Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1994 Sep;72(3):288–293. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.3.288

Clinical experience with the Wiktor stent in native coronary arteries and coronary bypass grafts.

S Vaishnav 1, S Aziz 1, C Layton 1
PMCID: PMC1025520  PMID: 7946784

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To evaluate the results of implantation of Wiktor tantalum wire coronary stents in stenosed or occluded coronary vessels or in saphenous vein bypass grafts. DESIGN--A retrospective analysis of clinical and angiographic data from patients treated with tantalum wire stents implanted by one operator at two centres. PATIENTS--52 patients undergoing conventional balloon angioplasty had 67 lesions treated by stents after acute or threatened closure of the target vessel, or because the lesions concerned were considered to be at particularly high risk of becoming restenosed, or because the result of primary angioplasty was inadequate. RESULTS--65 of the 67 lesions were successfully stented although in two cases the first attempt failed and a second stent was then implanted successfully. There were no cases of stent occlusion and no myocardial infarctions in hospital or in the follow up period of 1-20 months. Eight patients had haemorrhagic complications that were minor in 4. One patient later had coronary bypass surgery after failure to stent a lesion. Angiographic follow up at a mean of 6 months after stenting showed restenosis associated with 4 of 47 stents studied. All patients with chest pain had had repeat angiography, and 84% of those without symptoms also agreed to reinvestigation after about 6 months. CONCLUSIONS--The Wiktor tantalum wire stent is an effective means of treating acute complications during angioplasty and seems to offer hope of a significant reduction in the rate of late restenosis in both native coronary vessels and saphenous vein bypass grafts. A prospective comparison of balloon angioplasty and stenting is needed.

Full text

PDF
288

Images in this article

293Image
on p.293

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buchwald A., Unterberg C., Werner G., Voth E., Kreuzer H., Wiegand V. Initial clinical results with the Wiktor stent: a new balloon-expandable coronary stent. Clin Cardiol. 1991 May;14(5):374–379. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960140504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carrozza J. P., Jr, Kuntz R. E., Levine M. J., Pomerantz R. M., Fishman R. F., Mansour M., Gibson C. M., Senerchia C. C., Diver D. J., Safian R. D. Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Aug;20(2):328–337. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haude M., Erbel R., Issa H., Straub U., Rupprecht H. J., Treese N., Meyer J. Subacute thrombotic complications after intracoronary implantation of Palmaz-Schatz stents. Am Heart J. 1993 Jul;126(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(07)80005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kiemeneij F., Laarman G. J., van der Wieken R., Suwarganda J. Emergency coronary stenting with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for failed transluminal coronary angioplasty: results of a learning phase. Am Heart J. 1993 Jul;126(1):23–31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(07)80006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muller D. W., Shamir K. J., Ellis S. G., Topol E. J. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Jan 1;69(1):63–68. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90677-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pepine C. J., Hirshfeld J. W., Macdonald R. G., Henderson M. A., Bass T. A., Goldberg S., Savage M. P., Vetrovec G., Cowley M., Taussig A. S. A controlled trial of corticosteroids to prevent restenosis after coronary angioplasty. M-HEART Group. Circulation. 1990 Jun;81(6):1753–1761. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.6.1753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Platko W. P., Hollman J., Whitlow P. L., Franco I. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of saphenous vein graft stenosis: long-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Dec;14(7):1645–1650. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Serruys P. W., Foley D. P., de Feyter P. J. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a proposal of new comparative approaches based on quantitative angiography. Br Heart J. 1992 Oct;68(4):417–424. doi: 10.1136/hrt.68.10.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sigwart U., Puel J., Mirkovitch V., Joffre F., Kappenberger L. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1987 Mar 19;316(12):701–706. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198703193161201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sundram P., Harvey J. R., Johnson R. G., Schwartz M. J., Baim D. S. Benefit of the perfusion catheter for emergency coronary artery grafting after failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Feb 1;63(5):282–285. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90331-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. de Jaegere P. P., Serruys P. W., Bertrand M., Wiegand V., Kober G., Marquis J. F., Valeix B., Uebis R., Piessens J. Wiktor stent implantation in patients with restenosis following balloon angioplasty of a native coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Mar 1;69(6):598–602. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90148-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES