Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2023 May 26;12(11):3689. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113689

Dapaglifozin on Albuminuria in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with FabrY Disease: The DEFY Study Design and Protocol

Yuri Battaglia 1,2,*, Francesca Bulighin 1,2, Luigi Zerbinati 3, Nicola Vitturi 4, Giacomo Marchi 5,6, Gianni Carraro 7
Editors: Charat Thongprayoon, Wisit Kaewput, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Jordi Bover
PMCID: PMC10253838  PMID: 37297884

Abstract

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare genetic disorder caused by a deficiency in the α-galactosidase A enzyme, which results in the globotriaosylceramide accumulation in many organs, including the kidneys. Nephropathy is a major FD complication that can progress to end-stage renal disease if not treated early. Although enzyme replacement therapy and chaperone therapy are effective, other treatments such as ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers can also provide nephroprotective effects when renal damage is also established. Recently, SGLT2 inhibitors have been approved as innovative drugs for treating chronic kidney disease. Thus, we plan a multicenter observational prospective cohort study to assess the effect of Dapagliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, in FD patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1–3. The objectives are to evaluate the effect of Dapagliflozin primarily on albuminuria and secondarily on kidney disease progression and clinical FD stability. Thirdly, any association between SGT2i and cardiac pathology, exercise capacity, kidney and inflammatory biomarkers, quality of life, and psychosocial factors will also be evaluated. The inclusion criteria are age ≥ 18; CKD stages 1–3; and albuminuria despite stable treatment with ERT/Migalastat and ACEi/ARB. The exclusion criteria are immunosuppressive therapy, type 1 diabetes, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and recurrent UTIs. Baseline, 12-month, and 24-month visits will be scheduled to collect demographic, clinical, biochemical, and urinary data. Additionally, an exercise capacity and psychosocial assessment will be performed. The study could provide new insights into using SGLT2 inhibitors for treating kidney manifestations in Fabry disease.

Keywords: SGLT2 inhibitors, nephropathy, chronic kidney disease, migalastat, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers

1. Introduction

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder characterized by a deficiency in the activity of lysosomal α-galactosidase-A. This genetic mutation leads to the accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) in various cell types, including endothelial, cardiac, renal, and neuronal cells, resulting in progressive damage to the renal, cardiac, and nervous system [1]. Kidney biopsies typically reveal Gb3 accumulation primarily in podocytes, mesangial cells, and tubular epithelial cells, with focal and global glomerulosclerosis usually starting in the second decade of life or even earlier in some cases [2,3]. It is worth noting that Gb3 accumulation alone is not solely responsible for the disease’s pathogenesis [4]. Inflammation and oxidative stress also contribute to organ damage, potentially explaining the suboptimal response of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in cases of late-disease diagnosis [5].

Clinically, three presentations of FD can be identified [1]. In hemizygous males with the classic form, the disease typically begins in childhood and presents with symptoms such as acroparesthesias, angiokeratomas, anhidrosis, cornea verticillate, and gastrointestinal disorders. Cardiac hypertrophy, arrhythmias, stroke, and chronic kidney disease usually appear later in life [6,7,8,9,10]. For heterozygous females, the clinical manifestations can vary widely, ranging from asymptomatic to mild or severe forms, and depend on the X-inactivation process. The FD later-onset form typically appears between the fourth and seventh decade of life and predominantly affects the heart or kidneys [11].

Nephropathy is a major FD complication, characterized by a reduced glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria. In the absence of a specific therapy, impaired renal function progressively worsens over time, leading to end-stage renal disease being reached around the fourth or fifth decade of life. Proteinuria is the primary predictor for renal progression in both men and women with FD [12]. Additionally, proteinuria is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and, therefore, is an important therapeutic target.

The FD treatment involves specific therapy, such as enzyme replacement therapy using Agalsidase alpha/Agalsidase beta and chaperone therapy using Migalastat [13], which are aimed at managing organ damage [14,15]. However, there have been debates and conflicting results regarding the effect of these specific FD therapies on proteinuria in FD patients with CKD. Specifically, the use of Agalsidase alpha did not show any anti-proteinuric effect, while the reduction in proteinuria across clinical trials with Agalsidase beta varied significantly [16]. Furthermore, preliminary studies indicate conflicting results regarding the reduction in proteinuria with Migalastat [17].

In addition to the above therapies, other drugs such as ACE inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) play a relevant nephroprotective role by reducing proteinuria and slowing the decline in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To achieve a nephroprotective effect, doses of ACEi/ARBs must be titrated to reduce proteinuria up to 0.5 g/24 h [18].

However, the use of ACEi or ARBs is limited due to the risk of hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury. Although a double blockade of ACEi and ARB demonstrated a greater antiproteinuric effect in patients with or without diabetes and with microalbuminuria or proteinuria, it is not recommended due to increased adverse events [19]. Furthermore, there is a lack of data available regarding the use of double blockade in Fabry nephropathy.

SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), initially introduced as hypoglycaemic drugs, have become increasingly popular in recent years for the treatment of CKD and heart failure, regardless of glycaemic control. These drugs act by inhibiting the sodium–glucose cotransporters channels present in the S1 tract of the proximal tubule, which are responsible for the majority of filtered glucose reabsorption. Several large randomized controlled trials showed the benefits of SGLT2i in both cardiac and renal function, not only in patients with diabetes but also in patients without diabetes [20]. Indeed, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure similarly in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertensive nephropathy, and glomerulonephritis. [21]. On the other hand, the results of two recent trials, such as EMPA-KIDNEY [22] and DELIVER [23], conducted in patients with or without diabetes mellitus have demonstrated that the use of SGLT2i reduced the risk of CKD progression (37%) and of acute kidney injury (AKI) onset (23%). These renal benefits were observed regardless of the underlying nephropathy or stage of glomerular filtrate rate [22]. An analysis of the DAPA-CKD trial [24] showed that dapagliflozin can significantly reduce albuminuria in CKD patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Consequently, SGLT2 inhibitors have been recently approved in CKD patients with proteinuria for the treatment of CKD progression [25].

SGLT2 inhibitors exert their nephroprotective effect through multiple mechanisms, including the re-establishment of glomerular tubular feedback, which protects against glomerular hyperfiltration damage. In depth, this involves the reduction in glucose and sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule leading to increased sodium transport at the macula densa, increased adenosine release, afferent arteriole vasoconstriction, and a reduction in intraglomerular pressure [26]. These effects could be added to those of ACEi/ARBs, which act at the level of the efferent arteriole, causing vasodilation.

In addition to these mechanisms, other factors can contribute to the nephroprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, including the reduction in blood pressure values, an increase in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, a decrease in uric acid levels, and a reduction in oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory mediators [27,28].

These benefits suggest a potential role for SGLT2i in FD patients with CKD as these drugs could target the FD pathogenetic mechanisms, such as oxidative stress and inflammation, which are not completely addressed by ERT or chaperon therapy alone. However, further investigations and well-designed clinical trials are needed to thoroughly assess the effects of SGLT2i on Fabry nephropathy [29].

2. Aim of Study

With this background in mind, we have planned a multicenter observational prospective cohort study involving some Italian Nephrology and Internal Medicine Units. The study aims to evaluate the effect of an SGLT2 inhibitor, Dapaglifozin, in Fabry disease patients with CKD stages 1–3. Specifically, the primary objective will be to determine the effect of Dapaglifozin on albuminuria, with a target of achieving a 20% reduction in albuminuria. As secondary aim, we will assess the effect of Dapaglifozin on kidney disease progression, measured by a reduction in eGFR < 3 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year and on clinical FD stability, defined by a FAbry STabilization indEX (FASTEX) score < 20 [30]. Additionally, any association of SGT2i with the progression of cardiac pathology, exercise capacity, kidney and inflammatory biomarkers, quality of life, and psychosocial factors will be evaluated.

3. Methods

The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee for Clinical Trials CESC (Ref No. 5499/AO/22). The primary and secondary end-points will include albuminuria, estimated GFR calculated using the CKD-EPI formula, septum ventricular diameter and diastolic function detected at echocardiography, left ventricular mass index/m2 and evolution of T1 mapping pattern at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), FASTEX score, 5 Times Sit to Stand Test (5STS) [31], 6 Minute Walking Test (6MWT) [32], Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET), quality of life and psychosocial questionnaires, and urinary tract infections. In addition, the dosage of exomes, IgG, IgG4, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), neutrophil-gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), liver-fatty-acid-binding protein (LFABP), isoprostane, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) will be tested.

The study will enroll male and female subjects aged 18 years or older with CKD stages 1–3, a genetic and biochemical diagnosis of FD and albuminuria for at least 6 months despite treatment with a stable dose of ERT or Migalastat for at least 12 months and ACEi or ARB titrated to the maximum tolerated dosage for at least 6 months. The subjects with immunosuppressive therapy, type 1 diabetes mellitus, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and recurrent urinary tract infections will be excluded.

On the basis of previous evidence [24], we estimated that at least 28 patients would need to be recruited to answer the research question with a 95% level of confidence and a margin of error of 5%.

The study will last two years and will include baseline, 12-month, and 24-month visits.

At the baseline visit, the demographic data (age, sex), anamnestic data (comorbidities, medications, underling kidney disease), and clinical parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, height, weight, Body Mass Index [BMI]) will be collected. Biochemical examinations (LysoGb3, hematocrit, hemoglobin, fasting glucose, creatinine, urea, cystatin C, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, uric acid, total proteins, albumin, vitamin D, parathormone, brain natriuretic peptide [BNP], troponin I, polymerase chain reaction [PCR], exomes, IgG, IgG4, KIM-1, NGAL, LFABP, isoprostane, IL-1, TNF-alpha, IL-6, and homocysteine) and a urinary sample (creatinine, albumin, urea, sodium, potassium, phosphate, proteins, urine test, urine cultures) will also be tested.

Additionally, the patient will undergo an exercise capacity assessment by means of the 6MWT, 5STS, and CPET tests and a psychosocial assessment using the following questionnaires: brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale 8 (MMAS-8), Chronic Illness Anticipated Stigma Scale (CIASS), Experience in Close Relationship Scale—Short Form (ECR-S), Health Care Relationship Trust Scale Revised (HCR-TS), Difficult Doctor–Patient Relationship Questionnaire 10 (DDPRQ-10), General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD 7), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System revised (ESAS-r), Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The qualities of life will be investigated using the 36-Item Short-form Survey (SF36). Finally, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, and cardiac MRI will be performed.

During the 12-month visit, the medical history will be updated, clinical parameters will be recorded, blood and urine tests will be repeated, the exercise capacity will be assessed using 6MWT, 5STS, and CPET, and the FASTEX Index will be also compiled.

At the 24-month visit, all the assessments and examinations from the baseline visit will be repeated.

The statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS 21.0. The continuous variables will be presented as means and standard deviations, or medians and interquartile ranges depending on their distribution, which will be assessed using histograms and QQ plots. The nominal variables will be reported as frequencies and percentages. To determine any possible associations between SGLT2i and the variables of the primary and secondary outcomes, Pearson and Spearman tests will be used for continuous variables, the Fisher exact test for nominal variables, and the Student or Mann–Whitney tests for continuous and nominal variables. Finally, ANOVA tests will be performed for multicategory variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statically significant for all tests.

4. Conclusions

This study will be the first in the literature to evaluate the effect of Dapaglifozin in patients with albuminuria affected by CKD secondary to Fabry’s disease, primarily on renal outcomes (albuminuria and CKD progression) and, secondarily, on cardiovascular outcomes, exercise capacity, and quality of life. It will provide new compelling evidence on the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in the field of rare diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.B. and G.C.; methodology L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation F.B., writing—review and editing, Y.B. and G.M.; supervision, N.V.; validation, G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee for Clinical Trials CESC (protocol code is 5499/AO/22 on 2 February 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent will be obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not available. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Mehta A., Hughes D.A. Fabry Disease. In: Adam M.P., Mirzaa G.M., Pagon R.A., Wallace S.E., Bean L.H., Gripp K.W., Amemiya A., editors. GeneReviews. University of Seattle; Seattle, WA, USA: 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Battaglia Y., Scalia S., Rinaldi R., Storari A., Mignani R., Russo D., Duro G. Identification of new α-galactosidase A mutation responsible for Fabry disease: A case report. Clin. Nephrol. 2019;91:126–128. doi: 10.5414/CN109501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Battaglia Y., Fiorini F., Azzini C., Esposito P., De vito A., Granata A., Storari A., Mignani R. Deficiency in the Screening Process of Fabry Disease: Analysis of Chronic Kidney Patients Not on Dialysis. Front. Med. 2021;8:876. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.640876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bertoldi G., Caputo I., Driussi G., Stefanelli L.F., Di Vico V., Carraro G., Nalesso F., Calò L.A. Biochemical Mechanisms beyond Glycosphingolipid Accumulation in Fabry Disease: Might They Provide Additional Therapeutic Treatments? J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:2063. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ravarotto V., Simioni F., Carraro G., Bertoldi G., Pagnin E., Calò L.A. Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular-Renal Damage in Fabry Disease: Is There Room for a Pathophysiological Involvement? J. Clin. Med. 2018;7:409. doi: 10.3390/jcm7110409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cocozza S., Russo C., Pisani A., Olivo G., Riccio E., Cervo A., Pontillo G., Feriozzi S., Veroux M., Battaglia Y., et al. Redefining the pulvinar sign in fabry disease. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2017;38:2264–2269. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pisani A., Petruzzelli Annicchiarico L., Pellegrino A., Bruzzese D., Feriozzi S., Imbriaco M., Tedeschi E., Cocozza S., De Rosa D., Mignani R., et al. Parapelvic cysts, a distinguishing feature of renal Fabry disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018;33:318–323. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Camporeale A., Moroni F., Lazzeroni D., Garibaldi S., Pieroni M., Pieruzzi F., Lusardi P., Spada M., Mignani R., Brulina A., et al. Trabecular complexity as an early marker of cardiac involvement in Fabry disease. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2022;23:200–208. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cocozza S., Olivo G., Riccio E., Russo C., Pontillo G., Ugga L., Migliaccio S., de Rosa D., Feriozzi S., Veroux M., et al. Corpus callosum involvement: A useful clue for differentiating Fabry Disease from Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroradiology. 2017;59:563–570. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1829-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bernardini A., Camporeale A., Pieroni M., Pieruzzi F., Figliozzi S., Lusardi P., Spada M., Mignani R., Burlina A., Carubbi F., et al. Atrial Dysfunction Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance as an Early Marker of Fabry Cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2020;13:2262–2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ortiz A., Germain D.P., Desnick R.J., Politei J., Mauer M., Burlina A., Eng C., Hopkin R.J., Laney D., Linhart A., et al. Fabry disease revisited: Management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2018;123:416–427. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wanner C., Oliveira J.P., Ortiz A., Mauer M., Germain D.P., Linthorst G.E., Serra A.L., Marodi L., Mignani R., Cianciarusso B., et al. Prognostic indicators of renal disease progression in adults with Fabry disease: Natural history data from the Fabry Registry. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010;5:2220–2228. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04340510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chimenti C., Nencini P., Pieruzzi F., Feriozzi S., Mignani R., Pieroni M., Pisani A. The GALA project: Practical recommendations for the use of migalastat in clinical practice on the basis of a structured survey among Italian experts. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2020;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-1318-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Palaiodimou L., Kokotis P., Zompola C., Papagiannopoulou G., Bakola E., Papadopoulou M., Zouvelou V., Petras D., Vlachopoulous C., Tsivgoulis G. Fabry Disease: Current and Novel Therapeutic Strategies. A Narrative Review. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2023;21:440–456. doi: 10.2174/1570159X20666220601124117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li X., Ren X., Zhang Y., Ding L., Huo M., Li Q. Fabry disease: Mechanism and therapeutics strategies. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13:1025740. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1025740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Germain D.P., Elliott P.M., Falissard B., Fomin V.V., Hilz M.J., Jovanovic A., Kantola I., Linhart A., Mignani R., Namdar M., et al. The effect of enzyme replacement therapy on clinical outcomes in male patients with Fabry disease: A systematic literature review by a European panel of experts. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2019;19:100454. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jaurretche S., Conde H., Gonzalez Schain A., Ruiz F., Sgro M.V., Venera G. Biomarkers for Monitoring Renal Damage Due to Fabry Disease in Patients Treated with Migalastat: A Review for Nephrologists. Genes. 2022;13:1751. doi: 10.3390/genes13101751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Germain D.P., Fouilhoux A., Decramer S., Tardieu M., Pillet P., Fila M., Rivera S., Deschênes G., Lacombe D. Consensus recommendations for diagnosis, management and treatment of Fabry disease in paediatric patients. Clin. Genet. 2019;96:107–117. doi: 10.1111/cge.13546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kunz R., Friedrich C., Wolbers M., Mann J.F.E. Meta-analysis: Effect of Monotherapy and Combination Therapy with Inhibitors of the Renin–Angiotensin System on Proteinuria in Renal Disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008;148:30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nuffield Department of Population Health Renal Studies Group. SGLT2 inhibitor Meta-Analysis Cardio-Renal Trialists’ Consortium Impact of diabetes on the effects of sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on kidney outcomes: Collaborative meta-analysis of large placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 2022;400:1788–1801. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02074-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vaduganathan M., Docherty K.F., Claggett B.L., Jhund P.S., de Boer R.A., Hernandez A.F., Inzucchi S.E., Kosiborod M.N., Lam C., Martinez F., et al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: A comprehensive meta-analysis of five randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2022;400:757–767. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01429-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:117–127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Solomon S.D., de Boer R.A., DeMets D., Hernandez A.F., Inzucchi S.E., Kosiborod M.N., Lam C.S.P., Martinez F., Shah S.I., Lindholm D., et al. Dapagliflozin in heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Rationale and design of the DELIVER trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2021;23:1217–1225. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jongs N., Greene T., Chertow G.M., McMurray J.J.V., Langkilde A.M., Correa-Rotter R., Rossing P., Sjöström C.D., Stefansson B.V., Toto R.D., et al. Effect of dapagliflozin on urinary albumin excretion in patients with chronic kidney disease with and without type 2 diabetes: A prespecified analysis from the DAPA-CKD trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:755–766. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00243-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yau K., Dharia A., Alrowiyti I., Cherney D.Z.I. Prescribing SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With CKD: Expanding Indications and Practical Considerations. Kidney Int. Rep. 2022;7:1463–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bailey C.J., Day C., Bellary S. Renal Protection with SGLT2 Inhibitors: Effects in Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2022;22:39–52. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01442-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tesař V. SGLT2 inhibitors in non-diabetic kidney disease. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2022;31:105–107. doi: 10.17219/acem/145734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Del Vecchio L., Beretta A., Jovane C., Peiti S., Genovesi S. A Role for SGLT-2 Inhibitors in Treating Non-diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease. Drugs. 2021;81:1491–1511. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01573-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ramos A.M., Fernández-Fernández B., Pérez-Gómez M.V., Carriazo Julio S.M., Sanchez-Niño M.D., Sanz A., Ruiz-Ortega M., Ortiz A. Design and optimization strategies for the development of new drugs that treat chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2020;15:101–115. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1690450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mignani R., Pieroni M., Pisani A., Spada M., Battaglia Y., Verrecchia E., Mangeri M., Feriozzi S., Tanini I., De Danieli G., et al. New insights from the application of the FAbry STabilization indEX in a large population of Fabry cases. Clin. Kidney J. 2019;12:65–70. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfy108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Aucella F., Battaglia Y., Bellizzi V., Bolignano D., Capitanini A., Cupisti A. Erratum to: Physical exercise programs in CKD: Lights, shades and perspectives. J. Nephrol. 2015;28:143–150. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0169-6. Erratum in J. Nephrol. 2015, 28, 521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aucella F., Gesuete A., Battaglia Y. A “nephrological” approach to physical activity. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2014;39:189–196. doi: 10.1159/000355796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not available. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES