treatment showed that 1224 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 779 upregulated and 445 downregulated, were identified. DEGs mainly focus on pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and the adaptor proteins, cytokines, and cell adhesion molecules. In the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, multiple NOD-like receptor family CARD domains containing 3-like (NLRC3-like) were significantly downregulated, and pro-inflammatory cytokines were upregulated. Based on the transcriptome database, 19 NLRs with NACHT structural domains were mined and named in Siberian sturgeon, including 5 NLR-A, 12 NLR-C, and 2 other NLRs. The NLR-C subfamily had the characteristics of expansion of the teleost NLRC3 family and lacked the B30.2 domain compared with other fish. This study revealed the inflammatory response mechanism and NLRs family characterization in Siberian sturgeon by transcriptome and provided basic data for further research on inflammation in teleost.

Keywords: Acipenser baerii, LPS, transcriptome, inflammatory response, cytokines, NOD-like receptor

1. Introduction

Inflammation plays an essential role in disease response, courses of disease development, and excessive inflammation detrimental to the host homeostasis of vertebrates [1]. After microorganisms infection, macrophages and granulocytes can enhance respiratory bursts and promote the release of active oxygen and nitrogen ions; they have been considered the core cells of the inflammatory response [2]. The macrophages of the host can activate nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) to promote the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) after pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize pathogens or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [3]. The cytokines improve the host’s immune ability, eliminate pathogens, and up-regulate the anti-infection function by activating the different lymphocytes [4]. Therefore, inflammatory response mediated by PRRs plays an essential role in maintaining homeostasis.

Nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain-like receptors (NOD-like receptors, NLRs) are one of the most essential PRRs located in the cytoplasm [5]. NLRs have the conserved nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain (NACHT) structures from insects to mammals, and the R proteins with similar domains are also found in plants [6,7]. A previous study showed that NLRs play a critical role in innate immunity by recognizing ligands and mediating inflammatory response [8]. So far, a total of 22 NLRs have been identified in humans (Homo sapiens), including CIITA of the NLR-A subfamily, NAIP of the NLR-B subfamily, NOD1 (NLRC1), NOD2 (NLRC2), NLRC3, NLRC4, NLRC5, and NLRX of the NLR-C subfamily, and NLRP1-NLRP14 of the NLRP subfamily [9]. Compared with mammals, the NLRs of teleost are polymorphism due to chromosome replication events. The NLRC3 has many expansions whose structure possessed PYD, CARD, FISNA, and B30.2 domains or missing the LRRs domain [10]. Therefore, the naming method for NLRs of mammals is not applicable in lower vertebrates.

In recent years, based on the genome and transcriptome database, NLRs of teleost have been reported in zebrafish (Danio rerio) [11], channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) [12], miiuy croaker (Miichthys miiuy) [13], grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon Idella) [14], black rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli) [15], Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) [16], and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) [17]. Piscine NLRs were classified into four subfamilies, NLR-A, NLR-B, NLR-C, and other NLRs. The NLR-A includes the mammalian NLR-A subfamily (CIITA) and NLR-C subfamily (NOD1, NOD2, and NLRC5). NLR-B subfamily include NLR-B1, NLR-B2, NLR-B3, NLR-B4, and NLR-B5. NLR-C subfamily has the largest number of genes, including NLRC3 and NLRC3-like with gene expansion. Other NLRs include the genes such as NLRX, APAF, NWD1, and NWD2 [17]. However, there are some differences in the naming of different species. The NLRs with the B30.2 domain in grass carp were named NLR-B30.2, and NLRX was classified as an NLR-A subfamily [14]. All NLRs of the Chinese tongue sole containing the FISNA domain were named NLR-C, and NOD3/NLRC3 and NOD5/NLRX1 belong to the NLR-A subfamily [16]. Unlike the Teleostei, the Acipenseriformes are independent at the early stage of differentiation of the Scleroichthys. The NLRs genes of sturgeon have only been slightly annotated in the database, while the studies on identification, function, and mechanism are scarce [18]. Therefore, exploring the structure of NLRs in Acipenseriformes provide an important reference for understanding the origin and evolution of innate immunity.

This study used the macrophages of Siberian sturgeon to explore the inflammatory response mechanism by measuring cytokines and transcriptome sequencing after LPS treatment. The NLRs of the sturgeon were analyzed with phylogenetic trees constructed and the structure domain predicted. This study enriches the insight into the function of innate immunity in vertebrates and provides the regulator target in the inflammatory response in sturgeon.

2. Results

2.1. The Expression of Cytokines after LPS Treatment

After LPS treatment of macrophages, the results showed that the mRNA expression of IL-1β was significantly upregulated at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, and the highest expression level at 12 h was 110.40 times that of the control. The relative expression level of TNF-α was significantly upregulated at 12 h, which was 3.57 times higher than the control group. Compared with PBS treatment, the relative expression levels of IL-8 and TGF-β were significantly upregulated at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h with a gradually decreasing trend (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Inflammatory cytokines expression after LPS treatment in head kidney macrophages. (AD) Relative expression level of IL-1β (A), TNF-α (B), IL-8 (C) and TGF-β (D) at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. * indicates significant difference.

2.2. Raw Sequence and De Novo Assembly

After de novo assembly, the clean reads were 45,822,444, 43,771,700, 41,679,648, and 42,727,782 in the PBS group and 40,638,064, 42,547,796, 41,011,368, and 52,064,962 in the LPS group, respectively. The amounts of clean reads in different groups are shown in Table 1. The clean reads were retained with Q30 > 93.8%, and the error rate was <0.0255%. The data were of high quality and could be used for the subsequent annotation analysis.

Table 1.

Quality control of the sequence.

Sample Raw Reads Clean Reads Clean Bases Error Rate (%) Q30 (%) GC Content (%)
PBS_1 46,677,332 45,822,444 6.35 G 0.0255 93.80 46.64
PBS_2 44,472,856 43,771,700 6.06 G 0.0253 93.93 48.97
PBS_3 42,289,914 41,679,648 5.75 G 0.0253 93.97 47.31
PBS_4 43,448,798 42,727,782 6.32 G 0.0255 93.82 26.9
LPS_1 41,257,692 40,638,064 5.61 G 0.0251 94.22 47.36
LPS_2 43,363,986 42,547,796 6.30 G 0.0254 93.87 49.02
LPS_3 41,645,024 41,011,368 5.67 G 0.025 94.28 48.53
LPS_4 52,862,782 52,064,962 7.16 G 0.0251 94.20 47.94

2.3. Functional Annotation

Compared with different databases, the results showed that 34,484 (96.68%) unigenes have annotated in at least one database (Figure 2). Moreover, 34,336 (96.27%), 32,495 (91.10%), 32,148 (90.13%), 30,373 (85.15%), 28,060 (78.67%), and 24,675 (69.18%) were annotated in NR, COG, Swiss-prot, Pfam, GO, and KEGG, respectively (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Upset of unigenes annotations. The horizontal bar chart on the left represents the statistics of gene expression quantities annotated in six different databases. In the right chart, a single point represents the annotated genes in the database, and the lines between points represent the intersection of different databases. The vertical bar chart represents the number of genes in the corresponding database, respectively.

Table 2.

Summary of the annotations of unigenes.

Database Unigenes Percentage (%)
GO 28,060 78.67
KEGG 24,675 69.18
COG 32,495 91.10
NR 34,336 96.27
Swiss-Prot 32,148 90.13
Pfam 30,373 85.15
Total annotation 34,484 96.68
Total unigenes 35,668 100

2.4. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Identification of DEGs

The PCA showed that the PBS and LPS groups were divided into two clusters. Between the PBS and LPS treatment, 1224 unigenes were differentially expressed after LPS treatment macrophages of Siberian sturgeon, including 779 upregulated unigenes and 445 downregulated unigenes (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Analysis of principal component analysis and differentially expressed genes. (A) Analysis of principal component analysis. The horizontal axis represents the contribution of PC1 to distinguishing samples, while the vertical axis represents the contribution of PC2 to distinguishing samples. (B) Analysis of differentially expressed genes. The red dot represents significantly upregulated genes, the blue dot represents significantly downregulated genes, and the gray dot represents non-significantly differentially expressed genes. (C) Quantification of B-graph results.

2.5. GO and KEGG Enrichment Analysis

GO database enrichment analysis showed that DEGs were mainly enriched in biological processes, including the negative regulation of the interleukin-1-mediated signaling pathway, chemokine-mediated signaling pathway, cellular response to lipopolysaccharide, granulocyte activation, cellular response to molecule of bacterial origin, and response to lipopolysaccharide. The rich factor of negative regulation of the interleukin-1-mediated signaling pathway was 0.6, followed by the regulation of the interleukin-1-mediated signaling pathway and the chemokine-mediated signaling pathway, which were 0.55 and 0.43, respectively (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Gene function enrichment analysis in GO database. The y axis is the GO term, and the x axis represents the significance level of enrichment, which corresponds to the height of the column.

After LPS treatment, the results of KEGG enrichment showed that the signaling pathway related to cytokines production was significantly enriched, including the IL-17 signal pathway, cytokine receptor interaction, NF-κB signal pathway, and TNF signal pathway. In addition, PRRs-related pathways were also enriched, such as the Toll-like receptor signal pathway, NOD-like receptor signal pathway, and RIG-I-like receptor signal pathway (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Gene function enrichment analysis in KEGG signaling pathway. KEGG pathway enrichment classification, the x axis is the rich factor, which means the ratio of the sample number to the background number, and the y axis is the name of the pathway.

2.6. The Analysis of the NOD-like Receptor Signaling Pathway

Based on the NR annotation and KEGG enrichment analysis, a total of 58 genes of NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, including tumor necrosis factor family, interleukin, chemokine, and chemokine receptor, PRRs, and adaptor protein, nuclear transcription factor, and caspases (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The heatmap of DEGs related to NOD-like receptor signaling pathway in Siberian sturgeon macrophages. The red and blue colors represent up- and downregulated in the PBS and LPS groups, respectively.

2.7. The Analysis of Sturgeon NLR

According to the analysis of the genome database of sterlet and paddlefish, a total of 35 NLRs could encode a conservative NACHT domain. Based on the classification of fish NLRs, they were divided into three subfamilies, namely NLR-A, NLR-C, and other NLRs. NLR-A includes 8 genes including NOD1-1, NOD1-2, NOD2, CIITA-1, CIITA-2, NLRC4, NLRC5-1, and NLRC5-2, NLR-C includes 22 genes, including NLRC3-1, NLRC3-2, NLRC3-3 to NLRC3-22, and other NLRs include 5 genes, including NLRX1-1, NLRX-2, NWD1-1, NWD1-2, and NWD2. The results of the phylogenetic tree showed that the relationship between NOD1, NOD2, CIITA, and NLRC5 of different species was relatively close (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Phylogenetic tree of NLRs genes from sterlet, paddlefish, and Siberian sturgeon.

To obtain the NLRs sequence of Siberian sturgeon, the transcriptome database of Siberian sturgeon was constructed based on TBtools. The NLRs sequences of sterlet and paddlefish were compared one by one, and the sequences with the highest homology were obtained for phylogenetic tree analysis. The results showed that there were 19 NLRs in Siberian sturgeon, including 5 NLR-A family members, namely AbNOD1, AbNOD2, AbCIITA, AbNLRC4, and AbNLRC5. A total of 12 NLR-C family members, including AbNLRC3-1, AbNLRC3-3, AbNLRC3-4, AbNLRC3-6, AbNLRC3-7, AbNLRC3-8, AbNLRC3-11, AbNLRC3-12, AbNLRC3-13, AbNLRC3-16, AbNLRC3-18, and AbNLRC3-19, as well as 2 other NLR family members, AbNLRX and AbNWD2 (Figure 7).

SMART prediction showed that AbNOD1, AbNOD2, and AbNLRC4 of the NLR-A family had the conservative CARD-NACHT-LRRs domain type. AbCIITA only had the NACHT and no LRRs. AbNLRC5 was AAA-LRRs, similar to the sterlet and paddlefish. There were 12 NLR-C family genes in Siberian sturgeon, which have the characteristics of expansion of NLRC3 in teleost. AbNLRC3-1, AbNLRC3-18, and AbNLRC3-19 were NACHT-LRRs types. The effect domains of AbNLRC3-3, AbNLRC3-4, AbNLRC3-6, and AbNLRC3-11 were CARD, and the effect domains of AbNLRC3-7, AbNLRC3-8, AbNLRC3-13, and AbNLRC3-16 were PYRIN (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

NLRs domain prediction of Siberian sturgeon.

3. Discussion

LPS is the PAMPs of Gram-negative bacteria and causes host inflammatory response, which has been widely used in the construction of inflammatory models and related immunology research. In this study, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-8, and TGF-β were significantly induced at 12 h after LPS treatment, indicating that LPS stimulated the inflammatory response of macrophages of Siberian sturgeon. In bony fish, IL-1β, IL-6, CCL2, and TNF-α were significantly upregulated in the head kidney macrophages of large yellow coraker (Pseudosciaena crocea) [19] and grass carp [20,21] after LPS treatment in vitro, respectively. Transcriptome can reveal the transcription of mRNA expression level and has been widely used to research the mechanism of cancer [22], genetic disease [23], pathogen infection [24], and stress [25] of the host. To further explore the mechanism of the LPS-induced inflammatory response of Siberian sturgeon, the macrophages was analyzed at 12 h by transcriptome sequencing. Through the identification of DEGs and functional enrichment analysis, the results showed that inflammation-related pathways were significantly enriched, such as the Toll-like receptor signal pathway, NOD-like receptor signal pathway, chemokine–chemokine receptor interaction, and NF-κB signal pathway. Consistent with this study, after intraperitoneal injection of LPS from Aeromonas hydrophila or Escherichia coli, the transcriptome of the spleen showed that the KEGG signal pathway was enriched in Toll-like receptor signal pathway, NOD-like receptor signal pathway, and chemokine–chemokine receptor interaction [26]. Therefore, LPS can activate the host inflammatory response by inducing the expression of cytokines in the macrophages of Siberian sturgeon.

PRRs are an essential part of the innate immune system to resist the infection of pathogens by recognizing the PAMPs and mediating the immune response to eliminate the pathogen [27]. The PRRs of TLRs [28], NLRs [29], RLRs [30], DNA sensors [31], and CLRs [32] of teleost have been widely studied in function and mechanism in response to pathogens. Different from mammals, NLRs of low vertebrates show a greatly amplified by molecular biology and phylogenetic analysis with the domains of PYRIN, CARD, FISNA, LRRs, or B30.2 [10]. In the Cyclostomata, lamprey (Lampetra japonicum), as the representative species of jawless vertebrates only had 2 NLR-A (NODa and NODb) and 7 NLR-C (NLRC3a-NLRC3g) identified in the genome without PYD, and further analysis speculated that the non-CARD NODa and NODb were the common ancestors of the jawless vertebrates NOD1 and NOD2 [33]. NLRs in the purple sea urchin (Heliocidaris erythogama) had expanded to an extensive family with 203 NLRs identified. The structure of most NLR proteins was composed of the N-terminal CARD, central NACHT domain, and C-terminal LRRs [34]. In the bony fish, NLRs were also expanded with species-specific. A total of 65 and 29 NLRs with highly conserved NACHT were identified in grass carp and turbot, respectively [14,17]. A total of 23 NLRs were identified in black rockfish, including conserved NOD1, NOD2, NLRC5, and NLRX1, and 15 NLRC3 with gene expansion without PYD or B30.2 [15]. In the present study, the NLRs analysis of Siberian sturgeon shows the specific NLRC4 gene, two isoforms of NOD1 and without containing the B30.2 domain compared with other fish, which also suggests that the sturgeon is different from the Teleostei. The previous study showed that the sturgeon is one of the oldest and earliest vertebrates based on molecular analysis, and the sturgeon had a strong disease resistance after bacterial infection [18]. This study indicated that the unique NLRs may participate in the innate immune defense.

In this study, the multiple NLRC3-like were significantly downregulated after LPS treatment. A previous study confirmed that NLRC3 of mammals belonged to the negative regulatory NLR on inflammation. The protein structure consists of the typical domain of the NACHT and LRRs, and without the effector domain in N-terminal [35]. In mammals, NLRC3 attenuated Lys63 (K63)-linked ubiquitination of TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and inhibited the activation of the NF-κB [35,36]. However, NLRC3 of teleost has been proven to have a different function in regulating the inflammatory response because of the NLRC3 gene expansion [10]. In flounder, RNA interference with NLRC3 (FISNA-NACHT-LRR-B30.2) downregulated the expression of LPS-induced IL-1β, IL-8, and TNF-α. A study on Nile tilapia showed that the NF-κB signaling pathway was activated after overexpression of NLRC3 (CARD-NACHT-LRR). On the contrary, zebrafish NLRC3-like 1 (FISNA-NACHT-LRR) played a negative role in inflammatory regulation by targeting the RIPK2 and inhibiting the recruitment of NOD1-RIPK2 [10]. NLRC3-like (PYD-NACHT)-deficient zebrafish induced the expression of pro-inflammatory IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-12 [37].

In conclusion, LPS induced inflammatory response in the macrophages of Siberian sturgeon at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. Transcriptome sequence showed that DEGs significantly enriched in NOD-like receptor signaling pathway with pro-inflammatory cytokines up-regulation and multiple NLRC3-like down-regulation. Further study found that a total of 19 NLRs consisting of NLR-A, NLR-C, and other NLRs were mined from the transcriptome database of Siberian sturgeon, which lacked the PYD and B30.2. This study indicates that NLRC3-like is involved in the inflammatory response and provides the target to maintain host homeostasis when infected with bacteria.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Fish

The Siberian sturgeon (2.74 ± 0.53 kg) were purchased from Runzhao Fisheries Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). For a temporary period of two weeks, the fish were kept at 19.3 ± 0.2 °C and fed with a ratio of 2% of the total weight of commercial food at 9:00 and 16:00. The pH of aerated water was 7.3 ± 0.4, the concentrations of NH3 were less than 0.04 mg/L, and the dissolved oxygen was over 6.0 mg/L. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University.

4.2. Head Kidney Macrophages Culture and LPS Treatment

Head kidney macrophages culture was prepared as described by Zhu with modifications [38]. After the Siberian sturgeon were anesthetized with MS-222, the head kidney tissue was quickly dissected and placed into medium 1 on the ice. The 100-mesh cell sieve filtration was used to obtain the cell. Then, the cell suspension was added to 51% percoll, 400× g, at 4 °C, and centrifuged for 30 min. Moreover, the cells in the middle white layer were collected and counted. The cells were divided into the 24-well plate to incubate for 8 h, then added LPS solution to achieve 25 μg/mL and PBS as control. After 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, the macrophages were collected.

4.3. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from macrophages by RNAiso Plus (Takara, Dalian, China), and the cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA with the PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Dalian, China). A. baerii-specific β-actin and GAPDH primers served as the internal control to normalize the cDNA quantity for the sample. qRT-PCR of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-8, and TGF-β was performed in a fluorescent quantitative instrument (Bio-Rad) by using the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (Takara, Dalian, China) in different times. Genes name, primers information, and product of qRT-PCR are listed in Table 3. The data were calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method (2−ΔΔCT).

Table 3.

Genes name, primers information, and product of qRT-PCR.

Gene Name Primer Sequence (5′-3′) Actual Tm (°C) Product (bp)
IL-1β-F TGATGAACGAGCTGGATGGG 57.1 114
IL-1β-R GCTGGGTCTGCGGTATGTAG
TNF-α-F TCGCCGGACTTCACAATAGG 58.9 114
TNF-α-R GCTTGCTCGCCAGTTGTTTT
IL-8-F GGTGCAAATTCTCCCAGCAAA 61.4 107
IL-8-R AACTCCACTCCCAAAGGAGC
TGF-β-F ATTCAGAACTATAAGACCCCCC 63.3 161
TGF-β-R CGGAAGTCAATGTAAAGAGGC
β-actin-F GTTGGTATGGGACAGAAGGACA 61.4 105
β-actin-R CCAGTTGGTAACAATGCCGT
GADPH-F TGTGGGCATCAATGGATTTGG 60.5 119
GADPH-R ACACCATGTATTCCGGGTCAAT

4.4. RNA Isolation, mRNA Library Construction, and Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from macrophages, and the concentration and purity of the RNA were detected by Nanodrop 2000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). RNA integrity was detected by agar-gel electrophoresis and Agilent 2100 (Agilent, Beijing, China). Only high-quality RNA samples were used to construct the sequencing library.

The messenger RNA was isolated according to the polyA selection method by oligo (dT) beads and then fragmented by fragmentation buffer. Then, the double-stranded cDNA was synthesized using a SuperScript double-stranded cDNA synthesis kit with random hexamer primers. The synthesized cDNA was subjected to end-repair, phosphorylation, and ‘A’ base addition according to Illumina’s library construction protocol. Libraries were size selected for cDNA target fragments of 300 bp on 2% Low Range Ultra Agarose followed by PCR amplified for 15 PCR cycles. At last, the paired-end RNA-seq sequencing library was sequenced with the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencer.

4.5. Transcriptome Processing and Assembly

The sequencing service was provided by Majorbio (Majorbio, Shanghai, China). The fastp (https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp) (accessed on 9 November 2018) was used to perform the quality control for the raw paired-end reads. Then, the clean reads were separately aligned to the sterlet reference genome (GCF_010645085.1) with the HISAT2 (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/hisat2/index.shtml) (accessed on 6 August 2017). The StringTie (https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/stringtie/) (accessed on 21 April 2020) was used to map and assemble the reads of each sample.

4.6. Gene Annotation and Classification

The assembled transcriptome sequences were compared with six databases to obtain the annotation information: NCBI nonredundant (NR, https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/) (accessed on 24 August 2020), Swiss-Prot (http://web.expasy.org/docs/swiss-prot_guideline.html) (accessed on 8 December 2019), Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/) (accessed on 27 September 2018), Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/) (accessed on 25 November 2020), Gene Ontology (GO, http://www.geneontology.org) (accessed on 28 June 2020) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) (accessed on 1 July 2020).

4.7. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) and Enrichment Analysis

RSEM (http://deweylab.biostat.wisc.edu/rsem/) (accessed on 14 February 2020) was used to quantify gene abundances, and the transcriptome and assembly results were compared. Differential expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2, and the unigenes with the |log2FC| ≥ 1 and p adjust <0.05 were defined as DEGs. GO functional enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis were performed by Goatools and KOBAS, respectively.

4.8. NLR Scan and Analysis

The local database of the genome of sterlet and paddlefish was constructed. The sequence containing the NACHT motif (PF05729.15) was obtained from Pfam, and all E-value < 10−10 genes were obtained by HMMER 3.0. After removing the variable clipping, the longest sequence was used for subsequent analysis. The local BLAST database of Siberian sturgeon transcriptome was constructed, and the NLRs of Siberian sturgeon were obtained by comparing the NLRs sequences of sterlet and paddlefish one by one. MEGA-11 was used for NLRs sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree construction. The Interactive Tree of Life (ITOL, https://itol.embl.de/) (accessed on 22 April 2021) was used for the visual process.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All experimental data were expressed as mean ± standard error (mean ± SEM). The results were analyzed by SPSS 27.0 and graphed by GraphPad Prism 8.0. Statistical analysis was performed using a t-test. p values < 0.05 indicated significance.

Author Contributions

D.C.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Resources, Visualization, Writing—review and editing. Y.C.: Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing—original draft. L.L. (Lu Lu) and H.Z.: Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation. X.Z. (Xin Zhang) and Z.L.: Methodology, Data curation, Software. X.H., P.O. and X.Z. (Xiaoli Zhang): Formal analysis, Visualizations, Resources. L.L. (Liangyu Li): Funding acquisition, Writing—review and editing. Y.G.: Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study conformed to the guidance of ethical animal treatment for the care and use of experimental animals. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Sichuan Natural Science Foundation (no. 2022NSFSC1662) and Key Research Support Plan (no. 2022-YF09-00040-SN).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Arulselvan P., Fard M.T., Tan W.S., Gothai S., Fakurazi S., Norhaizan M.E., Kumar S.S. Role of Antioxidants and Natural Products in Inflammation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016;2016:5276130. doi: 10.1155/2016/5276130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Verburg-van Kemenade B.M., Ribeiro C.M., Chadzinska M. Neuroendocrine-immune interaction in fish: Differential regulation of phagocyte activity by neuroendocrine factors. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2011;172:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen L., Cao S.Q., Lin Z.M., He S.J., Zuo J.P. NOD-like receptors in autoimmune diseases. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021;42:1742–1756. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-00603-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hayden M.S., Ghosh S. NF-κB in immunobiology. Cell Res. 2011;21:223–244. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kaparakis M., Philpott D.J., Ferrero R.L. Mammalian NLR proteins; discriminating foe from friend. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2007;85:495–502. doi: 10.1038/sj.icb.7100105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Robertson S.J., Rubino S.J., Geddes K., Philpott D.J. Examining host-microbial interactions through the lens of NOD: From plants to mammals. Semin. Immunol. 2012;24:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sahoo B.R. Structure of fish Toll-like receptors (TLR) and NOD-like receptors (NLR) Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;161:1602–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ting J.P., Lovering R.C., Alnemri E.S., Bertin J., Boss J.M., Davis B.K., Flavell R.A., Girardin S.E., Godzik A., Harton J.A., et al. The NLR gene family: A standard nomenclature. Immunity. 2008;28:285–287. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim Y.K., Shin J.S., Nahm M.H. NOD-Like Receptors in Infection, Immunity, and Diseases. Yonsei Med. J. 2016;57:5–14. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chang M.X., Xiong F., Wu X.M., Hu Y.W. The expanding and function of NLRC3 or NLRC3-like in teleost fish: Recent advances and novel insights. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2021;114:103859. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2020.103859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Howe K., Schiffer P.H., Zielinski J., Wiehe T., Laird G.K., Marioni J.C., Soylemez O., Kondrashov F., Leptin M. Structure and evolutionary history of a large family of NLR proteins in the zebrafish. Open Biol. 2016;6:160009. doi: 10.1098/rsob.160009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rajendran K.V., Zhang J., Liu S., Kucuktas H., Wang X., Liu H., Sha Z., Terhune J., Peatman E., Liu Z. Pathogen recognition receptors in channel catfish: I. Identification, phylogeny and expression of NOD-like receptors. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2012;37:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2011.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li J., Chu Q., Xu T. A genome-wide survey of expansive NLR-C subfamily in miiuy croaker and characterization of the NLR-B30.2 genes. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016;61:116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2016.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xu T., Liao Z., Su J. Pattern recognition receptors in grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella: II. Organization and expression analysis of NOD-like receptors. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020;110:103734. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2020.103734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cao M., Yan X., Li Q., Fu Q., Yang N., Song L., Li C. Genome-wide identification and analysis of NOD-like receptors and their potential roles in response to Edwardsiella tarda infection in black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii) Aquaculture. 2021;541:736803. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen Z., Xu X., Wang J., Zhou Q., Chen S. A genome-wide survey of NOD-like receptors in Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis): Identification, characterization and expression analysis in response to bacterial infection. J. Fish Biol. 2021;99:1786–1797. doi: 10.1111/jfb.14871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang L., Cao M., Li Q., Yan X., Xue T., Song L., Su B., Li C. Genome-wide identification of NOD-like receptors and their expression profiling in mucosal tissues of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) upon bacteria challenge. Mol. Immunol. 2021;134:48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu J., Lu L., Liu L., Chen D., Yang F., Geng Y., Li Z., Huang X., Ouyang P., Wang J., et al. Genomic structure and molecular characterization of NLRC3-like from Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) and expression response to Streptococcus iniae and pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Fish Shellfish Immunol. Rep. 2021;2:100042. doi: 10.1016/j.fsirep.2021.100042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Q., Cui K., Wu M., Xu D., Mai K., Ai Q. Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Influence LPS-Induced Inflammation of Fish Macrophages through Differential Modulation of Pathogen Recognition and p38 MAPK/NF-κB Signaling. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:559332. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.559332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hu Y., Wei X., Liao Z., Gao Y., Liu X., Su J., Yuan G. Transcriptome Analysis Provides Insights into the Markers of Resting and LPS-Activated Macrophages in Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:3562. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li P., Ye J., Zeng S., Yang C. Florfenicol alleviated lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory responses in Ctenopharyngodon idella through inhibiting toll/NF-κB signaling pathways. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;94:479–484. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.08.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao E.Y., Jones M., Jones S.J.M. Whole-Genome Sequencing in Cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2019;9:a034579. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a034579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saeidian A.H., Youssefian L., Vahidnezhad H., Uitto J. Research Techniques Made Simple: Whole-Transcriptome Sequencing by RNA-Seq for Diagnosis of Monogenic Disorders. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2020;140:1117–1126.e1111. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Westermann A.J., Vogel J. Cross-species RNA-seq for deciphering host-microbe interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021;22:361–378. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00326-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang Z., Fu Y., Shen F., Zhang Z., Guo H., Zhang X. Barren environment damages cognitive abilities in fish: Behavioral and transcriptome mechanisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;794:148805. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li Y., Xia P., Wu J., Huang A., Bu G., Meng F., Kong F., Cao X., Han X., Yu G., et al. The potential sensing molecules and signal cascades for protecting teleost fishes against lipopolysaccharide. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020;97:235–247. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.12.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lu Y., Su F., Li Q., Zhang J., Li Y., Tang T., Hu Q., Yu X.Q. Pattern recognition receptors in Drosophila immune responses. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020;102:103468. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2019.103468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Palti Y. Toll-like receptors in bony fish: From genomics to function. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2011;35:1263–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang L., Gao Z., Yu L., Zhang B., Wang J., Zhou J. Nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors in teleost fish: Current knowledge and future perspectives. J. Fish Dis. 2018;41:1317–1330. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chang M.X. The negative regulation of retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs) signaling pathway in fish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2021;119:104038. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2021.104038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mojzesz M., Rakus K., Chadzinska M., Nakagami K., Biswas G., Sakai M., Hikima J.I. Cytosolic Sensors for Pathogenic Viral and Bacterial Nucleic Acids in Fish. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:7289. doi: 10.3390/ijms21197289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Petit J., Bailey E.C., Wheeler R.T., de Oliveira C.A.F., Forlenza M., Wiegertjes G.F. Studies Into β-Glucan Recognition in Fish Suggests a Key Role for the C-Type Lectin Pathway. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:280. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hui F., Guo S., Liu J., Li M., Geng M., Xia Y., Liu X., Li Q., Li J., Zhu T. Genome-wide identification and characterization of NLR genes in lamprey (Lethenteron reissneri) and their responses to lipopolysaccharide/poly(I:C) challenge. Mol. Immunol. 2022;143:122–134. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2022.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hibino T., Loza-Coll M., Messier C., Majeske A.J., Cohen A.H., Terwilliger D.P., Buckley K.M., Brockton V., Nair S.V., Berney K., et al. The immune gene repertoire encoded in the purple sea urchin genome. Dev. Biol. 2006;300:349–365. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schneider M., Zimmermann A.G., Roberts R.A., Zhang L., Swanson K.V., Wen H., Davis B.K., Allen I.C., Holl E.K., Ye Z., et al. The innate immune sensor NLRC3 attenuates Toll-like receptor signaling via modification of the signaling adaptor TRAF6 and transcription factor NF-κB. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:823–831. doi: 10.1038/ni.2378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li Z.-T., Liu H., Zhang W.-Q. NLRC3 alleviates hypoxia/reoxygenation induced inflammation in RAW264.7 cells by inhibiting K63-linked ubiquitination of TRAF6. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2020;19:455–460. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shiau C.E., Monk K.R., Joo W., Talbot W.S. An anti-inflammatory NOD-like receptor is required for microglia development. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1342–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhu J., Wang H., Wang J., Wang X., Peng S., Geng Y., Wang K., Ouyang P., Li Z., Huang X., et al. Identification and characterization of a β-defensin gene involved in the immune defense response of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Mol. Immunol. 2017;85:256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES