Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1993 Dec;70(6):507–512. doi: 10.1136/hrt.70.6.507

Rate of change of left ventricular ejection fraction during exercise is superior to the peak ejection fraction for predicting functionally significant coronary artery disease.

B S Sridhara 1, S Bhattacharya 1, X J Liu 1, P Broadhurst 1, A Lahiri 1
PMCID: PMC1025380  PMID: 8280514

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To detect and characterise rapid temporal changes in the left ventricular response to exercise in patients with ischaemic heart disease and to relate these changes to the functional severity of coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND--The gamma camera does not allow the detection of rapid changes in cardiac function during exercise radionuclide ventriculography, the monitoring of which may improve the assessment of patients with ischaemic heart disease. METHODS--A miniature nuclear probe (Cardioscint) was used to monitor continuously left ventricular function during exercise in 31 patients who had coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease. A coronary angiographic jeopardy score was calculated for each patient. RESULTS--The coronary jeopardy score ranged from 0 to 12 (median 4). Ejection fraction fell significantly during exercise from 46% to 34%. Patients were divided into two groups based on the response of their ejection fraction to exercise. In 14 patients (group I), the peak change in ejection fraction coincided with the end of exercise, whereas in the other 17 patients (group II) the peak change in ejection fraction occurred before the end of exercise, resulting in a brief plateau. The peak change in ejection fraction and the time to its occurrence were independent predictors of coronary jeopardy (r = -0.59, p < 0.001 for peak change and r = -0.69, p < 0.001 for time to that change). The rate of change in ejection fraction was the strongest predictor of coronary jeopardy (r = -0.81, p < 0.001). In group I the peak change in ejection fraction was a poor predictor severity of coronary disease (r = -0.28, NS), whereas the time to peak and the rate of change in ejection fraction were good predictors (r = -0.65 and r = -0.73, p < 0.01). In group II the peak, the time to the peak, and the rate of change in ejection fraction were good predictors of coronary jeopardy (r = -0.75, r = -0.61, and r = -0.83, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION--The rate of change of ejection fraction during exercise can be assessed by continuous monitoring of left ventricular function with the nuclear probe, and is the best predictor of functionally significant coronary artery disease.

Full text

PDF
507

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bairey C. N., de Yang L., Berman D. S., Rozanski A. Comparison of physiologic ejection fraction responses to activities of daily living: implications for clinical testing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Oct;16(4):847–854. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80332-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger H. J., Reduto L. A., Johnstone D. E., Borkowski H., Sands J. M., Cohen L. S., Langou R. A., Gottschalk A., Zaret B. L., Pytlik L. Global and regional left ventricular response to bicycle exercise in coronary artery disease. Assessment by quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography. Am J Med. 1979 Jan;66(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(79)90476-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonow R. O. Prognostic implications of exercise radionuclide angiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 1988 Jun;63(6):630–634. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)64895-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borer J. S., Bacharach S. L., Green M. V., Kent K. M., Epstein S. E., Johnston G. S. Real-time radionuclide cineangiography in the noninvasive evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function at rest and during exercise in patients with coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1977 Apr 14;296(15):839–844. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197704142961503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brady T. J., Thrall J. H., Lo K., Pitt B. The importance of adequate exercise in the detection of coronary heart disease by radionuclide ventriculography. J Nucl Med. 1980 Dec;21(12):1125–1130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breisblatt W. M., Schulman D. S., Follansbee W. P. Continuous on-line monitoring of left ventricular function with a new nonimaging detector:validation and clinical use in the evaluation of patients post angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1991 Jun;121(6 Pt 1):1609–1617. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90003-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Breisblatt W. M., Vita N. A., Armuchastegui M., Cohen L. S., Zaret B. L. Usefulness of serial radionuclide monitoring during graded nitroglycerin infusion for unstable angina pectoris for determining left ventricular function and individualized therapeutic dose. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Apr 1;61(10):685–690. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91049-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Broadhurst P., Cashman P., Crawley J., Raftery E., Lahiri A. Clinical validation of a miniature nuclear probe system for continuous on-line monitoring of cardiac function and ST-segment. J Nucl Med. 1991 Jan;32(1):37–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Califf R. M., Phillips H. R., 3rd, Hindman M. C., Mark D. B., Lee K. L., Behar V. S., Johnson R. A., Pryor D. B., Rosati R. A., Wagner G. S. Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 May;5(5):1055–1063. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caplin J. L., Dymond D. S., O'Keefe J. C., Flatman W. D., Dyke L., Banim S. O., Spurrell R. A. Relation between coronary anatomy and serial changes in left ventricular function on exercise: a study using first pass radionuclide angiography with gold-195m. Br Heart J. 1986 Feb;55(2):120–128. doi: 10.1136/hrt.55.2.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dymond D. S., Foster C., Grenier R. P., Carpenter J., Schmidt D. H. Peak exercise and immediate postexercise imaging for the detection of left ventricular functional abnormalities in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jun 1;53(11):1532–1537. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90574-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson R. A., Zir L. M., Harper R. W., Leinbach R. C., Hutter A. M., Jr, Pohost G. M., Block P. C., Gold H. K. Patterns of haemodynamic alteration during left ventricular ischaemia in man. Relation to angiographic extent of coronary artery disease. Br Heart J. 1979 Apr;41(4):441–451. doi: 10.1136/hrt.41.4.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones R. H., Floyd R. D., Austin E. H., Sabiston D. C., Jr The role of radionuclide angiocardiography in the preoperative prediction of pain relief and prolonged survival following coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Surg. 1983 Jun;197(6):743–754. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198306000-00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones R. H., McEwan P., Newman G. E., Port S., Rerych S. K., Scholz P. M., Upton M. T., Peter C. A., Austin E. H., Leong K. H. Accuracy of diagnosis of coronary artery disease by radionuclide management of left ventricular function during rest and exercise. Circulation. 1981 Sep;64(3):586–601. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.3.586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koike A., Itoh H., Doi M., Taniguchi K., Marumo F., Umehara I., Hiroe M. Beat-to-beat evaluation of cardiac function during recovery from upright bicycle exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 1990 Aug;120(2):316–323. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lahiri A., Bowles M. J., Jones R. I., Crawley J. C., Raftery E. B. Assessment of left ventricular function in coronary artery disease with the nuclear probe during intervention studies. Br Heart J. 1984 Oct;52(4):422–430. doi: 10.1136/hrt.52.4.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lahiri A., Crawley J. Nuclear probes in cardiology. J Nucl Med. 1992 Mar;33(3):448–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee K. L., Pryor D. B., Pieper K. S., Harrell F. E., Jr, Califf R. M., Mark D. B., Hlatky M. A., Coleman R. E., Cobb F. R., Jones R. H. Prognostic value of radionuclide angiography in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. A comparison with clinical and catheterization variables. Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5):1705–1717. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.5.1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rozanski A., Diamond G. A., Berman D., Forrester J. S., Morris D., Swan H. J. The declining specificity of exercise radionuclide ventriculography. N Engl J Med. 1983 Sep 1;309(9):518–522. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198309013090902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schneider R. M., Weintraub W. S., Klein L. W., Seelaus P. A., Katz R. I., Agarwal J. B., Helfant R. H. Multistage analysis of exercise radionuclide angiography in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jul 1;58(1):36–41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90237-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. de Yang L., Bairey C. N., Berman D. S., Nichols K. J., Odom-Maryon T., Rozanski A. Accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular ejection fraction measurements using an ambulatory radionuclide left ventricular function monitor. J Nucl Med. 1991 May;32(5):796–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES