Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2023 May 31;24(11):9566. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119566

Assembly and Comparative Analysis of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Two Species of Calla Lilies (Zantedeschia, Araceae)

Yanbing Guo 1,2,, Ziwei Li 1,2,, Shoulin Jin 3, Shuying Chen 3, Fei Li 2, Hongzhi Wu 2,*
Editor: Abir U Igamberdiev
PMCID: PMC10254018  PMID: 37298515

Abstract

In this study, the mitochondrial genomes of two calla species, Zantedeschia aethiopica Spreng. and Zantedeschia odorata Perry., were assembled and compared for the first time. The Z. aethiopica mt genome was assembled into a single circular chromosome, measuring 675,575 bp in length with a 45.85% GC content. In contrast, the Z. odorata mt genome consisted of bicyclic chromosomes (chromosomes 1 and 2), measuring 719,764 bp and exhibiting a 45.79% GC content. Both mitogenomes harbored similar gene compositions, with 56 and 58 genes identified in Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata, respectively. Analyses of codon usage, sequence repeats, gene migration from chloroplast to mitochondrial, and RNA editing were conducted for both Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata mt genomes. Phylogenetic examination based on the mt genomes of these two species and 30 other taxa provided insights into their evolutionary relationships. Additionally, the core genes in the gynoecium, stamens, and mature pollen grains of the Z. aethiopica mt genome were investigated, which revealed maternal mitochondrial inheritance in this species. In summary, this study offers valuable genomic resources for future research on mitogenome evolution and the molecular breeding of calla lily.

Keywords: Z. aethiopica, Z. odorata, hybrid assembly, mitochondrial genome, comparative analysis, maternal mitochondrial inheritance

1. Introduction

The Araceae family, one of the largest monocot families, comprises approximately 3667 species across 143 genera [1]. Many species within the family hold global significance in medicine and horticulture and as edible plants. The representative genus belonging to the Araceae family, the Zantedeschia genus, are herbaceous monocotyledonous ornamental geophytes indigenous to the swampy or mountainous regions of South Africa [2]. The genus encompasses eight species, divided into two sections. The Zantedeschia section includes two species, Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata, characterized by a white spathe and rhizomatous storage organs. In contrast, the Aestivea section comprises Z. albomaculata, Z. elliottiana, Z. jucunda, Z. pentlandii, Z. rehmannii, and Z. valida with various spathe colors and tuberous storage organs [2,3]. The colored species of Zantedeschia are of particular ornamental value due to the prolonged flowering period and vivid flower spathes obtained as a result of the interspecific crossing of Z. rehmannii, Z. elliottiana, Z. pentlandii, and Z. albomaculata [3,4]. On the contrary, Z. aethiopica has not only decorative but also practical applications in traditional medicine in some regions of Africa [5].

Prior research has indicated that colored Zantedeschia species are highly susceptible to Pectobacterium bacteria, causing considerable economic losses, whereas Z. aethiopica demonstrates greater tolerance to various abiotic and biotic stressors [6]. Nonetheless, interspecific hybrids between them experience plastome–genome incompatibility (PGI), leading to the production of albino offspring due to endosperm degeneration and chlorophyll-deficient abnormal embryos [7,8]. Consequently, the introduction of desirable traits, such as resistance (from Z. aethiopica) and showy spathes (from colored Zantedeschia), into hybrid offspring through conventional breeding strategies remains challenging.

Mitochondrial (mt) and chloroplast (cp) genomes possess semi-autonomous genetic systems in higher plant cells and carry essential genetic information. Previous studies have elucidated the PGI mechanism in Zantedeschia and revealed that Z. aethiopica exhibits biparental plastid inheritance and maternal mitochondrial inheritance, as evidenced by restriction fragment length polymorphism and cytological analyses [8,9]. However, a comprehensive understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms remains elusive, primarily due to the scarcity of essential genetic resources, particularly the absence of a reported mitochondrial genome for Zantedeschia. This deficiency severely impedes further investigation. Therefore, studying the Zantedeschia mitochondrial genome could help decipher the molecular mechanisms behind hybrid sterility and contribute to the improvement of Zantedeschia varieties. As of 23 March 2023, the NCBI database has published 10,385 chloroplast genomes, 1296 plastomes, and a mere 596 plant mitochondrial genomes (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse/#!/organelles/; accessed on 23 March 2023). This disparity underscores the complexity and difficulty of assembling plant mitogenomes [10]. Current evidence reveals that plant mt genomes exist in various structures, including circular molecules, linear conformations, branched structures, and polycyclic molecules [11,12,13,14,15]. Although plant mitogenomes differ significantly in size (from 66 kb to 11.3 Mb) [16,17], their gene contents remain highly conserved, with 24 core protein-coding genes (PCGs) in angiosperm mitogenomes [18]. Due to the complexity of studying plant mitogenomes, currently, only two Araceae species’ mitogenomes have been assembled and deposited in the NCBI database: Spirodela polyrhiza (NC_017840) and Amorphophallus albus (NC_066968). Mitogenome sequences still remain unavailable for most species of the family, impeding the development of new varieties with broader adaptive and commercial traits.

In this study, two complete mt genomes of the Zantedeschia species (Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata) were sequenced and annotated. synonymous codon usage (RSCU), sequence repeats, foreign DNA fragments, and RNA editing sites were analyzed in the two calla species. Available respective data on the other Araceae was also used for comparison with the aim of better understanding the evolution and origin of the Zantedeschia mitogenome. In addition, the expression of 24 core genes was determined in the gynoecium, stamens, and pollen grains of Z. aethiopica using RT-PCR. The results presented here provide a unique insight into the mitochondrial evolution of calla species, and it is also a basis for a depicted PGI mechanism and the molecular design breeding of Zantedeschia spp.

2. Results

2.1. Features of the Zantedeschia Mitogenome

The Z. aethiopica circular mt genome was 675,575 bp in length. The GC content was 45.85% (Table 1). For the Z. odorata mt genome, however, two circular contigs (chromosomes 1 and 2) were obtained, and it was 719,764 bp long with an overall GC content of 45.79%. The lengths of circular chromosomes 1 and 2 were 432,076 bp and 287,688 bp with GC contents of 45.95% and 45.54% (Table 1), respectively. The functional categorization and physical locations of the annotated genes are presented in Figure 1A,B. A total of 34 and 36 protein-coding genes (PCGs) were annotated in Z. aethiopica (the rpl2 and rps10 genes were absent) and Z. odorata, respectively. In addition, both species shared the same rRNA genes (3) and tRNA genes (19). These results indicated that the gene content of the two mt genomes was relatively conserved. Most PCGs occurred in single copies within the two mitogenomes (Table 2). However, ccmC presented two gene copies in Z. odorata. The two mitogenomes also contained the same RNA genes (rrn5, rrn18, and rrn26) and tRNAs (trnA-UGC, trnC-GCA, trnD-GUC, trnE-UUC, trnF-GAA, trnfM-CAU, trnG-GCC, trnH-GUG, trnI-CAU, trnK-UUU, trnM-CAU, trnN-GUU, trnP-UGG, trnQ-UUG, trnS-GCU, trnS-UGA, trnV-GAC, trnW-CCA, and trnY-GUA). It is worth noting that although most of the 19 tRNA genes are single-copy genes, the Z. aethiopica mitogenome possessed two copies of the trnH-GUG, trnI-CAU, trnM-CAU, and trnN-GUU genes, whereas the Z. odorata mitogenome possessed two copies of the trnH-GUG, trnI-CAU, and trnM-CAU genes.

Table 1.

Basic mitochondrial genome information.

Species Contigs Type Length GC Content
Z. aethiopica Chromosome 1 Circular 675,575 bp 45.85%
Z. odorata Chromosome 1–2 Branched 719,764 bp 45.79%
Chromosome 1 Circular 432,076 bp 45.95%
Chromosome 2 Circular 287,688 bp 45.54%

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Circular maps of the Z. aethiopica (A) and Z. odorata (B) mt genomes. Genes shown on the outside and inside of the circle are transcribed clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively. Genes belonging to different functional groups are color-coded.

Table 2.

Genes predicted in the mitogenomes of Z. aethiopica and Z. odoaata.

Group of Genes Name of Genes
Z. aethiopica Z. odorata
Core genes ATP synthase atp1, atp4, atp6, atp8, and atp9 Atp1, atp4, atp6, atp8, and atp9
NADH dehydrogenase nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, nad6, nad7, and nad9 nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, nad6, nad7, and nad9
Cytochrome c biogenesis cob Cob
Ubiquinol cytochrome c reductase ccmB, ccmC, ccmFC, and ccmFN ccmB, ccmC2, ccmFC, and ccmFN
Cytochrome c oxidase cox1, cox2, and cox3 cox1, cox2, and cox3
Maturases matR matR
Transport membrane protein mttB mttB
Variable genes Large subunit of ribosome rpl5, rpl10, and rpl16 rpl2, rpl5, rpl10, and rpl16
Small subunit of ribosome rps3, rps4, rps7, rps12, rps13, and rps14 rps3, rps4, rps7, rps10, rps12, rps13, and rps14
Succinate dehydrogenase sdh4 sdh4
rRNA genes Ribosome RNA rrn5, rrn18, and rrn26 rrn5, rrn18, and rrn26
tRNA genes Transfer RNA trnA-UGC, trnC-GCA, trnD-GUC, trnE-UUC, trnF-GAA, trnfM-CAU, trnG-GCC, trnH-GUG  2, trnI-CAU 2, trnK-UUU, trnM-CAU  2, trnN-GUU  2, trnP-UGG, trnQ-UUG, trnS-GCU, trnS-UGA, trnV-GAC, trnW-CCA, and trnY-GUA trnA-UGC, trnC-GCA, trnD-GUC, trnE-UUC, trnF-GAA, trnfM-CAU, trnG-GCC, trnH-GUG  2, trnI-CAU  2, trnK-UUU, trnM-CAU  2, trnN-GUU, trnP-UGG, trnQ-UUG, trnS-GCU, trnS-UGA, trnV-GAC, trnW-CCA, and trnY-GUA

Note: “2”: genes with two copies.

2.2. Codon Usage Analysis of the PCGs

The codon usage analysis of 34 and 36 PCGs in the mt genomes of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata was performed, respectively, with the codon usage per amino acid displayed in Tables S1 and S2. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values greater than 1 are considered to indicate amino acid preferences. As depicted in Figure 2, in addition to the RSCU values of both the initial codon AUG (Met) and UGG (Trp) being 1, there was also a general preference for codon usage in mitochondrial PCGs. In Z. aethiopica, GCU (Ala) had the highest RSCU value of 1.60 for the GCU codon in mitochondrial PCGs. Moreover, the stop codon UAA exhibited codon usage preference with an RSCU value of 1.59. For Z. odorata, however, the stop codon UAA demonstrated a high degree of codon usage preference with the highest RSCU value among the mitochondrial PCGs, with this value reaching 1.76. This was followed by alanine (Ala) with GCU preferred with an RSCU value of 1.61. Notably, the maximum RSCU values for lysine (Lys) and phenylalanine (Phe) were less than 1.2 within two calla species, indicating no strong codon usage preference.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Z. aethiopica (A) and Z. odorata (B) mitogenome relative synonymous codon usage. The codon families are shown on the X-axis. The RSCU values are the number of times a particular codon is observed relative to the number of times that codon would be expected for uniform synonymous codon usage.

2.3. Repeats Analysis of Zantedeschia Mitogenomes

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in the mt genomes of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata were identified using MISA software (v2.1) (https://webblast.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/; accessed on 1 March 2023). In the Z. aethiopica mt genome, 139 SSRs were found, with monomeric and dimeric SSRs occupying 31.65% of the total SSRs (Figure 3A). Among the 13 monomer SSRs, adenine (A) monomer repeats constituted 53.85% (7), while the most frequent dimeric SSR was the TA repeat, comprising 29.03%. Tetrameric SSRs were the most common, representing 51.08% (71) of the total SSRs (Table S3). For the Z. odorata mt genome, 79 and 66 SSRs were detected in chromosomes 1 and 2, respectively, and the monomeric and dimeric SSRs occupied 31.65% and 36.36% of the respective total SSR. In chromosome 1, adenine (A) monomer repeats comprised 80.00% (4) of the five monomer SSRs, and TA repeats were the most frequent dimeric SSRs, making up 30.00%. The most common SSRs were tetranucleotide, representing 45.57% of the SSRs. In chromosome 2, adenine (A) monomer repeats constituted 62.50% (5) of the eight monomer SSRs, and CT repeats were the most frequent dimeric SSRs, comprising 31.25%. Tetranucleotide SSRs were also the most common, accounting for 50.00% of the SSRs (Tables S4 and S5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Detected repeats in the Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata mitogenomes. (A) Type and number of detected SSRs repeats. (B) Type and number of detected tandem and dispersed repeats.

Tandem repeats, also called satellite DNA, consist of core repeating units of approximately 1 to 200 bases repeated several times in tandem. These repeats are widely present in eukaryotic genomes and some prokaryotes. As illustrated in Figure 3B, 47 tandem repeats ranging from 11 to 66 bp in length with a matching degree greater than 66% were found in the Z. aethiopica mt genome (Table S6). In the Z. odorata mt genome, 32 tandem repeats ranging from 11 to 66 bp with a matching degree greater than 66% were identified in chromosome 1. In chromosome 2, 25 tandem repeats ranging from 14 to 56 bp with a matching degree greater than 73% were detected (Tables S7 and S8).

Dispersed repeats in the mt genomes of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata were also analyzed (Table S9). In Z. aethiopica, a total of 1746 pairs of dispersed repeats with lengths of 30 or more were observed, including 891 pairs of palindromic repeats (up to 189 bp) and 855 pairs of forward repeats (up to 283 bp). In chromosome 1 of Z. odorata, 1746 pairs of dispersed repeats with lengths of 30 or more were identified, including 891 pairs of palindromic repeats (the longest being 210 bp) and 855 pairs of forward repeats (the longest being 164 bp). In chromosome 2 of Z. odorata, 475 pairs of dispersed repeats with lengths of 30 or more were observed, including 193 pairs of palindromic repeats (the longest being 106 bp) (Tables S10 and S11). No complement and reverse repeats were detected within the two calla species.

2.4. Analysis of Homologous Fragments of Mitochondria and Chloroplasts

The sequence similarity analysis revealed a total of 29 fragments homologous to the mt and cp genome in Z. aethiopica, with a combined length of 48,353 bp, constituting 7.16% of the total mitogenome length (Figure 4A, Table S12). This homologous sequence is called mitochondrial plastid sequences (MTPTs). The longest fragment among these, MTPT15, spans 4760 bp. Annotation of these homologous sequences identified 12 complete genes, including eight (PCGs) (atpB, atpE, ndhK, ndhC, psaA, rpl23, rpoB, and rps7) and four tRNA genes (trnI-CAU, trnN-GUU, trnM-CAU, trnW-CCA). In Z. odorata, 25 homologous fragments were identified, with a total length of 47,946 bp, representing 6.66% of the mt genome (Figure 4B, Table S13). The longest fragment, MTPT7, measured 4333 bp. These homologous fragments encompassed 12 annotated genes, including nine PCGs (atpB, atpE, ndhK, ndhC, psaA, rpl2, rpl23, rpoB, and rps7) and three tRNA genes (trnI-CAU, trnM-CAU, and trnW-CCA).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Schematic diagram of gene transfer between chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes in Z. aethiopica (A) and Z. odorata (B). The yellow and green arcs represent the mitogenome and chloroplast genomes, respectively, with the purple lines between the arcs corresponding to homologous genomic fragments.

2.5. Prediction of RNA Editing Sites in PCGs

The PREP (Predictive RNA Editors for Plants) suite was employed to identify potential RNA editing sites within the PCGs of the Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata mt genomes. As shown in Figure 5, the two mitogenomes exhibited similar editing site numbers. For example, Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata contained 522 and 512 C-U editing sites, respectively. Approximately 325 RNA editing sites occurred at the second base of each codon in two species. In contrast, approximately 187 sites occurred at the first base of the codon (Tables S14 and S15). For Z. aethiopica, the CcmB gene exhibited the highest number of editing sites among all mitochondrial genes, with 41 RNA editing sites. The next highest number was 39 for ccmFN. The rps14 gene was predicted to have only one RNA editing event, the lowest among all genes. Interestingly, the types and numbers of RNA editing events in the Z. odorata mt genome were consistent with those in Z. aethiopica, except for the ccmC, cox2, rpl2, and rpl5 genes.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Number of RNA editing sites identified in each PCG of the Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata mt genomes.

2.6. Phylogenetic and Synteny Analysis

To ascertain the evolutionary status of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata, phylogenetic trees were constructed based on 18 conserved mitochondrial PCGs (atp1, atp4, atp6, ccmB, ccmC, ccmFC, ccmFN, cob, cox1, cox2, matR, nad1, nad2, nad4, nad5, nad6, nad7, and nad9) from five orders of angiosperms (Poales, Arecales, Asparagales, Alismatales, and Ranunculales). Pulsatilla dahurica and Aconitum kusnezoffii of the Ranunculales were designated as outgroups. As depicted in Figure 6, the phylogenetic topology based on mitochondrial DNA was consistent with the latest APG (Angiosperm Phylogenetic Group) classification (Figure 7), with the phylogenetic tree providing robust support for the grouping of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata, which are closely related to S. polyrhiza of the Araceae family within Alismatales.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The phylogenetic relationships of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata with the 30 other represented land plants. Numbers on each node are bootstrap support values. The colors indicate the families of each species.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata mitogenomes synteny. Bars indicated the mitogenomes, and the ribbons display the homologous sequences between the adjacent species. The red areas indicate where the reversal occurred, the gray areas indicate regions of good homology. Common blocks less than 0.5 kb in length are not retained, and regions that fail to have a common block indicate that they are peculiar to the species.

As illustrated in Figure 8, the dot plot analysis identified a positive repeat sequence of approximately 100 kb in length shared between the Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata mitogenomes. Nearly 20 kb collinearity blocks were identified in the dot plot comparing Z. aethiopica and S. polyrhiza, and similarly sized collinearity blocks were also detected in the Z. odorata and S. polyrhiza mt genomes. These findings indicate that the arrangement order of collinear blocks varies between individual mitochondrial genomes, suggesting that the Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata mt genomes have undergone extensive genome rearrangements with nearby species and that the mt genomes are highly divergent in structure.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Dot plot analysis of the mitochondrial sequences. The Self dot plots of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata are shown in the upper left and middle corner, respectively. The dot plots of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata are shown in the upper right corner. The rest are dot plots of Z. aethiopica with S. polyrhiza and Z. odorata with S. polyrhiza.

2.7. RT-PCR Validation of Mitogenome Core Genes (24) of in Z. aethiopica

A previous study has demonstrated that the mitochondrial DNA of mature pollen grains in Z. aethiopica is significantly degraded, as evidenced by the cytological findings, which suggests maternal mitochondrial inheritance [9]. Here, the expression of 24 core genes was tested in the gynoecium, stamens, and mature pollen grains of Z. aethiopica using RT-PCR (Figure 9). As depicted in Figure 9D, 11 genes (atp1, atp4, atp8, atp9, nad1, nad4L, nad5, nad6, nad7, ccm, and ccmC) were successfully amplified in both the gynoecium and stamens, while only four genes (atp4, atp8, atp9, and nad7) were detected in mature pollen grains. Furthermore, the detected genes displayed degradation in mature pollen grains, with the exception of the atp9 gene. These results provide molecular evidence supporting the notion of maternal mitochondrial inheritance in Z. aethiopica.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

The validation of the 24 core genes in the gynoecium, stamens, and mature pollen grains in Z. aethiopica by RT-PCR. (A) Spathe of Z. aethiopica; (B) Gy—gynoecium and St—stamens; (C) Mps—mature pollen grains; (D) RT-PCR detection of 24 core genes: 1 to 24 represent the atp1, atp4, atp6, atp8, atp9, nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, nad6, nad7, nad9, ccmC, ccmFC, and ccmFN, cox1, cox2, cox3, mttB, matR, and cob genes. M: marker (2000 bp, 1000 bp, 750 bp, 500 bp, 250 bp, 100 bp).

3. Discussion

3.1. The Characteristics of Zantedeschia Mitogenome

The plant mt genome is an evolutionarily dynamic entity characterized by remarkable diversity in genome size, genome structure, and gene content [19]. Higher plant mitogenomes exhibit considerable variation in size and gene content, ranging from 66 Kb to 11.3 Mb and encompassing 19 to 64 known genes [16,17]. Plant mitogenomes display diverse conformations, with the majority of the assembled mitogenomes being circular. However, other structures, such as polycyclic [15,20,21], linear [13], and multi-branched structures [14], also exist. In this study, a hybrid assembly strategy was employed, combining Illumina short-read and Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing to complete the mitogenomes of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata, members of the Zantedeschia genus in the Araceae family. The comparative analysis revealed conservation of mt genome size and gene contents within the Zantedeschia genus, albeit with complex genome structures. The Z. aethiopica mt genome was a single-ring structure of 675,575 bp, comprising 56 genes, while the Z. odorata mt genome iwa assembled into two circular chromosomes totaling 719,764 bp and including 58 genes (Figure 1, Table 1 and Table 2).

Plant mt genomes are abundant in repeat sequences, which consist of SSRs, tandem repeats, short repeats, and large repeats [12,22]. It has been reported that repeat sequences play a crucial role in shaping the mt genome [22,23]. In this study, SSRs, tandem repeats, and dispersed repeats were investigated in the two sequenced Zantedeschia mt genomes. The comparative repeat analyses of the two Zantedeschia mitogenomes (Figure 3) revealed an absence of repeats larger than 350 bp, which might contribute to the stability of genome sizes and gene contents within the Zantedeschia genus. While the highly complex repeat patterns may be responsible for the intricate mt genome structure in plant species, the mitogenome structure is not solely determined by repeats, which might explain the distinct structures of the two Zantedeschia mt genomes.

Plant multi-chromosomal mitogenomes often exhibit an uneven distribution of functional genes between chromosomes, with numerous chromosomes in plant multi-chromosomal mitogenomes lacking functional genes [24]. In this study, it was observed that 24 PCGs were unevenly distributed between chromosome 1 (17 PCGs) and chromosome 2 (7 PCGs) in the Z. odorata mt genome. Further transcriptome studies are needed to determine whether these genes can be appropriately expressed in plant mitochondria.

3.2. RNA Editing and Intracellular Gene Transfer of Zantedeschia Organelle Genomes

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process that occurs in all higher plants [25], contributing to the maintenance of amino acid sequence conservation in essential functional proteins of the mt genome [26,27]. RNA editing enhances the diversity of gene products, leading to the translation of novel proteins with functional roles [28,29,30]. Previous studies have reported approximately 441 RNA-editing sites within 36 genes in Arabidopsis and 491 RNA-editing sites within 34 genes in rice [31,32]. In this study, it was observed that the number of RNA editing sites in PCGs was remarkably conserved in Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata, with 522 RNA editing sites within 34 PCGs in Z. aethiopica and 512 RNA editing sites within 36 PCGs in Z. odorata; both of these results demonstrate C-U RNA editing.

In angiosperm plants, gene transfer from cp to mt genomes is a common occurrence during long-term evolution [33,34]. In this study, 29 MTPTs were identified in Z. aethiopica and 25 MTPTs in Z. odorata. These MTPTs spanned 48,353 bp and 47,946 bp in length, accounting for 7.16% and 6.66% of the Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata mitogenomes, respectively. These results support the conclusion that approximately 1–10.3% of mtDNA is derived from the chloroplast genome [35].

3.3. Phylogenetic Inference and Synteny Analysis

In the present study, the phylogenetic relationship of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata was analyzed with representative taxa based on mt genome information. The resulting phylogenetic trees reflected well-defined taxonomic relationships between taxa. The mt genome sequences of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata have good co-linear blocks, indicating that the two species have undergone extensive rearrangement phenomena. It can be speculated that a broken fusion occurred between their different chromosomes, i.e., that Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata did not differentiate at the same time, but evolved from one species to another.

3.4. Z. aethiopica Displays Maternal Mitochondrial Inheritance

Maternal inheritance of mitochondria has been reported in a group of angiosperms, including Actinidia deliciosa [36], Medicago sativa [37], Turnera ulmifolia [9], and Z. aethiopica [9], based on cytological evidence. In this study, molecular evidence was obtained for Z. aethiopica, revealing that most core genes were significantly degraded in mature pollen grains, as demonstrated by RT-PCR (Figure 9). Only 4 out of 24 core genes were normally amplified, with the others displaying various levels of degradation and the majority not being detected. These results are consistent with Ji [9], which also found that most mitochondrial DNA was significantly degraded in Z. aethiopica mature pollen grains. The mechanism of maternal mitochondrial inheritance warrants further investigation in the future.

3.5. The Prospects of Zantedeschia Mitogenome Research

Future studies could analyze the structure of the calla lily mitochondrial genome at the population level, including parental and hybrid offspring. Cryoelectron microscopy could be employed to visualize the actual structural characterization of the calla lily mitochondrial genome. Additionally, hybridization experiments should be conducted to obtain multiple interspecific hybrid offspring to investigate the relationship between PGI and the mt genome. These studies will provide a substantial foundation for understanding mt genome evolution and facilitate mitochondrial-based breeding.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials, DNA Extraction, and Sequencing

Fresh young leaves of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata were collected from the Garden Greenhouse (Geospatial coordinates: 102.83945, 24.88627), College of Landscape and Horticulture, Yunnan Agricultural University (Kunming, Yunnan Province, China). High-quality genomic DNA was extracted using the CTAB method [38]. DNA sample quality was evaluated with agarose gel electrophoresis, and the concentration was measured using a Nanodrop instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, 2000c UV-Vis). The qualified samples were sent to Wuhan GrandOmics Technology Co., Ltd. (http://www.grandomics.com; accessed on 12 December 2022) for Illumina sequencing and Oxford Nanopore sequencing.

4.2. Assembly and Annotation of Mitochondrial Genomes

Flye (v.2.9.1-b1780) [39] was used to de novo assemble the long-reads of the two Zantedeschia species with the parameters of ‘-min-overlap 4000’. For the assembled contigs, the draft mitogenome based on Nanopore long-reads was identified using the BLASTn [40] program. Here specifically, makeblastdb was used to construct a database for the assembled sequences by Flye, and then the conserved mitochondrial genes from Liriodendron tulipifera (NC_021152.1) were used as the query sequence to identify contigs containing conserved mitochondrial genes. The short-reads and long-reads were then mapped to these contigs, and all mapped reads were retained using BWA and SAMTools [41,42]. Finally, Illumina short-reads and Nanopore long-reads were combined for hybrid assembly by using Unicycler (v0.5.0) [43], with the parameters of ‘-kmers 27, 53, 71, 87, 99, 111, 119, 127’. In this step, the mapped Illumina short-reads were first assembled by calling spades [44], and then, the Nanopore long-reads were used to resolve the regions of repetitive sequences of the assembly by calling minimap2 [45]. The GFA format files generated by Unicycler were visualized using Bandage [46]. Unicycler generated one circular contigs for Z. aethiopica and two circular contigs for Z. odorata.

The protein and rRNA genes of the mt genome were annotated using the online GeSeq tool [47] and local BLASTN [40], with Spirodela polyrhiza (NC_017840), Arabidopsis thaliana (NC_037304), and Liriodendron tulipifera (NC_021152.1) as references, and the tRNAs were identified with tRNAscan (version 1.4) [48]. Apollo software (v1.11.8) was used to manually modify and correct annotation errors for each mitochondrial genome [49]. The mitochondrial genome maps were drawn using Organellar Genome DRAW (OGDRAW) (v1.3.1) [50].

4.3. Analysis of Codon Usage and Repeated Sequences

The protein-coding sequences of the genome were extracted using Phylosuite (v1.2.2) [51]. Mega 7.0 [52] was used to perform codon preference analysis on the PCGs of the mitochondrial genome and calculate RSCU values. The MISA [53], TRF (https://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.unix.help.html; accessed on 1 March 2023), and REPuter web server (https://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/reputer/; accessed on 1 March 2023) were used to identify repetitive sequences including microsatellite sequence repeats, tandem repeats, and dispersed repeats [54,55]. The results were visualized using Excel (2021) software.

4.4. Analyses of Chloroplast to Mitochondrion DNA Transformation and RNA Editing

The cp genome of Z. aethiopica (MH743155) and Z. odorata (MG432242) were downloaded from the NCBI Organelle Genome Resources Database. The homologous fragments in the mt and cp genomes were identified using BLASTN [40] software (v0.0.5), and the results were visualized using the Circos package (v0.69) [56]. Putative RNA editing sites in the PCGs of two calla species were predicted at a cutoff value = 0.2 criterion using the web server (http://www.prepact.de/; accessed on 2 March 2023) PREPACT3 (v3.12.0) [57].

4.5. Analysis of Phylogeny and Synteny

The mitogenomes of closely related species were selected and downloaded (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; accessed on 4 March 2023) based on their affinity. A total of 30 mitogenomes were downloaded, including two outgroups (Pulsatilla dahurica: NC_071219.1 and Aconitum kusnezoffii: NC_053920.1). These species (Table S16) were then used for phylogenetic analysis along with the two Zantedeschia species that were newly sequenced. Firstly, the 24 core orthologous genes among the analyzed species were extracted by using PhyloSuite (v.1.2.2) [51]. Then, the corresponding nucleotide sequences were aligned using MAFFT (v7.471) [58]. Next, these aligned sequences were concatenated and used to construct the phylogenetic trees. The maximum likelihood (ML) method was implemented in IQ-TREE (version 2.1.4-beta) [59] under the GTR + F + I + I + R2 model. The bootstrap analysis was performed with 1000 replicates. The phylogenetic tree was edited on the online website ITOL [60].

Four closed species (Spirodela polyrhiza (NC_017840.1), Butomus umbellatus (NC_021399.1), Zostera japonica (NC_068803.1), and Stratiotes aloides (NC_035317.1)) were selected for the co-linear analysis with Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata. Conserved homologous sequences, referred to as collinear blocks, were identified using the BLASTn program [39] with parameters of ‘-evalue 1e-5, -word_size 9, -gapopen 5, -gapextend 2, -reward 2, and -penalty 3’. Only collinear blocks that exceeded 500 bp in length were chosen for further analysis. MCscanX [61] was utilized to generate the multiple synteny plot based on the results obtained from the BLASTn program. Pairwise comparisons (Z. aethiopica, Z. odorata, and S. polyrhiza) of dot plots were generated, and conserved co-linear blocks were plotted using MAFFT with default parameters [58].

4.6. RT-PCR of Mitogenome Core Genes of Gynoecium, Stamens, and Mature Pollen Grains in Z. aethiopica

Z. aethiopica gynoecium, stamens, and mature pollen grains were collected from the Garden Greenhouse (Geospatial coordinates: 102.83945, 24.88627), College of Landscape and Horticulture, Yunnan Agricultural University (Kunming, Yunnan Province, China). Total RNA was isolated from the gynoecium, stamens, and pollen grains using an RNA extraction kit (TIANGEN, DP432, Beijing, China). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using a FastKing RT Kit (TIANGEN, KR116, Beijing, China). RT-PCR was performed using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S17, with the following amplification conditions: 94 °C for 2 min; 32 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

5. Conclusions

In this study, two mt genomes of calla lily (Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata) were sequenced, assembled, and annotated, and comprehensive analyses were conducted based on the DNA and amino acid sequences of the annotated genes. The two calla species’ mitogenomes shared similar gene contents but varied in structure. The Z. aethiopica mt genome’s length of the one circular chromosome was 675,575 bp, and the GC content was 45.85%. Meanwhile, the Z. odorata mt genome consisted of two circular chromosomes with a total genome size of 719,764 bp and a GC content of 45.79%. By comparing the mt genomes and the cp genomes, 29 and 25 homologous fragments were found in the two species, respectively. Furthermore, codon usage, repeated sequences, RNA editing, and synteny were analyzed. Moreover, phylogenetic trees based on the mitogenomes of 30 species contributed to the taxonomic classification of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata. Lastly, maternal mitochondrial inheritance was demonstrated in Z. aethiopica using RT-PCR. This study provides pivotal genomic resources for understanding and utilizing this vital ornamental plant in the future, particularly in elucidating the PGI mechanism in plants.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the laboratory and our collaborators for many useful suggestions. We sincerely thank Wuhan Benagen Technology Co., Ltd. (www.benagen.com; accessed on 4 March 2023) and the MitoRun research group who participated in this project.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24119566/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.G. and Z.L. contributed equally to this work; H.W. completed the conceptualization; Y.G. and Z.L. collected the sample; Y.G. and Z.L. assembled and annotated the mitogenome; Y.G. and Z.L. carried out the comparative analysis; S.J., S.C. and F.L. contributed to the visualization; Y.G. and Z.L. wrote the manuscript; and H.W. reviewed the manuscript critically. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences of two mitogenomes of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata are provided as fasta files, along with the annotation information, which is provided as Genbank files and is available through Figshare ((https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591324; accessed on 12 April 2023), (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591318; accessed on 12 April 2023), (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591330; accessed on 12 April 2023), and (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591327; accessed on 12 April 2023)).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31960610, 32160723). The funders were not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Croat T.B. Araceae, a Family with Great Potential. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2019;104:3–9. doi: 10.3417/2018213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Letty C. The Genus Zantedeschia. Bothalia. 1973;11:5–26. doi: 10.4102/abc.v11i1/2.1963. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singh Y. Contributions to the Systematic of the Genus Zantedeschia Spreng. (Araceae) Volume 169 University of Pretoria Press; Pretoria, South Africa: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yao J.-L., Rowland R., Cohen D., Rowl R. Karyotype studies in the genus Zantedeschia (Araceae) S. Afr. J. Bot. 1994;60:4–7. doi: 10.1016/S0254-6299(16)30653-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hutchings A., Haxton S.A., Lewis G., Cunningham A. Zulu Medicinal Plants: An Inventory. Volume 464 University of Natal Press; Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Snijder R.C., Cho H.-R., Hendriks M.M., Lindhout P., van Tuyl J.M. Genetic variation in Zantedeschia spp. (Araceae) for resistance to soft rot caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. Euphytica. 2004;135:119–128. doi: 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000009546.88984.60. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yao J.-L., Cohen D., Rowland R. Interspecific albino and variegated hybrids in the genus Zantedeschia. Plant Sci. 1995;109:199–206. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(95)04163-O. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yao J.-L., Cohen D., Rowland R.E. Plastid DNA inheritance and plastome-genome incompatibility in interspecific hybrids of Zantedeschia (Araceae) Theor. Appl. Genet. 1994;88:255–260. doi: 10.1007/BF00225906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ji X., Zhang Q., Liu Y. Sodmergen Presence of plastid and absence of mitochondrial DNA in male reproductive cells as evidence for cytoplasmic inheritance in Turnera ulmifolia and Zantedeschia aethiopica. Protoplasma. 2004;224:211–216. doi: 10.1007/s00709-004-0065-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bi C., Lu N., Xu Y., He C., Lu Z. Characterization and Analysis of the Mitochondrial Genome of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by Comparative Genomic Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:3778. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sloan D.B. One ring to rule them all? Genome sequencing provides new insights into the ‘master circle’ model of plant mitochondrial DNA structure. New Phytol. 2013;200:978–985. doi: 10.1111/nph.12395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gualberto J.M., Mileshina D., Wallet C., Niazi A.K., Weber-Lotfi F., Dietrich A. The plant mitochondrial genome: Dynamics and maintenance. Biochimie. 2014;100:107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kozik A., Rowan B.A., Lavelle D., Berke L., Schranz M.E., Michelmore R.W., Christensen A.C. The alternative reality of plant mitochondrial DNA: One ring does not rule them all. PLoS Genet. 2019;15:e1008373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jackman S.D., Coombe L., Warren R.L., Kirk H., Trinh E., MacLeod T., Pleasance S., Pandoh P., Zhao Y., Coope R.J., et al. Complete Mitochondrial Genome of a Gymnosperm, Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis), Indicates a Complex Physical Structure. Genome Biol. Evol. 2020;12:1174–1179. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaa108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dierckxsens N., Bai M.-Z., Guo Y.-Y. Multichromosomal mitochondrial genome of Paphiopedilum micranthum: Compact and fragmented genome, and rampant intracellular gene transfer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:3976. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Skippington E., Barkman T.J., Rice D.W., Palmer J.D. Miniaturized mitogenome of the parasitic plant Viscum scurruloideum is extremely divergent and dynamic and has lost all nad genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E3515–E3524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504491112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Putintseva Y.A., Bondar E.I., Simonov E.P., Sharov V.V., Oreshkova N.V., Kuzmin D.A., Konstantinov Y.M., Shmakov V.N., Belkov V.I., Sadovsky M.G., et al. Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) mitochondrial genome assembled using both short and long nucleotide sequence reads is currently the largest known mitogenome. BMC Genom. 2020;21:654. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07061-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zardoya R. Recent advances in understanding mitochondrial genome diversity. F1000Research. 2020;9:270. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21490.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mower J.P. Variation in protein gene and intron content among land plant mitogenomes. Mitochondrion. 2020;53:203–213. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2020.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Christiane F., Mark C., Yan G., Barry M. The maize mitochondrial genome: Dynamic, yet functional. Trends Genet. 1995;11:228–235. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89056-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang S., Li D., Yao X., Song Q., Wang Z., Zhang Q., Zhong C., Liu Y., Huang H. Evolution and Diversification of Kiwifruit Mitogenomes through Extensive Whole-Genome Rearrangement and Mosaic Loss of Intergenic Sequences in a Highly Variable Region. Genome Biol. Evol. 2019;11:1192–1206. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guo W., Zhu A., Fan W., Mower J.P. Complete mitochondrial genomes from the ferns Ophioglossum californicum and Psilotum nudum are highly repetitive with the largest organellar introns. New Phytol. 2017;213:391–403. doi: 10.1111/nph.14135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dong S., Zhao C., Chen F., Liu Y., Zhang S., Wu H., Zhang L., Liu Y. The complete mitochondrial genome of the early flowering plant Nymphaea colorata is highly repetitive with low recombination. BMC Genom. 2018;19:614. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4991-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang K., Wang Y., Zhang X., Han Z., Shan X. Deciphering the mitochondrial genome of Hemerocallis citrina (Asphodelaceae) using a combined assembly and comparative genomic strategy. Front. Plant Sci. 2022;13:1051221. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1051221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu Z., Cuthbert J.M., Taylor D.R., Sloan D.B. The massive mitochondrial genome of the angiosperm Silene noctiflora is evolving by gain or loss of entire chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:10185–10191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421397112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lu Y. RNA editing of plastid-encoded genes. Photosynthetica. 2018;56:48–61. doi: 10.1007/s11099-017-0761-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Small I.D., Schallenberg-Rüdinger M., Takenaka M., Mireau H., Ostersetzer-Biran O. Plant organellar RNA editing: What 30 years of research has revealed. Plant J. 2020;101:1040–1056. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gualberto J.M., LaMattina L., Bonnard G., Weil J.-H., Grienenberger J.-M. RNA editing in wheat mitochondria results in the conservation of protein sequences. Nature. 1989;341:660–662. doi: 10.1038/341660a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yan J., Zhang Q., Yin P. RNA editing machinery in plant organelles. Sci. China Life Sci. 2018;61:162–169. doi: 10.1007/s11427-017-9170-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lukeš J., Kaur B., Speijer D. RNA Editing in Mitochondria and Plastids: Weird and Widespread. Trends Genet. 2021;37:99–102. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Unseld M., Marienfeld J.R., Brandt P., Brennicke A. The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366,924 nucleotides. Nat. Genet. 1997;15:57–61. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Notsu Y., Masood S., Nishikawa T., Kubo N., Akiduki G., Nakazono M., Hirai A., Kadowaki K. The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) mitochondrial genome: Frequent DNA sequence acquisition and loss during the evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2002;268:434–445. doi: 10.1007/s00438-002-0767-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang X.-C., Chen H., Yang D., Liu C. Diversity of mitochondrial plastid DNAs (MTPTs) in seed plants. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2018;29:635–642. doi: 10.1080/24701394.2017.1334772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gui S., Wu Z., Zhang H., Zheng Y., Zhu Z., Liang D., Ding Y. The mitochondrial genome map of Nelumbo nucifera reveals ancient evolutionary features. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30158. doi: 10.1038/srep30158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sloan D.B., Wu Z. History of Plastid DNA Insertions Reveals Weak Deletion and AT Mutation Biases in Angiosperm Mitochondrial Genomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014;6:3210–3221. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Testolin R., Cipriani G. Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA and maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in the genus Actinidia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1997;94:897–903. doi: 10.1007/s001220050493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Forsthoefel N.R., Bohnert H.J., Smith S.E. Discordant Inheritance of Mitochondrial and Plastid DNA in Diverse Alfalfa Genotypes. J. Hered. 1992;83:342–345. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Arseneau J.-R., Steeves R., Laflamme M. Modified low-salt CTAB extraction of high-quality DNA from contaminant-rich tissues. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2017;17:686–693. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kolmogorov M., Yuan J., Lin Y., Pevzner P.A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen Y., Ye W., Zhang Y., Xu Y. High speed BLASTN: An accelerated MegaBLAST search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:7762–7768. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li H., Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., Marth G., Abecasis G., Durbin R., 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wick R.R., Judd L.M., Gorrie C.L., Holt K.E. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bankevich A., Nurk S., Antipov D., Gurevich A.A., Dvorkin M., Kulikov A.S., Lesin V.M., Nikolenko S.I., Pham S., Prjibelski A.D., et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li H. Minimap2: Pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wick R.R., Schultz M.B., Zobel J., Holt K.E. Bandage: Interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Michael T., Pascal L., Tommaso P., Ulbricht-Jones E.S., Axel F., Ralph B., Stephan G. GeSeq—Versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W6–W11. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lowe T.M., Eddy S.R. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lewis S.E., Searle S.M.J., Harris N., Gibson M., Iyer V., Richter J., Wiel C., Bayraktaroglu L., Birney E., Crosby M.A., et al. Apollo: A sequence annotation editor. Genome Biol. 2002;3:research0082.1. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Greiner S., Lehwark P., Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: Expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W59–W64. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang D., Gao F., Li W.X., Jakovlíc I., Zou H., Zhang J., Wang G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020;20:348–355. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Beier S., Thiel T., Münch T., Scholz U., Mascher M. MISA-web: A web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2583–2585. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:573–580. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kurtz S., Choudhuri J.V., Ohlebusch E., Schleiermacher C., Stoye J., Giegerich R. REPuter: The manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:4633–4642. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang H., Meltzer P., Davis S. RCircos: An R package for Circos 2D track plots. BMC Bioinform. 2013;14:244. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lenz H., Hein A., Knoop V. Plant organelle RNA editing and its specificity factors: Enhancements of analyses and new database features in PREPACT 3.0. BMC Bioinform. 2018;19:255. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2244-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Katoh K., Rozewicki J., Yamada K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019;20:1160–1166. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nguyen L.-T., Schmidt H.A., Von Haeseler A., Minh B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Letunic I., Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W256–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang Y., Tang H., DeBarry J.D., Tan X., Li J., Wang X., Lee T.-H., Jin H., Marler B., Guo H., et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e49. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences of two mitogenomes of Z. aethiopica and Z. odorata are provided as fasta files, along with the annotation information, which is provided as Genbank files and is available through Figshare ((https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591324; accessed on 12 April 2023), (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591318; accessed on 12 April 2023), (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591330; accessed on 12 April 2023), and (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22591327; accessed on 12 April 2023)).


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES